Report On Loan Portfolio Management
Report On Loan Portfolio Management
Report On Loan Portfolio Management
INTRODUCTION
Development of a countrys economy depends on the growth of its industries. Industries always need funds
to efficiently run their operations. Banks are the major source of funds because they help to create a
connection between savings and investment. Banks collect funds from the surplus group as deposits and
supply funds to the deficit groups as loans and advances. Interest is the cost of funds which banks provide
to the depositors and charged from the debtors. As banks deal with the money of people, they have to
maintain a good portfolio thus the risk is reduced and return is maximized.
Bangladesh, a developing economy, has the potential of becoming one of the leading economies. The
banking sector is well structured and is guided by Bangladesh Bank, which is the central bank of the
economy. Numerous changes taken place in the banking industry because of increasing technological
advance and the number of banks which forced the banks to increase performance and innovate new
services. At present there is total 56 scheduled banks where 5 are state owned commercial banks, 3
specialized banks, 39 private commercial banks (31 conventional and 8 Islamic banks) and 9 foreign
commercial banks. (FINANCIAL SYSTEM. RETRIEVED FROM WWW.BANGLADESH-BANK.ORG/FNANSYS/BANKFI.PHP)
Agrani Bank Limited (ABL) is one of the leading state owned commercial banks and provides a decent
portion of total loans in Bangladesh. ABL has maintained a diversified loan portfolio through various types
of loans and advances products. The total loan provided by ABL is 20,296 crore, which is 4.26% of total
loans and advances of Bangladesh (ANNUAL REPORT OF ABL, 2013). The bank is trying to make its
portfolio more expanded by creating new products and services like Green Banking, SME loan etc.
Loan Portfolio management is a crucial task for banks because loans are delivered from the funds of
depositors and banks must meet their claims. Loans stand also the main source of income for banks.
Soundness and safety of a bank depends on its investment of funds as loans and advances. Well-diversified
portfolio helps banks to reduce loan related risks like liquidity risk, credit risk, etc.
The key focus of this report is to analyze how well ABL has managed its loan portfolio. For this, the study
includes a comparative analysis of ABL and City Bank Ltd. and a statistical analysis of the impact of loan
Portfolio, interest expense and operating expense over net profit. This analysis will help to understand the
idea of loan portfolio management.
Page 1
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
1. To gather ideas about the overall credit policy of the ABL.
2. To understand the overall lending process of ABL.
3. To identify the problems related with the loan portfolio of ABL.
4. To compare the performance of the loan portfolio of ABL with City bank Ltd.
5. To pinpoint the relationship of loan portfolio and profitability.
6. To collect idea about the rules and regulations provided by Bangladesh Bank to manage portfolio
of loans and advances.
1.3 METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN
The research is descriptive based on secondary data which all address the every W/H question: who,
what, when, where and how of the objectives of the research.
Page 2
SOURCES OF DATA
o PRIMARY SOURCES:
o SECONDARY SOURCES:
Annual reports of ABL and City Bank Ltd. (FY 2009- FY 2013)
DATA ANALYSIS
The report will provide both qualitative and quantitative analyses. AT First theoretical discussion will
be presented to understand the loan portfolio management and the portfolio of ABL. After this,
following methods will be used for quantitative discussion:
Comparison of profitability, liquidity and credit quality ratios related of ABL and City Bank
Ltd
Regression analysis by using SPSS.
Bar Charts and Line Graphs will be used to present graphical analysis of data.
After quantitative analysis, logical arguments will be discussed on the basis of results.
Page 3
Page 4
LITERATURE REVIEW
Harry Markowitz is known as the father of modern portfolio theory. In his paper, which is known as
Portfolio Selection (1952), he stated that there are two stages to select a portfolio. One is experience and
observation which will help to estimate future performance and another is relevant beliefs about future
performances which will lead to choice of portfolio. He also discussed about portfolio rule, which is the
motive of diversification to ensure maximum expected return.
