LSC Volume 33, Number 3, December 2010
LSC Volume 33, Number 3, December 2010
LSC Volume 33, Number 3, December 2010
Managing Editor
: 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Senior Editors
: 1.
2.
3.
4.
Editors
Secretariat
: 1. Ngadimun
2. Rasikin
Publisher
: LEMIGAS Research and Development Centre for Oil and Gas Technology
Afilliation Division
Printed by
: Grafika LEMIGAS
Address
LEMIGAS Research and Development Division for Afilliation, Jl. Ciledug Raya, Kav. 109, Cipulir, Kebayoran
Lama, P.O. Box 1089/JKT, Jakarta Selatan 12230 INDONESIA, STT: No. 348/SK/DITJEN PPG/STT/1987/
May 12, 1977, Phone: 7228614, 7394422 - Ext. 1222, 1223, Fax : 62 - 21 - 7228614 and 7246150, e-mail:
[email protected]
Lemigas Scientific Contributions has been published since 1977, 3 times a year. The editor receives scientific
articles about research results, related to the oil and gas research.
Lemigas Scientific Contributions is published by LEMIGAS Research and Development Centre for Oil and
Gas Technology. Chief Editor : Dra. Yanni Kussuryani, M.Si. Managing Editor: Agus Salim, S.H., M.H.
Page
ii
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
iii
155 - 164
165 - 179
180 - 187
188 - 197
198 - 203
204 - 211
212 - 219
The descriptions given are free terms. This abstract sheet may be reproduced without permission or charge
Ego Syahrial (Technological Assessor at LEMIGAS
R & D Centre for Oil and Gas Technology)
APPLICATION OF NEW COMPOSITIONAL
SIMULATION APPROACH TO MODEL GRAVITY SEGREGATION IN VOLATILE OIL RESERVOIRS
LSC, December 2010, Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 155 - 164
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we investigate the recovery performance of gas injection from volatile oil reservoirs.
Cross-sectional reservoir studies for investigating
the gravity segregation during depletion and gas
cycling in volatile oil reservoirs is discussed. Furthermore the effects of vertical permeability on
gravity segregation in a homogeneous and horizontal reservoirs are investigated.
A new efficient compositional simulation approach
was used in this study to investigate the influence
of gravity segregation and their magnitude in the
case of lean gas injection into a volatile oil reservoir. The new compositional simulation approach
was validated through analytical and numerical
methods, and it is unconditionally stable and as
stable as fully compositional model.
The results show that an increase in vertical to horizontal permeability ratios results in an increase in
the effect of gravity segregation and yield early
gas breakthrough. On the other hand, the smaller
the permeability ratios (vertical to horizontal), better
are the recoveries due to resulting even layer
sweeps. Gravity forces have a considerable effect
on volatile oil recovery via gas injection and the
need for determining not only the fluid characteristics but also the reservoir heterogeneities was significant.
(Author)
Key words: compositional, equation of state, gravity segregation, volatile
iv
vi
EGO SYAHRIAL
ABSTRACTS
In this paper, we investigate the recovery performance of gas injection from volatile oil
reservoirs. Cross-sectional reservoir studies for investigating the gravity segregation during depletion and gas cycling in volatile oil reservoirs is discussed. Furthermore the effects
of vertical permeability on gravity segregation in a homogeneous and horizontal reservoirs are investigated.
A new efficient compositional simulation approach was used in this study to investigate
the influence of gravity segregation and their magnitude in the case of lean gas injection
into a volatile oil reservoir. The new compositional simulation approach was validated
through analytical and numerical methods, and it is unconditionally stable and as stable
as fully compositional model.
The results show that an increase in vertical to horizontal permeability ratios results in
an increase in the effect of gravity segregation and yield early gas breakthrough. On the
other hand, the smaller the permeability ratios (vertical to horizontal), better are the recoveries due to resulting even layer sweeps. Gravity forces have a considerable effect on
volatile oil recovery via gas injection and the need for determining not only the fluid
characteristics but also the reservoir heterogeneities was significant.
Key words: compositional, equation of state, gravity segregation, volatile
I. INTRODUCTION
A volatile oil is defined as a high shrinkage crude
oil near its critical point (Moses, 1986). In a phase
diagram, it is recognised as a type between a blackoil and a gas-condensate fluid. With deeper drilling,
more reservoirs containing volatile crude oil and gas
condensates have been found and the need for accurate and economic methods for studying the performance of such reservoirs has become important. In
the early 1950s several material balance methods
were used for reservoir performance predictions (e.g.,
Cook et al., 1951; Jacoby & Berry, 1957;
Reudelhuber & Hinds, 1957). Cook et al. (1951) presented a method of estimating future reservoir performance and oil recovery of highly volatile type oil
reservoirs. Later, Woods (1955) applied Cook et al.
155
EGO SYAHRIAL
Vr
w Sw n 1 w Sw n ,
t
(1)
- Oil equation:
To o o qo
Vr
o So n 1 o So n ,
t
(2)
EGO SYAHRIAL
- Gas equation:
Tg g g qg
- Water Equation:
Vr
g Sg
t
n 1
g Sg
, (3)
n
k A k
Tl rl l , l o, g , w
x l
WS i 1, j ,k S wi1, j ,k WS i , j ,k S wi , j ,k
The same expression exists for y- and zdirection. In this formulation, all transmissibility
term are treated implicitly. To obtain the hydrocarbon equation, both sides of oil and gas equations (Eqs. (2) and (3)) are multiplied by n1
g
- Hydrocarbon equation:
T
n 1
o
n 1
o
T
n 1
o
n 1
g
n 1
g
n 1
g
oqo g qg
Vr
o gSh n1 gn1oSo n on1g Sg n
t
n 1
o
- Hydrocarbon Equation:
H Pi , j ,k 1 Poi , j ,k 1 H Pi , j 1,k Poi , j 1,k H Pi1, j ,k Poi 1, j ,k
H Pi , j ,k Poi , j ,k
(7)
H S i 1, j ,k S wi 1, j ,k H S i , j ,k S wi , j ,k H S i 1, j ,k S wi1, j ,k
H S i , j 1,k S wi , j 1,k H S i , j ,k 1 S wi , j ,k 1 Crh
and n1
respectively, and combined, hence:
o
n 1
g
(6)
WS i 1, j ,k S wi 1, j ,k
(8)
where,
S h n1 S o n1 S g n1
- Water equation:
(4)
Vr
wSw n 1 wSw n
t
(5)
Compositions are computed explicitly by a method developed by Tsutsumi and Dixon (1972). The overall compositions of the components can be expressed as:
n1
m
Vr n
n1 n1 n1 n1 n1 n1
n
n
xm To o ym Tg g xmo qo ym g qg t z o So g Sg
V
n
n
Ton1no1 Tgn1ng1 o qo g qg r o So g S g
t
(9)
Oil and gas saturations are calculated as the final result of a
series of computations form:
Vr
n
n
n 1
n 1
To o o qo t o S o
S on 1
Vr
o n1
t
n 1
g
Vr
n
n
n 1
n 1
Tg g g q g t g S g
Vr
g n1
(10)
(11)
D. Validation Procedures
The equations presented in the previous section were
coded into a computer program that provides a field-scale
157
EGO SYAHRIAL
injection into volatile oil reservoirs. The recovery efficiencies of immiscible and miscible gas displacement due to gravity segregation are affected by:
1. Increased permeability (either horizontal or vertical).
2. Increased density difference.
3. Increased mobility ratio.
4. Decreasing production rates.
A compositional simulation approach is fully implemented to investigate the influence of gravity segregation and their magnitude in the case of lean gas
injection into a volatile oil reservoir. Well production
performance, gas saturation distribution and the composition of the production stream will be monitored in
view of gravity segregation in order to explore the
ways of maximising recovery. By knowing the factors and the magnitude of the influence of gravity
segregation, design considerations of the injection fluid
into reservoir fluid can be properly evaluated.
Table 1
Data used for cross-sectional studies
Property
Field Units
SI Units
Grid System
40x1x20
40x1x20
Reservoir Length, L
3000 ft
914.40 m
Reservoir Width, w
50 ft
15.24 m
100 ft
Area of Cross-Section, A
Dip Angle,
Horizontal Permeability, k h
5000 ft
0
30.48 m
2
464.52 m
0
-13
200 mD
Porosity,
Connate Water Saturation, S wc
15%
1.97x10 m
15%
20%
20%
30%
30%
5%
5%
80%
80%
0%
0%
A. Cross-Sectional Studies
20%
20%
2800.0 psia
19.31 Mpa
Datum
Reservoir Temperature, T r
8500 ft
2591 m
234F
112.2C
158
40
40
4x10 psi
Water Compressibility, c w
3x10 psi
-6
-1
5.80x10 kPa
-7
-1
-6
-1
4.35x10 kPa
-7
-1
EGO SYAHRIAL
Table 2
Fluid compositions and properties at reservoir conditions
Component
Mole Frac.
