Basics About Transcendentalism
Basics About Transcendentalism
Basics About Transcendentalism
Parker, Elizabeth Palmer Peabody, George & Sophia Ripley, Jones Very,
and others.
Central Points of Agreement
NOTE : The Transcendentalists, in keeping with the individualistic nature
of this philosophy, disagreed readily with each other. Here are four points
of general agreement:
Basic Assumption:
The intuitive faculty, instead of the rational or sensical, became the means
for a conscious union of the individual psyche (known in Sanskrit as
Atman) with the world psyche also known as the Oversoul, life-force,
prime mover and God (known in Sanskrit as Brahma).
Basic Premises:
1. An individual is the spiritual center of the universe - and in an individual
can be found the clue to nature, history and, ultimately, the cosmos itself.
It is not a rejection of the existence of God, but a preference to explain an
individual and the world in terms of an individual.
2. The structure of the universe literally duplicates the structure of the
individual self - all knowledge, therefore, begins with self-knowledge. This
is similar to Aristotle's dictum "know thyself."
3. Transcendentalists accepted the neo-Platonic conception of nature as a
living mystery, full of signs - nature is symbolic.
4. The belief that individual virtue and happiness depend upon selfrealization - this depends upon the reconciliation of two universal
psychological tendencies:
a. the expansive or self-transcending tendency - a desire to embrace the
whole world - to know and become one with the world.
b. the contracting or self-asserting tendency - the desire to withdraw,
remain unique and separate - an egotistical existence.
This dualism assumes our two psychological needs; the contracting: being
unique, different, special, having a racial identity,ego-centered, selfish,
and so on; the expansive: being the same as others, altruistic, be one of
the human race, and so on.
The transcendentalist expectation is to move from the contracting to the
expansive. This dualism has aspects of Freudian id and superego; the
Jungian shadow and persona, the Chinese ying/yang, and the Hindu
2
10