Nails (2010) stated that, to manage risk banks use loan portfolio management after originating loans.
According to the author loan review is the critical element for a strong portfolio management. Controlling
credit risk is a crucial part of loan portfolio management, which is identified in the paper.
Biswas and Mondal (2012) have identified four major concerns for managers in order to maintain loan
portfolio. The first is to keep enough liquidity to meet the demand of depositors when deposit outflows
occur. Second, managers have to pursue an acceptable level of low risk by gaining assets with low default
rate and diversifying assets through asset management. The Third consideration is, for liability management
bank should have bonds with low cost. And the fourth is, capital adequacy management, which means the
amount of capital the bank wants to maintain and acquire the needed.
Managers must understand not only the risk of each credit, but also the relation between each loan and the
portfolio (Loan Portfolio Management, 1998). The paper also suggested that risks are interrelated, which
means actions or events that affect one risk can have similar effects on other risks too. Nine risks are
identified in the research, which expose banks earnings and capital by lending. The risks are credit risk,
Interest rate risk, Liquidity risk, Price risk, Foreign Exchange risk, Transaction risk, Compliance risk,
Strategic risk and Reputation risk.
David and Dionne (2005) discussed different diversification strategies that a bank may apply. They are
Geographical diversification, Industry Diversification, Size Diversification, Customer Diversification, Cost
of loan portfolio Diversification. They suggested that for managing the risks of portfolio the risks should
be divided in two categories: individual credit risk and total portfolio credit risk. The authors concluded
that it is difficult for banks to apply portfolio theory because flexible loan evaluation is necessary for banks
to capture the uniqueness of each loan. They also mentioned that diversification of loans can be inapplicable
because of low number of good borrowers which can also lead the bank to diseconomies.
Page 5
Page 6
DEPOSITS
a. Taka Account
a. Continuous Loan
b. Foreign Account
b. Term Loan
c. Rural and Agro Credit
d. Small and Medium Enterprise Loan
e. Import Finance
f.
TREASURY
Export Finance
OTHERS
a. Money market
a. Cash Service
b. Fund Transfer
c. Letter of Credit
d. Letter of Guarantee
d. Merchant Banking
e. Other
e. Islamic Banking
Page 7
3.1 At a Glance
Table 2 Highlights of ABL
Legal Status
Shareholders
Chairman
Registered office
899
Zonal Office
62
Corporate Branch
27
Circle Office
11
40
Foreign Correspondent
39
Paid up Capital
Total Deposits
Total Equity
Operating Profit
Page 8
Short Term
AAA
ST-1
BBB
ST-3
Outlook
Stable
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
CREDIT POLICY
5.1 CREDIT POLICY
Every bank in Bangladesh needs to follow rules and guidelines provided by Bangladesh Bank. On the basis
of these rules and guidelines banks prepare their credit policies for every year. The credit policies provide
a formal procedure to appraisal, sanction, and monitor loans.
Page 12
For Corporation
1. The corporation must me organized,
Bangladesh.
5. If it is a foreign company, it must have
authorization to borrow from local banks
under the supervision of Bangladesh Bank
and Board of Investment.
2. Foreign companies must be allowed by its
Board of Directors to borrow from local
banks.
