Legal Aid
Legal Aid
Legal Aid
1 | Page
3. It should also include activities like spreading legal awareness and educating people on their basic
rights with the help of NGOs.
4. Promote more informal paralegal services in places where basic access to justice opportunities and
infrastructures are absent.
5. Promote a pro bono service culture and tradition within the legal profession.
6. Offer comparative models of legal aid to government in reforming the movement.
7. Support the development of demonstration legal aid/public defender offices in cooperation with
governments.
8. Lok Adalats should be promoted in the right direction as they settle the disputes quickly by counseling
and discussions, etc. Its basis is to provide quick justice with the mutual consent of the parties. Their
object is to reduce burden on the Courts so that the problem of laws delay may be solved and people may
get justice within due time. The machinery of the Government engaged in the execution of this movement
in the state must be geared from bottom to top.
International Status
Over seven centuries ago, the beginnings of equal justice under the law were marked by the inscription in
the 40th paragraph of the Magna Carta:
To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay right or justice.
Thus on the green meadows of Runnymede was sown the constitutional seed of legal aid in the modern
world which has travelled to all the continents as part of civilized jurisprudence.[6]
The international concern for human rights found expression, after the First World War in covenants of
the League of Nations and further in the Declaration of Human Rights, the Conventions which followed
specifically incorporated the concept of legal aid.
Legal Aid in India
History
Humanism, which is the source and strength of legality, is writ large in the theme of legal services to the
poor in that part of our planet where backwardness and indigence have struck the hardest blows through
2 | Page
the legal process itself on the lowly and the lost.[7] Pre-British India had practiced constitutional
monarchy and the days of the Hindu and Muslim rulers had witnessed unsophisticated methodology of
dispensing justice to the poor, inexpensively and immediately. In short, justice to the citizens-high and
low-has been an Indian creed of long ago.[8]
After Independence schemes of legal aid was developed under the aegis of Justice P.N. Bhagwati, then of
Bombay High Court and Justice Trevore Harris of Calcutta High Court.[9] The matter of legal aid was
also referred to the Law Commission to make recommendations for making the legal aid program an
effective instrument for rendering social justice. Coming up with recommendation in its XIV report,
under the leadership of leading jurist M.C. Setalvad, the Commission opined that free legal aid is a
service which should be provided by the State to the poor. The State must, while accepting the obligation,
make provision for funds to provide legal aid. The legal community must play a pivotal role in accepting
the responsibility for the administration and working of the legal aid scheme. It owes a moral and social
obligation and therefore the Bar Association should take a step forward in rendering legal aid voluntarily.
These would include representation by lawyers at government expenses to accused persons in criminal
proceedings, in jails, and appeals. The Commission also recommended the substitution in Order XXXIII,
Civil Procedure Code of the word pauper with poor persons. Acting on the recommendations of the
Law Commission, the Government of India in 1960 prepared a national scheme of legal aid providing for
legal aid in all courts including tribunals. It envisaged the establishment of committees at the State,
District and Tehsil level. However due to the inability of States to implement the scheme because of lack
of finances the scheme did not survive.
In 1980, a Committee at the national level was constituted to oversee and supervise legal aid programmes
throughout the country under the Chairmanship of Hon. Mr. Justice P.N. Bhagwati then a Judge of the
Supreme Court of India. This Committee came to be known as CILAS (Committee for Implementing
Legal Aid Schemes) and started monitoring legal aid activities throughout the country. The introduction
of Lok Adalats added a new chapter to the justice dispensation system of this country and succeeded in
providing a supplementary forum to the litigants for conciliatory settlement of their disputes. In 1987
Legal Services Authorities Act was enacted to give a statutory base to legal aid programmes throughout
the country on a uniform pattern. This Act was finally enforced on 9th of November 1995 after certain
amendments were introduced therein by the Amendment Act of 1994.
Constitutional Provisions
The preamble of the Indian constitution aims to secure to the people of India justice socio economic
and political.
3 | Page
Articles 14 and 22(1) also make it obligatory for the State to ensure equality before law and a legal
system which promotes justice on a basis of equal opportunity to all. Legal aid strives to ensure that
constitutional pledge is fulfilled in its letter and spirit and equal justice is made available to the poor,
downtrodden and weaker sections of the society.
Article 38 and 39A of the Indian constitution are notable.
Article 38(1) states- the State shall promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting the
social order including justice and
Article 39A of the Constitution of India provides that State shall secure that the operation of the legal
system promotes justice on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall in particular, provide free legal aid, by
suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are
not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disability.
