Gibson 1981 PDF
Gibson 1981 PDF
Gibson 1981 PDF
ROBERT
L. SCHIFFMAN
Departmer~tof Civil E~lgitzeeriilg,U~ziversityof Colorado, Borrlder, CO 80309, U.S.A.
AND
KENNETH
W . CARGILL
Waterrvays Experimet~tStation, Vicksbrrrg, M S 39180, U.S.A.
Received March 5 , 1980
Accepted January 7, 1981
The one-dimensional consolidation of a thick clay layer, initially consolidated fully under its
own weight, is considered. Account is taken of the variation of the coefficients of permeability
and compressibility as consolidation proceeds. T o render the theory consistent finite strains are
permitted. Comparisons with conventional theory, in a practical example, show that nonlinear
finite strain theory predicts the progress of consolidation settlement to be substantially swifter
than indicated by conventional theory, although the dissipation of excess pore pressure may be
slower. The consequences of this indicate that conventional consolidation theory has the
potential to seriously underestimate the excess pore water pressure in a soft layer. As a result,
the estimated shear strength would, if an effective stress analysis were used, be overestimated; a
potentially unsafe design could emerge.
On considere la consolidation uni-dimensionnelle d'une couche Cpaisse d'argile, initialement
consolide'e sous son poids propre. On tient compte de la variation des coefficients de perme'abilitC et de compressibilitC en cours de consolidation. De facon B rendre la theorie consistante,
des deformations finies sont autorisees. Les comparaisons avec la theorie conventionelle dans
un exemple pratique montrent que la th6orie en deformation finie non linCaire prCdit une
progression du tassement de consolidation beaucoup plus rapide que ce que donne la thCorie
conventionelle bien que la dissipation des pressions interstitielles puisse Ctre plus lente. Les
consequences de ce rtsultat indiquent que la theorie de consolidation conventionelle peut
6ventuellement sous estimer de facon importante la surpression interstitielle dans une couche
molle. Par consequent la resistance au cisaillement pourrait &tresur estimee dans une analyse
en contraintes effectives, conduisant B un projet potentiellernent non se'curitaire.
[Traduit par la revue]
Introduction
In an earlier paper (Gibson et (11. 1967) the equations governing the progress of one-dimensional
consolidation of a saturated clay layer were derived
on the basis of assumptions rather more general than
those usually adopted. It was shown that if the soil
skeleton is homogeneous1 and free from time-dependent effects (such as the ability to creep at constant
effective stress), then the void ratio e is a privileged
variable in the sense that in terms of it the governing
equations acquire their simplest form. The thin layer,
'The properties of the clay, such as permeability and compressibility, will, of course, alter through the thickness of the
layer and vary with time, owing to the changing distributions
of the void ratio; but this is nonhomogeneity of a derivative
kind. If the soil type, rather than merely its state, varies through
the layer, then the layer will be termed nonhomogeneous.
0008-3674/81/020280-14$01.OO/O
@ 198 1 National Research Council of Canada/Conseil national de recherches du Canada
GIBSON ET AL.
Coordinate Systems
The usual coordinate system used in geotechnical
engineering is the ~ u l e r k nsystem where material
deformation is related to planes fixed in space. Thus,
the excess pore pressure in a consolidating clay layer
is measured at a point which is specifically related to
a fixed physical datum. It should be noted that under
this system the material particles (porous skeleton)
move with respect to the Eulerian coordinate system
as consolidation proceeds. Infinitesimal strain theories of consolidation assume that the thickness of
the compressible layer is constant; the deformation
of the layer, during consolidation, is assumed to be
small compared with its thickness. Using an Eulerian
system a piezometer located at some point in the clay
layer is referenced in space to a fixed datum. The
distance from the datum to the piezometer is always
supposed to remain the same.
Convective and Lagraizgian Coorcliizate Systems
If the deformations are large compared with the
thickness of the compressible layer, the use of an
Eulerian system can be very inconvenient. For example, a piezometer fixed in space but within the
zone of settlement, i.e. near the boundary of the clay
layer, may, after some time, be outside the layer! A
real measuring system is one which convects with the
material particles. The piezometer would always be
surrounded by the same material points and would
measure the pore water pressure of this part of the
skeleton as a function of its momentary position and
time. This type of system is termed a convective
coordinate system.
Consider the one-dimensional consolidation situation shown in Fig. 1 (Gibson et al. 1967). A clay layer
has an initial configuration as shown in Fig. la. This
is the configuration that would exist before consolidation begins. The bottom boundary of the layer can
be assumed to be fixed in space, e.g., a rock boundary
underlaying a soft clay. A thin sample of the clay
layer (AoBoC0Do)has a coordinate position a and has
a = a.
GRAVITY
8,
A,
.
...
...., -..,...
:I
<lo
D,
a
(a)
\'DATUM
PLANE
(:I
-01
(b)
DATUM PLANE
282
Redztced Coordinates
Another set of coordinates, especially useful in the
present context, is based upon the volume of soil
particles lying between the datum plane and the point
being analyzed (Ortenblad 1930; McNabb 1960).
