Final Hinu Law Project On Adoption
Final Hinu Law Project On Adoption
Final Hinu Law Project On Adoption
Submitted By,
Shubham Patel
Neha Tiwari
Subject,
Role of Adoption under Hindu Law
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am deeply indebted to Sir Pankaj Umberkar, Asst. Professor, MATS Law School, MATS
University, Raipur for constantly guiding and encouraging us to undertake and complete this
project. We are thankful for his patient disposition.
I am also thankful to Dr G.P. Tripathi, Director, and all other staff of the MATS Law School,
MATS University, Raipur for giving me opportunity and facility to complete this work.
Shubham Patel
Neha Tiwari
3rd Semester, B.B.A-LLB
Table Of Contents
Introduction
Historical Perspective
Important features
Requisites of a Valid Adoption
Capacity of a male Hindu to take in adoption
Capacity of a female Hindu to take in adoption
Persons capacity of giving in adoption
Person who may be adopted
Other condition for adoption
Effect of adoption
Right of adoptive parents to dispose of their properties
Determination of adoptive mother in certain cases
Valid adoption not to be cancelled
Presumption as to registered documents relating to adoption
Prohibition of certain payments
Introduction
3
Historical Perspective
Since the Vedic period, Hindu society has given a lot of importance to male child. It was said that
a male child saves the father from 'put' hell; hence the male child is called Putra. This was the
main reason which has prompted the son-less to adopt a male child.
Manusmriti says that when the natural father and mother give wholeheartedly their son with the
offering of water to another person in distress, it is called Dattak.
Vashistha has given several guidelines on dattak. It says that the father and the mother of an
offspring have complete right on selling or giving the offspring to another. A Dattak cannot be
taken from the person who has only one son. A child whose kinsmen are not known cannot be
taken as dattak. A woman had no right to adopt.
Sounaka has said metaphorically that a Dattak son must be a reflection of the father, which
means that a Dattak can only be taken from a mother whom the person could have married
before her marriage. Thus, one could not adopt daughter's son, sister's son, or mother's sister's
son.
Thus, the practice of Dattak in the old days had been practiced mostly for religious reasons. This
is also evident from the fact that only a male child was to be adopted because only he can
perform the religious duties for the father. Slowly, the secular reasons such as continuance of the
family name also became important. More recently, ulterior motives such as changing the course
of inheritance of property has also prompted people to adopt.
Based on the above three authors and many other customs, the Dattak ceremony primarily
involved a Dattakgrahan, i.e. the actual giving and taking of the child and a Dattakhomam.
However, there were several controversies because there was no one standard rule. So, in 1956,
the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act was enforced which standardized as well as
modernized the rules and process for adoption.
Adoption
4
4. The child must be less than 15 yrs of age. However, if a custom to the contrary exists,
such an adoption may take place.
.
Effects of Adoption
Section 12- says that an adopted child is deemed to be a natural child of his adopted parents
for all purposes. All relations with the natural parents and family are severed and new
relationships with the adopted parents are established. Only exception is that the adopted child
cannot marry anybody from his natural family.
It further says that the adopted child is not divested of his property that has vested in him before
adoption and that an adopted child cannot divest anybody of his vested property after adoption.
An important change from the old law here is that the concept of "relating back", which means
that when a widow adopts a child the adoption is7considered to be done from the date the
husband died, has been abolished. However, in the case of Sawan Ram vsKalawati AIR 1967,
SC has held that the deceased father is sill considered the adoptive father.
Section 13- says that subject to any ante-adoption agreement, the adoptive parents do not lose
their right of alienation of their property after adoption.
Section 15- says that a valid adoption cannot be canceled either by the adoptive father or
mother. Neither can the adopted child renounce the adoptive parents and go back to the family of
his birth.
Section 16- says that whenever any document made under any law in force at the time,
purporting to record an adoption, and has been signed by the giver and taker of the child, is
produced before the court, the court shall presume that the adoption has been made in accordance
with the provisions of this act unless and until it is disproved.
In the case of Pentakota Satyanarayana vs Pentakota Seetharatham AIR 2005 SC, the
plaintiff brought a suit for partition and possession. However, he failed to provide any proof of
the adoption. His adoptive father was estranged 8
from adoptive mother and the adoptive mother
had asked for maintenance for herself but not for the adoptive son. There was no document or
agreement. The plaintiff could not provide any essential details such as date of adoption or fixing
of Muhurtam etc. Thus, SC held that there was no adoption and the alleged adopted son had no
right in the property.
Section 17- (1) forbids receipt of any payment as a consideration for the adoption
(2) If any such payment is taken, he shall be punishable by 6 months imprisonment and/or a
fine or both.
(3) No prosecution under this section shall be instituted without the previous sanction of the
state government or an officer authorized by the state government in this behalf.
Bibiography
Website:
www.Google .com
Books Referred:
Hindu laws BARE ACT
Hindu laws Paras diwan
10