In Sheela Barse vs. State of Maharashtra , it was held that legal assistance to a poor accused who is
arrested and put in jeopardy of his life or personal liberty is constitutional imperative mandated not only
by article 39-A but also by article 21 and 14 of the constitution. Article 21 clearly says that every person
has an equal right to life and liberty except according to the procedure established by the law.
It was said in the case of Hussainara khatoon vs. State of Bihar, that if any accused is not able to afford
legal services then he has a right to free legal aid at the cost of the state.
Also in Sukhdas vs. Union Territory of Arunachal Pradesh , it was held, in case an accused is not told of
his right and therefore he remains unprecedented by a lawyer, his trial is vitiated by constitutional
infirmity and any conviction as a result of such trial is liable to be set aside. Similarly article 14 also talks
about equality before law.
Sec. 304, Criminal Procedure Code: The Constitutional duty to provide legal aid arises from the time
the accused is produced before the Magistrate for the first time and continues whenever he is produced
for remand.
Order 33, rule 17, CPC :- Suit by or against an indigent person. When a plaint along with petition, that
person is unable to avail the services of an lawyer, then court exempts him from court fees.
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
4 | Page
Section 12 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 prescribes the criteria for giving legal services to
the eligible persons. Section 12 of the Act reads as under:Every person who has to file or defend a case shall be entitled to legal services under this Act if that
person is(a) a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe;
(b) a victim of trafficking in human beings or begar as referred to in Article 23 of the Constitution;
(c) a woman or a child;
(d) a mentally ill or otherwise disabled person;
(e) a person under circumstances of undeserved want such as being a victim of a mass disaster, ethnic
violence, caste atrocity, flood, drought, earthquake or industrial disaster; or
(f) an industrial workman; or
(g) in custody, including custody in a protective home within the meaning of clause (g) of section 2 of the
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (104 of 1956); or in a juvenile home within the meaning of clause
(h) of section 2 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (53 of 1986) or in a psychiatric hospital or psychiatric
nursing home within the meaning of clause (g) of section 2 of the Mental Health Act, 1987 (14 of 1987);
or
(i) in receipt of annual income less than rupees nine thousand or such other higher amount as may be
prescribed by the State Govt., if the case is before a court other than the Supreme Court, and less than
rupees twelve thousand or such other higher amount as may be prescribed by the Central Govt., if the
case is before the Supreme Court.
(Rules have already been amended to enhance this income ceiling).
Legal Services Authorities after examining the eligibility criteria of an applicant and the existence of a
prima facie case in his favour provide him counsel at State expense, pay the required Court Fee in the
matter and bear all incidental expenses in connection with the case. The person to whom legal aid is
5 | Page
provided is not called upon to spend anything on the litigation once it is supported by a Legal Services
Authority.
Hierarchy Of Bodies Created Under The Act
A nationwide network has been envisaged under the Act for providing legal aid and assistance. National
Legal Services Authority is the apex body constituted to lay down policies and principles for making
legal services available under the provisions of the Act and to frame most effective and economical
schemes for legal services. It also disburses funds and grants to State Legal Services Authorities and
NGOs for implementing legal aid schemes and programmes.
In every State a State Legal Services Authority is constituted to give effect to the policies and directions
of the Central Authority (NALSA) and to give legal services to the people and conduct Lok Adalats in the
State. State Legal Services Authority is headed by the Chief Justice of the State High Court who is its
Patron-in-Chief. A serving or retired Judge of the High Court is nominated as its Executive Chairman.
District Legal Services Authority is constituted in every District to implement Legal Aid Programmes and
Schemes in the District. The District Judge of the District is its ex-officio Chairman.
Taluk Legal Services Committees are also constituted for each of the Taluk or Mandal or for group of
Taluk or Mandals to coordinate the activities of legal services in the Taluk and to organise Lok Adalats.
Every Taluk Legal Services Committee is headed by a senior Civil Judge operating within the jurisdiction
of the Committee who is its ex-officio Chairman.
Constitution of the National Legal Services:
The Central Authority shall consist of
a. the Chief Justice of India who shall be the Patron-in-Chief;
b. a serving or retired Judge of the Supreme Court to be nominated by the President, in consultation with
the Chief Justice of India, who shall be the Executive Chairman; and
c. such number of other members, possessing such experience and qualifications, as may be prescribed by
the Central Government, to be nominated by that government in consultation with the Chief Justice of
India.
