International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 04, April-2015

Design and Analysis of Manually Operated Floor

Cleaning Machine
M. Ranjit Kumar (1) N. Kapilan (2)
1 2
M. Tech Student, Professor
Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering,
Nagarjuna College of Engineering and Technology, Nagarjuna College of Engineering and Technology,
Bangalore, India. Bangalore, India.

Abstract The conventional floor cleaning machines is most Liu et al [1] carried out a technical analysis of residential
widely used in airport platforms, railway platforms, hospitals, floor cleaning robots based on US granted patents. They
bus stands, malls and in many other commercial places. These observed that the macroscopic analysis of patents and patent
devices need an electrical energy for its operation and not user bibliometrics or patent maps, is useful tools to make an
friendly. In India, especially in summer, there is power crisis
overview for designated technical topics and they observed
and most of the floor cleaning machine is not used effectively
due to this problem, particularly in bus stands. Hence it is a that the Samsung is the top one patentee in cleaning robot
need to develop low cost, user friendly floor cleaning machine. after macroscopic of view. Imaekhai Lawrence et al [2]
In this project, an effort has been made to develop a manually evaluation has shown how the use of multiple assessment
operated floor cleaning machine so that it can be an alternative techniques can provide a comprehensive appraisal of the
for conventional floor cleaning machines. In this work, modeling design, usability and musculoskeletal loading upon the
and analysis of the floor cleaning machine was done using operator. They suggested that the trials with a larger number
suitable commercially available software. The conventionally of subjects would certainly strengthen the conclusions.
used materials were considered for the components of floor Abhishek Chakra borty et al [3] reported that the most
cleaning machine. From the finite element analysis, we observe
significant cause of road dust to the total suspended
that the stress level in the manually operated floor cleaning
machine is within the safe limit. particulate burden is vehicle traveling on paved and unpaved'
surfaces. Consequently data directly relating dust to road
Keywords: Floor Cleaning Machine, Modeling, Analysis, and accidents are rare, but in a study if dust is the cause of 10% of
Stress. these accidents casualties then the cost could amount to as
much as 0.02% of GDP in some developing countries and
I. INTRODUCTION total about $800 million annually.
Effective cleaning and sanitizing helps and protect the In recent years, conventional floor cleaning machines are
health of the human beings directly and indirectly. Also, most widely used in airports, railway stations, malls,
cleaning and sanitizing prevents the pest infestations by hospitals and in many commercial places, as cleaning is one
reducing residues that can attract and support bees, pests etc. of the important parameter for the sanitation and government
It also improves the shelf life of the floor, walls etc due to regulations. For maintaining such places, cleaning the floor is
regular cleaning and maintenance. In recent years, most of the major task which is necessary. There are conventional
the people prefer to use trains or buses for commuting and floor cleaning machines available to perform floor cleaning
hence these places are littered with biscuits covers, cold drink operations in above said places. Generally a conventional
bottles etc. Hence, it is necessary to clean the bus stands and floor cleaning machines requires electrical energy for its
railways stations at regular interval. operation. In India, especially in summer there is power
There is no one single cleaning method that is suitable crisis, in majority of places. Hence cleaning the floor using
the conventional floor cleaning machines is difficult without
for all locations and occasions and effective cleaning
electricity. In this project an effort has been made to develop
depends upon type of cleaning device, cleaning technique
a manually operated floor cleaning machine so that it can be
and also the equipment should be user friendly. Cleaning an alternative for conventional floor cleaning machines
work can be physically demanding and a need has been
during power crisis.
identified to developed methods for systematic ergonomics
A manually operated floor cleaning is developed with
evaluation of new products. In recent years, floor cleaning
major list of objectives, one; to achieve simultaneous dry and
robots are getting more popular for busy and aging
wet cleaning in a single run, secondly to make the machine
populations due to lack of workers. However in India, cost effective and thirdly to reduce the maintenance cost of
unemployment is more and hence there is a need to the manually operated floor cleaning machine as far as
develop less labour oriented cleaning machine. Hence, the possible.
present work is aimed to design, development and evaluation In recent years, finite element method is most widely used
of a manually operated floor cleaning machine. to analyze the mechanical component design [4-7] and hence
we have used it in the present work.

