Cap Rate Rate Report
Cap Rate Rate Report
Cap Rate Rate Report
From: CynthiaRowley,DirectorPropertyTaxDivision
Subject:CapitalizationRateStudy
ThePropertyTaxDivisionoftheMinnesotaDepartmentofRevenueisresponsiblefortheassessmentof
utility,pipeline,andrailroadoperatingproperty.WecompleteaCapitalizationRateStudyeachyear.The
ratesdevelopedinthestudyareusedaspartofthevaluationsoftheseproperties.
Wewelcomedpartnersfromutility,pipelineandrailroadcompaniestothedepartmentsSpringForumon
March8,2017.TheysharedindustryspecificinsightattheForum.
WepostedtheinitialCapitalizationRateStudyonApril20,2017andwelcomedcommentsuntilApril28,
2017.Weappreciatedthecommentswereceived.Thecommentswerethoughtfulandprovideduswith
additional ideas for the Study. We apologize for the brief comment period. We remain committed to
providingasmuchtimeforcommentsaspossible,butweneedtobeawareofourstatutorydeadlines.
WerevisedtheStudyafterwereviewedyourcomments.
WhocanIcontactwithquestions?
HollySoderbeck,StateAssessedPropertySection,PropertyTaxDivision
6515566119,[email protected]
Sincerely,
CynthiaRowley,Director
PropertyTaxDivision
600N.RobertSt.,St.Paul,MN55146 Anequalopportunityemployer
www.revenue.state.mn.us Thismaterialisavailableinalternateformats.
2017CapitalizationRateStudy,Revised
AssessmentYear2017
PropertyTaxDivision
MinnesotaDepartmentofRevenue
RevisedMay17,2017
Page | 1 Introduction
TableofContents
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................4
Yield Capitalization Rate.........................................................................................................................5
Guideline Companies 6
Market Rate of Equity 6
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) 6
Empirical Capital Asset Pricing Model 8
Build-Up Model 8
Dividend Growth Model (DGM) 9
Multi-Stage Dividend Growth Model (Multi-Stage DGM) 11
Market Rate of Debt 11
Market Rate of Preferred Stock 12
Direct Capitalization Rate ..................................................................................................................... 12
Guideline Companies 12
Equity Component 13
Debt Component 13
Flotation Costs....................................................................................................................................... 13
Company-Specific Risk ......................................................................................................................... 14
Illiquidity ............................................................................................................................................... 15
Growth ................................................................................................................................................... 15
Short-Term Growth Rate 15
Long-Term Growth Rate 16
Inflation 17
Market-to-Book Ratios .......................................................................................................................... 18
State Assessed Property Spring Forum ................................................................................................. 18
Revision Comments .............................................................................................................................. 19
Cost of Debt 19
Cost of Equity 19
Illiquidity 21
Flotation Costs 21
Value Line Investment Survey Report Dates 22
Studies Completed by Others 22
Direct Capitalization Rates 22
Questions? ............................................................................................................................................. 22
Appendix A Electric ............................................................................................................................. A-1
Appendix B Gas Distribution ............................................................................................................... B-1
Appendix C Gas Transmission Pipeline .............................................................................................. C-1
Appendix D Fluid Transportation Pipeline .......................................................................................... D-1
Page | 2 Introduction
Appendix E Class I Railroads and Other Railroads ..............................................................................E-1
Appendix F Ex Ante Calculation .......................................................................................................... F-1
Appendix G Guideline Company Addendum ...................................................................................... G-1
Appendix H Comparison of Studies ..................................................................................................... H-1
Page | 3 Introduction
Introduction
The Minnesota Department of Revenue is responsible for the assessment of utility, pipeline, and railroad
operating property. The department considers these market segments State Assessed Property. The
department completes this study to determine unitary valuations of State Assessed Property in Minnesota.
The departments Property Tax Division assesses these properties, in part, using the income approach to
valuation. The income capitalization approach measures the present value of the anticipated future
benefits of property ownership. There are two methods of income capitalization: direct and yield
capitalization.1
Yield capitalization calculates the net present value of the anticipated future income by
discounting cash flows using the yield rate.
Direct capitalization converts an estimate of a single years net operating income expectancy into
an indication of value for the subject property. This conversion is based on the market-observed
relationship between an income level and market value.
Under the income approach, yield capitalization rates are used in yield capitalization models and direct
capitalization rates are used in direct capitalization models. The table below summarizes the rates derived
from this study, by market segment.
The band of investment method is used for both the yield capitalization and direct capitalization rates.
This method calculates the combined rate of the debt and equity components using the capital structure
indicated by the market. The table below shows an example of the band of investment method:
1 Appraisal Institute (2013). The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14th Edition, Page 46
2 This is the difference between the yield capitalization rate and the direct capitalization rate for each market segment.
3 Mean five-year growth rates from Yahoo! Finance for Gas Transmission Pipeline and Fluid Transportation Pipeline. Mean
growth rates from five year projected earnings growth Value Line Investment for Electric, Gas Distribution, Class I Railroads,
and Other Railroads.
4 This is the estimated long-term growth rate of the United States Economy, explained in further detail in the Growth section of
this narrative.
5 See the Inflation Section
Page | 4 Introduction
YieldCapitalizationRate
The yield capitalization model is based on the premise that the value of a property is equivalent to the
present value of all future benefits.6 Yield capitalization calculates the present value of the anticipated
future income by discounting cash flows using the yield rate (Y0).
The present value of future benefits as of the assessment date is what the current owner would be giving
up by selling the property and what the new owner would be
receiving by purchasing the property. KeyVariablesusedinequations
Because explicit forecasts of cash flows are generally not made into perpetuity, after the period of explicit
forecasts the assumption is made that the growth rate will become stable and a long-term growth rate (g)
is applied to the cash flows into perpetuity. This step is called the reversion. The formula below shows
three periods of explicit forecasts followed by the reversion.
Value = NCF1 / (1+Y0)1 + NCF2 / (1+Y0)2 + NCF3 / (1+Y0)3 + ((NCF3 * (1+g)/ (Y0-g)) / (1+Y0)3)
Stable Growth Yield Capitalization is used when explicit forecasts of net cash flows are not available or
when the forecasted growth in net cash flows is stable. This model is simplified, but is mathematically
identical to the Discounted Cash Flows model when the forecasted growth rate (g) is constant.
A version of this model that assumes that the constant growth rate is 0%, which means that the income
with remain the same over time is called a Zero Percent Stable Growth Yield Capitalization Model.
If the further assumption is made that the net cash flows will be equal to the net operating income
which means that depreciation will be equal to capital expenditures over time the formula becomes:
6Western States Association of Tax Administrators, (2009). Appraisal Handbook Unit Valuation of Centrally Assessed
Properties, Page III-13
Page | 5 Yield Capitalization Rate
GuidelineCompanies
The department reviews the Standard Industrial Classification Code and market segments listed by Value
Line Investment Survey when selecting guideline companies. The department began with the Value Line
Investment Survey industry because Value Line is a well-respected, widely used publication. Value Line
classifies equities into 100 unique industries and groupings. Value Line creates their industries in-house
and every company is constantly evaluated to make sure that they are located in the proper sector.7
The department may not have included companies that underwent a merger or acquisition in the previous
calendar year or companies that have announced an upcoming merger or acquisition during the current
calendar year.
The department reviewed possible guideline companies for comparability in their market segments to the
companies doing business in Minnesota. See the Guideline Company Selection beginning on page G-1 for
details on the companies reviewed for each market segment.
MarketRateofEquity
The department used the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Dividend Growth Model (DGM)
to determine the market rate of equity for each market segment. The Build-Up Model was also
considered. The market rate of equity for each market segment was selected after considering five
different CAPMs and two different DGMs. The models allowed the department to establish a range of
acceptability. The department arrived at the indicated rate of equity by placing the most reliance on the
Dividend Growth Model, using earnings growth, and secondary reliance on Dr. Aswath Damodarans
forward-looking model and the Ex Post model. The department explains these models in more detail
below.
CapitalAssetPricingModel(CAPM)
The CAPM is based on the theory that all investors will independently optimize their portfolios. The
expected return on an asset is related to its risk. The department uses this model to determine the market
rate of equity. The department used the U.S. Treasury 20-year coupon bond yield as of December 30,
2016, as the risk-free rate in the CAPM. It also uses a market specific beta that is calculated using data
from the Value Line Investment Survey.
Damodaran also spoke on the subject, stating, There is only one rate that the Federal Reserve sets, and it
is the Fed Funds rate. It is the rate at which banks trade funds, that they hold at the Federal Reserve, with
each other. He goes on to say, interest rates in the U.S. (and Europe) have been low because inflation
has been non-existent and real growth has been anemic.9
7 Severo Nieves, (9 March 2016). Value Line Institutional Services, Institutional Sales & Marketing, Analyst, email
8 Bernanke, Ben. (30 March 2015). Why are interest rates so low? Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/ben-
bernanke/posts/2015/03/30-why-interest-rates-so-low.
9 Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (4 September 2015). The Fed, interest rates, and stock prices: fighting the fear factor. Retrieved
from http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-fed-interest-rates-and-stock-prices.html.
Beta
The beta selected for each market segment indicates the market segments risk relative to the market. The
effects of unlevering and relevering guideline companies betas for the selected capital structure for each
market segment were analyzed. The income tax liability data was not reliable for Gas Transmission
Pipeline or Fluid Transportation Pipeline companies because the companies are limited partnerships and
most or all of the income tax liability is passed-through to the shareholders.
See each market segments Beta Analysis page in the appendices for more information on how the
department arrived at the indicated beta.
As provided by Damodaran, Broadly speaking, there are two ways of estimating equity risk premiums,
with the first being a historical premium estimated by looking at the difference between past returns on
stocks and the risk free investment and the second being a forward looking estimate, where you back out
from stock prices what investors are building in as an expected return on stocks in the future.13
The department reviewed five different calculations of the equity risk premium:
Ex Post, long-term expected equity risk premium from Duff & Phelps Annual Valuation
Handbook: Guide to Cost of Capital
Supply Side, long-term expected equity returns forecasted by the use of supply side models from
Duff & Phelps Annual Valuation Handbook: Guide to Cost of Capital
Ex Ante, forward looking model using a three-stage dividend growth model of the Standard &
Poors 500
Damodaran, forward looking equity risk premium as calculated by Dr. Aswath Damodaran,
Professor of Finance at the Stern School of Business at New York University
Duff & Phelps, recommended equity risk premium (conditional). The Duff & Phelps
recommended equity risk premium was developed in relation to (and should be used in
conjunction with) a 3.50% normalized risk-free rate.14
Historical risk premiums have high standard errors and they assume Beta
that U.S. equity markets will revert to what they have historically
delivered as returns. Yet, the difference between annual returns on investments of stocks and the 10-year
Treasury Bond as provided by Damodaran have changed significantly over time, as shown in the below
chart15:
TimePeriod Stocksminus10year
TreasuryBond
19282016 6.24%
19672016 4.37%
20072016 3.62%
EmpiricalCapitalAssetPricingModel
The Empirical Capital Asset Pricing Model (ECAPM) is modified from the above CAPM Model. The
ECAPM applies 25% weight to the equity risk premium component and 75% weight to the beta times the
equity risk premium component. This reduces the sensitivity of the cost of equity estimate.
According to Steven Kihm, Andrew Satchwell, and Peter Cappers, the model mutes the sensitivity of the
cost of equity estimate to changes in the beta coefficient, consistent with the adjustment suggested by the
empirical research.16
The equity risk premium (RPe) is multiplied by the market segment-specific beta () and 75%. The
product is then added to the equity risk premium (RPe) multiplied by 25%. The two products and the risk
free rate are added tighter to estimate the market rate of equity for the market segment.
Market Rate of Equity for Market Segment = (RPe x x 75%) + (RPe x 25%) + Rf
We completed five ECAPM models for each market segment, using the equity risk premiums described in
the Capital Asset Pricing Model section above.
BuildUpModel
The Build-Up Model is another model used to estimate the market rate of equity. Some view this as a
version of the Capital Asset Pricing Model without specifically incorporating systematic risk.17 A
fundamental assumption of the CAPM is that the risk premium portion of a securitys expected return is a
function of that securitys systematic risk.18
15 Damodaran, A. January 2017 Data Update 2: The Resilience of US Equities. January 13, 2017.
http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.in/2017/01/january-2017-data-update-2-resilience.html
16 Kihm, Steven; Satchwell, Andrew; and Cappers, Peter. The Financial Impacts of Declining Investment Opportunities on
Electric Utility Shareholders, Electricity Markets & Policy Group, Technical Brief, Page 20
th
17 Pratt, Shannon and Grabowski, Roger, Cost of Capital Applications and Examples, 4 Ed., Page 102 (2010)
18 Ibid, p. 105
The Build-Up Model can be used when the inputs are not available to complete CAPM. The department
was able to complete the CAPM for each market segment and did not need to resort to the Build-Up
Model.
DividendGrowthModel(DGM)
The department also uses the DGM to determine the market rate of equity. It is based on the theory that
the prices paid for a share of stock reflect the investors discounted present value of future expected
earnings.20 The DGM is a widely used method and is also called the Discounted Cash Flows Model or
Gordon Growth Model. The formula for this model is the same as the simplified Discounted Cash Flows
Income Model explained above, referred to as Stable Growth Yield Capitalization, using a stable growth
rate. Estimating the sustainable growth rate is explored below in this section and the Growth section.
Theoretically, the growth estimate in the DGM is the estimated growth in dividends, which are cash flows
to equity shareholders after reinvestment. Dividend growth estimates may track earnings growth
estimates. However, companies may change dividend payment policies drastically, resulting in large
differences between earnings growth estimates and dividend growth estimates.
A consensus based on substantial academic literature indicates analysts forecasts of earnings take account
of all the information provided by more formulaic forecasting rules and incorporate other information as
well. Based on these findings, the most common solution is to assume that the dividend payout rate remains
effectively constant and to use analyst forecasts of earnings growth as a proxy for the growth rate of
dividends.21
Another issue that leads the department to question the usefulness and reliability of the dividend growth
rate in this model is the trend for U.S. companies to include stock buybacks in their dividend payment
policies. This is discussed in detail in the Stock Buybacks section.
The formula uses Dividend Yield (DY), which is next years expected dividends per share divided by the
current market price per share of stock, plus an estimate of growth. Both dividend and earnings growth
models were reviewed.
th
19 Keown, Arthur; Martin, John; and Petty, J., Foundations of Finance: The Logic and Practice of Financial Management, 8
Ed., (2014). Page 195
20 Western States Association of Tax Administrators (2009)., Appraisal Handbook Unit Valuation of Centrally Assessed
Properties, Page III-20
21 Cornell, Bradford, (1999). The Equity Risk Premium, Page 105
Instead of solving for value as the Stable Growth Yield Capitalization Model does, the DGM solves for
cost of equity.
The dividend and earnings growth rates provided by Value Line Investment Survey were used for the
guideline companies for the Railroad, Electric, and Gas Distribution segments. Value Line Investment
Survey provides analysts estimates of change in earnings and dividends from 2013-2015 to 2019-2021.
Guideline companies for the Gas Transmission Pipeline and Fluid Transportation Pipeline segments did
not have sufficient data provided by Value Line for earnings or dividends growth rates. As a result, the
growth estimate for the next five years as provided by Yahoo! Finance was used. There is less information
available for earnings growth and dividend growth estimates in the Gas Transmission Pipeline and Fluid
Transportation Pipeline market segments, causing concern about the reliability of these estimates.
See each market segments Dividend Growth Model page in the appendices for more information on how
the department arrived at the indicated rate.
The growth rate used in the DGM is a short-term growth rate, typically much higher than the growth rate
of the U.S. economy. This model is used to calculate value of a company into perpetuity. It is not possible
for a company to grow at a growth rate higher than the U.S. economy in the long-term. According to
Damodaran, the amount of cash that U.S. companies are returning to stockholders is unstainable, given
the earnings and expectations of growth.22 Pratt and Grabowski also state, Long-term growth rates
22 Damodaran, A. January 2017 Data Update 9: Dividends and Buybacks Damodaran, February 6, 2017.
http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2017/02/january-2017-data-update-9-
MultiStageDividendGrowthModel(MultiStageDGM)
The department completed a multi-stage dividend growth model to account for the short-term growth
estimates available. Unlike the DGM discussed in the previous section, the multi-stage dividend growth
model assumes that growth is not constant. This allows the
department to use analysts short-term growth estimates and the KeyVariablesusedinequations
long-term, sustainable growth estimate.
KE CostofEquity
David Parcell (2010) provides the following multi-stage DGM D1 ExpectedDividends
formula in The Cost of Capital A Practitioners Guide,
published by the Society of Utility and Regulatory Financial P0 RecentStockPrice
Analysts: G1 Projected5yearGrowthRate
G AverageofG1andg
KE = (D1 / P0) + 0.67(G1) + 0.33(g)
g StableGrowth
StockBuybacks
A companys net income represents income that the company can reinvest or distribute to its owners.24
Dividends are often considered the primary approach for publicly traded firms to return cash or assets to
their shareholders. However, companies can also return cash to their stockholders through stock buybacks
buying back outstanding stock in the firm and reduce the number of shares outstanding.25
Because a company cannot act as its own shareholder, the company absorbs repurchased shares, and the
number of outstanding shares on the market is reduced. This increases the relative ownership stake of
each investor because there are fewer shares, or claims, on the earnings of the company.26 The amount of
cash that U.S. companies are returning to stockholders is unsustainable, given the earnings and
expectations of growth. In 2015 and 2016, the companies in the S&P 500 returned more than 100% of
earnings to investors.27
Given the trend of U.S. companies to include stock buybacks in their dividend payment policies, the
department questions the reliability of the expected dividends and expected dividend growth rate inputs of
the Dividend Growth Model (DGM).
MarketRateofDebt
The department used the Corporate Bond Yield Averages for Public Utility Bonds from Mergent Bond
Record to estimate the market rate of debt for each company used as a guideline company for the Electric,
Gas Distribution, Gas Transmission Pipeline, and Fluid Transportation Pipeline market segments.
dividends.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FpHUuM+%28Musing
s+on+Markets%29
th
23 Pratt, Shannon and Grabowski, Roger, (2010). Cost of Capital Applications and Examples, 4 Ed., Page 681
24 Keown, Arthur; Martin, John; and Petty, J., (2014). Foundations of Finance: The Logic and Practice of Financial
Management, 8th Ed., Page 53
th
25 Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (2015). Applied Corporate Finance, 4 Ed., Page 439
26 http://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/041702.asp
27 Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (2017, February 06). January 2017 Data Update 9: Dividends and Buybacks. Retrieved February
06, 2017, from http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2017/02/january-2017-data-update-9-
dividends.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%2Bblogspot%2FpHUuM%2B%28
Musings%2Bon%2BMarkets%29
Page | 11 Dividend Growth Model
The department used the Corporate Bond Yield Averages for Industrial Bonds from Mergent Bond
Record to estimate the market rate of debt for each company used as a guideline company for the Railroad
market segments.
The department considered using the yield to maturity of the guideline companies for selecting the cost of
debt for each market segment. The department compiled and reviewed data from S&P Capital IQ
McGraw Hill Financial. However, the data was not available for several guideline companies. Given that
the data was incomplete, the department will use the bond yield averages from Mergent Bond Record for
the 2017 assessment. The department will continue to research additional sources for future assessments.
In previous years, the department used a pre-tax cost of debt. The department will continue to review use
of an after-tax cost of debt.
See each market segments Indicated Rate of Debt page for more information on how the department
arrived at the indicated rate of debt.
MarketRateofPreferredStock
Preferred stock makes up a minimal percentage of the capital structure for all market segments. The
amount of capital structure attributable to preferred stock was not materially significant and was not
included in indicated capital structure for each market segment.
DirectCapitalizationRate
Direct capitalization is used to convert an estimate of a KeyVariablesusedinequations
single years net operating income expectancy into an
indication of value in one direct step.28 D0 DirectCapitalizationRate
NOI1 NetOperatingIncomeforthe
The direct rate (D0) is an expression of the market
nextyear
observed relationship between price and income.
Value MarketValue
This market observed direct rate is applied to the net
operating income (NOI) of the property to indicate the market value (value).
Value = NOI1 / D0
GuidelineCompanies
The Standard Industrial Classification Code and market segments listed by Value Line Investment Survey
were used when selecting guideline companies. The department began with the Value Line Investment
Survey industry because Value Line is a well-respected, widely used publication. Value Line classifies
equities into 100 unique industries and groupings. Their industries are created in-house and every
company is constantly evaluated to make sure that they are located in the proper sector.29
Companies that underwent a merger or acquisition in the previous calendar year or companies that have
announced an upcoming merger or acquisition during the current calendar year may have been excluded.
28 Western States Association of Tax Administrators (2009). Appraisal Handbook Unit Valuation of Centrally Assessed
Properties, Page III-8
29 Severo Nieves, Value Line Institutional Services, Institutional Sales & Marketing Analyst, email dated March 9, 2016
EquityComponent
An inverse of the Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio is used to estimate the equity component in the direct rate.
The Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E Ratio) as calculated by Value Line Investment Survey was used. The
Trailing P/E Ratio as calculated by Value Line Investment Survey was used if the P/E Ratio was not
calculated. The P/E ratio most indicative of the market segment data was selected. The inverse of the
selected ratio is the equity component of the direct capitalization rate.
The P/E Ratios for the Fluid Transmission Pipelines and the Gas Transmission Pipelines were adjusted for
income tax because the P/E Ratio for those companies did not include income taxes due to the nature of
their legal organization type. The marginal tax rate used for imputing income taxes was 35.0%.30
The P/E Ratio was not adjusted for income taxes for Electric, Gas Distribution, Class I Railroads, or
Other Railroads because those guideline companies P/E Ratios were already adjusted for income taxes.
See each market segments Direct Equity Component page for more information on how the department
arrived at the indicated equity component.
DebtComponent
The department used the Corporate Bond Yield Averages for Public Utility Bonds from Mergent Bond
Record to estimate the market rate of debt for each company used as a guideline company for the Electric,
Gas Distribution, Gas Transmission Pipeline, and Fluid Transportation Pipeline market segments.
The department used the Corporate Bond Yield Averages for Industrial Bonds from Mergent Bond
Record to estimate the market rate of debt for each company used as a guideline company for the Railroad
market segments.
The department considered using the current yield of the guideline companies for selecting the cost of
debt for each market segment. The department compiled and reviewed data from S&P Capital IQ
McGraw Hill Financial. However, the data was not available for several guideline companies. Given that
the data was incomplete, the department will use the bond yield averages from Mergent Bond Record for
the 2016 assessment. The department will continue to research additional sources for future assessments.
In previous years, the department used a pre-tax cost of debt. The department will continue to review use
of an after-tax cost of debt.
See each market segments Indicated Rate of Debt page in the appendices for more information on how
the department arrived at the indicated rate of debt.
FlotationCosts
Flotation costs are costs incurred when a company issues a new security, including fees to an investment
banker, legal fees, accounting, and other out of pocket expenses. The market-determined opportunity cost
30 Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, (2017). OECD StatExtracts, Table II.1. Corporate income tax
rate, http://stats.oecd.org//Index.aspx?QueryId=58204#, downloaded March 8, 2017
The yield rates and direct rates in this study are market derived, using market data. Unlike for determining
allowable rates of return in rate cases, the recovery of previously incurred costs is not added to the yield
rates or direct rates used for estimating market value. The yield rate and direct rate are not recovery
mechanisms for the costs of doing business. Flotation cost adjustments were not made to the yield rate or
direct rate in this study.
Dr. Richard Simonds stated in his paper published in the Journal of Property Tax Assessment &
Administration, When capitalizing net operating income in the income approach, a flotation-cost
adjustment cannot be applied to the cost of capital. Advocates of an adjustment may be confusing the
concept of the allowed rate of return on invested capital in a rate-regulated environment with the concept
of the market-determined opportunity cost of capital.33
Thomas Copeland and Fred Weston find that adjusting for flotation costs in the rate of return is incorrect
because it implicitly adjusts the opportunity cost of funds supplied to the firm. The true market-
determined opportunity cost is unaffected by the flotation costs of a particular firm.34
CompanySpecificRisk
The department does not include an adjustment for company-specific risk or a size premium adjustment
for a specific company. The department estimates the market cost of capital for each market segment, per
Minnesota Rules 8100 and 8106.
The department does not agree with a size premium adjustment based on the average market
capitalization size of the guideline companies and does not find this to be generally accepted practice.
Damodaran points out several reasons why a size adjustment to the CAPM is not appropriate, concluding
that the empirical evidence is not as conclusive as it was initially thought to be.35 He also finds that
forward-looking risk premiums are yielding no premiums for small cap [market capitalization] stocks and
much of the additional risk is either diversifiable or double counted.36
Eugene Fama and Kenneth French analyzed size premiums of companies that move to different market
capitalizations and found, the size premium is almost entirely a result of the extreme positive returns of
small-cap [market capitalization] stocks that move to a big-cap [market capitalization] portfolio from one
year to the next.37
31 Western States Association of Tax Administrators, (2009). Appraisal Handbook Unit Valuation of Centrally Assessed
Properties, Page III-31
rd
32 Copeland, Thomas E., & Weston, Fred J. (1988). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy (3 ed.). Addison-Wesley
Publishing Company.
33 Simonds, Richard R., Dr. (2006). Income Capitalization, Flotation Costs, and the Cost of Capital. Journal of Property Tax
Assessment & Administration, Volume 3, Issue 4.
rd
34 Copeland, Thomas E. & Weston, Fred J. (1988). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy (3 ed.) Addison-Wesley
Publishing Company. Page 534
35 Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications The 2011 Edition.
Retrieved from: http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/ERP2011.pdf
,36 Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (11 April 2015). The small cap premium: Where is the beef? Retrieved from:
http://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-small-cap-premium-fact-fiction-and.html.
37 Fama, Eugene F. and French, Kenneth R. (2007). Migration. Financial Analysts Journal, Volume 63, Number 3. CFA
Institute.
The above referenced quote from the Appraisal of Real Estate is in Chapter 21, The Income Capitalization
Approach. The resource further discusses the Direct and Yield methods in Chapters 23 and 24,
respectively.
Growth
The importance of the growth rate is that it affects the yield model, explained in the Yield Capitalization
Rate section. Minnesota Rules, 8100 and 8106 imply a Zero Percent Growth Yield model. If the
assumption that income streams remain equal over time is incorrect, the model may not accurately
indicate the market value of the company.
For a company with a changing income streams, a Discounted Cash Flows model or Stable Growth Yield
model may better at estimating the value for the company under review. The Discounted Cash Flows
model uses explicit forecasts of income and expenses for each period. These inputs can be estimated if
they are not made available.
The Implied Growth Rate is the difference between the yield rate and the direct rate. The direct rate is the
relationship between an estimate of a single years net operating income and the value of the property,
while the yield rate converts income from future periods into present value.
The Western States Association of Tax Administrators Appraisal Handbook states, direct capitalization
is not affected by the appraisers view of the future income.39 In addition, Unit Valuation Insights states,
The direct capitalization rate is typically calculated as the yield capitalization rate minus an expected
long-term growth rate.40
ShortTermGrowthRate
The department reviewed short-term growth rates from several sources to derive an estimate of a short-
term growth rate for each market segment.
Business news service Reuters provides analysts estimates of market segment earnings per share growth.
The estimates for the next five years for the industry (as of January 17, 2017) are as follows:
38 Appraisal Institute (2013). The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14th Edition, Page 458
39 Ibid., Page III-9
40 Schweihs, Robert P. & Reilly, Robert F. (Spring 2014). Unit Valuation Insights, Issues Related to the Unit Valuation
Principle, Page 77
Page | 15 Public Comment
Value Line Investment Survey provides analysts estimates of change in earnings and dividends from
2013-2015 to 2019-2021. Gas Transmission Pipeline and Fluid Transportation Pipeline segments did not
have sufficient data provided by Value Line for earnings or dividends growth rates. The average growth
rates provided by Value Line Investment Survey are as follows:
Yahoo! Finance provides growth estimates for the next five years for several publicly traded companies.
These estimates were used for Gas Transmission Pipeline market segment and Fluid Transportation
Pipeline market segment. The average growth estimates for the guideline companies are as follows:
GasTransmissionPipeline FluidTransportationPipeline
5YearGrowthEstimate 7.74% 8.97%
Based on the sources above, the indicated short-term growth rate for each market segment is as follows:
This evidence indicates that there is significant short-term growth in each market segment.
LongTermGrowthRate
The department reviewed long-term growth rates from several sources to derive an estimate of long-term
growth for the market as a whole.
Since no firm can grow forever at a rate higher than the growth rate of the economy in which it operates,
the constant growth rate cannot be greater than the overall growth rate of the economy.42 Therefore, the
risk-free rate can be viewed as the maximum constant growth rate for each market segment. The U.S.
Treasury 20-year Coupon Bond Yield on December 30, 2016, was 2.79%.43
The sources analyzed for this report indicate varying rates of growth in the U.S. economy over the long-
term:
41 Genesee & Wyoming is the only railroad company used for the Other Railroads market segment. Genesee & Wyoming does
not pay dividends. Therefore, there is no estimated growth rate for dividends for Genesee & Wyoming.
42 Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (n.d.) The Stable Growth Rate, A. Damodaran,
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/valquestions/stablegrowthrate.htm
43 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, H.15, Selected Interest Rates, Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities
20-year constant maturity quoted on investment bases, 2015 4th quarter daily average, December 30, 2016.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/datadownload/Choose.aspx?rel=H15
After considering the above sources, the department applies the most reliance on the average growth rate
in potential U.S. GDP for 2015 to 2050, and secondary reliance on the U.S. Treasury 20-year Coupon
Bond Yield on December 30, 2016. The indicated long-term growth rate of the U.S. economy is 2.60%.
Inflation
Inflation makes future income less valuable than todays income. Inflation is the percentage change in the
value of the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) on a year-to-year basis. It effectively measures the change in
the prices of a basket of goods and services in a year.49
According to Arthur Keown, John Martin, and J. William Petty, investors require nominal (or quoted)
rate of interest that exceeds the inflation rate or else their realized real return will be negative.50
According to Damodaran, An inflation-indexed Treasury security does not offer a guaranteed nominal
return to buyers, but instead provides a guaranteed real return.51
According to Cornell, inflation is not considered explicitly when using the equity risk premium to
forecast long-run future stock returns because it is already included in the interest rates that go into the
calculation.52 Cornell continues, When investors invest, their goal is to increase future consumption.
