Political by Mumani
Political by Mumani
Political by Mumani
Politics and development almost go hard in hand and their interrelationship is two way
directional. They usually affect one another in very significant way. Politics is about policy
formulation, decision making offering direction and ensuring social order. It involves the making
of a common decision for a group of people and that should apply to all members of the group. It
is through Politics that power bestored no one person over a group of people to rule over them.
The ruler is given the mandate to guide people and make decisions on their behalf. Based on
Development is the sustained elevation of an entire society and social system towards a better
and more humane life. According to Todaro, development is a multi dimensional process that
not only involves economic growth but also a re-organization and re-orientation of the entire
system along the social, political and economic spheres. It must encompass more than the
material and financial side of peoples lives. The terms development and underdevelopment do
not just represent the statistical reflection of income levels, conditions of living ,employment
levels and mortality rates ,but also the state of mind,moral value and the respect of a people. The
core values of development should be to ensure respectable life sustenance of the people so that
they can live a worth life. Another objective is to ensure the rise of people self esteem such that
they have the sense of worth and self respect. Liberation should be other objective of
development. This is the freedom or emancipations alienating material conditions of life and
freedom from the social servitude of men to nature,ignorance,other men,misery ,insttitutions and
groups within that system move away from unsasfactory condition of life, to a better life both
Africa development problems are inseparable from its politics.european colonization is one
event in african history that critically affected its development. Since the end of colonialism in
africa, there is no consensus on its legacy. With most African countries still walking on scraches
and many close to collapse, most peple are still not sure whether the problem is due to Africa’s
colonial experience or it’s inherent inadequacies. The apologists of colonialism argue that
whatever may have been the shortcomings of colonial rule, the overall effect was positive for
Africa. They agree that colonial powers exploited africa’s a natural resources but argue that on
the balance,it reduced the economic gap between Africa and the west by laying the seed of
interllectual and material development in Africa. Colonialist claim to have brought civilization
into the darker continent of Africa and in turn transformed the lifes of Africans. these was done
Industrial technology, political and economic organization. They defend there legacy by arguing
that Africa is in apolitical and economic turmoil today because it failed to take advantage of its
inheritance from colonial rule. It was they argue, africa’s inadequencies that made colonialism
necessary and the outcome of post-independence self –rule suggest that the withdrawal of
Critics of colonialism on their part argue that colonial rule left Africans poorer than they were
before. The colonialist not only super exploited African labour and resources but also
undermined the continent capacity to develop. They structured African economics in such away
that they would permanently be dependent on western nations. African economics were
consigned the role of producers of primary products for processing in the west. The west
controlled the international market and discriminated against African nations making them
Colonialism also bred political crisis in Africa. It disrupted pre-colonial political systems that
worked for africanas and imposed alien models. By redrawing of the map of Africa, throwing
diverse people together without the consideration of established borders and ethinic conflicts,
only helped to nature distability in the continent. This also affected development in Africa.
Whateven may have been its pluses and minuses, colonialism was a dictatorial regime that
denied peoples right to self determination. It brought death, pain and humiliation to millions of
its victims. The notion that colonialism was a civilizing mission is a myth as the system was
propelled by Europe’s economic and political selfish interests. To meet their economic and
administrative needs, colonial powers built some infrastructure like the railway to carry export
commoditieas and they educated afew Africans to help them run the colonies. The whole process
was for selfish personal gains. They also caused an identity crisis in Africa that still affect us up
to now. Real development is almost impossible if someone cannot even identify whom she or he
really is.