Page 13
COLLECTION OF DATA
To analyze the credit proposal the bank should collect the below information in prescribed format:
Full details of Borrower
Details business in which the borrower is involved
Purpose of the Loan
Credit history with other banks should be collected from up to date CIB report
The financial position of the borrower and his/her business
Valuation of collateral presented by the borrower
Borrowers Relationship with suppliers and customers
Page 14
APPRAISAL ANALYSIS
Appraisal of a loan proposal is necessary to identify risks and measure the profitability. The appraisal should
be done with the latest market information and should be conducted by higher management and should be
reviewed from time to time. Through appraisal analysis the following aspects are measured:
Credit worthiness of the Borrower
The cash flow of the borrowers business
The benefits and cost of the loan
Break even analysis
Environmental issues of the proposed project
The competitiveness of the industry the borrower is doing business
Page 15
+
Target Yield (the percentage of profit bank wishes to make) is determined by the Asset
Liability Management Committee
= Base Lending rate (The minimum interest rate which bank usually charges to most credit worthy
customers)
+
Risk premium (the reward of bearing risk by the bank)
Page 16
7,918
2,128
2,833
638
1,119
380
345
175
550
1,947
115
174
758
972
Page 17
INDUSTRIAL CREDIT
8,000
7372
7,000
7482
6136
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
2,304
2873
1,000
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
The amount of loan increased significantly at 2012 and 2013. Its because government was trying to
increase the growth as well as providing incentives to provide loans in this section. There is an increasing
trend of sanctioning loan to industry by ABL.
Page 18
POWER SECTOR
Power Sector (BDT in Crore)
1,500
1,000
1120
2012
2013
746
500
195
74
0
1180
2009
2010
2011
GREEN BANKING
Bangladesh Bank has provided some incentives to encourage green financing. ABL has provided loans on
easy terms and conditions in order to maintain ecological balance and public health by reducing industry
wastage as well as dropping carbon emission. The bank has provided 48 lac taka in solar energy, 207 lac
taka in Bio-gas plant, and 1288 lac taka to Auto brick fields respectively up to 2013.
Graph 4 Green Financing
207
1,288
Solar Panel
Easy Bike
483
Bio Gas
Page 19
SME Financing
15,000
12100
10,000
14035
12496
11791
8745
5,000
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Page 20
257
250
200
143
150
100
76
50
0
Crops
15
11
Fisheries
Livestock
Poverty Alleviation
Others
Page 21
25,000
Loans
23242
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
3542
7114
437
172
3696
7425 6807
Repayable on demand Over 3 month but within Over 1 year but within 5 Over 5 years but within
1 year
years
10 years
As Bank have to pay depositors when they claim, it is necessary for banks to keep a balance between the
maturity of Deposits collected and Loans and Advances provided by the bank. If a bank fails to meet the
demand of customers for both depositors and borrowers, it may face huge losses as the customer may switch
to other banks for better services. From the above Graph we can see that the major portion of ABLs deposits
are medium term which means from 1year to 5 years and are long term which means over 5 years to 10
years. The bank has provided its most loans for short term which means for 3 months to 1 year and long
term for 5 years to 10 years. The bank can provide more repayable demand loans as they have large portion
of repayable deposits are in the hand.
Page 22
Special Mention
Sub Standard
Loan
Overdue Provision
Overdue
Provisio Overdue
Provisio Overdue
Period
Period
Period
50%
9 months
Continuous
loan
Demand
Loan
60 days or
5%
more
60 days or
5%
more
Fixed Term
60 days or
Loan more
more
5%
3 months
20%
Doubtful
Period
6 months
or more
or more
but less
but less
than 6
than 9
months
months
3 months
20%
6 months
or more
or more
but less
but less
than 6
than 9
months
months
3 months
20%
6 months
or more
or more
than 10 lac
but less
but less
taka
than 6
than 9
months
months
Fixed Term
loan up to
60 days or
5%
more
10 Lac taka
Short term
90 days or
agriculture
more
5%
6 months
20%
9 months
or more
or more
but less
but less
than 9
than 12
months
months
12 months
20%
36 months
or more
or more
and Micro
but less
but less
Credit
than 36
than 60
months
months
100%
or more
50%
9 months
100%
or more
50%
9 months
100%
or more
50%
12 months
100%
or more
50%
60 months
100%
or more
Page 23
CLASSIFIED LOANS
Classified Loans (BDT in Crore)
5380
6,000
4,000
3580
2374
2102
2149
2009
2010
2011
2,000
0
2012
2013
From the above Graph, we can see that the classified loan was decreasing initially, but it dramatically
increased in 2012. It is because the great recession in global economy affected Bangladeshs export, import.
