A Comparative Study On 4G and 5G Technology For Wireless Applications

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSR-JECE)

e-ISSN: 2278-2834,p- ISSN: 2278-8735.Volume 10, Issue 6, Ver. III (Nov - Dec .2015), PP 67-72
www.iosrjournals.org

A Comparative Study on 4G and 5G Technology for Wireless


Applications
B.G.Gopal1, P.G.Kuppusamy2,
1,2

Professors, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering Veltech Multitech Dr.Rangarajan


Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College Avadi, Chennai, India

Abstract: The 5G wireless technology is based upon modified 4G, which at present is facing many problems to
meet its performance goals. The comparison between 4G and 5G wireless technology in relation to its speed,
frequency band, switching design basis and forward error correction is studied. The 5G wireless technology
helps to solve the problems of poor coverage, bad interconnectivity, poor quality of service and flexibility. An
ideal 5G wireless technology to accommodate the challenges and shortfalls of 4G deployments is discussed as
well as the significant system improvements on the earlier wireless technologies. The importance of the
comparative study is estimated for a speed and effective connection and communication of devices like wireless
devices and other hardware.
Keywords: 5G, MIMO Antenna, Wireless communication, PIFA (Planar Inverted F Antenna), FR4 (Fire
Retard 4)

I.

Introduction

Mobile network technology is moving at a relentless pace, and its being built around not one, but two
industry juggernauts: Fourth-generation wireless and fifth-generation wireless. The assimilation of the Internet
of Things (IoT) world into both 4G and 5G technologies makes this wireless labyrinth even harder to get
around.
5G is the coming fifth-generation wireless broadband technology based on the IEEE 802.11ac
standard. 5G will provide better speeds and coverage than the current 4G. 5G operates with a 5 GHz signal and
is set to offer speeds of up to 1 Gb/s for tens of connections or tens of Mb/s for tens of thousands of connections.
4G is synonymous with Long Term Evolution (LTE) technology, which is an evolution of the existing
3G wireless standard. In fact, LTE is an advanced form of 3G that marks an audacious shift from hybrid data
and voice networks to a data-only IP network.
There are two key technologies that enable LTE to achieve higher data throughput than predecessor 3G
networks: MIMO and OFDM. Orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) is a transmission technique
that uses a large number of closely-spaced carriers that are modulated with low data rates. It is a spectral
efficiency scheme that enables high data rates and permits multiple users to share a common channel.
Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technique further improves data throughput and spectral
efficiency by using multiple antennas at the transmitter and receiver. It uses complex digital signal processing to
set up multiple data streams on the same channel..
The LTE standard uses both forms of duplex operations: Frequency division duplex (FDD) and time
division duplex (TDD).
Finally, a quick note about the LTE categories. There are different categories of LTE networks, and
from a consumer perspective, they mainly differ in terms of theoretical speed under ideal conditions.
LTE-Advanced: The bridge between 4G and 5G
LTE Advanced or LTE-A is the evolution of the original LTE technology toward even higher
bandwidths. LTE-A promises nearly three times greater speed than the basic LTE network and comprises of the
following five building blocks:
1. Carrier Aggregation
2. Increased MIMO
3. Coordinated Multipoint (CoMP)
4. Relay Station
5. Heterogeneous Network or HetNet
6. s Network or HetNet

DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772

www.iosrjournals.org

67 | Page

A Comparative Study on 4G and 5G Technology for Wireless Applications

Figure-1. LTE building blocks


Carrier aggregation or channel aggregation is a transmission scheme that allows up to 20 channels from
different spectrums to be combined into a single data stream.
Next, LTE-A raises the MIMO bar to 88 antenna configurations to increase the number of radio
streams using the beamsteering technique.
Third, CoMP or cooperative MIMO, allows mobile devices to send and receive radio signals from
multiple cells to reduce interference from other cells and ensure optimum performance at the cell edges.
Fourth, a relay in an LTE-A setting is a base station that uses multi-hop communications at the cell
edges; it receives a weak signal and retransmits it with an enhanced quality.
Fifth and the most crucial one is HetNet, a multilayered system of overlapping big and small cells to
pump out cheap bandwidth.
HetNet, a gradual evolution of the cellular architecture, is a vastly more complex network as small cells
add hundreds or even thousands of entry points into the cellular system. The self-organizing network (SON)
concept is one of the key enabling technologies being considered for LTE-A applications.
Here, its worth noting that while LTE-A standard creates a bridge between 4G and 5G worlds, in
many ways, the notion of HetNet is serving as glue between LTE-A and 5G worlds. Thats why many wireless
industry observers call 5G wireless an enhanced form of LTE-A.
That makes sense because the main concept behind 5G systems is to expand the idea of small cell
network to a whole new level and create a super dense network that will put tiny cells in every room.
The Next Generation Mobile Networks (NGMN) Alliance defines 5G as below:
5G is an end-to-end ecosystem to enable a fully mobile and connected society. It empowers value
creation toward customers and partners, through existing and emerging use cases delivered with consistent
experience and enabled by sustainable business models.
Essentially, LTE-A is the foundation of the 5G radio access network (RAN) below 6 GHz while the
frequencies from 6 GHz to 100 GHz will explore new technologies in parallel. Take MIMO, for instance, where
5G raises the bar to Massive MIMO technology, a large array of radiating elements that extends the antenna
matrix to a new level1616 to 256256 MIMOand takes a leap of faith in wireless network speed and
coverage.
The early blueprint of 5G pilot networks mostly comprises of beam forming technology and small cell
base stations. The goals of 5G technology can be summarized in the following value points:
1,000x increase in capacity
Support for 100+ billion connections
Up to 10Gbit/s speeds
Below 1ms latency

II.

4g And 5g Difference

a) First and foremost, while the LTE-based 4G networks are going through a rapid deployment, 5G networks
mostly comprise of research papers and pilot projects.
b) Wireless networks till 4G mostly focused on the availability of raw bandwidth, while 5G is aiming on
providing pervasive connectivity to lay grounds for fast and resilient access to the Internet users, whether they
are on a top of a skyscraper or down under a subway station. Although LTE standard is incorporating a variant
called machine type communications (MTC) for the IoT traffic, 5G technologies are being designed from
grounds up to support MTC-like devices.
c) The 5G networks are not going to be a monolithic network entity and will be built around a combination of
technologies: 2G, 3G, LTE, LTE-A, Wi-Fi, M2M, etc. In other words, 5G will be designed to support a variety
of applications such as the IoT, connected wearables, augmented reality and immersive gaming. Unlike its 4G
DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772

www.iosrjournals.org

68 | Page

A Comparative Study on 4G and 5G Technology for Wireless Applications


counterpart, 5G network will offer the ability to handle a plethora of connected devices and a myriad of traffic
types. For example, 5G will provide ultra-high-speed links for HD video streaming as well as low-data-rate
speeds for sensor networks.

Figure-2. 5G Application architecture.


d) The 5G networks will pioneer new architectures like cloud RAN and virtual RAN to facilitate a more
centralized network establishment and make the best use of server farms through localized data centers at the
network edges.
e) Finally, 5G will spearhead the use of cognitive radio techniques to allow the infrastructure to automatically
decide about the type of channel to be offered, differentiate between mobile and fixed objects, and adapt to
conditions at a given time. In other words, 5G networks will be able to serve the industrial Internet and social
network apps at the same time.
Table 1. Comparison of 4G and 5G Technologies
Specifications
Full form

Fourth Generation

Data Bandwidth

2Mbps to 1Gbps

Frequency Band

2 to 8 GHz
Al access convergence including
OFDMA,MC-CDMA,network-LMPS

Standards
Technologies
Service
Multiple Access
Core network
Handoff

4G

Unified IP, seamless integration of


broadband LAN/WAN/PAN and WLAN
Dynamic information access, wearable
devices, HD streaming, global roaming
CDMA
All IP network
Horizontal and vertical