Consequently, the success of an investment is measured not in nominal dollars but real dollars investors
are concerned with real returns, defined as the percent increase in purchasing power, not nominal
returns.53
44 World Bank Group Flagship Report, Global Economic Prospects Weak Investment in Uncertain Times, January 2017,
Page 4
45 Trading Economics, United States GDP Growth Rate Forecast, http://www.tradingeconomics.com/forecast/gdp-annual-
growth-rate, accessed on February 22, 2017
46 The Economist Intelligence Unit. http://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?articleid=794253063&Country=United
States&topic=Economy&subtopic=Long-term+outlook&subsubtopic=Summary, accessed on March 6, 2017
47 Congressional Budget Office. (February 2, 2017). The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2017 to 2027,
https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/reports/52390-outlooktestimonyhouse.pdf, accessed on
March 14, 2017 OECD (2014), Growth Prospects and Fiscal Requirements Over the Long Term, OECD Economic Outlook,
Volume 2014/1, Page 224
48 Congressional Budget Office. (February 2, 2017). The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2017 to 2027,
https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/reports/52390-outlooktestimonyhouse.pdf, accessed on
March 14, 2017
49 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/inflation
50 Keown, Arthur; Martin, John; and Petty, J. William, (2014). Foundations of Finance: The Logic and Practice of Financial
Management, 8th Ed., Page 35
th
51 Damodaran, Aswath, Dr. (2015). Applied Corporate Finance, 4 Ed., Page 90
52 Cornell, Bradford, (1999). The Equity Risk Premium, Page 29
53 Ibid. Page 31
The U.S. Treasury issues inflation-indexed securities. Comparing the inflation-indexed securities to the
non-inflation indexed securities, one can estimate the inflation rate. Using the 10-year, 20-year, and 30-
year securities, the department estimated the inflation rate between 1.57% and 1.74% as shown below.55
The department used the expected inflation rate of 2.0% provided by the CBOs estimate in The Budget
and Economic Outlook: 2017 2027.
Given the indicated long-term growth rate of the U.S. economy of 2.60% and the expected inflation rate
of 2.0%, the department estimates the nominal growth rate at 4.60%.
MarkettoBookRatios
The department analyzes market-to-book ratios of publicly traded stock and debt securities by market
segment, as data is available. This analysis indicates how the market perceives the value of these assets
relative to the book value. A market-to-book ratio below one indicates that there may be obsolescence
affecting that market segment; a ratio over one would indicate that there is no obsolescence.
StateAssessedPropertySpringForum
The department held the 2017 State Assessed Property Spring Forum on March 8, 2017 and invited
company representatives from each market segment, academic professionals, employees at the Minnesota
Department of Commerce and Public Utilities Commission, appraisers, and assessors. The forum was an
opportunity for participants to provide input for the upcoming Capitalization Rate Study. We encouraged
everyone to participate. We asked participants to discuss current market conditions, industry trends and
developments, mergers and acquisitions, new projects, and other topics that could affect the Capitalization
Rate Study. Three company representatives discussed the current trends they see in their market segment.
We used the information they provided to see how well it lined up with the data we reviewed while
completing this study.
The company representatives noted that railroad market segment growth has been slowing. We also noted
that forecasts of growth from Value Line have declined for the railroad market segment compared to the
previous year.
The representative for the electric market segment noted that their expected beta is down from last year,
cost of equity is down from last year, and the cost of debt might decline. The department also noted that
the beta, cost of equity, and cost of debt decreased for the electric market segment from the previous year.
54 Congressional Budget Office. (February 2, 2017). The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2017 to 2027,
https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/reports/52390-outlooktestimonyhouse.pdf, accessed on
March 14, 2017
55 Difference between inflation-indexed and non-inflation indexed securities for 10-year, 20-year, and 30-year daily rates,
averaged. Downloaded from www.federalreserve.gov
Page | 18 Public Comment
RevisionComments
The department posted the initial Capitalization Rate Study on April 20, 2017 for public comment. The
department received comments from interested parties and appreciated the responses and feedback for the
2017 Capitalization Rate Study. Your opinions and input were carefully considered. We appreciate
everyone that took the time to provide us with comments.
The department revised some of the content in this report after we received public comments. Overall, the
yield and direct capitalization rates were revised upward. Below are summaries of the comments the
department received and our response.
Several responses indicated that the commenter would like to see changes at least one year prior to
implementation. This may not be feasible in all situations. However, the department understands the
request and will do our best to allow those impacted sufficient time to review the methods we use in
valuation.
CostofDebt
AfterTaxCostofDebt
Most of the feedback the department received expressed a need for additional time to review the after-tax
cost of debt subject. Several of the comments also detailed their disagreement with the after-tax cost of
debt. For the January 2, 2017 assessments, the department will use the before-tax cost of debt. The
department will continue to review the applicability of the after-tax cost of debt for the valuation models
we use. We encourage companies to continue the discussion after they have had additional time to review.
Use of the before-tax cost of debt instead of the after-tax cost of debt results in a higher cost of debt
component of the yield and direct capitalization rates.
CostofDebtDataSources
Some comments indicated that the department should consider using industrial bond yields instead of
utility bond yields for the Gas Transmission Pipeline market segment from Mergent Bond Record. The
comments also indicated the department should consider using Bloomberg and Standard & Poors as data
sources for the bond yield averages. The department will review these other sources of data for future
studies.
In the initial study, the department used Public Utility Bond Averages for December 2016 for the electric,
gas distribution, gas transmission pipeline, and fluid transportation pipeline market segments. The
department uses Industrial Bond Yield Averages for December 2016 for the Class I and Other Railroad
market segments.
After considering the comments, the department used the industrial averages for gas transmission pipeline
and fluid transportation pipeline market segments. This changed the cost of debt from 4.79% to 4.85% for
fluid transportation pipeline market segment and 5.76% to 5.79% for gas transmission pipeline market
segment.
The department used the bond yield averages published in Mergent Bond Record, January 2017 Edition.
CostofEquity
Several of the comments the department received related to the selected cost of equity for different market
segments. In general, the comments indicated that the departments cost of equity is too low. The
department placed the most reliance on Dividend Growth Model, Earnings Growth in the initial study.
The comments generally agreed with this approach, but argued for more reliance on Dividend Growth
Models and less reliance on Capital Asset Pricing Models.
Page | 19 Public Comment
After considering the comments, the department reconciled a higher indicated rate of equity for each
market segment. For the Electric and Gas Distribution market segments, the department placed more
reliance on the Dividend Growth Model Earnings Growth. For the Gas Transmission Pipeline and Fluid
Transportation Pipeline market segments, the department reconciled a higher indicated equity rate for the
Dividend Growth Model Earnings Growth by placing equal reliance on the mean and median. For the
Class I Railroads and Other Railroads market segments, the department placed more reliance on the
Dividend Growth Model Earnings Growth and the Capital Asset Pricing Model Ex Post when
reconciling the indicated rate of equity. The department completed several cost of equity indicators and
selected the cost of equity within the range established by the different cost of equity indicators. The
department reconciled and placed more reliance on specific equity models based on the provided
comments.
DividendGrowthModels
Growth Estimate
Several companies commented that they do not believe the Value Line Investment Survey estimates for
growth are accurate because their analysts use a mix of historical and forecasts in their estimate of growth.
A Value Line education article by Kenneth J. DeFranco, Jr. states, All rates are computed utilizing the
average number for a base three-year period to an average number for a future period in order to eliminate
short-term fluctuations that may distort results.56 Value Lines website also provides an explanation of
their 3-to-5-year projections, stating, the 3-to-5-year projection is based on an analysts educated
estimates. You should consider it as a subjective, but unbiased, measure.57
The department will continue to use the growth estimates as provided in the first publication of this study.
Some comments also indicated that the department could complete their own growth estimate using Value
Line data. The department needs sufficient time to review and complete this calculation. In addition,
others who would be affected by adding this new calculation would not have time to review and offer
their opinion if it were added at this time.
It is also important to note that analysts estimates are estimates from experts in their fields and come
from widely used and respected sources
The department will continue to review the growth estimates by Value Line analysts as well as growth
rates completed by other analysts, such as Zacks, Yahoo! Finance, Reuters, and Standard & Poors. Value
Line, in general, fluctuates less over each year.
The department will continue to review this subject for future studies.
CapitalAssetPricingModelExAnte
Several comments included disagreements with the departments ex ante equity risk premium used in the
Capital Asset Pricing Model. The department believes this forward-looking indicator of the cost of equity
is important to continue to calculate and consider in the reconciliation of the cost of equity.
One comment specifically suggested the department follow ex ante models completed by other states. At
least one of the other states mentioned uses a single-stage dividend growth model of the S&P 500 to
estimate the forward-looking equity risk premium. The department uses a multi-stage dividend growth
model to estimate the forward-looking equity risk premium. Cornell explains the multi-stage approach as
using the analysts forecasts for the first five years, applying a linear convergence to the analysts
forecasts to the long-run economic growth forecast for the next fifteen years, and using the long-run
economic growth rate after that.58 As provided by Damodaran, no firm can grow forever at a rate higher
than the growth rate of the economy in which it operates; the constant growth rate cannot be greater than
the overall growth rate of the economy.59 Therefore, the short-term growth estimates can be unrealistic
when applied to a perpetuity model.
NewCostofEquityModels
The department included two additional cost of equity models in the original publication of this years
study, the Empirical Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Multi-Stage Dividend Growth Model.
In general, the comments we received about these two new models were positive. The department will
continue to complete these models and review them as part of the study. Conversely, a few comments
expressed disagreement with the department making changes without first publishing the changes for a
full year before implementing the changes. The department did not place significant reliance on these
models to select the indicated cost of equity, rather used the new models to establish a reasonable range
for the cost of equity.
Illiquidity
Several comments suggested the department include adjustments for illiquidity. Some comments also
stated that the departments quote from the Appraisal of Real Estate was taken out of context. One
comment also suggested that the departments models are constructed from components that measure a
safe rate and various risks to one extent or another.
The department disagrees with illiquidity adjustments. The department included more information in the
Illiquidity section in response to comments on this subject. See the above Illiquidity section for the
departments position.
FlotationCosts
Several comments suggested the department include adjustments for flotation costs. The department
considered the comments and did not make any changes regarding this subject. See the above Flotation
Costs section for the departments position.
StudiesCompletedbyOthers
Several commenters provided studies they completed, studies completed by other states, and studies
completed for a specific industry as completed by external consultants. The department appreciates
receiving these studies. The department reviews these studies to understand what rates others are
calculating as well as the different models and inputs these rates are based on. It is important to note that
while these other studies are estimating the cost of capital; those completing the studies may use them for
other purposes, for different models, or apply the results to different income levels than the department.
See Appendix H for a comparison of studies.
DirectCapitalizationRates
The department also received comments about the direct capitalization rate. The comments provided
disagreement with the departments use of direct capitalization rates and how the rates are applied to
arrive at an indicator of market value. The Minnesota Tax Court has found the direct capitalization
method authoritative.
Questions?
If you have questions about the 2017 Capitalization Rate Study, please contact Holly Soderbeck at 651-
556-6119 or [email protected].
YieldRate
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
LongTermDebt 36.00% 4.79% 1.72%
CommonEquity 64.00% 8.44% 5.40%
YieldRate 7.13%
ElectricUtilityYieldRate 7.13%
CapitalStructure
Valueof
ValueofLong Valueof TotalMarket %Long %Preferred %Common
Company Preferred
TermDebt CommonEquity Value TermDebt Equity Equity
Equity
AlleteInc. 1,358,900,000 None 3,095,870,393 4,454,770,393 30.50% 0.00% 69.50%
AlliantEnergyCorp. 3,816,900,000 400,000,000 8,208,215,442 12,425,115,442 30.72% 3.22% 66.06%
AmerenCorp. 6,607,000,000 142,000,000 11,971,600,933 18,720,600,933 35.29% 0.76% 63.95%
AmericanElectricPowerCompanyInc. 17,320,000,000 None 29,242,084,868 46,562,084,868 37.20% 0.00% 62.80%
BlackHillsCorp. 3,211,800,000 None 3,280,814,003 6,492,614,003 49.47% 0.00% 50.53%
CenterPointEnergyInc. 7,736,000,000 None 10,241,627,948 17,977,627,948 43.03% 0.00% 56.97%
CMSEnergyCorp. 9,912,000,000 37,000,000 11,141,672,000 21,090,672,000 47.00% 0.18% 52.83%
DTEEnergyCo. 9,903,000,000 None 17,080,408,797 26,983,408,797 36.70% 0.00% 63.30%
EntergyCorp. 13,887,000,000 233,200,000 12,406,397,800 26,526,597,800 52.35% 0.88% 46.77%
MGEEnergyInc. 388,100,000 None 2,097,436,385 2,485,536,385 15.61% 0.00% 84.39%
NorthwesternCorp. 1,819,400,000 None 2,771,106,992 4,590,506,992 39.63% 0.00% 60.37%
OGEEnergyCorp. 2,505,200,000 None 6,398,482,806 8,903,682,806 28.14% 0.00% 71.86%
OtterTailCorp. 460,800,000 None 1,527,533,175 1,988,333,175 23.18% 0.00% 76.82%
VectrenCorp. 1,713,800,000 None 4,130,147,051 5,843,947,051 29.33% 0.00% 70.67%
WECEnergyGroup 9,088,100,000 30,400,000 17,491,510,711 26,610,010,711 34.15% 0.11% 65.73%
XcelEnergyInc. 13,403,000,000 None 20,927,655,154 34,330,655,154 39.04% 0.00% 60.96%
Weselectedthemediancapitalstructureastheindicatedcapitalstructure,roundingto36%debt,64%equity.
Notes:
DatadownloadedfromValueLine.
IndicatedRateofDebt
LongTerm
Company DebtRating
DebtRate
AlleteInc. A3 4.27
AlliantEnergyCorp. Baa1 4.79
AmerenCorp. Baa1 4.79
AmericanElectricPowerCompanyInc. Baa1 4.79
BlackHillsCorp. Baa2 4.79
CenterPointEnergyInc. Baa2 4.79
CMSEnergyCorp. Baa2 4.79
DTEEnergyCo. Baa1 4.79
EntergyCorp. Baa3 4.79
MGEEnergyInc. A1 4.27
NorthwesternCorp. A3 4.27
OGEEnergyCorp. A3 4.27
OtterTailCorp. A3 4.27
VectrenCorp. N/A N/A
WECEnergyGroup A3 4.27
XcelEnergyInc. A3 4.27
Mean 4.55
Median 4.79
IndicatedRateofDebt 4.79%
Weestimatedthecostofdebtat4.27%for7oftheguidelinecompaniesand4.79%for8oftheguidelinecompanies.
Therefore,themedianisalsothemode.Weplacedthemostrelianceonthemediantoarriveattheindicatedrateofdebt.
PublicUtilityBondYieldAveragesfromMergentBondRecord,January2017Edition
PublicUitlityBondAverages,December2016
Notes:
CompanieswithBB(S&P)orBa(Mergent's)Bondratingsorlesswereexcludedfromthedata.
Notratedcompaniesalsoexcluded.
IndicatedRateofEquity
Model Rate
CAPMExPost 7.79%
CAPMSupplySide 7.09%
CAPMExAnte 6.77%
CAPMDamodaran 6.89%
CAPMDuff&Phelps 7.46%
EmpiricalCAPMExPost 8.27%
EmipricalCAPMSupplySide 7.51%
EmpiricalCAPMExAnte 7.16%
EmpiricalCAPMDamodaran 7.29%
EmpiricalCAPMDuff&Phelps 7.85%
DGMDividendGrowth 9.00%
DGMEarningsGrowth 9.30%
MultiStageDGM 8.84%
IndicatedRateofEquity 8.44%
Weestablishedarangeofacceptabilityforthecostofequitywithallavailablemodels.Weconsideredallofthedata
andplacedthemostrelianceontheDividendGrowthModel,EarningsGrowth.Thedepartmentplacedsecondary
relianceontheCapitalAssetPricingModelsusingDr.Damodaran'sandtheExPostequityriskpremiums.
DirectRateandGrowth
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
DebtComponent 36.00% 4.79% 1.72%
EquityComponent 64.00% 5.43% 3.48%
DirectRate 5.20%
ElectricUtilityDirectRate 5.20%
YieldRate 7.13%
DirectRate 5.20%
ImpliedIndustryGrowthRate 1.93%
CapitalAssetPricingModel(CAPM)
CAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
Model4 Premium5
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72
=IndustryRiskPremium 5.00% 4.30% 3.98% 4.10% 3.96%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2017asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(and
shouldbeusedinconjunctionwith)a3.5%normalizedriskfreerate.2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
EmpiricalCapitalAssetPricingModel(ECAPM)
ECAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
4 5
Model Premium
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72
x75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
=IndustryRiskPremium(weighted) 3.75% 3.22% 2.99% 3.07% 2.97%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2017asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(andshould
beusedinconjunctionwith)a3.5%normalizedriskfreerate.2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
DividendGrowthModel
DGMDividendGrowth,IndicatedRate 9.00%
DGMEarningsGrowth,IndicatedRate 9.30%
WeplacedmorerelianceonthemediantoarriveattheindicatedratesforDGMEarningsGrowthandDGMDividendGrowth.
Notes:
DividendYieldandgrowthratesprovidedbyValueLine
MultiStageDividendGrowthModel
KE=(D1/P0)+0.67(G1)+0.33(g)
Where:
KECostofEquity G1GrowthEstimate,nextfiveyears
D1/P0DividendYield gStableGrowth
G1Growth
D1/P0 gStable
Company Estimate,next 0.67xG1 .33xg KECostofEquity
DividendYield Growth
fiveyears
CMSEnergyCorp. 3.30% 6.00% 4.60% 4.02% 1.52% 8.84%
DTEEnergyCo. 3.50% 6.00% 4.60% 4.02% 1.52% 9.04%
EntergyCorp. 5.10% 0.50% 4.60% 0.34% 1.52% 6.95%
MGEEnergyInc. 2.00% 7.00% 4.60% 4.69% 1.52% 8.21%
NorthwesternCorp. 3.60% 6.50% 4.60% 4.36% 1.52% 9.47%
OGEEnergyCorp. 3.90% 3.00% 4.60% 2.01% 1.52% 7.43%
OtterTailCorp. 3.30% 6.00% 4.60% 4.02% 1.52% 8.84%
VectrenCorp. 3.40% 9.00% 4.60% 6.03% 1.52% 10.95%
WECEnergyGroup 3.80% 6.00% 4.60% 4.02% 1.52% 9.34%
XcelEnergyInc. 3.50% 5.50% 4.60% 3.69% 1.52% 8.70%
Mean 8.78%
Median 8.84%
MultiStageDGM,IndicatedRate 8.84%
Weplacedthemostrelianceonthemediantoarriveattheindicatedrate.
Notes:
DividendYieldprovidedbyValueLine
GrowthEstimates,Next5YearsforEarningsprovidedValueLine
EquityComponentoftheDirectRate
ValueLine
Company
P/ERatio
AlleteInc. 21.4
AlliantEnergyCorp. 22.1
AmerenCorp. 17.9
AmericanElectricPowerCompanyInc. 14.5
BlackHillsCorp. 19.0
CenterPointEnergyInc. 18.6
CMSEnergyCorp. 19.4
DTEEnergyCo. 18.2
EntergyCorp. 15.7
MGEEnergyInc. 26.2
NorthwesternCorp. 16.5
OGEEnergyCorp. 16.3
OtterTailCorp. 24.6
VectrenCorp. 19.3
WECEnergyGroup 18.2
XcelEnergyInc. 18.1
Mean 19.13
Median 18.40
SelectedPricetoEarnings(P/E)Ratio 18.40
IndicatedEquityComponentoftheDirectRate 5.43%
Weplacedthemostrelianceonthemedianpricetoearningsratio.
Notes:
ThePrice/EarningsRatiowasdownloadedfromValueLine.
*TrailingP/ERatio
BetaAnalysis
Company Beta
AlleteInc. 0.75
AlliantEnergyCorp. 0.70
AmerenCorp. 0.65
AmericanElectricPowerCompanyInc. 0.65
BlackHillsCorp. 0.90
CenterPointEnergyInc. 0.85
CMSEnergyCorp. 0.65
DTEEnergyCo. 0.65
EntergyCorp. 0.65
MGEEnergyInc. 0.70
NorthwesternCorp. 0.70
OGEEnergyCorp. 0.90
OtterTailCorp. 0.85
VectrenCorp. 0.75
WECEnergyGroup 0.60
XcelEnergyInc. 0.60
ElectricBetaMean 0.72
ElectricBetaMedian 0.70
UnleveredandReleveredMean* 0.72
IndicatedBeta 0.72
Weconsideredthemean,median,andunlevered/releveredmean.Weplacedmorerelianceonthemean
whenselectingtheindicatedbeta.
Notes:
*SeetheUnleveringReleveringBetapageforthecalculation
Unlevering/ReleveringBetas
ValueLine CapitalStructureTabofCapRate CapitalStructureTabofCapRate ValueLine Formula
ActualEquityinCapital LeveredBeta Unlevered
UnleveringofBetas ActualIncomeTaxRate ActualDebtinCapitalStructure
Structure (Published) Beta
AlleteInc. 13.00% 30.50% 69.50% 0.75 0.54
AlliantEnergyCorp. 15.00% 30.72% 66.06% 0.70 0.50
AmerenCorp. 36.00% 35.29% 63.95% 0.65 0.48
AmericanElectricPowerCompanyInc. 36.00% 37.20% 62.80% 0.65 0.47
BlackHillsCorp. 34.00% 49.47% 50.53% 0.90 0.55
CenterPointEnergyInc. 37.00% 43.03% 56.97% 0.85 0.58
CMSEnergyCorp. 34.00% 47.00% 52.83% 0.65 0.41
DTEEnergyCo. 26.00% 36.70% 63.30% 0.65 0.45
EntergyCorp. 12.50% 52.35% 46.77% 0.65 0.33
MGEEnergyInc. 35.00% 15.61% 84.39% 0.70 0.62
NorthwesternCorp. Nil 39.63% 60.37% 0.70 N/A
OGEEnergyCorp. 29.00% 28.14% 71.86% 0.90 0.70
OtterTailCorp. 25.00% 23.18% 76.82% 0.85 0.69
VectrenCorp. 35.00% 29.33% 70.67% 0.75 0.59
WECEnergyGroup 38.00% 34.15% 65.73% 0.60 0.45
XcelEnergyInc. 35.00% 39.04% 60.96% 0.60 0.42
Average 0.72
CalculationofMarkettoBookRatiosfortheElectricMarketSegment
December31,2016calendaryearinformationfortheJanuary2,2017Assessment
Amarkettobookratiooveronewouldbeanindicationofnoobsolescence.
MarketValueestimatesforCommonEquityarefromValueLine.MarketValueEstimatesforLongTermDebtarefromthecompany's10K.
BookValueamountsarefromthecompany's10K.
MarkettoBookRatioforEquity
MarketValueof BookValueof
Marketto
Company CommonEquity CommonEquity Source
BookRatio
fromValueLine from10K
AlleteInc. 3,095,870,393 1,893,000,000 1.64 201610K,page71
AlliantEnergyCorp. 8,208,215,442 3,862,000,000 2.13 201610K,page65
AmerenCorp. 11,971,600,933 7,103,000,000 1.69 201610K,page31
MarkettoBookRatioforDebt
MarketValueof BookValueLong
Marketto
Company LongTermDebt TermDebtfrom Source
BookRatio
from10K 10K
AlleteInc. 1,653,800,000 1,569,100,000 1.05 201610K,page103
AlliantEnergyCorp. 4,336,100,000 4,315,600,000 1.00 201610K,page115
AmerenCorp. 7,772,000,000 7,276,000,000 1.07 201610K,page112
AmericanElectricPowerCompanyInc. 22,211,900,000 20,391,200,000 1.09 201610K,page236
BlackHillsCorp. 3,351,305,000 3,216,932,000 1.04 201610K,page171
CenterPointEnergyInc. 8,443,000,000 8,846,000,000 0.95 201610K,page103
CMSEnergyCorp. 9,089,000,000 8,640,000,000 1.05 201610K,page83
DTEEnergyCo. 11,905,000,000 11,270,000,000 1.06 201610K,page108
EntergyCorp. 14,815,535,000 14,467,655,000 1.02 201610K,page129
MGEEnergyInc. 430,122,000 391,242,000 1.10 201610K,page79
NorthwesternCorp. 1,852,052,000 1,793,338,000 1.03 201610K,pageF24
OGEEnergyCorp. 2,803,900,000 2,530,800,000 1.11 201610K,page61
OtterTailCorp. 538,542,000 583,835,000 0.92 201610K,page110
VectrenCorp. 1,835,800,000 1,714,000,000 1.07 201610K,page103
WECEnergyGroup 9,818,200,000 9,285,800,000 1.06 201610K,page115
XcelEnergyInc. 15,513,209,000 14,450,247,000 1.07 201610K,page131
Average 1.04
ApplicationofCapitalStructureasdeterminedintheCapitalizationRateStudy
CapitalStructure MarkettoBook Composite
CommonEquity 64.00% 2.16 1.38
LongtermDebt 36.00% 1.04 0.38
OverallMarkettoBookRatio 1.76
DebtRatingAnalysis
Yieldto 52Week
Maturity Coupon 52Week Sales Current
Company Ticker CUSIP Issue Callable S&PIndustry Maturity High
Date % LowPrice Price Yield
% Price
CenterPointEnergyInc. CNP 15189TAL1 SrNtConv144a 1/15/2024 Yes MultiUtilities 2.88 N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
CMSEnergyCorp. CMS 125896AT7 SrNtConv 7/15/2023 Yes MultiUtilities 3.38 N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
CMSEnergyCorp. CMS 125896BA7 SrNt 7/17/2017 Yes MultiUtilities 6.55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
AmerenUnElec N/A 02360FAA4 SrSecdNts 10/1/2019 Yes N/A 5.10 2.15 N/A 0 107.79 4.73
AmerenUnElec N/A 02360FAB2 SrSecdNt 8/1/2037 Yes N/A 5.30 3.99 N/A 0 118.23 4.48
VectrenUtilHldgsInc. N/A 92239MAG6 SrNt 12/1/2035 Yes N/A 6.10 5.00 N/A 0 113.32 5.38
VectrenUtilHldgsInc. N/A 92239MAH4 InsdNt 10/1/2036 Yes N/A 5.95 5.94 100 100.00 100.00 5.95
WisconsinElectricPower N/A 976656BP2 Debs 6/1/2028 No N/A 6.5 3.95 N/A 0 123.17 5.27
WisconsinElectricPower N/A 976656BL1 Deb 12/1/2095 No N/A 6.88 5.16 131.72 131.72 132.63 5.18
WisconsinEnergyCorp. N/A 976657AH9 2007SerAJrSubNt 5/15/2067 Yes N/A 6.25 7.28 87.62 87.62 86.15 7.25
WisconsinElectricPower N/A 976656BZ0 Deb 12/1/2036 Yes N/A 5.7 4.07 121.48 121.48 122.03 4.67
XcelEnergyInc. XEL 98389BAH3 SrNt 7/1/2036 Yes Electric 6.50 4.49 N/A 0 125.84 5.16
Companiesnotavailable:
AlleteInc.
AlliantEnergyCorp.
AmerenCorp.
AmericanElectricPowerCompanyInc.
BlackHillsCorp.
DTEEnergyCo.
EntergyCorp.
MGEEnergyInc.
NorthwesternCorp.
OGEEnergyCorp.
OtterTailCorp.
VectrenCorp.
WECEnergyGroup
XcelEnergyInc.
DatacompiledfromS&PCapitalIQMcGrawHillFinancialonJanuary9,2017
YieldRate
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
LongTermDebt 26.00% 4.53% 1.18%
CommonEquity 74.00% 7.61% 5.63%
YieldRate 6.81%
GasDistributionYieldRate 6.81%
CapitalStructure
Valueof
ValueofLong Valueof TotalMarket %Long %Preferred %Common
Company Preferred
TermDebt CommonEquity Value TermDebt Equity Equity
Equity
AtmosEnergyCorp. 2,205,600,000 None 7,564,277,977 9,769,877,977 22.58% N/A 77.42%
ChesapeakeUtilitiesCorp. 143,500,000 None 1,074,246,510 1,217,746,510 11.78% N/A 88.22%
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. 50,400,000 None 183,237,000 233,637,000 21.57% N/A 78.43%
NewJerseyResourcesCorp. 967,800,000 None 2,886,034,380 3,853,834,380 25.11% N/A 74.89%
NiSourceInc. 6,096,200,000 None 7,064,729,895 13,160,929,895 46.32% N/A 53.68%
NorthwestNaturalGasCo. 530,200,000 None 1,596,971,960 2,127,171,960 24.93% N/A 75.07%
RGCResourcesInc. 32,800,000 None 119,441,700 152,241,700 21.54% N/A 78.46%
SouthJerseyIndustries 808,700,000 None 2,618,794,235 3,427,494,235 23.59% N/A 76.41%
SpireInc. 1,833,700,000 None 2,995,047,901 4,828,747,901 37.97% N/A 62.03%
WGLHoldingsInc. 1,194,300,000 28,200,000 3,399,049,089 4,621,549,089 25.84% 0.61% 73.55%
Weselectedthemeancapitalstructureastheindicatedcapitalstructure,roundingto26%debt,74%equity.
Notes:
DatadownloadedfromValueLine.
IndicatedRateofDebt
LongTerm
Company DebtRating
DebtRate
AtmosEnergyCorp. A2 4.27
ChesapeakeUtilitiesCorp. N/A N/A
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. N/A N/A
NewJerseyResourcesCorp. N/A N/A
NiSourceInc. (P)Ba1 7.21 *
NorthwestNaturalGasCo. (P)A3 4.27
RGCResourcesInc. N/A N/A
SouthJerseyIndustries BBB+ 4.79
SpireInc. Baa2 4.79
WGLHoldingsInc. A3 4.27
Mean 4.93
Median 4.53
IndicatedRateofDebt 4.53%
Weplacedmostrelianceonthemedianwhenselectingtheindicatedrateofdebt.
