Ijm Story
Ijm Story
Ijm Story
PAKISTAN
Islamabad
Karachi
MAURITIUS
CHILE
San Bernado
Santiago
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Houston
Orlando
ARGENTINA
Buenos Aires
UNITED
KINGDOM
London
BAHRAIN
ITALY
Perugia
NAMIBIA
Grootfontein
UAE
Abu Dhabi
Dubai
INDIA
Andra Pradesh
Karnataka
Madya Pradesh
Maharashtra
New Delhi
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
West Bengal
MYANMAR
Yangon
BANGLADESH
CHINA
Changchun
Guangdong
Hong Kong
Jilin
Wuxi
Yangzhong
MALAYSIA
SINGAPORE
VIETNAM
Danang
Ho Chi Minh City
INDONESIA
AUSTRALIA
Gold Coast
Melbourne
Sydney
We Deliver
(2000-to date)
Left to right: Koh Boon Chor (1983-1988), Goh Chye Keat (1988-1996), Krishnan Tan Boon Seng (1997-2010) and Teh Kean Ming (2011-to date)
Produced by
pVm communications sdn bhd 633010-K
www.pvm.com.my
Published by
IJM Corporation Berhad 104131-A
Wisma IJM, Jalan Yong Shook Lin
46050 Petaling Jaya
Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Tel: 603-79858288
Fax: 603-79529388
Website: www.ijm.com
Printed by
Dolphin Press Sdn Bhd 803493-W
Acknowledgement
Abdul Halim bin Ali
Ahmad Azizuddin bin Haji Zainal Abidin
Boey Tak Kong
Goh Chye Keat
Goh Chye Koon
Goh Nan Kioh
Ho Phea Keat
Khor Kiem Teoh, Harry
Koh Boon Chor
Koon Yew Yin
Lee Teck Yuen
Lim Choong Kong
Lim Yong Keat
Neoh Soon Hiong
Oh Chong Peng
Ong Yeng Tian
Ooi Poay Lum
Soam Heng Choon
Teh Kean Ming
Tek Choon Yee, Joseph
Tan Gim Foo
Tan Sin Leong
Tan, Velayuthan
Tengku Ahmad Rithaudeen bin Tengku Ismail
Wilson, David Frederick
Wong Soon Fah
Wong Tet Foh, James
Yahya bin Yaacob
Wan Abdul Rahman bin Wan Yaacob
Wong See Wah
Yap Lim Sen
CONTENTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Lessons in
Leadership-3 120
Lessons in
Leadership-4 130
The Board,
30 years on 140
Minister in the world. Money was pouring into the country, business boomed,
new industries grew up and there was complete peace and harmony in the
The future held a lot of promise for the citizens of the fledgling nation. First, there was the
Malayanisation programme that created wide-ranging jobs, especially in high ranking positions
in administrative and professional services following the departure of British officers. There
was a dire need for qualified Malayans to fill these positions. Education and training became
a top priority, with tertiary and technical education taking precedence as nation-building
became the rallying call of the young federation.
There was no better time for high achieving school leavers aspiring to become engineers,
especially civil engineers who were needed to implement public works projects. To pursue
an engineering degree, it became necessary for many to attend a foreign university. The
University of Malaya, the first university in the country, began with the establishment of the
engineering faculty in 1958, but it had only 40 places available. The rite of passage for most was
to attend the diploma programme offered by the Technical College in Kuala Lumpur before
travelling abroad. Upgraded from a technical school to a college in 1946, it forged a close-knit
community of students in the early years, many from relatively poor families fired by the
burning desire to realise their ambition to become engineers and rise above their current
station in life. This shaped the outlook and values of many Technical College graduates from
the 1950s and 1960s, a few of whom later joined forces to start IJM Corporation in 1983.
10
The main agent of nation building was the Public Works Department (PWD), which was
responsible for both federal and state projects. In the course of the implementation of the
first Malaya Plan (1955-60), the PWD suffered a shortage of planning staff, and it began to
engage with private sector consultants. Despite severe technical manpower shortages, the
nation continued to speed ahead with development projects aimed at narrowing the divide
between urban and rural Malaya; the latter had been neglected by the colonial administration.
Revenues earned on the back of rubber, tin and other agricultural exports were ploughed
back into building new roads, water supply networks, sewerage works, hospitals and clinics,
schools, power generation stations, transmission & distribution lines, and drainage and
irrigation works. Many of these projects received strong financial and technical support from
international agencies such as the World Bank and United Nations affiliates that championed
poverty reduction and self-sufficiency in Third World nations.
The countrys building industry flourished, and it attracted contractors of every stripe and
colour. Historically, contractors were hardy and enterprising migrant Chinese with the street
smarts to work well under the direction of engineers and architects. They were essentially
tradesmen, who ran businesses that were paternalistic, clannish, frugal, and had an appetite
for the high-risk contracting world. Typically, these businesses consisted of the kepala who
would assemble a team, usually family and clan members, who gained experience through an
apprenticeship system.
Surprisingly, few of these tradesmen survived the colonial building frenzy during the tin
and rubber boom of the 19th century and early 20th century. Those who did were late entries
such as Low Yat and Lim Goh Tong who became contractors in the closing years of the British
colonial administration. Lim Goh Tong was a true pioneer, a contractor ahead of his time. His
company, Kien Huat Construction secured the Kemubu Irrigation project in Kelantan that was
funded by the World Bank. After the completion of this project, Lim moved all his resources
to build the now famous Genting Highland Resort in Pahang. These early stalwarts of the
Malaysian construction industry who earned their spurs in the colonial years proceeded
to cultivate the patronage of the new leadership of independent Malaya to strengthen their
positions. In the heady days leading up to independence, Low Yat
and his team worked furiously to build the 10-storey Federal Hotel
along Jalan Bukit Bintang that was to be used to house foreign
The hallmarks of a successful
guests and diplomats invited to attend Malayas independence
celebrations. Another contractor, Lim Chong Hin constructed the
traditional contractor in the early days of
Merdeka Stadium, the venue of the celebration, from where the
the building industry were a Merc, a gun
Tunku officially proclaimed independence with his famous cheer:
and a mistress.
Merdeka! Merdeka! Merdeka!
Lim Yong Keat, co-founder of Jurutama Sdn Bhd
Other prestigious projects to proclaim the new nations
sovereignty followed: the National Mosque, Parliament House,
Subang International Airport, University of Malaya, to name a few. Meanwhile, Tan Chin Nam
won hearts, including that of the Tunku, when he built the countrys first low cost housing in
Kampung Congo in Kuala Lumpur, making the prospect of home ownership among the poor
a reality.
Rural development projects, on the other hand, were a different ball game altogether.
They tended to be driven by international aid agencies who preferred dealing with their
11
12
expertise, Koon invited Technical College buddy and PWD engineer Koh Boon Chor into the
fold. The pooling of resources enabled Chye Hin to qualify as a sub-contractor for the Muda
Irrigation Project, a coveted World Bank-funded project of the Department of Drainage &
Irrigation that consisted of a variety of large and small civil engineering packages awarded
on an open tender basis.
Chye Hin picked up a few lucrative packages, and proved that engineers could run
a construction company well, if not better. As a tribute to the successful completion of its
inaugural project, the company changed its name to Mudajaya Construction Sdn Bhd (a Malay
phrase that translates as success in Muda), with Koon Yew Yin and Koh Boon Chor as joint
managing directors. They were a good match, the entrepreneurial and outgoing Koon squared
off by the methodical technocrat Koh.
Mudajayas new identity also served to distance the company from being associated with
the rough and tumble world of the Chinaman contractor. In all likelihood, the name change
was also a strategic exercise in a Malaysia that was recovering from the 1969 race riots, the
worst in the nations record. In its aftermath, the New Economic Policy was launched in 1971,
and this affirmative action programme sent ripples of unease particularly among the Chinese
business community. Chye Hin must have found it timely to move beyond its communal name
to project a more national image.
Yap, meanwhile, ventured into property development, enticed as a consultant to work on
a housing project for the newly established Ipoh Garden Sdn Bhd or IGB in 1964 by influential
entrepreneur Tan Chin Nam, a rising star both in Malaysia and Singapore. Yap delivered well,
and was appointed managing director, and started to take the company to new heights with
trailblazing projects. In 1981, IGB became one of the earliest real estate companies to become
public listed in Malaysia.
In Kuala Lumpur, another professional construction company was being constituted by
another group of Technical College alumni. They too vied to work on the Muda Irrigation
project, but the birth of their company was complicated.
This team was led by Lim Choong Kong, who had dabbled with construction jobs since
he was a teenager, and gained insight into project management when he interned with
Wimpey Construction of London, one of the largest contractors in the United Kingdom, as
part of an industrial training scholarship. With his hands-on experience, Lim Choong Kong
was accepted for a Masters engineering programme at Southampton University. He was
in the midst of it when he received news of the impending Muda Irrigation Project tender.
Ever the entrepreneur, Lim Choong Kong took a break from his studies to bid for the Muda
Irrigation Project.
His entry point was Soon Tat Construction, a sole proprietorship that belonged to Chow
Soon Tat, a tailor. Chow Soon Tats tailoring shop in Jalan Bangsar was in the neighbourhood
of the Drainage & Irrigation Department, whose officers were his regular customers. Through
his friendship with them, Chow Soon Tat secured a Class A Contractors licence, and won a
13
14
15
PART 1
18
companies who wanted to lead, not play second fiddle to international giants.
They were men who wanted their outfits to stand out and be counted as
first generation professional construction companies, not hereditary family
Mahathirs rationale for Looking East was simple, writes Hng Hung Yong in CEO Malaysia,
Strategy in Nation Building (Pelanduk 1998): After decades of following Western work
practices, he felt it was time to learn from those who had succeeded where the West had
failed. In the 1960s and 1970s, the Japanese economic machine was chugging along nicely in
Europe and America, outperforming homegrown economies in many sectors. Japan was No.
1, and its admirers went trooping to Tokyo to study the Japanese Miracle. Mahathir thought
it was time Malaysians did the same. Look East was thus his wake up call to Malaysians.
The Japanese had shown how competitive advantage could be achieved. The Koreans and
Taiwanese were following suit. It was time to learn discipline, application and innovation
from those who had succeeded.
While justified in some sectors, the Look East policy undermined the local construction
industry. It pitted local firms against well-capitalised Japanese and Korean construction
giants that had surplus capacity and concessionary government loans in bids for multi-million
ringgit construction projects. Two voices of the building industry, the Housing Developers
Association and the Master Builders Association Malaysia, diplomatically expressed their
dismay, with an oblique criticism of Malaysian Government awards of most of its larger
construction projects to the foreign firms.
19
1980s
ooking East
The owners of both companies found a staunch ally in their old Technical College mate Yap
Lim Sen, the managing director of prominent property developer Ipoh Garden Berhad (IGB).
He says: It was absurd that professional companies such as Mudajaya and Jurutama were
working for big ones at half price and not allowed to tender. They had the experience and
the track record but were undercapitalised and could not qualify for big jobs that required
substantial performance bonds. Bold and daring, he decided the time for change had come.
IGB became a public listed company on the Malaysian bourse in 1981, which would gave
it access to the capital market to fund its expansion plans. Ever the visionary, Yap recognised
the bright prospects for a well-managed and efficient construction company for IGB. Fresh
from the listing of IGB, Yap proposed an acquisition exercise that would serve the interest of
all three parties: Mudajaya, Jurutama and IGB Construction, the young construction arm of
his company.
The merger & acquisition (M&A) was to be the prelude to the listing of a new entity that
would give it access to capital markets. Yap is said to have reasoned that this route will enable
20
21
1980s
engineers to concentrate on what they knew best engineering while public listing will give
the company the financial clout to grow.
The idea of public listing had crossed the mind of the successful Mudajaya, but it was
too small to go it alone. Jurutamas growth, unfortunately, was stymied by money woes.
Yap played the role of matchmaker with vested interests. I knew both sides, and thought
why not bring these companies together as a group that would evolve into a public listed
company. The merger also fitted well into IGBs construction agenda. IGB was an urban
property developer that could grow better with the professional experience and skills of
Mudajaya and Jurutama.
He won the confidence of Mudajayas management, with whom
he had a long association. Next, he approached Jurutamas managing
director Lim Choong Kong with: Outsiders are getting good jobs and
good money. We should as well! It worked.
All three companies aspired to build Malaysias largest
professional engineering and construction firm with the resources
to ride the construction boom they could see coming in Malaysia. It
was an exciting proposition, with each company bringing to the table
different skills sets and experience. Indeed, the merger would create
an entity with capabilities that covered the entire engineering and
construction spectrum, backed by the financial muscle of IGB. It would
catapult them to the league of foreign competitors, to work hand-inhand with them, not for them. Better still, it would have the financial
and operational might to bid for large scale projects on merit.