T c (F)
p c (psia)
Zc
MW
P ch
CO 2
0.0103
88.79
1071.33
0.2741
44.01
0.225
78.0
N2
0.0055
-232.51
492.31
0.2912
28.01
0.040
41.0
C1
0.3647
-116.59
667.78
0.2847
16.04
0.013
77.0
C2
0.0933
90.10
708.34
0.2846
30.07
0.099
108.0
C3
0.0885
205.97
618.70
0.2775
44.10
0.152
150.3
C4
0.0600
295.43
543.45
0.2772
58.12
0.196
187.2
C5
0.0378
378.95
487.17
0.2688
72.15
0.241
228.9
C6
0.0356
461.93
484.38
0.2754
84.00
0.250
271.0
0.3043
836.63
266.33
0.2398
200.00
0.648
520.0
C7
B . Gravity Segregation in
Homogeneous and
Horizontal Reservoirs
Table 3
Compositions of the lean injection gas
Lean Gas
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C 7+
0.85
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.08
Figure 1
Water-oil relative permeability curves
EGO SYAHRIAL
that miscibility occurred during the injection. To compare the relative performance of gas cycling with different values of vertical to horizontal permeability ratio, natural depletion is also
conducted in this study.
C. Effect of Vertical
Permeability on Gravity
Segregation
In this section the effect of vertical permeability on gravity segregation in homogeneous and horizontal
reservoirs is investigated. Three different ratios of vertical to horizontal
permeability kv/kh: 1.0, 0.1 and 0.01
respectively are used in the modelling
procedure. Also, the depletion processes is modelled with a ratio of vertical to horizontal permeability of 0.1.
Figures 3 through 5 show the
methane saturation distribution for
each case studied after 18.8% HCPV
(300 days) of lean gas injection. It is
clear from these Figures that an increase in vertical to horizontal permeability ratios results in an increase in
the effect of gravity segregation and
yield early gas breakthrough. Table 4
shows the relative breakthrough times
(defined as approximately 2% Methane increase in the producing stream)
and the corresponding C7+ (a component that characterises the liquid) recoveries. It is also clear from this Table
that smaller the permeability ratios
(vertical to horizontal) better are the
recoveries due to resulting even layer
sweeps.
Table 5 shows the comparison of
C7+ recoveries and gas-oil ratios after
600 days (37% HCPV) of gas injection. Figures 6 & 7 show the temporal
variations of C7+ production rate and
gas-oil ratio respectively for the same
period. The C7+ recovery for kv/kh:
0.01 is about 1.6 times that can be obtained from kv/kh: 1.0. The gas-oil ra160
Figure 2
Gas-oil relative permeability curves
Figure 3
Gas saturation in a horizontal reservoir, kv/kh = 1.0
Figure 4
Gas saturation in a horizontal reservoir, kv/kh = 0.01
EGO SYAHRIAL
Table 4
C7+ recovery at breakthrough
Table 5
C7+ recovery and GOR after 600 days
1.00
130
0.31
1.00
C7+
Re cove ry
(fra c.)
0.16
0.10
250
0.32
0.10
0.18
5.40
0.01
340
0.33
0.01
0.25
4.43
k v /k h
Breakthrough C 7 + Recovery
Time (Days)
(frac.)
k v /k h
GOR
MSCF/STB)
5.50
Figure 5
Gas saturation in a horizontal reservoir, kv/kh= 0.01
Figure 6
Temporal variation of C7+ in a horizontal reservoir
161
EGO SYAHRIAL
Figure 7
Gas-Oil ratio versus time in a horizontal reservoir
Figure 8
Total mole fraction of methane after 300 days
Figure 9
Total mole fraction of methane after 1000 Days
162
EGO SYAHRIAL
3.
4.
5.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
1. The model formulation developed has an implicit
transmissibility term, an implicit for oil-phase pressure and water saturation and explicit equation
for the overall composition of each hydrocarbon
component that satisfies thermodynamic equilibrium. It is unconditionally stable like the Fully
Implicit approach and can be as cheap as IMPES.
2. The new model requires less number of equations to be solved per time step than the fully implicit method and only needs one to two iterations
per time step, this formulation is as cheap as
IMPES and is as accurate as fully implicit methods.
3. An increase in vertical to horizontal permeability
ratios results in an increase in the effect of gravity segregation and yield early gas breakthrough.
The smaller the permeability ratios (vertical to
horizontal), better are the recoveries due to resulting even layer sweeps.
4. Gravity forces have a considerable effect on volatile oil recovery via gas injection and the need for
determining not only the fluid characteristics but
also the reservoir heterogeneities was significant.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
REFERENCES
1. Buckley, S.E. and Leverett, M.C.: Mechanism
of Fluid Displacement in Sands, Trans., AIME
146, (1942) 107-116.
2. Coats, K.H. and Smart, G.T.: Application Of A
Regression Based EOS PVT Programe To Laboratory Data, paper SPE 11197, Proc. 57th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of
13.
EGO SYAHRIAL
14. Tsutsumi, G. and Dixon, T.N.: Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flow With Interphase Mass
Transfer In Petroleum Reservoirs, paper SPE,
Proc. SPE-AIME 47th Annual Fall Meeting, San
Antonio (Oct. 8-11, 1972).
164
15. Woods, R.W.: Case History of Reservoir Performance of a Highly Volatile Type Oil Reservoir, Trans., AIME (1955) 204, 156-59.
BAMBANG WIDARSONO
ABSTRACT
Wettability is a reservoir rock property that is not easy to measure and quantify but has
a crucial effect on other rock properties such as relative permeability, capillary pressure,
and electrical properties. Problem that may occur with regard to this matter is that those
properties are often measured on already cleansed core samples as part of the standard
procedure. Having undergone the normally utilized heated cleansing process alteration in
the rocks original wettability was often reported. Under such condition, unrepresentative
wettability certainly leads to unrepresentative measured data with all of consequences.
This article presents a study that uses 363 sandstone samples retrieved from 28 oil and gas
fields in Indonesia. The study consists of two stages of analysis. First analysis is performed
on data obtained from three wettability tests results while the second one is made with using
water-oil relative permeability data, that is usually measured on cleansed core samples.
Original wettability data shows that the sandstones varry in wettability from water-wet to
oil-wet (48.2% and 30.2% of total samples, respectively). Comparison between data of the
two analyses shows that original wettability tends to degrade in strength after cleaning
down to neutral wettability, among which neutral wettability appears to be the largest in
number (49.1% of total sample). Results also show that weak wettability tends to endure
more than stronger ones. The overall results have demonstrated the need for caution in
core handling and for measures that can minimize the risk.
Key words: wettability, sandstones, alteration, core cleansing, wettability degradation,
misleading petrophysical data, cautious core handling
I. INTRODUCTION
One of the most important properties of reservoir rocks is wettability. Wettability is basically an
inclination of reservoir rocks to be wetted by certain
fluids, either oil or water, due to which other rock
physical properties such as capillary pressure and
relative permeability are influenced. Reservoir rocks
that tend to be water-wet respond differently to oil
flow compared to what is shown by oil-wet ones,
which in turn controls capillary pressure and relative
permeability behavior hence governing hydrocarbon
displacement and ultimate hydrocarbon recovery.
In oil saturated water-wet rocks the oil rests on
thin film of water spread over the rocks interior sur-
165
displacement is followed by water forced displacement to yield total produced oil volume of Vod (includes Voi). Mathematically, the two indexes are expressed as:
IO
VWi
VWd
(3)
Voi
V od
(4)
and
IW
Table 2
Value ranges established for wettability classification used in the study
168
BAMBANG WIDARSONO
Table 4
Result example of wettability test using Amott technique.
The generally preferential water-wet rocks are from BK 232 well, Central Sumatra Basin
Wettability Index
Sample
number
Permeability
Porosity
(mD)
(%)
W-wet
O-wet
23
25.4
0.4167
0.0000
0.4167
preferential water-wet
10
3251
32.5
0.4355
0.1719
0.2636
preferential water-wet
13
772
31.4
0.3352
0.0789
0.2563
preferential water-wet
19
22
22.6
0.4800
0.0000
0.4800
preferential water-wet
20
25.5
0.4857
0.4113
0.0744
neutral
Interpretation
171
BAMBANG WIDARSONO
Table 5
Result example of wettability test using USBM technique.