Many big clients of the bank were on the verge of default. But through strong business strategy the bank
has reduced the classified loans. The percentage of classified loans to total loans in 2013 is almost 18%,
which is very high.
Page 24
3,000
Recovered
2638
2,500
2000
2,000
1,500
1,000
1660
1500
749
1500
957
1500
1033
843
500
-
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
The loan recovery process for ABL was not good enough as they failed to fulfill their targets except at
2013. The best loan recovery year for ABL was 2013. In 2013 it has surpassed the target by giving more
importance to the task of recovery. As a state owned bank the bank faces many problems to recover this
loans for example political influence, corruption by the employees etc.
Page 25
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
Regression Analysis is a statistical tool to measure the impact of variables, which are known as independent
variables, over a variable, which is known as dependent variable and the strength of the relationship between
the variables. There are two types of regression:
Linear Regression: In linear regression only one independent variable is used.
Multiple Regression: In multiple regression more than one independent variable is used.
In this paper multiple regression is calculated by using SPSS software.
Page 26
ANALYSIS
7.2.1 CORRELATION
A correlation is useful when we want to see the relationship between two variables; express the degree that
two variables change correspondingly. It shows, how well one variable can be explained by another. It can
assume any value from -1.00 to +1.00. A correlation coefficient of -1.00 or +1.00 indicates perfect
correlation, (+) sign for positive relationship and (-) sign for negative relationship. On the other hand, the
coefficient of determination (R2) is the primary way by which we can measure the extent of the association
that exists between two variables
The value of the Correlation Coefficient (R) and Coefficient of Determination (R2 and Adjusted R2) of the
model are shown in appendix table no. 20
SQUARE : It represents the explanation of the variability of dependent variable because of changes in
independent variables which means If the independent variables change by some units then the dependent
variables will be changed too and the measurement of changes are represented by R square. R square takes
value between 0% and 100%. From the appendix, table no. 20, we can see that the value of R square comes
.549 meaning that 54.9% changes in the dependent variable (Net profit) are happening for the changes of
the independent variables. And the least part (1 - .549) = 0.451 is changed by other factors which are not
considered.
ADJUSTED R SQUARE: Adjusted R square explains the changes of dependent variable if a new independent
variable is added in the estimated multiple regression. Form the appendix, table no. 20, we can see that the
value of Adjusted R square is -0.128 which shows that the independent variables didnt fit in the model.
Page 27
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS
H1: Loan portfolio, interest expense and operating expense have significant impact on Net profit.
Page 28
Page 29
FINDINGS
From the statistical analysis the following points are identified:
Page 30
Page 31
2.20%
2.04%
2%
1.33%
1.20%
0.63%
0.72%
0.70%
0.06%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
-4.92%
Agrani Bank
City Bank
The graph above shows ROA of ABL and CBL, where CBL had a higher ROA till 2011. ABL has a
fluctuating ROA which dropped to negative in the year 2012 because of global recession effects, which
decreases the return because cost and default rate was increased, but again it reached the highest point in
2013. CBL remains positive in 2012 though financial crisis, but it was struggling to increase returns after
the incident where the performance of Agrani Bank was amazing.
RETURN ON EQUITY
ROE is used to measure a firms ability to use shareholders equity to generate income. Its considered an
important indicator of a banks profitability and growth potential. It can be defined as percentage return on
each unit of equity invested in the bank
ROE = Net profit/Total Equity
Page 32
25%
2012
City Bank
5%
4%
2011
2013
-260%
10%
22%
2010
Agrani Bank
11%
2009
16%
14%
12%
RETURN ON EQUITY
From the above graph, it can be seen that the ROE of ABL is fluctuating including a huge amount of
negative value in 2012. On the other hand the ROE is declining for CBL. ABL has great comeback from
the loss of 2012 in 2013. The global crisis put a great impact on ABL where CBL remained positive. By
taking different strategies ABL is improving the ROE.
