Mangrove Atlas of Andhra Pradesh Province India PDF
Mangrove Atlas of Andhra Pradesh Province India PDF
Mangrove Atlas of Andhra Pradesh Province India PDF
MANGROVE WETLANDS
OF INDIA
T. Ravishankar
L. Gnanappazham
R. Ramasubramanian
D. Sridhar
M. Navamuniyammal
V. Selvam
Fax
: [email protected]
[email protected]
MSSRF/MG/03/15
March 2004
This Atlas was prepared with the generous support of the India-Canada Environment Facility, New Delhi, through
the project Coastal Wetlands: Mangrove Conservation and Management.
FOREWORD
The multi-functionality of mangrove ecosystems is now widely recognized. They serve
as barriers to coastal storms, conservers of soil, supporters of sustainable fisheries,
providers of medical products and fuel wood and fodder, habitats of wide range of flora
and fauna, sources of genes for sea water tolerance and above all as the flagship of natures
ecological security system in coastal estuaries. MSSRF with support from the India - Canada
Environment Facility, has been engaged in fostering the sustainable management of
mangrove wetlands in the states of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa and West Bengal
during the last 6 years. This project has yielded valuable results on the quantitative and qualitative aspects of mangrove
wetlands with particular reference to the impact of anthropogenic pressures on the ecosystem on the one hand, and the
benefits arising from ecorestoration and mangrove rehabilitation programmes on the other. The data have been compiled
in the form of GIS maps which have formed the basis for a series of Atlases. The first Atlas of Mangrove wetlands of
Tamil Nadu was published in 2002. The present Atlas gives detailed information on the mangrove wetlands of both
Godavari and Krishna river basins of Andhra Pradesh. The Atlases have been designed as tools for public policy and
public action. I hope this atlas will be used to not only conserve the unique mangrove wetlands of Andhra Pradesh but
also to enhance their coverage and beneficial social, spiritual, environmental and economic impact.
I am grateful to all listed in the acknowledgements for their invaluable help and advice, but for which this work could
not have been done. I also express my gratitude to Dr. T. Ravishankar, L. Gnanappazham, R. Ramasubramanian,
D. Sridhar, M. Navamuniyammal and Dr. V. Selvam for their hard and dedicated work, which has opened up a new era of
hope in the history of the conservation and sustainable and equitable use of the mangrove wetlands of Andhra Pradesh.
Chennai
December 2003
M. S. Swaminathan
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are grateful to the Forest Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, for providing facilities for data collection
and ground truthing.
We would like to express our thanks to
Mr S. K. Das, I.F.S,. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests; Mr . K. Subba Rao, IFS; and Mr . S. D. Mukherjee
IFS, former Principal Chief Conservators of Forests;
Mr T. Ramakrishna, IFS; Mr. J. V. K. T. Prabakar Rao, IFS, Mr. Manoranjan Bhanja, IFS, Conservators of
Forests.
Mr. K. Ravi Kumar, IFS., Mr. K. Prakasha Rao and Mr. Thatha Rao Deputy Conservators of Forests.
Mr. C. V. Satyanarayana, Shri. M. V. V. Satyanarayana, and Mr. Mallikarjuna Rao, Forest Range Officers, and the
staff of Coringa and Krishna Wildlife Sanctuary
Dr. H M. Kasim and Dr. R. Narayanakumar, Scientists, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI)
Mr. Venkatesh Salagrama, Integrated Coastal Management, Kakinada for their help.
We are grateful to Prof. M.S.Swaminathan, Chairman, MSSRF, for his encouragement, guidance and support in the
preparation of this Atlas. We would like to thank Dr. M. Velayutham, Executive Director, MSSRF, for his guidance and
support, Prof P. C. Kesavan, Former Executive Director, MSSRF for his support in preparing this Atlas. Mr. S.
Krishnakumar and Mr. N. Veerabadrarao, MSSRF, for their valuable contributions in the preparation of maps. The
advice and encouragement by Dr. L. R. A. Narayan, Distinguished Fellow, MSSRF, is gratefully acknowledged.
Our thanks are due to Mr. Allen Ferguson and Mr. Bernard Boudreau, former Directors, of the India-Canada
Environment Facility (ICEF), New Delhi; Shri. Ujjwal Choudary, Director, ICEF, Dr. Jaya Chatterji, Senior Project
Officer, ICEF; and members of the Joint Project Steering Committee of ICEF, the Project Management Committee,
the State Guidance Committee and the Joint Working Groups of the Project for their encouragement and continued
support.
We are thankful to Dr. Shailash Nayak, Space Application Centre, Ahmadabad; Dr. C. B. S. Dutt, Scientist, National
Remote Sensing Agency; Dr. B. R. Subramaniam, Director, Integrated Coastal and Marine Area Management Programme,
Department of Ocean Development, Government of India.
We thank the fishers and farmers of eight village level institutions, Mandal officials, Village Sarpanchs of Krishna
and Godavari mangrove areas for their active participation.
CONTRIBUTORS
M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
Dr. T. Ravishankar
Dr. R. Ramasubramanian
Mangrove Ecologist
Ms. L. Gnanappazham
GIS Specialist
Ms. M. Navamuniyammal
GIS Specialist
Dr. D. Sridhar
Mangrove Ecologist
Social Scientist
Mr. S. Sankaramurthy
Prof. S. Chelliah
Mr. K. Johnson
Mr. D. Ramakrishna
Former Hydrogeologist
Mr. M. M. Jeelani
Former Agronomist
Former Agronomist
Dr. R. Krishnamurthy
Conservator of Forests
Conservator of Forests
Additional PCCF
Conservator of Forests
State Silviculurist
vii
CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
iv
CONTRIBUTORS
1.
Introduction
1.1
Distribution of Mangroves
1.2
Mangroves of India
2.
2.1.
2.2.
2.3
2.4
12
17
3.1.