PublicUtilityBondYieldAveragesfromMergentBondRecord,January2017Edition
PublicUitlityBondAverages,December2016
Notes:
Notratedcompaniesorcompanieswho'sdebtratwasnotavailablewereexcluded.
*ThesecompaniesareratedbelowtheMergentBondRecordBondYieldAverages.Weanalyzedthe
MergentBondRecord,January2017issue,forU.S.CorporateBondsthatwereconsideredbelow
investmentgrade.WedeterminedtheaverageBayieldtomaturityis7.21%.
IndicatedRateofEquity
Model Rate
CAPMExPost 7.65%
CAPMSupplySide 6.97%
CAPMExAnte 6.66%
CAPMDamodaran 6.77%
CAPMDuff&Phelps 7.35%
EmpiricalCAPMExPost 8.17%
EmpiricalCAPMSupplySide 7.42%
EmpiricalCAPMExAnte 7.08%
EmpiricalCAPMDamodaran 7.20%
EmpiricalCAPMDuff&Phelps 7.76%
DGMDividendGrowth 6.50%
DGMEarningsGrowth 7.90%
MultiStageDGM 7.76%
IndicatedRateofEquity 7.61%
Weestablishedarangeofacceptabilityforthecostofequitywithallavailablemodels.We
consideredallofthedataandplacedthemostrelianceontheDividendGrowthModel,Earnings
Growth.ThedepartmentplacedsecondaryrelianceontheCapitalAssetPricingModelsusingDr.
Damodaran'sandtheExPostequityriskpremiums.
DirectRateandGrowth
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
DebtComponent 26.00% 4.53% 1.18%
EquityComponent 74.00% 4.76% 3.52%
DirectRate 4.70%
GasDistributionDirectRate 4.70%
YieldRate 6.81%
DirectRate 4.70%
ImpliedIndustryGrowthRate 2.11%
CapitalAssetPricingModel(CAPM)
CAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
Model4 Premium5
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
=IndustryRiskPremium 4.86% 4.18% 3.87% 3.98% 3.85%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2017asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(and
shouldbeusedinconjunctionwith)a3.5%normalizedriskfreerate.2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
EmpiricalCapitalAssetPricingModel(ECAPM)
ECAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
4 5
Model Premium
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
x75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
=IndustryRiskPremium(weighted) 3.64% 3.13% 2.90% 2.99% 2.89%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2017asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(andshould
beusedinconjunctionwith)a3.5%normalizedriskfreerate.2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
DividendGrowthModel
CostofCapital CostofCapital
Current ProjEarnings ProjDividend
Earnings Dividend
Company Dividend GrowthRate GrowthRate
GrowthDY Growth
Yield(DY) 5Year(EG) 5Year(DG)
+EG DY+DG
AtmosEnergyCorp. 2.50% 6.50% 6.50% 9.00% 9.00%
ChesapeakeUtilitiesCorp. 1.90% 8.50% 6.00% 10.40% 7.90%
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. 3.20% N/A N/A N/A N/A
NewJerseyResourcesCorp. 3.00% 3.00% 3.50% 6.00% 6.50%
NiSourceInc. 3.00% 1.50% 2.50% 4.50% 0.50%
NorthwestNaturalGasCo. 3.20% 7.00% 2.00% 10.20% 5.20%
RGCResourcesInc. 3.20% N/A N/A N/A N/A
SouthJerseyIndustries 3.30% 3.00% 6.50% 6.30% 9.80%
SpireInc. 3.20% 9.00% 3.50% 12.20% 6.70%
WGLHoldingsInc. 2.90% 3.50% 2.50% 6.40% 5.40%
DGMDividendGrowth,IndicatedRate 6.50%
DGMEarningsGrowth,IndicatedRate 7.90%
WeplacedequalrelianceonthemeanandmediantoarriveattheindicatedratesforDGMEarningsGrowthandDGMDividend
Growth,roundingtothenearesttenth.
Notes:
DividendYieldprovidedbyValueLine
DeltaNaturalGasandRGCResources,Inc.donothaveanalystsestimatesand,therefore,thecompanieswerenotincludedinthemean,
median,ormodel.Theyarestillshown.
NiSourcewasnotincludedinthemean,median,ormodelbecausetheyareconsideredanoutlier.
MultiStageDividendGrowthModel
KE=(D1/P0)+0.67(G1)+0.33(g)
Where:
KECostofEquity G1GrowthEstimate,nextfiveyears
D1/P0DividendYield gStableGrowth
G1Growth
D1/P0 gStable
Company Estimate,next 0.67xG1 .33xg KECostofEquity
DividendYield Growth
fiveyears
AtmosEnergyCorp. 2.50% 6.50% 4.60% 4.36% 1.52% 8.37%
ChesapeakeUtilitiesCorp. 1.90% 8.50% 4.60% 5.70% 1.52% 9.11%
NewJerseyResourcesCorp. 3.00% 3.00% 4.60% 2.01% 1.52% 6.53%
NiSourceInc. 3.00% 1.50% 4.60% 1.01% 1.52% 5.52%
NorthwestNaturalGasCo. 3.20% 7.00% 4.60% 4.69% 1.52% 9.41%
SouthJerseyIndustries 3.30% 3.00% 4.60% 2.01% 1.52% 6.83%
SpireInc. 3.20% 9.00% 4.60% 6.03% 1.52% 10.75%
WGLHoldingsInc. 2.90% 3.50% 4.60% 2.35% 1.52% 6.76%
Mean 7.91%
Median 7.60%
MultiStageDGM,IndicatedRate 7.76%
Weplacedequalrelianceonthemeanandmediantoarriveattheindicatedrate.
Notes:
DividendYieldprovidedbyValueLine
GrowthEstimates,Next5YearsforEarningsprovidedValueLine
WeremovedthebelowcompaniesbecausetheydonothavegrowthestimatesavailabethroughValueLine
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. 3.20% N/A 4.60% N/A 1.52% N/A
RGCResourcesInc. 3.20% N/A 4.60% N/A 1.52% N/A
EquityComponentoftheDirectRate
ValueLine
Company
P/ERatio
AtmosEnergyCorp. 20.80
ChesapeakeUtilitiesCorp. 23.90
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. 32.20 *
NewJerseyResourcesCorp. 19.70
NiSourceInc. 20.80
NorthwestNaturalGasCo. 26.30
RGCResourcesInc. 20.50 *
SouthJerseyIndustries 22.40
SpireInc. 18.80
WGLHoldingsInc. 19.80
Mean 22.52
Median 20.80
SelectedPricetoEarnings(P/E)Ratio 21.00
IndicatedEquityComponentoftheDirectRate 4.76%
Weplacedthemostrelianceonthemedianpricetoearningsratio.
Notes:
ThePrice/EarningsRatiowasdownloadedfromValueLine.
* TrailingP/ERatio
BetaAnalysis
Company Beta
AtmosEnergyCorp. 0.70
ChesapeakeUtilitiesCorp. 0.65
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. 0.65
NewJerseyResourcesCorp. 0.80
NiSourceInc. NMF
NorthwestNaturalGasCo. 0.65
RGCResourcesInc. 0.45
SouthJerseyIndustries 0.80
SpireInc. 0.70
WGLHoldingsInc. 0.75
ElectricBetaMean 0.68
ElectricBetaMedian 0.70
UnleveredandReleveredMean* 0.69
IndicatedBeta 0.70
Weconsideredthemean,median,andunlevered/releveredmean.Weplacedmorerelianceonthemedianwhen
selectingtheindicatedbetatoaccountforthewiderangeofbetas.
Notes:
* SeetheUnleveringReleveringBetapageforthecalculation
Unlevering/ReleveringBetas
ValueLine CapitalStructureTabofCapRate CapitalStructureTabofCapRate ValueLine Formula
UnleveringofBetas ActualIncomeTaxRate ActualDebtinCapitalStructure ActualEquityinCapitalStructure LeveredBeta(Published) UnleveredBeta
AtmosEnergyCorp. 36.40% 22.58% 77.42% 0.70 0.59
ChesapeakeUtilitiesCorp. 40.00% 11.78% 88.22% 0.65 0.60
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. 37.90% 21.57% 78.43% 0.65 0.56
NewJerseyResourcesCorp. 32.00% 25.11% 74.89% 0.80 0.65
NiSourceInc. 33.50% 46.32% 53.68% NMF N/A
NorthwestNaturalGasCo. 35.00% 24.93% 75.07% 0.65 0.53
RGCResourcesInc. 38.40% 21.54% 78.46% 0.45 0.38
SouthJerseyIndustries 25.00% 23.59% 76.41% 0.80 0.65
SpireInc. 32.50% 37.97% 62.03% 0.70 0.50
WGLHoldingsInc. 39.00% 25.84% 73.55% 0.75 0.62
Average 0.68
DebtRatingAnalysis
Yieldto 52Week
Maturity S&P Coupon 52Week Sales Current
Company Ticker CUSIP Issue Callable Maturity High
Date Industry % LowPrice Price Yield
% Price
AtmosEnergyCorp. ATO 049560AA3 Deb 7/15/2028 Yes GasUtilities 6.75 3.89 118.73 118.73 122.21 5.52
AtmosEnergyCorp. ATO 049560AG0 SrNt 10/15/2034 Yes GasUtilities 5.95 4.25 114.86 114.86 120.90 4.92
AtmosEnergyCorp. ATO 049560AH8 SrNt 6/15/2017 Yes GasUtilities 6.35 1.42 102.29 102.29 101.38 6.26
Insd
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. DGAS 247748AG1 Quarterly 4/1/2021 Yes GasUtilities 5.75 5.74 N/A 0 100.00 5.75
NtIqNts
GtdFxdRt
NiSourceFinance N/A 65473QAQ6 9/15/2017 Yes N/A 5.25 2.09 102.31 102.31 101.67 5.16
SrNt
GtdFxdRt
NiSourceFinance N/A 65473QAR4 9/15/2020 Yes N/A 5.45 2.64 109.08 109.08 109.41 4.98
SrNt
MTNSeries
SouthJerseyGas N/A 83851MAK3 7/15/2017 No N/A 4.66 3.66 N/A 0 100.35 4.64
B20033
MTNSeries
SouthJerseyGas N/A 83851MAM9 7/15/2033 No N/A 5.55 4.63 110.43 110.43 110.38 5.02
B20034
DatacompiledfromS&PCapitalIQMcGrawHillFinancialonMarch6,2017
CalculationofMarkettoBookRatiosfortheElectricMarketSegment
December31,2016calendaryearinformationfortheJanuary2,2017Assessment
Amarkettobookratiooveronewouldbeanindicationofnoobsolescence.
MarketValueestimatesarefromtheCapitalStructurepageoftheCapitalizationRateStudy.
BookValueamountsarefromthecompany'sbalancesheetaslistedinthe10KorAnnualReport
MarkettoBookRatioforEquity
MarketValueof
BookValueof MarkettoBook
Company CommonEquity Source
CommonEquity Ratio
fromValueLine
AtmosEnergyCorp. 7,564,277,977 3,463,059,000 2.18 201610K,page35 FiscalYearEnd9/30/2016
ChesapeakeUtilitiesCorp. 1,074,246,510 446,086,000 2.41 201610K,page24
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. 183,237,000 77,726,969 2.36 201610K,page41 FiscalYearEnd6/30/2016
NewJerseyResourcesCorp. 2,886,034,380 1,166,591,000 2.47 201610K,page27 FiscalYearEnd9/30/2016
NiSourceInc. 7,064,729,895 4,071,200,000 1.74 201610K,page19
NorthwestNaturalGasCo. 1,596,971,960 850,497,000 1.88 201610K,page56
RGCResourcesInc. 119,441,700 23,941,445 4.99 201610K,page34 FiscalYearEnd6/30/2016
SouthJerseyIndustries 2,618,794,235 1,289,240,000 2.03 201610K,page57
SpireInc. 2,995,047,901 1,768,200,000 1.69 201610K,page60 FiscalYearEnd9/30/2016
WGLHoldingsInc. 3,399,049,089 574,496,000 5.92 201610K,page78 FiscalYearEnd9/30/2016
Average 2.77
MarkettoBookRatioforDebt
MarketValueof
BookValueLong MarkettoBook
Company LongTermDebt Source
TermDebt Ratio
from10K
AtmosEnergyCorp. 2,844,990,000 2,460,000,000 1.16 201610K,page95
ChesapeakeUtilitiesCorp. 161,500,000 145,900,000 1.11 201610K,page78
DeltaNaturalGasCo.Inc. 55,324,000 50,422,796 1.10 201610K,page41&49
NewJerseyResourcesCorp. 1,131,077,000 1,082,845,000 1.04 201610K,page98
NiSourceInc. 7,064,100,000 6,421,300,000 1.1 201610K,page89
NorthwestNaturalGasCo. 793,339,000 679,334,000 1.17 201610K,page71
RGCResourcesInc. 36,163,523 33,896,200 1.07 201610K,page60
SouthJerseyIndustries 1,080,800,000 1,039,914,000 1.04 201610K,page76
SpireInc. 2,083,700,000 2,257,100,000 0.92 201610K,page96
WGLHoldingsInc. 1,641,900,000 1,446,000,000 1.14 201610K,page66
Average 1.09
ApplicationofCapitalStructureasdeterminedintheCapitalizationRateStudy
CapitalStructure MarkettoBook Composite
CommonEquity 74.00% 2.77 2.05
LongtermDebt 26.00% 1.09 0.28
OverallMarkettoBookRatio 2.33
YieldRate
GasTransmissionPipelineYieldRate 8.96%
CapitalStructure
Valueof %Long
ValueofLong Valueof TotalMarket %Preferred %Common
Company Preferred Term
TermDebt CommonEquity Value Equity Equity
Equity Debt
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP 3,626,800,000 N/A 4,322,625,425 7,949,425,425 45.62% N/A 54.38%
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP 21,121,200,000 N/A 53,909,536,466 75,030,736,466 28.15% N/A 71.85%
KinderMorganInc. 36,700,000,000 N/A 49,178,984,956 85,878,984,956 42.73% N/A 57.27%
ONEOKPartnersLP 6,691,700,000 N/A 12,013,276,531 18,704,976,531 35.77% N/A 64.23%
TCPipeLinesLP 1,896,000,000 N/A 3,617,046,000 5,513,046,000 34.39% N/A 65.61%
WilliamsPartnersLP 18,918,000,000 N/A 22,263,446,418 41,181,446,418 45.94% N/A 54.06%
Weselectedthemediancapitalstructureastheindicatedcapitalstructureduetothelargerangeofvalues,roundingto39%debt,61%equity.
Notes:
DatadownloadedfromValueLine.
IndicatedRateofDebt
LongTerm
Company DebtRating
DebtRate
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP Baa3 4.85
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP N/A N/A
KinderMorganInc. Baa3 4.85
ONEOKPartnersLP Baa2 4.85
TCPipeLinesLP Baa2 4.85
WilliamsPartnersLP Baa3 4.85
Mean 4.85
Median 4.85
IndicatedRateofDebt 4.85%
Weestimatedthattheguidelinecompanieshavethesamecostofdebt.
IndustrialBondYieldAveragesfromMergentBondRecord,January2017Edition
IndustrialBondAverages,December2016
Notes:
CompanieswithBB(S&P)orBa(Mergent's)Bondratingsorlesswereexcludedfromthedata.
Notratedcompaniesalsoexcluded.
IndicatedRateofEquity
Model Rate
CAPMExPost 10.42%
CAPMSupplySide 9.36%
CAPMExAnte 8.87%
CAPMDamodaran 9.05%
CAPMDuff&Phelps 9.55%
EmpiricalCAPMExPost 10.25%
EmpiricalCAPMSupplySide 9.21%
EmpiricalCAPMExAnte 8.73%
EmpiricalCAPMDamodaran 8.91%
EmpricalCAPMDuff&Phelps 9.41%
DividendGrowthModel 13.45%
MultiStageDGM 12.87%
IndicatedRateofEquity 11.59%
Weestablishedarangeofacceptabilityforthecostofequitywithallavailablemodels.Weconsideredallofthe
dataandplacedthemostrelianceontheDividendGrowthModel.Thedepartmentplacedsecondaryrelianceon
theCapitalAssetPricingModelsusingDr.Damodaran'sandtheExPostequityriskpremiums.
DirectRateandGrowth
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
DebtComponent 39.00% 4.85% 1.89%
EquityComponent 61.00% 8.55% 5.22%
DirectRate 7.11%
GasTransmissionDirectRate 7.11%
YieldRate 8.96%
DirectRate 7.11%
ImpliedIndustryGrowthRate 1.85%
CapitalAssetPricingModel(CAPM)
CAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
4 5
Model Premium
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
=IndustryRiskPremium 7.63% 6.57% 6.08% 6.26% 6.05%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2016asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(andshouldbeusedin
conjunctionwith)a4.0%normalizedriskfreerate.2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
EmpiricalCapitalAssetPricingModel(ECAPM)
ECAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
4 5
Model Premium
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
x75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
=IndustryRiskPremium(weighted) 5.73% 4.93% 4.56% 4.69% 4.54%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2016asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(andshould
beusedinconjunctionwith)a4.0%normalizedriskfreerate.2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
DividendGrowthModel
Current Growth
IndicatedCost
Company Dividend Estimate,
ofEquity
Yield(DY) Next5Years
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP 2.30% 15.30% 17.60%
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP 6.30% 5.67% 11.97%
TCPipeLinesLP 6.90% 6.00% 12.90%
WilliamsPartnersLP 9.10% 4.00% 13.10%
DividendGrowthModel,IndicatedRate 13.45%
Weplacedequalrelianceonthemeanandmedianwhenselectingtheindicatedrate.
Notes:
DividendYieldprovidedbyValueLine
GrowthEstimates,Next5YearsforEarningsprovidedYahoo!Finance
KinderMorganInc.andWilliamsPartnersLParenotincludedintheabovecalculation(eventhoughtheyareshown)because
analysts'estimateswerenotavailable.
ONEOKPartners,L.P.isnotincludedintheabovecalculationbecausetheyareconsideredanoutlier.
WeremovedONEOKPartnersLPandKinderMoganInc.becausetheyareoutliers:
MultiStageDividendGrowthModel
KE=(D1/P0)+0.67(G1)+0.33(g)
Where:
KECostofEquity G1GrowthEstimate,nextfiveyears
D1/P0DividendYield gStableGrowth
G1Growth
D1/P0 gStable
Company Estimate,next 0.67xG1 .33xg KECostofEquity
DividendYield Growth
fiveyears
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP 2.30% 15.30% 4.60% 10.25% 1.52% 14.07%
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP 6.30% 5.67% 4.60% 3.80% 1.52% 11.62%
TCPipeLinesLP 6.90% 6.00% 4.60% 4.02% 1.52% 12.44%
WilliamsPartnersLP 9.10% 4.00% 4.60% 2.68% 1.52% 13.30%
Mean 12.86%
Median 12.87%
MultiStageDGM,IndicatedRate 12.87%
Weplacedequalrelianceonthemeanandmediantoarriveattheindicatedrate.
Notes:
DividendYieldprovidedbyValueLine
GrowthEstimates,Next5YearsforEarningsprovidedYahoo!Finance
Weremovedthebelowtwocompaneisasoutliers.
KinderMorganInc. 2.30% 0.50% 4.60% 0.34% 1.52% 3.48%
ONEOKPartnersLP 7.50% 29.74% 4.60% 19.93% 1.52% 28.94%
EquityComponentoftheDirectRate
ValueLine
Company
P/ERatio
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP 15.30
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP 19.10
ONEOKPartnersLP 17.50
TCPipeLinesLP 13.20 *
WilliamsPartnersLP 26.90
Mean 18.40
Median 17.50
SelectedPricetoEarnings(P/E)Ratio 18.00
SelectedMarginalTaxRate 35.00%
SelectedP/ERatiox(1SelectedMarginalTaxRate) 11.70
IndicatedEquityComponentoftheDirectRate 8.55%
Weplacedequalrelianceonthemeanandmedianpricetoearningsratio.
Notes:
KinderMorganInc.wasremovedfromthisanalysisasitisacoproration,notapartnershipastheotherguidlinecompanies.The
P/Eratioisaffectedbythetaxtreatmentofthecorporateorganization.
ThePricetoEarningsRatiowasdownloadedfromValueLine.
*TrailingP/ERatio
TheearningcomponentoftheaboveP/Eratioshavenotbeenadjustedforincometaxes.WehaveadjustedtheselectedP/Eratio
forincometaxesbymultiplyingtheselectedP/Eratioby1minustheselectedmarginaltaxrate.
BetaAnalysis
Company Beta
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP 0.85
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP 1.15
KinderMorganInc. 1.25
ONEOKPartnersLP 1.05
TCPipeLinesLP 1.00
WilliamsPartnersLP 1.35
BetaMean 1.11
BetaMedian 1.10
UnleveredandReleveredMean* 1.11
IndicatedBeta 1.10
Weconsideredthemeanandmedian,placingmorerelianceonthemedianwhenselectingtheindicatedbeta.We
unleveredandreleveredthebetas(seetheUneleveringReleveringBetapage).However,theincometaxdataisnot
reliableforthismarketsegmentandwedidnotgiveweighttotheunleveredreleveredmean.
Notes:
* SeetheUnleveringReleveringBetapageforthecalculation
Unlevering/ReleveringBetas
ValueLine CapitalStructureTabofCapRate CapitalStructureTabofCapRate ValueLine Formula
ActualIncomeTax ActualDebtinCapital ActualEquityinCapital LeveredBeta UnleveredBeta
UnleveringofBetas Rate Structure Structure (Published)
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP 0.50% 45.62% 54.38% 0.85 0.46
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP 0.50% 28.15% 71.85% 1.15 0.83
KinderMorganInc. 16.00% 42.73% 57.27% 1.25 0.77
ONEOKPartnersLP 1.50% 35.77% 64.23% 1.05 0.68
TCPipeLinesLP 0.00% 34.39% 65.61% 1.00 0.66
WilliamsPartnersLP 1.00% 45.94% 54.06% 1.35 0.73
Average 1.11
DebtRatingAnalysis
Yieldto
Maturity S&P Coupon 52Week 52Week Sales Current
Company Ticker CUSIP Issue Callable Maturity
Date Industry % LowPrice HighPrice Price Yield
%
EnterpriseProdsOper GtdFixed
N/A 293791AP4 10/15/2034 Yes N/A 6.65 4.79 N/A 0 121.89 5.45
LP RtSrNt
JrSubNt
EnterpriseProdsOper
N/A 293791AV1 Fixed/fltg 8/1/2066 Yes N/A 4.74 4.78 94.05 94.05 99.25 4.77
LP
Rate
KinderMorganEnergy
N/A 494550AJ5 Nt 3/15/2031 Yes N/A 7.4 5.4 N/A 0 119.47 6.19
Partners
KinderMorganEnergy
N/A 494550AL0 Nt 3/15/2032 Yes N/A 7.75 5.29 121.95 121.95 125.25 6.18
Partners
KinderMorganEnergy 494550AQ
N/A SrNt 8/15/2033 Yes N/A 7.3 5.51 N/A 0 119.09 6.12
Partners 9
KinderMorganEnergy 494550AW
N/A SrNt 1/15/2038 Yes N/A 6.95 5.52 N/A 0 117.57 5.91
Partners 6
KinderMorganEnergy
N/A 494550AV8 SrNt 2/1/2037 Yes N/A 6.5 5.59 N/A 0 110.73 5.86
Partners
ONEOKInc. OKE 682680AB9 Deb 10/1/2028 Yes N/A 6.88 5.85 109 109 108.50 6.33
ONEOKInc. OKE 682680AN3 FxdRtNt 6/15/2035 Yes N/A 6 5.53 N/A 0 105.25 5.7
SrInsd
ONEOKInc. OKE 682680AA1 Quarterly 9/30/2028 Yes N/A 6.5 6.69 98.61 98.61 98.47 6.6
Nt
SrInsd
ONEOKInc. OKE 682680AD5 Quarterly 2/1/2019 Yes N/A 6.4 6.39 N/A 0 100.00 6.4
Nt
68268NAC
ONEOKPartnersLP OKS GtdSrNt 10/1/2036 Yes N/A 6.65 5.14 113.06 113.06 118.42 5.61
7
Companiesnotavailable:
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP
KinderMorganInc.
TCPipeLinesLP
WilliamsPartnersLP
Companiesnotusedasguidelinecompanies:
EnergyTransfer
ETP 29273RAF6 SrNt 10/15/2036 Yes N/A 6.62 5.51 108 108 113.15 5.85
PartnersLP
SpectraEnergyPartners
NotAvailable
LP
SunocoLogistics
NotAvailable
PartnersLP
DatacompiledfromS&PCapitalIQMcGrawHillFinancialonMarch6,2017
CalculationofMarkettoBookRatiosfortheGasTransmissionMarketSegment
December31,2016calendaryearinformationfortheJanuary2,2017Assessment
Amarkettobookratiooveronewouldbeanindicationofnoobsolescence.
MarketValueestimatesforCommonEquityarefromValueLine.MarketValueEstimatesforLongTermDebtarefromthecompany'sAnnualReportor10K.
BookValueamountsarefromthecompany'sbalancesheetaslistedinthe10KorAnnualReport
MarkettoBookRatioforEquity
MarketValueof BookValueof MarkettoBook
Company Source
CommonEquity CommonEquity Ratio
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP 4,322,625,425 4,530,900,000 0.95 201610K,page45
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP 53,909,536,466 22,266,000,000 2.42 201610K,page62
KinderMorganInc. 49,178,984,956 34,802,000,000 1.41 201610K,page77
ONEOKPartnersLP 12,013,276,531 6,177,820,000 1.94 201610K,page76
TCPipeLinesLP 3,617,046,000 1,146,000,000 3.16 201610K,pageF7
WilliamsPartnersLP 22,263,446,418 21,453,000,000 1.04 201610K,page86
Average 1.82
MarkettoBookRatioforDebt
MarketValueof
BookValueLong MarkettoBook
Company LongTermDebt Source
TermDebt Ratio
from10K
BoardwalkPipelinePartnersLP 3,709,200,000 3,558,900,000 1.04 201610K,page59
EnterpriseProductsPartnersLP 23,697,700,000 23,697,700,000 1.00 201610K,page62,F65
KinderMorganInc. 37,354,000,000 36,205,000,000 1.03 201610K,page101
ONEOKPartnersLP 7,100,000,000 6,698,957,000 1.06 201610K,page90
TCPipeLinesLP 1,908,000,000 1,867,000,000 1.02 201610K,pageF28
WilliamsPartnersLP 18,907,000,000 18,470,000,000 1.02 201610K,page124
Average 1.03
ApplicationofCapitalStructureasdeterminedintheCapitalizationRateStudy
YieldRate
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
LongTermDebt 36.00% 5.79% 2.08%
CommonEquity 64.00% 12.49% 7.99%
YieldRate 10.08%
FluidTransportationPipelineYieldRate 10.08%
CapitalStructure
Valueof
ValueofLong Valueof TotalMarket %Long %Preferred %Common
Company Preferred
TermDebt CommonEquity Value TermDebt Equity Equity
Equity
BuckeyePartnersLP 3,826,900,000 N/A 9,164,932,142 12,991,832,142 29.46% N/A 70.54%
HollyEnergyPartnersLP 1,070,600,000 N/A 1,940,511,090 3,011,111,090 35.55% N/A 64.45%
MagellanMidstreamPartnersLP 4,073,500,000 N/A 15,666,977,742 19,740,477,742 20.64% N/A 79.36%
NuStarEnergyLP 3,153,000,000 N/A 3,778,316,040 6,931,316,040 45.49% N/A 54.51%
PlainsAllAmericanPipeline 9,634,000,000 N/A 13,313,919,802 22,947,919,802 41.98% N/A 58.02%
Weselectedthemediancapitalstructureastheindicatedcapitalstructure,roundingto36%debt,64%equity.
Notes:
DatadownloadedfromValueLine
IndicatedRateofDebt
LongTerm
Company DebtRating
DebtRate
BuckeyePartnersLP Baa3 4.85
HollyEnergyPartnersLP Ba3 7.21 *
MagellanMidstreamPartnersLP Baa1 4.85
NuStarEnergyLP Ba1 7.21 *
PlainsAllAmericanPipeline Baa3 4.85
Mean 5.79
Median 4.85
IndicatedRateofDebt 5.79%
Weusedthemeanwhenselectingtheindicatedrate.
IndustrialBondYieldAveragesfromMergentBondRecord,January2017Edition
IndustrialBondAverages,December2016
Notes:
Notratedcompaniesorcompanieswho'sdebtratingwasnotavailablewereexcluded.
* ThesecompaniesareratedbelowtheMergentBondRecordBondYieldAverages.WeanalyzedtheMergent
BondRecord,January2017issue,forU.S.CorporateBondsthatwereconsideredbelowinvestmentgrade.We
determinedtheaverageBayieldtomaturityis7.21%.
IndicatedRateofEquity
Model Rate
CAPMExPost 10.08%
CAPMSupplySide 9.06%
CAPMExAnte 8.60%
CAPMDamodaran 8.76%
CAPMDuff&Phelps 9.28%
EmpiricalCAPMExPost 9.99%
EmipricalCAPMSupplySide 8.98%
EmpiricalCAPMExAnte 8.53%
EmpiricalCAPMDamodaran 8.69%
EmpiricalCAPMDuff&Phelps 9.21%
DividendGrowthModel 15.55%
MultiStageDGM 14.31%
IndicatedRateofEquity 12.49%
Weestablishedarangeofacceptabilityforthecostofequitywithallavailablemodels.Weconsideredall
ofthedataandplacedthemostrelianceontheDividendGrowthModel,EarningsGrowth.The
departmentplacedsecondaryrelianceontheCapitalAssetPricingModelsusingDr.Damodaran'sandthe
ExPostequityriskpremiums.
