Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    Hagan v. Cooper T Smith, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Hagan sought review of a Benefits Review Board decision affirming an Administrative Law Judge's award and computation of benefits to Hagan under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the Board's decision, finding that it was based on substantial evidence and without reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Hagan v. Cooper T Smith, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    Robert Hagan sought review of a Benefits Review Board decision affirming an Administrative Law Judge's award and computation of benefits to Hagan under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the Board's decision, finding that it was based on substantial evidence and without reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1593

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Robert Hagan sought review of a Benefits Review Board decision affirming an Administrative Law Judge's award and computation of benefits to Hagan under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the Board's decision, finding that it was based on substantial evidence and without reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    20 views2 pages

    Hagan v. Cooper T Smith, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Hagan sought review of a Benefits Review Board decision affirming an Administrative Law Judge's award and computation of benefits to Hagan under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the Board's decision, finding that it was based on substantial evidence and without reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1593

    ROBERT R. HAGAN,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    COOPER/T. SMITH STEVEDORING COMPANY; I.T.O.
    CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS
    COMPENSATION
    PROGRAMS,
    UNITED
    STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
    Respondents.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.


    (01-586)

    Submitted:

    September 27, 2002

    Decided:

    October 22, 2002

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael C. Eisenstein, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner.


    Christopher J. Field, FIELD, WOMACK & KAWCZYNSKI, L.L.C., South
    Amboy, New Jersey; Thomas C. Valkenet, YOUNG & VALKENET, L.L.C.,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondents.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Hagan seeks review of the Benefits Review Boards
    decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judges award
    and computation of benefits pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor
    Workers Compensation Act, 30 U.S.C.A. 901-945 (West 2001 & Supp.
    2002). Our review of the record discloses that the Boards decision
    is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.

    See Hagan v.

    Smith, BRB No. 01-586 (B.R.B. Apr. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like