A Comparative Study On 4G and 5G Technology For Wireless Applications
A Comparative Study On 4G and 5G Technology For Wireless Applications
A Comparative Study On 4G and 5G Technology For Wireless Applications
e-ISSN: 2278-2834,p- ISSN: 2278-8735.Volume 10, Issue 6, Ver. III (Nov - Dec .2015), PP 67-72
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: The 5G wireless technology is based upon modified 4G, which at present is facing many problems to
meet its performance goals. The comparison between 4G and 5G wireless technology in relation to its speed,
frequency band, switching design basis and forward error correction is studied. The 5G wireless technology
helps to solve the problems of poor coverage, bad interconnectivity, poor quality of service and flexibility. An
ideal 5G wireless technology to accommodate the challenges and shortfalls of 4G deployments is discussed as
well as the significant system improvements on the earlier wireless technologies. The importance of the
comparative study is estimated for a speed and effective connection and communication of devices like wireless
devices and other hardware.
Keywords: 5G, MIMO Antenna, Wireless communication, PIFA (Planar Inverted F Antenna), FR4 (Fire
Retard 4)
I.
Introduction
Mobile network technology is moving at a relentless pace, and its being built around not one, but two
industry juggernauts: Fourth-generation wireless and fifth-generation wireless. The assimilation of the Internet
of Things (IoT) world into both 4G and 5G technologies makes this wireless labyrinth even harder to get
around.
5G is the coming fifth-generation wireless broadband technology based on the IEEE 802.11ac
standard. 5G will provide better speeds and coverage than the current 4G. 5G operates with a 5 GHz signal and
is set to offer speeds of up to 1 Gb/s for tens of connections or tens of Mb/s for tens of thousands of connections.
4G is synonymous with Long Term Evolution (LTE) technology, which is an evolution of the existing
3G wireless standard. In fact, LTE is an advanced form of 3G that marks an audacious shift from hybrid data
and voice networks to a data-only IP network.
There are two key technologies that enable LTE to achieve higher data throughput than predecessor 3G
networks: MIMO and OFDM. Orthogonal frequency division multiplex (OFDM) is a transmission technique
that uses a large number of closely-spaced carriers that are modulated with low data rates. It is a spectral
efficiency scheme that enables high data rates and permits multiple users to share a common channel.
Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technique further improves data throughput and spectral
efficiency by using multiple antennas at the transmitter and receiver. It uses complex digital signal processing to
set up multiple data streams on the same channel..
The LTE standard uses both forms of duplex operations: Frequency division duplex (FDD) and time
division duplex (TDD).
Finally, a quick note about the LTE categories. There are different categories of LTE networks, and
from a consumer perspective, they mainly differ in terms of theoretical speed under ideal conditions.
LTE-Advanced: The bridge between 4G and 5G
LTE Advanced or LTE-A is the evolution of the original LTE technology toward even higher
bandwidths. LTE-A promises nearly three times greater speed than the basic LTE network and comprises of the
following five building blocks:
1. Carrier Aggregation
2. Increased MIMO
3. Coordinated Multipoint (CoMP)
4. Relay Station
5. Heterogeneous Network or HetNet
6. s Network or HetNet
DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772
www.iosrjournals.org
67 | Page
II.
4g And 5g Difference
a) First and foremost, while the LTE-based 4G networks are going through a rapid deployment, 5G networks
mostly comprise of research papers and pilot projects.
b) Wireless networks till 4G mostly focused on the availability of raw bandwidth, while 5G is aiming on
providing pervasive connectivity to lay grounds for fast and resilient access to the Internet users, whether they
are on a top of a skyscraper or down under a subway station. Although LTE standard is incorporating a variant
called machine type communications (MTC) for the IoT traffic, 5G technologies are being designed from
grounds up to support MTC-like devices.
c) The 5G networks are not going to be a monolithic network entity and will be built around a combination of
technologies: 2G, 3G, LTE, LTE-A, Wi-Fi, M2M, etc. In other words, 5G will be designed to support a variety
of applications such as the IoT, connected wearables, augmented reality and immersive gaming. Unlike its 4G
DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772
www.iosrjournals.org
68 | Page
Fourth Generation
Data Bandwidth
2Mbps to 1Gbps
Frequency Band
2 to 8 GHz
Al access convergence including
OFDMA,MC-CDMA,network-LMPS
Standards
Technologies
Service
Multiple Access
Core network
Handoff
4G
5G
Fifth Generation
1Gbps and higher
as per need
3 to 300 GHz
CDMA and BDMA
Unified IP, seamless integration of broadband
LAN/WAN/PAN/WLAN and advanced technologies based on
OFDM modulation used in 5G
Dynamic information access, werable devices, HD streaming, any
demand of users
CDMA,BDMA
Flatter IP network, 5G network interfacing(5G-NI)
Horizontal and vertical
These 5th generation of systems are driven by OFDM, MC-CDMA, LAS-CDMA, UWB, Network
LMDS and IPV6. Table above compares 4G versus 5G technologies and mentions differences between them.
III.
DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772
www.iosrjournals.org
69 | Page
IV.
5G is the chosen moniker for the next generation of wireless communication. 5G is currently just a concept, but
it is expected to be implemented by 2020 giving the mobile industry a lot of work to do in a short amount of
time.
Most wireless communication professionals agree that when 5G replaces 4G LTE, it should address three key
needs:
1. A decreased latency of less than one second.
2. Increased data rates of at least one gigabit per second for tens of thousands of users simultaneously.
3. Increased energy efficiency.
V.
A mobile device antenna must be small and lightweight enough to fit in the limited amount of space
allotted for it in a smart phones design. Planar inverted-F antennas (PIFA) are a good choice for mobile
communication because they are small, powerful, and efficient. These antennas can cover multiple frequency
DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772
www.iosrjournals.org
70 | Page
Figure-5. Results plot of the electric field distribution at the top of the PIFA.
The simulation also calculates the polar-formatted far-field radiation pattern. The azimuthal radiation
pattern is no longer omni directional since the antenna is now miniaturized and located on only one corner of the
ground plane.
From the S-parameters, we can see that the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) is less than 2:1. This
means that the antenna input impedance is well matched to the reference impedance, which is a typical
measurement in network analyzers.
DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772
www.iosrjournals.org
71 | Page
Figure-6. The S-parameters of the given AWS downlink frequency range are calculated.
Going beyond the results of 2D far-field calculations, we are also able to review the simulation in a 3D radiation
pattern to show maximum radiation and null.
VI.
Conclusion
To address 5G applications, there are many developments to be considered above the introductory
model. In order to handle higher data rates, the operating frequency has to be increased to a millimeter range
from which we can achieve a wider bandwidth. This will result in higher path loss between transmitters and
receivers, so antennas need to provide higher gain to reach a longer distance.
However, this will significantly reduce the covering range in terms of angle because the radiation
pattern will be very sharp. Consequently, phased array antennas are required to get over the limit of angular
dependency of high-gain antennas using the ability to steer a radiation beam toward wanted directions.
By optimizing the design and performance of mobile device antennas, including those just mentioned, the ideal
Internet of Things will be here before we know it, and we will be ready to embrace the new technology.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
DOI: 10.9790/2834-10636772
www.iosrjournals.org
72 | Page