Ines Belkahla The Real Thing Henry James
Ines Belkahla The Real Thing Henry James
Ines Belkahla The Real Thing Henry James
Ines BELKAHLA
idea is illustrated by the affirmation of the artist that they are the real
thing, but always the same thing.
The artist in Jamess story is faced with a complex and strange
situation as he tries to represent The Monarchs. For these sitters prove to
be of a rigid stagnancy that prevents the creativity and the special touch
of the artist. However, with the entering of Mrs Churm and Oronte the
painter finds himself immediately inspired. These characters are in fact
simple and poor subjects from the working class. Unlike The Monarchs,
they provide the painter with the amount of inspiration he needs. At a
certain level of the story, the narrator confesses:Arrange as I would and
take the precautions I would, she always, in my pictures, came out too tall
landing me in the dilemma of having represented a fascinating woman
as seven feet high, which, out of respect perhaps to my own very much
scantier inches, was far from my idea of such a personage.
Therefore, James sets a clear problematization of the notions of
reality and authenticity and their value. This problematization is conveyed
through the dilemma of representation in from which the artist cannot
escape. As soon as the story begins, the painter discovers that he cannot
make new characters out of The Monarchs the way he does with Mrs
Churm. Thus, Jamess painter favors representations over the original
thing they represent.
Consequently one can see clearly the differences of Platos and
Jamess perspectives on reality. While Platos metaphysics focus on the
value of things original state of being, James seems to advocate the
importance of the representation of things. Accordingly, copies which are
seen as defective by Plato are reconsidered by James and given a higher
value. Throughout The Real Thing, the narrator evaluates people
according to their potential to be represented. The aptitude of things to be
metamorphosed on canvas represents their true value according to
Jamess thinking. That is to say, the copy determines the value of the
authentic thing and not the other way round as in Platos theory of forms.
To sum up, Platos theory of forms is par-excellence the first welldeveloped quest for the origin of things. The presumptions related to this
pursuit of reality establish an inflexible approach to seeing the world. This
approach stands for the duality of the physical universe and the thought
universe and how the latter is a defective copy of the former. In contrast
with this line of thought, Henry James establishes through The Real
Thing a simple plot to suggest that representations or copies can have
more considerable value than their originals. Jamess point of view seems
to be rigorously illustrated with the story of the painter who meets with
different situations while portraying people from different social
backgrounds.
Works Cited
cw.routledge.com/.../plato/platotheoryforms.pdf
http://suite101.com/article/american-realism-the-real-thing-byhenry-james-a281950
1 Page numbers are not mentioned for the lack of the hard copy of the work. This
paper should be updated in the most brief delays.