IJERTV4IS040912 www.ijert.org 828

(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
 International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 04, April-2015

II. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY 1.3 Material properties

In this work, three dimensional (3-D) modeling and The properties of the materials used for this work is
analyses was carried out using ANSYS software. The Ansys shown in the Table. 1. We have selected mild steel and
tool was used to find the deflection and stresses on frame and aluminum alloy for this work as these materials are cheap and
beam (stick) for dry mopping and wet mopping respectively. commonly used.
The model was checked for the effects of self-weight (dead Table 1 Material Properties
Material Yield strength Allowable stress
load) and for the combination of dead load and live load. MS IS 2062 Gr.B 250 N/mm2 165 N/mm2
The maximum deflection and stresses were checked, and Al alloy IS 63401 135 N/mm2 90.45N/mm2
maintained within the allowable limits for the material of
construction and span/deflection ratios. 1.4 Meshed 3D model of floor cleaning machine
For manual operation, pedal operated body is selected as The 3D model was developed and then it was meshed
the rider machine, to which dry cleaner (sweeper) attachment using the Ansys tool. Finite element model is made using
is made to the front wheel of the body. A frame is constructed beam elements (Beam 188), shell element (shell 63) and mass
for dry cleaning purpose, one side i.e. front side of the frame element (mass 21) & MPC 184 element (Multi point
is made of MS shaft, to which brushes are winded and the constraints 184). Figure 2 shows the model of the floor
shaft rotates by driven mechanism thereby pushing the dust cleaning machine.
into the dust chamber attached to the frame. For wet cleaning,
wet mops are attached at the rear end of the body, which
operates by sliding mechanism on the floor when the body
moves, disinfectant liquid is spread just before the mops from
a plastic tank during wet cleaning operation. This floor
cleaning machine is specifically designed to clean the floors
which are plane and smooth, such as tiles, mosaic and
cemented smooth surfaces.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

1.1 General Assembly
A concept of low-cost user friendly floor cleaning was
developed and 3-D was developed using ANSYS tool and is
shown in Figure 1.
Figure 2: Load Case 1 (Boundary condition applied to the model)

1.5 FE Analysis on model for different loads conditions

(1) For Load Case 1
Dead load is the self weight of the structure which is
acting on it. Load Case 1 is the dead load applied on the
machine. Figure 3 shows the dead load acting on the model at
the specified points. The required boundary conditions are
applied on the model and then the model was checked for
maximum deflections and maximum stresses using the
software.

Figure 1 Three Dimensional Model

1.2 Assumptions made for FEA model

The following assumptions are made in the finite element
analysis (FEA)
1) Material is assumed to be homogeneous, isotropic
and obeys Hookes law
2) It is assumed that all material are ductile in nature
and Von-Mises stress theory is used for comparing
induced stress to allowable stress values.
3) We are considering 25% extra for dead loads to take
care of fasteners, welds which are not modeled
Figure 3: Load Case 1 (Boundary condition applied to the model)
4) Only structural parts are considered for modeling.
Other components are modeled as lumped masses at
their cg locations or forces at their acting points.
5) The structure beams, which are bolted, are
considered as fixed beams.

IJERTV4IS040912 www.ijert.org 829

(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
 International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 04, April-2015

(a) Maximum Deflection for Load Case 1 (2) For Load Case 2
Load Case 2 is the total load acting on the model
which includes dead load and live load. Dead load is self
weight of the structure and Live load is the weight of the
person riding the structure. Figure 6 shows the total load
acting on the model at the specified points. The required
boundary conditions are applied on the model and the model
was checked for maximum deflections and maximum stresses
using the software.

Figure 4: Load Case 1 (Maximum deflection)

The figure 4 shows the maximum and minimum

deflection of the frames and beams under load case 1. From
the deflection contour, maximum deflection and minimum
deflection were evaluated, red color and blue color in the
deflection counter indicates maximum and minimum Figure 6: Load Case 2 (Boundary condition applied to the model)
deflection respectively under load case1. From the deflection
counter, it is found that induced maximum deflection on the (a) Maximum Deflection for Load Case 2
frame and beam are less than the allowable deflection of
material of construction. Also, the value of the deflection was
very small and is negligible.

