Life Expectancy Analysis Program: For Electrical Machine Insulation

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 36

Cajetan Pinto, Global R&D Manager Machines Service, March 4, 2009

Life Expectancy Analysis Program


for Electrical Machine Insulation
ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 1

Presentation overview

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 2

Life Cycle Management Approach

Reliability and failure statistics

Planning your Strategy

LEAP Methodology & Use

LEAP Standard

Case Studies

Benefits

Life Cycle Concept

Optimized Maintenance Line

Value to
customer
through
maintenance

Continuous
Upgrading/
Replacement
Maintenance
Overhaul
Aging
Repair
Warranty Period

Upgrade and
Modernization Period
Maintenance Period

Customer Project Lifecycle

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 3

Replacement & Recycle Period

Time

Total cost of operation (TCO)*


TCO includes:
Purchase price
Specifications
Transportation
Storage
Installation
QA
Reliability
Electricity
Repairs
Administration
Inventory
etc

74 %

17.4 %
1%

2.7 %

4.9 %

Installation Purchase Cost of repair Reliability Electricity

* Information provided by MachineMonitor based on survey of 6000 machines


ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 4

Basis of Analysis: Stress & Strength v/s Time

Strength
Stress, strength

Premature Failure

Transients

Stress
Residual Life
Time
ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 5

Failure

Life Expectancy Analysis: Benefits


Strength

Condition assessment and taking


suitable actions at this point.

Adv. 1: No Premature Failure


Transients

Failure
Stress
Residual Life

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 6

Adv. 2: Increase in Life

Reliability
&
Failure Statistics

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 7

Failure statistics: IEEE Survey 1985-1987

Bearing
Winding
11%
5%
3%
6%

37%

Rotor
Shaft/coupling

5%

Brushes/slipring
33%

Detection during Normal operation

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 8

External devices
Not specified

Failure statistics : IEEE Survey 1985-1987

Bearing

4%

10%

Winding

7%

Rotor
Shaft/coupling

8%
2%

Brushes/slipring

8%

61%

Detection during maintenance or test

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 9

External devices
Not specified

Failure Statistics: HV Motors Petrochemical Industry


1999
Distribution of Failures for motors below 2000KW

Bearing
Stator Windings

14.60%

1.20%
Rotor- Bars/rings

2.80%

57.40%
Shaft or coupling

5.60%

External device
18.40%
Not Specified

Distribution of Failures for motors equal and above 2000KW


7.89
IEEE
transactions on
industry
applications .
vol. 35. no. 4.
july/august 1999

7.89 0.00
18.42

60.53
ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 10

5.26

For Machines less than 2000 kW


anti-friction bearings are commonly
used which are more likely to fail

For Machines above 2000 kW


sleeve bearings are often used
which are less likely to fail

Factors affecting Failure rate


Total Failure Rate Vs Age

%wdg Failure Rate

7
6
5
4
%
3
2
1
0

3.5
3
2.5
2
%
1.5
1
0.5
0
0-5

5.1-10

10.1-15

15.1-20

20.1-25

3000-5000

25.1-

Age (Years)

6600-10500 1100013800

Voltage(Volts)

%wdg. Failure Rate

Wdg Failure Rate

1.4
1.2
1
0.8
%
0.6
0.4
0.2
0

2.5
2

Series1

1.5
1

Series1

0.5
0

6
Pole Number

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 11

6000

10

1 or less

More than 1

No of Starts/day

Stator winding failures

Other
14%

Persistent
Overloading
7%
High Ambient
Temperature
8%

Normal
deterioration with
age
18%

Abnormal Moisture
18%

Abnormal Voltage
5%
Abnormal
Frequency
1%

Poor Ventilation/
Cooling
8%
Aggressive
Poor Lubrication
chemicals
5%
7%

High Vibration
9%

FAILURE CONTRIBUTORS
ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 12

Planning your maintenance STRATEGY

Protection

Condition
Monitoring

continuous, on-line,
action taken in real time

on-line, but not


necessarily continuous

to limit the damage or


prevent operation under
abnormal conditions

analysis and action is


subsequent to data
collection
prevents failure by taking
steps with short term
planning for maintenance

MST, ARGUS, DLI, PD,


Telemetry, etc

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 13

Life-time
Estimation

on-line + off-line
analysis and action
subsequent to data
collection
detects life limiting
defects at the incipient
stage, useful in both long
term planning and short
term planning for
maintenance

LEAP

LEAP not just a step ahead


What is LEAP?

LEAP is not just a package of


inspections; it is a systematic
approach to managing Machine
Maintenance
ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 14

Lifetime Expectancy Analysis Program or


LEAP is a unique Maintenance Tool for the
Stator Winding Insulation of Electric
Machines.