5G
Fifth Generation
1Gbps and higher
as per need
3 to 300 GHz
CDMA and BDMA
Unified IP, seamless integration of broadband
LAN/WAN/PAN/WLAN and advanced technologies based on
OFDM modulation used in 5G
Dynamic information access, werable devices, HD streaming, any
demand of users
CDMA,BDMA
Flatter IP network, 5G network interfacing(5G-NI)
Horizontal and vertical

These 5th generation of systems are driven by OFDM, MC-CDMA, LAS-CDMA, UWB, Network
LMDS and IPV6. Table above compares 4G versus 5G technologies and mentions differences between them.

III.

The Next Generation Of Mobile Technology:

The Internet Of Things And 5g


A relatively new phenomenon, the Internet of Things (IoT), also called the Industrial Internet or
even the Internet of Everything, takes these simple automated tasks to the next level by enabling objects to
communicate data with connected devices.
Eventually, IoT as we know it will progress from simple home and building automation to more advanced
application areas. In the ideal Internet of Things, mobile devices will be able to collect and interpret data
such as location and known preferences, and communicate with smart objects without requiring our
input at all.
The wide range of possible future applications for the Internet of Things include:
Media
While driving past a billboard on the highway or watching a commercial on television, data collected
by our devices shows that the type of product being advertised and we are automatically messaged with
more information.
Transportation

DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772

www.iosrjournals.org

69 | Page

A Comparative Study on 4G and 5G Technology for Wireless Applications


Not only can car parallel park, but it can navigate and drive on its own. Similar improvements to trains
and aircraft are just a few of the ways that IoT can help us get around as technology progresses.
Healthcare
Medical devices automatically administer medications and monitor patients conditions as well as their
overall well-being. Pacemakers, hearing aids, and heart monitors streamline medical care by
communicating with doctors and patients.
Environment and energy conservation
Sensors optimize energy consumption by powering lights and electronics based on a persons activity.
On a larger scale, an improved IoT helps monitor water and air quality, among other environmental
concerns.
Infrastructure
IoT sensors monitor the structural stability of bridges, railways, and waste management systems for
safety and security.
With the wide use of smart phones in the society, the Internet of Things has an easy way to collect and use our
personal data to communicate with objects and smart devices. But to get a jump-start on making IoT possible,
we need to create the next generation of mobile technology to optimize smart phones.

IV.

When 5g Replaces 4g Lte

5G is the chosen moniker for the next generation of wireless communication. 5G is currently just a concept, but
it is expected to be implemented by 2020 giving the mobile industry a lot of work to do in a short amount of
time.
Most wireless communication professionals agree that when 5G replaces 4G LTE, it should address three key
needs:
1. A decreased latency of less than one second.
2. Increased data rates of at least one gigabit per second for tens of thousands of users simultaneously.
3. Increased energy efficiency.

Figure-3. Challenges and Scenarios


Whatever improvements are made to wireless communication by the release of 5G, the main goal is for
mobile technology, data collection, and wireless communication to be more seamlessly integrated through speed
and efficiency. Without these features, the Internet of Things wont work correctly and will be redundant.
Optimizing Antenna Design For 5g And The Internet Of Things
The Internet of Things, and the next generation of wireless communication, 5G, its coming soon. First,
we need to optimize the performance of existing mobile device antennas.
Among the many developments researchers from across the globe are already working on for 5G,
the optimization of mobile device antennas is an important topic to study. Though 5G applications have not
been standardized yet and many researchers are developing a range of devices to expand the world of IoT,
we can start by looking at a basic introductory model showing how to design a small antenna in a mobile
device.

V.

