Aerothermodynamic and Stability Analyses of A Deployable Re-Entry Capsule
Aerothermodynamic and Stability Analyses of A Deployable Re-Entry Capsule
Aerothermodynamic and Stability Analyses of A Deployable Re-Entry Capsule
Acta Astronautica
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro
a r t i c l e i n f o abstract
Article history: Recent research projects, in the field of atmospheric re-entry technology, are focused on
Received 11 April 2013 the design of deployable, umbrella-like Thermal Protection Systems (TPSs). These TPSs are
Received in revised form made of flexible high temperature resistant fabrics, folded at launch and deployed in
25 June 2013
space for de-orbit and re-entry operations. In the present paper two possible spherecone
Accepted 19 July 2013
Available online 26 July 2013
configurations for the TPS have been investigated from an aerodynamic point of view. The
analyzed configurations are characterized by the same reentry mass and maximum
Keywords: diameter, but have different half-cone angles (451 and 601). The analyses involve both the
Atmospheric re-entry evaluation of thermal and aerodynamic loads and the assessment of the capsule long-
Deployable heat shield
itudinal stability. The aerothermodynamic analysis has been performed for the completely
Longitudinal stability
deployed heat shield in transitional and continuum regimes, while the longitudinal stability
Thermal and aerodynamic loads
has been analyzed in free molecular, transitional and continuum regimes, also taking into
consideration the heat shield deployment sequence at high altitudes.
& 2013 IAA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction goals and to offer the possibility to safely recover the payload
and potential data. These are the reasons why novel concepts
In recent years there has been an increasing interest for of deployable aerodynamic decelerators for de-orbit and re-
small space platforms (micro- and nano-satellites), in entry purposes have been proposed by the University of
particular for Earth's environmental protection, prevention Naples, in collaboration with several Italian small, medium
of natural disasters and homeland security. Other applica- and large enterprises [14].
tions include scientific experiments or technology, space These concepts are not completely new in the aero-
exploration, observation of the universe, astrophysics, space community, that already dedicated previous efforts
biology or physical sciences in microgravity. in the study of inflatable or deployable systems for atmo-
Reducing size, mass and power implies a significant spheric re-entry [59]. This kind of capsules, in fact, can be
reduction of costs and of development time, increasing easily accommodated in launch vehicles in folded config-
accessibility to space and sustaining frequent launches. uration and, when deployed, exhibit a low ballistic coeffi-
Unfortunately this seems to be in contrast with the increasing cient (i.e. the ratio between the capsule mass and its
problem of space debris. In addition, as a consequence of the surface, times the drag coefficient). A lower ballistic
miniaturization, these systems require more sophisticated coefficient implies a larger deceleration in the upper part
solutions to achieve ambitious scientific and technological of the Earth atmosphere, offering as advantage the reduc-
tion of the aero-thermal peak loads and, consequently, a
much higher reliability of the re-entry phase.
n
Correspondence to: Department of Industrial Engineering (DII), Examples of inflatable systems proposed and already
University of Naples Federico II, P.le V. Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy.
tested are the Inflatable Re-entry and Descent Technology
Tel.: +39 0817682358; fax: +39 0817682351.
E-mail addresses: [email protected], (IRDT) [5] and the Inflatable Re-entry Vehicle Experiment
[email protected] (V. Carandente). (IRVE) [6]. An inflatable Nanosat De-orbit and Recovery
0094-5765/$ - see front matter & 2013 IAA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.030
292 V. Carandente et al. / Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 291303
System has been specifically designed for CubeSat pay- nose is always aligned with the free stream. For the two
loads by Andrews Space [7]. analyzed configurations, the longitudinal stability is also
Beside those, different concepts for re-entry systems investigated considering three intermediate steps during
based on mechanically deployable heat-shields exist. In the TPS deployment sequence.
1990 a deployable capsule was developed using an The computations in rarefied flow regimes, i.e. at
umbrella-like heat-shield, made of silicon fabrics and altitudes higher than 100 km, have been performed by
called parashield [8]. A similar satellite called Bremsat means of the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC)
was studied in 1996 at the University of Bremen [9]. method. In continuum flow regime, i.e. at altitudes below
The solutions considered in the present work consist of 60 km, computational results have been obtained by Com-
a hemispherical rigid nose-cap and a conical deployable putational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). At intermediate altitudes
umbrella-like TPS made of flexible high temperature computations have been performed by both DSMC and CFD
resistant fabrics. In the mission scenario, the de-orbit and thus the comparison between the two methods has
maneuver can be accomplished taking advantage from the been also reported.