Geomorphology
17
3.2.
17
3.3
Reserve Forests
20
3.4
21
3.5.
27
3.6.
Soil properties
30
3.7.
Hydrological conditions
30
3.8.
39
3.9.
Socio-economic condition
43
3.10.
Live stock
53
3.11.
56
3.12
Dependency
60
3.13.
67
3.14.
68
3.15.
69
ix
Page
3.16.
72
3.17.
74
3.18.
74
3.19.
Shoreline changes
77
4.
81
4.1.
Geomorphology
81
4.2.
81
4.3.
Reserve forests
84
4.4.
92
4.5.
Soil properties
92
4.6.
Hydrological conditions
92
4.7.
98
4.8.
Socio-economic condition
100
4.9.
Land use
112
4.10.
Dependency
116
4.11
Causes of degradation
120
4.12.
122
4.13
123
4.14.
125
4.15.
127
4.16
Shoreline changes
127
5.
131
REFERENCES
136
MAPS
Page
Map 1.1
Map 2.1
Map 2.2
Map 2.3
10
Map 2.4
River Godavari
11
Map 2.5
13
Map 2.6
River Krishna
14
Geomorphology
16
Map 3.2
18
Map 3.3
19
Map 3.4
Reserve Forest
23
Map 3.5a
28
Map 3.5b
29
Map 3.6
Soil Salinity
31
Map 3.7
Soil pH
32
Map 3.8
Soil Phosphorus
33
Map 3.9
Tidal Amplitude
34
Map 3.10
Water Salinity
35
Map 3.11
Water Temperature
36
Map 3.12
37
Map 3.13
38
Map 3.14
40
Map 3.15
45
Map 3.16a
46
Map 3.16b
47
Map 3.17a
48
xi
Map 3.17b
49
Map 3.18
Infrastructure
51
Map 3.19
Income Range
52
Map 3.20a
54
Map 3.20b
55
Map 3.21a
57
Map 3.21b
58
Map 3.21c
59
Map 3.22a
62
Map 3.22b
63
Map 3.22c
66
Map 3.23
73
Map 3.24
75
Map 3.25
76
Map 3.26
Shoreline changes
78
Map 3.27
79
Geomorphology
80
Map 4.2
82
Map 4.3
83
Map 4.4
Reserve Forest
86
Map 4.5a
90
Map 4.5b
91
Map 4.6
Soil pH
93
Map 4.7
Soil Phosphorous
94
Map 4.8
Tidal Amplitude
95
Map 4.9
Water Salinity
96
Map 4.10
Water Temperature
97
Map 4.11
102
xii
Map 4.12a
104
Map 4.12b
105
Map 4.13a
106
Map 4.13b
107
Map 4.14
Infrastructure
108
Map 4.15
109
Map 4.16a
110
Map 4.16b
111
Map 4.17a
113
Map 4.17b
114
Map 4.17c
115
Map 4.18a
118
Map 4.18b
119
Map 4.19
124
Map 4.20
126
Map 4.21
128
Map 4.22
Shoreline changes
129
TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
20
Table 5
Particulars of Fishing Craft and Fish landing near Coringa Mangroves (2001-2002)
41
Table 6
44
Table 7
71
Table 8
74
Table 9
101
Table 10
123
xiii
ABBREVIATION
EDC
Eco-Development Committee
RRA
PRA
MSSRF
MMU
JMM
JFM
FD
Forest Department
VSS
RF
Reserve Forest
VLI
IRS
LISS
TM
Thematic Mapper
IUCN
FSI
xiv
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
angroves are plants that occur along the inter- tidal zones of tropical and subtropical areas between 32o N and
38o S, mostly on the eastern coast of continents. Mangrove forests cover the areas between low and high
water levels. The plant communities of the mangrove wetlands are able to survive in estuarine conditions and
adapt to the environment through unique characteristics stilt roots, viviparous seeds, salt glands, salt-excluding mechanism,
thick cuticles (wax coated leaf surfaces), leathery leaves and pneumatophores (roots for breathing).
They perform many protective, productive and economic functions. Mangrove forests near estuarine areas act as a
barrier against cyclones and mitigate their effects. They prevent storm water from entering the mainland and prevent soil
erosion along the coastal areas. Mangrove wetlands serve as spawning and nursery grounds for many economically
important estuarine/marine fishes and shellfishes; their impact on ecology is equally significant: they harbour many
resident and migratory birds.
Though the mangrove ecosystem is highly productive and has multiple uses, mangroves suffered serious neglect till
very recently. They are undergoing widespread degradation due to a combination of physical, biological, anthropogenic
and social factors. Human-induced stresses and factors - such as unscientific management practices, changes in water
quality, soil salinity, diversion of fresh water upstream, and conversion of mangrove wetlands for aquaculture, salt pans
and other land use practices have reduced mangrove vegetation. The reduction in fresh water flow into the mangrove
ecosystem has generated conditions of hypersalinity, and reduced the transportation of sediments that would create new
areas for mangrove extension. Species diversity is declining with the increase in salinity; this is manifest from the extinction
of many low saline tolerant mangrove species. Mangrove wetlands have also been degraded by indiscriminate destruction
of mangrove resources and clear-felling of mangrove forest. Recently, unsustainable collection of prawn seeds for
supply to aqua farms has affected prawn and fishery resources in mangrove wetlands. Result: fishery recruitment levels
have fallen, and the livelihoods of local fishermen have been affected.
World Mangrove
Atlas 1997
IUCN (1983)
Fisher and
Spalding (1993)
75,173
51,766
76,226
Australasia
18,789
16,980
15,145
The Americas
49,096
67,446
51,286
West Africa
27,995
27,110
49,500
10,024
5,508
6,661
181,077
168,810
198,818
Total
State
Place
1.
Tamil Nadu
Muthupet
12
2.
Tamil Nadu
Pichavaram
3.