6 | Page
The Central Government shall in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, appoint a person to be the
Member-Secretary of the Central Authority, possessing such experience and qualifications as may be
prescribed by that Government, to exercise such powers and perform such duties under the Executive
Chairman of the Central Authority as may be prescribed by that Government or as may be assigned to
him by the Executive Chairman of that Authority.
The administrative expenses of the Central Authority, including the salaries, allowances and pensions
payable to the Member-Secretary, officers and other employees of the Central Authority, shall be
defrayed out of the Consolidated Fund of India.
Supreme Court Legal Services Committee:
The Central Authority shall constitute a Committee to be called the Supreme Court Legal Services
Committee for the purpose of exercising such powers and performing such functions as may be
determined by regulations made by the Central Authority.
The Committee shall consist of
a. a sitting judge of the Supreme Court who shall be the Chairman; and
b. such number of other members possessing such experience and qualifications as may be prescribed by
the Central Government to be nominated by the Chief Justice of India.
The Chief Justice of India shall appoint a person to be the Secretary to the Committee, possessing such
experience and qualifications as may be prescribed by the Central Government.
The schemes and measures implemented by the Central Authority:
a. After the constitution of the Central Authority and the establishment of NALSA office towards the
beginning of 1998, following schemes and measures have been envisaged and implemented by the
Central Authority:(a) Establishing Permanent and Continuous Lok Adalats in all the Districts in the country for disposal of
pending matters as well as disputes at pre-litigative stage;
(b) Establishing separate Permanent & Continuous Lok Adalats for Govt. Departments, Statutory
Authorities and Public Sector Undertakings for disposal of pending cases as well as disputes at prelitigative stage;
7 | Page
(c) Accreditation of NGOs for Legal Literacy and Legal Awareness campaign;
(d) Appointment of "Legal Aid Counsel" in all the Courts of Magistrates in the country;
(e) Disposal of cases through Lok Adalats on old pattern;
(f) Publicity to Legal Aid Schemes and programmes to make people aware about legal aid facilities;
(g) Emphasis on competent and quality legal services to the aided persons;
(h) Legal aid facilities in jails;
(i) Setting up of Counseling and Conciliation Centers in all the Districts in the country;
(j) Sensitisation of Judicial Officers in regard to Legal Services Schemes and programmes;
(k) Publication of "Nyaya Deep", the official newsletter of NALSA;
(l) Enhancement of Income Ceiling to Rs.50,000/- p.a. for legal aid before Supreme Court of India and to
Rs.25,000/- p.a. for legal aid upto High Courts; and
(m) Steps for framing rules for refund of court fees and execution of Awards passed by Lok Adalats.
National Legal Services Authority was constituted on 5th December, 1995. His Lordship Hon. Dr. Justice
A.S. Anand, Judge, Supreme Court of India took over as the Executive Chairman of National Legal
Services Authority on 17the July, 1997. Soon after assuming the office, His Lordship initiated steps for
making the National Legal Services Authority functional. The first Member Secretary of the authority
joined in December, 1997 and by January, 1998 the other officers and staff were also appointed. By
February, 1998 the office of National Legal Services Authority became properly functional for the first
time.
In October, 1998, His Lordship Hon. Dr. Justice A.S. Anand assumed the Office of the Chief Justice of
India and thus became the Patron-in-Chief of National Legal Services Authority. His Lordship Hon. Mr.
Justice S.P. Bharucha, the senior-most Judge of the Supreme Court of India assumed the office of the
Executive Chairman, National Legal Services Authority.
The First Annual Meet of the State Legal Services Authorities was held on 12th of September, 1998 at
Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi which was presided over by His Lordship Hon. Dr. Justice A.S. Anand, the
then Executive Chairman, NALSA. His Lordship Hon. Mr. Justice S.B. Majmudar, Judge, Supreme Court
of India and Chairman, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, the Members of the Central Authority
8 | Page
and the Executive Chairmen and Member Secretaries of the State Legal Services Authorities attended this
Meet. In this Meet, the progress of on-going schemes which had been initiated by NALSA was examined
and decisions of far reaching implications were taken with a view to strengthen and streamline legal aid
programmes in the country. The Second Annual Meet of the State Legal Services Authorities was held at
Jubilee Hall, Hyderabad on 9th of October, 1999. This Meet was inaugurated by His Lordship Hon. Dr.