DirectRateandGrowth
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
DebtComponent 36.00% 5.79% 2.08%
EquityComponent 64.00% 8.01% 5.13%
DirectRate 7.21%
FluidTransportationPipelineDirectRate 7.21%
YieldCapRate 10.08%
DirectCapRate 7.21%
ImpliedIndustryGrowthRate 2.87%
CapitalAssetPricingModel(CAPM)
CAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
Model4 Premium5
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
=IndustryRiskPremium 7.29% 6.27% 5.81% 5.97% 5.78%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2016asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(and
shouldbeusedinconjunctionwith)a4.0%normalizedriskfreerate.2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
EmpiricalCapitalAssetPricingModel(ECAPM)
ECAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
4 5
Model Premium
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
x75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
=IndustryRiskPremium(weighted) 5.47% 4.70% 4.35% 4.48% 4.33%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2016asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(andshould
beusedinconjunctionwith)a4.0%normalizedriskfreerate.2016ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
Page | D - 7 ECAPM
Fluid Transportation Pipeline 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
January 2, 2017, Assessment
DividendGrowthModel
CurrentDividend GrowthEstimate, IndicatedCostof
Company
Yield Next5Years Equity
BuckeyePartnersLP 7.70% 8.11% 15.81%
HollyEnergyPartnersLP 7.30% 7.70% 15.00%
MagellanMidstreamPartnersLP 5.10% 6.77% 11.87%
PlainsAllAmericanPipeline 6.80% 13.28% 20.08%
DividendGrowthModel,IndicatedRate 15.55%
Weplacedequalrelianceonthemeanandmediantoarriveattheindicatedrate.
Notes:
DividendYieldprovidedbyValueLine
GrowthEstimates,Next5YearsforEarningsprovidedYahoo!Finance
WeremovedNuStarEnergyLPasanoutlier:
MultiStageDividendGrowthModel
KE=[(D1/P0)+0.67(G1)+0.33(g)]
Where:
KECostofEquity G1GrowthEstimate,nextfiveyears
D1/P0DividendYield gStableGrowth
G1Growth
D1/P0 gStable
Company Estimate,next 0.67xG1 .33xg KECostofEquity
DividendYield Growth
fiveyears
BuckeyePartnersLP 7.70% 8.11% 4.60% 5.43% 1.52% 14.65%
HollyEnergyPartnersLP 7.30% 7.70% 4.60% 5.16% 1.52% 13.98%
MagellanMidstreamPartnersLP 5.10% 6.77% 4.60% 4.54% 1.52% 11.15%
PlainsAllAmericanPipeline 6.80% 13.28% 4.60% 8.90% 1.52% 17.22%
Mean 14.25%
Median 14.31%
MultiStageDGM,IndicatedRate 14.31%
Weplacedthemostrelianceonthemediantoarriveattheindicatedrate.
Notes:
DividendYieldprovidedbyValueLine
GrowthEstimates,Next5YearsforEarningsprovidedYahoo!Finance
WeremovedNuStarEnergyLPasanoutlier:
EquityComponentoftheDirectRate
ValueLineP/E
Company
Ratio
BuckeyePartnersLP 15.10
HollyEnergyPartnersLP 18.30 *
MagellanMidstreamPartnersLP 19.30
NuStarEnergyLP 22.00 *
PlainsAllAmericanPipeline 21.10
Mean 19.16
Median 19.30
SelectedPricetoEarnings(P/E)Ratio 19.20
SelectedMarginalTaxRate 35.00%
P/ERatiox(1SelectedMarginalTaxRate) 12.48
IndicatedEquityComponentoftheDirectRate 8.01%
Weplacedequalrelianceonthemedianandmeanswhenselectingthepricetoearningsratio.
Notes:
ThePrice/EarningsRatiowasdownloadedfromValueLine.
*TrailingP/ERatio
TheearningcomponentoftheaboveP/Eratioshavenotbeenadjustedforincometaxes.Wehaveadjustedthe
selectedP/EratioforincometaxesbymultiplyingtheselectedP/Eratioby1minustheselectedmarginaltaxrate.
BetaAnalysis
Company Beta
BuckeyePartnersLP 1.05
HollyEnergyPartnersLP 0.90
MagellanMidstreamPartnersLP 1.05
NuStarEnergyLP 1.05
PlainsAllAmericanPipeline 1.25
BetaMean 1.06
BetaMedian 1.05
UnleveredandReleveredMean* 1.08
IndicatedBeta 1.05
Weconsideredthemeanandmedian,placingmorerelianceonthemedianwhenselectingtheindicatedbetagiven
thewiderangeofbetas.Weunleveredandreleveredthebetas(seetheUnleveringReleveringBetapage).
However,theincometaxdataisnotreliableforthismarketsegmentandwedidnotgivesignificantreliancetothe
unleveredreleveredmean.
Notes:
* SeetheUnleveringReleveringBetapageforthecalculation
Unlevering/ReleveringBetas
DebtRatingAnalysis
Maturity S&P Coupon Yieldto 52Week 52Week Sales Current
Company Ticker CUSIP Issue Callable
Date Industry % Maturity% LowPrice HighPrice Price Yield
Fixed
BuckeyePartnersLP BPL 118230AE1 7/1/2017 Yes N/A 5.12 2.7 N/A 0 100.78 5.08
RtNts
MagellanMidstreamPartnersLP MMP 559080AC0 SrNt 5/1/2037 Yes N/A 6.4 4.98 118.07 118.07 117.81 5.43
PlainsAllAmernPipelineLP N/A 72650RAM4 SrNt 5/15/2036 Yes N/A 6.7 5.79 109.13 109.13 110.35 6.07
NotUsingDuetoMerger
SunocoLogisticsPartnersLP SXL Notavailable
NtFully
Exchang
EnbridgeEnergyPartnersLP EEP 29250RAD8 6/1/2033 Yes N/A 5.95 5.92 96.23 96.23 100.21 5.93
edFrom
Cusip
FixedRt
EnbridgeEnergyPartnersLP EEP 29250RAG1 SrGbl 12/15/2034 Yes N/A 6.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Nts
DatacompiledfromS&PCapitalIQMcGrawHillFinancialonMarch6,2017
CalculationofMarkettoBookRatiosfortheFluidTransportationMarketSegment
December31,2016calendaryearinformationfortheJanuary2,2017Assessment
Amarkettobookratiooveronewouldbeanindicationofnoobsolescence.
MarketValueestimatesforCommonEquityarefromValueLine.MarketValueEstimatesforLongTermDebtarefromthecompany's10K.
BookValueamountsarefromthecompany's10K.
MarkettoBookRatioforEquity
MarketValueof BookValueof MarkettoBook
Company Source
CommonEquity CommonEquity Ratio
BuckeyePartnersLP 9,164,932,142 4,698,423,000 1.95 201610K,page63
HollyEnergyPartnersLP 1,940,511,090 512,110,000 3.79 201610K,page86
MagellanMidstreamPartnersLP 15,666,977,742 2,092,105,000 7.49 201610K,page44
NuStarEnergyLP 3,778,316,040 1,611,617,000 2.34 201610K,page62
PlainsAllAmericanPipeline 13,313,919,802 8,816,000,000 1.51 201610K,page72
Average 3.42
MarkettoBookRatioforDebt
LongtermDebt
BookValueLongTerm MarkettoBook
Company MarketValue Source
Debt Ratio
from10K
BuckeyePartnersLP 4,333,488,000 4,217,695,000 1.03 201610K,page65
HollyEnergyPartnersLP 723,750,000 690,912,000 1.05 201610K,page73
MagellanMidstreamPartnersLP 4,262,321,000 4,087,192,000 1.04 201610K,page114
NuStarEnergyLP 3,084,762,000 3,014,364,000 1.02 201610K,page85
PlainsAllAmericanPipeline 10,300,000,000 10,124,000,000 1.02 201610K,pageF27
Average 1.03
ApplicationofCapitalStructureasdeterminedintheCapitalizationRateStudy
CapitalStructure MarkettoBook Composite
CommonEquity 64.00% 3.42 2.19
LongtermDebt 36.00% 1.03 0.37
OverallMarkettoBookRatio 2.56
YieldRate
ClassIRailroads
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
LongTermDebt 21.00% 4.85% 1.02%
CommonEquity 79.00% 10.31% 8.14%
YieldRate 9.16%
ClassIRailroadsYieldRate 9.16%
OtherRailroads
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
LongTermDebt 31.00% 7.21% 2.24%
CommonEquity 69.00% 10.93% 7.54%
YieldRate 9.78%
OtherRailroadsYieldRate 9.78%
CapitalStructure
Valueof %Long
ValueofLong Valueof TotalMarket %Preferred %Common
Company Preferred Term
TermDebt CommonEquity Value Equity Equity
Equity Debt
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. 7,517,000,000 None 49,296,079,000 56,813,079,000 13.23% N/A 86.77%
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited 6,366,000,000 None 21,190,092,000 27,556,092,000 23.10% N/A 76.90%
CSXCorp. 9,888,000,000 None 32,323,533,000 42,211,533,000 23.42% N/A 76.58%
Genesee&Wyoming 1,977,600,000 None 4,439,969,271 6,417,569,271 30.82% N/A 69.18%
KansasCitySouthern 2,275,700,000 6,100,000 9,163,584,075 11,445,384,075 19.88% 0.05% 80.06%
NorfolkSouthernCorp. 9,555,000,000 None 30,531,318,936 40,086,318,936 23.84% N/A 76.16%
UnionPacificCorp. 15,205,000,000 None 81,677,783,136 96,882,783,136 15.69% N/A 84.31%
WeplacedmorerelianceonthemediancapitalstructurewhenselectingtheindicatedcapitalstructureforClassIRailroads,roundingto21%debt,79%equity.
WeselectedthemeancapitalstructureastheindicatedcapitalstructureforOtherRailroads,roundingto31%debt,69%equity.
Notes:
DatadownloadedfromValueLine.
* DoesnotincludeGenesee&Wyoming.
^Genesee&Wyomingonly.
IndicatedRateofDebt
LongTerm
Company DebtRating
DebtRate
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. A2 4.29
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited Baa1 4.85
CSXCorp. Baa1 4.85
Genesee&Wyoming Ba2 7.21 **
KansasCitySouthern (P)Baa3 4.85
NorfolkSouthernCorp. Baa1 4.85
UnionPacificCorp. A3 4.29
MeanClassI* 4.66
MedianClassI* 4.85
IndicatedRateofDebt,ClassIRailroads 4.85%
IndicatedRateofDebt,OtherRailroads^ 7.21%
WeselectedthemedianastheindicatedrateofdebtforClassIRailroads.
WeselectedGenesee&Wyoming'slongtermdebtrateastheindicatedrateofdebtforOtherRailroads.
IndustrialBondYieldAveragesfromMergentBondRecord,January2017Edition
IndustrialBondAverages,December2016
Notes:
*DoesnotincludeGenesee&Wyoming.
^Genesee&WyomingOnly.
**Genesee&WyomingisratedbelowtheMergentBondRecordBondYieldAverages.WeanalyzedtheMergentBond
Record,January2017issue,forU.S.CorporateBondsthatwereconsideredbelowinvestmentgrade.Wedeterminedthe
averageBayieldtomaturityis7.21%.
IndicatedRateofEquity
ClassIRailroads
Model Rate
CAPMExPost 10.63%
CAPMSupplySide 9.54%
CAPMExAnte 9.04%
CAPMDamodaran 9.22%
CAPMDuff&Phelps 9.72%
EmpiricalCAPMExPost 10.41%
EmpiricalCAPMSupplySide 9.34%
EmpiricalCAPMExAnte 8.86%
EmpiricalCAPMDamodaran 9.03%
EmpiricalCAPMDuff&Phelps 9.54%
DGMDividendGrowth 11.85%
DGMEarningsGrowth 10.30%
MulitStageDGM 9.01%
IndicatedRateofEquity 10.31%
OtherRailroads
Model Rate
CAPMExPost 12.51%
CAPMSupplySide 11.15%
CAPMExAnte 10.53%
CAPMDamodaran 10.76%
CAPMDuff&Phelps 11.20%
EmpiricalCAPMExPost 11.81%
EmpiricalCAPMSupplySide 10.55%
EmpiricalCAPMExAnte 9.98%
EmpiricalCAPMDamodaran 10.19%
EmpiricalCAPMDuff&Phelps 10.65%
DGMDividendGrowth 11.85%
DGMEarningsGrowth 10.30%
MulitStageDGM 9.01%
IndicatedRateofEquity 10.93%
Weestablishedarangeofacceptabilityforthecostofequitywithallavailablemodels.Weconsideredallofthedataandplaced
themostrelianceontheDividendGrowthModel,EarningsGrowth.ThedepartmentplacedsecondaryrelianceontheCapital
AssetPricingModelsusingDr.Damodaran'sandtheExPostequityriskpremiums.
DirectRateandGrowth
ClassIRailroads
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
DebtComponent 21.00% 4.85% 1.02%
EquityComponent 79.00% 5.52% 4.36%
DirectRate 5.38%
ClassIRailroadsDirectRate 5.38%
YieldRate 9.16%
DirectRate 5.38%
EstimatedIndustryGrowthRate 3.78%
OtherRailroads
Capital
Rate Composite
Structure
DebtComponent 31.00% 7.21% 2.24%
EquityComponent 69.00% 5.46% 3.77%
DirectRate 6.00%
OtherRailroadsDirectRate 6.00%
YieldRate 9.78%
DirectRate 6.00%
EstimatedIndustryGrowthRate 3.78%
CapitalAssetPricingModel(CAPM)
ClassIRailroads
CAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
4 5
Model Premium
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13
=IndustryRiskPremium 7.84% 6.75% 6.25% 6.43% 6.22%
1
+RiskFreeRate 2.79% 2.79% 2.79% 2.79% 3.50%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2017asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(and
shouldbeusedinconjunctionwith)a3.5%normalizedriskfreerate.2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
CapitalAssetPricingModel(CAPM)
OtherRailroads
CAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
4 5
Model Premium
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
=IndustryRiskPremium 9.72% 8.36% 7.74% 7.97% 7.70%
1
+RiskFreeRate 2.79% 2.79% 2.79% 2.79% 3.50%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2017asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(and
shouldbeusedinconjunctionwith)a3.5%normalizedriskfreerate.2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
EmpiricalCapitalAssetPricingModel(ECAPM)
ClassIRailroads
ECAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
Model4 Premium5
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13
x75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
=IndustryRiskPremium(weighted) 5.88% 5.06% 4.69% 4.82% 4.66%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2017asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(andshould
beusedinconjunctionwith)a3.5%normalizedriskfreerate.2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
EmpiricalCapitalAssetPricingModel(ECAPM)
OtherRailroads
ECAPMModel
ExAnte,3Stage Dr.Damodaran
2 3
ExPost SupplySide DividendGrowth EquityRisk Duff&Phelps6
Model4 Premium5
Equityriskpremium 6.94% 5.97% 5.53% 5.69% 5.50%
xIndustryBeta 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
x75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
=IndustryRiskPremium(weighted) 7.29% 6.27% 5.81% 5.97% 5.78%
Notes:
1 USTreasury20yearCouponBondYield,December30,2016
2 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(historical),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
3 Longhorizonexpectedequityriskpremium(supplyside),2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
4 3StageDividendGrowthModel,S&P500,SeeExhibit,ExAnteCalculation
5 ImpliedEquityRiskPremiumonJanuary1,2017asdeterminedbyDr.AswathDamodaran;http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/
6 Duff&Phelpsrecommendedequityriskpremium(conditional):TheDuff&PhelpsrecommendedERPwasdevelopedinrelationto(andshould
beusedinconjunctionwith)a3.5%normalizedriskfreerate.2017ValuationHandbookGuidetoCostofCapital
Proj Costof
CostofCapital
Current ProjEPS Dividend Capital
Dividend
Company Dividend GrowthRate Growth Earnings
GrowthDY
Yield(DY) 5Year(EG) Rate5Year Growth
+DG
(DG) DY+EG
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. 1.70% 9.50% 13.50% 11.20% 15.20%
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited 1.00% 12.50% 14.00% 13.50% 15.00%
CSXCorp. 2.10% 8.00% 9.50% 10.10% 11.60%
Genesee&Wyoming Nil 6.50% Nil
KansasCitySouthern 1.50% 9.00% 10.50% 10.50% 12.00%
NorfolkSouthernCorp. 2.30% 6.50% 4.00% 8.80% 6.30%
UnionPacificCorp. 2.20% 7.00% 9.50% 9.20% 11.70%
DGMDividendGrowth,IndicatedRate 11.85%
DGMEarningsGrowth,IndicatedRate 10.30%
Weplacedmostrelainceonthemedianwhenselectingtheindicatedrategiventhewiderangeinvalues.
Notes:
DividendYieldprovidedbyValueLine.
Genesee&Wyomingisshownintheabovecalculation,butisnotincludedinthemean,medianormodel
becausetheydonotpaydividends.
MultiStageDividendGrowthModel
KE=(D1/P0)+0.67(G1)+0.33(g)
Where:
KECostofEquity G1GrowthEstimate,nextfiveyears
D1/P0DividendYield gStableGrowth
G1Growth
D1/P0 gStable KECostof
Company Estimate,next 0.67xG1 .33xg
DividendYield Growth Equity
fiveyears
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. 1.70% 9.50% 4.60% 6.37% 1.52% 9.58%
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited 1.00% 12.50% 4.60% 8.38% 1.52% 10.89%
CSXCorp. 2.10% 8.00% 4.60% 5.36% 1.52% 8.98%
KansasCitySouthern 1.50% 9.00% 4.60% 6.03% 1.52% 9.05%
NorfolkSouthernCorp. 2.30% 6.50% 4.60% 4.36% 1.52% 8.17%
UnionPacificCorp. 2.20% 7.00% 4.60% 4.69% 1.52% 8.41%
Mean 9.18%
Median 9.01%
MultiStageDGM,IndicatedRate 9.01%
Weplacedthemostrelianceonthemediantoarriveattheindicatedrate.
Notes:
DividendYieldprovidedbyValueLine.
GrowthEstimates,Next5YearsforEarningsprovidedValueLine.
WeremovedGenesee&Wyomingbecausetheydonotpaydividends.
EquityComponentoftheDirectRate,ClassIRailroads
ValueLine
Company
P/ERatio
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. 18.50
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited 16.80
CSXCorp. 18.30
KansasCitySouthern 17.90
NorfolkSouthernCorp. 17.70
UnionPacificCorp. 19.50
Mean 18.12
Median 18.10
SelectedPricetoEarnings(P/E)Ratio 18.10
IndicatedEquityComponentoftheDirectRate 5.52%
EquityComponentoftheDirectRate,OtherRailroads
ValueLine
Company
P/ERatio
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. 18.50
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited 16.80
CSXCorp. 18.30
Genesee&Wyoming 21.30
KansasCitySouthern 17.90
NorfolkSouthernCorp. 17.70
UnionPacificCorp. 19.50
Mean 18.57
Median 18.30
SelectedPricetoEarnings(P/E)Ratio 18.30
IndicatedEquityComponentoftheDirectRate 5.46%
WeplacedthemostrelianceonthemedianpricetoearningsratioforboththeClassIandOtherRailroads.
Notes:
ThePrice/EarningsRatiowasdownloadedfromValueLine.
*TrailingP/ERatio
BetaAnalysis
Company Beta
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. 1.00
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited 1.20
CSXCorp. 1.20
Genesee&Wyoming 1.40
KansasCitySouthern 1.15
NorfolkSouthernCorp. 1.10
UnionPacificCorp. 1.05
ClassIRailroads*
BetaMean 1.12
BetaMedian 1.13
UnleveredandReleveredMean^ 1.13
IndicatedBeta 1.13
OtherRailroads^^
BetaMean 1.40
BetaMedian 1.40
IndicatedBeta 1.40
WeplacedequalrelianceonthemeanandmedianwhenselectingtheindicatedbetaforbothClassIandOtherRailroads.
Notes:
* DoesnotincludeGenesee&Wyoming.
^SeetheUnleveringReleveringBetapageforthecalculation.
WedidnotunleverandreleverthebetaforOtherRailroadsasitisonlyGenesee&Wyoming.
^^Genesee&Wyomingonly
Unlevering/ReleveringBetas
GuidelineCompaniesforClassIRailroads
ValueLine CapitalStructureTabofCapRate CapitalStructureTabofCapRate ValueLine Formula
ActualIncome ActualDebtinCapital ActualEquityinCapital LeveredBeta Unlevered
UnleveringofBetas
TaxRate Structure Structure (Published) Beta
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. 26.50% 13.23% 86.77% 1.00 0.90
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited 26.00% 23.10% 76.90% 1.20 0.98
CSXCorp. 37.00% 23.42% 76.58% 1.20 1.01
KansasCitySouthern 33.00% 19.88% 80.06% 1.15 0.99
NorfolkSouthernCorp. 38.00% 23.84% 76.16% 1.10 0.92
UnionPacificCorp. 37.50% 15.69% 84.31% 1.05 0.94
AverageBeta 1.12
DebtRatingAnalysis
Yieldto
Maturity S&P Coupon 52Week 52Week Sales Current
Company Ticker CUSIP Issue Callable Maturity
Date Industry % LowPrice HighPrice Price Yield
%
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. CNI 136375BD3 Nt 7/15/2028 Yes Railroads 6.9 3.34 132.85 132.85 133.39 5.17
PuttableReset
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. CNI 136375BE1 7/15/2018 No Railroads 6.71 N/A 134.35 134.35 134.99 4.97
SecsPurs
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. CNI 136375BA9 Nt 5/15/2023 Yes Railroads 6.8 1.69 107.53 107.53 106.99 6.35
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. CNI 136375AY8 Deb 7/15/2036 No Railroads 7.62 3.48 N/A 0 122.97 6.2
CSXCorp. CSX 126408GH0 Nt 10/1/2036 Yes Railroads 6 4.28 119.02 119.02 122.63 4.89
CSXCorp. CSX 126408GK3 FixedRtNt 5/1/2037 Yes Railroads 6.15 4.36 122.4 122.4 123.79 4.96
CSXCorp. CSX 126408GJ6 FixedRtNt 5/1/2017 Yes Railroads 5.6
CSXCorp. CSX 126408AQ6 Deb 9/15/2022 No Railroads 8.1 3.24 121.87 121.87 124.44 6.5
CSXCorp. CSX 126408AM5 Deb 5/15/2022 No Railroads 8.62 3.24 125.18 125.18 125.58 6.86
KansasCitySouthern KSU 485170AF1 FxdRtDeb 12/15/2025 Yes Railroads 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
NorfolkSouthernCorp. NSC 655844AV0 FixedRtSrNt 3/15/2105 Yes Railroads 6 5.06 115.17 115.17 118.31 5.07
NorfolkSouthernCorp. NSC 655844AK4 Nt 5/15/2097 Yes Railroads 7.9 5.43 143.02 143.02 144.79 5.45
NorfolkSouthernCorp. NSC 655844AX6 Nt 5/17/2029 Yes Railroads 5.64 3.92 114.42 114.42 116.52 4.84
NorfolkSouthernCorp. NSC 655844AW8 Nt 5/17/2025 Yes Railroads 5.59 3.48 114.06 114.06 114.95 4.86
NorfolkSouthernCorp. NSC 655844AF5 FixedRtNt 5/1/2037 Yes Railroads 7.05 4.45 135.04 135.04 134.37 5.24
NorfolkSouthernCorp. NSC 655844AQ1 FixedRtSrNt 2/15/2031 Yes Railroads 7.25 3.88 133.79 133.79 136.04 5.32
NorfolkSouthernCorp. NSC 655844AJ7 FixedRtNt 5/15/2027 Yes Railroads 7.8 3.7 133.52 133.52 134.57 5.79
NorfolkSouthernCorp. NSC 655844AE8 Nt 5/15/2017 Yes Railroads 7.7 1.33 102.3 102.3 101.35 7.59
NorfolkSouthernCorp. NSC 655844AA6 FixedRtNt 3/1/2021 No Railroads 9 3.51 0 120.34 7.47
UnionPacificCorp. UNP 907818CX4 FxdRtDeb 5/1/2037 Yes Railroads 6.15 4.23 123.25 123.25 125.76 4.89
UnionPacificCorp. UNP 907818CF3 Deb 2/1/2029 Yes Railroads 6.62 3.38 129.9 129.9 131.60 5.03
UnionPacificCorp. UNP 907818CW6 FxdRtNt 5/1/2017 Yes Railroads 5.65 1.48 101.53 101.53 100.72 5.6
UnionPacificCorp. UNP 907818CU0 SrNt 5/1/2034 Yes Railroads 6.25 4.03 125.76 125.76 127.31 4.9
UnionPacificCorp. UNP 907818BY3 Deb 2/1/2028 No Railroads 7.12 3.66 129.02 129.02 130.94 5.44
DatacompiledfromS&PCapitalIQMcGrawHillFinancialonMarch1,2017
CalculationofMarkettoBookRatiosforRailroadMarketSegment
December31,2016calendaryearinformationfortheJanuary2,2017Assessment Amarkettobookratiooveronewouldbeanindicationofnoobsolescence.
MarketValueestimatesforCommonEquityarefromValueLine.MarketValueEstimatesforLongTermDebtarefromthecompany'sAnnualReportor10K.
BookValueamountsarefromthecompany'sbalancesheetaslistedinthe10KorAnnualReport
MarkettoBookRatioforEquity
MarketValueof
BookValueof MarkettoBook
Company CommonEquity Source
CommonEquity Ratio
fromValueLine
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. 49,296,079,000 11,053,576,800 ^ 4.46 2016FullYearFinancialsReport,page55
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited 21,190,092,000 3,445,444,800 ^ 6.15 2016AnnualReport,page98
CSXCorp. 32,323,533,000 11,694,000,000 2.76 201610K,page23
Genesee&Wyoming 4,439,969,271 3,187,121,000 1.39 201610K,pageF3
KansasCitySouthern 9,163,584,075 4,089,900,000 2.24 201610K,page52
NorfolkSouthernCorp. 30,531,318,936 12,409,000,000 2.46 201610K,pageK39
UnionPacificCorp. 81,677,783,136 19,932,000,000 4.10 201610K,page49
ClassIAverage* 3.90
OtherRailroadsAverage** 1.39
MarkettoBookRatioforDebt
MarketValueof
BookValueLong MarkettoBook
Company LongTermDebt Source
TermDebt Ratio
from10K
CanadianNationalRailwayCo. 9,000,163,200 ^ 8,145,877,600 ^ 1.10 2016FullYearFinancialsReport,page55
CanadianPacificRailwayLimited 7,433,848,800 ^ 6,467,843,200 ^ 1.15 2016AnnualReport,page117
CSXCorp. 12,096,000,000 11,293,000,000 1.07 201610K,page104
Genesee&Wyoming 2,303,531,000 2,359,453,000 0.98 201610K,pageF42
KansasCitySouthern 2,303,800,000 2,296,900,000 1.00 201610K,page44
NorfolkSouthernCorp. 11,626,000,000 10,112,000,000 1.15 201610K,pageK39
UnionPacificCorp. 15,900,000,000 15,000,000,000 1.06 201610K,page72
ClassIAverage* 1.08
OtherRailroadsAverage** 0.98
ClassIRailroads
ApplicationofCapitalStructureasdeterminedintheCapitalizationRateStudy
OtherRailroads
ApplicationofCapitalStructureasdeterminedintheCapitalizationRateStudy
Notes:
CanadianDollarsconvertedtoU.S.Dollarsusing12/2016exchangerateof0.7448fromtheBankofCanada
Mean 7.84%
Median 7.84%
Assumptions:
Stages Years Growth Model 1 Model 2
1st Stage 1-5 years Constant @: 12.09% * 12.09% *
Linear
2nd Stage 6-15 years Linear from: 11.40% to 4.54% OR 11.40% to 3.17% from
Real Growth** Inflation^ 1st
3rd Stage 15 years -perpetuity GDP Growth: Real and Inflation 1.60% 2.80% + 1.57% to 1.74% Stage
to 3rd
Stage
GDP Growth^^: Real + Inflation 4.54% TO 3.17%
Model 1 Model 2
Impled Market Return 8.32% 7.37%
Model 1 Model 2
Year Starting Industry S & P 500 Starting Industry S & P 500
2016 Start Price $ (2,184.88) Start Price $ (2,184.88)
2017 Expected Dividends $ 49.09 Expected Dividends $ 49.09
2018 12.090% $ 55.02 1st Stage 12.090% $ 55.02
1st Stage
2019 12.090% $ 61.68 Growth 12.090% $ 61.68
Growth Rates
2020 12.090% $ 69.13 Rates 12.090% $ 69.13
2021 12.090% $ 77.49 12.090% $ 77.49
2022 11.40% $ 86.33 11.40% $ 86.33
2023 10.717% $ 95.58 10.580% $ 95.46
2024 10.031% $ 105.17 9.757% $ 104.78
2025 9.345% $ 115.00 8.934% $ 114.14
2nd Stage
2026 2nd Stage 8.658% $ 124.95 8.110% $ 123.40
Growth
2027 Growth Rates 7.972% $ 134.91 7.287% $ 132.39
Rates
2028 7.285% $ 144.74 6.463% $ 140.94
2029 6.599% $ 154.30 5.640% $ 148.89
2030 5.913% $ 163.42 4.817% $ 156.06
2031 5.226% $ 171.96 3.993% $ 162.30
2032 4.540% $ 179.77 3.170% $ 167.44
2033 4.540% $ 187.93 3.170% $ 172.75
2034 4.540% $ 196.46 3.170% $ 178.23
2035 4.540% $ 205.38 3.170% $ 183.88
2036 4.540% $ 214.70 3.170% $ 189.70
2037 4.540% $ 224.45 3.170% $ 195.72
2038 4.540% $ 234.64 3.170% $ 201.92
2039 4.540% $ 245.29 3.170% $ 208.32
2040 4.540% $ 256.43 3.170% $ 214.93
2041 4.540% $ 268.07 3.170% $ 221.74
2042 4.540% $ 280.24 3.170% $ 228.77
2043 4.540% $ 292.97 3.170% $ 236.02
2044 4.540% $ 306.27 3.170% $ 243.50
2045 4.540% $ 320.17 3.170% $ 251.22
2046 4.540% $ 334.71 3.170% $ 259.19
2047 4.540% $ 349.90 3.170% $ 267.40
2048 4.540% $ 365.79 3.170% $ 275.88
2049 4.540% $ 382.39 3.170% $ 284.62
2050 4.540% $ 399.76 3.170% $ 293.65
2051 4.540% $ 417.90 3.170% $ 302.96
2052 4.540% $ 436.88 3.170% $ 312.56
2053 4.540% $ 456.71 3.170% $ 322.47
2054 4.540% $ 477.45 3.170% $ 332.69
2055 4.540% $ 499.12 3.170% $ 343.24
2056 4.540% $ 521.78 3.170% $ 354.12
2057 4.540% $ 545.47 3.170% $ 365.34
2058 4.540% $ 570.24 3.170% $ 376.92
2059 4.540% $ 596.12 3.170% $ 388.87
2060 4.540% $ 623.19 3.170% $ 401.20
2061 4.540% $ 651.48 3.170% $ 413.92
2062 4.540% $ 681.06 3.170% $ 427.04
2063 4.540% $ 711.98 3.170% $ 440.57
2064 4.540% $ 744.30 3.170% $ 454.54
2065 4.540% $ 778.09 3.170% $ 468.95
2066 4.540% $ 813.42 3.170% $ 483.82
2067 4.540% $ 850.35 3.170% $ 499.15
AppendixGGuidelineCompanies
GuidelineCompanyAddendumContents
TableofContents
Market Segment: Electric ....................................................................................................................................... 1
Companies Included in the Electric Market Segment ......................................................................................... 1
Companies Not Included in the Electric Market Segment ................................................................................ 10
Market Segment: Gas Distribution ....................................................................................................................... 29
Companies Included in the Gas Distribution Market Segment ......................................................................... 29
Companies Not Included in the Gas Distribution Market Segments ................................................................ 35
Market Segment: Gas Transmission Pipeline and Fluid Transportation Pipeline ................................................ 39
Companies Included in the Gas Transmission Pipeline Market Segment ........................................................ 39
Companies Included in the Fluid Transportation Pipeline Market Segment .................................................... 42
Companies Not Included in the Gas Transmission Pipeline or Fluid Transportation Market Segments.......... 46
Market Segment: Railroad, Class I and Other Railroads ...................................................................................... 87
Companies Included in the Railroad Market Segment...................................................................................... 87
Companies Not Included in the Railroad Market Segment............................................................................... 90
Note: The information below is verbatim from Value Line and the companys website.
