ICAEW Financial Management

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12
At a glance
Powered by AI
Airserv provides baggage handling services and equipment to European airports on both a long-term and short-term basis. They are considering a new two-year contract with a UK regional airport that would require them to provide both staffing and equipment.

Airserv typically provides baggage handling staff using existing airport facilities, but can also provide its own equipment for short-term needs. The potential new contract is for 2 years from 2017-2018 and would pay up to £3 million for staffing and equipment in 3 annual installments.

The contract would require around 105,120 hours of manual labor split evenly over the two years at £7.50/hour as well as 4 supervisors each year at £160,000. Payments would be made on Dec 31 each year from 2017-2019.

PROFESSIONAL LEVEL EXAMINATION

MARCH 2016
Mock Exam 2
(2 hours)

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
This paper consists of THREE questions (100 marks).

1. Ensure your candidate details are on the front of your answer booklet. You will be
given time to sign, date and print your name on the answer booklet, and to enter
your candidate number on this question paper. You may not write anything else
until the exam starts.
2. Answer each question in black ballpoint pen only.
3. Answers to each question must begin on a new page and must be clearly
numbered. Use both sides of the paper in your answer booklet.
4. The examiner will take account of the way in which answers are presented.
5. When the assessment is declared closed, you must stop writing immediately. If
you continue to write (even completing your candidate details on a continuation
booklet), it will be classed as misconduct.
A Formula Sheet and Discount Tables are provided with this examination paper.

IMPORTANT

Question papers contain confidential You MUST enter your candidate number
information and must NOT be removed in this box.
from the examination hall.

DO NOT TURN OVER UNTIL YOU


ARE INSTRUCTED TO BEGIN WORK

Copyright ICAEW 2016. All rights reserved.


1 Airserv Ltd (Airserv) provides baggage handling services to European airports.
Typically the company supplies staff who provide and manage baggage handling
services using an airports existing facilities, but the company can also supply its
own baggage handling systems as well as staff when airports require additional
short-term capacity. Airservs accounting year end is 31 December.

Airserv has recently received details of a potential new contract which is available
at short notice with a regional airport in the UK. The airport is looking for a
company to supply both baggage handling systems and staff for a period of two
years from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2018 to meet increased demand
whilst a new terminal is being constructed at the airport.
The airport is offering to pay a maximum fee of 3 million for the two-year contract,
although tenders can be submitted below this figure. The contract fee will be
payable in three equal annual instalments on 31 December 2017, 31 December
2018 and 31 December 2019.
The directors of Airserv have estimated that 105,120 hours of manual labour will
be worked during the two-year contract period. This labour will be specifically hired
for the period of the contract only and will be paid a fixed rate of 7.50 per hour (at
31 December 2016 prices). These manual labour hours will be split evenly
between the two years of the contract. In addition, the contract would require
Airserv to hire four new supervisors, who similarly would be hired for the duration
of the contract only and the total cost of employing these new supervisors would
be 160,000 (at 31 December 2016 prices) in each year of the contract.
Airserv is due to complete an existing contract in December 2016 and will be able
to transfer baggage handling equipment previously used on that contract to the
new contract. This equipment was originally purchased three years ago (ie in
2013) for 3 million and if it was not transferred to the new contract, it could be
sold on 31 December 2016 for 0.75 million (in money terms).
The costs of installing this equipment in the new airport would be 40,000 payable
on 31 December 2016. This cost would be treated as part of the capital cost of the
equipment for tax purposes. As at 31 December 2018 it is estimated that this
equipment would have negligible residual value as it will by then have reached the
end of its useful life.
Full capital allowances at a rate of 18% pa on a reducing balance basis have to
date been used as soon as they were available on this equipment and the
directors will continue to use such allowances in future if the equipment is retained
and used on the new contract. A balancing charge or allowance will arise on
disposal of the equipment (either on 31 December 2016 or 31 December 2018). It
can be assumed that throughout its ownership of this equipment, Airserv pays
corporation tax at a rate of 21% pa and that all tax is paid at the end of the
accounting year to which it relates.
To undertake this new contract, Airserv also expects to incur other incremental
operating costs of 150,000 (at 31 December 2016 prices) in each of the two
years of the contract.