Justice A.S. Anand, the Chief Justice of India and Patron-in-Chief, NALSA. Hon. Mr. Justice S.P.
Bharucha, Executive Chairman, NALSA delivered the keynote address. Other dignitaries present at the
inaugural function included Hon. Mr. Justice S.B. Majmudar, Judge, Supreme Court of India and
Chairman, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, Hon. Mr. Justice M.S. Liberhan, Chief Justice of
Andhra Pradesh High Court and Members of Central Authority.
In pursuance of the call given by His Lordship Hon. Dr. Justice A.S. Anand, the Chief Justice of India in
the First Annual Meet, 9th of November is being celebrated every year by all Legal Services Authorities
as "Legal Services Day".
NALSA is laying great deal of emphasis on legal literacy and legal awareness campaign. Almost all the
State Legal Services Authorities are identifying suitable and trustworthy NGOs through whom legal
literacy campaign may be taken to tribal, backward and far-flung areas in the country. The effort is to
publicise legal aid schemes so that the target group, for whom Legal Services Authorities Act has
provided for free legal aid, may come to know about the same and approach the concerned legal services
functionaries.
NALSA has also called upon State Legal Services Authorities to set up legal aid cells in jails so that the
prisoners lodged therein are provided prompt and efficient legal aid to which they are entitled by virtue of
section 12 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
Constitution of State Legal Services Authority:
A State Authority shall consist of
(a) the Chief Justice of the High Court who shall be the Patron-in-Chief;
{b) a serving or retired Judge of the High Court, to be nominated by the Governor, in consultation with
the Chief Justice of the High Court, who shall be the Executive Chairman; and
9 | Page
(c) such number of other Members, possessing such experience and qualifications, as may be prescribed
by the State Government, to be nominated by that Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of
the High Court.
The State Government shall, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, appoint a person
belonging to the State Higher Judicial Service not lower in rank than that of a District Judge, as the
Member-Secretary of the State Authority, to exercise such powers and perform such duties under the
Executive Chairman of the State Authority as may be prescribed by that Government or as may be
assigned to him by the Executive Chairman of that Authority.
A person functioning as Secretary of a State Legal Aid & Advice Board immediately before the date of
constitution of the State Authority may be appointed as Member-Secretary of that Authority, even if he is
not qualified to be appointed as such under this sub-section, for a period not exceeding five years.
The administrative expenses of the State Authority, including the salaries, allowances and pensions
payable to the Member-Secretary, officers and other employees of the State Authority shall be defrayed
out of the Consolidated Fund of the State.
a) give legal service to persons who satisfy the criteria laid down under this Act.
b) conduct Lok Adalats, including Lok Adalats for High Court cases;
c) undertake preventive and strategic legal aid programmes; and
d) perform such other functions as the State Authority may, in consultation with the Central Authority, fix
by regulations.
Constitution of the District Legal Services Authority:
A District Authority shall consist of :a) the District Judge who shall be its Chairman; and
b) such number of other Members, possessing such experience and qualifications as may be prescribed by
the State Government, to be nominated by that Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the
High Court.
The administrative expenses of every District Authority, including the salaries, allowances and pensions
payable to the Secretary, officers and other employees of the District Authority shall be defrayed out of
the Consolidated Fund of the State.
12 | P a g e
1.Central, State, District and Taluk Legal Services Authority has been created who are responsible for
organizing Lok Adalats at such intervals and place.
2.Conciliators for Lok Adalat comprise the following: a. A sitting or retired judicial officer.
b. other persons of repute as may be prescribed by the State Government in consultation with the Chief
Justice of High Court.
Section 20: Reference of Cases
Cases can be referred for consideration of Lok Adalat as under:1. By consent of both the parties to the disputes.
2. One of the parties makes an application for reference.
3. Where the Court is satisfied that the matter is an appropriate one to be taken cognizance of by the Lok
Adalat.
4. Compromise settlement shall be guided by the principles of justice, equity, fair play and other legal
principles.
5. Where no compromise has been arrived at through conciliation, the matter shall be returned to the
concerned court for disposal in accordance with Law.
Section 21
After the agreement is arrived by the consent of the parties, award is passed by the conciliators. The
matter need not be referred to the concerned Court for consent decree.
The Act provisions envisages as under:
1. Every award of Lok Adalat shall be deemed as decree of Civil Court.
2. Every award made by the Lok Adalat shall be final and binding on all the parties to the dispute.
3. No appeal shall lie from the award of the Lok Adalat.
13 | P a g e
Section 22
Every proceedings of the Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings for the purpose of :1. Summoning of Witnesses.