(b) Maximum von-mises stresses for Load Case 1

Figure 7: Load Case 2 (Maximum deflection)

The figure 7 shows the maximum and minimum

deflection of the frames and beams under load case 2. From
the deflection contour, maximum deflection and minimum
deflection were evaluated, red color and blue color in the
Figure 5: Load Case 1 (Von-Mises stresses) deflection contour indicates maximum and minimum
deflection respectively under load case 2. From the deflection
The figure 5 shows the maximum and minimum counter it is found that induced maximum deflection on the
stresses on the frames and beams under load case 1. From the frame and beam are less than the allowable deflection of
stress contour, Maximum Von-Mises stress and minimum material of construction. Also, the value of the deflection was
Von-Mises stresses were evaluated, Von-Mises stress was very small and is negligible.
chosen for better results. The maximum and minimum
stresses are indicated by the red color and blue color stresses (b) Maximum von-mises stresses for Load Case 2
respectively under load case1. From the stress contour, it is
found that induced maximum Von-Mises stresses on the
frame and beam are less than the allowable Von-Mises stress
of material of construction and hence the design was safe.

Figure 8: Load Case 2 (Von-Mises stresses)

IJERTV4IS040912 www.ijert.org 830

(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
 International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 04, April-2015

The figure 8 shows the maximum and minimum From the above two FEA results induced stress is lesser than
stresses on the frames and beams under load case 2. From the the allowable stress therefore design is safe.
stress contour, Maximum Von-Mises stress and minimum
Von-Mises stresses were evaluated, Von-Mises stress was REFERENCES
chosen for better results. The maximum and minimum [1] Liu, Kuotsan, Wang Chulun, A Technical Analysis of Autonomous
stresses are indicated by red color and blue color stresses Floor Cleaning Robots Based on US Granted Patents, European
respectively under load case 2. From the stress contour, it is International Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 2 No. 7
September 2013, 199-216.
found that induced maximum Von-Mises stresses on the
[2] Imaekhai Lawrence, Evaluating Single Disc Floor Cleaners: An
frame and beam are less than the allowable Von-Mises stress Engineering Evaluation, Innovative Systems Design and Engineering,
of material of construction and hence the design was safe. Vol 3, No 4, 2012, 41-44.
[3] Abhishek Chakraborty, Ashutosh Bansal, Design of Dust Collector for
IV. CONCLUSION Rear Wheel of Four-Wheeler, International Journal of Emerging
Technology and Advanced Engineering, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013,
Manually operated floor cleaning machine is an 199-216
alternative for an automated floor cleaning machines during [4] Jens-Steffen Gutmann, Kristen Culp, Mario E. Munich and Paolo
power crisis. Body is pedal operated to achieve dry and wet Pirjanian. The Social Impact of a Systematic Floor Cleaner. In IEEE
cleaning simultaneously. Its 2D design was carried out in international workshop on advance robotics an its social impacts ,
Unigrahpics tool and by using Ansys tool 3D meshed model Technische University munchen, Germany May 21-23,2012
is developed according to the required dimensions. Using [5] E. Carrera, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Volume 95, March
2014, Pages 111
Ansys tool, 3D model is checked for Deflection, Stresses.
[6] William D. Callister, Materials Science and Engineering, 7th edition,
1) Maximum defection and stresses in the frame (dry 2006, Pages 134- 174K. Elissa, Title of paper if known, unpublished.
cleaner) i.e. for total load (dead load and live load), dead load [7] Peter R.N. Childs, Mechanical Design Engineering Handbook, 2014,
is the self weight of the body and live load is the rider weight Pages 121137
over the body. For total load, induced deflection and induced [8] Michael R. Lindeburg, Mechanical Engineering Manual for sprocket
stress were found and these values are small and negligible. and pinion, 2013, Page 6-60
2) For Maximum total load on the beam (wet mop), [9] H.H. West, Analysis of Structures, John Wiley & Sons, 1984
induced stress and induced deflection were found and these
values were small and negligible.

IJERTV4IS040912 www.ijert.org 831

(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)