Andhra Pradesh
Krishna
156
4.
Andhra Pradesh
Godavari
241
5.
Orissa
Devi mouth
10
6.
Orissa
205
7.
West Bengal
Sundarbans
8.
Gujarat
Gulf of Kutchch
994
9.
Gujarat
Gulf of Kambat
32
10.
Maharashtra
Mumbai
96
11.
Maharashtra
Ratnagiri
12
12.
Goa
Goa
13.
Karnataka
Karwar
14.
Nicobar
37
15.
Andaman
929
Total
2,125
4,866
CHAPTER 2
ndhra Pradesh has a geographical area of 2,76,000 sq.km, of which 63,770 sq.km. or 23% is under forests.
Mangrove forests account for only 582 sq.km, representing only about 0.9% of the States total forest area. An
advantage Andhra Pradesh enjoys is that most of the east- flowing rivers in the heart of the state bring in
copious supplies to the coast from the Western and Eastern Ghats and the Deccan Plateau. Some 40 major, medium and
minor rivers flow through the State. Of these, the most important rivers are the Godavari, the Krishna, the Pennar and
the Vamsadhara. Mangroves are found in the estuaries of these rivers but extensive mangrove wetlands are present only
in the Godavari and Krishna deltaic regions. The Godavari mangroves are located in the Godavari estuary of East
Godavari district and the Krishna mangroves on the Krishna estuary of Krishna and Guntur districts. Apart from
these estuaries, mangroves are also found in small patches along the coasts of Vishakapatnam, West Godavari, Guntur
and Prakasam districts.
Telugu
Name
Habit
Status
True mangroves
1.
Guggilam
Tree
Abundant
2.
Elava mada
Tree
3.
Thella mada
Tree
Common
4.
A. officinalis L. AVICENNIACEAE
Nalla mada
Tree
Common
5.
Urudu
Tree
6.
Kandriga
Tree
Less frequent
7.
Thogara
Tree
Common
8.
Thilla
Tree
9.
Thanduga
Tree
S.No.
Telugu
Name
Habit
Status
10.
Ponna
Tree
Abundant
11.
Ponna
Tree
Less common
12.
Narathanduga
Tree
13.
Pedha Kalinga
Tree
Rare
14.
Kalinga
Tree
Common
15.
Senuga
Tree
16.
Senuga
Tree
Rare
Allchi
Shrub
Herb
Mangrove Associates
17.
18.
19.
Rakkisi
Vine
20.
Pisingi
Tree
Common
21.
Chillinga
Shrub
22.
Nalla theega
Vine
23.
Herb
24.
Attaka nara
Tree
25.
Vine
26.
Thellateega
Vine
27.
Dhabba gaddi
Herb
28.
Yelugaddi
Herb
29.
Herb
30.
Balaboddi theega
theega
Vine
Common
31.
Herb
32.
Elakura
Herb
33.
Elakura
Herb
34.
Palivelu
Tree
Only in Rathikalava RF
35.
Ganguravi
Tree
MALVACEAE
11
Discharge of Godavari Water into the Mangroves
Data on water discharge at the Dowleswaram barrage, obtained for the period 1969-1998, revealed that there is no
significant variation in the discharge. However, monthly discharge data showed that the peak flow was during the
southwest monsoon, because most of the catchment area receives rain then. The discharge starts declining during the
northeast monsoon; in summer, the discharge is almost negligible.
12
The Krishna
The Krishna is the second largest river in Andhra Pradesh. It originates from the mouth of a cow-icon in the ancient
temple of Mahadev in Mahabaleshwar. From Mahableshwar into the Bay of Bengal is a 1,401 km journey. The river
flows 780 km in Maharashtra before entering Andhra Pradesh. Its main tributaries are Koyna, Bhima, Ghataprabha,
Mallaprabha, Tungabhadra, Yerla, Warna and Dudhganga. The river gets most of its water from the Western Ghats. The
catchment area of the river is 2,58,948 sq. km, of which 29.45% is in Andhra Pradesh. The river flows through the
districts of Satara, Sangli and Kohlapur in Maharashtra, Raichur and Gulbarga districts of Karnataka and Mahbubnagar,
Nalgonda, Krishna and Guntur districts of Andhra Pradesh. The Krishna delta isnt as big as the Godavari delta; it
bifurcates into the Nadimeru and Gollamattapaya very near the Krishnas mouth. As indicated in figure 1 average annual
discharge from Krishna river is declining gradually.
Discharge (cusec)
Surface water in the basin used at present is 50.0 km3in volume. Live storage capacity in the basin has increased
significantly since independence. From just about 3.2 km3 in the pre-plan period, the total live storage capacity of the
completed projects has increased to 34.5 km3. Substantial additional storage of over 4.9 km3 would be created on
completion of projects under construction. A further 0.1 km3 of storage would become available when projects now
being considered are taken up and implemented. This has resulted in considerable decrease in fresh water flowing into
the mangroves. (Figure 1.)
15
The Pennar
The Pennar, also known as Uttara Pinakini, enters Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh after traversing 40 km from
the Nandidurg hills of Mysore. Confluence into the Bay of Bengal occurs 29 km north of Nellore. The important
tributaries of the Pennar are Jayamangali, Chitravati, Kunderu, Papagni, Sagileru, Cheyyuru, Boggeru and Biraperu.
The Vamsadhara
The Vamsadhara is the biggest of the river systems flowing from the Eastern Ghats into Bay of Bengal, and traverses
mostly through Srikakulam district. Originating in Orissa, it runs through the Pulbani and Rayagada districts of Orissa
and the Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh for 250 km. Its catchment area is 41,400 sq.km.