aero-brake deployment (i.e. without propulsion systems) The work is organized as follows. In Section 2 the
and, if required, the re-entry path can be controlled by vehicle configurations under investigations are introduced
means of the variable aerodynamic drag resulting from the and described. The computing methods and their valida-
variable frontal area (i.e. the variable ballistic parameter), in tion are reported in Section 3. Section 4 deals with the
order to correctly target the system in the selected landing DSMC aerodynamic analysis of the different capsule con-
area [2]. Two possible architectural configurations for the figurations encountered during the TPS deployment in the
spherecone capsule have been considered. They mainly range of altitudes between 100 and 150 km. The atmo-
differ in the half-cone angle (451 and 601) and for the spheric re-entry trajectories are presented in Section 5.
deployment mechanism. The two configurations will be The aerothermodynamic analyses performed in transi-
here labeled as TPS-45 and TPS-60, respectively. tional and continuum regimes, for significant flight condi-
The work is intended to assess the thermal and aero- tions selected along the re-entry trajectories, are reported
dynamic loads in the most severe conditions along the in Section 6. The main conclusions are summarized in
capsule re-entry path and its longitudinal stability in free Section 7.
molecular, transitional and continuum regimes. The study
of the longitudinal stability, in particular, is fundamental to 2. System conguration
verify that the satellite does not assume a wrong attitude
during re-entry, which could compromise the effective- The capsule consists of a cylindrical structure containing
ness of the TPS. A favorable situation can be achieved if the all the subsystems necessary for the on-orbit mission and for
satellite shows longitudinal stability with respect to the the re-entry phase, umbrella-like frameworks, off-the-shelf
nominal equilibrium condition around zero angle of attack ceramic fabrics for the conical deployable heat shield and
and instability for the reverse attitude. In this case, the available ceramic materials (e.g. silica, alumina or zirconia)
satellite is aerodynamically self-stabilized and the capsule for the rigid hemispherical nose. The necessary subsystems
V. Carandente et al. / Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 291303 293
Fig. 1. Geometrical characteristics of the capsule configurations (dimensions in mm): (a) TPS-45 and (b) TPS-60.
Fig. 2. Sketch of the deployment process for TPS-45: (a) Step 1, 7.501; (b) Step 2, 18.51; (c) Step 3, 35.01; and (d) Step 4, 45.01.
294 V. Carandente et al. / Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 291303
include parachute, beacon, OBDH, AOCS, IMU, GPS receiver, the longitudinal stability, five plausible locations
batteries and sensors. A total re-entry mass of 15 kg has been (labeled in Fig. 1 with letters from A to E) have been
assumed. As discussed before, half-cone angles () of 451 and considered for the Center of Gravity (CG). Three reference
601 are considered for the TPS. The radius of curvature of points are located along the capsule axis and two of them
the nose for each of the two configurations is such that the along the normal to the axis, according to Fig. 1 and
conical umbrella is tangent to the nose-cap when the Table 1.
deployment process is complete.
Fig. 1 shows the geometrical configurations under
investigation. When the TPS is completely deployed the Table 1
base diameter of the two configurations is 1.08 m, while Center of gravity positions.
the cylindrical structure has a diameter of 30 cm and a
total length of 60 cm. Figs. 2 and 3, respectively, show the Point A Point B Point C Point D Point E
configurations of TPS-45 and TPS-60 at three stages
x [m] 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.30
during the opening phase up to the final configurations. y [m] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.075 0.075
In addition, in the following analyses concerning
Fig. 3. Sketch of the deployment process for TPS-60: (a) Step 1, 16.01; (b) Step 2, 36.01; (c) Step 3, 50.01; and (d) Step 4, 60.01.
V. Carandente et al. / Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 291303 295
Table 2
Quality report for DSMC runs.
Fig. 6. Heat flux profiles along the TPS-45 surface evaluated by CFD for
different mesh finesses.
Table 4
Input data to DS3V and operative parameters.
9 16 4
150 2.08 10 5.20 10 634 4.50 10 0.760 13.4 42.0
100 5.59 10 7 1.19 1019 196 3.20 10 2 0.750 26.3 0.11
Table 5
Ballistic coefficients for TPS-45, h 150 km.
Table 6
Ballistic coefficients for TPS-60, h 150 km.
0.18 for TPS-45 and TPS-60, respectively and a2 equal to 1.0 provides the measure of the capability to aerodynamically
in both cases control the capsule during the de-orbit phase.
As far as the longitudinal stability is concerned, the
KnD1 angle of attack ranged from 01 to 101 for the computation
C D C D;fmf C D;cont a2 1
KnD1 a1 of the stability derivatives (dCMz/d) relative to the nom-
inal equilibrium condition around the zero angle of attack
Tables 5 and 6 report the ballistic parameter (B) for TPS-45 and from 1701 to 1801 for the stability evaluation in the
and TPS-60, respectively, during the deployment phase, reverse attitude. The stability derivative has been numeri-
while Fig. 8 graphically shows its variation, starting from cally approximated by the finite difference in the interval
the folded configuration (Step 0) up to the completely 101.
deployed TPS (Step 4). It is evident that the ballistic The reference system has been assumed in accordance
coefficient is reduced, for both configurations, of about with Fig. 1, being the z-axis such as to form a right-handed
one order of magnitude. The variation of this parameter triad with x and y.