The generally oil-wet rocks are from T 105 well, Barito Basin
Interpretation
(%)
A1
I log
A2
147
24.7
-0.336
oil wet
265B
47
21.8
0.106
217
29
23.6
-0.346
oil wet
216
34
24.6
-0.392
oil wet
119B
844
28.1
-0.199
105
62
27.5
-0.140
Permeability
Porosity
(mD)
276
Sample No.
Figure 5
Three pairs of relative permeability curves (solid and dashed ones for Kro and Krw,
respectively) taken from; a) PP-CC5 well (N Sumatera Basin),
b) KW P6 well (NE Java Basin), and FW-2 well (NW Java Basin). In accordance with the
criteria established in this study, the three exemplary data sets tend to exhibit wettability
tendencies of oil-wet, neutral, and strong water-wet, respectively.
172
Figure 7
Wettability composition of samples that originally
belonged to strong water-wet class. Although most samples
still retain water-wetness inclination some have lost their
preference to water-wetness
Figure 8
Wettability composition of samples that originally belonged
to water-wet class. Most samples vave become neutral
but oddly enough some of them switch side into oil-wet group
Figure 9
Wettability composition of samples that originally belonged to
preferentially water-wet class. Some samples retain their original
wettability but most samples have become neutral. Small portion
of samples also become preferentially oil-wet
Figure 10
Wettability composition of samples that originally belonged
to oil-wet class. None of the samples retain their original
wettability and most samples have degraded into softer wettability,
and some even become inclined into the water-wet group
175
Figure 11
Wettability composition of samples that originally belonged
to preferentially oil-wet class. Similar to the case of preferentially
water-wet class, many of the samples retain their original
wettability and most became neutral.
Some few samples have gone to oil-wet tendency, however
Figure 12
Wettability composition of samples that originally belonged
to neutral class. Majority of samples remain neutral,
and if samples of the two preferential wetness classes are included
on the ground of classification uncertainty this portion
is even higher to reach 88.4% of total samples
REFERENCES
1. Amott, E. (1959). Observation relating to the
wettability of porous rock. Trans. AIME, Vol.
216, pp. 156 162.
2. Amyx, J.W., Bass JR, D.M & Whiting, R.L.
(1960). Petroleum reservoir engineering: Physical properties. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New
York, p. 610.
3. Anderson, W.G. (1986a). Wettability literature
survey Part 2: Wettability measurement. Soc.
Petrol. Eng. JPT vol. 38, pp. 1246 1262.
4. Anderson, W.G. (1986b). Wettability literature
survey Part 5: The effects of wettability on
relative permeability. Soc. Petrol. Eng. JPT vol.
38, pp. 1453 1468.
5. API (1960). Recommended practice for core
analysis procedure API RP 40. The American Petroleum Institute, August.
6. Archer, J.S. and Wall, C.G. (1986). Petroleum
engineering: Principles and practice. Graham &
Trotman Ltd, Sterling House, 66 Wilton Road,
London SW1V 1DE, UK, p.362.
178
Influence on Electrical Characteristics: Old Issue, Ever Present Problem). (in Bahasa Indonesia). Lembaran Publikasi LEMIGAS, Vol. 42, No.
1, April, pp: 20 - 28.
179
SUGIHARDJO, ET AL.
ABSTRACT
Low sweep efficiency is the common problem in displacement process due to heterogeneity, high permeability streaks, fractures, and thief zones existing in the formation. Similarly, the success or failure of EOR implementations are always affected by those problems
which causes displacing fluids fingering and early breakthrough. Factors of this type,
unless properly identified and understood before the start of EOR process, will likely cause
a project failure.
Core flooding as the model of small scale of fluids movements in reservoir undergoes
similar circumstances. Approximately one foot long of four 3.5 inches stacked native and
synthetic cores are normally used in core flooding experiment. Tracer test was performed
to characterize the core in addition of CT scan analysis. On this experiment, lithium solution was selected as tracer solution to be then injected into core at constant rate, 4 ft/day.
Afterwards, the effluents were collected by Gilson sample collector in each tube for further
determinination its concentration using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS).
Response curves of lithium tracer were able to determine core heterogeneities and this
should be done to avoid misleading interpretation of core flooding results. Besides, lithium
concentration reported in some extent and subsequently analyzed by employing method of
temporal moments. This method provides numerical calculation to estimate effective core
pore volume (PV) and fluid saturation. Weighing method was also used to compare the PV
with aforementioned method and the results were comparable.
Key Words: Tracer, heterogeinity, fluid saturation, and core flooding
I. INTRODUCTION
EOR is the only technology which is capable for
producing the remaining of oil in the reservoirs after
primary and secondary recovery processes. Success
of secondary and tertiary oil recovery projects targeting the remaining oil in mature or partially depleted
reservoirs strongly depends on adequate description
of reservoir heterogeneity. Processes that are wellunderstood in a laboratory environment and those also
should be properly designed for the reservoir scale.
A number of procedures exist that can be used before implementation of an EOR process in attempt to
describe the reservoir geology. One of these procedures is tracer test.
180
Tracer technology plays an important role in improving the reservoir characterization before the application of EOR methods by providing qualitative
information on reservoir compartmentalization, preferential flow paths to improve understanding of fluid
movement in the reservoir, stratification, and heterogeneities distribution. Basically, tracer is chemicals
that can be added to fluids in small concentrations
and used to follows their movement without affecting their physical properties. It also can be used as
an effective tool to detect and estimate of remaining
oil saturation using two different types of tracers. The
two tracer types are differentiated into the conservative (ideal) tracer and the partitioning tracer. The
SUGIHARDJO, ET AL.
Figure 1
Top Synthetic and Bottom Wrapped
Stacked Native Cores
Figure 2
CT Scan on Stacked Core Plugs
181
SUGIHARDJO, ET AL.
Figure 3
Coreflood Equipment Applied for Tracer Test
182
SUGIHARDJO, ET AL.
Core length
Core diameter
Pore volume
27.18 cm
3.8 cm
115.23 cc (?)
Porosity
30.08 %
Flow rate
0.3 cc/min
Velocity
Temperature
Mobile phase
Volume of tracer injected
4 ft/day
o
85 C
Synthetic brine
24.36 cc
Figure 4
Tracer Response Curve
183
SUGIHARDJO, ET AL.
Figure 5
Li Extrapolated Curve
C Cb e
t t b
a
........................................
(1)4
SUGIHARDJO, ET AL.
t*
tb
b atb
e (1 at b )
a2
tb
................... (2)4
b atb
Cdt
e
0
a
tCdt
Vp
m
qinj t * ................ (3)4
M inj
Figure 6
Pore Volume Estimation Curve
Figure 4 shows the tracer response and indicated that the core
is homogeneous curving with the
single peak and having almost similar front tail and end tail formation.
But Figure 7 is heterogeneous
core reflected from two peaks
which formed in tracer response
curve. These peaks mean the core
was stratified into different flow
paths.
Another case depicted in Figure 8 shows scattered and varying
noise in response curve that may
indicate the leakage occurred during the flooding due to imperfect
core set up particularly in core
holder sleeve.
B. Saturation Determination
Tracer test can be used in validating fluid content during coreflood
Figure 7
Heterogeneity Core Response Curve
185
SUGIHARDJO, ET AL.
Table 2
Saturation Determination
CoreSample
Synthetic
Native
Soi%PV
Swc%PV
ROSWF%
PV
RFEOR%
ROS
60.95
61.54
39.05
38.46
26.24
27.59
80.65
95.76
Figure 8
Leakage on Core Holder Set up Response Curve
VI. CONCLUSIONS
1. Effective pore volume estimates
from temporal moments and
weighing method are 118.14 cc
and 115.23 cc, respectively.
2. Tracer test provides helpful tools
to improve core characterization
by providing qualitative information on preferential flow, stratification, core connectivity, heterogeneities distribution and apparatus set up.
3. Method of First Temporal Moment Analysis is simpler and
faster to interpret tracer response curve.
186
Figure 9
Tracer Response Curves at Each Step of Flood
SUGIHARDJO, ET AL.
4. Tracer test possible to be used as initial assessment to core before proceeding core flooding.
Hence, it will save times and cost in experimental.
4. Shook, G. M., J. Hope Forsmann, Tracer Interpretation Using Temporal Moments on a Spreadsheet Idaho National Laboratory documents,(2005)
VII. NOMENCLATURE
5. Asakawa, K., A generalized analysis of partitioning interwell tracer test, dissertation, university of texas, (2005).
C
q
M
ROS
RF
=
=
=
=
=
REFERENCES
1. Tang, J.S.,Extended brigham model for remaining oil saturation measurement by partitioning
tracer test, SPE 84874.
2. Sinha, R., K. Asakawa K, G.A. Pope, and K.
Sepehnoori,Simulation of natural and partitioning interwell tracer test to calculate saturation and
swept volume in oil reservoirs, SPE 89458.