Indepency for most African state brought high expectations to the people. There was an attitude
of optimism and expectancy in the continent. African nationalist movements enlisted the
sympathy and imagination of scholars who be believed that alien rule had completely failed to
legitimize itself on social ,economic and moral grounds and that substantal and rapid progrees
would occur once colonialism was removed. The post independence politics and progress of
most African states has called for the reassesment of this assumption. The continent has under
gone a series of military coups,recurrent patterns of civil strife, civilize dictatorship seemingly
insoluble economic difficulties. Post independence African states have failed to achieve their
main objective of development due to factor such as neo colonialism, political corruption,
Neo colonialism is a ghost that is haunting many African states. The independence gained from
the withdrawing of colonial power was only partial liberation. Neo colonialism is thus a new
form of imperial rule stage managed by the colonial powers to give the colonialised the illusion
of freedom. Neo colonialism can thus be defined as the survival of the colonial stytem inspite of
the fomal recognition of political independence. The subject countiries are still victims of an
indirect and subtle forms of domination through political, economic, social, military or
technological means. The implication is that western powers still control African nations whose
rulers are either willing puppets or involuntary subordinate of these powers. In this countries the
means of production are owned by foreign corporations who employ various means to transfer
profits out of the country rather than invest them in the local economy. This is evident by large
and numerous multi-national companies in Africa that continue to exploit us. They have
structured the African economy and insured that it’s permanently dependent on Europe. It’s like
we have been doomed to producing primary products for processing in developed countries and
to be dependent on their products. In this way they continue to exploit us by buying our products
at low prices and selling them back to us making huge profits. They have also ensured that
African countries are permanently indebt to them. They purport to help us develop by lending us
money but such aid usually come with strict requirements that are always oppressive to us and
Political corruption has also ensured that we always remain backward in terms of development.
Political corruption is the use of legislated powers by government officials for illegitimate
private gain. This forms of corruption involve but not limited to bribery, extortion, cronyism,
nepotism, patronage, graft and embezzlement. This posses a serious development challenges in
Africa for it undermines democracy and good governance. Many African leaders misuse their
powers by favoring their supporters relatives or personal friends with government resources.
They also use their powers to finish off their critics and opponents. This undermining
development in the country as the allocation of government resource is based on political support
and personal gains. Areas that are not on the right side of the political devide always remain
neglected. They also embezzla public resources for development. As aresult most African
Development always needs a peaceful and secure environment to be realized. Therefore political
stability is very essential to development in a country. The continent as a whole has had some
difficult moment over the past years. This range from military and civilian coups and civial wars.
This could be blamed on weak institutionas of the state, flawed legislative systems and the
constant struggle for political power.The international community geo-security and resource
interest seem to benefit from the status quo in Africa. They have not have been pro the
Africa’s stability through the militarization of conflict for accumulative purposes. Also the
African politicians instability is aconsequence of its leadership problems. The greedy nature and
lack of norms and concern for others by African leaders has also played a big role to its
instability. This phenomena which is a sad reality in Africa has constantly been a hinderance to
development. Civil wars have only helped to turn back the clock of development.
Political ideologies always provide the guiding principle to a nation development. It gives the
path or direction for achieving its goals and objectives. Therefore political ideologies affect
At independence, most African leaders were caught at cross roads on what political ideology to
embrass and how relevant it will be to their countries situation. Also different leaders had various
view on the different leaders different ideologies. It in turn into a war like situation with different
leaders arguing for different political ideologies and trying to undermine the idea of others. They
was no real unity. When unity occured it was just a unity of conviniency. This disunity
undermined the focuss on national development. Also most leaders who took over power at
independence and their successors were mostly concerned only with economic development and
forgetting other aspects of development. This could be the reason why it was hard to move as a
block. And those with a good idea and vision where lone rangers. the country as a whole did not
share in their dream and were abandoned or their dreams and efforts frastrated. A good example
Internal and external political factors have been a huge hinderance to development in Africa.
Whatever Africa has experience in the name of development could best be termed as pseudo
development. It does not capture the full aspects of development. There is a real need for
restructuring of Africa development objectives and the means of attaining them. Most African
states are just living a lie and in need of redemption. Our political setting and context is lost on
2. Harvey Glickman. The criss and challenge of african development; Greenwood press,
London, 1988.