MarketSegment:Electric
CompaniesIncludedintheElectricMarketSegment
ALLETE, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
ALLETE, Inc. is the parent of Minnesota Power, which supplies electricity to 146,000 customers in northeastern
MN, & Superior Water, Light & Power in northwestern WI. Electric rev. breakdown: taconite
mining/processing, 26%; paper/wood products, 9%; other industrial, 8%; residential, 12%; commercial, 13%;
wholesale, 16% other, 16%. ALLETE Clean Energy owns renewable energy projects. Acqd U.S. Water
Services 2/15. Has real estate operation in FL. Generating sources: coal & lignite, 51%; wind, 11%; other, 3%;
purchased, 35%. Fuel costs: 22% of revs. 15 deprec. rate: 3.3%. Has 1,600 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
ALLETE's Minnesota Power electric utility serves 144,000 residents, 16 municipalities and some of the nation's
largest industrial customers. Other businesses include BNI Energy, delivers energy solutions in North Dakota;
ALLETE Clean Energy, a developer and operator of energy projects throughout the US with limited
environmental impact; Superior Water, Light & Power, serves electric, water and gas to residents in Superior,
Wisconsin; ALLETE Renewable Resources, which operates and maintains wind generation facilities in North
Page | G 1 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Dakota; and U.S. Water Services, an integrated industrial water management company serving customers in
USA and Canada.1
Why was the company included?
This company is similar (and is one of) to the Electric Companies that the State Assessed Section is responsible
for valuing. The company engages in providing energy in the upper Midwest.
Alliant Energy Corp.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Alliant Energy Corp., formerly named Interstate Energy, is a holding company formed through the merger of
WPL Holdings, IES Industries, and Interstate Power. Supplies electricity, gas, and other services in Wisconsin,
Iowa, and Minnesota. Elect. revs. by state: WI, 44%; IA, 55%; MN, 1%. Elect. rev.: residential, 39%;
commercial, 24%; industrial, 30%; wholesale, 6%; other, 1%. Fuel sources, 2015: coal, 46%; gas, 19%; other,
35%. Fuel costs: 49% of revs. 2015 depreciation rate: 5.7%. Estimated plant age: 13 years. Has 4,070
employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We serve approximately 950,000 electric customers and 410,000 natural gas customers. We have approximately
4,000 employees. We are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker LNT.2
Why was the company included?
This company is similar (and is one of) to the Electric Companies that the State Assessed Section is responsible
for valuing. The company engages in providing energy in the upper Midwest.
Ameren Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Ameren Corporation is a holding company formed through the merger of Union Electric and CIPSCO. Acqd
CILCORP 1/03; Illinois Power 10/04. Has 1.2 mill. electric and 127,000 gas customers in Missouri; 1.2 mill.
electric and 813,000 gas customers in Illinois. Discontinued nonregulated power-generation operation in 13.
Electric rev. breakdown: residential, 45%; commercial, 33%; industrial, 12%; other, 10%. Generating sources:
coal, 67%; nuclear, 23%; hydro, 4%; purchased & other, 6%. Fuel costs: 30% of revs. 15 reported deprec. rates:
3%-4%. Has 8,500 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Ameren Corporation is a Fortune 500 company that trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
AEE. It is the parent company of Ameren Illinois, based in Collinsville, Ill., and Ameren Missouri in St. Louis.
Ameren Transmission Company, also based in St. Louis, designs and builds regional transmission projects.
Ameren was created by the combination of three Illinois utilities (CIPSCO Incorporated, CILCO Inc. and Illinois
Power Company) and Union Electric Company of St. Louis. The name comes from combining the words
American and Energy. Employing more than 8,500 personnel, Ameren powers the quality of life for 2.4 million
electric customers and more than 900,000 natural gas customers across a 64,000-square-mile area.
Ameren Missouri ranks as the largest electric power provider in Missouri, and Ameren Illinois ranks
as Illinois' third largest natural gas distribution operation in total number of customers. Ameren companies
generate a net capacity of nearly 10,200 megawatts of electricity and own more than 7,500 circuit miles of
transmission lines. Ameren's rates are some of the lowest in the nation.3
Page | G - 2 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Page | G - 3 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Page | G - 4 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
9 https://www.newlook.dteenergy.com/wps/wcm/connect/dte-web/home/about-dte/common/about-dte/about-dte, accessed
12/21/2016
10 http://entergy.com/about_entergy/, accessed 12/21/2016
Page | G - 5 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Page | G - 6 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
regulated natural gas utility business in Montana includes production, storage transmission and
distribution. Since 2010, we have acquired gas production and gathering system assets as part of an overall
strategy to provide rate stability and customer value through the addition of regulated assets that are not subject
to market forces. We provide natural gas to 60 South Dakota communities and also transport natural gas for eight
gas-marketing firms and three large end-user accounts. In Nebraska we provide natural gas service to four
communities and transport natural gas for three gas-marketing firms and one end-user account.12
Why was the company included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (West) Value Line Industry and operates in Montana, Wyoming,
South Dakota, and Nebraska with generating facilities in North Dakota and Iowa. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies that are
located in or directly next to Minnesota. 15% of their gross margin is derived from South Dakota.
OGE Energy Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
OGE Energy Corp. is a holding company for Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company (OG&E), which supplies
electricity to 830,000 customers in Oklahoma (84% of electric revenues) and western Arkansas (8%); wholesale
is (8%). Owns 26.3% of Enable Midstream Partners. Electric revenue breakdown: residential, 41%; commercial,
24%; industrial, 16%; other, 19%. Generating sources: coal, 34%; gas, 30%; wind, 5%; purchased, 31%. Fuel
costs: 39% of revenues. 15 reported depreciation rate (utility): 2.9%. Has 2,600 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
OGE Energy Corp. (NYSE: OGE), is headquartered in Oklahoma City and is the parent company of Oklahoma
Gas and Electric Company (OG&E), a regulated electric utility serving more than 800,000 customers in
Oklahoma and western Arkansas. In addition, OGE holds 26.3 percent limited partner interest and 50 percent
general partner interest in Enable Midstream Partners, LP. OG&E serves more than 800,000 retail customers in
Oklahoma and western Arkansas, and a number of wholesale customers throughout the region. OG&E, with
about 6,800 megawatts of capacity, generates electricity from natural gas, western coal, and wind. OG&E's
electric transmission and distribution systems span 30,000 square miles.13
Page | G - 7 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
value by building strong electric utility and manufacturing platforms. For our shareholders we deliver above
average returns through operational excellence and growing our businesses. For our customers we commit to
quality and value in everything we do. For our employees we provide an environment of opportunity with
accountability where people are valued and empowered to do their best work.14
Page | G - 8 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
commercial & industrial, 31%; large commercial & industrial, 21%; other, 13%. Generating sources: coal, 52%;
gas, 16%; renewables, 3%; purchased, 29%. Fuel costs: 38% of revs. 15 reported deprec. rates (utility): 1.2%-
3.0%. Has 8,400 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are one of the nations largest electric and natural gas delivery companies, with deep operational expertise,
scale and financial resources to meet the regions future energy needs. We focus on reliable service, customer
satisfaction and shareholder value. Were privileged to provide vital services to nearly 4.4 million customers in
Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan and Minnesota. Our scale and geographic proximity allow for operating
efficiencies across our 70,000 miles of electric distribution lines, 44,000 miles of natural gas distribution and
transmission lines, and 8,800 megawatts of reliable power plant capacity. Were committed to delivering world-
class reliability and the very best customer care anywhere. Our customers are at the heart of our business, and
we work every day to help grow and support the communities we serve. As a Fortune 500 company, we value
and develop our employees who are making a difference in a mission that matters.16
MILWAUKEE, June 29, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Wisconsin Energy Corporation announced today it has
completed the acquisition of Integrys Energy forming the WEC Energy Group (NYSE: WEC). 17
Page | G - 9 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Xcel Energy Inc.s operations include the activity of four wholly owned utility subsidiaries that serve electric
and natural gas customers in our eight states. These utility subsidiaries, referred to as operating companies, are
Northern States Power Company-Minnesota, Northern States Power Company-Wisconsin, Public Service
Company of Colorado and Southwestern Public Service Company. 18
CompaniesNotIncludedintheElectricMarketSegment
AES Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
AES Corp. has four LOB: contract generation, competitive supply, large utilities, and growth distribution. Contr.
gener. consists of multiple gener. facilities engaging in long-term contracts. The competitive supply unit consists
of gener. facil. that sell electricity in the spot market. The util. line is comprised of regulated electric comp. The
growth distrb. unit incl. utilities located in emerging economies. Lat. Amer. ops., 50% of 2015 revenues; North
Amer., 21%; MCAC, 17%; EMEA, 9%; Asia, 3%. Employs about 21,800. T. Rowe Price owns 16.0% of shs.;
BlackRock, 9.9%; Vanguard, 9.2%; Boston Partners, 6.3%, State St., 5.1% (3/16 proxy).
We are dedicated to improving the lives of our customers by leveraging our energy solutions that encompass a
broad range of technologies and fuel types, including coal, diesel, gas, oil, pet coke and renewables. Our people
share a passion to help meet the worlds current and increasing energy needs, while providing communities and
countries the opportunity for economic growth due to the availability of reliable, affordable electric power.19
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Power Company Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline companies
for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies that are located in or
directly next to Minnesota.
Page | G - 10 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Avangrid, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
AVANGRID, Inc., formerly Iberdrola USA, Inc., is a diversified energy and utility company with more than $30
billion in assets and operations in 25 states. It operates regulated utilities and electricity generation through two
primary lines of business: Avangrid Networks and Avangrid Renewables. The former group includes eight
electric and natural gas utilities, serving customers in New York and New England. The latter operates 6.3
gigawatts of electricity capacity, primarily through wind power, in the U.S. Fuel costs: 22% of 15 rev. Has 2.2
million elect., 1 million gas customers. Has 6,810 employees.
AVANGRID, Inc. (NYSE: AGR) is a U.S. based diversified energy and utility company with $30 billion in
assets and operations in 25 states, created through the merger of Iberdrola USA and UIL Holdings Corp. in
December 2015.21
Avista Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Avista Corporation (formerly The Washington Water Power Company) supplies electricity & gas in eastern
Washington & northern Idaho. Supplies electricity to part of Alaska & gas to part of Oregon. Customers:
392,000 electric, 335,000 gas. Acqd Alaska Electric Light and Power 7/14. Sold Ecova energy-management
sub. 6/14. Electric rev. breakdown: residential, 34%; commercial, 31%; industrial, 11%; wholesale, 13%; other,
11%. Generating sources: gas & coal, 32%; hydro, 28%; purchased, 40%. Fuel costs: 44% of revs. 15 reported
deprec. rate (Avista): 3.1%. Has 1,900 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are an energy company involved in the production, transmission and distribution of energy as well as other
energy-related businesses. Avista Utilities is our operating division that provides electric service to more than
600,000 electric and natural gas customers. Our service territory covers 30,000 square miles in eastern
Washington, northern Idaho and parts of southern and eastern Oregon, with a population of 1.5 million. Alaska
Energy and Resources Company, an Avista subsidiary, provides retail electric service in the city and borough of
Juneau through its subsidiary Alaska Electric Light and Power Company. Our stock is traded under the ticker
Page | G - 11 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
symbol "AVA." Avistas legacy of innovation is rooted in the renewable energy weve generated since our
founding in 1889.22
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (West) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies that are
located in or directly next to Minnesota.
Cleco Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Not Available
Additional Company Information from Website:
Cleco is a regulated utility company headquartered in Pineville, Louisiana. In business since 1935, the company
has approximately 1,200 employees serving approximately 287,000 customers in Louisiana through its retail
business and supplies wholesale power in Louisiana and Mississippi. We offer reasonable rates, reliable service
and a customer-focused workforce. Cleco owns nine generating units with a total nameplate capacity of 3,310
megawatts, 11,931 miles of distribution lines and 1,305 miles of transmission lines. We use multiple generating
sources and multiple fuels to serve our customers. In addition to power generated by Cleco units, we have access
to purchased power when it's needed and when it's more cost effective than our generation.23
The sale of Pineville-based Cleco Corp. to an investor group is complete, the company announced April 13,
2016 article.24
Page | G - 12 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
electricity industry that are less comprehensively regulated than our regulated businesses. These segments
include the operation of electric generation facilities, trading of electricity and fuel, sales of electricity to
wholesale and retail customers, and sales of certain energy-related goods and services. Con Edison Transmission
offers customers diverse, low-cost energy supplies by investing in electric and gas transmission projects. Con
Edison Solutions is a retail energy supply and services company that sells electricity directly to delivery-service
customers of utilities primarily in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions. Con Edison Development participates
in infrastructure projects, developing and operating a grid of connected renewable energy infrastructure
throughout the continental United States. Con Edison Energy is a wholesale energy supply company that
procures electric energy, fuel, and capacity for Con Edison Solutions.
We operate one of the worlds largest energy delivery systems. Founded in 1823 as the New York Gas Light
company, our electric, gas, and steam service now provides energy for the 10 million people who live in New
York City and Westchester County. Were constantly looking toward the future and exploring ways to innovate
and take advantage of developing technology. But, more than anything, were listening to you and working hard
to give you cleaner, more efficient energy choices, and more control over when and how you use your power.
Con Edison of New York serves 3.3 million customers averaging a population of approximately nine million
people throughout a 604-square-mile service territory. Con Edison operates one of the most complex electric
power systems in the world. It is also the world's most reliable. Con Edison distributes natural gas to 1.1 million
customers in Manhattan, the Bronx, Queens, and Westchester County, making it one of the largest gas
distribution companies in the United States. Con Edison operates the largest district-energy steam system in the
United States. The steam system provides service to approximately 1,700 customers in Manhattan, from the
Battery to 96th Street on the West Side and 89th Street on the East Side.25
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (East) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies that are
located in or directly next to Minnesota.
Dominion Resources, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Dominion Resources, Inc. is a holding company for Virginia Power & North Carolina Power, which serve 2.6
mill. customers in Virginia & northeastern North Carolina. Serves 2.3 mill. gas customers in Ohio, West
Virginia, & Utah. Nonutility ops. incl. independent power production. Owns 70.9% of Dominion Midstream
Partners. Acqd Questar 9/16. Elec. rev. breakdown: residential, 46%; commercial, 32%; industrial, 7%; other,
15%. Generating sources: nuclear, 30%; coal, 26%; gas, 23%; other, 6%; purch. 15%. Fuel costs: 31% of revs.
15 reported depr. rates: 2.3%-3.7%. Has 14,700 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Dominion is one of the nation's largest producers and transporters of energy, with a portfolio of approximately
26,000 megawatts of generation, 14,400 miles of natural gas transmission, gathering and storage pipeline, and
6,500 miles of electric transmission lines. Dominion operates one of the nation's largest natural gas storage
systems with 1 trillion cubic feet of storage capacity and serves more than 6 million utility and retail energy
customers. Our company is built on a proud legacy of public service, innovation and community involvement. In
addition to our core energy production, transportation and storage businesses, we invest in communities where
we live and work and by practicing responsible environmental stewardship wherever we operate.26
Page | G - 13 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Page | G - 14 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
service in the region for more than 125 years. SCE maintains grid assets valued at more than $20 billion,
including 1.4 million power poles, 700,000 transformers and 103,000 miles of distribution and transmission
lines. In the past 5 years, SCEs energy efficiency programs have helped customers save enough energy to power
1.2 million homes for a year. SCE delivered more than 18 billion kilowatt-hours of renewable power to
customers in 2015. Thats nearly 24% of all the electricity we delivered that year.30
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (West) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies that are
located in or directly next to Minnesota.
El Paso Electric Company
Company Summary from Value Line:
El Paso Electric Company (EPE) provides electric service to 405,000 customers in an area of approximately
10,000 square miles in the Rio Grande valley in western Texas (68% of revenues) and southern New Mexico
(19% of revenues), including El Paso, Texas and Las Cruces, New Mexico. Wholesale is 13% of revenues.
Electric revenue breakdown by customer class not available. Generating sources: nuclear, 47%; gas, 34%; coal,
6%; purchased, 13%. Fuel costs: 28% of revenues. 15 reported depreciation rate: 2.6%. Has about 1,000
employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
El Paso Electric is a regional electric utility providing generation, transmission and distribution service to
approximately 400,000 retail and wholesale customers in a 10,000 square mile area of the Rio Grande valley in
west Texas and southern New Mexico. Its service territory extends from Hatch, New Mexico to Van Horn,
Texas and includes two connections to Juarez, Mexico and the Comisin Federal de Electricidad (CFE),
Mexicos national utility. EPEs principal industrial and large customers include steel production, copper and oil
refining, and United States military installations including the United States Army at Fort Bliss in Texas and the
White Sands Missile Range and Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico. EPE has a net dependable generating
capability of 1,990 MW. Its facilities include a 15.8 percent interest in the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating
Station in Wintersburg, Arizona, the Rio Grande Power Station in Sunland Park, New Mexico, the Newman
Power Station, Copper Power Station and Montana Power Staton in El Paso.31
Page | G - 15 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Page | G - 16 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
sources: nuclear, 68%; other, 8%; purch., 24%. Fuel costs: 44% of revs. 15 depr. rates: 2.8%-3.5% elec., 2.2%
gas. Has 34,000 empls.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are a FORTUNE 100 company that works in every stage of the energy business: power generation,
competitive energy sales, transmission and delivery. As the nation's leading competitive energy provider, Exelon
does business in 48 states, D.C., and Canada and had 2015 revenues of $34.5 billion. We employ approximately
34,000 people nationwide.35
Exelon Corporation (NYSE: EXC) and Pepco Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: POM) announced on March 23 that the
two companies had completed their merger transaction. The announcement followed the approval of the merger
by the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (DC PSC). The merger brought together Exelons
three electric and gas utilities BGE, ComEd and PECO and Pepco Holdings three electric and gas utilities
Atlantic City Electric, Delmarva Power and Pepco to create the leading mid-Atlantic electric and gas
utility company.36
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (East) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies that are
located in or directly next to Minnesota. Also, this company recently underwent an acquisition.
FirstEnergy Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
FirstEnergy Corp. is a holding company for Ohio Edison, Pennsylvania Power, Cleveland Electric, Toledo
Edison, Metropolitan Edison, Penelec, Jersey Central Power & Light, West Penn Power, Potomac Edison, &
Mon Power. Provides electric service to over 6 million customers in OH, PA, NJ, WV, MD, & NY. Acqd
Allegheny Energy 2/11. Electric revenue breakdown by customer class not available. Generating sources: coal,
44%; nuclear, 26%; purchased, 30%. Fuel costs: 43% of revenues. 13 reported deprec. rate: 2.6%. Has 15,800
employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are a forward-thinking electric utility powered by a diverse team of employees committed to making
customers lives brighter, the environment better and our communities stronger. FirstEnergy (NYSE: FE) is
dedicated to safety, reliability and operational excellence. Headquartered in Akron, Ohio, FirstEnergy includes
one of the nation's largest investor-owned electric systems, more than 24,000 miles of transmission lines that
connect the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions, and a diverse generating fleet with a total capacity of nearly
17,000 megawatts. Our company has invested $10 billion in environmental efforts since 1970, and we have a
continuing commitment to cleaner energy resources, smarter technology and a more sustainable planet.37
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (East) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies that are
located in or directly next to Minnesota.
Page | G - 17 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Fortis, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Fortis Inc. owns a diverse collection of businesses. Its main focus is electricity and gas utility operations (both
regulated and non-regulated) in the United States, Canada, and the Caribbean. It serves more than three million
electricity and gas customers. Owns UNS Energy (Arizona), Central Hudson (New York), FortisBC Energy
(British Columbia), FortisAlberta (Central Alberta), and Eastern Canada (Newfoundland). Fortis also operates 23
hotels, comprised of 4,400 rooms, in eight Canadian provinces.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Fortis Inc. has its origin in the formation of St. Johns Electric Light Company in 1885 in the province now
known as Newfoundland and Labrador. That company eventually became Newfoundland Light & Power Co.
Limited which became the first wholly owned subsidiary of Fortis Inc. Fortis was created as a holding company
in 1987 with the mission to expand and diversify. Today, Fortis is a leader in the North American utility industry
with assets of approximately $47 billion and 2015 revenue of $6.7 billion. Our 8,000 employees serve utility
customers in five Canadian provinces, nine U.S. states and three Caribbean countries.38
Why was the company not included?
This company is similar to the Electric Companies that the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
This company is in the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry. Fortis completed an acquisition of ITC
Holdings Corp in October 2016.39 Fortis Inc. began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on October 14,
2016. The company also trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange.40 Due to the recent acquisition we will not use
this company. We will review this company for use as a guideline company in the future.
Great Plains Energy
Company Summary from Value Line:
Great Plains Energy Incorporated is a holding company for Kansas City Power & Light and two other
subsidiaries, which supply electricity to 853,000 customers in western Missouri (71% of revenues) and eastern
Kansas (29%). Acquired Aquila 7/08. Sold Strategic Energy (energy-marketing subsidiary) in 08. Electric
revenue breakdown: residential, 40%; commercial, 39%; industrial, 9%; other, 12%. Generating sources: coal,
63%; nuclear, 13%; wind, 1%; gas & oil, 1%; purchased, 22%. Fuel costs: 24% of revenues. 15 reported deprec.
rate (utility): 3.0%. Has 2,900 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Great Plains Energy Incorporated (NYSE: GXP) is the holding company of Kansas City Power & Light
Company and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company (GMO). The utilities operate under the brand
name KCP&L. Our vertically integrated electric utilities serve just over 851,200 customers in 47 counties in
Missouri and Kansas with a combined diverse generation platform of more than 6,400 MW of capacity.41
Page | G - 18 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
acquisition of Westar Energy on September 26, 2016.42 After the acquisition, we will review the company again
to see if we should include the company as a guideline company.
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. is the parent company of Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. (HECO) &
American Savings Bank (ASB). HECO & its subs., Maui Electric Co. (MECO) & Hawaii Electric Light Co.
(HELCO), supply electricity to 458,000 customers on Oahu, Maui, Molokai, Lanai, & Hawaii. Operating
companies systems are not interconnected. Disc. intl power sub. in 01. Elec. rev. breakdown: resl, 31%;
comml, 34%; large light & power, 34%; other, 1%. Generating sources: oil, 54%; purchased, 46%. Fuel costs:
48% of revs. 15 reported depr. rate (util.): 3.2%. Has 3,900 empls.
Additional Company Information from Website:
At Hawaiian Electric Industries (HEI), through our subsidiaries, Hawaiian Electric Company and American
Savings Bank, we strive to be trusted and valued leaders in improving the economic well-being of the state,
promoting the environmental sustainability of our islands, and benefiting the communities we serve. At the
Hawaiian Electric Companies, we're committed to achieving a 100 percent renewable energy future for Hawaii.
As we continue to add diverse types of local renewable energy, Hawaii will reduce its dependence on imported
oil. Our vision is to empower our customers and communities with affordable, reliable, clean energy, and
provide innovative energy leadership for Hawaii. At American Savings Bank, we are the bank where everybody
is somebody a place where teammates work together to make banking easy while providing the best customer
experience. For more than 90 years we have championed the dreams of generations of island residents and
businesses. Our strength comes from helping customers succeed and supporting the communities they live in.
HEI works proactively to improve the future of Hawaii and its communities. These efforts are integrated into our
core business strategies. By helping our state achieve economic prosperity and a clean environment, and by
addressing our communities' needs, we build a sustainable future for our companies and for Hawaii.43
42 http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160926006171/en/Great-Plains-Energy-Westar-Energy-Shareholders-
Approve, accessed 12/21/2016
43 http://www.hei.com/CustomPage/Index?keyGenPage=1073751872, accessed 12/21/2016
Page | G - 19 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Power shareholders, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the public utility commissions of Idaho,
Oregon, Nevada and Wyoming (states where IDACORP has conducted business or has holdings). Under the
holding company structure, Idaho Power Company is the primary subsidiary. This regulated utility, created in
1916, is dedicated to providing quality electric service to more than 530,000 general business customers in a
24,000-square-mile service area in southern Idaho and eastern Oregon. The backbone of the companys
generation portfolio is a series of 17 hydroelectric plants it owns and operates on the Snake River and its
tributaries. Idaho Power also owns three natural gas-fired power plants and a partial interest in three coal-fired
generating stations. IDACORP's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading
symbol "IDA".44
Page | G - 20 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
stores to bring them to life. It is the transportation network of roads, highways and airports that keeps our
economy moving. Infrastructure is our business. We provide value-added natural resource products and related
services that are essential to energy and transportation infrastructure. Our company was founded in 1924 as a
small electric utility serving a handful of farm communities on the border of Montana and North Dakota. We
realized early the value of delivering a variety of services, and we grew our company by developing a core line
of businesses. Today, we are a multibillion-dollar corporation with most of our businesses headquartered in
Bismarck, North Dakota, but operations and customers across the country. MDU Resources is the largest
publicly traded company headquartered in North Dakota, and we do business in 48 states. Since 1948, our stock
has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange. It trades under the symbol MDU.47
Page | G - 21 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Page | G - 22 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Exelon Corporation (NYSE: EXC) and Pepco Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: POM) announced on March 23 that the
two companies had completed their merger transaction. The announcement followed the approval of the merger
by the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (DC PSC). The merger brought together Exelons
three electric and gas utilities BGE, ComEd and PECO and Pepco Holdings three electric and gas utilities
Atlantic City Electric, Delmarva Power and Pepco to create the leading mid-Atlantic electric and gas
utility company.53
Why was the company not included?
This company was acquired by Exelon Corporation and is no longer publically traded.
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation is a holding company for Arizona Public Service Company (APS), which
supplies electricity to 1.1 million customers in most of Arizona, except about half of the Phoenix metro area, the
Tucson metro area, and Mohave County in northwestern Arizona. Discontinued SunCor real estate subsidiary in
10. Electric revenue breakdown: residential, 49%; commercial, 39%; industrial, 5%; other, 7%. Generating
sources: coal, 31%; nuclear, 27%; gas & other, 20%; purchased, 22%. Fuel costs: 32% of revenues. 15 reported
deprec. rate: 2.7%. Has 6,400 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (NYSE: PNW) is an investor owned electric utility holding company based in
Phoenix, Arizona with consolidated assets of about $15 billion. For over 125 years, Pinnacle West and our
affiliates have provided energy and energy-related products to people and businesses throughout Arizona -- our
history and Arizonas history are bound together. Pinnacle West derives essentially all of our revenues and
earnings from our wholly-owned subsidiary, Arizona Public Service (APS). APS is a vertically-integrated
electric utility that provides either retail or wholesale electric service to most of the State of Arizona, 1.2 million
52 http://www.pepcoholdings.com/about-us/, accessed12/22/2016
53 http://www.pepcoholdings.com/about-us/exelon-acquisition/, accessed 12/22/2016
Page | G - 23 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
customers in total. APS is also the operator and co-owner of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station a
primary source of electricity for the Southwest. Pinnacle Wests other principal subsidiary is Bright Canyon
Energy.54
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (West) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies that are
located in or directly next to Minnesota.