Mudajaya came with a strong track record for infrastructure
projects such as irrigation, interstate highways and water supply
networks. After the Muda Irrigation Project, it had ventured to the
East Coast where few contractors were willing to go. It participated
in joint ventures with Japanese and Korean companies, and forged a
strong relationship with the Japanese Development Corporation, who
later became its international partner.
In Pahang, it constructed the first package of the Bahau-Keratong
Highway while in Terengganu, it built the petroleum supply base
for the Kemaman Port. It was also appointed by a Korean turnkey
contractor to build a tank farm for the newly formed Petronas.
Another Terengganu project was the construction of hydroelectric
saddle dams with the Japanese. The company later went on to build
the Upper Pierce Dam in Singapore, the Lumut Naval Dockyard and
the APMC cement plant in Rawang.
Jurutamas areas of specialisation were urban infrastructure, housing and
manufacturing. In the post-Muda Irrigation Project period, it used its Kedah experience
to secure contracts to build urban roads and schools in the state capital of Alor
Setar. The drainage and irrigation experience proved useful in securing contracts for
reclamation works in Sungai Perai, Penang and the coastal bund for the North Klang
Straits Industrial Estate. The latter resulted in the usage of an 8-km long conveyor belt
system, the longest and the first of its kind for a reclamation project in Malaysia.
Other Klang Valley projects included the Jalan Ipoh
overpass, the Federal Highway upgrading works in Selangor,
the parking apron of Subang International Airport and the
Kuala Lumpur sewerage system. In Sarawak, it was awarded
Consulting firm Minconsults founder P. Ganendra once
the civil works contract for Shells crude oil terminal in
remarked that if Jurutama wants to cheat you, it will ask your
Bintulu, where it also built the MLNG staff housing; in Miri, it
permission first. We had become known for operating on trust and
built the Shell head office.
doing the best for our clients, including saving costs for them.
At times, Jurutama was the principal subcontractor and at
Lim Choong Kong, managing director of Jurutama Sdn Bhd
other times, the joint venture partner of Mitsui Construction
Co. of Japan, with whom it forged a strong relationship. Mitsui
introduced Jurutama to the manufacture of pre-stressed spun
concrete piles, a new piling system that was beginning to
revolutionise the construction industry. The Mitsui connection
was instrumental in Jurutama diversifying into manufacturing
with the establishment of Industrial Concrete Products Sdn Bhd
(ICP) in 1977 one of Jurutamas biggest assets.
IGB Construction Sdn Bhd began as the in-house construction
division of the parent company. Its successful completion of
the 20-storey Plaza Pekeliling in Kuala Lumpur resulted in its
incorporation as a limited liability company in 1981. The start-up
company highlighted to IGB the need for a strategic partnership
with companies with a longer and richer history.
PROJECT PORTFOLIO
JURUTAMA
MUDAJAYA
IGB
24
25
1980s
Regardless, the M&A proceeded as planned, with common sense and pragmatism as
its hallmark.
In 1984, the second and final phase was completed with an internal restructuring that led
to the reactivation of a dormant IGB company called Solidstate Sdn Bhd. IGB transferred all
its equity interests in Mudajaya and Jurutama and IGB Construction in exchange for 31 million
shares in Solidstate, which became its wholly owned subsidiary. To celebrate their union, the
company adopted a new name the initials of their names in alphabetical order to create IJM
Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd.
Meanwhile, senior management and Maraputra Sdn Bhd, a 100% bumiputera construction
company that was previously the partner of Mudajaya, were invited to join as shareholders
of the newly-incorporated company, with the latter taking up
five million shares while the senior management team of the
combined entity was allocated 10 million shares. IJM began with
an authorised capital of RM200.0 million, and a paid up capital of
RM46.0 million.
Before the merger, all partners
Overnight, IJM became a strong, robust and competitive
of the three companies met
company with the largest pool of experienced construction
for a brainstorming workshop
engineers and managers in the country. This was just the
in Ipoh with one primary item
on the agenda: the naming of the new company, recalls Goh Chye
beginning, as it had set its sight on becoming the best managed
Keat, a partner of Jurutama who became the second group managing
and most reputable construction group in the country.
director of IJM.
All shareholders of the component companies were appointed
After much deliberation, it was decided to name the company
to the Board of Directors to enable IJM to realise the mission and
using the initials of each. We toyed with JIM, but it was shot down.
goal of the merger. IJMs first Board of Directors were:
Finally, we settled for IJM it was the alphabetical order of our company
IGB: Yap Lim Sen, Tan Boon Seng with Goh Nan Kioh and
initials and therefore did not ruffle feathers. We also liked it because it
Krishnan Tan as alternates
sounded like IBM, a much admired company.
At that point in time, we also decided on the slogan: Big, Strong
Jurutama: Lim Choong Kong and Goh Chye Keat, with Ong
and Caring, inspired by the Standard Chartered tagline Big, Strong
Yeng Tian and Lim Yong Keat as alternates
and Friendly. We agreed it was critical for senior management to be
Mudajaya: Koh Boon Chor and Koon Yew Yin, with Chay
caring, especially since the merger would result in the convergence
Kwok Thong as an alternate.
and consolidation of different work styles and corporate cultures.
Maraputra: Ahmad Azizuddin bin Haji Zainal Abidin
Independent Director: Mohd Tahir bin Haji Abdul Rahim
Mudajayas Koh Boon Chor was appointed as the first managing
director of IJM, with Jurutamas Lim Choong Kong as his deputy. Ahmad Azizuddin bin Hj
Zainal Abidin from Maraputra Sdn Bhd was appointed as IJMs first chairman.
hats in a Name?
IJM Engineering & Construction began to prepare for its first corporate milestone: public
listing on the KL Stock Exchange, now known as Bursa Malaysia. At the end of 1984, it applied
to the Foreign Investment Committee and Capital Issues Committee for public flotation. It
obtained approval from the former but the application to the Capital Issues Committee was
delayed. In IJMs 1985 Annual Report, the chairmans statement reported: The application
26
27
1980s
venture that had burnt the fingers of more seasoned players. Yet, the majority ruled in favour,
and IJM became a planter in the remote state of Sabah that was off the radar of investors
from Peninsular Malaysia. Looking back, it was a fortuitous decision that paid off, especially
whenever the construction business hit the down cycle.
The first two years tested the companys strength. It bore the challenges well, and
IJM delivered a post tax profit of RM7.2
million in 1984 and RM6.0 million
in 1985. It also invested in an office
building, the Sharidal Complex in
Petaling Jaya that became Wisma IJM,
Manufacturing company Industrial Concrete Products Sdn Bhd was the pride of Jurutama. It had
the group head office.
a winning product pre-tensioned spun concrete piles (ICP) that was introduced to Malaysia as
Then came the much-awaited news
a result of its joint venture with Mitsui Construction Co of Japan during the piling project for the
Prai Power Station Phase 3. The Japanese set up an onsite manufacturing operation, and upon
the approval for public flotation by the
the completion of the project, sold the facility at a good discount to Jurutama. In 1977, Jurutama
Capital Issues Committee of the KL Stock
incorporated ICP to manufacture and supply pre-stressed concrete piles. The product rapidly
Exchange. The offer for sale of 7,499,000
gained market acceptance, both locally and overseas, and ICP expanded its manufacturing
ordinary shares and for the subscription
operations to meet demand.
of 4,000,000 ordinary shares, both at
Jurutamas main point of contention during the pre-merger valuation exercise was the valuation
par of RM1.00 each was oversubscribed
of ICP, in which Jurutama had a 20% stake (the rest was held privately by its shareholders). ICP was
by 1.98 times. In line with the New
raking in strong profits, yet the valuation team from IGB priced it at book value and gave it a poor
forecast. The shareholders were upset.
Economic Policy, 30% of shares were
Eventually, they accepted an improved though not wholly satisfactory valuation. This
allocated for bumiputera individuals and
reconciliatory act is a proud testament of the commitment of Jurutama shareholders Lim Choong
organisations. On 29 September 1986,
Kong, Goh Chye Keat, Ong Yeng Tian and Lim Yong Keat to the merger and the future of IJM.
IJM Engineering & Construction Berhad
On 9 December 1996, ICP was listed on the Main Board of the KL Stock Exchange, and in 2004,
was listed on the KL Stock Exchange
IJM took control of the company. Later in December 2008, it was taken private because of its
with an authorised capital of RM200
subdued share price and the lack of liquidity for the stock despite good earnings.
million and a paid up capital of RM50.0
million. The share closed at RM1.10 per
share on that day.
The roll-out of the Fifth Malaysia Plan (1986-1990) had started and there was optimism.
But as a company born during an economic downturn IJM remained cautious. By sheer dint
of hard work, financial prudence and a healthy respect for risk management, it managed to
keep its head above water. These formative years shaped the character of IJM, which has been
a profitable company since Day 1, in spite of all the slings and arrows of outrageous economic
downturns and meltdowns.
ll the key players from the three companies that merged to become
IJM Engineering and Construction in 1983 were appointed to the first board
of directors. The board also represented the largest collection of Technical
College graduates ever assembled for a business venture. By chance, it
consisted of men in their 40s and 50s, which facilitated the smooth transition
of leadership from within the ranks of the founding fathers for more than 20
years. This helped mould an IJM that till this day reflects their values.
Parent company IGB left the management of IJM to the other partners, civil engineers
with substantial experience; its stewardship occurred from behind the scenes. With their
hands-on approach, the directors from Mudajaya and Jurutama led project teams to build
IJM into a construction powerhouse in Malaysia and overseas. Inventive and imaginative,
they also explored new horizons that took them far and wide to ensure the sustainability
of the company.
Thirty years on, IJM pays homage to the directors of the first board who laid the foundation
of a company that has grown from a RM46 million firm in 1983 to become the premier
diversified group in Malaysia, with a market capitalisation of RM7.78 billion at the end of 2012.
Mudajaya pioneers, Koon Yew Yin (far left) and Koh Boon Chor (far right)
with Ahmad Azizuddin (seated left), the first chairman of IJM. Standing
to the right is Yap Lim Sen, who initiated the merger that resulted in the
formation of IJM.
Left to right: Goh Chye Keat and Lim Choong Kong, Jurutama shareholders who became the co-founders of IJM.
29
1980s
Yap Lim Sen made IJM happen. This is the unanimous view held by the rest of IJMs founders.
The visionary Yap was the managing director of IGB, a property development company that
was going places. It needed a strong construction arm and instead of reinventing the wheel,
he proposed a merger between IGBs construction subsidiary and two companies led by men
who were his college mates. The result is a company built on familiarity, trust and ambition.
The formation of IJM involved the meeting of men with a similar background and similar
aspirations. We wanted to break new ground and build a reputable construction company run
by professional engineers. We invited Azizuddin, a mining engineer, to join us as chairman
because the government wanted Malays to do business.
IJM, which began as a wholly owned subsidiary of IGB, is now bigger than the parent
company. It shows the dynamism of our model. IJM today is a corporate democracy, too large
to be owned by individuals. It is a truly public company run by professionals, with no owner
operator. It is an ideal model the Malaysian government wants to
promote, and also an international model where large companies
IJM today is a corporate democracy, too
are run by professionals, with no single substantial shareholder.
large to be owned by individuals. It is a
IJM expanded overseas, but it made the best money here
truly public company run by professionals,
in Malaysia. As with any business, there are challenges but we
with no owner operator.
coped with the government policies here, and came out well. This
country is good to non Malays.
As I see it now, if given a second chance, I will do exactly the same all over again. I have a
sentimental attachment to IJM, but do not believe in clinging to it. I hope IJM will last long.
Yap retired from the board of IJM in 1989, and now divides his time between his hometown
of Ipoh and Sydney. He has diverse interests that range from investment and publishing to
food and art.
Employed as the treasurer of IGB, Goh Nan Kioh was 31 years old when he was appointed
as the alternate director of the IJM board. A business graduate, he joined IGB after having
worked in the banking sector, and led the IGB pre-merger valuation team in what he calls a
merger of talents.
IGB was happy with the valuation, and it acquired Jurutama and Mudajaya via a share
swap that cost less than RM30 million (refer to chapter 2). However, there was unhappiness
when IJM shares grew faster than that of IGB. But having entered the marriage, the partners
of Jurutama and Mudajaya were determined to live together. They were a passionate lot,
who took pride and joy in the ownership and management of IJM. They were men with great
capabilities who wanted IJM to succeed; money was not their primary motivation. They
would be a hard act to follow these days.
IGB wanted IJM to become one of the biggest construction companies in Malaysia, one that
could ride on the countrys construction and infrastructure boom. IJM met our expectations,
31
1980s
32
except that I felt that it had deviated from its original goal as a construction company. Soon
after the merger, it diversified into property development, manufacturing and plantations.
There was a difference of opinion, but the managements decision prevailed. On hindsight, it
has proven to be the right thing to do.