LEAP provides information on Machine


winding and expected life, and will optimize
the Machine Maintenance Plans

LEAP developed by ABB Machines Service,


India, is in use for over 12 years, with a
database of measurements and analysis in
excess of 4000 machines worldwide

Measurements are performed by Local or


Global ABB Service centers and data
analyzed at the LEAP Center of Excellence

Level Based Inspections


Opportunities for
Inspections

Inspection Schedule

Basic

When the machine is


operating

Every 5% of the estimated lifetime

Standard

When the machine is


stopped but assembled

Every 10% of the estimated lifetime

Advanced

When the machine is


stopped and partially
dismantled

Every 25% of the estimated lifetime

Premium

When the machine is


stopped and rotor removed

Every 50% of the estimated lifetime

90

Confidence Level

75
60
45
30
15
0

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 15

Basic

Standard

Advanced

Premium

Level Based Inspections


Solution
Levels

Basic

Data collection (on site or remote):


Operational hours, voltage, current, power, slip,

Starts/Stops, Temperature (Winding, Coolant and Ambient),


Duty cycle & loading pattern, Failure and Maintenance
history, Information on power supply, breaker-cable
configuration, etc

Standard

Advanced

Level

Condition Based Inspection and Maintenance


Plan

Condition Assessment of Stator Windings for

Standard Data Collection


Visual Inspection on end windings
Partial Discharge Probe measurements & Dynamic

Condition Assessment of Stator Windings with Standard

Stress analysis of End-windings

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 16

Life Expectancy Analysis 65% Confidence

Basic Data Collection


Polarization Depolarization Current Analysis PDCA
Tan Delta & capacitance Analysis
Non-Linear Insulation Behaviour Analysis
Partial Discharge Analysis

Mechanical Response of Windings

Premium

Deliverables

Packages

Advanced Data Collection


Wedge Tightness Map & Coupling resistance measurements
Visual inspection, including slot areas
Stress analysis of Windings

Contamination, ageing, looseness,


delamination, stress grading system
Life Expectancy Analysis 80% Confidence
Level
Condition Based Inspection and Maintenance
Plan

Package + End-winding assessment


Life Expectancy Analysis 85% Confidence
Level
Condition Based Inspection and Maintenance
Plan

Condition Assessment of Stator Windings with


Advanced Package + slot region assessment
Life Expectancy Analysis 90% Confidence
Level
Condition Based Inspection and Maintenance
Plan

LEAP Methodology
&
Use of LEAP

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 17

LEAP methodology

Collection of Data
Operating data, test measurements and
machine information

Analysis of Data
ABB has developed UNIQUE analytical
tools aimed at life assessment

Calculation of Stresses
Life Expectancy Analysis is performed and
factors and conditions that affect lifetime
are identified

Estimating Life & Condition Based


Maintenance
Lifetime is estimated with different
Confidence levels depending on the LEAP
package
Possible further inspections, maintenance,
replacements or even upgrades are drawn
up

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 18

LEAP
Standard

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 19

LEAP Standard package


P o la r iz a tio n -D e p o la r iz a tio n C u r r e n ts
U PHASE

Pol-Depol Currents (microAmp)

100

DC Measurements

10

Polarization De-Polarization
Current Analysis

0 .1
1

10

100

1000

T im e (s e c )

C h a r g in g

D is c h a r g in g

TAN DELTA MEASUREMENTS

AC Measurements

4.00

3.50

Non Linear Behavior Analysis

Tan and Capacitance Analysis

Partial Discharge Analysis

Tan Delta (%)

3.00

2.50

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50
1

Voltage (kV)

U Phase

V Phase

W Phase

UVW Phase

Remark: DC tests are sensitive to the surface


condition, and AC tests give more information on
the insulation volume

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 20

DC measurements
Polarization-Depolarization Currents
UVW PHASE

Q1, Q2
Q3

Pol-D epol C urrents (m icroA m p)

100

10

0.1

0.01
1

10

100

Time (sec)

Charging

Remark:
Conventional IR
& PI
Measurements
may have
satisfactory
values even
with highly
contaminated
windings

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 21

Discharging

1000

Parameters
Derived
Time constants
T1, T2, T3
Charge storage
: Q1, Q2, Q3
Ageing Factor
Dispersion
Ratio
(1+Q1+Q2+Q3)
Volume
Resistivity

Polarization - De-polarization Current Analysis


Besides

leakage and absorption current, PDCA test gives an idea of


quantity and location of charge storage within the machine

Identifies

contamination even when IR, PI values are acceptable.