Page 33
7.13%
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.61%
5.24%
6.25%
4.77%
4.43%
4.00%
3.00%
3.83%
3.70%
3.43%
2.00%
1.00%
1.61%
0.00%
2009
2010
2011
Agrani Bank
2012
2013
City Bank
The above chart shows that NIM is in declining for both banks. ABL has the more fluctuated NIM than that
of CBL. It is because as the classified loans are higher in ABL bank and thats why the bank has to borrow
more funds in order to pay customers. CBL tried to stabilize NIM as much as possible. ABL has failed to
keep its control and the rate decreases severely from 2010 to 2012. ABL is trying to increase the NIM by
reducing interest expense.
Page 34
72%
61%
48%
2009
55%
55%
44%
2010
46%
2011
Agrani Bank
47%
2012
53%
2013
City Bank
From the above graph we can see that the C/I ratio of ABL is higher than CBL. The C/I ratio is rising for
both banks, which indicates that both banks costs are increasing to generate profit. The competitive market
of the banking industry is responsible for it. CBL has good effort to minimize the growth of risk but the
ABL has failed to control the growth. The C/I ratio has been dramatically increased in 2012 and 2013 for
ABL. The global recession, political turbulence and increase in classified loans has affected most to ABL.
Page 35
90%
80%
70%
79%
73%
85%
77%
82%
76%
72%
69%
58%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2009
2010
2011
Agrani Bank
2012
2013
City Bank
From the above chart, it can be seen that CBL is more efficient in providing loans from the collected funds
than ABL. For both banks the ratio increased in 2010 but it declines from 2011. ABLs ratio declined more
than City bank Ltd. As a result the earnings of ABL is lower and but it is more liquid than CBL.
Page 36
64%
61%
55%
58%
50%
48%
45%
40%
2009
2010
2011
ABL
2012
2013
CBL
From the above graph it can be seen that ABL is in better liquid position than CBL. The ratio declined for
both banks from 2011 to 2013. Its because depression in economy discourages banks to provide loans and
advances. The number of defaulters was increasing. To keep stabilize the economy Bangladesh Bank
provided restrictions on providing loans. ABL seems to be in more defensive position in providing loans
than CBL.
Page 37
City Bank
30%
25%
20%
25%
19%
13%
15%
10%
18%
11%
5%
4%
3%
2009
2010
2011
5%
8%
8%
2012
2013
0%
From the above graph it can be seen that the ratio of ABL is very high. The ratio tends to be declined for
both banks from 2009 to 2011 but dramatically increased in 2012. ABL reached its highest ratio in 2012
which is 25%. ABL has significant achievement in reducing the ratio in 2013 where CBL has slight
increase. But the ratio still remains very high for ABL.
Page 38
FINDINGS
Through the ratio analysis, the profitability, efficiency, liquidity and credit performance of ABL and CBL
is measured. The below points are identified in the analysis:
8.2.1 Profitability
ABLs profitability as a SCB is very poor in compared to CBL as PCB. ABL has faced huge losses in
unstable economy but has a great comeback. This indicates that the bank has quality to turn around from
hard situation and increase profitability. Through proper management and strategy ABL has exceeded its
profitability in some extents than CBL.
8.2.2 Efficiency
The gap between ABL and CBL in efficiency was close till 2011. But it dramatically increases in 2012 and
2013. In these two years banking industry was hard hit due to increase in cost of deposit and lending rates.
ABL also recruited excessive employees and lacks to adapt modern technology. These factors influenced
the cost of ABL to generate income.
8.3.3 Liquidity
ABL has better position in liquidity than CBL. But the bank is also loosing income because of not utilizing
more funds. As economic factors and restrictions from Bangladesh Bank influenced the lending of banks,
ABL has put it into more defensive position. CBL has make use of its deposit funds better than ABL and
maintained a standard liquidity position which is in return helping CBL to generate more profit.