The success of IJM has served as an example for other engineers to strike out to establish
their own construction firms, for example, Gamuda, was once a subsidiary of Mudajaya.
Goh Nan Kioh left the IJM board in 1990, and is now a businessman with substantial equity
interest in Mega First Corporation Berhad. He also has business interests in Indo-China.
Tan Boon Seng, the son of IGB Berhad founder and owner Tan Chin Nam, was the general
manager of IGB since 1980. He was appointed to the IJM board as the representative of the
single largest shareholder of IJM. Tan served as a board member from 1984 to 1989, and was
instrumental in the purchase of Sharidal Complex in Petaling Jaya to accommodate the newly
incorporated IJM. The building was renamed Wisma IJM, and serves the head office of IJM till
this day.
A Master of Arts graduate from Cambridge University, United Kingdom, Tan Boon Seng
served as the managing director of IGB from 1991, and has been its joint managing director since
1995. He has extensive experience in property development, corporate finance and trading, and
currently serves as the chairman and managing director of Lee Hing Development Limited
based in Hong Kong. He is also a director of Wo Kee Hong (Holdings) Limited and Genting Hong
Kong Limited. All three companies are plcs listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
Krishnan Tan was a 31-year old accountant hired by Yap Lim Sen for IGB. Tan chose to move
to the newly established construction group, where he became the first financial controller of
IJM, with the blessings of Yap who gave him the sage advice: Let the engineers do what they
know best, while you look after the money. Tan says, The merger created the largest pool
of construction professionals under one roof in Malaysia. IJM was a consortium with huge
technical capabilities, an excellent track record and at the same time it met the bumiputera
equity requirement to bid for government projects.
Trust was the underlying principle at work among the founders. They shared a common
background, and there was a lot of give and take. Even though a wholly owned subsidiary
of IGB, Yap left IJM to be run independently by the engineers, which gave the new company
room to grow and grow. This has been the key to our success.
Tan rose to become IJMs third group managing director, the first non engineer to hold the
position. The last of the founding board in IJM employment, he relinquished the reins of the
group in 2010, and now serves as the executive deputy chairman. He has several directorships
within and outside the IJM Group, including one at Malaysia Airlines (more on Krishnan Tan
as group managing director in Chapter 10).
34
35
1980s
tend to stick together and rarely quarrel like those in other companies, where there are
quarrels even with subcontractors.
Lim Choong Kong retired from IJM in 1988, the same year as Koh Boon Chor and Koon
Yew Yin. However, the Mudajaya pair continued to serve as IJM directors while Lim chose to
pursue other business interests.
Krishnan Tan describes his predecessor Goh Chye Keat, who became the second group
managing director of IJM, as a prominent player from Day 1. A Technical College graduate and
PWD civil engineer who became a senior partner of Jurutama at the behest of Lim Choong
Kong, Goh joined the first board of directors at the age of 43. Under his watch from 19881996, IJM struggled out of hard times to soar with the Malaysias infrastructure & construction
boom of the early 1990s. A strategic thinker who stressed on team play, Goh is recognised for
ramping up IJMs five core businesses construction, property development, manufacturing
& quarrying, plantation and infrastructure.
He says, The merger was initiated by Yap Lim Sen, who read the cards right. He recognised
that the country needed bigger construction companies, and advised us to merge into a bigger
entity to compete with Japanese and Korean construction giants who were here because of
the Look East Policy.
When IGB acquired the three companies it paid us with
We embarked on a business and geographical
the issuance of its shares. The valuation of the companies was
diversification strategy that resulted in downward
based on net assets and three years of guaranteed profits by the
integration into building materials, vertical
principals. As a result, after the merger, we continued to work
integration into property development and
independently on projects already in hand for the first three
geographical expansion into overseas markets.
years. We just had to make sure we delivered the agreed profits.
New projects were scarce then since Malaysia was in the
throes of an economic recession. As a professional construction company, IJM had higher
overheads than traditional contractors who were mainly family-owned businesses with
lower overheads. Our primary concern was whether we could be competitive enough to
secure sufficient contracts to pay for overheads without slipping into the red.
Our survival was at stake, and we embarked on a business and geographical diversification
strategy that resulted in downward integration into building materials, vertical integration
into property development and geographical expansion into overseas markets. We were one
of few Malaysian companies that pre-qualified for World Bank and Asian Development Bank
projects abroad. We also took the unprecedented step of moving into the plantation business,
which incidentally has construction potential building roads, housing and utilities.
Under Koh Boon Chors leadership, IJM was in the consolidation mode, trying to get
people to work together and manage our resources in tough times. When I took over as group
managing director, there was organic growth as well as business building. Krishnan Tan
continued with the organic growth and bulked up the company with mergers & acquisitions
during his term of office.
36
37
1980s
Goh retired as IJM group managing director in 1996 and in his inimitable management
style prepared a comprehensive set of hand-over notes for Krishnan Tan to ensure a smooth
transition of leadership. Like the rest, he is in active retirement pursuing a range of business
interests. (More on Goh Chye Keat as group managing director in Chapter 7)
Ong Yeng Tian was one of the resident engineers of the Muda Irrigation project when he
met Lim Choong Kong. A student of Penangs Chung Ling High School, he graduated as a civil
engineer from RMIT, Australia. This was followed by a stint with the Drainage & Irrigation
Department before he was invited by Lim Choong Kong to become
a founder partner of Jurutama.
He says, One of the main benefits of the merger was growth
at a rapid rate that would have been impossible had Jurutama not
merged with the other two companies and become listed. With an
enlarged capital, we could diversify into other businesses, which
in a way is a risk-spreading strategy. There were some sacrifices
to be made to become a part of a larger entity, but not significant
enough compared to the benefits.
IJM dispelled the myth that local contractors were
unprofessional and technically unsound. The company slowly but
surely and muscled its way to gain the trust of local authorities
and was awarded very challenging projects. On the other hand, it
did not seize opportunities to enter China when it first opened its
doors to foreign investors and participate in construction and development projects.
Ong is a quiet achiever, recognised as the board director instrumental for IJMs foray into
plantations in Sabah. Less known is his role in property development. He says, I was keen for
IJM to enter oil palm plantations and property development, and had a difficult time trying to
convince sceptics amongst my colleagues and major shareholders since we were contractors
with no experience in both these fields. Fortunately, I had the support of some other directors
who believed we should not be putting all our eggs in one basket. We felt that the way forward
for IJM was to grow and diversify into other sectors or else we will be trouble in times of
recession when construction projects are scarce. We sought out businesses that would
cushion the impact of downturns in the construction business that is cyclical by nature, and
closely tied to the troughs and peaks of the countrys economy.
He says, I never doubted that we would be successful in both. The plantation business
is not rocket science. And I have not met successful developers who are super geniuses. I
believed that with good management and control, hard work, honesty and common sense,
we would prevail, and I was right. I thank other colleagues who believed in me and stood
by me at board level. I felt vindicated when the plantation division helped IJM weather the
storms of a few recessions. Of course, it was very satisfying to see both IJM Plantations and
IJM Land listed.
Of IJM today, he says, IJM has grown tremendously since the early days. It has evolved into
a different animal with a different corporate culture. Although it retains the professionalism
and aspiration to do a good job, the interpersonal relationship among staff is different. In
my time, the relationship among staff was almost family-like. Now, the atmosphere I observe
is almost impersonal. I suppose this tends to happen with a company that has grown to
such a huge size so rapidly. In my time, most staff joined at entry level and there was time to
assimilate the company culture. It is not so now.
Ong retired from IJM in 1990, and currently provides oversight for a few companies,
mainly in his favourite sectors, plantations and property development. He has ongoing
property development projects in Ipoh, Bukit Mertajam and is planning another in Australia.
He describes them all as small scale ventures.
Lim Yong Keat is credited with turning Industrial Concrete Products Sdn Bhd (ICP) from
a company with a seed capital of RM30,000 in 1977 into the largest pre-tensioned spun
concrete piles manufacturer in Southeast Asia. In 1981, there was a further cash injection
that raised the paid-up capital to RM550,000. In 1994, ICPs value grew to RM72 million
following the asset injection of Hume factories, valued at RM48 million. In 2004, IJM bought
Humes 33% stake in ICP, and injected its quarry and ready mixed concrete assets, valued at
RM130 million. Apart from the initial cash capital of RM550,000 and two injections of assets
totalling RM178 million, there were no other capital call up. Today, ICPs shareholders fund
stands at RM700 million.
The building materials manufacturer has also evolved from a single product company to a
group of companies involved in multiple product manufacture, marketing and investments ICP that now has an international presence.
Lim Yong Keat was a Technical College graduate who became a PWD civil engineer.
Meticulous and detailed, he brought to IJM several invaluable qualities, given his predisposition
for engineering design and technical sales & marketing experience. His contributions to IJM
at its inception were in the areas of administrative and personnel
systems and computerisation. He resigned as a director of IJM in
With the merger, ICP had an in-house buyer. But
1994 to concentrate on building up ICP.
we never stopped looking for new markets and
Lims previous experience came in handy. He recalls,
today our pre-tensioned spun concrete pipes is a
Before joining Jurutama as a partner, I worked as a marketing
market leader in Malaysia and also earning export
engineer at the Australian-owned United Asbestos Cement
ringgit for the company.
Bhd (UAC) for a year and a half, at a time when few engineers
wanted to do marketing. I liked it, and worked in the pipes
division selling pipes to the JKR, state government water authorities and these contacts
were useful when I joined Jurutama, later a part of IJM. The UAC experience gave me the
skills sets to grow ICP into a profitable business for the IJM Group. The importance of
credit control in marketing cannot be overemphasised, and it became central to the ICP
business management process.
38
With the formation of IJM, ICP had an in-house buyer. But we never stopped looking for
new markets and today our pre-tensioned spun concrete piles is a market leader in Malaysia
and also earning export ringgit for the company.
On the merger with IGB, Lim had this to say: The statement put to us by Yap Lim Sen in
1982 was that most of big corporations were helmed by accountants and lawyers. Why cant
engineers be given similar opportunities? The idea was to gather capable engineers to build
and run bigger companies. Much has been said about low valuations given to Jurutama and
ICP. Thanks to this low valuation, 80% of ICP shares remained in the hands of the founders
at the time of the merger. For the acquisition of Jurutama and Mudajaya, IGB issued about
15 million shares at RM2 each, equivalent to about 10% of its paid up capital then. From the
proforma Consolidated Profit and Loss Account at December 1983, Mudajaya and Jurutama
contributed about 40% of the group profit of IGB. Unfortunately, for the principals, just
months after getting their IGB shares, the price went down to RM1.
After the merger, we had great expectations of learning from a bigger company. As Yap left
us alone to manage the new entity, we had to put together a management system by adapting
the best practices from both Jurutama and Mudajaya, says Lim.
It was Yaps hands-off policy that enabled IJM to grow and diversify its business. But a
time came when IJM was perceived to be going out of control. One day in the early 1990s, Yap
called a crucial meeting with all the principals and put this question to them: Are you ready
to be on your own? To maintain our independence, we had no choice but put up a brave front
and said yes. His parting remark was: We will act accordingly. Shortly after this, IGB started
diluting its equity interest in IJM, from 51% to 20%. Yap was definitely visionary and ahead of
his time.
Lim says the pioneers of IJM belong to the generation that participated in open tender
government projects. He explains, They treated the Government General Order and
Financial Order as bibles when bidding for jobs, and we were diligent in meeting all the
criteria stipulated in tender documents. We were also trained to deliver according to the
terms and conditions of the contract as there were government audits being conducted
throughout the project. The pioneers, the last of whom is Krishnan Tan, were raised on this
tradition of governance.
Lim Yong Keat was the executive director and shareholder of ICP, which became a public
listed company in 1996. It was taken private in 2008, and became a wholly owned subsidiary
of IJM. After his retirement in 2004, Lim was appointed as an advisor of the ICP Group and
continues in this role till today.
39
1980s
40
Koh Boon Chor describes his Mudajaya partner Koon as an enterprising businessman who
charged ahead with the boleh approach to get jobs, sometimes with low tenders. This is the
quintessential Koon, with the DNA of an entrepreneur and an appetite for calculated risks.
Koon was 50 years old when he became a member of the first IJM board of directors.
Says Koon, Most of us were poor boys from the Technical College, with nothing much to
lose. We stuck together, and the need to succeed became our mother of invention, and it led
to the formation of IJM.
Yap Lim Sen is the prime mover of the merger and the listing
Each of our companies had its own track
of IJM. Each of our companies had its own track record, and this
record, and this was important for listing,
was important for listing, which took account of the financial
which took account of the financial health,
health, operational capabilities and prospects of the company.
When we joined IJM, Mudajaya was a cash rich company and
operational capabilities and prospects of
had RM17 million in reserves. We were acquired with the issuance
the company.
41
1980s
of eight million IGB shares at RM2 each. We were not happy, but the survival of the fledgling
company was what mattered most.