Rainfall
The rainfall in Andhra Pradesh is influenced by both the southwest and northeast monsoons. The southwest monsoon
(June-September) provides the bulk of rainfall (68.5%), while the northeast monsoon of October-December accounts
for 22.3%. The rest (9.2%) of the rainfall is received during winter and summer months. The influence of the southwest
monsoon (602.26 mm) is predominant in coastal Andhra Pradesh; the northeast monsoon here provides 316.8 mm of
rainfall. In the East Godavari district, the average total rainfall is about 1,160 mm (Figure 2). Average maximum and
minimum temperatures recorded in Kakinada are 32.36 C and 24.4 C respectively.
This region has a tropical humid climate with the monsoon season commencing in June and extending up to December.
The area receives a copious supply of freshwater during the southwest and northeast monsoons. Salinity during this
period is very low (~5 ppt). From January, the weather is mainly dry and there is a steady progression in heat till the
summer months (March to May).
Figure 2. Rainfall (mm) and the number of rainy days in Tallarevu mandal, East Godavari district, 1998 - 2002
1 - 9 Reserve Forests
CHAPTER 3
Hope
Island
Kakinada
Kakinada
Bay
Mangroves
Agriculture
Godavari River
Bay of
Bengal
Map 3.3 IRS 1D LISS III Remote Sensing Imagery of Godavari delta 2001
Hope
Island
Kakinada
Kakinada
Bay
Mangroves
Agriculture
Aquaculture
Bay of
Bengal
Godavari River
20
Figure 3. Dense mangroves along Corangi river seen as bright red in Remote Sensing Imagery
4272
18808
1015
Rathikaluva
1762
Balusitippa
1300
Matlatippa
389
Masanitippa
546
Kottapalem
66
Kandikuppa
3984
Corangi extension
Bhairavapalem
21
22
RF : Reserve Forest
24
Xylocarpus moluccensis, Sonneratia apetala, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and B. cylindrica are seen along the creeks. Other species such
as - Derris trifoliata, Sarcolobus carinatus, Clerodendrum inerme and Dalbergia spinosa have also been recorded. The soil of this
RF is clayey near the Gaderu river, and sandy clay near the seaside. Suaeda spp. is noticed in degraded areas.
In Rathikalava RF Rhizophora apiculata, R. mucronata, Xylocarpus moluccensis, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Avicennia marina, A.
officinalis and Excoecaria agallocha are the species that occur. Trees of Rhizophora and Bruguiera are seen along the creeks.
Rhizophora trees are about 4 - 6m in height. Large trees of Avicennia officinalis are found in the RF. Tamarix troupii, a
mangrove associate, is recorded in this RF along with Thespesia populneoides. Hibiscus tiliaceus, Clerodendrum inerme, Suaeda
spp. and Salicornia brachiata occur in degraded areas. Also observed in degraded areas is stunted growth of Excoecaria
agallocha and Lumnitzera racemosa and Prosopis invasion along the Saleru canal.
In Masanitippa RF tall trees about 5m in height of Rhizophora apiculata and R. mucronata are seen along the creeks.
Avicennia marina, Excoecaria agallocha are the dominant species in this RF. Sonneratia apetala, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Ceriops
decandra, Lumnitzera racemosa and Bruguiera cylindrica are also recorded in this RF. Large areas of mangroves are found to
occur outside the RF on the Bay of Bengal side, which faces severe erosion due to oceanic currents and tidal action.
Prosopis is also noticed in this area.
In Matlatippa RF fairly dense vegetation is found on the eastern side. The western side is elevated; further, there are
no creeks to supply tidal water. Hence a large area on this side is degraded. The Forest Department has restored these
areas. Species such as Sonneratia apetala, Rhizophora apiculata, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Avicennia marina, Avicennia officinalis,
Avicennia alba, Lumnitzera racemosa, Ceriops decandra and Xylocarpus moluccensis have been recorded in this RF. Also recorded
climbers like Derris trifoliata and Sarcolobus carinatus; grasses such as Porteresia coarctata and Myriostachya wightiana; and
shrubs like Dalbergia spinosa and Acanthus ilicifolius.
In Balusutippa RF large trees of Avicennia officinalis have been recorded. Some other species like Avicennia marina,
Rhizophora apiculata, R. mucronata, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Xylocarpus moluccensis and Ceriops decandra have also been recorded.
The vegetation is fairly dense in Kothapalem RF. Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea Gaertn. F (RUBIACEAE) a rare and endemic
25
26
27
Figure 10. Zonation near Kakinada bay shows newly accreted mud, mudflat occupied by Porteresia coarctata and Avicennia alba
Aegiceras
Corniculatum
Aegiceras
Corniculatum
30
Salinity (ppt)
Phosphorus
( g/gm)
(in ppt)
Salinity (ppt)
Temperature (c)
Temperature (c)
Salinity (ppt)
39
41
Table 5 Particulars of Fishing Craft and Fish landing near Coringa Mangroves (2001 2002)
Village
Pagadalapeta
Cholangi bridge
No of boats
Fish landing
in tonnes
582
1972.3
55
108.5
Uppulanka
Chollangipeta
Matlapalem
Kotturu
Ramanapalem
Ramanapalem
410
1024.15
Peddavalasala
350
370.5
Gadimoga
210
997.1
1607
4472.55
42
43
44
Table 6 Mangrove user villages in Godavari
Village Name
Bhairavalanka
Gogullanka
Kobbarichettupeta
Matlapalem
Ramannapalem
Chinna Boddu Venkatayapalem
Pedda Boddu Venkatayapalem
Chinnavalasala
Pedavalasala
Gadimoga
Bhairavapalem
Dindu
Gopalapuram
Kothapalem
Uppulanka
Babanagar
Chakilitippa
Pandi
Pora
Pagadalapeta
Dariyalatippa
Gollakompalu
Polekurru
Savitrinagar (UTPond
Masanitippa
Balusitippa
Molletimogga
Chollangi
Gerampeta
Ragavendrapuram
Chollangipeta
Rayameraka
Mallavaram
Kotturu
Corangi
Laxmipathipuram
Surachirrayanam
Seetharampuram
Tallarevu
Total
Population
House
holds
Livestock
500
1500
2000
1500
1500
1500
1000
1500
1500
2500
4000
300
1000
1000
2000
1000
2000
1500
2000
2500
2000
1000
5000
1500
2500
2500
2000
3400
2000
750
2500
1000
4000
750
2700
1500
2000
2000
8000
65
250
280
185
200
195
150
150
165
350
325
50
150
150
300
160
250
300
250
350
290
150
325
280
300
310
275
400
300
165
380
136
300
150
450
300
250
225
1000
60
120
500
100
50
75
75
70
30
140
160
70
30
200
30
30
100
80
110
70
75
380
750
75
75
90
60
700
40
30
1200
400
700
40
300
40
110
300
1200
79400
10261
8665
Occupation
Fishing Agriculture
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Dependency
Fuel
House
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
None
None
Grazing
Medium
Medium
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Low
Medium
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
High
High
High
None
None
None
None
Medium
Medium
50
Infrastructure
Most of the villages are well-connected by road. Almost all of them are equipped with cyclone shelters, primary
schools, and post offices. Corangi has a police station, Forest Department guest house and engineering college. A high
school, junior college, bank, primary health center and mandal (administrative office) are found in Tallarevu. Two
lighthouses one at Kakinada and another near Kothapalem are active, an abandoned lighthouse is found near Gaderu
river mouth. An FD guest house is located in the Kandikuppa Reserved Forest near Kothapalem lighthouse (Map 3.18).