3. Illiasov, P.A., A.D. Gupta, and D.W. Vasco,
Field-Scale Characterization of Permeability and
Saturation Distribution Using Partitioning Tracer
Tests: The Ranger Field, Texas, SPE 71320.
187
EGO SYAHRIAL
ABSTRACTS
In this paper, we investigate gravity segregation in stratified and dipping reservoir of
volatile oil under gas injection. A new efficient compositional simulation approach was
used in this study to investigate the influence of gravity segregation and their magnitude in
the case of gas injection into a volatile oil reservoir. The results show that in stratified and
dipping reservoirs where the permeability decreases with depth, smaller the vertical to
horizontal permeability ratio, lesser is the effect of gravity segregation, better is the sweep
efficiency and hence better is the recovery. In the case of increasing permeability with
depth in stratified dipping reservoirs, an up-dip gas injection into a volatile oil reservoir
was found to be a favourable condition in term of recovery. Gravity forces have a considerable effect on volatile oil recovery via gas injection and the need for determining not
only the fluid characteristics but also the reservoir heterogeneities was significant.
Key words: compositional, equation of state, gravity segregation, volatile
I. INTRODUCTION
The volumetric sweepout during miscible and
immiscible displacement is always less than 100%
because of (Syahrial, 1997):
- permeability stratification,
- viscous fingering,
- gravity segregation,
- incomplete areal sweepout.
In the case of miscible displacement, the hydrocarbon solvents are typically both less viscous and
less dense than reservoir oils. In horizontal reservoirs,
gravity segregation due to density difference between
injected fluid and the in situ fluid decreases vertical
sweepout resulting in early breakthrough. On the other
hand, the presence of gravity segregation in the dipping reservoir can improve sweepout and displacement efficiency. This can be attained by injecting the
solvent up-dip and producing the reservoir at a rate
low enough for gravity to keep the less dense solvent segregated from oil. In this way it is also possible to suppress fingers of solvent as they try to form.
188
EGO SYAHRIAL
volatile oil reservoir. A stratified and dipping reservoir with constant and with spatially variable fluid
compositions was chosen in this study. The composition of the production stream will be monitored in view
of gravity segregation to explore the ways of maximizing recovery. By knowing the factors and the
magnitude of the influence of gravity segregation,
design considerations of the injection fluid into reservoir fluid can be properly accounted for.
II. COMPOSITIONAL SIMULATION FOR
VOLATILE OIL
Reservoir processes that require compositional
modeling can be divided into two major types. The
first type is depletion and/or cycling of volatile oil and
gas condensate reservoirs. The second type is miscible flooding with first contact and multiple-contactmiscibility generated in situ. The development of compositional simulators can be classified into three categories. The first category concerns with the new
formulations and efficient solution schemes for the
mass conservation equations. In this category the
formulations are divided into two basic schemes,
namely IMPES and fully implicit schemes. The primary difference between these two schemes is in
the treatment of the flow coefficient. The second
category concerns with the efficiency of the phase
equilibrium calculation schemes. In this category, the
formulation is differenced whether or not they use
the Equations of State for phase equilibrium and property calculations. The last category concerns the representations of physical phenomena, such as the effect of interfacial tension to the shape of relative permeability curves.
Several formulations which became the bases for
the current state-of-the-art compositional simulation
procedures have been proposed. These include two
fully implicit formulations (Coats, 1980; Chien et al.,
1985), a sequential semi-implicit formulation (Watts,
1983), an adaptive implicit scheme (Collins et al.,
1992), three IMPES formulations (Kazemi et al.,
1978; Nghiem et al., 1981; Acs et al., 1985) and two
formulations which solve for pressure and composition simultaneously, but use explicit flow coefficients
(Fussell & Fussell, 1979; Young & Stephenson, 1983).
Also, the other recent formulations that are essentially similar to these formulations have been commented on (e.g., Guehria et al., 1990; Guehria et al.,
1991; Quandalle & Savary, 1989; Branco &
Vr
w Sw n 1 w Sw n ,
t
(1)
Oil equation:
To o o qo
(2)
(3)
Vr
o So n 1 o So n ,
t
Gas equation:
Tg g g q g
Vr
g Sg
t
n 1
g Sg
EGO SYAHRIAL
= porosity,
= molar density,
S = phase saturation,
x i = mole fraction of component i in the liquid
phase,
y i = mole fraction of component i in the vapour
phase,
z i = total mole fraction of component i,
K i = equilibrium ration of component i,
qi = injection or production rate of component i.
The above equations are highly non-linear and
analytical solutions are not possible. Consequently,
numerical methods are required. To implement numerical techniques, however, the flow equations must
be linearised and discretized by applying a finite difference scheme using backward difference in time
and central difference in space (Peaceman, 1967).
The results of discretisation leads to the system of
equations in matrix form. This particular matrix form
can be solved in each Newtonian iteration by either
direct, or iterative methods in order to obtain the required changes in pressure and saturation.
The new formulation has an implicit equation for
the oil-phase pressure and water saturation, an explicit equation for the hydrocarbon saturation, and
explicit equation for the overall composition of each
hydrocarbon component that satisfies thermodynamic
equilibrium. The formulation uses an Equation of State
for phase equilibrium and property calculations. Interfacial tension effects are included in the formulation to characterise the thermodynamically dynamic
nature of the relative permeability. A two-dimensional
relative permeability algorithm is included which
handles lumped hydrocarbon phase as well as individual phase flows.
For each grid block two equations are required,
namely total hydrocarbon and water-phase flow equations. The new compositional simulation approach is
validated through analytical and other numerical methods. It was demonstrated in the previous publications
that the results are compared favourably with analytical techniques and published numerical results
(Syahrial & Daltaban, 1998; Syahrial & Daltaban,
1998; Syahrial 2010). They also confirm that the proposed codified formulation is unconditionally stable
and it is as stable as fully compositional model yet the
computational cost reduction was substantial.
190
Layer
Permeability (mD)
Porosity (frac.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
150
100
80
70
60
50
40
30
25
20
15
10
0.178
0.176
0.173
0.172
0.168
0.166
0.162
0.157
0.155
0.150
0.147
0.145
0.142
0.137
0.135
0.132
0.127
0.125
0.122
0.116
EGO SYAHRIAL
Figure 1
Water-oil Relative Permeability Curves
Table 2
Data Used for Cross-Sectional Studies
Property
Field Units
SI Units
Grid System
40x1x20
40x1x20
Reservoir Length, L
3000 ft
914.40 m
Reservoir Width, w
50 ft
15.24 m
100 ft
Area of Cross-Section, A
Dip Angle,
Horizontal Permeability, k h
30.48 m
2
5000 ft
0
464.52 m
0
200 mD
-13
Porosity, f
Connate Water Saturation, S wc
15%
1.97x10 m
15%
20%
20%
30%
30%
5%
5%
80%
80%
0%
0%
20%
20%
2800.0 psia
19.31 Mpa
Datum
Reservoir Temperature, T r
8500 ft
2591 m
234F
112.2C
40
4x10 psi
Water Compressibility, c w
3x10 psi
40
-6
-1
5.80x10 kPa
-7
-1
-6
-1
4.35x10 kPa
-7
-1
191
EGO SYAHRIAL
The relative permeability curves are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The reservoir domain is discretised by
4020 grid blocks with a production well and a injector well at the extremas. Total number of active grid
blocks is 800 and each gridblock contains 401 RBBL
of hydrocarbon pore volume. It was assumed that production and injection
wells penetrate all layers with oil production rate of 200 STB/Day and Minimum bottom hole pressure of 2000 psia.
Down-dip production well with an oil
rate of 200 STB/Day penetrates all layers and up-dip gas injection with the
composition listed in Table 4 is used as
the gas cycling processes. In this section the effect of permeable zone ordering and kv/kh ratios on the final oil
recovery are examined.
A. Effect of Decreasing Permeability with Depth on Gravity
Segregation
dipping reservoirs is investigated. Reservoir permeability is considered to decrease with depth. This is a
typical of a deltaic bar deposits where both permeability and porosity are decreasing with depth. The
detailed shapes are based on energy for sorting sedi-
Figure 2
Gas-oil Relative Permeability Curves
Table 3
Fluid Compositions and Properties at Reservoir Conditions
Component
Mole Frac.