Optimizing The Design Of A Mobile Device Antenna

A mobile device antenna must be small and lightweight enough to fit in the limited amount of space
allotted for it in a smart phones design. Planar inverted-F antennas (PIFA) are a good choice for mobile
communication because they are small, powerful, and efficient. These antennas can cover multiple frequency
DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772

www.iosrjournals.org

70 | Page

A Comparative Study on 4G and 5G Technology for Wireless Applications


bands for cellular devices, WiFi, and Bluetooth technology which makes them a great choice for IoT
compatible objects and devices.
The mobile device antenna simulated in this paper includes a 4G device made up of a PIFA on a PTFE
block with an FR4 circuit board, ABS housing, and glass with a composite silicon substrate. The antenna itself
is made up of the PTFE block with a thin copper layer for high conductivity, a lumped port between a perfect
electric conductor (PEC) ground plane and feeding strip, as well as another strip shorted to the ground plane and
adjacent to the feeding strip for impedance matching purposes. It also includes an impedance matching gap that
matches the antenna to the reference impedance of 50 .

Figure-4. Model geometry of a planar inverted-F antenna in a mobile device.


For the simulation, this antenna can be modeled using PEC boundaries because of the low downlink
frequency range. The losses on the metal are inconsequential due to the high conductivity of the copper layer.
The PIFA is modeled in a spherical domain that is enclosed by perfectly matched layers (PML) to absorb its
outgoing radiation. The lumped port, with a reference impedance of 50 , is used to excite the PIFA and
evaluate its input impedance.
Through simulation, we have calculated the field distribution plot for the PIFA. Results show that the
field is strong at one end of the metallic surface at the top of the model, far from the feeding strip. These
measurements actually resemble those of a quarter wave monopole antenna, a design from which the PIFA is
derived.

Figure-5. Results plot of the electric field distribution at the top of the PIFA.
The simulation also calculates the polar-formatted far-field radiation pattern. The azimuthal radiation
pattern is no longer omni directional since the antenna is now miniaturized and located on only one corner of the
ground plane.
From the S-parameters, we can see that the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) is less than 2:1. This
means that the antenna input impedance is well matched to the reference impedance, which is a typical
measurement in network analyzers.

DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772

www.iosrjournals.org

71 | Page

A Comparative Study on 4G and 5G Technology for Wireless Applications

Figure-6. The S-parameters of the given AWS downlink frequency range are calculated.
Going beyond the results of 2D far-field calculations, we are also able to review the simulation in a 3D radiation
pattern to show maximum radiation and null.

Figure-7 The far-field radiation pattern of the PIFA plotted in 3D.

VI.

Conclusion

To address 5G applications, there are many developments to be considered above the introductory
model. In order to handle higher data rates, the operating frequency has to be increased to a millimeter range
from which we can achieve a wider bandwidth. This will result in higher path loss between transmitters and
receivers, so antennas need to provide higher gain to reach a longer distance.
However, this will significantly reduce the covering range in terms of angle because the radiation
pattern will be very sharp. Consequently, phased array antennas are required to get over the limit of angular
dependency of high-gain antennas using the ability to steer a radiation beam toward wanted directions.
By optimizing the design and performance of mobile device antennas, including those just mentioned, the ideal
Internet of Things will be here before we know it, and we will be ready to embrace the new technology.

References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]

NEC Corporation White Paper -2015


S.Venkata Krishna Kumar and Poornima.T.V, A Study of Wireless Mobile Technology International Journal of Advanced
Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, Volume 4, Issue 1,January 2014 .
Dr. Krishna Mohanta and Dr.V.Khanaa, 4G TECHNOLOGY International Journal Of engineering And Computer ,Volume 2,
Issue 2, Feb 2013.
Amir Esmailpour, Veljko Knezevic, Mariaracias, and Gelareh Kokabian, Integration of 4G wireless technologies in a Test-Bed
environment, International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN) Vol. 5, No. 1, February 2013.
Prof. D. U. Adokar and Priti J. Rajput, Wireless Evolution with 4G Technologies International Journal of Advanced Research in
Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Volume 1, Issue 4, October 2012.
K.Kumaravel , Comparative Study of 3G and 4G in Mobile Technology JCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues,
Vol. 8, Issue 5, No 3, September 2011.

DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772

www.iosrjournals.org

72 | Page

You might also like