2 of 12
Airservs directors have estimated the real after-tax cost of capital for the new
contract to be 10% pa.
In considering the potential new contract the directors have estimated that in the
years ending
31 December 2017, 2018 and 2019 inflation will be 3%, 4% and 5% pa
respectively. These rates of inflation will apply to the labour (manual and
supervisory) and other operating costs only.
It can be assumed that all cash flows arise at the end of the year to which they
relate.
Requirements
1.1 Working in money terms and assuming that the company submits a tender of
3 million which is accepted by the airport, calculate the net present value of
the new airport contract at 31 December 2016. (14 marks)
1.2 Calculate and comment on the sensitivity of the net present value of the new
airport contract to:
(a) Total incremental labour costs (manual and supervisory); and
(b) The amount of the contract fee. (9 marks)
1.3 Identify the principal strengths and weaknesses of the sensitivity analysis
undertaken in (b) above and suggest two ways in which its weaknesses might
be addressed. (6 marks)
1.4 Identify and discuss the real options that may be associated with the contract.
(6 marks)
Total: 35 marks

3 of 12
2 The directors of Winton Electrical plc (Winton), a listed electrical contracting
company, are currently considering the possibility of a one-for-four rights issue at a
20% discount to the current share price. Issue costs for the rights issue will be 3%
of the gross proceeds and the net proceeds will be invested in a new project. The
Finance Director, an ICAEW Chartered Accountant, has calculated that the project
has an estimated net present value of 1 million. At the present time, details of this
project have not yet been made known to the market, the book value of the
companys ordinary share capital (50p ordinary shares) is 4 million and the
market capitalisation of the company is 40 million.

Requirements
2.1 Calculate:
(a) The theoretical ex-rights price per share; and
(b) The value of the right to subscribe per existing share. (4 marks)
2.2 Prepare calculations to demonstrate the impact of each of the following
scenarios on the wealth of an investor who owns 1,000 shares in Winton:
(a) The investor takes no action with regard to the rights issue.
(b) The investor sells his rights under the rights issue.
(c) The investor takes up 70% of his entitlement under the rights issue and
sells the other 30% of his entitlement. (6 marks)
2.3 Describe the reasons why, in practice, an ex-rights share price might differ
from the theoretical ex-rights price. (5 marks)
2.4 As an alternative to the rights issue, the directors are considering reducing the
current years dividend to release the funds required to invest in the new
project. Discuss the issues that the directors should consider before deciding
to take this alternative course of action. (10 marks)
2.5 Discuss when the projects NPV would be reflected in the share price under
the three forms of the efficient market hypothesis and outline the implications
that behavioural issues have for market efficiency. (6 marks)
2.6 With reference to the ICAEW fundamental principles, discuss the key ethical
issues that should be considered in light of the fact that details of this project
have not yet been made known to the market. (4 marks)
Total: 35 marks

4 of 12
BLANK PAGE

5 of 12
3 Note. In all parts of the question, calculations should be undertaken to the nearest
.

3.1 Rawthorpe plc (Rawthorpe) is a UK listed company that imports and exports
goods on a regular basis. On 1 November 2015 Rawthorpe signed three
contracts. Payment of the sums due under each of these three contracts is to
be made on 30 April 2016. Brief details of the three contracts are as follows:
A sale of goods to Birkby Inc, a US customer, for $411,000.
A sale of goods to Honley Inc, another US customer, for 1,100,000.
A purchase of goods from Paddock Inc, a US supplier, for $1,750,000.
On 1 November the $/ spot rate was quoted at $1.3800 1.3830/ and the
six-month forward rate at that time was being quoted at a premium of 3.50
3.45 cents. At the same time, the treasurer of Rawthorpe also obtained the
following information regarding sterling futures contracts:
Sterling futures (contract size 62,500)
Settlement date Contract price
$/
December 1.3670
March 1.3480
June 1.3270
September 1.3190
Requirements
(a) Calculate the sterling amount receivable or payable on these three
contracts if on 1 November the company had chosen to hedge its net
dollar transaction exposure using a forward market hedge. (3 marks)
(b) Explain how a futures hedge could have been established and executed
on 1 November, making clear the precise contract that would have been
used, whether that contract would have been bought or sold and
calculating the number of contracts that would have been used for the
futures hedge. (3 marks)
(c) Calculate the outcome of the futures hedge if, on 30 April 2016, the spot
rate is $1.4100 1.4130/ and the price of the relevant futures contract is
$1.4000. (4 marks)
(d) Explain two causes of the hedge inefficiency which may arise with a
futures hedge. (4 marks)
3.2 It is now 9 March 2016 and Rawthorpe intends to purchase goods from a
Swiss supplier for which payment of SF2.5 million will be required in three
months time. The treasurer has today obtained the following quotations from
the companys bank:
Spot rate SF1.5900 5935/
Three-month forward rate SF1.5850 5885/
Further discussions with the bank have revealed that Rawthorpe could
arrange an over-the-counter option on Swiss francs. At an exercise price of