There was a recession when IJM started, so we kept our overheads low and managed
to stay afloat because we owned it, led it and were the main performers. We also hired
unemployed graduates, giving them jobs when they had little hope elsewhere. Some remained
with us when good times came.
Looking back, IJM has always managed to survive one economic crisis after another. Our
chairman Azizuddin was a politician, but we did not win jobs because of his connections.
We got them on merit and took chances when no one else did. The company diversified and
entered the plantation business in Sabah. It was a state scheme that offered us good terms
and it has worked out well for IJM.
Koon did not take up any management position after a heart bypass operation but
remained as a board director until 1994. Widely respected in the investment community
for his good picks on Bursa Malaysia, he is also a philanthropist known for giving
scholarships to poor students. His charitable work won him recognition in the 2011 Forbes
Asia Philanthropy Issue.
44
Lessons in Leadership-1
Koh Boon Chor
Managing Director, 1984-1988
A technocrat, Koh was adept at laying the foundation of a professionally run organisation,
with emphasis on computerisation, process and systems excellence, which was second
nature to the professional engineers who led the management team. Equal emphasis was
given to good governance, which was fundamental to the realisation of IJMs desire to become
a public listed company while gaining recognition as a world-class professional engineering
construction firm.
To forge a sense of belonging and cohesion among staff, the integration exercise kicked
off with the transfer of 200 staff about 100 from Mudajaya, 80 from Jurutama and 20 from
IGB Berhad to the newborn IJM Group. A common salary scheme was unveiled for all staff,
and payroll, accounting and tender processes rationalised into a standard operating system
that was undeniably IJM. This was implemented despite a condition of the merger that
provided for the valuation of the three companies to be based on their individual net assets
and three years of guaranteed profits by the principals. It allowed Jurutama, Mudajaya and
45
1980s
IGB Construction to work independently on projects in hand for the first three years as long
as they delivered the guaranteed profits.
However, they could not bid individually for government jobs since the Jabatan Kerja
Raya (previously PWD) required them to surrender their individual licences. Instead, the JKR
issued a Class A Construction Licence to IJM on the back of the track record of its constituent
companies. This ruling did not apply to private sector projects. As a result, Jurutama and
Mudajaya who had built long term relationships with technology partners and private clients,
invoked their individual licences to make inroads into private projects.
The biggest challenge came from people management. To merge three companies and get
their staff to work harmoniously was tough, acknowledges Koh Boon Chor. Each company
had its own history and philosophy, and as managing director I wanted to bring out the best
in staff for the best of IJM. It is like building a bridge. To build a strong and sturdy one, the
project head not only has to make both sides meet but also has to
ensure the bridge can withstand the test of time. Otherwise the
bridge wont last. To achieve this, I knew I had to be firm and fair at
all times.
First on my agenda was to address staff all at once, which I did it
Construction management is most exacting in that it requires
together with the rest of my management team because through them
thorough planning, close coordination and communication, and
all three merging companies were well-represented. This I felt was
absolute control of manpower, material and financial resources. It is
the right approach because if we met them as individual groups, the
precisely in these respects that the IJM Group excels.
Computerisation of all the companys activities ensures better
perception of favouritism and discrimination is more likely to arise.
planning and control and at the same time significantly benefits
We faced staff without fear or favour to provide reassurances,
productivity. In addition to its versatile and dedicated team of
dispel disquiet and instill loyalty to the new company. Sometimes
professionals, the group has some $30 million worth of plant and
it was like walking on eggshells, and delicate situations had to be
equipment resources, which enables the group to be self-sufficient.
handled with care and compromise. I would seek the advice of
Source: IJM Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd Corporate Profile 1985
Jurutama directors whenever necessary to resolve grievances of
staff previously under their employ. However, while conciliatory, we
did not wish to be intimidated, and I made it clear that no one was
indispensable.
At these forums, I explained to staff that the merger would
enable IJM to bid for bigger projects and they stood to benefit from
a more profitable company. I also assured them that their jobs were
safe as the management was committed to retaining all staff. There
would be no shedding of staff even though the business environment
was gloomy.
The economy had slowed as the country grappled with its
first ever recession in 1985, which was caused by the sharp fall
in commodity prices, the main revenue generator for Malaysia
then. A large number of local contractors were without adequate
work volume and the continued presence of foreign contractors
compounded the problems in the industry, making competitive
he Groups Resources
46
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-1
47
1980s
A leader is good when he
gets things done; better when people
know he exists; best when people
exclaim: we did it ourselves!
Lao Tze, Chinese sage
bidding extremely difficult. Public capital expenditure for infrastructure and construction,
the lifeline of our business, shrank and unemployment hit an all time high of 8%. Against
this harsh backdrop, IJM managed to secure a few new projects, but the main contributors to
revenue were older contracts belonging to Mudajaya and Jurutama that were still a work-inprogress. There was also the pressure to remain profitable as IJM needed to stay on course to
meet its deadline for public flotation in 1985.
Money was scarce but I am proud to say IJM did not retrench staff. Our overheads were
high because in our desire to become a professional construction company, we employed only
professional engineers. IJM had the largest pool of construction
professionals on its payroll given its multi-disciplinary approach
to construction to ensure physical and financial success. However,
it also meant that we were management intensive unlike other
construction companies that were family businesses. This affected
our competitiveness, but we refused to take the easy route of
reducing staff numbers. As a new company, retrenchment may
appear to be the obvious solution. IJM, however, did not want to be
tainted by the stigma of a heartless company that does not care for
its staff. From the outset, we made it clear that staff welfare counts.
Instead, we tightened our belt and cost cutting became our
mantra. Several members of the senior management were men
of Hokkien or Hakka origin, known for their frugal ways, and this
may have had some bearing on the companys prudent practices.
Fortunately, we had the systems in place to closely monitor our
cash flow, balance sheet and income and expenditure, and they
helped us to take the necessary pre-emptive measures to avoid
slipping into the red.
Management did not pay itself excessively; instead IJM
continued to allocate reserve funds to invest for growth. It was
a matter of sound corporate practice for good governance and
sustainability, which was close to the heart of the founders. As
group managing director, my monthly salary was RM12,000 while
that of my deputy was RM11,000, considered modest by industry
standards. I had no increase in salary for the duration of my five year term in office. We did
not have any entertainment allowance, which is common for the top management in the
construction business, and travel was restricted to economy class flights, and even then, only
when deemed essential.
Things came to a head in 1986, when the management had no choice but to resort to a
voluntary pay cut to contain costs. This was implemented across the board, barring the lower
income group that was spared. Everyone felt it was a better alternative to retrenchment. Then
we did the unexpected. When the companys financial position improved, IJM returned every
sen sacrificed by staff. I think staff were taken aback because it is not the norm in business.
I think the action boosted the companys image and engendered staff loyalty. This preemptive action and reaction has become a part of IJMs unique way of dealing with threats to
its profitability. When pay cuts were introduced in the aftermath of the 1997 Asian Financial
Crisis and 2008 global economic meltdown, I was told staff took it in their stride. They knew
that IJM would pay back the money when the economy improved.
There was underemployment but company time was put to good use with staff
development programmes. We conducted in-house training for human relations skills,
computer applications and financial & engineering practices. We also launched a scholarship
scheme to sponsor bumiputera students to local universities to increase bumiputera
participation in the construction industry.
Our engineers were encouraged to pursue the Advanced Management Development
Program conducted by the Golden Gate
University of the USA that was sponsored
by the company. The management
rationalised that this approach would
strengthen our in-house capabilities to bid
First office: at parent company IGB Berhads
for big jobs when the economy bounced
premises in Jalan Pekeliling, Kuala Lumpur
back. We wanted to be in a state of readiness
before moving to current head office building
when good times came instead of putting a
in Wisma IJM
team together only after winning contracts.
First motto: Big, Strong and Caring
By 1986, we had 12 staff with the Master in
First chairman: Ahmad Azizuddin bin Haji
Business Administration from the Golden
Zainal Abidin
Gate University.
First managing director: Koh Boon Chor
Notwithstanding
our
own
financial hardship, IJM also responded
First deputy managing director: Lim Choong
Kong
to the governments call to hire the
unemployed. In 1987, we launched
First engineer: Goh Chye Koon, a senior PWD
the Unemployed Graduates Training
civil engineer who was hired in 1984 and rose
to become the groups deputy managing
Programme, which saw 11 new civil
director. Prior to him, engineers in the company
engineering graduates completing a one
were either from IGB, Mudajaya or Jurutama.
year internship that involved six months
First corporate acquisition: Pucung Building
of field work, three months in the tender
Products Sdn Bhd (49%) in 1984 for quarry
department and three months in the
operations
accounts department. Upon completion
First wholly owned subsidiary (excluding
of their internship, seven were offered
three merging companies): Chen Yu Land
permanent employment by IJM.
ist of Firsts
48
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-1
49
1980s
role as group managing director, Koh Boon Chor was in charge of a few Malaysia-based
construction projects and one in Sydney, Australia - the construction of the head office of the
St Georges Building Society.
He says: Project engineers were the pulse and profit centre of IJM. They could make
or break the company. Working from site offices, hundreds, even thousands, of miles away,
they are essentially running satellite operations. So, it was vital to accord them their due
recognition while aligning them to the head office work practices and ethics.
We thus introduced a project incentive scheme that involved drawing up a budget for each
project, irrespective of the tender price. When the project team
delivers savings on this, 20% of it is ploughed back to the team,
not the head office. At times, we had project heads earning more
than the senior management. At the head office, staff received
bonuses based on work performance. I believe these incentives
resulted in a low staff turnover.
To keep abreast with what was happening on the ground,
I felt the American-style management where the CEO goes on
walkabouts was more appropriate than the hierarchical British
management style with its more rigid reporting structure. Every
now and then, I would travel to site offices to meet the No. 1, 2 and
3 of project teams and engage them in small talk while obtaining
updates on the work in progress. I made a conscientious effort
not to undermine anyone, especially senior personnel, when
fraternising with their project staff.
On my visits, I never failed to tire of reminding project teams of the golden rule of IJM:
A promise is a promise. If you cannot fulfil it, you must explain it to the client. These men
were the face of IJM and it was important that they represent the values of the company.
Face-to-face engagements helped create a congenial and caring working environment.
During these sessions, I learned about their problems and sought ways to resolve them. Some
of these men were away from home for long periods of time, and their children were raised
entirely by their wives. I discovered their strengths and sought ways to harness them for the
benefit of the company. My best moments at IJM were those spent with site staff. We had a
good team, who were open to discussion to tackle problems and solve them.
In 1988, Koh Boon Chor retired as the group managing director at the age of 55. Businesswise,
his years in office were characterised by the constant struggle for survival because of low
profit margins and high overheads, especially the cost of hiring professionals in a difficult
economic environment. However, he had laid the foundation for a public listed professional
construction company that was the first of its kind in Malaysia. In terms of capabilities, the
group had grown from its initial staff strength of 200 to more than 500 trained personnel.
He acknowledges their invaluable contribution to the groups success and profitability
throughout the difficult years. In recognition of their loyalty and dedication, IJM issued a
significant portion of its equity upon public listing in 1986 to staff to allow them an active
participation in its growth.
Koh set the precedent for the leadership succession plan that was deliberated and adopted
by the board of directors in the early days of the formation of the IJM Group.
The board had set 55 as the age of retirement using the government benchmark. After
stepping down, Koh remained as a non executive board director with two functions. First,
was to serve as a sitting board member who had recent knowledge of the groups activities to
help chart strategic directions for the group while ensuring a smooth transition of power and
responsibilities to the new leadership. Second, was to continue his role as a project director
to ensure continuity as well as enhance client goodwill for his portfolio of projects.
This leadership succession plan continues to serve IJM till this day. The leadership team
of Koh Boon Chor and his deputy Lim Choong Kong ended in 1988, when both retired. They
were succeeded by Goh Chye Keat as the group managing director, with Chay Kwok Thong as
the deputy.
Koh provided oversight for Australia-based projects such as the St Georges Building Society head office in Kogarah, Sydney.
50
The 5th Malaysia Plan of 1986-90 sadly did not bring much cheer. In the I986
Annual Report, IJM chairman Ahmad Azizuddin bin Haji Zainal Abidin writes:
There are some signs that the countrys economic outlook is improving. Continued recovery,
however, will depend on sustained improvement in commodity prices. For the construction
sector, recovery is expected to be slower. Private sector expenditure on residential and
commercial buildings can be expected to remain weak and government infrastructure
investments will at best be modest. It will take some time before improvements in government
revenue from rising commodity prices are translated into increased government spending for
infrastructural development. Prospects for the group in 1987 can be expected to be satisfactory.