298 V. Carandente et al. / Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 291303
Since in this case there are two stable equilibrium condi- 5. Re-entry trajectories and test conditions
tions, a stabilization technique (e.g. spin, 3-axis) is
preferable. The re-entry trajectories have been computed numeri-
cally integrating the dynamic equations of motion
reported in Eq. (2) by means of Euler's method. The initial
conditions for the re-entry trajectory at h120 km are,
V7550 m/s and 0.51
8
V 2 C D S 2
>
> dt 2 m
>
dV
g sin V
2B g sin
< 2
V d Vr g cos 2
>
>
dt
>
: dh V sin
dt
Table 7
Stability derivatives [1/deg] with respect to the equilibrium condition around zero angle of attack for the two TPSs at h 100 km.
dCMz/d [deg 1] CG A CG B CG C CG D CG E
Table 8
Stability derivatives [1/deg] with respect to the reverse equilibrium condition for the two TPSs at h 100 km.
dCMz/d [deg 1] CG A CG B CG C CG D CG E
Fig. 12. Velocity (a), free stream Knudsen number (b), stagnation point pressure (c) and stagnation point convective heat flux (d) profiles as functions of
altitude.
Table 9
Input data to DS2V and FLUENT.
conditions (h76.4 km for TPS-45 and 79.4 for TPS-60) KnD1 6. Aerothermodynamic analysis of atmospheric re-entry
is in the order of 5 10 3. At these altitudes and for both
TPSs, the flow is in continuum low density regime. Being in All numerical simulations considered fully-catalytic
this case the flow regime borderline between continuum and wall conditions, assuming a constant wall temperature of
transitional, the aerodynamic analyses have been performed 300 K. These assumptions have been made both for DSMC
using both CFD and DSMC codes. Table 9 reports the free and CFD calculations to get estimations for the cold-wall
stream parameters (from the US Standard Atmosphere 1976) convective heat flux.
and some operative test conditions for all the simulations Fig. 13 reports the comparison between CFD and DSMC
carried out. calculations regarding the most significant thermal and
V. Carandente et al. / Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 291303 301
Fig. 13. Convective heat flux profiles along the capsule surface at the maximum q_ 0 condition (a); pressure profiles along the capsule surface at the
maximum p0 condition (b), and skin friction distribution along the capsule surface at the maximum q_ 0 condition (c).
mechanical loads acting on the surfaces of the analyzed Finally, Table 10 confirms that TPS-45 has a higher
capsules. stability with respect to the equilibrium condition around
In particular, Fig. 13(a) shows that the convective heat zero angle of attack than TPS-60, also in continuum regime
flux at the stagnation point for TPS-45, mostly due to the (KnD1 E8 10 5). Stability derivatives with respect to the
smaller radius of curvature, is about 47% higher than the reverse equilibrium condition for the two TPSs are
one computed for TPS-60. reported in Table 11. It can be noticed that the TPS-60 is
Also in Fig. 13(b) the higher pressure values are undesirably more stable than the TPS-45 around the
registered for TPS-45 (the percentage increase between reverse equilibrium condition.
the two configurations is about 58%).
Fig. 13(c) shows the skin friction distribution along the
capsule surface for TPS-45 and TPS-60. In this case DSMC 7. Concluding remarks
results overestimate CFD results, due to the completely
different computational approach. An overall good agree- In the frame of the development of deployable Thermal
ment between CFD and DSMC analyses has been achieved. Protection Systems (TPSs) made of light and cheap fabric,
In Fig. 14 some contour distributions for some signifi- two possible configurations have been analyzed for a
cant flowfield variable have been reported for TPS-45 in recoverable micro/nano satellite.
the maximum stagnation-point heat flux condition. From The stability analysis in hypersonic, highly rarefied
this figure it can be noticed that, as well known, DSMC regime (i.e. at 150 km altitude) demonstrated that the
calculations overestimate the stand-off distance and the TPS configuration characterized by a half-cone angle of 451
shock wave thickness with respect to CFD, resulting in a (TPS-45) is longitudinally stable with respect to the equili-
smoother variation of the flowfield variables along the brium configuration around zero angle of attack and
stagnation line. unstable with respect to the reverse equilibrium attitude.
302 V. Carandente et al. / Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 291303
Fig. 14. Pressure (a), temperature (b) and velocity (c) distributions in the flowfield past TPS-45 configuration at the maximum q_ 0 condition.
