The Phone Charger Conundrum: Provided by Tryengineering
The Phone Charger Conundrum: Provided by Tryengineering
The Phone Charger Conundrum: Provided by Tryengineering
Conundrum
Provided by TryEngineering - www.tryengineering.org
Lesson Focus
Lesson focuses on how technical standards are developed and demonstrates how
standards enable products to work together.
Lesson Synopsis
Teams of students will develop models of wireless phone chargers that are compatible
with other teams mobile device designs.
Age Levels
12-18
Objectives
Lesson Activities
Student teams learn how engineers work together to develop products that are
compatible with other products.
Resources/Materials
Teacher Resource Documents (attached)
Student Worksheets (attached)
Student Resource Sheets (attached)
Internet Connections
IEEE Standards Association (http://standards.ieee.org)
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) (www.standardslearn.org)
The Phone Charger Conundrum
Developed by IEEE as part of TryEngineering
www.tryengineering.org
Page 1 of 9
Credits
Page 2 of 9
Materials
Plastic forks, writing paper, pencils, cardstock, construction paper, clear tape, glue
sticks, scissors, markers, crayons, plastic wrap, aluminum foil, rulers, protractors
Procedure
1. Show students two different devices that are not compatible (such as an iPhone and
a Blackberry charger). Invite two students to come up in front of the class and try
to charge the phone with the charger.
- Ask students why they think the phone and charger dont work together, and
what they think the solution is.
- Invite students to share other examples of products that need to work
together.
2. Review background material on standards as provided in the Student Resource
sheets.
3. Divide students into teams of two to three.
4. Share with students that a brand new wireless phone charger known as the
PowerFork has recently been developed. They have been selected to help develop
the standard that will outline what is required for a phone to be compatible with the
PowerFork.
5. Provide each team with a PowerFork (one plastic fork), so they can document its
properties (shape, size, appearance etc.). As additional option, as a class you can
come to a consensus on modifications to the PowerFork such as breaking off one or
more of the tines before documenting its properties.
6. As a class, develop a standard explaining what is required to create a mobile phone
that successfully plugs into the PowerFork. (e.g. how many holes does it need, how
deep do the holes need to be, what is their diameter, how far apart must they be,
are the holes straight or at an angle, are there any concerns regarding temperature
since the PowerFork is plastic?)
7. Challenge each team of engineers to design a smart phone prototype out of the
materials provided, that will be compatible with the PowerFork phone charger
(based on the standard they developed).
8. When students have completed their designs, they can test compatibility with the
PowerForks, tweaking as needed.
9. Students can then present their designs and test results to the class.
10.If you wish to evaluate students designs, you can rate each teams design on a
scale of 1-5 using each of the following criteria: original design, compatible design,
and creativity
Time Needed
One to two 45 minute sessions
The Phone Charger Conundrum
Developed by IEEE as part of TryEngineering
www.tryengineering.org
Page 3 of 9
Page 4 of 9
Using the example of the electrical outlets above, why do you think there might be
standards at a national or regional level, but not on a global level? One aspect
might be that there are trade barriers that protect local markets for appliances.
Page 5 of 9
Page 6 of 9
Phase
Build your phone and test it to see if it plugs into the PowerFork perfectly. If yes, go to
other teams and test whether it fits with their PowerFork.
Presentation and Measurement
Present your mobile phone design and the results of your testing to the class.
Evaluation
Complete the evaluation questions below:
1. How similar was your design to the actual mobile phone you built?
2. Were you able to design a phone that was compatible with the PowerFork? Was it
compatible with other teams PowerForks?
3. Did it work the first time, or did you need to make any modifications? Describe why
your team decided to make revisions.
4. What was special or different about your phone, which in your opinion, made it
better than others?
5. What is one thing you have learned about standards after participating in this
activity?
Page 7 of 9
Page 8 of 9
Engineering Design
3-5-ETS1-3.Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and
failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that
can be improved.
Page 9 of 9