2. Discovery of documents.
3. Reception of evidences.
4. Requisitioning of Public record.
According to section 2(1) (a) of the Act, legal aid can be provided to a person for a 'case' which includes a
suit or any proceeding before a court. Section 2(1) (aaa) defines the 'court' as a civil, criminal or revenue
court and includes any tribunal or any other authority constituted under any law for the time being in
force, to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial functions. As per section 2(1)(c) 'legal service' includes the
rendering of any service in the conduct of any case or other legal proceeding before any court or other
authority or tribunal and the giving of advice on any legal matter.
Recent Amendments To Made To The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 was enacted to constitute legal services authorities for
providing free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society to ensure that
opportunities for securing justice were not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other
disabilities and to organize Lok Adalats to ensure that the operation of the legal system promoted justice
on a basis of equal opportunity. The system of Lok Adalat, which is an innovative mechanism for
alternate dispute resolution, has proved effective for resolving disputes in a spirit of conciliation outside
the courts.
However, the major drawback in the existing scheme of organization of the Lok Adalats under Chapter
VI of the said Act is that the system of Lok Adalats is mainly based on compromise or settlement between
the parties. If the parties do not arrive at any compromise or settlement, the case is either returned to the
court of law or the parties are advised to seek remedy in a court of law. This causes unnecessary delay in
the dispensation of justice. If Lok Adalats are given power to decide the cases on merits in case parties
fails to arrive at any compromise or settlement, this problem can be tackled to a great extent. Further, the
cases which arise in relation to public utility services such as Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited,
Delhi Vidyut Board, etc., need to be settled urgently so that people get justice without delay even at prelitigation stage and thus most of the petty cases which ought not to go in the regular courts would be
14 | P a g e
settled at the pre-litigation stage itself which would result in reducing the workload of the regular courts
to a great extent. It is, therefore, proposed to amend the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to set up
Permanent Lok Adalats for providing compulsory pre-litigative mechanism for conciliation and
settlement of cases relating to public utility services.
statutory provisions giving a person the right to lawyer, opined that this was, a privilege given to
accused and it is his duty to ask for a lawyer if he wants to engage one or get his relations to engage one
for him. the only duty cast on the Magistrate is to afford him the necessary opportunity (to do so).
The linkage between Article 21 and the right to free legal aid was forged in the decision in Hussainara
Khatoon v. State of Bihar where the court was appalled at the plight of thousands of undertrials
languishing in the jails in Bihar for years on end without ever being represented by a lawyer. The court
declared that "there can be no doubt that speedy trial, and by speedy trial, we mean reasonably
expeditious trial, is an integral and essential part of the fundamental right to life and liberty enshrined in
Article 21." The court pointed out that Article 39-A emphasised that free legal service was an inalienable
element of 'reasonable, fair and just' procedure and that the right to free legal services was implicit in the
guarantee of Article 21.
In M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra, it was declared that: "If a prisoner sentenced to imprisonment is
virtually unable to exercise his constitutional and statutory right of appeal inclusive of special leave to
appeal (to the Supreme Court) for want of legal assistance, there is implicit in the Court under Article 142
read with Articles 21 and 39-A of the Constitution, power to assign counsel for such imprisoned
individual 'for doing complete justice".
In Khatri & Others v. St. of Bihar & others; "Right to free legal aid, just, fair and reasonable
procedures is a fundamental right (Khatoon's Case). It is elementary that the jeopardy to his personal
liberty arises as soon as the person is arrested and is produced before a magistrate for it is at this stage
that he gets the 1st opportunity to apply for bail and obtain his release as also to resist remain to police or
jail custody. This is the stage at which an accused person needs competent legal advice and
representation. No procedure can be said to be just, fair and reasonable which denies legal advice and
representation to the accused at this stage. Thus, state is under a constitutional obligation to provide free
to aid to the accused not only at the stage of...... Every individual of the society are entitled as a matter of
prerogative."
In Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain the Court: "Rule Of Law is basic structure of constitution of India.
Every individual is guaranteed the rights given to him under the constitution. No one so condemn
unheard. Equality of justice. There ought to be a violation to the fundamental right or prerogatives, or
privileges, only then remedy go to Court of Law. But also at the stage when he is first produced before
the magistrate. In absence of legal aid, trial is vitiated."
16 | P a g e