T c (F)
p c (psia)
Zc
MW
P ch
CO 2
0.0103
88.79
1071.33
0.2741
44.01
0.225
78.0
N2
0.0055
-232.51
492.31
0.2912
28.01
0.040
41.0
C1
0.3647
-116.59
667.78
0.2847
16.04
0.013
77.0
C2
0.0933
90.10
708.34
0.2846
30.07
0.099
108.0
C3
0.0885
205.97
618.70
0.2775
44.10
0.152
150.3
C4
0.0600
295.43
543.45
0.2772
58.12
0.196
187.2
C5
0.0378
378.95
487.17
0.2688
72.15
0.241
228.9
C6
0.0356
461.93
484.38
0.2754
84.00
0.250
271.0
0.3043
836.63
266.33
0.2398
200.00
0.648
520.0
C7
Table 4
Composition of the Dry Injection Gas
192
Dry Gas
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7+
Mole Frac.
0.70
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.23
EGO SYAHRIAL
Figure 3
GOR vs Time in a Dipping Reservoir with Decreasing Permeability
Figure 4
Np vs Time in a Dipping Reservoir with Decreasing Permeability
Figure 5
GOR vs Time in a Dipping Reservoir with Increasing Permeability
193
EGO SYAHRIAL
Figure 6
Np vs Time in a Dipping Reservoir with Increasing Permeability
Figure 7
Gas Saturation Distribution with Decreasing Permeability
Figure 8
Gas Saturation Distribution with Increasing Permeability
EGO SYAHRIAL
Figure 9
Total Mole Fraction after 500 days at the Uppermost Layer
Figure 10
Total Mole Fraction after 500 days at the Bottom Layer
EGO SYAHRIAL
8.
9.
10.
11.
REFERENCES
1. Acs, G., Doleschall, S. and Farkas, E.: General
Purpose Compositional Model, SPE J. (1985),
543.
2. Archer, J.S. and Wall, C.G.: Petroleum Engineering, Principles and Practice, Graham and Trotman,
London (1986).
3. Branco, C.M. and Rodriguez, F.: A Semi-Implicit Formulation for Compositional Reservoir
Simulation, paper SPE 27053, Proc. III Latin
American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference of SPE, Buenos Aries, Argentina, (April 27-29, 1994).
4. Chien, M.C.H., Lee, S.T. and Chen, W.H.: A
New Fully Implicit Compositional Simulator,
paper SPE 13385, Proc. SPE 1985 Reservoir
Simulation Symposium held in Dallas, Texas, (Feb.
10-13, 1985).
5. Coats, K.H.: An Equation Of State Compositional Model, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (Oct. 1980), 363376.
6. Collins, D.A., Nghiem, L.X. and Li, Y.K.: An
Efficient Approach to Adaptive-Implicit Compositional Simulation with an Equation of State, SPE
Res. Eng. (May 1992), 259-264.
7. Coats, K.H. and Smart, G.T.: Application Of A
Regression Based EOS PVT Programe To Laboratory Data, paper SPE 11197, Proc. 57th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of
196
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
EGO SYAHRIAL
18. Siti, B., Vignati, L. And Usilaku, A.: High Recovery in a Volatile Oil Reservoir Case History, Proc. Int. Meet. Pet. Eng., (1992), 293303.
19. Spivak, A.: Gravity Segregation in Two-Phase
Displacement Processes, Soc. Pet. Eng. J.,
December 1974, 619-627.
20. Syahrial, E.: Development of a Novel Compositional Simulation Approach to Model Recovery
from Volatile Oil Reservoirs. PhD Thesis, Imperial College of London, 1997.
21. Syahrial, E. and Daltaban, T.S.: A New Compositional Simulation Approach to Model Recovery from Volatile Oil Reservoirs, paper SPE
39757, the 1998 SPE Asia Pacific Conference
on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management
held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 23-24 March
1998.
197
Jl. Cileduk Raya Kav. 109, Cipulir, Kebayoran Lama, Jakarta Selatan 12230, INDONESIA
Tromol Pos: 6022/KBYB-Jakarta 12120, Telephone: 62-21-7394422 ext.1420, Facsimile: 62-21-7246150,
Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Integrating petrographic core information into combined core petrophysics, log, and
well test data for understanding facies and environmental deposition in rock characterization has proved itself useful to improving quality and reliability of the required conclusions. This integrated approach has specifically shown its use in the cases of complex
reservoirs such ones characterized as low-permeability sandstone reservoirs. It is in this
spirit that this paper demonstrates how this virtually cost efficient analysis provides preliminary recommendations for the exploitation of such reservoirs. As case study, two types
of producing reservoirs (Bekasap, Bangko, Pematang, and Tanjung Formations) have
been taken in 2009. The first type is strongly controlled by depositional environment. It is
found in the upper part of Bekasap and Bangko formations (1900 - 2300 ft-ss), deposited
in estuarine system, and made of very fine to fine grained sand with low to moderate
bioturbation. This mostly feldspathic and lithic greywackes have permeability of up to 200
mD. The second type is strongly dominated by diagenesis process and is mainly found in
the Upper Pematang and Tanjung Formations (6200 - 7400 ft-ss). This reservoir type is
characterized by its coarse-grained and conglomeratic sandstones resulted from fan-delta
and braided channel depositional system. Diagenetic events such as compaction, recrystallization of matrix into microcrystalline clay minerals, precipitation of authigenic minerals in pore system are also well identified from the performed petrographic analysis. This is
dominated by sublitharenite and litharenite sandstones exhibit horizontal permeability of
up to several dozens mD. The two producing reservoir types have undergone carefully
planned exploitation and stimulation operations, and the horizontal drilling and fracturing job for the type-1 and type-2 reservoirs, respectively, are acknowledged as two success
stories of their own. These successes would not prevail without application of well integrated core-log-well test approaches in reservoir characterization, in which information
from core petrography plays an important contribution.
Keywords: reservoir characterization, sandstone, low permeability, petrography
I. INTRODUCTION
Indonesias oil and condensate reached its maximum production in 1977 and 1995 of about 1.5 BOPD.
Indonesias oil production has declined in recent years,
198
mainly due to maturation of its existing fields. Recently the oil production is about 950 thousand
BOPD1. One of the available techniques in increasing oil recovery rates is by production optimization in
low permeability reservoirs; therefore integrated approach in detailed reservoir characterization is needed.
Several studies have been accomplished in describing the controlled of geological factors in production of hydrocarbons. According to Davies2 geological factors such as structural position, lithology,
grain size, sorting, shaliness, pore-geometry play important roles in controlling the fundamental reservoir
parameters including porosity, permeability, and saturation. Pettijohn et al.3 found out that the relationship
between rock characteristic and reservoir quality in
term of porosity, especially permeability is highly influenced by textures and sedimentary structures.
Textures include grain size, sorting, compactness, and
packing of the reservoir framework grains, whereas
sedimentary structures comprise of bioturbation, cross
lamination and parallel laminations, and ripple marks.
Pittman4 based on petrographic study has determined
the relationship between the type of porosity and reservoir quality and potential log calculation problem
and well completion. Syed5 and Civan6 have both
described that the development of clastic reservoir
quality is influenced by depositional environment.
According to Cade et.al.7 permeability increases with
the increased of grain size and grain sorting coefficient. Evans et al.8 has also explained the correlation
of type and size of porosity, grain size, sorting and
diagenesis and porosity and permeability enhancement.
This paper demonstrates that the application of
integrated petrographic analysis and petrophysic, log
and well-test data would produce major advances in
giving preliminary recommendation for exploitation
development strategic and also production optimization. Integrated petrographic data is very useful for
evaluating the relationship between depositional environment, mineralogy composition, pore geometry,
diagenesis, and reservoir quality, which lead to better
perspective in reservoir modelling. Therefore, the reservoir model can be applied in other reservoirs with
similar characteristics. Two types of producing reservoirs including Tanjung Formation in Barito Basin,
East Kalimantan and Pematang and upper part of
Bekasap and Bangko Formations in Central Sumatra
Basin were the objects in the study.
II. METHODS
Thin section petrographic supported by scanning
electron microscope (SEM) and x-ray diffraction
(XRD) analysis were the main techniques in reservoir characterization. The results of the analysis were
then combined with data from the megascopic core
description, log, and well-test. The integrated petrography study was performed in LEMIGAS in 2009.
Thin sections prepared and taken from the conventional cores were cut 2 cm thick and impregnated
with blue-dyed epoxy resin to maintain the existing
natural porosities of the rock samples and to recognize porosity under the microscope. Petrographic
point-count analysis of the thin section was carried
out to quantitatively determined grain compositions
(both primary and secondary origins) and visual porosity percentages. An average of 400 grains, including grain composition and porosity percentages were
counted per thin section. Pore geometry, types and
its distribution and type of sensitive minerals and their
occurences and distribution (especially clay) were
also observed using SEM. SEM analysis was applied
to examine the geometry of the pore systems and to
determine the type and distribution of sensitive minerals, especially for understanding mode of occurrences of the authigenic minerals pattern such as clays
and cements within pore systems. XRD analyses were
prepared for all samples to semi-quantitatively-quantitatively determine the whole rock (bulk analysis) and
clay mineralogy in terms of weight percent of the
whole rock.
