Download

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 17 (2013) 207209

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Annals of Diagnostic Pathology

Nonossifying broma developed in metaphysis and epiphysisa case report


Jung Ho Noh, MD, PhD a, Kyung Nam Ryu, MD, PhD b, Ji Yoon Bae, MD c,
Young Hak Roh, MD d,, In Seok Choi, MD e
a

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do 200-722, South Korea
Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
Department of Pathology, National Police Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
d
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, 1198 Kuwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon 405760, South Korea
e
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Police Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
b
c

a r t i c l e
Keywords:
Nonossifying broma
Metaphysis
Epiphysis

i n f o

a b s t r a c t
Nonossifying broma is developed in childhood and adolescence and is usually asymptomatic. It is typically
arises in the metaphysis of long bone and migrates toward the diaphysis with growth. We present a very rare
case of nonossifying broma involving metaphysis and epiphysis of the distal femur in a 20-year-old man.
Nonossifying broma is a benign broblastic lesion, which is also termed benign cortical defect and
broxanthoma. A nonossifying broma rarely causes problems and does not interfere with healing or growth.
The lesions are usually asymptomatic. With growth and remodeling of the bone, the lesion typically
disappears and is replaced with normal bone. However, the lesion may weaken the involved bone, causing
fracture. The lesion typically arises in the metaphysis of long bones and may migrate toward the diaphysis
with growth. There have never been reports of nonossifying broma involving epiphysis that we know of. We
report a very rare case of nonossifying broma involving metaphysis and epiphysis in a young adult. Written,
informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this case report, including the images.
2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

1. Case report
A 20-year-old man visited the authors' hospital because of pain on
the left knee for 4 months. Physical examination revealed that mild
tenderness on the medial side of the knee with no swelling, no
effusion, and no limitation of motion. He did not have any history of
trauma or medical illnesses.
Plain radiographs of the left knee showed well-dened osteolytic
bone destruction at the metaphysis and epiphysis of the distal femur
with thin sclerotic rim. There was no signicant contour change of
cortex (Fig. 1A). On computed tomography (CT), the lesion showed
involvement of distal metaphysis and epiphysis at the medial femoral
condyle. The lesion showed well-dened osteolytic bone destruction
with thin sclerotic rim with minimal expansion of cortex. Most of the
lesion showed osteolytic bone destruction; however, linear and
amorphous bone formations were seen along the periphery of the
lesion. In the proximal portion of the lesion, a focal cortical
discontinuity was seen (Fig. 1B). Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic
resonance imaging was taken. Short TI inversion recovery images
showed well-dened low-signal lesion at the metaphysis and
epiphysis of the distal femur. The ossied areas within lesion on CT

Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 32 460 8916; fax: +82 32 468 5437.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (J.H. Noh), [email protected] (Y.H. Roh).
1092-9134/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2012.07.003

showed dark signal intensities (Fig. 1C). T1 spectral presaturation by


inversion recovery-enhanced images showed diffused high-signal
intensity with contrast enhancement; however, ossied areas within
lesion on CT showed no signicant signal changes. Based on the
radiographic ndings, chondromyxoid roma, nonossifying broma,
enchondroma, chondroblastoma, and brous dysplasia were considered as differential diagnoses.
Curettage and bone graft were performed. Microscopic ndings of
the tumor showed cellular stroma of spindle-shaped broblasts in a
whorled storiform pattern, among which irregularly scattered multinucleated osteoclast-type giant cells were seen (Fig. 2). Collections of
foam cells, with small dark nuclei, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages were frequently present. Scattered inammatory cells, mainly
lymphocytes, were present. Mitotic gures were inconspicuous, and
no nuclear atypia was noted. These features were consistent with the
diagnosis of nonossifying broma.
2. Discussion
Nonossifying broma is a benign lesion occurring most commonly
in the distal femur and proximal and distal tibia [1]. The incidence of
nonossifying broma is 30% to 40% of children 2 to 15 years old, and
male:female ratio is 2:1 [2]. It is typically arises in the metaphysis of
long bone and migrates toward the diaphysis with growth [3]. The
lesions are usually asymptomatic and are discovered incidentally on