Satisfactory is corporate-speak for disappointing. It was a trying year indeed, with
statistics confirming that the construction sector remained depressed for the third consecutive
year, recording a 5.4% decline. Group pre-tax profit declined 38% to RM7.6 million in 1987,
only to slump further by another 54% to an all-time low of RM3.5 million in 1988 accounting
for a mere 1.93% of the group turnover of RM207 million. Profit margins were alarmingly slim,
and if the trend continued, the group was in danger of slipping into the red.
When the economy hit the skids, IJM has just taken off with a share capital of RM46 million that
grew to RM50 million following the public flotation exercise in 1986. Serious soul-searching
within the ranks of management on how best to maximise returns on shareholder funds
resulted in the adoption of a diversification strategy to ensure their dreams dont turn to dust.
Since pickings were poor in recession-ridden Malaysia, IJM decided to explore greener
pastures in the USA, UK, Australia, Singapore and developing countries. The geographical
diversification occurred on the coat-tails of directors, who pulled out all stops to activate
contacts in their respective spheres of influence. Happily, they met with some success.
51
1980s
urvival Strategies
1980s
Source: Governance Re-invented: Progress, Constraints, and Remaining Agenda in Banking and Corporate Restructuring in Malaysia by Mohamed Ariff, Azmi Setapa and Elayne
Yee Siew Lin (http://www.unescap.org/drpad/publication/fin_2148/chap3.pdf)
53
54
Quarrying in Selangor
55
1980s
ICPs factory in Kapar marked its entry from Penang to the Klang Valley in
the 1980s.
it to gain a foothold in quarrying in Selangor via Pucungs wholly owned subsidiary Kamad
Quarry Sdn Berhad.
For manufacturing, ICP expanded its pre-tensioned spun concrete piles
business by setting up factories in Penang, Perak, Selangor and Terengganu. The
building material base was widened
further when the company invested in
Source: Business Times, 19 June 1991
Styrobilt Sdn Bhd (65%) to produce and
market Styrocon and Stryroplast dry wall
panels. Patented in the United Kingdom
and manufactured under licence in
Malaysia, these panels were particularly
suited for external and internal drywall
construction in industrial, commercial,
institutional and residential buildings.
More products and services entered
the IJM stable when the company
bought stakes in Glass Reinforced
Cement Sdn Bhd (reinforced cement products) Cofreth
(M) Sdn Bhd (electro-mechanical services) and Ulbon Sdn
Bhd (high frequency induction heat treated bars for prestressed concrete).
The manufacture of building materials helped improve
the efficiency and competitiveness of the group. With the
economies of scale provided by in-house purchases, these
companies were able to compete and expand their market
presence.
56
57
1980s
included prestigious projects such as Subang International Airport, the US Embassy, Taman
Melawati, Istana Kinta and the Dayabumi Complex.
In 1985, IJM took the unusual step of diversifying into oil palm plantations in Sabah. The
decision, including the venture into Sabah, took the business community by surprise as it was
a path that had been trodden by more seasoned players, some of whom had returned hurt. It
was not without its detractors in the board, and difficult boardroom discussions ensued. They
argued that plantation agriculture veered from the groups stick to the knitting strategy of
familiarity. Their contention was that the group was clueless about agriculture. The counter
argument was that there was a need for a business that provided revenues to offset down
times in the cyclical construction business. The detractors were outnumbered and the
motion to carry was passed. Apart from reflecting the democracy of the board, the decision
also reflected the entrepreneurial DNA of the pioneers. They were engineers willing to take
calculated risks, and not to be stifled easily. An agro-economist of good standing in oil palm
agriculture was engaged to do the necessary research and math. He was KP Lim, a friend of
Lim Choong Kong, with impressive credentials in plantations economics, especially oil palm.
Better still, he was familiar with conditions in Sabah.
58
1980s
59
50:50 joint venture with KPD contributing land, and we contribute our share of RM7 million
to fund the plant-up that would occur over a period of time. This would enable us to raise
Source: New Straits Times, 15 December 1989
funds progressively, internally and through bank loans. IJM has
always appreciated the great leap of faith on the part of KPD,
which entered into a partnership with a company that had no
previous experience in plantations and probably no immediate
money to meet its obligations. As it turned out two decades later,
Desa Talisai is probably one of the most profitable investments
made by KPD.
Oil palm has a gestation period of three years after which
it provides regular income for a period of 20 years. Goh Chye
Keat describes the foray into plantations as a fantastic success
story whose growth has been beyond our wildest imagination.
The founding fathers had no experience and brought in KP Lim
as a consultant and Velayuthan Tan as the manager. Vela had
previously worked in oil palm estates and was a confident and
good operator. With good management to ensure high yields, we
started to get back our investment in five years.
Through sheer dint of work, prudence and out-of-the-box
thinking, things began to look up for the group by the late 1980s.
Staff morale and business prospects were boosted in 1988, when
IJM won a RM103.76 million contract for the construction of the
North Klang Valley Expressway (NKVE) from Klang to Subang.
This is the first package of the North-South Expressway, a massive
highway privatisation concession awarded to United Engineers
Malaysia Berhad (UEM). Although the award had its critics who
claimed IJM had underpriced the bid and would suffer huge losses
since the closest competitor had quoted a considerably higher
price, IJM and its people remained confident as it was later borne
out. IJM and its subsidiaries went on to successfully construct
the NKVE as well as many other sections of the North South
Expressway.
By the end of the recession, IJM emerged with four core
businesses that became the groups pillars of growth, profitability
North Klang Valley Expressway: on the road to recovery.
and sustainability. A name change occurred in 1989, when IJM
Engineering & Construction adopted IJM Corporation Berhad to
better reflect the changing concentration of the groups activities.
A new logo was created and it remains in use till this day.
On a Roll
passage that built the character and culture of the group. As the economy
turned the corner, it was in a state of preparedness with the right mindset,
talent and stamina to ride on the wave of a buoyant economy that occurred
under the leadership of prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad who entered
his third term in office after a decisive electoral victory in November 1990.
The election results left him virtually unchallengeable and gave him an
They became the pillars of his working paper Malaysia: The Way Forward popularised as
Vision 2020 and unveiled in 1991. Vision 2020 mapped out the national agenda to transform
Malaysia into a fully developed nation by the year 2020. It was an exhilarating start to the
new decade and included an instructive note that since no nation can achieve full progress
with only half its human resources harnessed bumiputeras must play their part in the
achievement of this national goal. Indeed, the entire population was to be mobilised to make
the 1990s the most economically productive decade in our history.
Vision 2020 urged accelerated privatisation to make a flourishing reality of Malaysia
Incorporated, the productive partnership between the public and private sectors that was
deemed vital for the realisation of national aspirations. Even as early as 1984, Dr Mahathir had
declared in a paper entitled Malaysia Incorporated and Privatisation:
The time has come for all managers in the private sector to stop thinking of progress and
development only in terms of what their own companies and firms intend to do. Malaysia
has the resources. It has the manpower. It has the basic skills. It is rich enough to buy the
technology if home-grown technology is not available. Malaysia is stable, prosperous and
strategically situated. Indeed, the list of positive assets of Malaysia is long and impressive.
But to succeed, we must have the right attitude. We must cultivate the right values and ethics.
61
1990s
62
ON A ROLL
63
1990s
The groups construction business was the golden child, filling the order book with project
after project to breach the RM1 billion mark in 1991. It was unstoppable over the next few
years, delivering sterling performances that saw the groups market capitalisation soaring
from 260.8 million in 1990 to RM1 billion in 1993 (when the share price hit a high of RM11.80)
and peaked at RM1.88 billion in 1996. According to group managing director Goh Chye Keat:
From 1991 onwards, Profit Before Tax grew substantially, from RM31 million in 1991 to RM51
million in 1993, RM81 million in 1994, RM97 million in 1995 and RM116
million in 1996. No serious challenges or hurdles were encountered
during that period.
They were heady days indeed, not just for IJM but for the rest
of the nation and countries in the region, hailed as Asian miracle
workers, Tiger Nations roaring away with double digit growth and
whose eastern management philosophies and work ethic were
lauded by western management gurus, business schools and books.
The Gulf War of 1991 failed to dampen their zeal.
For IJM, the up cycle began in 1988 when it landed the first package
for the construction of the 847.7 km North-South Highway, a privatised
build-operate-transfer project awarded to United Engineers (Malaysia)
Berhad, the private concessionaire of the dual carriage toll highway. More construction
packages followed. The group also succeeded in winning substantial packages in other
landmark projects such as the Mid Valley Megamall (initially called the Grand Bazaar), the KL
International Airport, Putrajaya and the Commonwealth Games Village to be built by the host
nation for the XVI Commonwealth Games held in Kuala Lumpur in 1998.
IJM was awarded the contract for earthworks at the main terminal and construction of the second runway at KL International Airport.
66
ON A ROLL
67
1990s
C u r i o u s l y, w h i l e a c h i e v i n g
considerable success as a contractor, IJM
did not succeed in securing any significant
privatised infrastructure project to call
its own, even though bids were made.
Still, IJM was not out on a limb. While it
failed to win privatisation projects (due
to lack of know who), typically multimillion or billion ringgit Build-OperateTransfer concessions for highways, ports
and independent power plants with
promises of recurrent income, it secured
projects from these concessionaires,
mainly start-ups with little expertise
and track record. The latter made up for
the shortfall by appointing experienced
players such as IJM as contractors and
subcontractors. This resulted in the
mobilisation of professionals, paraprofessionals, technicians and support
service providers across the board.
Privatisation truly enlarged the proverbial
economic pie, with slices of varying sizes
distributed to anyone worth his salt. The
construction of the North-South Highway
and the development of the green field
KL International Airport and federal
administrative city of Putrajaya are
classic examples.
Never in the history of Malaysia has so
much development occurred in so little
time. IJM was flush with jobs, and under
pressure to meet tight deadlines to build
fast-track world class infrastructure
as the nation rushed to have iconic
landmarks to put Malaysia on the world
The Sedenak-Kulai stretch of the
North-South Expressway is one
of many packages of the 772-km
highway built by IJM. This is the
longest expressway in Malaysia.
Steel fabrication
works for the Pergau
hydroelectric dam
in Kelantan was
undertaken by IJM
subsidiary Torsco.
map Dr Mahathirs famous phrase, which became an oft-repeated quote, to attract trade and
investments. Demand outstripped supply, and manpower and material shortages became
critical. IJM took comfort in the fact that it could leverage on its first-rate talent pool of
professionals and in-house quarrying and building materials business.
The quarrying and manufacturing division was expanded with new acquisitions to feed
construction demand. The move also represented the group strategy to broaden and enhance
the earnings base of all its revenue streams. While quarrying & manufacturing divisions direct
contribution to the bottom line was middling because of intense competition and shrinking
margins, it played a vital role in supporting the construction and property divisions.
Two companies stood out as top performers, pretensioned spun concrete pile
manufacturer Industrial Concrete Products Sdn Bhd (ICP) and steel fabricator Torsco Sdn
Bhd, both market leaders in their respective fields. In 1996, ICP was listed on the Kuala
Lumpur Stock Exchange and Torsco was next in line. The IJM Annual Report 1996 states:
The listing of ICP and the proposed listing of Torsco will enable both companies to access
cheaper funds from the capital markets to spur their respective companys expansion
plans. It will also greatly enhance the market value of the groups investments.
IJMs property business began to shine when it ventured into high end residential and
the industrial markets with Riana Green Condominium, PJ Industrial Park and Bukit Raja
Industrial Park, all in the Klang Valley, Sri Pangkor and Bukit Jambul satellite town in Penang.
Adopting the motto Excellence through Quality (later adopted group-wide in 1994 when IJM
began to pursue ISO certification for its core businesses), it began to gain market acceptance
68
ON A ROLL
1990s
69
27 August 1994
70
ON A ROLL
1990s
MASSCORP sees itself as a catalyst for Malaysian trade
promotion and investment in South countries, said Malaysia
South-South Corporation chairman, Azman Hashim. According
to him, there is tremendous potential for trade and investment
in South countries. Trade and investment among South countries
only came into focus in recent years, and Malaysias external
trade with them accounts for only 8% of its total trade. Our trade
statistics show that Malaysias external trade is skewed towards
Singapore, the US and the European Community. Together, they
account for 70.6% of external trade of RM195.8 billion, he said.
Business Times (Anna Taing, 14 June 1993)
IJM ventured into the education business that culminated in the Penang International Education and Technology Centre in Bukit Jambul. It exited from the
business in 2009.
71
1997: Signing ceremony between IJM and the City of Windhoek in Namibia
for the development of Freedom Square.
any more. On behalf of those nations, still overwhelmed by unbeatable external debts,
strait-jacketed by protectionism and beggared by volatile interest and exchange rates he
pronounced the North-South dialogue dead, and dismissed the New Economic World Order
as a non-starter. His alternative was South-South Cooperation, and offered facilities for
establishing the South-South Commission which might help to expand it. His defence against
the manipulation of the G-7 was the solidarity of the G-77. He took the initiative of practising
South-South Cooperation of a kind and embarked on a campaign of befriending and assisting
of the very small countries of the Pacific and Africa whose levels of economic development
was not as advanced as Malaysias.