III. RESULTS
Based on lithology characteristic, the Bekasap
and Bangko Formations are differentiated into upper
and lower parts. The upper part known as low permeability reservoir, strongly controlled by the depositional environment, so called reservoir type-1. On the
other hand, the lower part with thicknesses varied
from 10 to 20 ft shows better reservoir quality, composed of cross bedded and massive sandstones with
slight bioturbation, conglomeratic fine grained sand.
The lower parts of the Bekasap and Bangko Formations generally show distinct or erosional boundaries with fining upward trend (Figure 1a and 1e).
Gamma-ray log is 58 API and resistivity is 80 ohm
and 60 API and resistivity of 30-60 ohm respectively.
However, cased hole resistivity formation (CHRF)
logs show resistivity is 20 ohm. This is an indication
that the lower part of the formation is a depleted oil
zone. According to logs data and routine-core analysis the amount of Vshale is 18% and horizontal perme199
Figure 1
Reservoir characterization of the upper part of the Bekasap Formation.
200
Figure 2
Relationship between permeability and depositional environment
including grain size and bioturbation
(He-HZ. Perm: Helium horizontal permeability)
Figure 3
Relationship between clay matrix and bioturbation and permebaility
(He-HZ. Perm: Helium horizontal permeability)
201
ously, would comprehend the correlation between lithology characteristics of the reservoirs and hydrocarbon production efficiency and also in recommending and planning strategic and technology to be used
in production optimization, especially in low permeability reservoirs.
Geological factors controlling low permeability
need to be identified, that is controlled by the depositional environment or diagenesis or combination of
both. This study revealed that there is a correlation
between geological factors controlling low permeability with the technology used for the production
optimization. Based on drilling and production data
for the reservoirs type-1 and type-2, the production
optimization strategy for low permeability reservoir
mainly caused by the depositional environment is
achieved by horizontal drilling. On the other hand,
the fracturing job is the optimum technique to increase
Figure 4
Reservoir characterization of conglomeratic sandstone of low permeability Pematang Formation.
a. Logs and conventional core, b. Cross plots of porosity against permeability,
c. Diagenetic process including compaction, shown by planar and semi-sutured grain contacts,
d. Kaolinite cementation
202
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
V. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Authors would like to thank managements of
KKKS Chevron Pacific Indonesia, Pertamina EP, and
EMP Malacca Strait for supporting the data. This
article is published by the permission of the management of BPMIGAS.
REFERENCES
1.
Evans, J., Cade, C., and Bryant, S., 1997, A Geological Approach to Permeability Prediction
in Clastic Reservoir, in Kupecz, J.A., Gluyas,
J.G., and Bloch, S., eds., Reservoir Quality Prediction in Sandstones and Carbonates; AAPG
Memoir 69, p.91-101.
203
EMI YULIARITA
ABSTRACT
Pure Plant Oil (PPO) which is made from kisamir seed has smaller kinetic viscosity
value than jatropha and coconut oil. So it has potential to be used as alternative fuel/
mixed kerosene.
The test result of some main physical/chemical characteristics of fuel made from kerosine and pure plant oil (5% to 20% volume) are still in the limit of kerosene specification
as decided by the government. However, the maximum power test result of the mixture of
PPO and kerosene that has been tested on 16 wicks stove shows that the higher content of
PPO in kerosene will decrease the maximum stove performance as well as stoves efficiency
value. But the blue color of fire gets clearer, because of less amount of sulfur by adding
PPO in kerosene. The use of PPO up to 20% will reduce sulphur content up to 20%.
Key Word: PPO, Kerosine Alternatif fuel, Spesification, Maksimum Power, Efficiency stove
I. INTRODUCTION
Kerosene is one of liquid fuels; produced by atmospheric distillation process of crude oil, it is one of
fuels subsidized by government in Indonesia. The common utilization of kerosene is as household fuel, where
it is used for stoves, whether wick stove or pressure
stove.
The domestic supply of kerosene in
Indonesia is dicreasing. This situation is caused
by goverment program of conversion of the use of
kerosene to LPG as household fuel. However, the
national demand of household fuel consumption in national energy policy of 2010 as stated is still considerable; where natural kerosene demand is predicted to
be up to 10 million kilo liter. Usually, kerosene is used
as household fuel on the stove, whether wick stove
or pressure stove. Beside that, kerosene is also used
as fuel for industry .
The purpose of this research is to study the use
pure plant oil (PPO) as an alternative fuel that substitutes kerosene in line with Indonesian energy diversification and conservation acceleration policy and
204
to understand how well is the performance of mixtures of PPO and kerosene on wick stove.
Test result evaluation is done by comparing main
biokerosene characteristics test result with kerosene
specification requirement. Performance test was done
by comparing the performance of bio kerosene with
that of kerosene.
II. LITERATURE OBSERVATION
A. Kerosene
Kerosene is colorless and clear distillated fuel,
which is the product of petroleum refining (asmopheric
distillation) with boiling point from 1500 C to 3100 C
and other physical and chemical characteristics that
fit the specification required by the government as
declared in Directorate General of Oil and Gas Decree No. 17 K/72/DDJM/1999 of April 16, 1999.
B. Pure Plant Oil (PPO)(2, 3)
Pure plant oil is the oil produced from plants and
well known as renewable and environmentally friendly
fuel. When used as fuel, this plant oil is also known
EMI YULIARITA
Explaination :
1. Wick
2. Kerosene tank
3. Wick pipe
4. Outside Nest Fire Managing Mechanism
5. Outside Nest
6. Firing Room
7. Inside Nest
8. Cover
9. Pan Holder
Figure 1
The Wicks Stove
III. METHODOLOGY
Performance test of Kisamir Pure Plant Oil
(PPO) and kerosene mixture as wick stoves fuel is
done by making alternative fuel (biokerosene) with
volume percentage, mixture variation such as 0%,
5%, 15%, and 20%. Each biokerosene sample is given
a code (BK-0, BK-5, BK-10, BK-15, and BK-20).
Then, main physical and chemical characteristics
(such as kinematic viscosity, density, flash point, smoke
point, sulfur content, and calorific value) area tested
using kerosene fuel specification as reference. After
that, parameters of wick stoves fuel performance
are measured namely maximum power, fuel consumption, and stove efficiency. Next, evaluation of
physical-chemical characteristics and stove performance test results are conducted by comparing the
results for all samples.
IV. RESULT AND EVALUATION
A. Physical and Chemical characteristics test
result
Comparison of kisamir seeds PPO characteristics test result with coconut and jatropha oil are
shown on Table 2. Composition of PPO mixure and
kerosine as kerosine alternative fuel, are shown in
Table 3.
206
Next, kerosene samples physical/chemical characteristics analysis result are compared with
kerosenes specification accordance to Oil and Gas
General Directorate Decree No. 17K/DDJM/1999,
of April 16, 1999, shown in Table 4.
Table 2 shows that Kisamir seeds PPO physical/chemical characteristics are almost same as that
of jatrophas PPO physical/chemical characteristics,
or coconut. Kisamir seeds PPO is thinner then the
others and it has lower kinematic viscosity value than
of jatrophas PPO or coconuts. So kisamir seeds
PPO can be utilized for alternative fuel to substitute
kerosene.
Table 4 shows that the result of physical/chemical characteristics test of mixed alternative fuel of
PPO and kerosene, meet kerosene specification required on Decree of Oil and Gas General Directorate No. 17K/DDJM/1999 of April 16, 1999. The results of sulfur content test from each alternative fuel
very from 0.028% wt to 0.0336% wt, and the reference of kerosenes sulfur content is 0.0351% wt. It
shows that utilising 20% volume of PPO kisamir seed
in mixture with kerosene can reduce 20% sulfur content. It has positive effect to the environment.
B. The Result of Performance Test
Performance test was conducted on a wick stove
and with 20 cm diameter pan in line with World Bank
EMI YULIARITA
Table 4
Result of Physical/Chemical Characteristics of
No.
Kind of Test
Limit
Specification*)
Min - Max
Density (Kg/cm3)
0,835
BK-05
BK10
BK-15
BK-20
0.806
0.812
0.817
0.822
0.828
38
47
45
44
43
43
15
21
23
25
28
30
40
45.88
45.41
44.81
44.74
44.20
0.20
0.035
0.034
0.030
0.029
0.028
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
Explaination:
*) Kerosenes specification fits with Oil & Gas General Directorat Decree No. 17/K/DDJM/1999, April 16, 1999
Table 5
The Result of Each PPO and Kerosene Alternative Fuel Mixture Performance Test
BIOKEROSENE SAMPLE
NO.