208

J.H. Noh et al. / Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 17 (2013) 207209

Fig. 2. Photomicrographs of the lesion. (A) Spindle-shaped broblasts in a whorled


storiform pattern, and collections of foam cells are seen (hematoxylin and eosin, original
magnication 40). (B) Scattered osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells in whorled
broblastic background (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnication 100).

radiographs. On plain radiographs, the lesion is eccentric and multi- or


uniloculated. It is well demarcated with sclerotic rim [4]. The
diagnosis of nonossifying broma can be made with plain radiographs
with an accuracy of 100% [5,6].
Surgery is generally not required because of a high rate of
spontaneous regression and a lack of symptoms [7-10]. Operative
treatment is considered if the lesion is larger than 33 mm and involves
more than 50% of the bone's diameter or if the lesion is not typical to
be diagnosed [2,11]. If an operation is recommended, curettage and
bone graft are the procedures of choice.
The prognosis is excellent. The lesion generally resolves spontaneously, usually at skeletal maturity. Recurrence is rare.
The lesion in this case developed in usual site at uncommon
age, which made the diagnosis difcult. The authors suggest
that the biopsy is necessary for accurate diagnosis of such a case,
Fig. 1. (A) Anteroposterior and lateral views of the left knee show well-dened bone
destruction at the metaphysis and epiphysis of the distal femur. Lesion shows thin
sclerotic rim. (B) Computed tomographic images of the distal femur show well-dened
bone destruction with thin sclerotic rim, and the lesion shows mild expansion of cortex.
Septa-like and amorphous ossications are seen within the lesion. Coronal image of
distal femur shows focal discontinuity of cortex at the superior portion of lesion. (C) T1
spectral presaturation by inversion recovery coronal magnetic resonance image shows
well-dened low-signal lesion at the metaphysis and epiphysis of the distal femur. The
ossied areas within lesion on CT show dark signal intensities.

J.H. Noh et al. / Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 17 (2013) 207209

although most cases of the nonossifying broma can be diagnosed


by plain radiographs.
References
[1] Dormans JP, Pill SG. Fractures through bone cysts: unicameral bone cysts,
aneurysmal bone cysts, brous cortical defects, and nonossifying bromas. Instr
Course Lect 2002;51:457-67.
[2] Betsy M, Kupersmith LM, Springeld DS. Metaphyseal brous defects. J Am Acad
Orthop Surg 2004;12:89-95.
[3] Easley ME, Kneisl JS. Pathologic fractures through nonossifying bromas: is
prophylactic treatment warranted? J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:808-13.
[4] Resnick D, Greenway G. Distal femoral cortical defects, irregularities, and
excavations. Radiology 1982;143:345-54.

209

[5] Schwartz AM, Ramos RM. Neurobromatosis and multiple nonossifying bromas.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980;135:617-9.
[6] Klein MH, Rosenberg ZS, Lehman WB. Nonossifying broma of bone: a case report.
Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 1990;50:64-9.
[7] Cunningham JB, Ackerman LV. Metaphyseal brous defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1956;38-A:797-808.
[8] Drennan DB, Maylahn DJ, Fahey JJ. Fractures through large non-ossifying bromas.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 1974:82-8.
[9] Hatcher CH. The pathogenesis of localized brous lesions in the metaphyses of
long bones. Ann Surg 1945;122:1016-30.
[10] Ritschl P, Karnel F, Hajek P. Fibrous metaphyseal defectsdetermination of their
origin and natural history using a radiomorphological study. Skeletal Radiol
1988;17:815.
[11] Arata MA, Peterson HA, Dahlin DC. Pathological fractures through non-ossifying
bromas. Review of the Mayo Clinic experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:
980-8.

You might also like