Goh Chye Keat recalls, The prime minister led trade & investment missions to South
countries, accompanied by captains of industry. Most were members of the Malaysia SouthSouth Corporation Bhd (MASSCORP), the investment arm of the Malaysia South-South
Association that consisted of 48 of the biggest companies in Malaysia. IJM was one of them
because we were one of the largest construction companies in the country. The delegation
to China in 1993, for example, had representatives from half the companies listed on the
Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange, including us. Bilateral trade and investment agreements often
culminated in Malaysian companies signing Memorandums of Understanding to implement
government-to-government projects. Through MASSCORP, IJM entered Vietnam, Namibia,
Argentina, Chile, the Philippines, Myanmar, Mauritius, India and China.
They were mainly privatisation projects. In Malaysia, we had tendered for utility and
other concessions but were unsuccessful. However, the experience was invaluable, and we
put it to good use in Vietnam and secured a Built-Operate Transfer (BOT) water treatment
plant in Ho Chi Minh City that had a 25 year concession. In Philippines, we spent a lot of time
promoting BOT of a power generation facility in Manila but it was in vain. However, we met
with success in China, where IJM became a partner in the Wuxi 90 MW co-generation plant in
Jiangsu Province, our first project in the country.
ON A ROLL
72
73
1990s
Source: Business Times, 17 June 1994
ON A ROLL
75
1990s
Part of the
55-km Western
Access Tollway
in Buenos Aires,
Argentina, an IJM
infrastructure
concession asset.
78
Lessons in Leadership-2
Goh Chye Keat
Group Managing Director, 1988-1996
79
1990s
80
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-2
1990s
81
HR policies and processes aside, Goh feels a leader should also display a caring attitude to
staff and be prepared to listen and consider issues and problems faced by them. It is a good
practice to build on the strengths of an individual and help him address his or her weaknesses
by providing the necessary support. The company should also make provisions for medical
assistance and education benefits for staff and their children.
It is not all about carrots, because the stick will come down hard when there
are lapses in conduct that threaten to besmirch the reputation of IJM, especially
since its businesses involve industries riddled by dubious perks and lurks. Goh
is vehement with: As managing director, I made it clear that I will not tolerate
corruption or any other form of malpractice. The company must always practice
integrity at every level of management. Corruption in a company is like having
cancer, and it will lead to its slow or fast death. Fortunately, I had the support of
the rest of the board and management who were committed to good corporate
governance and transparency and recognised that bad practices will affect the
1996: Managing director Goh Chye Keat receiving the
survival and sustainability of the company. It must be borne in mind that is very
ISO 9002 certification on behalf of IJM from works minister
difficult to build up a good company but very easy to destroy it.
S Samy Vellu.
10
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-2
1994 Executive Committee: Seated (left to right): Krishnan Tan, Tan Sin
Leong and Goh Chye Keat. Standing (left to right): Choo Choon Yeow and
Khoo Chew Meng.
A gathering of IJM pioneers who were feted for their services to the group.
Left to right: Goh Chye Keat, Lim Yong Keat, Tan Sin Leong, Chay Kwok Thong
and Chee Wan Yee.
83
1990s
82
even months into his term of office, group managing director Krishnan
Tan had to grapple with a destabilised IJM in the wake of the brutal Asian
Financial Crisis that unleashed its fury on the region in June 1997, and whose
aftershocks continued for more than a year. He had inherited a group on its
ascendancy, with prospects shining bright. Now, this.
The speed and ferocity of the Asian Financial Crisis was nothing short of startling. What
was at the time perceived to be a localised currency and financial crisis in Thailand ravaged
the rising tiger economies of Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, Hong Kong
and Korea, and rippled across to Mexico, Brazil and Argentina. All were caught dead on
their tracks.
A paper entitled Corporate Governance and Debt in the Malaysia Financial Crisis of 1997
by Tommy Thomas, a senior consultant with the United Nations Development Programme,
quotes Linda Lim, the associate professor of International Business at the University of
Michigan Business School as reporting that after 12 robust years of uninterrupted GDP growth
averaging about 8% per annum, the Malaysian economy nose-dived into a recession with a
GDP of about minus 8% in 1998 the worst on record for independent Malaysia. According
to Lim, the ringgit depreciated almost 50% against the dollar between the first week of July
1997 (at RM2.50 = US$1.00) and January 1998 (at RM4.88 = US$1.00). The stock market collapse
was even greater. In the same six month period, the composite index experienced the biggest
plunge of all the Asian crisis countries, descending 54%, from 1,230 points to 574 points. It lost
over 65% of its capitalisation, wiping almost US$225 billion off share values. The worse was
yet to come for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE).
To contain the slide, Malaysia pondered over International Monetary Fund (IMF)
measures at the suggestion of then finance minister Anwar Ibrahim, and it included currency
devaluation and high interest rates. IMF intervention, however, came with strings attached
that prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad dismissed as untenable given the socio-economic
aspirations of the government. It led to a fall-out between the finance minister and prime
minister, who prescribed another recovery plan. On 1 September 1998, Bank Negara (Central
85
2000s
86
87
2000s
Bank) announced currency controls on foreign capital flows to curb the speculative demand
for the ringgit, and prevent its internationalisation. The following day, the ringgit was
pegged at RM3.80 to USD1. The ringgit was thus officially devalued by 34%, 10% higher in
value than if left to market forces of the time. It was an unorthodox approach denounced
by international business circles, and they retaliated. The KLSE hit rock bottom and sank to
269.42 points. Malaysia pressed on regardless. The cheaper ringgit stimulated demand for
Malaysian exports and FDI inflows while curbing the outflow of capital. In addition, a cheap
money policy took the place of the year-long rising interest rate to jump-start the domestic
economy. The government also instituted austerity measures that included substantial cuts
in public expenditure, deferment of infrastructure projects, freezing of reverse investments
and restructuring stressed financial institutions through mergers and take-overs.
A key feature of the 1997-98 crisis in Malaysia was the scale and magnitude of corporate
debt, principally borrowings by companies listed on the KLSE, and sometimes, short-term
borrowings to fund long-term projects. It exposed poor or ineffective corporate governance
that involved ill-advised investment decisions. The weakness was traced back to the
ownership structure, with little or no separation of power between owner and management.
The situation was exacerbated by the listing rule that required only a minimum of 25% of
equity to be held by the public that resulted in several plcs being controlled by an individual or
family. The Governor of Bank Negara then, Ali Abu Hassan, condemned the cavalier approach
to borrowings displayed by both directors and shareholders of several listed companies. He
said, Many, for instance, utilised their borrowings for purposes other than those declared to
the banks. Loans for working capital were used for share financing, to finance new business
ventures or became a complex web of inter-company advances. By the time the annual
review of the loans are carried out, the level of leverage in the company had ballooned and
the business focus of the group had expanded so much that it altered significantly the risk
profile of the group.
There were also instances when borrowers purposely reneged on their loans although
they had the capability and capacity to repay their loans. Whilst there had been many
initiatives to improve the credit culture in banking institutions, similar efforts should be
initiated to promote a more responsible credit behaviour among borrowers.
Several heavyweights collapsed when the screws were tightened. With little reserves set
aside for rainy days, share prices in the doldrums and the ringgit-peg burdening them with
exorbitant foreign loan repayments, they keeled over and fell.
IJM took a beating but good governance, an intrinsic value
embedded by the pioneers, kept it out of harms way.
Market capitalisation dropped by more than 60% in tandem
with the overall decline of the local bourse, from a healthy
RM1.88 billion in 1996 to a worrisome RM441 million in
1997. It dipped further to RM201 million in September 1998,
the lowest when the full impact of the crisis was felt. During the same period, share prices
plunged from RM5.95 to RM1.29 and to an all-time low of RM0.59 in September before closing
at RM2.39 at the end of 1998. Turnover shrank 22.2% from RM1.47 billion in 1997 to RM1.15
billion in 1998 and Profit Before Tax dropped from a peak of RM131 million in 1996 to RM94
million in 1997 and RM71 million in 1998. Staying profitable was indeed an achievement.
The construction, property and manufacturing & quarrying divisions took the brunt of
the fall. With the outflow of funds, liquidity shrivelled and banks
began to withdraw facilities. It had serious consequences on the
access to working capital, a situation that was worsened by the
steep rise in interest rates, leading to clients stopping work and
failing to pay. The fall of the ringgit, meanwhile, resulted in the
ballooning of foreign debt and import costs. Krishnan Tan recalls,
We were experiencing big hits from all corners on on-going
projects and businesses. On the debt side, we had funded all our
overseas investments with US dollar debt that now translated to
much bigger numbers in ringgit terms. Meanwhile, we had just
won the Putrajaya Hospital project worth RM282.7 million, more
than half of which was for plant and equipment mainly from
overseas and the costs had escalated by more than 50% for these
equipment. We faced the immediate prospect of a huge losses.
There was also a loss of confidence in Malaysian companies
among the investment community and international financial
institutions, with many withdrawing funding lines for offshore
projects. IJM was hit by the withdrawal of the funding line for its
Binh An Build-Operate-Transfer water supply project in Vietnam
where construction had reached peak intensity
IJM quickly stepped into damage-control mode, assessing the
Binh An Water Treatment Plant, IJMs build-operate-transfer concession
damage and adopted measures to address issues, particularly
in Vietnam.
those relating to contracts, debts, funding and overheads.
The collection of receivables became a priority with the abrupt stoppages of construction
work due to the lack of liquidity among clients Work schedules on some jobs were
reprogrammed to suit the clients payment capabilities. Rising costs were closely monitored
and acted upon. The glut in the property led to the deferment of new launches. For works in
progress, there was a contraction of demand, defaults by buyers and high carrying costs. The
manufacturing & quarrying division went into the red and a series of austerity measures were
put into effect to turnaround the division. The planned public flotation of IJM steel fabricating
subsidiary Torsco was aborted in 1998 because of the poor performance by companies to be
acquired by Torsco as part of the listing exercise. As to be expected, the KLSE toughened its
rules on initial public offerings as part of its post-crisis housekeeping.
One of most serious challenges faced by the group were bank debts and the liquidity
crunch caused by the outflow of funds from the country, rising interest rates and fluctuating
88
foreign exchange rates. After the ringgit peg, the volatility subsided but
businesses with foreign bank borrowings were overburdened by debt. Though
not overgeared by any standard, IJM earnestly worked at reducing bank
borrowings and restructuring the maturity profile of certain short-term debts
incurred in funding long term investment in infrastructure-based projects.
It divested its investment in Wuxi co-generation plant to the local Chinese
partner, and the proceeds were used to reduce foreign bank borrowings.
Despite the dismal scene, one knight in shining armour brought good
tidings. Plantations delivered the highest PBT contribution to the group for
two consecutive years, 1997 and 1998, as a result of higher crude palm oil prices.
The performance of the plantations division during dark times vindicated
diversification into this sector, a corporate strategy that had its detractors.
In addition, overseas operations proved their
worth. The international ventures divisions interests
in Australia (Horden Tower with OSW Properties
Pte Pty Ltd), China (equity in Guangdong Provincial
Expressway Development Co Ltd and Yangzhang
Changjiang Bridge Co Ltd) and Argentina (equity in
Grupo Concessionario del Oeste SA) had started to pay
off, with China investments posting their maiden profit
in 1996, followed by Australia in 1997 and Argentina
in 1999. Their contributions, enhanced by a weaker
ringgit, further helped the group remain in the black
in the aftermath of the 1997-98 Asian Financial Crisis.
Tan recalls the aftermath of the Asian Financial Crisis,
What saved us was our good risk management practices
in the choice of clients, conservative and prudent debt
financing policies, pragmatic quick action and, the loyalty
and commitment of proactive staff. There was also the
tinge of good luck. The biggest sacrifice was made by
89
2000s
90
ioneering in India
91
2000s
92
2000s
93
94
2000s
Rajadhok toll plaza along the 108km four lane Jaipur Mahua Tollway
95
By then, IJM had diversified into property development in India, where it created several
firsts. It was the first foreign property developer in India under the new FDI guidelines
announced in 2003. It was the first to build an integrated township in the rapidly developing
state of Andra Pradesh; and the first to develop more than 100 units of housing at any one
time in the state. IJMI property manager Manjit Singh recalls, Since 2000, IJM was ready to
enter the real estate market in India. Following the opening up of the highway sector to FDI
inflows, we felt that the real estate sector would be next. The union government formulated
and announced the first set of FDI guidelines in 2001. They were very stringent, and one in
particular blindsided us it stipulated 100 acres as the minimum acreage for development.
IJMI had by then entered into a joint venture agreement with Andra Pradesh Housing
Board to develop 35 acres in Hyderabad, 65 acres short of the 100-acre development criteria.