Page 39
CONCLUSION
The objective of every business is to earn profit by maintaining a good investment portfolio. For banks the
investments are loan portfolio. The operation of banks is mostly depended on collecting deposits from
customers and providing loans and advances to those who needs funds. Through credit policy, banks
manage their loan portfolio. So it is necessary for banks to find an optimum combination of high income
and low risk. Liquidity is also a major concern as there is conflict between objectives of liquidity and
profitability. So in todays highly competitive banking industry, managing a good loan portfolio is a major
concern for the banks.
As a SCB, ABL operates its operation on the basis of government objectives. A decent percentage of total
loans and advances are provided by the bank. The bank has also substantial accomplishment in collecting
remittances and spreading banking activities through increasing the number of branches. For maintaining
loan portfolio the bank has provided key highlight on agriculture, SME and garments sector as these three
sectors are identified for development of the countrys economy by government. The bank has problem
related to the recovery of its loans. The amount of classified loan is very high in compare to PCB. It indicates
that the banks management is struggling to recover the loans and rescheduling on political influences.
Management was also failed to keep stability in profitability when economic situation was unsuitable and
lower the cost to generate profits. For better performance the bank may consider the following points:
First, the appraisal of loans and advances should be provided more cautiousness so that the bank can
estimate the possibility of becoming classified loan.
Second, Internal and external political influence and corruption in lending should be reduced.
Third, Loan rescheduling should be strict so that the amount of loan classification is reduced.
Fourth, Loan recovery activity should be provided more importance and legal procedure should be taken
if necessary.
Fifth, Increase the use of deposit funds so that bank generate more profit as well as maintain a standard
liquidity.
Sixth, reduce the cost of generating income by proper use of available resources and adapting modern
technology.
Page 40
Page 41
REFERENCES
Documents
1. Annual Reports 2009-2013, (2013). Agrani Bank Ltd. Retrieved from
http://www.agranibank.org/Annual-Report.php
2. Biswas, V., & Mondal, K. (2012). Fund Management Practices of the Selected Nationalized
Commercial Banks in Bangladesh. Asa University Review, 6(1). Retrieved from
http://www.asaub.edu.bd/data/asaubreview/v6n1sl19.pdf
3. BOATENG, O. (2011). OPTIMAL LOAN PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT (A CASE STUDY OF
CAL BANK, NHYIEASO BRANCH - KUMASI . Retrieved from
http://ir.knust.edu.gh/.../1/ONASIS%20BOATENG%20THESIS%202011.pdf
4. City Bank Ltd.,. (2013). Annual Report 2009-2013. Retrieved from
http://www.thecitybank.com/annual_reports.php
5. David, C., & Dionne, C. (2005). Bank's Loan portfolio diversification. Retrieved from
https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/1714/1/0405.41.pdf
6. George, D., Miroga, D., Ngaruiya, N., Mindila, R., Nyakwara, S., & Mobisa, M. et al. (2013).
An Analysis of Loan Portfolio Management on Organization Profitability: Case of Commercial
Banks in Kenya. Research Journal Of Finance And Accounting, 4(8). Retrieved from
http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RJFA/article/view/6691
7. Jahn, N., Memme, C., & Pfingsten, A. (2013). Banks concentration versus diversification in
the loan portfolio: new evidence from Germany. Deutsche Bundesbank. Retrieved from
http://www.bundesbank.de/Redaktion/EN/.../2014_01_13_dkp_53.pdf
8. Loan Portfolio Management. (1998). Retrieved from
http://www.occ.gov/publications/publications-by-type/comptrollers-handbook/lpm.pdf
9. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal Of Finance, 7(1). Retrieved from