6 of 12
SF1.5840 a call option on Swiss francs would cost 15p per SF100, whilst a put
option on Swiss Francs would cost 13p per SF100.
Requirements
(a) Calculate how much Rawthorpe would have to pay in sterling if a forward
contract was used to hedge the transaction risk. (1 mark)
(b) Calculate the maximum amount Rawthorpe would have to pay in sterling if
an appropriate over-the-counter option at an exercise price of SF1.5840
was used to hedge the transaction risk and state the effective exchange
rate that this sterling cost would represent. (4 marks)
(c) Calculate the total sterling amount that Rawthorpe would have to pay if, in
three months time, the spot rate is SF1.5940 5975 and an over-the-
counter option at an exercise price of SF1.5840 had been used to hedge
the transaction risk. (2 marks)
3.3 Rawthorpe is also due to make a payment of 200,000 in six months time to a
German supplier. Today the spot rate is 1.0700 1.0750/ and the six-month
forward rate is at a 2 1.90 cents premium. Annual interest rates in the UK and
the eurozone are currently:
Borrowing rate Deposit rate
UK 2.5% 1.5%
Eurozone 3.5% 2.5%
The treasurer is considering the use of a money market hedge to fix the
sterling cost of the payment, but as an alternative is considering either leading
or lagging the 200,000 payment to reduce the overall sterling cost of the
transaction. The company would not need to borrow to undertake any of these
alternatives.
Requirements
(a) Demonstrate how a money market hedge could be used to fix the sterling
cost of the payment and calculate the sterling cost using this method.
(4 marks)
(b) Calculate the effective forward exchange rate this sterling cost would
represent. (1 mark)
(c) In light of the information available, advise the treasurer whether leading or
lagging the 200,000 payment would be an appropriate strategy for the
company in this scenario. Prepare relevant calculations to support your
recommendation. (4 marks)
Total: 30 marks

7 of 12
PROFESSIONAL LEVEL EXAMINATION
Financial Management

FORMULAE AND DISCOUNT TABLES

Formulae you may require:


(a) Discounting an annuity
1 1
The annuity factor: AF1 n = 1
r (1 + r) n

Where AF = annuity factor


n = number of payments
r = discount rate as a decimal
D 0 (1 + g)
(b) Dividend growth model: k e = +g
P0

Where ke = cost of equity


D0 = current dividend per ordinary share
g = the annual dividend growth rate
P0 = the current ex-div price per ordinary share
(c) Capital asset pricing model: rj = rf + j (rm rf)
Where rj = the expected return from security j
rf = the risk free rate
j = the beta of security j
rm = the expected return on the market portfolio
D(1 T)
(d) e = a (1 + )
E

Where e = beta of equity in a geared firm


a = ungeared (asset) beta
D = market value of debt
E = market value of equity
T = corporation tax rate
Note. Candidates may use other versions of these formulae but should then define
the symbols they use.

8 of 12
DISCOUNT TABLES
Present value of
Interest Number of Present value of 1 receivable at
rate years 1 receivable at the end of each of
p.a. n the end of n years n years
1% 1 0.990 0.990
2 0.980 1.970
3 0.971 2.941
4 0.961 3.902
5 0.951 4.853
6 0.942 5.795
7 0.933 6.728
8 0.923 7.652
9 0.914 8.566
10 0.905 9.471
5% 1 0.952 0.952
2 0.907 1.859
3 0.864 2.723
4 0.823 3.546
5 0.784 4.329
6 0.746 5.076
7 0.711 5.786
8 0.677 6.463
9 0.645 7.108
10 0.614 7.722
10% 1 0.909 0.909
2 0.826 1.736
3 0.751 2.487
4 0.683 3.170
5 0.621 3.791
6 0.564 4.355
7 0.513 4.868
8 0.467 5.335
9 0.424 5.759
10 0.386 6.145
15% 1 0.870 0.870
2 0.756 1.626
3 0.658 2.283
4 0.572 2.855
5 0.497 3.352
6 0.432 3.784
7 0.376 4.160
8 0.327 4.487
9 0.284 4.772
10 0.247 5.019

9 of 12
20% 1 0.833 0.833
2 0.694 1.528
3 0.579 2.106
4 0.482 2.589
5 0.402 2.991
6 0.335 3.326
7 0.279 3.605
8 0.233 3.837
9 0.194 4.031
10 0.162 4.192

10 of 12
BLANK PAGE

11 of 12
ICAEW
Metropolitan House
321 Avebury Boulevard
Milton Keynes
MK9 2FZ
www.icaew.com

You might also like