We decided to present our case to the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) in Delhi
to convince officials of our proposal. We were rejected twice but did not give up. Eventually,
the FIPB relaxed its guidelines provided foreign developers build no less than 2,000 housing
Commercial Crescent in
Prestige Shantiniketan, a
fully integrated township
developed in Whitefield,
Bangalore, India.
96
2000s
97
98
Overseas operations began to account for more than half the groups
construction order book by 2006. Most were Indian contracts with total values
exceeding RM1.0 billion. IJM properties were popular with Indian buyers while
the ready mixed business exceeded ICPs expectations. By 2008, the plantations
division was also in India, through a joint venture with Godrej Agrovet Limited
and Godrej Gokarna Oil Palm Limited. However, this investment was sold when
IJM Plantations decided to focus its attention in Indonesia, where it had acquired
substantial acreage of plantable land.
In less than ten years, IJMI was a mini IJM, with principal activities that
paralleled that of its parent company: construction, property, manufacturing and
oil palm processing. However, it trumped the parent with concessions, something
that had eluded the parent company on its home turf (a sore point that was sorted
out with the acquisition of Road Builder refer to Chapter 9). The earlier catch-cry
to create another IJM in India was no empty boast.
Malaysian newspapers reported that IJM planned to list its India operations.
Krishnan Tan side-stepped with: Listing will take some time, and we may when
our assets mature and our order book is replenished and increased to the levels of
our peers in India.
But, all this was not to be, at least for now. IJM was at the peak of its activity
level, both in order book and property development in early 2008, when the impact
of surging worldwide commodity prices began to be felt.
The Indian economy began to slow following the surge in commodity prices and it deteriorated
further with the 2009 global meltdown. The once aggressive economy was injured by the
backlash, as were the economies of the Middle East. With galloping material prices, projects
costs soared as did interest rates in India that rose as high as 20%, projects stalled, collections
became a nightmare and austerity measures were instituted. In an urgent message to all staff
in 2009, Tan urged the Indian team to finish off most of our projects by year end and perhaps
with the start of new projects and restructuring of working capital, better times will prevail
and a reassessment can be done in January. He reassured them with: IJM is committed to
a long term Indian strategy. Do not be disheartened, your time will certainly come and we
will be fair. However, conditions deteriorated further and IJMs Indian construction business
suffered losses. For the first time in the history of the IJM Group, the construction division
reported a loss of RM79 million in the financial year 2011, mainly due to projects in India and
the Middle East.
Meanwhile, Malaysia was becoming the land of opportunity once again with a change of
leadership. The new prime minister Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak who took office in April
2009 unveiled his Economic Transformation Plan to achieve a high income economy by 2020.
Under this plan, big ticket infrastructure projects were back on the national agenda, and IJM
had the resources to participate in this new road map for the nation.
99
2000s
100
IJMs debut in
the Gulf States:
construction of the
Emirates Catering
Centre, the largest
flight kitchen in the
world.
101
2000s
102
103
2000s
takeover of rival Road Builder Holdings Berhad (RBH), lock stock and barrel for
a whopping RM1.56 billion based on a price of RM3.00 per share. It was hailed
as the biggest and boldest merger & acquisition (M&A) in the construction
There had been media speculation of the M&A a couple of weeks prior to the official
announcement and the news grabbed many by surprise. The conservative IJM was better
known for growing its business organically or buying equity in individual companies with
promise rather than buying up whole group of companies. Intriguingly, the take-over of the
construction giant occurred without any boardroom drama, making it the stuff of corporate
dreams that IJM had the luck to live out.
The man of the hour was managing director Krishnan Tan who recalls: I could only give
very short notice to the board of directors to buy Road Builder as rumours began to fan out of
control and affected the share prices of the two companies. The directors knew that I would
have done my homework. Usually, I would talk things over, especially the numbers, with Oh
Chong Peng, the chairman of our Audit Committee, someone very well versed with corporate
matters and who would not hesitate to pour cold water on any deal with the faintest shadow
of doubt. He gave me the green light, and I proceeded to speak to the chairman and the board
about the M&A. This brought into fruition the strategy of growth by acquisition that the
group had as its strategic agenda for over three years.
Describing it as a game changer, he said the acquisition was an opportunity not to be
missed. Tan gave four reasons for the acquisition. One, word began to circulate that the
founder and largest shareholder of Road Builder, Chua Hock Chin wanted to retire and may
sell his shareholdings. It was an opportune moment for us to move as there was unlikely to
be much resistance from owner-managers for a takeover. The rest of the shareholdings were
fragmented, which made it easier to proceed with the acquisition. Moreover, many of the
significant shareholders were also shareholders of IJM, and it made the consolidation story
easier to sell.
104
2000s
Two, and more importantly, Road Builder represented a good fit for an IJM keen to
ramp up its capabilities, especially in the light of the impending 9th Malaysia Plan (20062010) rollout, where some RM200 billion had been allocated for large scale civil engineering
infrastructure. There were also opportunities arising in the economic corridors in the north,
east and Iskandar Malaysia in the south. We wanted to be out there in front, prepared. I also
felt that Road Builders businesses, management and professionals could be integrated into
our group relatively well.
Three, organic growth is slow, and building a management team comprising a big number
of new talented individuals would take too long. With RBH in our stable, we would instantly
inherit a good and experienced management team, bulk up our construction and property
divisions and add the sorely lacking Malaysian infrastructure assets to complement IJMs
overseas ones.
Finally, the acquisition price was cheap. RBH share price had been declining because
of slow order book build-up. The concession assets were still early into maturity producing
low profits or incurring losses that were dragging their group earnings. This will change
dramatically once inflexion point is reached. As for its property arm, earnings were, in my
view, sedentary. It could be dramatically accelerated with a push.
Rumours had been rife for some time that the public listed RBH was up for sale. In the first
week of October, there was heavy off market trading of RBH shares, and it sent the business
media into an overdrive. The next few days were eventful, RBH shares were heavily traded
he Big Picture
105
and culminated in a notice of resignation filed to Bursa Malaysia by executive vice chairman
and director Chua Hock Chin on 5 October 2006 after selling his 68 million RBH shares (13%
equity interest). Chua was the substantial shareholder of RBH.
The bet was on MMC Berhad as the likely buyer given its penchant for infrastructure
concessions with the potential of generating recurrent income. IJMs name hovered in the
shadows, as an indirect candidate via MMC subsidiary Zelan Berhad, one of IJMs largest
substantial shareholders. RBH came with concessions; the two toll highways of Besraya
and New Pantai Expressway and two ports of Kuantan and Kemaman, and a listed property
subsidiary. The concessions were the piece de resistance for IJM, which had a long history of
misses with infrastructure investment concessions in Malaysia. Having failed to score on its
own bat, it decided to buy them in the marketplace.
The acquisition, however, was part of a bigger agenda as far as IJM was concerned.
It was a logical progression, one deemed necessary for both companies to move forward.
The shrinking addressable domestic construction market in Malaysia, with its political
constraints and maturing economy relative to the growing sizes of both companies meant
that construction giants such as IJM (second largest in Malaysia) and RBH (third largest) had
to look beyond the national border to sustain their principal activity of construction. The
days of a one-market focus were well and truly over for both of them. Merged, they would
Kuantan Port in
Pahang entered the
IJM fold following the
acquisition of Road
Builder Holdings
Berhad.
106
Besraya Highway is a
toll concession that
came with Road Builder.
The 15.5km highway
is the alternative route
for south-bound traffic
between Kuala Lumpur
and Seri Kembangan,
Balakong and Putrajaya.
107
2000s
have the financial and operational clout to compete in the global market place, especially
in the booming construction and infrastructure markets of the economic powerhouses of
China, India and the oil rich Gulf States. It was an intensely competitive arena of seasoned
international players, where negotiated contracts were a rarity and margins thin. Only
companies of substance stood to gain in these theatres of action.
Major shareholder Chua Hock Chin started Road Builder (M) Sdn Bhd in 1985, listed it in 1993
and transformed the company into a construction conglomerate with an order book in excess
of RM1.0 billion, with projects in Malaysia and overseas, particularly India. RBH had also
diversified into property development, toll roads and ports and had a market capitalisation
of RM1.4 billion. Businesswise, it was an IJM rival. Chuas unexpected exit from the company
he founded after more than two decades was interpreted as part of his plan to call it a day
while the company was riding high.
Krishnan Tan said to the press at that time, The acquisition, which I prefer to call a
merger, is not an ego trip for me or IJM. Yes, it put me and IJM in the news for quite some
time, and it helped raise the share prices of both companies. Initially though, the response of
the investment community was subdued. Most could not appreciate the big picture behind
the deal, and some even questioned why pay RM1.6 billion when you could just employ
another 50 people. When we explained, many began to appreciate the implications the deal
had in the consolidation of industry players and the firepower it gave the enlarged IJM in
the context of development and opportunities not just in Malaysia but also in the region. Not
surprisingly, the rating of our stock went from neutral (analysts initially said there will be a
large overhang of new shares arising from the deal) to a buy rating with a forecast target of
as much as RM11.00!
There was strong buying support from foreign funds, underscoring their confidence in the
pumped up IJM. The winner of the Asia Money Best Managed Malaysian Company in 2006,
IJM was recognised in the marketplace for its foresight, professional management and strong
fundamentals. IJM share prices began to climb, outperforming the benchmark index, and for
the financial year ending 31 March 2007, hit RM8.65, an increase of almost 70% from RM5.10
at the close of the previous financial year. Market capitalisation almost tripled, from RM2.45
billion at end of FY2006 to RM7.00 billion at end of FY2007. Meanwhile, the asset portfolio
swelled from RM4.12 billion to RM10.00 billion.
By 26 February 2007, IJM announced that it had received acceptances for 90.41% interest in
RBH following the mandatory general offer to shareholders to buy their shares. It then invoked
Section 34 of the Securities Commission Act 1993 to compulsorily acquire the remaining
RBH shares. The acquisition was completed in April 2007 and paid in shares, with one new
IJM share issued at RM6 per share for every two existing RBH shares. Investment holding
company Road Builder (M) Holdings Bhd was taken private and it became a subsidiary of the
parent company, along with its 50 plus subsidiaries and more than 20 associate companies.
108
109
2000s
RBH chairman of the day, Tengku Ahmad Rithaudeen bin Tengku Ismail, recalls events leading
up to the acquisition, which he prefers to call a merger because discussions were conducted
in a transparent and professional manner. He notes that both companies were in the same
kind of business, although RBH was more of a contractor while IJM had a more diversified
base. RBHs construction business during this period was quiet. So were its ports, especially
Kuantan Port.
In my assessment, the offer price was fair, he says. It was based on one IJM share in
exchange for two RBH shares. I was proven right later because RBH shares began to appreciate
after the merger.
The merger benefited IJM because it gained good assets such as RB Land, the port and
toll highway concessions. It also inherited RBHs talent pool of experienced and dedicated
management executives and engineers. Among those who come to mind are David Wilson, an
experienced engineer with sound project management expertise. Wilson and Lee Teck Yuen
(TY Lee) both board members of the holding company, were appointed to the IJM board. TY
Lee played a key role in ensuring the smooth transition of RBH staff to IJM.
Naturally,
there
were
some
reservations about the merger but most
senior executives recognised the light
that shone at the end of the merger
tunnel. They included Soam Heng Choon
who headed RB Land, Wong Soon Fah
and Ho Phea Keat who helmed Kuantan
Port, Neoh Soon Hiong who led the
toll division and Lee Chun Fai from the
finance division.
IJM behaved very professionally,
acknowledging the talent of these men
who were appointed as members of the
groups senior management team. The IJM
chairman invited me to join the board but
I declined because I felt I was getting too
old. However, I was retained as chairman
of Kuantan Port Consortium and Besraya
Sdn Bhd that have been under my watch
since their incorporation.
Another board member who concurs with these views is former RB Land board member
Boey Tak Kong, who was appointed as a director of the IJM Land board. He was previously
a board member of RB Land. IJMs policy of being transparent during the entire exercise
prevented a brain drain. It won the talent war, says Boey Tak Kong, who is no newcomer to
M&A. Referring to his own career as transformation journey of take-overs, he traces his first
experience at Econstates Berhad that was absorbed into RBH following a reverse take-over.
Econstates was subsequently renamed RB Land Berhad, and Boey appointed to the board.
Following the IJM acquisition, the public listed RB Land was renamed IJM Land, and the assets
of IJMs property division were injected into it. Boey was retained in the IJM Land board, and
stepped down in 2012.
Boey credits RBH board member TY Lee for keeping the RB team intact when they
moved to IJM. TY Lee called for meetings and kept everyone informed on the progress of the
acquisition. Through regular dialogue, he ensured seamless interfacing of assets, especially
human capital. As a result, IJM succeeded in inheriting well-performing staff from RBH. There
was little sabotage during the transition.