https://www.math.ust.hk/~maykwok/courses/ma362/07F/markowitz_JF.pdf
10. Mileris, R. (2012). THE EFFECTS OF MACROECONOMIC CONDITIONS ON LOAN
PORTFOLI O CREDIT RISK AND BANKING SYSTEM INTEREST
INCOME. EKONOMIKA, 91(3). Retrieved from
http://www.vu.lt/leidyba//dokumentai/zurnalai/EKONOMIKA/.../85-100.pdf
Page 42
Page 43
Books
1. Babin, B., Carr, J., Griffin, M., & Zikmund, W. (2012). Business research methods. Eighth Edition.
2. Lind, D., Marchal, W., & Wathen, S. (2005). Statistical techniques in business & economics.
Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Page 44
APPENDIX
Table 9 Five year Performance of ABL
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
Authorized Capital
2,500
2,500
1,000
800
800
Paid-up Capital
2,072
991
901
547
497
Reserves
1,659
1,168
1,168
486
139
58
12
27
90
207
(225)
(1,454)
498
449
74
Total Equity
3,564
717
2,594
1,572
1,144
Total Deposits
34,868
29,243
25,221
20,633
16,628
Core Deposits
10,722
9,932
9,255
8,505
7,357
Particulars
Balance Sheet
i. Savings Deposit
9,524
8,926
8,532
8,013
6,966
88
127
133
131
125
45
71
68
66
136
1,065
808
522
295
130
20,297
21,266
19,409
16,326
12,224
688
735
602
579
691
1,923
3,466
1,235
1,064
1,187
17,686
17,065
17,572
14,683
10,345
Investments (net)
14,566
8,921
8,376
4,264
4,089
Fixed Assets
1,525
1,138
1,123
544
288
Total Assets
44,416
37,872
34,882
26,485
21,406
6,781
4,823
5,859
5,960
4,798
4,113
3,049
3,700
2,693
3,301
1,827
2,402
1,316
1,636
992
1,064
1,007
1,474
1,086
644
133
133
133
133
133
2,738
607
312
185
(216)
(2)
484
289
190
905
(1,862)
250
352
136
91.28
(187.84)
25.22
46.47
24.80
10.41
9.97
7.69
7.42
6.86
25.39
(259.94)
9.64
22.38
53.75
2.04
(4.92)
0.72
1.33
0.63
242
Financial Ratios
3.43
3.83
6.25
14.19
1.61
13.86
11.99
11.19
4.61
11.04
58.21
72.72
76.95
79.13
73.51
Page 45
17.93
25.30
11.07
12.88
19.42
6.81
8.40
3.44
4.69
4.79
972
758
Transport
174
Ship Breaking
115
Garments
1947
Food
550
Construction
175
Pharmaceuticals
345
Leather
380
Power
1119
Housing
638
Wholesale
2833
Personal
2128
Other
7918
2009
2,304
2010
2873
2011
6136
2012
7372
2013
7482
Page 46
2009
74
2010
195
2011
746
2012
1180
2013
1120
Solar Panel
48
Easy Bike
483
Bio Gas
207
1288
2009
8745
2010
12100
2011
11791
2012
12496
2013
14035
Page 47
Crops
257
Fisheries
15
Livestock
11
Poverty Alleviation
143
Others
76
Deposits
Loans
Repayable on demand
3542
437
172
7114
23242
3696
7425
6807
Years
Years
Target
Recovered
2009
2374
2009
1500
749
2010
2102
2010
1660
957
2011
2149
2011
1500
1033
2012
5380
2012
1500
843
2013
3580
2013
2000
2638
Page 48
2012
City bank
2011
2010
2009
352
136
905
-1,862
250
26,485
21,406
44,416
37,872
34,882
2.037554 -4.916561 0.716702 1.329054 0.635336
911
147,472
0.617744385
763
130,186
0.586084525
2,018
115,736
1.743623419
1,849
90,898
2.034148166
819
76,467