PNM Resources, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
PNM Resources is a holding company with two regulated electric utilities. Its Public Service of New Mexico
unit (PNM) provides power generation, transmission, and distribution services across north central New Mexico,
including the cities of Albuquerque and Santa Fe. Texas-New Mexico Power Company (TNMP) transmits and
distributes power throughout New Mexico. Electric rev. breakdown 15: residential, 30%; commercial, 32%;
industrial, 19%; other, 19%. Fuels: coal, 57%; nuclear, 30%; gas/oil, 12%; solar, 1%. Fuel costs: 49% of
revenues. 15 depreciation rate: 3.3%. Has 1,881 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
PNM Resources Inc. is an energy holding company based in Albuquerque, New Mexico. It serves electricity to
more than 761,000 homes and businesses in New Mexico and Texas through its regulated utilities, PNM and
TNMP. In 2015 consolidated operating revenues totaled $1.4 billion. The companys generation capacity of
more than 2,787 megawatts reflects a balanced mix of coal, natural gas, nuclear, wind, solar and geothermal
generation. PNM Resources common stock trades on the NYSE under the ticker PNM.55
Page | G - 24 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Page | G - 25 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
and Northeast regions and has solar energy facilities throughout the United States. Another member of the PSEG
family of companies, PSEG Long Island, operates the electric transmission and distribution system of the Long
Island Power Authority, with 1.1 million customers. PSEG has approximately 13,000 employees, who are
carrying forward a proud tradition of dedicated service over more than 100 years.58
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in the Electric Utility (East) Value Line Industry. We are limiting the guideline
companies for electric to the Electric Utility (Central) Value Line Industry as well as those companies that are
located in or directly next to Minnesota.
SCANA Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
SCANA Corporation is a holding company for South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, which supplies
electricity to 707,000 customers in central, southern, and southwestern South Carolina. Supplies gas service to
1.3 million customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Electric revenue breakdown: residential,
44%; commercial, 33%; industrial, 18%; other, 5%. Generating sources: coal, 48%; oil & gas, 28%; nuclear,
19%; hydro, 3%; purchased, 2%. Fuel costs: 46% of revenues. 15 reported depreciation rate: 2.6%. Has 5,800
employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Headquartered in Cayce, South Carolina, SCANA is an energy-based holding company that has brought power
and fuel to homes in the Carolinas and Georgia for 160 years. SCANA is principally engaged, through
subsidiaries, in regulated electric and natural gas utility operations and other non-regulated energy-related
businesses in South Carolina, North Carolina and Georgia. In 1846, local business leaders met to form the
Charleston Gas Light Company. Two years later, the company lit the streets of Charleston with gas streetlights.
SCANA Corporation, a diversified holding company, was formed on December 31, 1984. Over half a million
electric customers in 25 counties throughout South Carolina. More than 1.2 million customers in South Carolina,
North Carolina and Georgia. Nearly 6,000 full and part-time employees.59
Page | G - 26 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Sempra Energy was created in 1998 by a merger of parent companies of two long-established, and highly
respected, investor-owned utilities -- Los Angeles-based Pacific Enterprises, the parent company of Southern
California Gas Co., and Enova Corporation, the parent company of San Diego Gas & Electric -- with rich
histories dating back more than a century. Sempra Energy capitalizes on new opportunities in competitive energy
markets. The companys ongoing focus is to enhance shareholder value and meet customer needs by sustaining
the financial strength, operational flexibility and skilled workforce needed to succeed in rapidly changing market
conditions. In 2015, Sempra Energy produced revenues of approximately $10 billion. Over the past 10 years,
Sempra Energy has delivered a total shareholder return of 181 percent, compared with total returns of 104
percent for the S&P 500 Utilities Index and 102 percent for the S&P 500 Index. During the past five years,
Sempra Energys total shareholder return was 110 percent. For multi-year periods, Sempra Energy is among the
top performers in its industry. Sempra Energys California utilities, San Diego Gas & Electric and SoCalGas,
serve more than 20 million consumers. And its other businesses Sempra U.S. Gas & Power and Sempra
International develop and operate critical energy infrastructure and provide gas and electricity services in
North America and South America.60
Page | G - 27 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
Foundation for its leadership and commitment to nuclear development and is continually ranked among the top
utilities in Fortune's annual World's Most Admired Electric and Gas Utility rankings.61
Southern Company (NYSE: SO) and AGL Resources announced July 1, 2016 the completion of a merger
creating one of America's leading energy providers.AGL Resources has become a wholly owned subsidiary of
Southern Company, which now has 11 electric and natural gas utilities with operations across the U.S.62
Page | G - 28 Electric
Guideline Companies 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
MarketSegment:GasDistribution
CompaniesIncludedintheGasDistributionMarketSegment
Atmos Energy Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Atmos Energy Corporation is engaged primarily in the distribution and sale of natural gas to roughly three
million customers through six regulated natural gas utility operations: Louisiana Division, West Texas Division,
Mid-Tex Division, Mississippi Division, Colorado-Kansas Division, and Kentucky/Mid-States Division. Gas
sales breakdown for fiscal 2015: 66%, residential; 29%, commercial; 3%, industrial; and 2% other. The company
has around 4,760 employees. Officers and directors own approximately 1.5% of common stock (12/15 Proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, is the country's largest natural-gas-only distributor, serving
about 3 million natural gas distribution customers in more than 1,400 communities in eight states from the Blue
Ridge Mountains in the East to the Rocky Mountains in the West. Atmos Energy also provides natural gas
marketing and procurement services to industrial, commercial and municipal customers primarily in the Midwest
and Southeast and manages company-owned natural gas pipeline and storage assets, including one of the largest
intrastate natural gas pipeline systems in Texas.67
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Distribution Companies that the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing.
April 28, 2016, shareholders approved renaming The Laclede Group (NYSE: LG) to Spire. Starting April 29, the
companys common stock shares will trade under the ticker symbol SR on the New York Stock Exchange.72
73 http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/NJR/1656564592x0x921029/97855792-93C0-4575-9FB7-
58999EBDDA53/NJR_AR_2016_FINAL_W_10K.PDF, accessed 12/22/2016
companys activities in the Marcellus Shale. South Jersey Energy Service Plus services heating, air conditioning
and water heating equipment in addition to performing energy audits.77
CompaniesNotIncludedintheGasDistributionMarketSegments
Adams Resources and Energy, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. engages in marketing crude oil, natural gas, and petroleum products. It
purchases crude oil and arranges sales and deliveries to refiners and other customers in Texas and Louisiana with
additional operations in Michigan and New Mexico; purchases, distributes, and markets natural gas; offers value
added services by providing access to common carrier pipelines and handling daily volume balancing
requirements, as well as risk management services. The company also markets branded and unbranded refined
petroleum products, such as motor fuels and lubricants. In addition, it transports liquid chemicals on a for-hire
basis in the continental United States and Canada, as well as engages in the exploration and development of
domestic oil and natural gas properties, primarily in Texas and the south central region of the United States.
Adams Resources holds interests in 513 producing wells of which 26 are company operated. Has 809 employees.
directors own 1.3% of common stock; BlackRock Inc., 9.6%; The Vanguard Group, Inc., 7.4%; GAMCO
Investors, Inc., 6.4% (3/16 Proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Southwest Gas Corporation (Southwest Gas or Company), headquartered in Las Vegas, NV, provides
natural gas service to over 1.9 million customers in Arizona, Nevada, and California. Centuri Construction
Group, Inc. (Centuri), a subsidiary, is a full-service underground piping contractor that primarily provides
utility companies with trenching and installation, replacement, and maintenance services for energy distribution
systems, and develops industrial construction solutions. Centuri operates in 20 major markets in the United
States (primarily under the NPL Construction Co. [NPL] name) and in two major markets in Canada (under
the Link-Line Contractors Ltd. and W.S. Nicholls Construction Inc. names).85
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: SWX) ("SWG Holdings") and Southwest Gas Corporation ("Southwest")
today [January 3, 2017] announced that, effective January 1, 2017, they completed the previously announced
reorganization of Southwest into a holding company structure. SWG Holdings is now the parent holding
company of Southwest, Centuri Construction Group, and their respective subsidiaries.86
expect that an investor will be allocated taxable income (mostly dividend income) regardless of whether a cash
distribution has been paid.87
MarketSegment:GasTransmissionPipelineand
FluidTransportationPipeline
CompaniesIncludedintheGasTransmissionPipelineMarketSegment
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, L.P. engages in the transportation, gathering, and storage of natural gas in the
United States. Customers include local gas distributors, interstate and intrastate pipelines, direct industrial users,
electric power generators, marketers, and producers. Owns and operates 14,525 miles of natural gas and NGL
pipelines. Storage capacity of 205 Bcf (natural gas) and 24 MMbls (NGLS). Of 2015 revenues, 79% derived
from firm contacts, 12% from volumes actually transported and 9% from interruptible services. Boardwalk GP,
L.P. is the general partner. Loews Corp. owns 51.6% of equity. Has 1,260 emplys.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (NYSE: BWP) is a midstream master limited partnership that provides
transportation, storage, gathering and processing of natural gas and liquids for our customers. Through our
subsidiaries, we own and operate approximately 14,090 miles of interconnected natural gas pipelines, directly
serving customers in thirteen states and indirectly serving customers throughout the northeastern and
southeastern United States through numerous interconnections with unaffiliated pipelines. We also own and
operate more than 435 miles of natural gas liquids (NGLs) pipelines in Louisiana and Texas. In 2015, our
pipeline systems transported approximately 2.4 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas and approximately 46.6
MMBbls of NGLs. Average daily throughput on our natural gas pipeline system during 2015 was approximately
6.7 Bcf. Our natural gas storage facilities are comprised of 14 underground storage fields located in four states
with an aggregate working gas capacity of approximately 205 Bcf, and our NGLs storage facilities consist of
nine salt-dome caverns located in Louisiana with an aggregate storage capacity of 24 MMBbls. We also own
three salt-dome caverns and a brine pond for use in providing brine supply services and to support the NGLs
storage operations.89
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in the transportation, gathering, and storage of natural gas.
Enterprise Products Partners
Company Summary from Value Line:
Enterprise Products Partners, LP, is a leading integrated provider of natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs)
processing, fractionation, transportation, and storage services in the U.S. and Canada. Acquired GulfTerra
Energy 9/04; TEPPCO, L.P. 10/09; M2 Midsteam, 5/10; Enterprise GP, 11/10; Oiltanking Partner, 2/15. Assets
include 49,000 miles of pipelines, 250 MMBbls of storage capacity for liquids and 14 Bcf for natural gas. Four
segments: NGL Pipeline (48% of 2015 revenues); Crude Oil Pipelines, (26%); Petrochemical & Refined
Products, (15%); Natural Gas Pipelines, (11%); Employs 6,900.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is one of the largest publicly traded partnerships and a leading North American
provider of midstream energy services to producers and consumers of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, refined
products and petrochemicals. Our services include: natural gas gathering, treating, processing, transportation and
storage; NGL transportation, fractionation, storage and import and export terminals; crude oil gathering,
transportation, storage and terminals; petrochemical and refined products transportation, storage and terminals;
and a marine transportation business that operates primarily on the United States inland and Intracoastal
Waterway systems.90
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in the transportation, gathering, and storage of natural gas.
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Kinder Morgan, Inc. owns the general partner and limited partner interests in both Kinder Morgan Energy
Partners, L.P. (KMP) and El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. (EPB). With more than 80,000 miles of pipelines and
180 terminals, it is the largest domestic transporter of petroleum products, natural gas, and carbon dioxide.
Kinder also owns the only pipeline that serves the West Coast of Canada. The company employs more than
11,535 individuals. Chairman & CEO: Richard D. Kinder. CFO: Kimberly Dang. Officers/directors own 14.0%
of the common stock; The Vanguard Group, 5.2% (4/16 proxy).
distributions and opportunities for new capital additions; and maximize the utilization of pipeline systems, with a
commitment to safe and reliable operations.
Additional Company Information from Website:
TC PipeLines, LP is a United States limited partnership with a long history of stable and growing cash
distributions which has delivered value to its investors while maintaining a solid cash distribution coverage ratio.
Through its disciplined investment philosophy, TC PipeLines now has investments in seven critical FERC
regulated, low-risk energy infrastructure pipelines, capable of moving 9.1 billion cubic feet per day of natural
gas. Revenues from these assets are derived almost entirely from fee-based charges. With access to new gas
supplies through support from its sponsor, TransCanada Corporation, who also operates our assets on our behalf,
TC PipeLines assets are primarily connected to one of the largest supply basins in North America that is
positioned to recover and grow over the next decade. With a strong and conservative balance sheet, a low general
partner cash take and an ample amount of available liquidity, we are well positioned for growth.93
Why was the company included?
Yes, this company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company owns and actively participates in the management of natural gas pipelines
and related assets.
Williams Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Williams Partners L.P. is a master limited partnership providing oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids
processing, fractionation, transportation, and storage services. Acquired by Access Midland Partners on 1/1/15 in
a stock swap. Access Partners continued to operate under the name of Williams Partners L.P. As of 1/16, has five
operating segments: Central; Northeast Gathering & Processing; Atlantic-Gulf; West; NGL and Petrochemicals
Services. Williams Partners GP, LLC is the companys general partner. Employs 6,578. The Williams
Companies (WMB) owns WPZs general partner and 73% of common units.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Demand for natural gas is tremendous and continues to grow because gas is cleaner, less expensive and more
efficient than other fuels capable of meeting around-the-clock energy demand. Williams (NYSE: WMB) and
Williams Partners (NYSE: WPZ) own and operate premier energy infrastructure across the United States,
including the largest volume and fastest growing interstate pipeline system in the U.S., connecting the best
supplies of natural gas and natural gas products to the best markets.94
Why was the company included?
Energy Transfer Equity announced merger on 9/28/2015 with the Williams Companies.95 The Williams
Companies owns Williams Partners, L.P. general partner and 73% of common units. This companys parent,
Energy Transfer Equity, announced a merger on 9/28/2015 with the Williams Companies.96 Mergers can make
analysts opinions of the company unreliable if they are considering the proposed merger.
CompaniesIncludedintheFluidTransportationPipelineMarketSegment
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Buckeye Partners, L.P., is a master limited partnership engaged in common carriage transportation of refined
petroleum products, including gasoline (50% of 15 volume), jet fuel (25%), distillates (23%), and other (2%).
Its subsidiaries own and operate 6,000 miles of pipeline mostly in the Northeast and upper Midwest. The L.P.
also owns 117 liquid petro. product terminals. Marine terminal Buckeye Bahamas Hub (formerly BORCO), is
one of the worlds largest. Acquired 80% Buckeye Texas Partners, 9/14; storage assets from Hess Corp., 12/13.
Off./Dir. own 0.4% of outstanding units; Tortoise Cap., 9.6%; ALPS Adv., 6.5% (4/16 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Buckeye Partners, L.P. (NYSE: BPL) is a publicly traded master limited partnership and owns and operates a
diversified network of integrated assets providing midstream logistic solutions, primarily consisting of the
transportation, storage, and marketing of liquid petroleum products. Buckeye is one of the largest independent
liquid petroleum products pipeline operators in the United States in terms of volumes delivered, with
approximately 6,000 miles of pipeline. Buckeye also uses its service expertise to operate and/or maintain third-
party pipelines and perform certain engineering and construction services for its customers. Additionally,
Buckeye is one of the largest independent terminalling and storage operators in the United States in terms
of capacity available for service.97
intrastate pipeline system. In September 2015, Holly Energy acquired 50% interest in Frontier Pipeline Co. from
an affiliate of Enbridge, Inc.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. ("HEP") is a Delaware limited partnership formed in early 2004 by HollyFrontier
and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas. HEP provides petroleum product and crude oil transportation,
terminalling, storage and throughput services to the petroleum industry, including HollyFrontier Corporation
subsidiaries. The Partnership, through its subsidiaries and joint ventures, owns and/or operates petroleum
product and crude gathering pipelines, tankage and terminals in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Washington,
Idaho, Oklahoma, Utah, Nevada, Wyoming and Kansas as well as refinery processing units in Kansas and
Utah.98
Why was the company not included?
This company is similar to the Fluid Transportation Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in the common transportation of refined petroleum products.
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P., engages in the transportation, storage, and distribution of hydrocarbons and
related products, largely in the U.S. Gulf coast and upper midwest regions. Segments: Refined products (73% of
15 Revs., 61% of operating income) has 9,500 miles of pipeline and 52 terminals; Crude oil (19%, 32%) has
1,700 miles of pipeline and storage capacity of 22 million barrels; Marine storage (8%, 7%) has storage capacity
of 26 million barrels. Acquired Longhorn Pipeline, 7/09; storage and pipeline from BP, 9/10. Employs 1,640.
Offs./dirs. own 0.3% of outstanding shares; Tortoise Cap. 7.0% (2/16 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. is a publicly traded oil pipeline, storage and transportation company based in
Tulsa, Okla. Formerly a part of Williams Companies, Magellan began trading as Williams Energy Partners in
February 2001. In September 2003, we changed our name to Magellan Midstream Partners and began trading
under the stock ticker MMP. In 2004, Magellan purchased significant assets from Shell, including more than 3,000
miles of refined product pipelines as well as terminals and storage capacity. In 2007, another acquisition expanded
Magellans footprint again with increased capabilities in Texas. In 2009, we bought the Longhorn Pipeline running
from Houston to El Paso. The reversal of this line has played a key part in Magellans growth the last few years.
In 2010, Magellan purchased another 100 miles of pipeline and 7.8 million barrels of storage from BP. In 2013,
Magellan acquired approximately 800 miles of refined petroleum products pipeline, four terminals and 1.7 million
barrels of storage from Plains All American Pipeline. This purchase added assets in Colorado, New Mexico, South
Dakota and Wyoming. Today, Magellan has 9,700-mile refined products pipeline system with 53 connected
terminals as well as 27 independent terminals not connected to our pipeline system and our 1,100-mile ammonia
pipeline system. In addition, we own approximately 2,100 miles of crude oil pipelines and storage facilities with
an aggregate storage capacity of about 23 million barrels, of which 15 million are used for leased storage. We also
operate five marine terminals located along coastal waterways with an aggregate storage capacity of approximately
26 million barrels.99
Why was the company not included?
This company is similar to, and is one of, the Fluid Transportation Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed
Section is responsible for valuing. The company engages in the common transportation of refined petroleum
products.
SAN ANTONIO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 21, 2016-- NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS) today announced that
it has signed an agreement to purchase crude oil and refined product storage assets in the Port of Corpus Christi
from Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (Nasdaq: MMLP) for a net $93 million. The acquisition, which is expected
to close by the end of the fourth quarter of 2016, is expected to be immediately accretive to NuStars earnings
based on the terminals current, actual volumes. It also reflects an approximate seven times multiple based on the
forecasted four-year average earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
attributable to the assets of $13.5 million annually. When combined with NuStars existing terminal operations
in Corpus Christi, the acquisition will give NuStar over 3.6 million barrels of total storage in the Port of Corpus
Christi, including 3.1 million barrels of crude oil storage and 577,000 barrels of refined product storage. The
terminal NuStar is acquiring includes 1.15 million barrels of total storage, which is comprised of 900,000 barrels
of crude oil storage and 250,000 barrels of refined product storage. The terminal has direct connectivity to Eagle
Ford crude oil production and receives crude oil and condensate via its connection to the Harvest Pipeline and
through its six-bay truck rack. The terminal has access to two of the ports deep-water crude oil docks, including
exclusive use of the ports new crude oil dock, and a barge dock. The terminal is located on 25 acres, and has
room for further expansion. NuStar also expects to achieve significant operational synergies between its existing
North Beach Terminal and the Martin terminal, which are located adjacent to each other in the Port of Corpus
Christi.101
Why was the company included?
This company is aligned with, and is one of, the fluid transportation companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing.
CompaniesNotIncludedintheGasTransmissionPipelineor
FluidTransportationMarketSegments
American Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
American Midstream Partners, LP is engaged in the business of gathering, treating, processing, and transporting
natural gas; gathering, transporting, storing, treating, and fractionating NGLs; gathering, storing, and
transporting crude oil and condensates; and storing specialty chemical products, all through ownership and
operation of 13 gathering systems, five processing facilities, three fractionation facilities, three interstate
pipelines, five intrastate pipelines, three marine terminal sites and one crude oil pipeline. In October 2016,
American Midstream and JP Energy Partners LP executed a merger agreement to create a combined midstream
platform. American Midstream will acquire 100% of JP Energy in a unit-for-unit merger. In conjunction with the
transaction, ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC, the sponsor of both American Midstream and JP Energy, will
combine the general partners of the two companies.
American Midstream Partners, LP was formed as a limited partnership for the purpose of operating, developing,
and acquiring a diversified portfolio of midstream energy assets. It provides natural gas gathering, treating,
processing, fractionating, marketing, and transportation services primarily in the Gulf Coast and Southeast
regions of the US through its ownership and operation of 12 gathering systems, five processing facilities, three
fractionation facilities, four marine terminal sites, three interstate pipelines, five intrastate pipelines, and one oil
pipeline. It operates more than 3,000 miles of pipelines that gather and transport over one Bcf/d of natural gas. In
October 2015, American Midstream acquired a minority interest in Delta House from an affiliate of ArcLight
Capital Partners, LLC, which controls the general partner of the partnership, for total consideration of $162
million. It acquired 25% of ArcLights 51.7% controlling interest in Delta House.
Partners. Archrock Partners financed the acquisition entirely with the issuance of 5,482,581 common units and
111,040 general partner units to affiliates of Archrock, Inc. Archrock, Inc. (AROC) is a pure-play U.S. natural
gas contract compression services business and a leading supplier of aftermarket services to customers that own
compression equipment in the United States. Archrock, Inc. holds interests in Archrock Partners, L.P. (APLP), a
master limited partnership and the leading provider of natural gas compression services to customers in the oil
and natural gas industry throughout the United States. Archrock, Inc. is headquartered in Houston, Texas,
operating in the major oil and gas producing regions in the United States, with approximately 1,700 employees.
Archrock Partners, L.P., a master limited partnership, is the leading provider of natural gas contract compression
services to customers throughout the United States. Archrock, Inc. owns an equity interest in Archrock Partners,
including all of the general partner interest.106
On November 4, 2015, Exterran Holdings, Inc. separated its international contract operations, international
aftermarket services and global fabrication businesses into a standalone, publicly traded company (Exterran
Corporation), resulting in two independent companies. The remaining company, now known as Archrock, Inc.,
is a pure-play U.S. compression services business, and it owns and operates the former Exterran U.S. contract
operations and U.S. aftermarket services businesses, including equity interest in Archrock Partners. Visit
www.exterran.com to reach the Exterran Corporation (NYSE:EXTN) website.107
Why was the company not included?
This company provides compression services. This business segment is not similar to the main business
segments of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Archrock Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Archrock Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership formed in June 2006, is the leading provider of natural
gas contract compression services. Its contract operations services primarily include designing, sourcing,
owning, installing, operating, servicing, repairing, and maintaining equipment to provide natural gas
compression services to customers. Archrock, Inc. owns an equity interest in Archrock Partners, including all of
the general partner interest. In October 2016, Archrock Partners agreed to acquire assets from Archrock, Inc.
including customer contracts serving 63 customers together with about 270 compressor units used to provide
compression services under those contracts, for consideration of approximately $85 million. The consideration to
be paid to Archrock, Inc.s affiliates will consist entirely of newly issued Archrock Partners common units and
general partner units.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Archrock Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:APLP), a master limited partnership, is the leading provider of natural gas
contract compression services to clients throughout the United States. An equity interest in the company is
owned by Archrock, Inc. (AROC), a pure-play U.S. natural gas contract compression services leader.108
Exterran Partners, L.P. (Nasdaq: EXLP), renamed Archrock Partners, L.P.109
On November 4, 2015, Exterran Holdings, Inc. separated its international contract operations, international
aftermarket services and global fabrication businesses into a standalone, publicly traded company (Exterran
Corporation), resulting in two independent companies. The remaining company, now known as Archrock, Inc.,
is a pure-play U.S. compression services business, and it owns and operates the former Exterran U.S. contract
operations and U.S. aftermarket services businesses, including equity interest in Archrock Partners. Visit
www.exterran.com to reach the Exterran Corporation (NYSE:EXTN) website.110
Why was the company not included?
This company provides compression services. This business segment is not similar to the main business
segments of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Azure Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Azure Midstream Partners, LP is a limited partnership formed to develop, own, operate, and acquire midstream
energy assets. It currently provides natural gas gathering, transportation, treating and processing services, NGL
transportation services, and crude oil transloading services. The partnerships assets include: one natural gas
processing facility located in Panola County, Texas with an approximate design capacity of 125 MMcf/d; an idle
natural gas processing facility located in Tyler County, Texas with an approximate design capacity of 80
MMcf/d; high- and low-pressure gathering lines that currently serve approximately 100,000 dedicated acres and
have access to seven major downstream markets, Panola County processing plants, and three third-party
processing plants; and two NGL transportation pipelines with an approximate design capacity of 20,000 Bbls/d
that connect its Panola County and Tyler County processing facilities to third party NGL pipelines. Has 111
employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Azure Midstream Partners, LP, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is a fee-based, growth-oriented limited
partnership formed to develop, operate, and acquire midstream energy assets. The Partnership provides natural
gas gathering, transportation, and processing services; as well as NGL transportation and crude oil logistics
services. The Partnership's assets include 963 miles of gathering lines in the Shelby Trough sub-play of the
Haynesville Shale and the horizontal Cotton Valley play located in east Texas and north Louisiana that are
capable of gathering 1.9 Bcf/d. The Partnership also has three natural gas processing facilities with 210 MMcf/d
of cumulative processing capacity located in the Panola, San Augustine and Tyler Counties of Texas, two NGL
transportation pipelines that connect its Panola County and Tyler County processing facilities to third party NGL
pipelines capable of transporting 20,000 barrels per day, and three crude oil transloading facilities containing six
crude oil transloaders with a combined capacity of 31,200 Bbls/d.111
Why was the company not included?
This company provides gathering and processing services. These business segments are not similar to the main
business segments of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Blueknight Energy Partners, LP (BKEP) owns and operates a diversified portfolio of complementary
midstream energy assets consisting of roughly 7.4 million barrels of crude oil storage in Oklahoma and Texas,
985 miles of crude oil pipeline primarily in Oklahoma and Texas, 240 crude oil transportation and oilfield
services vehicles deployed in Kansas, Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, and 8.2 million barrels of
combined asphalt product and residual fuel oil storage located at 45 terminals. In October 2016, BKEP
announced that Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions, Inc. acquired the entity that owns the general partner of BKEP.
Ergon also contributed nine asphalt terminals it owned plus $22.1 million of cash to BKEP for an aggregate of
18,312,968 series A preferred units; and acquired 847,457 common units for about $5.0 million. In addition,
BKEP repurchased 13,335,390 of its series A preferred units owned by Blueknight Energy Holding, Inc. and
CB-Blueknight, LLC for $95.3 million. Has 480 employees.
2016. All regulatory approvals have been received to construct and operate Train 3, and FID is expected to be
reached upon obtaining commercial contracts and financing sufficient enough to support construction. Cheniere
has also filed the NEPA pre-filing to commence the regulatory process on Train 4 and 5. Cheniere is also
engaged in LNG marketing and trading operations. Through its subsidiary, Cheniere Marketing, it is offering
LNG on an FOB or DAT basis to customers interested in purchasing LNG in the short and mid-term markets.
Cheniere Marketing LLC and its subsidiaries (Cheniere Marketing) has access to all excess nominal production
capacity not sold under long-term sale and purchase agreements to third parties. Cheniere continues to evaluate
the energy markets for additional development and/or marketing opportunities that would leverage the existing
platform and strategically fit within the Cheniere organization.113
engaged in LNG marketing and trading operations. Through its subsidiary, Cheniere Marketing, it is offering
LNG on an FOB or DAT basis to customers interested in purchasing LNG in the short and mid-term markets.
Cheniere Marketing LLC and its subsidiaries (Cheniere Marketing) has access to all excess nominal production
capacity not sold under long-term sale and purchase agreements to third parties. Cheniere continues to evaluate
the energy markets for additional development and/or marketing opportunities that would leverage the existing
platform and strategically fit within the Cheniere organization.114
TransCanada Corporation (NYSE:TRP) on July 1, 2016, and as a result, the Partnership is effectively managed
by TransCanada.116
Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina,
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
CrossAmerica Partners is headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania. Its downtown location plays an integral
part in the revitalization of the Lehigh Valley region's largest city.119
existing assets are integral to the success of Deleks refining and marketing operations. We gather, transport and
store crude oil and market, distribute, transport and store refined products in select regions of the southeastern
United States and west Texas for Delek and third parties, primarily in support of Deleks refineries in Tyler,
Texas and El Dorado, Arkansas.121
also owns the general partner, 100% of the incentive distribution rights, and 67.1 million common units of
Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (NYSE:SXL), which operates a geographically diverse portfolio of
complementary crude oil, refined products, and natural gas liquids pipeline, terminalling acquisition and
marketing assets which are used to facilitate the purchase and sale of crude oil, natural gas liquids, and refined
products. ETP's general partner is owned by Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. (NYSE:ETE).130
Nov. 21, 2016-- Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (NYSE: SXL) and Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE: ETP)
today announced that they have entered into a merger agreement providing for the acquisition of ETP by SXL in
a unit-for-unit transaction. The transaction was approved by the boards of directors and conflicts committees of
both partnerships and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2017, subject to receipt of ETP unitholder
approval and other customary closing conditions.131
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in the transportation, gathering, and storage of natural gas.
However, this company is currently entered in an agreement for its acquisition by Sunoco Logistics Partners,
L.P.
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Energy Transfer Equity, LP is a master limited partnership that owns the general partner and 100% of the
incentive distribution rights (IDRs) of Energy Transfer Partners, LP (ETP), and Sunoco, LP, (SUN). The
company also owns approximately 2.6 ETP million common units and approximately 81.0 million ETP class H
units, which track 90% of the underlying economics of the general partner interest and IDRs of Sunoco Logistics
Partners, LP. On a consolidated basis, the ETE family owns and operates approximately 71,000 miles of natural
gas pipeline. Has about 30,000 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. (NYSE:ETE) is a master limited partnership that owns the general partner and
100% of the incentive distribution rights (IDRs) of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE:ETP) and Sunoco LP
(NYSE:SUN). ETE also owns approximately 2.6 million ETP common units and approximately 81.0 million
ETP Class H Units, which track 90% of the underlying economics of the general partner interest and IDRs of
Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (NYSE:SXL). On a consolidated basis, the ETE family owns and operates
approximately 71,000 miles of natural gas, natural gas liquids, refined products, and crude oil pipelines.132
Nov. 21, 2016-- Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (NYSE: SXL) and Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE: ETP)
today announced that they have entered into a merger agreement providing for the acquisition of ETP by SXL in
a unit-for-unit transaction. The transaction was approved by the boards of directors and conflicts committees of
both partnerships and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2017, subject to receipt of ETP unitholder
approval and other customary closing conditions.133
parties across 24 counties in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio through its two primary assets: the
transmission and storage system, which serves as a header system transmission pipeline, and the gathering
system, which delivers natural gas from wells and other receipt points to transmission pipelines. The Partnership
believes that its strategically located assets, combined with its working relationship with EQT, position it as a
leading Appalachian Basin midstream energy company.135
Why was the company not included?
