Spontaneous Mandibular Fracture in A Partially Edentulous Patient: Case Report
Spontaneous Mandibular Fracture in A Partially Edentulous Patient: Case Report
Spontaneous Mandibular Fracture in A Partially Edentulous Patient: Case Report
R A T I Q U E
C L I N I Q U E
S o m m a i r e
Larticle dcrit le cas dun patient de 78 ans prsentant une fracture de la mandibule traite par miniplaque
dostosynthse. la suite du premier traitement, une radiographie panoramique rvle une fracture de la miniplaque, et au suivi, un dvissage partiel de la plaque de substitution. Pour le praticien dentaire, ce cas clinique
souligne limportance de la radiographie panoramique, de lanalyse et de lquilibration occlusales pour le diagnostic de la fracture mandibulaire, lvaluation de la fracture de la miniplaque et le traitement, surtout en labsence de
traumatisme.
Mots cls MeSH : fractures, spontaneous/surgery; mandibular fractures; postoperative complications
J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69(7):42830
Cet article a fait lobjet dune rvision par des pairs.
Case Report
An almost totally edentulous 78-year-old man without a
significant dental history was admitted to hospital with a large,
hard edema in the left lateral mandibular area. Fifteen days
before being admitted to hospital, the patient had consulted
his dentist with pain and swelling of the left mandibular
428
Figure 2: Panoramic radiograph of the patient 3 weeks after fracture reduction shows
miniplate fracture.
Discussion
Although the mandible is membranous
during its embryonic stage, its physical
structure resembles a bent long bone,5 and
Figure 3: Panoramic radiograph of the patient 1 year later confirms good bone healing.
it is subject to biomechanical compression,
bending, torsion and traction.6 This arch of
corticocancellous bone projects downward
new partial lower and upper denture. Histological examination
and forward from the base of the skull and constitutes the
revealed a nonmalignant osteitis lesion.
strongest and most rigid component of the facial skeleton.
Postoperative panoramic radiography demonstrated satisHowever, it is more commonly fractured than the other
factory reduction of the fracture. The patient was advised to
bones of the face, and the teeth or lack thereof may be the
eat a liquid diet for 2 days, followed by a diet of soft food for
most important factor in determining where fractures occur.
6 weeks.
Other factors that can influence fractures are the forces exerted
Temporary paresthesia of the left mandibular area
by the muscles of mastication, the occlusal loading pattern
disappeared progressively. Twenty-one days after the surgery,
and the osseous anatomy. Fractures of the edentulous mandithe patient noticed renewed pain in the same area, and panorable most often occur in elderly people. As the patient ages,
bony strength is reduced. According to Thaller,7 there is no
mic radiography revealed that the titanium miniplate had
Journal de lAssociation dentaire canadienne
429
Rfrences
1. Banks P. Killeys fractures of the mandible. 4th ed. London:
Butterworth-Heineman Wright; 1991. p. 1112.
2. Archer WH. Fractures of the facial bones and their treatment. In:
Archer WH, editors. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphila: WB Saunders; 1975. p. 25960.
3. Iatrou I, Samaras C, Theologie-Lygidakis N. Miniplate osteosynthesis
for fractures of the edentulous mandible: a clinical study 198996.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998; 26(6):4004.
4. Joos V, Meyer U, Tkotz T, Weingart D. Use of mandibular fracture
score to predict the development of complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg
1999; 57(1):25.
5. Maaita J, Alwrikat A. Is the mandibular third molar a risk factor for
mandibular angle fracture? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho Oral Radiol
Endod 2000; 89(2):1436.
6. Gola R, Cheynet F, Carreau JP, Guyot L. [The value of an osteosynthesis arch-plate combination in the application zone in the treatment of
fractures of the body of the mandible.] Intrt de lassociation arc-plaque
dostosynthse en zone utile dans le traitement des fractures du corpus
de la mandibule. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1996; 97(2):7283.
7. Thaller SR. Fractures of the edentulous mandible: a retrospective
review. J Craniofac Surg 1993; 4(2):914.
8. Jammet P, Souyris F, Atlan G, Dupoirieux L. [A comparative study of
2 series of mandibular osteosynthesis using screwed plates.] tude
comparative de deux sries dostosynthses mandibulaires par plaques
visses. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1992; 93(2):769.
9. Peled M, Laufer D, Helman J, Gutman D. Treatment of mandibular
fractures by means of compression osteosynthesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg
1989; 47(6):5669.
10. Souyris F, Lamarche JP, Mirfakhrai A. Treatment of mandibular fractures by intraoral placement of bone plates. J Oral Surg 1980;
38(1):335.
11. Edwards TJ, David DJ, Simpson DA, Abbott AH. The relationship
between fracture severity and complication rate in miniplate osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47(5):3101.
12. Childress SC, Newlands SD. Utilization of panoramic radiographs to
evaluate short-term complications of mandibular fracture repair. Laryngoscope 1999; 109(8):126972.
13. Kawai T, Murakami S, Hiranuma H, Sakuda M. Radiographic changes during bone healing after mandible fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac
Surg 1997; 35(5):3128.
14. Barber HD, Woodbury SC, Silverstein KE, Fonseca RJ. Mandibular
fractures. In: Fonseca RJ, Walker RV, Betts NJ, Barber HD, editors. Oral
and maxillofacial trauma. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1997. p. 473526.