Determines

state of the winding insulation, ageing, looseness, etc.

AC measurements
CAPACITANCE (Arbitrary Units)

INSTANTANEOUS CAPACITANCE VARIATIONS


@ 5.8 kV

110

65

20

-25

-70
40

42

44

46

48

50

52

54

56

58

TIME (msecs)
U - PHASE

V - PHASE

W - PHASE

UVW - PHASE

Non Linear Behavior Analysis, Tan and Capacitance Analysis,


Partial Discharge Analysis

Remarks:
Conventional
measurement
interpretation
is generally
based on
trends

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 22

Confirm the results from DC Measurements

Assess the condition of Corona protection shield

Determine the extent of de-lamination or void content in terms of a


percentage of discharging Air Volume to Insulation Volume

Assess condition of the Stress Grading system at slot ends

Trend Ageing effects

60

LEAP
from the Case Book

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 23

Contamination indicated by LEAP

IR >>1000
M
PI >> 2

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 24

Contamination indicated by LEAP

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 25

Slot discharge / wear detected by LEAP

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 26

Surface discharge detected by LEAP

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 27

Case study 1: LEAP Maintenance Planning


11MW 11kV 1500 RPM, Synchronous
Motor (Air Separation problem)
Purpose of Testing: The motor was in
operation for 69,000 hours with no outage. LEAP
Standard carried out to determine the need for L3 or
L4 Maintenance. On-line pd alarm had appeared.

Results - PDCA Test


IR- 2310 Meg ohm
PI- 2.02
Q1(%) 9.63
Q2 (%) 11.30

Key Findings:
LEAP Standard indicated presence
of oil/carbonized contaminants
predominantly on the overhangs

Q3 (%) 44.54
DR 1.65

AgF 60.12

Vol Res 1013.78 Ohm-m

Recommendation:

Open the end covers and clean end windings (L3). No immediate need of
overhaul with rotor removal (L4)

Benefits: Optimized Maintenance Planning


ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 28

Case Study 3: LEAP Maintenance Verification


6034 HP, 6 kV, 502A, 1481rpm

RESULTS - PDCA TEST


Before Overhauling
IR - 2205 Mohm
PI - 4.79
Q1 78.68 %

Q1, Q2

Q2 65.49 %
Q3 128.56 %
Q3

DR 3.73

After Overhauling
IR - 32464 Mohm
PI 5.63
Q1 7.84 %
Q2 8.84 %
Q3 8.86 %
DR 1.25

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 32

LEAP Usage

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 33

LEAP for Maintenance Planning

LEAP for L1, L2, L3, L4 inspection

LEAP for Run/Replace/Retrofit


Decisions

Measurements and Analysis are to be


done at a single occasion (L4) with
additional assessment of other
components besides the stator windings

LEAP for Life Extension/ Upgrade


Decisions

Stress/Strength

Life Improvement

Strength

Developed Stress

Years
Improvement in
life by restoring
strength droop
Improvement in life by
upgrading machine
ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 34

Stress/Strength

Life Improvement

Strength

Developed Stress

Improvement in life by
restoring original stress
developed

LEAP for
Life Extension

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 35

Years
Improvement in life by
reducing stress through
redesign

LEAP How is it different?

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 36

Methodology is not dependent on old records of measurements


performed. Single occasion of measurements will suffice for making
decisions. Parameters are derived from measurements to quantify
problems such as contamination, ageing and looseness.

65-72% of failures are related to Thermal and Ambient reasons which


may not be detected by measurements that rely only on partial
discharges. ABBs measurements and analysis focuses also on
detection non-partial discharge related problems.

Analysis software is UNIQUE and parameters derived from analysis can


be utilized in Life Expectancy Calculations

Sophisticated FEM analysis can be deployed during L3 and L4


maintenance.

Can be related to time and integrated into a Maintenance Plan

Towards a New Dimension

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 37

We change the units !

Machinery status is typically


expressed in vague units
(green, yellow, red)

We change that into a


measurable dimension:
time that can be easily
interpreted by other
computerized systems and
related to scheduling
actions

LEAP - Value for the Customer

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 38

Optimizes Maintenance Planning of


Electrical Machines by moving from
Scheduled Maintenance to Condition
Based Maintenance

Life Extension of machines would lead


to increased earnings capability and
thereby greater return on investment.

Facilitate decision making (short and


long term maintenance planning)

Focus mainly on essential maintenance,


and machines that are vulnerable,
thereby reducing downtime at lower risk
levels

Provides important lifetime inputs for


more realistic estimates of Life Cycle
Costing

ABB Group
October 29, 2009 | Slide 39

You might also like