Income
The RRA conducted in Mangrove user villages indicate in general, that incomes in the Godavari mangrove area range
from Rs. 6,000 to 18,000 per year. Incomes of entire families in Bhairavalanka village range from Rs.6,000 to Rs.12,000
per year. In Matlapalem, 14 families have incomes ranging between Rs.18,000 and Rs.24, 000; 18 families earn between
Rs 12,000 and Rs. 18,000 and other 18 Families earn below Rs. 12,000. In Dindu, 46 families earn between Rs.6,000 and
Rs.12,000 and four families between Rs.12,000 and Rs.18,000. In Kobbarichettupeta, 79 families earn between Rs.12,000
and Rs.18,000 (Map 3.19).
53
3.10. Livestock
The farming community (Yadavas) in Chollangipeta, Ravimeraka, Polekurru, Mallavaram and Tallarevu use the
mangrove forest for cattle grazing. Nearly 2,000 feral cattle, which are semi-domesticated, remain in the forest for the
most part of the year (Map 3.20a and b). The people milk the cattle and bring in the milk once a day by boat. In summer
they take fresh water for the animals from outside. Chopping of mangrove twigs for stall-feeding cattle and goat grazing
are the other use of mangroves as fodder. Goats from nearby villages also graze in fringe areas. In the user villages nearly
8,665 livestock graze in agricultural fields in the fallow seasons and are stall-fed during the cropping seasons.
56
Dense Mangroves
Degraded Mangroves
Mudflat
Agriculture
Sand
Salt pan
Dense Mangroves
Degraded Mangroves
Mudflat
Agriculture
Sand
Casuarina
Aquaculture/Salt pan
Dense Mangroves
Degraded Mangroves
Mudflat
Agriculture
Sand
Casuarina
Aquaculture/Salt pan
60
Aquaculture
In Andhra Pradesh, the extent of aqua farms has increased from 6000 ha in 1990 to 84,629 ha in 1999. Near to
Godavari estuarine region alone, area of aqua farms has increased from 2006 ha in 1989 to 19239 ha in 1999 (Andhra
Pradesh Remote Sensing Centre, 1999). A recent survey by the aquaculture sector found that about 5% of the shrimp
farms in India have been constructed in former mangrove areas. (ADB/NACA, 1998). Mangrove conversion for prawn
farming has been taken both for small scale extensive system as well as for large scale semi-intensive method of farming.
In the Godavari delta, about 14% of the aquaculture farms have been constructed on mangrove lands located outside
the reserve forests. Most of the lands owned by private abutting the mangroves are being converted to shrimp ponds.
The rate of conversion of mangrove to shrimp ponds increased in the period 1997 to 1999. The increase in shrimp
farming area led to an increase in shrimp production from 30,000 tones during 1990 to 102,000 tones in 1999. Shrimp
farms are located very close to mangroves and revenue lands. Impact of discharge of effluents from aqua farms into
mangrove wetlands has not been studied systematically. The study by Rangarao et al (2003) indicate that pollutants
including effluents released from the aqua farms into mangrove canals are not flushed out completely due to existing
water circulation pattern and tend to accumulate in the southern part bay where mangroves are located.
3.12. Dependency
Grazing
The farming community in Chollangipeta, Ravimeraka, Polekurru, Mallavaram and Tallarevu depend on the mangrove
forests for feral cattle grazing. Apart from this, Porteresia grass and Avicennia twigs are used as fodder for stall-feeding the
livestock. Goats from the nearby villages graze along the fringes of mangroves (Map 3.22a and b).
61
Firewood
Almost all villages depend on mangroves for firewood. However, the degree of dependency is high in fishing hamlets
because of their close proximity to mangroves (Map 3.22a and b). Avicennia marina, Avicennia officinalis and Aegiceras
corniculatum are the species which villagers tap for firewood. The Forest Department has permitted the collection of dry
twigs and dead wood as firewood from the mangroves after the formation of village-level institutions such as EDC
(Eco-Development Committee formed in Sanctuary areas) and VSS (Vana Samrakshna Samiti formed in non-sanctuary
areas) under the Andhra Pradesh Forestry Project.
64
House Construction
The mangrove wood of a few species such as Excoecaria agallocha, Bruguiera cylindrica, Avicennia marina and A. officinalis
is used for house construction. After the cyclone in 1996, tapping of mangrove wood for house construction has gone
down, because many fishermen families have managed to construct houses in concrete with the help of government and
other aid agencies. The project played a critical role in this development. Community wood lots have also been raised in
villages to meet demand for it.