1.071050257
905
-1,862
250
352
136
3,564
717
2,594
1,572
1,144
25.39282 -259.6932 9.637625 22.39186 11.88811
911
18,525
4.917678812
763
17,961
4.248093091
2,018
17,856
11.3015233
1,849
11,519
16.0517406
819
5,864
13.96657572
3,049
4,113
74.1308
992
1,636
60.6357
4,749,693,839
8,895,921,395
53.39181438
3,992,865,851
8,560,122,728
46.64496033
17,686
17,065
17,572
14,683
10,345
44,416
37,872
34,882
26,485
21,406
39.81898 45.05967 50.37555 55.43893 48.32757
85,034
147,472
57.66111533
78,753
130,186
60.4926797
2013
Agrani Bank
2012
2011
2010
2009
2,693
1,827
1,316
3,700
3,301
2,402
72.78378 55.34686 54.78768
3,559,814,530 3,200,831,687
7,756,141,753 7,301,070,396
45.89671828 43.84058108
2,112,244,711
4,367,880,343
48.35857544
74,306
115,736
64.20301376
41,979
76,467
54.89819138
58,317
90,898
64.1565271
20,297
21,266
19,409
16,326
12,224
34,868
29,243
25,221
20,633
16,628
58.21097 72.72168 76.95571 79.12567 73.51455
89,879
83,333
107,497
94,099
83.61070542
88.55885822
76,966
60,327
43,486
83,818
67,420
62,384
91.82514496 89.47938297
69.70697615
3639
20297
17.92876
5380
21266
25.2986
2149
2103
2374
19409
16326
12224
11.07218 12.88129 19.42081
7251
89879
8.06751299
6231
83333
7.477229909
2644
76966
3.435283112
2669
60327
4.424221327
Page 49
2117
43486
4.868233454
Adjusted
Square R Square
.741a
.549
-.128
the R Square F
df1
Estimate
Change
Change
1.014E10
.549
.811
df2
Sig.
Change
3
.593
Table 21 Correlations
Correlations
Profit
Loan_portfoli Interest_expe
Operating_co
nse
st
Pearson
Profit
1.000
-.327
-.258
-.129
Correlation
Loan_portfolio
-.327
1.000
.873
.959
Interest_expense
-.258
.873
1.000
.876
Operating_cost
-.129
.959
.876
1.000
Profit
.263
.311
.404
Loan_portfolio
.263
.012
.001
Interest_expense
.311
.012
.011
Operating_cost
.404
.001
.011
Profit
Loan_portfolio
Interest_expense
Operating_cost
Sig. (1-tailed)
Page 50
Model
Sum
of df
Mean Square F
Sig.
.593a
Squares
1
Regression
2.500E20
8.333E19
Residual
2.055E20
1.027E20
Total
4.555E20
.811
Correlations
Covariances
Operating_cost
Interest_expense
Loan_portfolio
Operating_cost
1.000
-.277
-.827
Interest_expense
-.277
1.000
-.243
Loan_portfolio
-.827
-.243
1.000
Operating_cost
90.278
-3.389
-3.061
Interest_expense
-3.389
1.662
-.122
Loan_portfolio
-3.061
-.122
.152
Page 51
Unstandardized Standar
Coefficients
dized
Si
95%
g.
Confidence
Coeffic
Correlations
Collinearity
Statistics
Interval for B
ients
B
Std.
Beta
Low
Upper Ze
Par
Toler
VI
Erro
er
Boun
ro- tial
ar
ance
Bou
or
.075
13.
nd
de
r
1 (Constant
)
1.987E
2.54
.7
.5
1.293
10
3E1
81
8.95
E11
6E1
0
Loan_por
-.545
.390
-2.424
tfolio
.2
1.
40
1.131
2.22
.3
.70
.6
29
27
0
Interest_e
-.353
xpense
1.28
-.277
.8
.2
74
5.194
5.90
.2
.19
.1
58
.220
4.5
53
0
Operating 13.253
9.50
_cost
2.438
1.
.2
54.13
.70
.6
39
27.6
.1
54
28
29
.074
13.
Page 52