Table 10
Stability derivatives [1/deg] with respect to the equilibrium condition around zero angle of attack for the two TPSs at h 50 km.
3 3 3 2
TPS-45 4.5 10 3.3 10 2.1 10 1.0 10 3.7 10 3
TPS-60 2.6 10 3 2.3 10 3 2.0 10 3 1.1 10 2 6.3 10 3
Table 11
Stability derivatives [1/deg] with respect to the reverse equilibrium condition for the two TPSs at h 50 km.
3 3 3 2
TPS-45 1.9 10 1.8 10 1.7 10 1.2 10 8.5 10 3
TPS-60 3.3 10 3 3.3 10 3 3.4 10 3 1.3 10 2 5.9 10 3
[6] M.C. Lindell, S.J. Hughes, M. Dixon, C.E. Wiley, Structural analysis and [16] G.A. Bird, M.A. Gallis, J.R. Torczynski, D.J. Rader, Accuracy and
testing of the Inflatable Re-entry Vehicle Experiment (IRVE), in: efficiency of the sophisticated direct simulation Monte Carlo algo-
Proceedings of the 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, rithm for simulating noncontinuum gas flows, Phys. Fluids 21
Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, May 14th, 2006, (2009).
Newport, RI, AIAA-2006-1803, 2006. [17] M.A. Gallis, J.R. Torczynski, D.J. Rader, G.A. Bird, Convergence
[7] J. Andrews, K. Watry, K. Brown, Nanosat de-orbit and recovery behavior of a New DSMC algorithm, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009)
system to enable new missions, in: Proceedings of the 25th Annual 45324548.
AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, August 811th, 2011, [18] Fluent 6.3 User's Guide, Fluent Inc., Lebanon, USA, 2006.
SSC11-X-3, 2011. [19] D. Paterna, R. Monti, R. Savino, A. Esposito, Experimental and
[8] D.L. Akin, The parashield entry vehicle concept: basic theory and numerical investigation of Martian atmosphere entry, AIAA J.
flight test developments, in: Proceedings of the 4th Annual AIAA/ Spacecr Rockets 39 2 (2001) 227236.
Utah State University Conference on Small Satellites, August 27 [20] R. Savino, M. De Stefano, Fumo, aerothermodynamic study of ultra-
30th, 1990, Logan, UT, 1990. high temperature ceramic winglet for atmospheric test, AIAA J.
[9] M. Wiegand, H.J. Knigsmann, A. Small Re-entry Capsule BREMSAT
Thermophys. Heat Transfer 22 4 (2008) 669676.
2, in: Porceedings of the 10th AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference,
[21] R. Monti, R. Savino, M. De Stefano, Fumo, matching flight conditions
September 1619th, 1996, Logan, UT, 1996.
on sharp leading edges in Plasma wind tunnels, AIAA J. Thermophys.
[10] G.A. Bird, Molecular Gas Dynamics and Direct Simulation Monte
Heat Transfer 21 3 (2007) 660664.
Carlo, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998.
[22] R. Monti, M.De Stefano Fumo, R. Savino, Thermal shielding of a
[11] C. Shen, Rarefied Gas Dynamic: Fundamentals, Simulations and
reentry vehicle by ultra high temperature ceramic materials, AIAA J.
Micro Flows, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005.
Thermophys. Heat Transfer 20 3 (2005) 500506.
[12] G.A. Bird, Visual DSMC program for two-dimensional flows, The
DS2V Program User's Guide Version 4.5. [23] J.N. Moss, Rarefied Flows of Planetary Entry Capsules, Secial course
[13] G.A. Bird, Visual DSMC program for three-dimensional flows, The on Capsule Aerothermodynamics, May 1995, Rhode-Saint-Gense,
DS3V Program User's Guide Version 2.5. Belgium, AGARD-R-808, 1995, pp. 95129.
[14] R.N. Gupta, J.M. Yos, R.A. Thompson, A Review of Reaction Rates and [24] A. Schettino, R. Votta, P. Roncioni, M. Di Clemente, M. Gerritsma, C.
Thermodynamic Transport Properties for an 11-Species Air Model Chiarelli, D. Ferrarella, Aerodynamic and Aerothermodynamic Data
for Chemical and Thermal Non-Equilibrium Calculations to 30,000 K, Base of EXPERT Capsule, West-East High Speed Flow Field Con-
NASA TM 101528, February 1989. ference, November 1922nd, 2007, Moscow, Russia, 2007.
[15] G.A. Bird, Sophisticated Versus Simple DSMC, in: M. Ivanov, [25] M.W. Tauber, A Review of High Speed, Convective, Heat Transfer
A. Rebrov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium Computation Methods, NASA TP 2914, 1989.
on Rarefied Gas Dynamics, 354, Saint Petersburg, Russia, July 21st
28th 2006, p. 349.