OBSERVATION
UNIT
BK-00
BK-05
BK-10
BK-15
BK-20
Kj/kg
45880
45410
44810
44740
44200
Kg/hour
0,1976
0,1497
0,1377
0,1257
0,1138
1.
Fuel Calorie
2.
Fuel Consumption
3.
Water Mass
kg
2,17
2,17
2,17
2,17
2,17
4.
kg
0,03
0,042
0,044
0,047
--
5.
Maximum Power
kw
2,52
1,89
1,72
1,57
1,33
6.
Boiling Efficiency
48,18
34,77
32,88
31,53
--
7.
8.
Fire Stability
9.
minute
24
26
36
burned a little
burned a little
burned a little
burned a little
good
good
< BK-05
< BK-15
easy
easy
A little hard
A little hard
hard
The more PPO of kisamir seed used in the mixture, the smaller calorie value and maximum power.
2. The Result of Efficiency Test (4)
Stove efficiency is the comparison among useable
heat, which is needed to cook some food in certain
208
30
EMI YULIARITA
Table 7
Analysis result of stove efficiency
of Biokerosene
No.
Calorie BB
Kind of Fuel
(kj/kg)
Table 8
Analysis result of fuel consumption
of Biokerosene
Efficiency
No.
(%)
1.
BK - 00
45880
48.18
2.
BK - 05
45410
34.77
3.
BK 10
44810
32.88
4.
BK 15
44740
31.53
5.
BK 20
44206
Amount of
Fuel
PPO in
Time
Consumption
Kerosene (minute)
(kg/Jam)
(% vol.)
1.
10
0.1976
2.
10
0.1497
3.
10
10
0.1377
4.
15
10
0.1257
5.
20
10
0.1138
Figure 4
The relation of fuel consumption and maximum power
210
REFERENCES
A. Summary
The result of PPO and kerosene mixture performance test as the fuel on multi-wicks stove can be
summarized as follow:
1. PPO made from Kisamir seeds has potential to
develop as bio fuel material, because it has low
viscosity.
2. The mixture of 20% volume PPO in kerosene
can reduce the sulfur content to 20% of wt.
3. The mixture with more than 20% volume PPO in
kerosene shows lowest maximum power and
stove efficiency.
4. The higher amount of PPO being used in the mixture, the lower stoves maximum Power and
stoves efficiency.
2. http://www.ybiofuels.org/bio-fuels/hystorybiofuels.html
3. http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minya Nabati
4. La Puppung Pallawagau Ir., 1989, Test Eficiency
and Power of Kerosene Wicks Stove, R&D Center for Oil and Gas Technology LEMIGAS,
Jakarta.
5. SII 0135-76, Quality and Wick Kerosene Stove
Test.
6. Specification as declared in Directorate General
of Oil and Gas Decree No. 17K/72/DDJM/1999
of April 16, 1999.
B. Suggestion
For the best result of stove maximum power and
efficiency, it would be better to add PPO that has a
lower viscosity (less than 20 Cst)
211
ABSTRACT
Poor lubrication may cause wear on the surface moving parts of engine components such as
bearings due to the metal-to-metal contact. Engine components utilized on the road-test of gasoline engines lubricating oil API SL showed wear and tear on some parts of them. The sum of
wear occurred during the road test were varied. Therefore, an analysis of wear quantity of
engines components was a necessity in order to get information about lubrication condition on
engine. Analysis of wear was conducted by components rating based on the standard specifications set out for performance level of lubricant oil API SL and ILSAC GF-3 (SNI 06-7069-2005).
Analysis based on Seq. IIIF showed that average value of the piston skirt varnish is 10, low
temperature viscosity is 4673 cP, and cam wear lifter is 0.002 mm. It was also showed that the
minimum kinematics viscosity increase was managed to be stay-in-grade. Analysis based on
Seq. IVA showed that the average value of cam wear is 0.0015 mm. Analysis based on Seq. VII
showed that the value of bearing weight loss was 0.010 g and there was no deposit at high
temperatures. Shear stability analysis based on Seq. VIII showed that the viscosity of lubricant
oil is still in the range of allowed values.
Key words: rating; gasoline engine components; API SL lubricating oil
I. INTRODUCTION
Lubricating oil is an important matter in the operation of motor vehicle engines. The rapid development of engine technology requires the use of lubricating oil with better quality so that lubricant can still
provide good performance in a variety of extreme
conditions, such as very high operating temperatures,
higher operating pressure, the possibility of impurities entry and many other disorders arising from the
environment. Lubricating oil quality is indicated by
the physical-chemical characteristics while the actual quality of performance is demonstrated by the
actual work on machinery/equipment used. Some international standards are used to indicate the quality
of lubricating oil, such as API Service, SAE, JASO
and ILSAC. However the most actual quality can be
detected by analyzing the ratings of the vehicle engine parts through road test.
212
Lubricating oil formula used in this studi was gasoline engine lubricating oil API SL recommended for
gasoline engine technology of 2001. This type of lubricating oil can also be used for earlier automotive
engine technologies. This paper precent the result of
lubricating oil performance studies conducted through
road test, with the use of the new Lemigas formulated gasoline engine lubricating oil SAE 15W40/API
SL. Performance test was conducted with a 2006
Toyota Innova which recommends the use of lubricating oil to the level of quality performance API SJ
or SL. The test vehicle was run to reach 15,000 km
mileage.
The research was aimed at determining the performance of lubricating oil Lemigas formulated formula SAE 15W40/API SL on the vehicle. Rating
analysis of the engine components that was made
Figure 1
Piston thrust side, pin piston and ring piston
on the new set and the end of the road test (15,000
km), i.e. the diameter of the piston and the wear
marks, particularly on his side thrust. Piston pin diameter was measured to determine wear of the piston pin. Cracks on the piston and piston ring liner
(ring gap) were measured to determine the wear after 15,000 km usage. Piston rings, particularly compression (ring no.1 and no. 2), wee weighed to determine the wear ring after 15,000 km.
Occurrence of wear of the piston sets can lead
to reduced ability of machines to produce maximum
energy. Results of analysis of the four piston ratings
show the same dimension values before and after
the road test. Good lubrication performance can reduce friction thereby reducing wear of metals.
Analysis of the piston pin was carried out to know
weight loss after implementation of the road test. Piston pin weight losses are very small namely is an
average of 0.0015 grams, so the value of the wear
on the piston pin is considered normal. Visually on
the piston pin there are no visible hot spots (bluish
color) that indicate the occurrence of inter-metal
touches.
Engine piston ring is a component that serves as
seal between the combustion chamber with the lubricants crankcase (Figure 1). A load charge received
by the piston ring is usually very high so that dimensional changes occur and the wear is an
important parameter that must be observed. The results show that there is
wear of the piston ring, indicated by the
occurrence of weight loss. Average
weight loss of each piston ring amounted
Figure 2
Piston ring side clearance
213
Ring Gap
Figure 3
Ring gap measurement
Figure 4
Piston condition (Skirt Varnish)
Table 1
Ring gap analysis
Ring
1a
1b
2a
2b
3a
3b
4a
4b
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.60
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
Ref.
214
Table 2
Skirt varnish and deposit analysis
Piston 1
Piston 2
Piston 3
Piston 4
Ring Sticking
10
10
10
10
Skirt Condition
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
Crown Cutting
10
10
10
10
Rating
Groove Filling
Land deposit
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.6
10
10
8.6
10
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.1
8.6
8.6
8.9
8.7
10
10
10
10
Table 3
Conrod bearing rating
Position
1b
2a
2b
3a
3b
4a
4b
Top
13.287
13.287
13.192
13.191
13.298
13.298
13.214
13.213
Bottom
13.282
13.281
13.152
13.151
13.305
13.305
13.314
13.314
Remark :
a = new part (0 km)
b = used part (15.000 km)
showed no change, i.e. 5.11 bar. Compression pressure that remains good will indicate the condition of
the combustion chamber is still in accordance with
standard conditions, so that the engine is able to provide optimum performance.
Piston Skirt Varnish and Deposit
The results on the skirt varnish and deposits that
formed on the piston shows characteristics of some
parameters of the condition of the piston component
after the execution of road tests (Table 2).
Piston skirt varnish rating results show that the
value of the component ratings are satisfactory to
meet the ILSAC GF-3 Sequence IIIF, the 9.0 minimum. It is also apparent in the physical condition of
the pistons that are clear of deposits and varnish (Figure 4). Piston skirt are in good condition with a value
rating of 9.5 that indicates the condition of the wear
Figure 5
Connecting rod Bearing Kijang Innova 2006
Figure 6
Camshaft
216
Figure 7
Camshaft follower condition after road-test
Table 4
Camshaft component rating
Inlet
a
(mm)
42.925
Inlet
b
(mm)
42.925
Outlet
a
(mm)
42.925
Outlet
b
(mm)
42.925
42.915
42.915
42.935
42.930
42.925
42.923
42.935
42.932
42.915
42.915
42.935
42.932
42.915
42.915
42.935
42.933
No.