Figure 24. House constructed using mangrove wood and Palm leaves
65
Fishing
Fishing is allowed in mangroves areas. But during the prawn breeding season, a ban on fishing has been imposed by
the Fisheries Department because of the indiscriminate collection of fish and prawn seeds for aquaculture. (Fishermen
collect prawn, fish and crab along with shells for their livelihood.) All fishing villages depend on mangroves for fishing;
on the other hand, the farming community, particularly from Bhairavalanka and Gogullanka, engages in prawn seed and
crab collection.
Percent
67
Evaporation of
soil water
Stagnation of tidal
water
Development of trough
shaped topography
Subsidence of
sediment
Development of
hyper saline
No Natural regeneration
68
Figure 29. Mangrove wood cleared for house construction and fishing poles
69
70
Figure 33. Digging of canals in the degraded area for tidal flushing
71
Matlapalem
502
Dindu
25
900
Kobbarichettupeta
35
3925
Gadimoga
25
900
Bhairavalanka
75
615
Total
165
6842
72
Figure 35. Erosion along the Corangi RF Extension, Mangroves facing Bay of Bengal
Mangroves
Newly formed Mangroves
Degraded Mangroves
74
Changes between
1986 and 2001
Restoration of
mangroves and
natural regeneration
in the degraded areas
3275 (+)
Natural Regeneration
in the accreted areas
223 (+)
Total increase
3498 (+)
Degradation due to
Aquaculture/ Saltpan
658 (-)
Erosion
806 (-)
Degradation due to
other causes coupe
felling, grazing and felling
1667 (-)
Total loss
3131 (-)
Net Increase
(-) Decrease in area (+) Increase in area
367
Mangroves
Newly formed Mangroves
Degraded Mangroves
77
The sand bed in the middle of the river has shifted southeast and joined the mainland near Gogullanka.
The area under the Rathikaluva RF along the river has eroded to the extent of approximately 500 meters.
The spit formation in the southern part of the Nilarevu river mouth has got extended northward. The river mouth
has also shifted towards northeast from east.
Unlike the sanctuary area, the southern part of the delta has acquired more accretions along its shoreline (northeast
to Masanitippa). The non-reserve forest area south of the Masanitippa RF has eroded; the small mangroves found in
this area have disappeared. The eroded material must have been deposited north of this area near Masanitippa. Accretion
has also been noticed along the coastline southwest of the river mouth near Kothapalem village.
Coastline erosion has reduced both mangrove vegetation and beach sand. At the same time, accretion has led to an
increase in the mangrove area in the Kakinada Bay (Map 3.26).
1 - 8 Reserve Forests
CHAPTER 4
he Krishna mangroves in Andhra Pradesh are located in the coastal plains of Krishna delta. According to the
Forest Department, the total area under mangroves is 5,000 ha. The Krishna mangroves lie between 15
42' N and 15 55' N in latitude and 80 42'- 81 01' E in longitude spread across Krishna and Guntur districts.
The Krishna wildlife sanctuary has been established in a part of the mangrove wetland the total area of this sanctuary
is 19,481 ha (194.81) sq.km.; it includes Sorlagondi Reserve Forest (RF), Nachugunta RF, Yelichetladibba RF, Kottapalem
RF, Molagunta RF, Adavuladivi RF and Lankivanidibba RF. They occupy the islands of the delta and the adjacent
mainlands of both districts. A part of the mangroves is located far from the main mangrove area; its near Machilipatnam
on its eastern side and Nakshatranagar on its western side.
Fishermen in surrounding areas use the mangrove resources for fishing, house construction and firewood and to
obtain fencing material for their houses. A devastating cyclone that hit the Machilipatnam coast during 1977 led to large
areas of the forest getting degraded.
4.1. Geomorphology
Mangrove areas near the river mouth joining the sea are slightly elevated because of sand casting. This inhibits the
entry of tidal water into the area, thereby affecting mangrove growth. This type of area can be seen near Nadimeru
and Gollamattapaya. The area is elevated along the edges of the delta, whereas the middle area is low-lying and swampy.
The delta can be clearly segregated from the mainland through the beach ridge running from east to west, north of
the delta.
Agriculture
Agriculture
Krishna River
Bay of
Bengal
Bay of
Bengal
Mangroves
Bay of
Bengal
Map 4.3. IRS 1D LISS III Remote Sensing Imagery of Krishna delta - 2001
Agriculture
Aquaculkture
Aquaculkture
Krishna River
Bay of
Bengal
Bay of
Bengal
Mangroves
Bay of
Bengal
84
85
The total area of Nachugunta RF is 6,065 ha. of which healthy mangroves take up 2,873 ha. The species diversity
in this RF is greater than in many others. Dense vegetation (Rhizophora apiculata, Avicennia marina and Avicennia officinalis)
is seen along the canals. Prosopis invasion is conspicuous in some places along with mixed vegetation of Excoecaria
agallocha. The mean height of the trees in this area is 4-5 m. Large areas of degraded mangroves occur near Zinkapalem
village with stunted growth of Excoecaria agallocha, Suaeda maritima and Avicennia marina. The Forest Department and
MSSRF have restored these areas. The dominant species are Rhizophora apiculata and Avicennia marina. Species such as
Excoecaria agallocha, Aegiceras corniculatum, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Acanthus ilicifolius have been recorded. The soil is
clayey as one goes landward, and sandy clayey near the shore.