This coordinate z is defined as
[l]
z(a)
La
[g]
aF- l + e aF
aa
1 eo at
e=n/(l-n)
[lo]
a~
--
at
a~ at
a~ aT +-a~ at at at
0.
Coorclinate Transforrnrrtions
For reasons of physical clarity the derivation of the
governing consolidation relationships has been accomplished in the main in terms of the Lagrange
coordinate a, and here t(a, t) enters both as a dependent and an independent variable (Gibson et al.
1967). To insure that .$(a, t) enters only as a dependent variable, transformations between these two
systems must be established.
The relationship between a and $. is expressed
through the concept of the material derivative. Consider the convective coordinates (t, T) and the
Lagrangian coordinates (a, t). In the system described
above,
1501
t = t(a, t)
and
[5b]
283
GIBSON ET AL.
[23] e
"
od
Effective
Stress, o '
a2e ae 1 ae
+
A(p, - pf) - =
[19b] az
az g a t
--
,::I-. r
'
PERV~OUS'" '
m
z=
X l
IMPERVIOUS
[27]
41, t )
( ~ O-Oem)
X exp ( - A[qd
=
+ (ps
pr)l+ Aqll
+ e,
GIBSON ET AL.
[28]
ae
az
s(t) [35]
U(t)
= --
S( )
vf = US
Furthermore
(1
L'
J i[e(z, 01 - e(z,
m ;I]dz
+ pr[S(t) + HI
where the sign is appropriate to the chosen positive
downward coordinate sense and account is taken of
the applied loads and the static pore water pressure.
The pore water pressure y is calculated by use of
the effective stress equation [17].
The pore fluid equilibrium relationship [13], namely
- pf)
[384 N
Normalized
Void Ratio,
E(Z,T)
Normalized
E(Z,T)
Void
Ratio,
E(Z , T )
FIG. 7. Isochrones of normalized void ratio at 50% consolidation and different values of R.
Normalized
Void
Ratio,
E( Z,T)
FIG. 6. Isochrones of normalized void ratio at SOYo consolidation and different values of N.
FIG. 8. Isochrones of normalized void ratio at 50% consolidation and different values of B.
[40]
E ( Z , 0 ) = (1 - B ) exp ( - N Z )
+ B;
O I Z 5 1
E(O,T)=R;
[42]
E(l,T)=(R-B)exp(-N)+
if both boundaries Z
T>O
0 and Z
B; T > O
1 are pervious.
GIBSON ET AL.
Time Factor, T
[44b] S ( T ) =
L1
to h(0) and Z
[49],since
FIG.11. F ( 6 ) as a function of 6 for various values of Q.
TABLE
1. Soil properties-Osaka harbour mud
Plastic limit ( w , )
Liquid limit Ovl)
Water content at the top (rv)
Compression index (C,)
Coefficient of consolidation (c,)
Unit weight of water (pl)
Unit weight of solids (p,)
Total unit weight (p,)
[471
'(P' - pf)a = N Z
I
e,
+ Q[l - e x p ( - N Z ) ]
[49]
289
GIBSON ET AL.
0.4
2.
- 0
c 3
-8 E
8;-
.-
lF!
$2
Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Michigan State University on 05/21/13
For personal use only.
0,3
-f S
-
02
0 U
0.1
0
5.0
Effectlve Stress,
100
a' (tsm)
15.0
FIG.14. Finite strain coefficient of consolidation as a function of the effective stress (1 tsm = 9.8 kPa).
Void Ratio, e
Effectlve Stress,
o' (tsm)
9.8 kPa).
The analysis of this practical example was developed by an explicit numerical procedure (Cargill and
Schiffman 1979).
The Coeficient (A)
The coefficient h is obtained from the relationship
290
1 .O
3.0
2.0
4.0
Void Ratio, e
aq.10 tsm
t-0'
Pressure, u (tsrn)
GIBSON ET AL.
Time
lo3
t (days)
9.8 kPa).
Time, t (days)
FIG.20. Degrees of consolidation for finite strain theory at various imposed loadings, and conventional theory (1 tsm
9.8 kPa).
TABLE
2. Finite strain consolidation parameters
292
Effective
FIG. 21. Comparison of excess pore water pressure isochrones at 50% consolidation between conventional and finite
strain theories for moderate imposed loadings (1 tsm = 9.8
kPa).
GIBSON ET AL.
293
Acknowledgements
We are pleased to acknowledge the cooperation
and advice of Dr. G. L. England of King's College,
London, and Professor M. J. L. Hussey of the Open
University, United Kingdom, at an early stage of
this work. We are further pleased to acknowledge the
partial financial support provided by the National
Science Foundation to the U.S. authors.
Nwmallzed
FIG. 23. Comparison of excess pore water pressure isochrones at 75% consolidation between conventional and finite
strain theories for very light imposed loading ( I tsm = 9.8
kPa).
Conclusions