This companys operations are located in the Appalachian Basin, which is a different market than the market of
the companies for with the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Ferrellgas Partners, LP is engaged in the retail distribution of propane and related equipment sales; and
midstream operations, which is comprised of the following crude oil logistics segment and water solutions
segment. It is the sole limited partner of Ferrellgas, LP with an approximate 99% limited partner interest.
Ferrellgas Partners serve residential, industrial/commercial, portable tank exchange, agricultural, wholesale and
other customers in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. In the residential and
industrial/commercial markets, propane is primarily used for space heating, water heating, cooking and other
propane fueled appliances. In the portable tank exchange market, propane is used primarily for outdoor cooking
using gas grills. In the agricultural market, propane is primarily used for crop drying, space heating, irrigation
and weed control.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Reliable, flexible, capable thats what you get when you do business with Ferrellgas. Throughout our history,
weve prided ourselves on being not only propane industry leaders, but good neighbors to the approximately 1
million customers we serve nationwide. For nearly 80 years, Americans have depended on Ferrellgas, their
hometown propane provider. Our nationwide supply network means you have propane when and where you
need it. No matter how you use propane, or where you use it, Ferrellgas has you covered.136
Why was the company not included?
This companys main business segment is propane, which is a different business segment of the companies for
with the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Genesis Energy, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Genesis Energy, LP is focused on the midstream segment of the oil and gas industry in the Gulf Coast region of
the US, primarily Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, Wyoming, and in the Gulf of
Mexico. It has diverse portfolio of assets, including pipelines, offshore hub and junction platforms, storage tanks
and terminals, and rail loading and unloading facilities. Genesis operates through five divisions: onshore pipeline
transportation of crude oil and carbon dioxide (CO 2); offshore pipeline transportation and processing of crude
oil and natural gas; refinery services involving processing of high sulfur gas streams for refineries to remove the
sulfur, and selling the related by-product, sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS); marine transportation to provide
waterborne transportation of petroleum products and crude oil; and supply and logistics services, which include
terminaling, blending, storing, marketing, and transporting crude oil and petroleum products. Has about 1400
employees.
is different than the business segments of the companies for which the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing.
JP Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
JP Energy Partners, LP is a publicly traded, growth-oriented limited partnership that formed in May 2010 by
members of management and further capitalized by ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC to own, operate, develop,
and acquire a diversified portfolio of midstream energy assets. The companys operations currently consist of
crude oil pipelines and storage; refined products terminals and storage; and NGL distribution and sales, which
together provide midstream infrastructure solutions for the growing supply of crude oil, refined products and
NGLs in the United States. Its operations currently consist of three business segments: (i) crude oil pipelines and
storage, (ii) refined products terminals and storage and (iii) NGL distribution and sales. The company conducts
business through fee-based and margin-based arrangements.
Additional Company Information from Website:
JP Energy (NYSE: JPEP) is a master limited partnership focused on the gathering, storage and movement of
crude oil, refined products and natural gas liquids from production in key basins to consumer end markets. We
provide infrastructure solutions to producers, marketers and refiners of hydrocarbons and consumers in diverse
markets, helping navigate changing product flows and customer needs. Through our network of midstream
assets, we provide a means of connecting suppliers to customers through a full range of midstream services,
including supply and logistics, terminalling and storage.139
Why was the company not included?
This company operates one of the largest portable propane cylinder exchange businesses in the US. This
business segment is not similar to the business segments of the companies in which the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. Also, American Midstream and JP Energy Partners executed a merger agreement to
create a combined midstream platform
Martin Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Martin Midstream Partners, LP provides terminaling and storage services for petroleum products and by
products. Its four primary business lines include: natural gas services, including liquids transportation and
distribution services and natural gas storage; terminalling and storage services for petroleum products and by-
products including the refining of naphthenic crude oil, blending and packaging of finished lubricants; sulfur and
sulfur-based products processing, manufacturing, marketing and distribution; and marine transportation services
for petroleum products and by-products. The petroleum products and by-products the company collects,
transports, stores and markets are produced mainly by oil and gas companies. In October 2016, the company
entered into a definitive agreement with NuStar Logistics, L.P. to sell certain of its terminalling assets located in
Corpus Christi, Texas for gross consideration of $107 million plus the reimbursement of certain capital
expenditures and prepaid items.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with a diverse set of operations focused
primarily in the United States Gulf Coast region. Our four primary business lines include: Terminalling, storage
and packaging services for petroleum products and by-products including refining, blending and packaging of
finished lubricants; Natural gas liquids transportation and distribution services and natural gas storage; Sulfur
and sulfur-based products gathering, processing, manufacturing, marketing and distribution including fertilizer
manufacturing and distribution; Marine transportation services for petroleum products and by-products. The
petroleum products and by-products we collect, transport, store and distribute are produced primarily by the
independent oil and gas companies who often turn to third parties, such as us, for the transportation and
disposition of these products. In addition to these major and independent oil and gas companies, our primary
customers include independent refiners, large chemical companies, fertilizer manufacturers and other wholesale
purchasers of these products. We operate primarily in the Gulf Coast region of the U.S., which is a major hub for
petroleum refining, natural gas gathering and processing and support services for the exploration and production
industry. Our diversified asset base enables us to offer our customers an integrated distribution network
consisting of transportation terminalling, distribution and midstream logistical services.140
SAN ANTONIO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 21, 2016-- NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS) today announced that
it has signed an agreement to purchase crude oil and refined product storage assets in the Port of Corpus Christi
from Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (Nasdaq: MMLP) for a net $93 million. The acquisition, which is expected
to close by the end of the fourth quarter of 2016, is expected to be immediately accretive to NuStars earnings
based on the terminals current, actual volumes. It also reflects an approximate seven times multiple based on the
forecasted four-year average earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
attributable to the assets of $13.5 million annually. When combined with NuStars existing terminal operations
in Corpus Christi, the acquisition will give NuStar over 3.6 million barrels of total storage in the Port of Corpus
Christi, including 3.1 million barrels of crude oil storage and 577,000 barrels of refined product storage. The
terminal NuStar is acquiring includes 1.15 million barrels of total storage, which is comprised of 900,000 barrels
of crude oil storage and 250,000 barrels of refined product storage. The terminal has direct connectivity to Eagle
Ford crude oil production and receives crude oil and condensate via its connection to the Harvest Pipeline and
through its six-bay truck rack. The terminal has access to two of the ports deep-water crude oil docks, including
exclusive use of the ports new crude oil dock, and a barge dock. The terminal is located on 25 acres, and has
room for further expansion. NuStar also expects to achieve significant operational synergies between its existing
North Beach Terminal and the Martin terminal, which are located adjacent to each other in the Port of Corpus
Christi.141
Why was the company not included?
This company is mainly located in the Gulf Coast. The Gulf Coast is a different market than the market of the
companies for which the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Midcoast Energy Partners, LP is a limited partnership formed by Enbridge Partners to serve as Enbridge
Partners primary vehicle for owning and growing its natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) midstream
business in the United States. The companys assets consist of a 51.6% controlling interest in Midcoast
Operating, LP, a Texas limited partnership that owns a network of natural gas and NGL gathering and
transportation systems, natural gas processing and treating facilities, and NGL fractionation facilities primarily
located in Texas and Oklahoma. Midcoast Operating also owns and operates natural gas, condensate, and NGL
logistics and marketing assets that primarily support its gathering, processing, and transportation business. This
also includes approximately 11,100 miles of natural gas gathering and transportation lines, and approximately
233 miles of NGL gathering and transportation lines.
Midcoast Energy Partners, LP is a limited partnership formed by Enbridge Partners to serve as Enbridge
Partners primary vehicle for owning and growing its natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) midstream
business in the United States. The companys assets consist of a 51.6% controlling interest in Midcoast
Operating, LP, a Texas limited partnership that owns a network of natural gas and NGL gathering and
transportation systems, natural gas processing and treating facilities, and NGL fractionation facilities primarily
located in Texas and Oklahoma. Midcoast Operating also owns and operates natural gas, condensate, and NGL
logistics and marketing assets that primarily support its gathering, processing, and transportation business. This
also includes approximately 11,100 miles of natural gas gathering and transportation lines, and approximately
233 miles of NGL gathering and transportation lines.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P., (MEP) is a full-service natural gas and natural gas liquid (NGL) midstream
business. We're a growth-oriented limited partnership, formed by Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (EEP) to serve
as EEP's primary vehicle for owning and growing its natural gas and NGL midstream business in the United
States. MEP and EEP are part of the Enbridge Inc. family of companies. We remain focused on executing our
strategic objectives to grow the business by increasing our scale, expanding our scope, extending our reach and
enhancing our capabilities to deliver sustainable value to our unitholders over the long term. Our assets consist
of a 51.6 percent controlling interest in Midcoast Operating, a Texas limited partnership that owns a network of
natural gas and NGL gathering and transportation systems, natural gas processing and treating facilities and
NGL fractionation facilities primarily located in Texas and Oklahoma, which we refer to as the gathering,
processing and transportation business. Midcoast Operating also owns and operates natural gas, condensate and
NGL logistics and marketing assets, referred to as the Logistics and Marketing business, that supports its
Gathering, Processing and Transportation business. Through our ownership of Midcoast Operatings general
partner, we control, manage and operate these systems. EEP has retained a 48.4 percent non-controlling interest
in Midcoast Operating. The Gathering, Processing and Transportation business primarily consists of gathering
unprocessed and untreated natural gas from wellhead locations and other receipt points on our systems,
processing the natural gas to remove NGLs and impurities at our processing and treating facilities, and
transporting the processed natural gas and NGLs to intrastate and interstate pipelines for transportation to various
customers and market outlets. The Logistics and Marketing business markets natural gas, NGLs and condensate
received from the gathering, processing and transportation business to wholesale customers. Midcoast Energy
Partners, L.P. is headquartered in Houston, Texas.142
MPLX. MPLX is engaged in the gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas; the gathering,
transportation, fractionation, storage and marketing of natural gas liquids (NGLs); and the gathering,
transportation and storage of crude oil and refined petroleum products. MPLX provides services in the
midstream sector across the hydrocarbon value chain through its Logistics and Storage and Gathering and
Processing segments.143
partnerships, which owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply
in the Mid-Continent, Permian and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers and is a leader in the
gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500
company and is included in Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Stock Index.145
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because we used ONEOK Partners, L.P.
PBF Logistics, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
PBF Logistics, LP is a fee-based, growth oriented master limited partnership formed by PBF Energy,
Inc. to own or lease, operate, develop and acquire crude oil and refined petroleum products terminals, pipelines,
storage facilities, and similar logistics assets. The company operates in two segments: Transportation and
Terminaling, and Storage. The transportation and terminaling segment consists of the DCR Rail Terminal, which
serves PBF Holdings Delaware City and Paulsboro refineries; the DCR West Rack, which serves PBF
Holdings Delaware City refinery; the Toledo Truck Terminal, which serves PBF Holdings Toledo refinery,
comprised of LACT units; a propane truck loading facility, located within the Toledo Storage Facility, the
Delaware City Products Pipeline, and the Delaware City Truck Rack, which consists of a truck loading rack
utilized to distribute gasoline. The storage segment consists of the Toledo Storage Facility
Additional Company Information from Website:
PBFX is a fee-based, growth-oriented, Delaware master limited partnership formed in February 2013 by
subsidiaries of PBF Energy Inc. and its indirect subsidiary, PBF Logistics GP LLC (PBF GP), our general
partner, to own or lease, operate, develop and acquire crude oil and refined petroleum products terminals,
pipelines, storage facilities and similar logistics assets. PBF GP is our general partner and is wholly-owned by
PBF Energy Company LLC (PBF LLC). PBF Energy Inc. is the sole managing member of PBF LLC and as of
December 31, 2015 owned 95.1% of the total economic interest in PBF LLC. We refer you to Organizational
Structure below for an illustration of our relationship with PBF Energy Inc.146
Why was the company not included?
This companys market segments are terminaling and storage. A main business segment of the companies the
State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing is fluid transportation pipeline services or gas transmission
pipeline services.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Pembina Pipeline Corp. gathers, processes, and transports oil and natural gas in Western Canada. It owns and
operates an integrated system of pipelines, gas gathering and processing facilities, and an oil and NGL
infrastructure and logistics line. 2015 net revenues (operating income): Conventional Pipelines: 42% (36%); Oil
Sands & Heavy Oil: 14% (13%); Midstream: 30% (38%); Gas Services: 14% (13%). Daily 2015 liquids
throughput: 1.72 mill. barrels; Oil Sands & Heavy Oil, 51%; Conventional Pipelines, 36%; Midstream NGLs,
7%; Gas Services, 6%. Acqd Provident Energy, 4/12. Has 1,111 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are Calgary-based, and own and operate pipelines that transport conventional and synthetic crude oil and
natural gas liquids produced in western Canada; oil sands and heavy oil pipelines; gas gathering and processing
facilities; and, an oil and natural gas liquids infrastructure and logistics business. With facilities strategically
located in western Canada and in natural gas liquids markets in eastern Canada and the U.S., Pembina also offers
a full spectrum of midstream and marketing services that span across our operations. Our integrated assets and
commercial operations enable us to offer services needed by the energy sector along the hydrocarbon value
chain.147
Why was the company not included?
This company is not traded on an American Stock Exchange.
Phillips 66 Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Phillips 66 Partners, LP owns, operates, develops, and acquires primarily fee-based crude oil, refined petroleum
product, and natural gas liquids pipelines and terminals, and other transportation and midstream assets. Its assets
include the Clifton Ridge crude oil pipeline, terminal, and storage system in Louisiana; the Sweeny to Pasadena
refined petroleum product pipeline, terminal, and storage system in Texas; two refinery-grade propylene storage
spheres in Medford, Oklahoma; a refined petroleum product pipeline system (Gold Line) that runs from the
Phillips 66 jointly owned and operated refinery in Borger, Texas, to Cahokia, Illinois; and the Hartford
Connector refined petroleum product pipeline, terminal, and storage system in Illinois. In October 2016, Phillips
66 Partners, LP reached an agreement with Phillips 66 (PSX) to acquire 30 crude, refined products and natural
gas liquids (NGL) logistics assets for total consideration of $1.3 billion. Has 1313 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Phillips 66 Partners (NYSE: PSXP) began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on July 23, 2013.
Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Phillips 66 Partners is a growth-oriented master limited partnership formed by
Phillips 66 to own, operate, develop and acquire primarily fee-based crude oil, refined petroleum product and
natural gas liquids (NGL) pipelines and terminals and other transportation and midstream assets.148
Why was the company not included?
This company began trading publicly on July 23, 2013. We would consider this company for the 2018 or 2019
Capitalization Rate Studies.
Plains GP Holdings, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Plains GP Holdings, LP was formed to own an interest in the general partner and incentive distribution rights of
Plains All American Pipeline, LP, which owns and operates midstream energy infrastructure and provides
logistics services for crude oil, natural gas liquids (NGL), natural gas, and refined products in the US and
Canada. The company is involved in transporting crude oil and NGL on pipelines, gathering systems, trucks, and
barges. It provides storage, terminalling, and throughput services for crude oil, refined products, NGL, and
natural gas; NGL fractionation and isomerization services; and natural gas and condensate processing services. It
is involved in merchant-related activities, such as purchase of crude oil, cargos, and NGL; storage of inventory
and NGL; and resell or exchange, and transport of crude oil and NGL. At September 2016, it owned 13 million
barrels of crude oil and NGL line fill; 990 trucks and 1,100 trailers; and 10,100 crude oil and NGL railcars. Has
about 5400 employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Plains GP Holdings owns an interest in PAA's [Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.] general partner, which owns
the 2% general partner interest and incentive distribution rights of PAA. PAGP makes quarterly distributions of
its available cash to Shareholders of record. PAGP completed its initial public offering in October 2013 and its
shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PAGP. Investors in PAGP receive a
1099, versus a K-1.149
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because we used Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
Rose Rock Midstream, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Not available.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Rose Rock Midstream specializes in crude oil gathering, transportation, storage and marketing in some of the
best resource plays in North America. We serve areas that are experiencing strong production growth and
drilling activity through our exposure to the: Bakken Shale in North Dakota and Montana; Denver-Julesburg
(DJ) Basin and the Niobrara Shale in the Rocky Mountain region; Eagle Ford Formation, Granite Wash and
Mississippian oil trend in the Mid-Continent region; and Utica Basin in Ohio. We own and operate a network of
more than 1,900 miles of crude oil pipelines and 10.1 million barrels of crude storage. The majority of our assets
are strategically located in or connected to the Cushing, Oklahoma crude oil marketing hub, the designated point
of delivery specified in all NYMEX crude oil futures contracts and one of the largest crude oil marketing hubs in
the United States. Our midstream services are further extended with our Field Services trucking division. Our
fleet of more than 250 trucks follow the drilling, acting as mobile extensions of our operations. Together, our
assets offer the connectivity and flexibility needed to support the growing demand for midstream services
throughout the U.S.150
9/30/2016 TULSA, Okla., Sept. 30, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- SemGroup Corporation (NYSE:SEMG)
today announced that it has completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding common units of Rose Rock
Midstream, L.P. (NYSE:RRMS) not already owned by the company.151
Why was the company not included?
Rose Rock Midstream, L.P. was acquired by SemGroup Corporation on 9/30/2016.
SemGroup Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Not available.
Additional Company Information from Website:
SemGroup Corporation is a growth-oriented midstream company that specializes in moving energy. We own,
operate, develop and acquire a diversified portfolio of midstream energy assets in the United States, Canada,
Mexico and the United Kingdom. Our assets are strategically located in growing oil and gas producing areas and
interconnected with key markets and logistics centers. Through our subsidiaries, our expanding footprint reaches
across multiple shale and natural resource plays including: the Bakken Shale, DJ/Niobrara, Eagle Ford,
Mississippi Lime Play, Montney/Duvernay and Utica Basin. Our key operations include: Transporting, storing,
terminaling and trucking crude oil; Gathering, compressing, treating, processing and selling natural gas; Storing
and terminaling refined petroleum products; Supplying and applying liquid asphalt cement in Mexico.152
9/30/2016 TULSA, Okla., Sept. 30, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- SemGroup Corporation (NYSE:SEMG)
today announced that it has completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding common units of Rose Rock
Midstream, L.P. (NYSE:RRMS) not already owned by the company.153
Why was the company not included?
This companys assets are not closely related to the assets of companys that the State Assessed Property Section
is responsible for valuing. Only a portion of this companys assets include fluid transportation pipeline services.
Shell Midstream Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Shell Midstream Partners, LP is a growth oriented master limited partnership formed by Shell Pipeline Co. LP to
own, operate, develop and acquire pipelines and other midstream assets. As of September 2016, it owned
interests in three crude oil pipeline systems and two refined products systems. The crude oil pipeline systems,
which are held by Zydeco Pipeline Co. LLC, Mars Oil Pipeline Co., and Poseidon Oil Pipeline Co., LLC, are
located along the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast and in the Gulf of Mexico. These systems link major onshore
and offshore production areas with key refining markets. The refined products pipeline systems, which are held
by Bengal Pipeline Co. and Colonial Pipeline Co., connect Gulf Coast and southeastern US refineries to major
demand centers from Alabama to New York. In September 2016, the company agreed to acquire from Shell an
additional 20% equity interest in Mars Oil Pipeline Company and a 49% equity interest in Odyssey Pipeline,
LLC for $350 million.
Additional Company Information from Website:
We are a fee-based, growth-oriented master limited partnership recently formed by Shell to own, operate,
develop and acquire pipelines and other midstream assets. Our initial assets consist of interests in entities that
own crude oil and refined products pipelines serving as key infrastructure to transport growing onshore and
offshore crude oil production to Gulf Coast refining markets and to deliver refined products from those markets
to major demand centers.154
Why was the company not included?
This company is mainly services the Gulf Coast (including offshore assets), the Gulf Coast to New York City,
and the Gulf Coast to the Midwest. The Explorer pipeline system from the Gulf Coast to the Midwest transports
gasoline, diesel, fuel oil, and jet fuel from the US Gulf Coast to Hammon, IL. The Explorer pipeline system is
the companys only asset that is similar to the companies the State Assessed Property Section is responsible for
valuing. The Explorer pipeline system is not a large enough portion of the companys overall business segments.
Also, this company was formed on March 19, 2014.
Southcross Energy Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Southcross Energy Partners, LP provides natural gas gathering, processing, treating, compression, and
transportation services in the United States. The company operations provide a full range of complementary
services extending from wellhead to market, including gathering natural gas at the wellhead, treating natural gas
to meet downstream pipeline and customer quality standards, processing natural gas to separate NGLs (natural
gas liquids) from the natural gas, fractionating the resulting NGLs into the various components and selling or
delivering pipeline quality natural gas and NGLs to various industrial and energy markets, as well as large
pipeline systems. The company operates four gas processing plants, two fractionation plants, and approximately
3,138 miles of pipeline in south Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama. The company was founded in 2009 and is
headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Southcross Energy Partners, LP is a subsidiary of Southcross Holdings
Borrower, LP.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Southcross Energy Partners, L.P. (Southcross) is a master limited partnership that provides natural gas
gathering, processing, treating, compression and transportation services and NGL fractionation and
transportation services. It also sources, purchases, transports and sells natural gas and NGLs. Its assets are
located in South Texas, Mississippi and Alabama and include four gas processing plants, two fractionation plants
and approximately 3,100 miles of pipeline. The South Texas assets are located in or near the Eagle Ford shale
region. Southcross is headquartered in Dallas, Texas Our integrated operations provide a full range of
complementary services extending from wellhead to market, including gathering natural gas at the wellhead,
treating natural gas to meet downstream pipeline and customer quality standards, processing natural gas to
separate NGLs from the natural gas, fractionating the resulting NGLs into the various components and selling or
delivering pipeline quality natural gas and NGLs to various industrial and energy markets as well as large
pipeline systems. Through our network of pipelines, we provide the means of connecting our suppliers of natural
gas to our customers, which include industrial, commercial and power generation customers and local
distribution companies.155
Why was the company not included?
This company is located in Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama. Those locations are in a different market than the
market of the companies for which the State Assessed Section is responsible for valuing.
Spectra Energy Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
Spectra Energy Corp gathers, processes, transmits, stores, and distributes natural gas in North America. The
company was spun off from Duke Energy (1/07). Spectra operates approximately 21,000 miles of transmission
pipeline and around 300 billion cubic feet of storage capacity in the U.S. and Canada. Its crude oil pipeline,
Express-Platte consists of over 1,700 miles. 2015 revenues: Spectra Energy Partners, 46%; Distribution, 29%;
Western Canada Transmission & Processing, 25%; Field Services, NMF. Has about 6,000 employees. Off./dir.
own less than 1% of stock, BlackRock, 6.2%; Vanguard, 6.2% (4/16 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Spectra Energy Corp (NYSE: SE), a FORTUNE 500 company, is one of North America's leading pipeline and
midstream companies. Based in Houston, Texas, the company's operations in the United States and Canada
include approximately 21,000 miles of natural gas and crude oil pipelines; approximately 300 billion cubic feet
(Bcf) of natural gas storage; 4.8 million barrels of crude oil storage; as well as natural gas gathering, processing,
and local distribution operations. 156
December 15, 2016 HOUSTON Spectra Energy Corp (NYSE: SE) (Spectra Energy) announced that during a
special stockholder meeting held earlier today, Spectra Energy stockholders voted overwhelmingly to approve
the previously announced combination of Spectra Energy with Enbridge Inc. (TSX, NYSE: ENB) (Enbridge)
in a stock-for-stock merger transaction. Approximately 73 percent of the total outstanding shares of Spectra
Energy common stock, and approximately 98 percent of the total shares voted at the meeting, were voted in
favor of the transaction. Once the transaction is completed, the combination will create the largest energy
infrastructure company in North America and one of the largest globally, with a pro-forma enterprise value of
approximately C$165 billion (US$127 billion).157
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because we would use Spectra Energy Partners, L.P.
157 http://www.spectraenergy.com/Newsroom/News-Archive/Spectra-Energy-Stockholders-Overwhelmingly-Approve-
Merger-With-Enbridge/, accessed 1/4/2017
158 http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=211014&p=irol-IRHome, accessed 12/28/2016
159 http://www.spectraenergy.com/Transaction/, accessed 12/28/2016
approximately 1.1 million residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural customers through 675
locations.161
about 900 miles of NGLs pipelines, primarily in the northeast and southwest United States. The Refined
Products Pipelines segment has about 1,800 pipeline miles. In October 2012, became a consolidated subsidiary
of Energy Transfer Partners, LP. No employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (NYSE: SXL) is a master limited partnership that owns and operates a logistics
business consisting of a geographically diverse portfolio of complementary crude oil, natural gas liquids, and
refined products pipeline, terminalling and acquisition and marketing assets which are used to facilitate the
purchase and sale of crude oil, natural gas liquids, and refined products. SXLs general partner is a consolidated
subsidiary of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE: ETP). Our business is characterized by extensive industry
and safety experience, strong financial fundamentals, and operational flexibility. Collectively, a strong asset base
and the successful execution of our business strategies have consistently delivered substantial returns to
unitholders.163
Nov. 21, 2016-- Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (NYSE: SXL) and Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE: ETP)
today announced that they have entered into a merger agreement providing for the acquisition of ETP by SXL in
a unit-for-unit transaction. The transaction was approved by the boards of directors and conflicts committees of
both partnerships and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2017, subject to receipt of ETP unitholder
approval and other customary closing conditions.164
Why was the company not included?
This company is similar to the Gas Transmission Pipeline Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in the transportation, gathering, and storage of natural gas.
However, this company is currently entered in an agreement to acquire by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
Tallgrass Energy GP, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Tallgrass Energy GP, LP (TEGP) is a limited partnership that has elected to be treated as a corporation for United States
federal income tax purposes. TEGP owns a controlling membership interest in Tallgrass Equity, LLC through its role as the
sole managing member. Tallgrass Equity, LLC owns, both directly and through its ownership of the general partner of
Tallgrass Energy Partners, LP, (TEP), all of TEPs incentive distribution rights, 100 % of the general partner interest in
TEP and 20,000,000 TEP common units. It provides natural gas transportation and storage services for customers in the
Rocky Mountain and Midwest regions. It performs water business services in Colorado and Texas through BNNWater
Solutions, LLC. Its operations are located in and provide services to certain main US hydrocarbon basins, including the
Denver-Julesburg, Powder River, Wind River, Permian and Hugoton-Anadarko Basins and the Niobrara, Mississippi Lime,
Eagle Ford, and Bakken shale formations. Has 9 employees.
Tallgrass Energy Partners, LP (NYSE: TEP) is a publicly traded, growth-oriented limited partnership formed to
own, operate, acquire and develop midstream energy assets in North America. We currently provide crude oil
transportation to customers in Wyoming, Colorado, and the surrounding regions through Tallgrass Pony Express
Pipeline, LLC, which owns a crude oil pipeline commencing in Guernsey, Wyoming and terminating in Cushing,
Oklahoma that includes a lateral in Northeast Colorado that commences in Weld County, Colorado, and
interconnects with the pipeline just east of Sterling, Colorado. We provide natural gas transportation and storage
services for customers in the Rocky Mountain, Midwest and Appalachian regions of the United States through:
(1) our 25% membership interest in Rockies Express Pipeline LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which
owns the Rockies Express Pipeline, a FERC-regulated natural gas pipeline system extending from Opal,
Wyoming and Meeker, Colorado to Clarington, Ohio, (2) the Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission system, a
FERC-regulated natural gas transportation and storage system located in Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
and Wyoming, and (3) the Trailblazer Pipeline system, a FERC-regulated natural gas pipeline system extending
from the Colorado and Wyoming border to Beatrice, Nebraska. We also provide services for customers in
Wyoming at the Casper and Douglas natural gas processing facilities and the West Frenchie Draw natural gas
treating facility, and NGL transportation services in Northeast Colorado. We perform water business services in
Colorado and Texas through BNN Water Solutions, LLC. Our operations are strategically located in and provide
services to certain key United States hydrocarbon basins, including the Denver-Julesburg, Powder River, Wind
River, Permian and Hugoton-Anadarko Basins and the Niobrara, Mississippi Lime, Eagle Ford, Bakken,
Marcellus and Utica shale formations. 167
Shale/Williston Basin area of North Dakota and Montana, which gathers and transports crude oil from various
production locations. It owns and operates the northwest products pipeline and a jet fuel pipeline; 20 crude oil
and refined products terminals and storage facilities in the western and midwestern US; four marine terminals in
California; a rail-car unloading facility in Washington; a petroleum coke handling and storage facility in Los
Angeles; and other pipelines, which transport products and crude oil from refineries to nearby facilities in Salt
Lake City and Los Angeles. In September 2016, Tesoro Logistics, LP acquired the refined products terminals in
Anchorage and Fairbanks, Alaska, with combined storage capacity of over 600,000 barrels.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Tesoro Logistics has capabilities in gathering, processing, fractionation, stabilization, storage, terminalling and
transportation for inbound and outbound logistics needs. We handle crude oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids,
refined product and water. Our operations include pipeline, rail, marine and trucking. Built from Tesoros proven
heritage, Tesoro Logistics has invested in and developed this complete set of skills and range of assets to better
meet the needs of our customers, serve the American energy market and position ourselves for continued growth.
We combine midstream experience in key basins, like the Bakken and Uinta, with detailed knowledge of
transportation networks from the mid-continent to the west coast. We understand what it takes to operate in
changing, challenging environments and are primed for new business. Tesoro Logistics offers cost efficient
services for a full suite of petroleum products across the supply chain.170
one of the continents largest providers of gas storage and related services. A growing independent power
producer, TransCanada owns or has interests in over 10,700 megawatts of power generation.171
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because we use TC PipeLines, L.P.