87
The total area of Yelichetladibba RF is 3,714 ha. Dense mangroves occupy 751 ha. of this area. Large areas along
the Nadimeru canal are under intensive aquaculture. The mangrove vegetation is sparse in the land area, but gets thicker
seaward. The degraded areas are found elevated along canals and creeks; tidal water that entered during the spring tide
and during floods stagnated and increased soil salinity, thus leading to degradation of mangroves. Avicennia marina is the
dominant species. Species such as Rhizophora apiculata, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Aegiceras corniculatum have also been
recorded. Acanthus ilicifolius is seen along the creeks. The soil is sandy towards the shore and sandy clay in the land area.
Suaeda maritima and S. nudiflora are noticed in degraded patches and creeks; terrestrial species such as Prosopis, Opuntia and
Asparagus have also been recorded.
88
Kottapalem RF is named after the village Kottapalem situated nearby. The total area of the RF is 1,554 ha, of which
healthy mangroves occupy only 285 ha. Large areas of degraded patches near Vasalsink kalava have been converted
into aquaculture farms.
Thick vegetation of Avicennia marina, Rhizophora apiculata, Rhizophora mucronata and Bruguiera cylindrica, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza,
Xylocarpus granatum is seen along the canals. Suaeda maritima and Salicornia brachiata occur in abandoned aqua farms as well
as in the degraded areas. Species such as Ceriops decandra, Avicennia officinalis, Clerodendrum inerme, Sesuvium portulacastrum
and Salicornia brachiata have been recorded.
89
The total area under Lankivanidibba RF is 5,382 ha. of which 1,974 ha. is covered with thick mangrove vegetation.
Species such as Avicennia marina, A. officinalis, Xylocarpus granatum, Excoecaria agallocha, Ceriops decandra, Rhizophora apiculata
and Bruguiera cylindrica have been recorded. The vegetation is fairly thick. Large degraded areas are found in this RF.
Anthropological pressure is noticed from villages nearby such as Molagunta, Kottapalem, Patur, Nakshatranagar and
Lankivanidibba. The soil in this RF is clayey. Prosopis invasion is high in some areas.
92
Salinity (ppt)
Temperature (c)
98
Salinity and temperature
Salinity and temperature variations were studied during February and May in the creeks of Sorlagondi and
Nakshatranagar (Map 4.9 and 4.10). Salinity variations in the mouth of Sorlagondi in February range from 23 to 32 ppt.
The temperature ranges from 28 to 34C. In May the salinity varies from 27 to 32 ppt and the temperature from 27 to
33C. In Nakshatranagar, the salinity varies from 22 to 32 ppt regardless of the season. The temperature varies from 27
to 32 C in February and 29 to 34 C in May.
99
Prosopis Invasion
Invasion by Prosopis in the mangrove area is prominent and pervasive all along the three main distributaries of
Krishna River as well as in the interior of some of the mangrove forests. Dense Prosopis vegetation is observed along
the Gollamatapaya river up to the river mouths of the Krishna.
100
101
The communities of 28 villages near the mangroves tap the resources (Map 4.11) of Krishna wetlands. The table
below provides details of population, occupation and dependency on mangroves, obtained through the PRA.
Yelichetladibba
Nachugunta
Zinkapalem
Gollamondha
Dheenadayalapuram
Sorlagondi
Nali
Sangameswaram
Pata Upakali
Lankivanidibba
Mollagunta
Tallatippa
Nakshatranagar
Sanjivinagar
Pattur
Mandudupalem
Varmapuram
Zulu
Edurumondi
Kottapalem
Kottur
Dakshinasaradanagar
Uttarasaradanagar
Muktheswarapuram
Kattava
Kallipalaem
Kumaripalem
1154
1500
493
2500
564
2500
1124
1201
700
3000
2500
300
809
550
350
400
630
2000
2000
2500
1400
400
650
370
450
500
520
200
200
75
200
150
400
150
400
400
100
200
40
50
200
25
75
65
80
250
150
100
65
30
65
150
70
40
Total
31065 3930
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Dependency
Houses
Fuel
Fencing
326
300
113
450
143
400
228
300
200
475
400
110
250
150
100
115
145
250
400
450
300
120
130
125
100
160
120
Medium
High
Medium
High
Low
High
Medium
Low
Low
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
High
High
High
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
House
construc- Grazing
tion
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
None
Medium
Low
6360
103
112
116
4.10. Dependency
Grazing
Cattle-grazing in mangrove areas inhibits mangrove growth and the establishment of young seedlings. The cattle
gobble up young leaves of Avicennia marina, and this aborts or limits the growth of mangrove saplings in particular.
According to the local community, cattle graze in the mangrove forest nearby because fodder isnt available (Map 4.18a
and b).
Firewood
Coastal communities depend on mangroves for firewood, because of the proximity of the mangroves and the easy
access to them. Avicennia marina, A. officinalis and Aegiceras corniculatum are the major species used for firewood.
House construction
Mangroves are tapped for house construction. The main species used are Avicennia marina, A. officinalis, Excoecaria
agallocha and Bruguiera cylindrica. Following the 1977 cyclone, the Rashtria Swayam Sevak Sang (RSS), TATA, and Red
Cross Society have constructed pucca houses in a few villages.
117
Fishing
Fishing activities are noticed in all of the mangrove areas. Prawn seeds are collected for supply to aqua farms.
Inevitably, a large number of juvenile fishes and prawns are also collected in the process something that cannot but
affect future fish production. Fishermen collect and market crabs, different varieties of eel fish (known locally as
Guddipamulu, Komiraya pamu, Kulimipamu and Semberipamu) and shellfish.
120
Changes in microtopography due to coupe-felling : Extensive areas of healthy mangrove forest were coupe-felled in the
past. Wherever coupe-felling was done, drastic changes occurred to the micro-topography because of the
evaporation of soil water, the consequent stagnation of tidal water in the coupe-felled area, and the failure of
natural regeneration in mangrove species.
b)
Changes in the biophysical condition due to cyclones: The Krishna mangroves experienced two severe cyclonic storms
during 1977 and 1990. Though the magnitude of the destruction could not be assessed, the storms caused
extensive damage to mangroves through sand casting, making these areas unsuitable for mangrove vegetation.