42.915
42.913
42.935
42.935
42.925
42.920
42.935
42.932
42.915
42.915
42.935
42.933
Remark:
a = new part (0 km)
b = used part (15.000 km)
Table 5
Analysis of wear of the camshaft follower
No.
Inlet (m m )
Outlet (m m )
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
16.995
Oil Screen
Oil screen is very important component to ensure the cleanliness of lubricating oil that circulates in
the engine is in clean condition (Figure 8). Analyses
of these components are conducted to determine
whether there is a blockage or are still in good condition. This parameter can be found by doing an oil
screen weighing. The results show that the condition
of oil and the screen still does not show blockages.
This is detected from the result of oil weighing a fixed
screen, which is 279.84 grams. This is in accordance
with the restrictions in the standard test sequence
VG ILSAC GF-3, which should not happen in the oil
screen clogging.
Summary results of the analysis and rating engine components made with reference to the specification of performance parameters specified for the
level of lubricating oil of API SL and ILSAC GF-3
(Table 8).
Oil Filter
Oil filter function is to filter out the impurities
brought by the lubricating oil (Figure 9). Oil filters,
does its function to filter sludge, dust and metal wear.
Blockage on the lubricating oil filter may cause the
lubricant not to circulate properly so as not to be capable of providing excellent lubrication performance.
The results show the existence of impurities retained
on the filter, amounting to 2.62 grams. This amount is
classified as very small and not to cause filter clogging, so it is still safe to use.
a. Sequence IIIF
Study results showed that lubricating oil drain interval SAE 15W40 API SL through the road test can
give a good performance and test standards sequence
III F (Table 8).
b. Sequence IVA
Testing sequence IVA is conducted to determine
the wear characteristics. Wear value is limited by its
Table 6
Measurements oil filter
Weight (gram)
Weight (gram)
(new part - 0 km) (used part - 15.000 km)
248.87
Table 7
Sludge dan varnish formation analysis
Figure 8
Oil Screen Kijang Innova 2006
251.49
No
Clean
Clean
Valve cover
Clean
Clean
Oil filter
Clean
Figure 9
Oil filter
217
Figure 10
Sludge and varnish formation
Table 8
Lubricating oil analysis based on the level
and quality of API SL ILSAC GF-3
Te s t Param e te rs
Standard
Value
Se q. IIIF
Average piston skirt varnish
Minimum cinematic viscosity increase
Low temperature viscosity, cP
9.0
10.0
Stay in grade
Stay in grade
7000 max
4673
0.002
No w ear
0.12
0.0015
0.0264
0.010
45
218
Te s t Value
Figure 11
Cam lobes wear
219
SUBJECT INDEX
A
M
misleading petrophysical data 165
maksimum Power 210
P
petrography 198, 199
petrochemical industry 204, 205
PPO 210, 211, 213, 214, 215, 217
R
reservoir characterization 198, 199, 203
rating 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 225
S
Spesification 210
T
H
heterogeinity 180
K
kerosine alternatif fuel 210
AUTHORS INDEX
Munadi, Suprajitno, AVO INVERSION USING LEVENBERG-MARQUARDT OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE, 33 (2) : 98 - 105
Morina, see, Nasution, A.S., 33 (2) : 143 - 150
Morina, see, Nasution, A.S., 33 (3) : 204 - 209
N
Nasution, A.S., PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, 33 (2) : 143 - 150
Nasution, A.S., THE CHEMISTRY OF NATURAL GAS, 33 (3) : 204 - 209
P
Pasarai, Usman, WORKSHEET SCREENING OF CO2 EOR SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL IN INDONESIA, 33 (1) : 10 - 34
Pasarai, Usman, see, Syahrial, Ego, 33 (2) : 129 - 134
Purba, Humbang, see, Munadi, Suprajitno, 33 (2) : 98 - 105
Pratama I., Utomo, see, Pasarai, Usman, 33 (1) : 10 - 34
Pratama I., Utomo, see, Sugihardjo, 33 (3) : 180 - 187
Prasetyo, Hadi, see, Musu, Junita Trivianty, 33 (3) : 198 - 203
R
Rahman, Maizar, INDONESIAS REFINING DEVELOPMENTS: FUTURE PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES, 33 (2) : 91 - 97
S
Sismartono, Danang, see, Pasarai, Usman, 33 (1) : 10 - 34
Syahrial, Ego, UNDERSTANDING CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (CCS) POTENTIAL IN INDONESIA, 33 (2) : 129 - 134
Syahrial, Ego, MODELING GRAVITY SEGREGATION IN STRATIFIED AND DIPPING RESERVOIR
OF VOLATILE OIL, 33 (3) : 188 - 197
Subiyanto, see, Widodo, Setyo, 33 (3) : 218 - 225
Sari H., Shinta, Widodo, Setyo, 33 (3) : 218 - 225
Soelistijono, Marzuki, see, Usman, 33 (2) : 120 - 128
Susantoro, Tri Muji, OIL SPILL POLLUTION DETECTION USING PALSAR DATA IN TIMOR SEA,
33 (2) : 135 - 142
Suliantara, see, Susantoro, Tri Muji, 33 (2) : 135 - 142
Sunardjanto, Djoko, see, Susantoro, Tri Muji, 33 (2) : 135 - 142
Sugihardjo, TRACER TESTS FOR HETEROGENEITY CHARACTERIZATION AND SATURATION DETERMINATION ON CORE FLOODING, 33 (3) : 180 - 187
U
Usman, STUDY ON PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT OF LOW PERMEABILITY GAS RESERVOIR
BY HYDRAULIC FRACTURING, 33 (2) : 120 - 128
Usman, see, Sugihardjo, 33 (3) : 180 - 187
W
Widarsono, Bambang, see, Musu, Junita Trivianty, 33 (1) : 10 - 34
Widarsono, Bambang, DIFFERENTIAL STRAIN ANALYSIS: AN INVESTIGATION OVER ITS FEASIBILITY FOR DETERMINING COALS CLEAT ORIENTATION, 33 (2) : 106 - 114
Widarsono, Bambang, AN INVESTIGATION OVER ROCK WETTABILITY AND ITS ALTERATION
ON SOME INDONESIAN SANDSTONES, 33 (3) : 165 - 179
Widarsono, Bambang, see, Musu, Junita Trivianty, 33 (3) : 198 - 203
Widodo, Setyo, STUDY ON COMPONENTS RATING OF GASOLINE ENGINE AS A PERFORMANCE
QUALITY INDICATOR OF API SL LUBRICANT, 33 (3) : 218 - 225
Y
Yuliarita, Emi, PERFORMANCE TESTING ON MIXTURE OF KISAMIR PURE PLANT OIL (PPO)
AND KEROSENE AS WICK STOVE FUEL, 33 (3) : 210 - 217
Yuliani R., Catur, see, Widodo, Setyo, 33 (3) : 218 - 225
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We would like to convey our gratitude to Peer Group, Senior Editos, and Editors who
have assisted and edited articles in Lemigas Scientific Contributions (LSC) Volume 33 (no:
1, 2 and 3)
I. Peer Group
1. Prof. Dr. Ir. Septoratno Siregar (Petroleum Engineering)
2. Prof. Dr. Wahjudi Wisaksono (Energy and Environment)
3. Prof. Dr. R.P. Koesoemadinata (Geological Engineering)
4. Ir. E. Jasjfi, M.Sc, APU. (Chemical Engineering)
5. Dr. Ir. M. Kholil, M.Kom. (Management of Environment)
II. Senior Editors
1. Dr. Ir. Noegroho Hadi Hs., APU. (Chemical Engineering)
2. Prof. (R). Dr. Maizar Rahman (Chemical Engineering)
3. Prof. (R). Dr. Suprajitno Munadi (Geophysics)
4. Prof. (R). Dr. E. Suhardono (Industrial Chemistry)
III. Editors
1. Ir. Bambang Wicaksono T.M., M.Sc. (Petroleum Geology)
2. Dr. Ir. Ego Syahrial, M.Sc. (Petroleum Engineering)
3. Prof. (R). M. Udiharto (Biology)
4. Drs. Mardono, MM. (Chemical Engineering)
5. Dr. Usman, M.Eng. (Petroleum Engineering
6. Abdul Haris, S.Si., M.Si. (Chemistry and Environment)
7. Ir. Yusep K Caryana, M.Sc. (Gas Engineering and Management)