TransMontaigne Partners, L.P.
Company Summary from Value Line:
TransMontaigne Partners, LP is a terminaling and transportation company with operations in the US along the
Gulf Coast, in the Midwest, in Houston and Brownsville, TX, along the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers, and in the
southeast. It offers integrated terminaling, storage, transportation, and related services for customers engaged in
the distribution and marketing of light refined petroleum products (including gasolines, diesel fuels, heating oil,
and jet fuels); heavy refined petroleum products such as residual fuel oils and asphalt; crude oil, chemicals,
fertilizers; and other liquid products. It operates 7.1 million barrel terminal facility on the Houston Ship Channel;
eight refined product terminals in Florida with about 6.9 million barrels of aggregate active storage capacity; and
a 67-mile interstate refined products pipeline between Missouri and Arkansas, and two refined product terminals
in Missouri and Arkansas with an aggregate active storage capacity of about 421,000 barrels. Has 510
employees.
Additional Company Information from Website:
TransMontaigne Partners L.P. (NYSE: TLP) is a terminaling and transportation master limited partnership
providing integrated terminaling, storage, transportation and related services for customers engaged in the
distribution and marketing of petroleum products, crude oil, chemicals, fertilizers and other liquid products.172
Assets consist of crude oil and refined petroleum products pipeline and terminal systems in the Gulf Coast and
Mid-Continent regions of the United States, which are integral to the operations of Valeros refineries located in
Port Arthur, Sunray (McKee refinery), Houston, Three Rivers and Corpus Christi (Bill Greehey refineries),
Texas; Meraux and Norco (St. Charles refinery), La.; Memphis, Tenn.; and Ardmore, Okla. The Port Arthur
Logistics System includes the Lucas Crude System and the Port Arthur Products System. The McKee Logistics
System consists of the McKee Crude System, the McKee Products System and the McKee Terminal. The
Memphis Logistics System includes the Collierville Crude System and the Memphis Products System. The
Wynnewood Products System is the primary distribution outlet for the Ardmore refinery. The Three Rivers
Logistics System includes the Three Rivers Crude System, which connects domestically produced crude oil to
the Three Rivers refinery, and the Three Rivers Terminal. The Houston Terminal is a crude oil, intermediates
and refined petroleum products terminal that supports the Houston refinery. The St. Charles Terminal is a crude
oil, intermediates and refined petroleum products terminal serving the St. Charles refinery. The Corpus Christi
Terminals operate crude oil, intermediates and refined petroleum products terminals that support the Bill
Greehey refineries east and west plants. The Meraux Terminal is a crude oil, intermediates and refined petroleum
products terminal supporting the Meraux refinery.173
petroleum distribution plants and a fleet of crude oil and refined product delivery trucks. WNRL distributes
wholesale petroleum products primarily in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Texas.177
Why was the company not included?
This company has many business segments and the main business segments do not include pipeline
transportation services. A main business segment of the companies the State Assessed Section is responsible for
valuing is a fluid transportation pipeline services or gas transmission pipeline services.
Williams Companies, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
The Williams Companies, Inc., gathers, processes, and transports natural gas throughout the United States. It
also performs gas marketing services. Acquired Access Midstream Partners, 7/14; Barrett Resources, 8/01;
MAPCO, 3/98. Sold Texas Gas Pipeline, 5/03; Kern River Pipeline, 3/02. Spun off Williams Communications,
4/01; WPX Energy, 1/12. Initial public offering for Williams Partners L.P., 8/05; Williams Pipeline Partners
L.P., 1/08. Has about 4,910 employees. Off./dir. own less than 8.9% of common shares; Corvex Management
LP/Soroban Master Fund LP, 8.4%; The Vanguard Group, 5.8% (4/16 Proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Williams, including its assets held through Williams Partners L.P., is an energy infrastructure company focused
on connecting North Americas significant hydrocarbon resource plays to growing markets for natural gas,
natural gas liquids (NGLs) and olefins. Williams operations span from the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Williams
owns and operates midstream gathering and processing assets, and interstate natural gas pipelines. In addition,
Williams produces olefins for petrochemical feedstocks. Williams headquarters are located in Tulsa,
Okla. Other major offices are in Houston, Pittsburgh, Oklahoma City and Salt Lake City. Founded in 1908,
Williams employs more than 5,600 people and is an equal opportunity employer. The Company does not
discriminate in any employer/employee relations based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity and expression, national origin, age, marital status, disability, military status, genetic information or any
other basis protected by applicable discrimination laws. Williams common stock (WMB) and Williams Partners
units (WPZ) are listed on the New York Exchange.178
Why was the company not included?
This company was not included because we would use Williams Partners, L.P.
World Fuel Services Corp.
Company Summary from Value Line:
World Fuel Services Corp., a leading global fuel logistics company, is engaged in the worldwide marketing and
sale of marine, aviation, and land fuel products and related services. Its Marine segment offers fuel and related
services to maritime customers, including international container and tanker fleets among others. The Aviation
segment provides aviation fuel to commercial airlines, and others. The Land segment provides fuel and related
services to petroleum distributors among others. Has 2,758 employees. Officers/Directors own 2.3% of shares
(4/16 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
World Fuel Services Corporation (NYSE: INT) is a Fortune 100 company providing aviation, marine and land
energy, logistics, and technology solutions to customers and suppliers around the world. Our global team of local
professionals delivers innovative products and services at more than 8,000 global locations.179
MarketSegment:Railroad,ClassIandOtherRailroads
CompaniesIncludedintheRailroadMarketSegment
Canadian National Railway Company
Company Summary from Value Line:
Canadian National Railway operates Canadas largest railroad system with 20,000 route miles spanning East-
West across Canada and North-South to the Gulf of Mexico through the U.S. Midwest. Acquired Wisconsin
Central 10/01; BC Rail and GLT mid- 04; EJ&E 1/09. Petroleum & Chemicals, 19% of 15 revenues; Metals &
Minerals, 11%; Forest Products, 14%; Intermodal, 23%; Coal, 5%; Grain & Fertilizer, 16%; Automotive, 6%;
Other, 6%. 2015 labor costs: 19% of revenue. 2015 operating ratio: 58.2%. Has about 23,170 employees.
Offs./dirs. own or control 0.2% of stock (2015 40-F).
Additional Company Information from Website:
CN [Canadian National] is engaged in the rail and related transportation business. CNs network of
approximately 20,000 route miles of track spans Canada and mid-America, uniquely connecting three coasts: the
Atlantic, the Pacific and the Gulf of Mexico. CNs extensive network and efficient connections to all Class I
railroads provide CN customers access to all three North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) nations. A
true backbone of the economy, CN handles over $250 billion worth of goods annually and carries more than 300
million tons of cargo, serving exporters, importers, retailers, farmers and manufacturers. CNs freight revenues
are derived from seven commodity groups representing a diversified and balanced portfolio of goods transported
between a wide range of origins and destinations. This product and geographic diversity better positions the
Company to face economic fluctuations and enhances its potential for growth opportunities. In 2015, no
individual commodity group accounted for more than 23% of total revenues. From a geographic standpoint, 18%
of revenues relate to United States (U.S.) domestic traffic, 33% transborder traffic, 18% Canadian domestic
traffic and 31% overseas traffic. The Company is the originating carrier for approximately 85% of traffic moving
along its network, which allows it both to capitalize on service advantages and build on opportunities to
efficiently use assets.181
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to (and is the parent of) the railroad companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in railroad transportation services.
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
Company Summary from Value Line:
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited provides rail and intermodal freight transportation services over a 12,500-mile
network from Montreal to Vancouver. It extends into the U.S. midwest and northeast via Soo Line, Delaware &
Hudson, and DM&E (purchased 10/4/07) subsidiaries. Alliances with other carriers extend market reach beyond
its owned network. Grain shipments 24%, of 2015 freight revenue; intermodal, 21%; coal, 10%; other, 45%.
Operating ratio in 2015: 61.0%. Employs 12,900 as of 12/31/15. T. Rowe Price Assoc. owns 10.8% of common
(2016 proxy). Pershing Square sold its 9.1% stake over the summer of 2016.
Additional Company Information from Website:
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CPRL), together with its subsidiaries (CP or the Company), operates a
transcontinental railway in Canada and the United States (U.S.). CPs diverse business mix includes bulk
commodities, merchandise freight and intermodal traffic over a network of approximately 12,500 miles, serving
the principal business centres of Canada from Montreal, Quebec, to Vancouver, British Columbia, and the U.S.
Northeast and Midwest regions.182
Why was the company included?
This company is similar to (and is the parent of) the Railroad Companies that the State Assessed Section is
responsible for valuing. The company engages in railroad transportation services.
CSX Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
CSX Corporation provides rail, intermodal transportation, and rail-to-truck transload services. Has about 21,000
route miles in 23 states and two Canadian provinces, with links to more than 240 short-line railroads. Connects
the Northeast, Midwest, and Canada with the Southeast. Principal freight: coal, fertilizer, chemicals, automobiles
& parts, agricultural products, and intermodal cargo. Sold CSX Lines 2/03; CSX World Terminals 2/05. 2015
rail operating ratio: 69.7%. Ave. employee count in Q4 2015: 29,760. Capital Research owns 8.7% of common;
Vanguard Group 6.2%; offs/dirs less than 1% (3/16 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
CSX Corporation, together with its subsidiaries based in Jacksonville, Fla., is one of the nation's leading
transportation suppliers. The companys rail and intermodal businesses provide rail-based transportation services
including traditional rail service and the transport of intermodal containers and trailers. Overall, the CSX
Transportation network encompasses about 21,000 route miles of track in 23 states, the District of Columbia and
the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec. Our transportation network serves some of the largest population
centers in the nation. Nearly two-thirds of Americans live within CSXs service territory. Our transportation
network serves some of the largest population centers in the nation. Nearly two-thirds of Americans live within
CSXs service territory. CSX serves major markets in the eastern United States and has access to over 70 ocean,
river and lake port terminals along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, the Mississippi River, the Great Lakes and the
St. Lawrence Seaway. The company also has access to Pacific ports through alliances with western railroads.
CSX moves a broad portfolio of products across the country in a way that minimizes the effect on the
environment, takes traffic off an already congested highway system, and minimizes fuel consumption and
transportation costs.183
2,800 customers. G&Ws eight North American regions serve 41 U.S. states and four Canadian provinces and
include 115 short line and regional freight railroads with more than 13,000 track-miles. G&Ws Australia Region
provides rail freight services in New South Wales, including in the Hunter Valley coal supply chain, and in the
Northern Territory and South Australia, including operating the 1,400-mile Tarcoola-to-Darwin rail line. The
Australia Region is 51% owned by G&W and 49% owned by a consortium of funds and clients managed by
Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets. G&Ws U.K./Europe Region is led by Freightliner, the U.K.s largest
rail maritime intermodal operator and second-largest rail freight company. Operations also include heavy-haul in
Poland and Germany and cross-border intermodal services connecting Northern European seaports with key
industrial regions throughout the continent. G&W subsidiaries provide rail service at more than 40 major ports in
North America, Australia and Europe and perform contract coal loading and railcar switching for industrial
customers.184
CompaniesNotIncludedintheRailroadMarketSegment
American Railcar Industries, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
American Railcar Industries, Inc. designs and manufactures hopper (used to transport dry bulk products) and
tank railcars. The companys operations are divided into three segments: Manufacturing (accounted for 79% of
2015 total revenues); Railcar leasing (13%); and Railcar Services (8%). At 12/31/15, its backlog exceeded 7,081
railcars of which 80% are for direct sale and 70% are scheduled for delivery in 2016. It has more than 2,407
employees. Officers/directors own 60.8% of the common stock; Dimensional Fund Advisors, 7.1% (4/16 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
ARI [American Railcar Industries] is a leading North American designer and manufacturer of hopper and tank
railcars. ARI provides its railcar customers with integrated solutions through a comprehensive set of high quality
products and related services. ARI manufactures and sells railcars, custom designed railcar parts, and other
industrial products. ARI and its subsidiaries also lease railcars manufactured by the company to certain markets.
In addition, ARI provides railcar services through its various repair facilities, including mini-shops and mobile
units, offering a range of services from full to light repair. We partner in two separate and distinct joint ventures:
Axis, LLC, and Ohio Castings Company, LLC.188
Why was the company not included?
This company designs and manufactures railcars.
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
Company Summary from Value Line:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is a holding company owning subsidiaries engaged in property and casualty insurance
on a direct and reinsurance basis through GEICO, General Re and Berkshire Reinsurance. Other business
activities include electric utilities, railroads, flight training services, candy manufacturing, ice cream, building
products, newspapers, retailing, fine jewelry, etc. Also, fractional ownership programs for general aviation
(NetJets), energy (Mid-American Energy). Has approximately 361,270 employees. Officers & directors control
23.4% of voting power (3/16 proxy).
Additional Company Information from Website:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (Berkshire, Company or Registrant) is a holding company owning subsidiaries
engaged in a number of diverse business activities. The most important of these are insurance businesses
conducted on both a primary basis and a reinsurance basis, a freight rail transportation business and a group of
utility and energy generation and distribution businesses. Berkshire also owns and operates a large number of
other businesses engaged in a variety of activities, as identified herein. Berkshire is domiciled in the state of
Delaware, and its corporate headquarters are located in Omaha, Nebraska. Berkshires operating businesses are
managed on an unusually decentralized basis. There are essentially no centralized or integrated business
functions (such as sales, marketing, purchasing, legal or human resources) and there is minimal involvement by
Berkshires corporate headquarters in the day-to-day business activities of the operating businesses. Berkshires
corporate office senior management participates in and is ultimately responsible for significant capital allocation
decisions, investment activities and the selection of the Chief Executive to head each of the operating businesses.
It also is responsible for establishing and monitoring Berkshires corporate governance practices, including, but
not limited to, communicating the appropriate tone at the top messages to its employees and associates,
monitoring governance efforts, including those at the operating businesses, and participating in the resolution of
governance-related issues as needed. Berkshire and its consolidated subsidiaries employed approximately
331,000 people world-wide at the end of 2015. Berkshires corporate headquarters has 25 employees.189
Why was the company not included?
We reviewed Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. because the company is the parent of BNSF Railway, which operates in
Minnesota. However, BNSF Railway is not the majority business segment of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
GATX Corporation
Company Summary from Value Line:
GATX Corp. specializes in tank car, freight car, and locomotive leasing. The company owns or has an interest in
154,096 railcars, and manages 2,143 railcars for third-party owners. Specialty unit finances marine and industrial
equipment. American Steamship unit operates a fleet of vessels on the Great Lakes, providing waterborne
transportation of dry bulk commodities. Invests in joint ventures that complement existing businesses. Has about
2,200 employees. Off. & dir. own 2.9% of common; State Farm, 15.6%; GAMCO, 12.1%; Wellington, 10.1%;
Dimensional Fund Advisors, 9.1%; BlackRock, 7.1% (3/16 Proxy).
YieldCapitalizationRatesforElectric
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
YieldRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 7.13% 4.79% 8.44% 36.00% 64.00% 7.13%
FC
CaliforniaStateBoardofEqualization 7.71%9.82% 4.40%4.80% 10.73%14.06% 43%47% 52%57% N/A SeeComment(1)
ColoradoDepartmentofRevenue 7.55% 4.44% 9.23% 35.00% 65.00% 7.55%
IdahoStateTaxCommission 7.54%FC 4.59% 8.89% 36.00% 64.00% 7.34%
KansasDepartmentofRevenue 8.40%FC 4.79% 10.00% 35.00% 65.00% 8.18%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 7.75% 4.50% 9.50% 36.00% 64.00% 7.70%
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 5.40%AT 2.60%AT 7.20% 40.00% 60.00% 5.36%
OklahomaTaxCommission 7.90% 4.68% 9.90% 38.29% 61.71% 7.90%
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 6.40%,6.80%AT 2.85%AT 8.80%9.50% 40.00% 60.00% 6.42%,6.84% SeeComment(2)
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 7.10%7.50% 4.60% 8.80%9.50% 40.00% 60.00% 7.12%,7.54%
SouthDakotaDepartmentofRevenue 8.71%FC 4.83%FC 10.80%FC 35.00% 65.00% 8.71%
UtahStateTaxCommission N/A 4.79% 8.43% 35.00% 65.00% 7.16% SeeComment(3)
WashingtonDepartmentofRevenueAT 6.51%AT 2.92%AT 8.90% 40.00% 60.00% 6.51%
WyomingDepartmentofRevenue 8.30% 4.97% 10.50% 40.00% 60.00% 8.29% SeeComment(4)
XcelEnergy 8.30%FC 4.50% 9.90% 36.00% 64.00% 7.96%
DamodaranWACCAT 3.47%AT 1.83%AT 4.59% 40.61% 59.39% 3.47% SeeComment(5)
DirectCapitalizationRatesforElectric
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
DirectRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 5.20% 4.79% 5.43% 36.00% 64.00% 5.20%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 5.00% 4.57% 5.24% 36.00% 64.00% 5.00%
MontanaDepartmentofRevenue 5.30% 4.95% 5.50% 40.00% 60.00% 5.28% SeeComment(6)
MontanaDepartmentofRevenue 9.00% 4.95% 11.60% 40.00% 60.00% 8.94% SeeComment(7)
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 4.60%AT 3.07%AT 5.50% 40.00% 60.00% 4.53% SeeComment(6)
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 8.20%AT 3.07%AT 11.60% 40.00% 60.00% 8.19% SeeComment(7)
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 4.10%AT 2.79%AT 4.90% 40.00% 60.00% 4.06%
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 4.70% 4.50% 4.90% 40.00% 60.00% 4.74%
AT
=AfterTaxFC=FlotationCostComponent
YieldCapitalizationRatesforGasDistribution
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
YieldRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 6.81% 4.53% 7.61% 26.00% 74.00% 6.81%
FC
CaliforniaStateBoardofEqualization 7.62%11.19% 4.40%6.11% 10.52%14.58% 40%46% 54%60% N/A SeeComment(1)
ColoradoDepartmentofRevenue 8.24% 4.60% 9.52% 26.00% 74.00% 8.24%
IdahoStateTaxCommission 6.90% 4.04% 7.81% 24.00% 76.00% 6.91%
KansasDepartmentofRevenue 9.47%FC 4.79% 11.25% 32.00% 68.00% 9.18%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 11.25% 8.00% 13.00% 35.00% 65.00% 11.25% SeeComment(2)
OklahomaTaxCommission 8.08% 4.68% 9.80% 33.65% 66.35% 8.08%
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 6.40%AT 2.79%AT 8.00% 30.00% 70.00% 6.44%
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 7.00% 4.50% 8.00% 30.00% 70.00% 6.95%
SouthDakotaDepartmentofRevenue 9.26%FC 4.83% FC 10.74%FC 25.00% 75.00% 9.26%
UtahStateTaxCommission N/A 4.79% 7.80% 35.00% 65.00% 6.75% SeeComment(3)
WashingtonDepartmentofRevenueAT 6.42%AT 2.73%AT 8.00% 30.00% 70.00% 6.42%
WyomingDepartmentofRevenue 9.90% 4.55% 11.78% 26.00% 74.00% 9.90%
DamodaranWACCAT 3.47%AT 1.83%AT 4.59% 40.61% 59.39% 3.47% SeeComment(4)
DirectCapitalizationRatesforGasDistribution
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
DirectRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 4.70% 4.53% 4.76% 26.00% 74.00% 4.70%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 3.00% 4.27% 2.38% 35.00% 65.00% 3.04%
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 4.00%AT 2.65%AT 4.60% 30.00% 70.00% 4.02%
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 4.50% 4.28% 4.60% 30.00% 70.00% 4.50%
AT
=AfterTaxFC=FlotationCostComponent
Comments
(1)Californiacalculatesarangeofcapratesdeterminedbyaspecificcompany'sbondratingwithineachindustryIncludebothelectricandgasinguidelinecompanyselection
(2)GuidelinecompaniesusedareValueLine's"NaturalGas(Diversified)"companies
(3)AnestimatedaverageCostofDebtisimpliedfromtheMarketValueofDebt(PublicUtilityBaa)usedincapitalstructuretable
(4)Ratesselectedfromindustryname"Utility(General)"
YieldCapitalizationRatesforGasTransmission Pipeline
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
YieldRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 8.96% 4.85% 11.59% 39.00% 61.00% 8.96%
CaliforniaStateBoardofEqualization 10.37%FC 4.77% 12.24% 25.00% 75.00% 10.37% SeeComment(1)
ColoradoDepartmentofRevenue 11.23% 5.56% 14.71% 38.00% 62.00% 11.23%
IdahoStateTaxCommission 10.30% 5.50% 13.00% 36.00% 64.00% 10.30%
KansasDepartmentofRevenue 10.79%FC 4.79% 13.95% 38.00% 62.00% 10.47%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 11.00% 6.25% 13.00% 28.00% 72.00% 11.11% SeeComment(2)
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 7.90%AT 3.04%AT 11.00% 40.00% 60.00% 7.82%
OklahomaTaxCommission 10.53% 4.75% 12.50% 25.36% 74.64% 10.53%
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 8.90%,11.00%AT 2.79%AT 13%,16.42% 40.00% 60.00% 8.92%,10.97% SeeComment(3)
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 9.60%,11.70% 4.50% 13%,16.42% 40.00% 60.00% 9.60%,11.65%
SouthDakotaDepartmentofRevenue 11.39%FC 6.64%FC 13.94%FC 35.00% 65.00% 11.39%
UtahStateTaxCommission N/A 4.83% 11.81% 45.00% 55.00% 8.67% SeeComment(4)
WashingtonDepartmentofRevenueAT 8.59%AT 3.47%AT 12.00% 40.00% 60.00% 8.59% SeeComment(5)
WyomingDepartmentofRevenue 13.00% 5.89% 17.57% 39.00% 61.00% 13.01%
TegardenCapRateStudy 10.70% 5.63% 12.90% 30.00% 70.00% 10.72%
DamodaranWACCAT 6.19%AT 2.22%AT 9.25% 43.52% 56.48% 6.19% SeeComment(6)
DirectCapitalizationRatesforGasTransmission Pipeline
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
DirectRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 7.08% 4.79% 8.55% 39.00% 61.00% 7.08%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 6.75% 4.58% 7.69% 28.00% 72.00% 6.82%
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 4.40%AT 3.41%AT 5.00% 40.00% 60.00% 4.36% SeeComment(7)
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 7.20%AT 3.41%AT 9.70% 40.00% 60.00% 7.18% SeeComment(8)
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 3.60% AT 3.08%AT 4.00% 40.00% 60.00% 3.63% SeeComment(9)
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 4.40% 4.96% 4.00% 40.00% 60.00% 4.38% SeeComment(9)
AT
=AfterTaxFC=FlotationCostComponent
YieldCapitalizationRatesforFluid TansportationPipeline
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
YieldRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 10.08% 5.79% 12.49% 36.00% 64.00% 10.08%
CaliforniaStateBoardofEqualization 10.04%11.39%FC 4.80%5.81% 13.54%15.10% 40.00% 60.00% N/A SeeComment(1)
ColoradoDepartmentofRevenue 11.17% 5.27% 14.49% 36.00% 64.00% 11.17%
IdahoStateTaxCommission 10.34% 4.67% 11.93% 30.00% 70.00% 9.75%
KansasDepartmentofRevenue 11.60%FC 4.79% 14.00% 30.00% 70.00% 11.24% SeeComment(2)
MissouriStateTaxCommission 11.00% 6.25% 13.00% 28.00% 72.00% 11.11%
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 7.20%AT 2.91%AT 10.00% 40.00% 60.00% 7.16%
OklahomaTaxCommission 10.25% 4.75% 13.80% 39.24% 60.76% 10.25%
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 8.90%,11.00%AT 2.79%AT 13%,16.42% 40.00% 60.00% 8.92%,10.97% SeeComment(3)
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 9.60%,11.70% 4.50% 13%,16.42% 40.00% 60.00% 9.60%,11.65%
SouthDakotaDepartmentofRevenue 11.19%FC 6.64%FC 13.94%FC 35.00% 65.00% 11.39%
UtahStateTaxCommission N/A 4.83% 12.31% 40.00% 60.00% 9.32% SeeComment(4)
WashingtonDepartmentofRevenueAT 8.59%AT 3.47%AT 12.00% 40.00% 60.00% 8.59% SeeComment(5)
WyomingDepartmentofRevenue 13.00% 5.89% 17.57% 39.00% 61.00% 13.01%
Duff&PhelpsPipelineIndustry 11.15%FC 5.40% 13.35% 31.00% 69.00% 10.89%
EnterpriseProductsPartners 12.40%12.60%FC 5.45% 15.20%15.50% 34.00% 66.00% N/A SeeComment(6)
DamodaranWACCAT 6.19% AT
2.22%AT 9.25% 43.52% 56.48% 6.19% SeeComment(7)
DirectCapitalizationRatesforFluid TransportationPipeline
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
DirectRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 7.20% 5.76% 8.01% 36.00% 64.00% 7.20%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 6.75% 4.58% 7.69% 28.00% 72.00% 6.82%
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 4.60%AT 3.53%AT 5.25% 40.00% 60.00% 4.56% SeeComment(8)
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 6.30%AT 3.53%AT 8.00% 40.00% 60.00% 6.21% SeeComment(9)
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 3.60% AT 3.08%AT 4.00% 40.00% 60.00% 3.63%
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 4.40% 4.96% 4.00% 40.00% 60.00% 4.38%
AT
=AfterTaxFC=FlotationCostComponent
YieldCapitalizationRatesforClass 1 Railroads
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
YieldRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MinnesotaDepartmentofRevenue 9.16% 4.85% 10.31% 21.00% 79.00% 9.16%
CaliforniaStateBoardofEqualization 11.17FC 4.80% 12.76% 20.00% 80.00% 11.17% SeeComment(1)
ColoradoDepartmentofRevenue 11.02% 4.47% 12.65% 20.00% 80.00% 11.01%
IdahoStateTaxCommission 9.63% 4.67% 10.87% 20.00% 80.00% 9.63%
KansasDepartmentofRevenue 12.38%FC 4.85% 13.75% 20.00% 80.00% 11.97%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 11.25% 4.75% 13.00% 21.00% 79.00% 11.27%
MontanaDepartmentofRevenueAT 7.90%AT 2.54%AT 9.80% 27.00% 73.00% 7.84%
OklahomaTaxCommission 11.76% 4.75% 13.20% 17.03% 82.97% 11.76%
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 8.80%AT 4.64%AT 10.15% 25.00% 75.00% 8.77%
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 8.30% 2.88% 10.15% 25.00% 75.00% 8.33%
SouthDakotaDepartmentofRevenue 11.43%FC 4.88%FC 13.06%FC 20.00% 80.00% 11.42%
UtahStateTaxCommission N/A 4.83% 11.08% 20.00% 80.00% 9.83% SeeComment(2)
WashingtonDepartmentofRevenueAT 9.70%AT 2.95%AT 11.75% 23.00% 77.00% 9.73% SeeComment(3)
WyomingDepartmentofRevenue 11.30% 5.66% 12.88% 22.00% 78.00% 11.29%
UnionPacificRailroadCompany 11.41%,11.58%FC 4.72%,4.74% 13.40%,13.62% 23.00% 77.00% 11.41%,11.58% SeeComment(4)
DamodaranWACCAT 5.87% AT
2.10% AT
6.92% 21.84% 78.16% 5.87% SeeComment(5)
DirectCapitalizationRatesforClass 1 Railroads
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
DirectRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 5.38% 4.85% 5.52% 21.00% 79.00% 5.38%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 5.25% 3.26% 5.65% 21.00% 79.00% 5.15%
MontanaDep
Cap Rate Study Comparison - Class 1 Railroads 2017 Capitalization Rate Study
January 2, 2017 Assessment
Comments
(1)Californiacalculatesarangeofcapratesdeterminedbyaspecificcompany'sbondratingwithineachindustry.Theratesusedabovearebasedontwoguidelinecompaniesonly(BNSFRailwayCompany
andUnionPacificRailroadCompany),duetonootherClass1Railroadslistedintheirstudy
(2)AnestimatedaverageCostofDebtisimpliedfromtheMarketValueofDebt(CorporateBaa)usedincapitalstructuretable
(4)Ratesabovereferenceacostofcapitalcalculationwithoutandwithaflotationcostadjustment
(5)Debtrateusedisaftertax
(6)NOIAftertaxDirectCapRate
(7)GrossCashFlowDirectCapRate
YieldCapitalizationRatesforOther Railroads
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
YieldRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MinnesotaDepartmentofRevenue 9.78% 7.21% 10.93% 31.00% 69.00% 9.78%
CaliforniaStateBoardofEqualization 11.4312.00% 6.32%7.34% 14.84%15.10% 40.00% 60.00% N/A SeeComment(1)
FC
KansasDepartmentofRevenue 13.68% 4.85% 16.50% 28.00% 72.00% 13.24%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 11.25% 4.75% 13.75% 27.00% 73.00% 11.32%
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 10.30%AT 2.88%AT 12.00% 25.00% 75.00% 9.72%
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 10.20% 4.64% 12.00% 25.00% 75.00% 10.16%
SouthDakotaDepartmentofRevenue 14.44%FC 4.88%FC 16.84%FC 20.00% 80.00% 14.45%
UtahStateTaxCommission N/A 4.83% 11.23% 25.00% 75.00% 9.63% SeeComment(2)
DirectCapitalizationRatesforOther Railroads
Capital Capital
Selected Costof Costof Composite
Author Structure Structure Comments
DirectRate Debt Equity Rate
(Debt) (Equity)
MNDepartmentofRevenue 6.00% 7.21% 5.46% 31.00% 69.00% 6.00%
MissouriStateTaxCommission 6.00% 3.10% 7.14% 27.00% 73.00% 6.05%
OregonDepartmentofRevenueAT 6.10%AT 2.98%AT 7.10% 25.00% 75.00% 6.07%
OregonDepartmentofRevenue 6.50% 4.80% 7.10% 25.00% 75.00% 6.53%
AT
=AfterTaxFC=FlotationCostComponent
Comments
(2)