121
c)
Progradation of shoreline: Progradation (flat areas gradually tapering into the sea) of the Krishna coast shoreline has
been rapid. Coupled with low tidal amplitude, this phenomenon hampers tidal flushing of the wetland in the
upper portion of the mangroves. Result: mangrove wetlands in these areas have gradually got converted into
terrestrial areas, no more suitable for mangrove plantation.
d)
As explained earlier, the local community living in coastal areas particularly fishers, use the mangroves for firewood,
fencing materials fodder, house construction and grazing.
e)
Conversion of mangrove wetlands into prawn farms: Prawn farms are coming up on a large scale in the Krishna mangrove
region. As mentioned earlier, even some part of the Reserve Forests has been converted into aquaculture farms.
f)
Reduction in fresh water flow: The quantity of fresh water reaching the Krishna mangroves has got progressively
reduced because of the diversion of fresh water in the upstream area. This also affects both the growth and the
quality of mangrove wetlands.
122
123
Table 10 Details of restoration and Mangrove Management Units - Krishna
Demonstration village
236
2000
Dheenadayalapuram
Nali
Zinkapalem
114
600
Total
355
2600
125
Figure 59. Large patch of degraded area - a common feature in Krishna wetland
127
CHAPTER 5
Long-term Management
he species diversity and population density of each species relate directly to the spatial and temporal discharge
of river water flow. It has been determined that the past management practice of clear felling by coupe contractors
(without realizing that mangroves are not coppicing by nature) has led to blank formations and inhibited natural
regeneration.
The dams constructed across the Godavari river at Dowleswaram and Alamatti Dam in Karnataka; as well as the
Prakasham barrage at Vijayawada in Andhra Pradesh across the Krishna to increase cultivable areas have reduced river
water flow and consequently the nutrients that mangroves require. The natural regeneration of mangrove species and
the establishment of saplings have been inhibited. This has in fact led to the gradual disappearance of some mangrove
species. The loss of Sonneratia apetela from the mangroves of Pichavaram is an example. It happened because of the
reduced flow of river water from 1950 till date.
Chronological data on salinity and tidal amplitude show that past mangrove species need to be restored and reestablished through afforestation as a means of long-term management. The river mouths must be periodically cleared
and sand bars removed to ensure free flow of river water into the sea. This can improve nutrient supply not only to the
mangroves but also to the juveniles of fish that breed in the open sea and take shelter in the mangroves. Periodical
monitoring of sandbar formation in the river mouth, coupled with monitoring of rainfall and water discharge from
Dowleswaram and other barrages, could be very effective. These measures must be implemented with rigour. Dredging
of the river mouth can be organized in co-operation with port authorities and local fishermen, as both will benefit from
the resulting economic and ecological improvements.
Another important cause of degradation is the felling of mangroves by the poor to meet genuine basic needs.
A mangrove protection policy should offer these people viable alternatives to mangroves for firewood, fencing, fodder
and house construction. A sustainable method of mangrove harvesting should also be evolved. . Participatory patrolling
by members of EDC/ VSS and the staff of the Forest Department, and strict and systematic vigilance, are essential for
better mangrove management.
132
133
134
Figure 67. Training for alternative income through coir rope making
135
Figure 68. Alternatives for fencing - Jatropha being used as line fencing
136
REFERENCES
1.
ADB/NACA. 1998. Aquaculture sustainability and the environment, Report on a Regional Study and Workshop on
Aquaculture Sustainability and the Environment, Bangkok, Thailand, Asian Development Bank and Network of
Aquaculture Centres in Asia and the Pacific.
2.
Andhra Pradesh Remote Sensing Application Centre (APRSAC). 1999. Environmental management and monitoring of shrimp culture project, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - land use/land cover, Hyderabad, India.
3.
Forest Survey of India. 1999. Status of Forest Report, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of
India, New Delhi.
4.
Blasco, F. and Aizpura, M. 2002. Mangroves along the coastal stratch of the Bay of Bengal: Present status,
Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 9 20.
5.
Blasco F., Kerrest, R. and Marius, C. 1985. Considerations on some ecological factors influencing the biology
of Indian mangroves. In Bhosale. L. J. (ed.), The Mangroves, Shivaji University, Kolhapur. 135 146.
6.
Caratini, C. F., Blasco, F. and Thanikoimoni, G. 1973. Relations between the pollen spectra and the vegetation of a south Indian mangrove, Pollen et spores, 15: 281 292.
7.
Mishra, H. C. 1999. The dynamics of Hope Island A study using IRS 1B & 1C satellite data, GIS India, 8:
17 18.
8.
Mittal, R. 1993. Management plan for Coringa Wildlife Sanctuary, Forest Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Hyderabad.
9.
Rangarao, V., Reddy, B. S. R., Raman, A. V. and Ramana Murthy, M. V. 2003. Oceanographic features of
the Bay Mangrove water ways of Coringa, East coast of India, Proceedings of AP Akademy Sci., 135-142.
10.
Reddy, B.S.R. and Prasad, K.V.S.R.1982. The sand spit near Kakinada Further studies, Indian J Ear Sci., 9:
167 173.
11.
Robertson, A.I. and Alongi, D.M. 1992. Tropical mangrove ecosystems: Coastal and Estuarine studies,
American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 329.
12.
Selvam, V. 2003. Environmental classification of Mangrove wetlands of Inida, Current science, 84 (6): 757 765.
13.
14.
15.
Sidhu.S.S. 1963. Studies on the mangroves of India: East Godavari Region, Indian Forester, 89: 337-351.
16.
Uma Maheswara Rao, M. and Narasimha Rao, G.M. 1988. Mangrove populations of the Godavari delta
complex. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 17:326-329.
17.
http://wrmin.nic.in/riverbasin