Meanwhile, the entire RB Land board migrated to IJM Land. This is success story, from
the perspective of both companies. Prior to the takeover, RB Land had cash flow but struggled
with its hotel business. Its dividend pay-out was modest but it came with good assets and
experience in township development. In the amalgamation that followed, IJM injected
income-yielding assets such as its high end condominiums and build-and-lease properties
into the public listed company. IJM Land, meanwhile, inherited a sizeable land bank from
RB Land, and gained a presence in key urban areas in Malaysia, especially in Johor, Negeri
Sembilan and Melaka. Turnover rose sharply, from RM295 million in FY 2008 prior to the takeover to more than RM1 billion in FY 2010.
Another strategic move was appointing Krishnan Tan as the chairman of IJM Land. He
served as the bridge, linking IJM and RB senior executives. His oversight instilled confidence
in former RB Land board members and management, who found comfort in having guidance
from someone who had led the acquisition and was also the managing director of the holding
company. Boey says Krishnan Tan is adept at communicating well with directors and keeping
them well-informed of decisions taken at board level. Under his stewardship, IJM Land grew
to become one of the top five developers in the country, with a national property portfolio.
Its turnover grew and so did its bottom-line and the ability to pay dividends. That makes
institutional investors happy.
With the acquisition behind them, the process of integration occurred swiftly to enable staff
to settle down to business as usual. Each company had projects in hand and the reputation
for timely delivery to safeguard. IJM was no newcomer to this, as its entire existence is based
on the integration of three companies. Many old hands were still there, including Tan who
had worked through the ups and downs of integration of the merger of IGB Construction,
Jurutama and Mudajaya in the 1980s. The experience and the existence of proven systems and
processes made the task relatively painless this time around.
It was a merger of equals, and the result was the doubling of almost everything staff
numbers, assets, market capitalisation, construction order book, property development
projects and land bank. IJM now had a diversified order book by category and region. For the
first time in the groups history, turnover and profits more than doubled. Turnover soared
from RM2.31 billion in 2007 to RM4.64 billion in 2008, with the RBH acquisition acknowledged
Seremban 2 is an
integrated township
in Negeri Sembilan,
sprawling over
2,300 acres.
112
113
2000s
as having played a contributory role in this sterling result. Operational profits rose 2.5
times during the same period, from RM319.0 million to RM796 million. It was a great 25th
anniversary present for IJM.
Three IJM divisions came under the radar during the period of integration and asset
rationalisation construction, property development and infrastructure. RBH core companies
were rationalised and fitted into the existing organisational structure of IJM; two became
part of the construction division, three entered property development (each came with their
respective realty companies) and five into infrastructure.
In his address at the first post-merger IJM annual dinner held in 2007, Tan said that the
IJM order book of RM4.70 billion was given a hefty shot in the arm when RBHs own order
book of RM1.1 billion was injected into it. The result was an all time high of RM5.8 billion,
pushing up IJM as the nations second biggest builder. Thats an average of RM250 million
a month in construction billings and that needs working capital of at least RM500 million.
Thats something the group has never seen. Now picture the new jobs in the pipeline such as
the Karachi Expressway in Pakistan, jobs in India as well as local prospects such as the West
Coast Expressway, National Cancer Institute and so on.
114
115
2000s
The first post-merger annual report proudly proclaimed a sharp increase in productivity,
with revenue per employee increasing by more than 41%, PBT per employee by 76% and
value addition per employee by about 50% of value. These results vindicated the decision to
acquire RBH and the success of the integration exercise.
While on all counts, the acquisition was a positive move, profit & loss-wise it had
serious repercussions, resulting in IJMs first loss ever. The shadow was cast by the merger
goodwill write-off. IJM was hit by the application of the FRS 3: Business Combination
of the Malaysian Standards Accounting Board that regulates the financial accounting of
public listed companies in Malaysia. Instead of the standard practice of determining the
purchase consideration based on the share price at the time of the acquisition, it required
the value at time of completion of the transaction that occurred six months later. As the
investing public began to appreciate the acquisition better, IJMs share price began to
climb. The share price of IJM had increased markedly during this period, from RM6.00 per
share to RM8.80. In the CEOs Review of Operations in the IJM Annual Report 2008, Tan
explained the situation:
Though the merger was well-received by the investment community, the resultant increase
in IJMs share price brought new challenges in the form of the FRS 3: Business Combination
that required the purchase consideration to be valued at the IJM share price at the date of
completion, thus artificially creating a goodwill item that cannot be sustained going forward
without encumbering future earnings. When this predicament became obvious, I quickly
sought views of fund managers and shareholders. Surprisingly, the response was unanimous.
They said, KT, take the hit and dont encumber your future earnings. After all, it is a non-cash
item. It was extremely comforting.
Thus the group had booked in a one-off impairment of merger goodwill amounting to
RM940.86 million that resulted in the groups current financial year loss before tax and after
tax of RM144.85 million and RM300.16 million respectively. This resulted in negative retained
earnings at company level and subsequently the company obtained a court sanction to off-set
the negative retained earnings against the share premium account to the extend of RM922.26
million, thus reinstating a positive earning position. The impairment written off is a nonrecurrent and no-cash transaction, and the groups future earnings and operational strengths
are not expected to be impaired by the write-off.
Known for paying dividends even during hard times, IJM did not pay any dividends to
shareholders in 2008, the first in its 25-year corporate history.
IJM celebrated its 25th silver anniversary in 2008 in the afterglow of the biggest coup of its
lifetime, the acquisition and successful merger of RBH into its ranks, PBT loss notwithstanding.
The group also had other corporate milestones under its belt, the most significant being the
listing of three of the groups five divisions. They had maturity, a track record of profitability
and strong leadership, and the parent company reckoned it was time to recover some hardearned investments ploughed into making them stalwarts in their respective industries.
First cab off the rank was the plantations division, the outsider
that was the groups saving grace during construction doldrums.
On 2 July 2003, the wholly owned subsidiary was listed as IJM
Plantations Berhad (IJMP) on the Main Board of the Kuala Lumpur
Stock Exchange following the acquisition of the listing status
of Rahman Hydraulic Tin Berhad. The public flotation resulted
in the dilution of the groups investments to 49.4%, mainly as a
result of distribution of IJMP shares to IJM shareholders (it also
held RM50 million in RCULs that it could convert to 100 million
shares) making IJMP an associate company. Still, IJMP continued
to be a strong revenue contributor, posting an increase of 16.70%
in revenue and 17.11% in pre tax profit that year.
In 2004, operations in the industry division were rationalised
with an internal merger that culminated in the indirect listing of
IJMs quarrying arm, Malaysian Rock Products Sdn Bhd and its subsidiaries. The groups 20%
associate, Industrial Concrete Products Berhad (ICP), a public listed company since 1996,
served as the vehicle of this exercise. In 2004, IJM acquired control over ICP following the
acquisition of Hume Industries Bhds shares in ICP and making a mandatory general offer for
the rest of the shares. This was followed in 2005 with IJM disposing its entire interest in the
Malaysian Rock Products Group to ICP for shares in the company. The group then reduced its
equity interest in ICP to 66.3% through placements to institutions to comply with the public
shareholding spread requirement. Thus ICP emerged as the flagship of the groups industry
division in 2005.
116
117
2000s
A somewhat similar scenario was played out in the property division following the
acquisition of RBH that came along with the public listed RB Land Holdings Berhad. On 25 July
2007, IJM announced the disposal of its
wholly owned subsidiary IJM Properties
Sdn Bhd to RB Land, a 70% indirect
subsidiary via RBH. This proposal was
approved by the Securities Commission
and at the Extraordinary General Meeting
held on 16 June 2008. Three days later, on
19 June 2008, RB Land Holdings Berhad
was officially renamed IJM Land Berhad.
The media speculated over the listing
of the India operations, but it proved
IJMs quarrying business is managed by Malaysian Rock Products that has quarries in strategic locations in Kedah, Selangor, Negeri Sembilan, Pahang and Johor.
wishful thinking. Then suddenly, the fair weather turned gloomy with the onslaught of the
global credit crisis that began when Lehmann Brothers filed a Chapter 11 Notice of Bankruptcy
on 15 September 2008. The celebratory tone of the 2008 Annual Report made way for a more
sombre mood in the 2009 Annual Report where the Chairmans Statement said: The global
economy grew at 3.4% in 2008. This figure, however, belies the extent of the worst global
decline seen since the 1930s, although this may only become evident in 2009. He painted
a picture of a world tainted by widespread wealth destruction, rising delinquencies and
deteriorating business and consumer confidence, and forecast a challenging year ahead.
Structural reforms instituted in
Malaysias banking and financial system
in the aftermath of the 1997 Asian
Financial Crisis helped break the fall
of the Malaysian economy. In addition,
For IJM, acquisition is about fuelling growth, not buying revenues, says managing director
a safety net was thrown by the new
Krishnan Tan. When IJM launched the M&A of MRCB in 2010, it was to tap the synergies that existed
government of the day led by Mohd Najib
between our two organisations. The fact that they shared a common substantial shareholder,
Employee Provident Fund (EPF), helped ease the passage of the take-over. However, the two
Tun Abdul Razak, who took office in
parties could not agree over the leadership roles following the merger.
mid-2008. To arrest the slowdown of the
Tan shared the inside story: In any merger, there will be two sets of leaders, but we believe
economy, the government implemented
it cannot have two chief executives and two chief financial controllers. IJM has a good history of
two stimulus packages totalling RM67
post-merger integration, handling human resource issues sensitively. Besides, when IJM acquires
billion. Subsequently, the government
a company, it intends to have strong management control thats non-negotiable. Ultimately, our
launched the national Economic
goal is to integrate quickly and move forward without becoming embroiled in battling egos.
Months after the official announcement, the IJM-MRCB merger was called off.
Transformation Programme (ETP) to
fast-track Malaysias goal to become
a high-income economy by 2020. The starting point of the ETP was the implementation
of concrete changes in specific sectors and areas of the economy. Twelve national key
economic areas were identified and given special attention: oil, gas and energy; palm oil &
rubber; financial services; tourism; business services; electrical and electronics; wholesale
and retail; education; healthcare; communications content and infrastructure; agriculture;
and Greater Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley. The 10th Malaysia (2011-2015) translated several of
them into concrete action plans, together with budgets. Among others, priority was given
to improve public transportation systems, rural road networks and public utilities and the
creation of vibrant liveable cities.
The home market became bullish again, what Krishnan Tan described as an oasis of
positive economic activity blessed with a sound financial system. It presented a feast of
opportunities for the pumped up and regrouped IJM, the much vaunted silver lining in
otherwise grey skies that hovered over its international operations in the post-2008 global
meltdown. As expected, IJM landed a few coveted jobs under the 10th Malaysia Plan (20102015), notably the West Coast Expressway and a substantial package for the construction
of the multi-billion 156-km KL Mass Rapid Transit, the biggest infrastructure project in
Malaysia budgeted under the 10th Malaysia Plan.
118
IJM had been trawling the market place for toll highway
concessions in Malaysia, with which it had considerable
success in China, Argentina and India. It was difficult to explain
to foreign clients and the investor community why IJM did not
have a track record of toll concessions in Malaysia. It became
embarrassing, says Krishnan Tan, group managing director
(1997-2010).
Eventually, the bad streak ended in 2005, when IJM bought
stakes in the concessionaires of the West Coast Highway (later
renamed West Coast Expressway) and Lebuhraya KajangSeremban. Both were troubled companies.
On 30 May 2005, IJM entered into a share purchase
agreement to acquire a 25% stake in Kumpulan Europlus
Berhad, with a call option to acquire a further 5%. Kumpulan
Europlus was then finalising its concession agreement for
the proposed West Coast Expressway. First awarded in 2007,
the concession could not be implemented because of the
escalation in building material prices and the global financial
crisis of 2008/9 that made it unbankable. The concession was
subsequently re-negotiated and a revised agreement signed
on 2 January 2013, in which Kumpulan Europlus owned 80%
equity interest and IJM the remaining 20% stake in the West
Coast Expressway Sdn Bhd.
On 30 September 2005, IJM entered a Definitive
Agreement with Antah Holdings Berhad, KASEH Lebuhraya
Sdn Bhd and Lebuhraya Kajang-Seremban Sdn Bhd (LEKAS)
to participate in the concession for the 44.3-km-highway
linking Kajang to Seremban for a period of 33 years. The
project dates back to 1997, when the concession was awarded.
Highway construction began in 2002 but stalled when the
original concessionaire KASEH faced financial problems. The
project was revived in November 2006 following a takeover
by the new concessionaire LEKAS, the special purpose vehicle
incorporated to replace KASEH. IJM Corporation Berhad and
KASEH Sdn Bhd are both equity shareholders of LEKAS.
119
2000s
120
10
Lessons in Leadership-3
Krishnan Tan Boon Seng
Group Managing Director, 1997-2010
While I was the most junior of the newly formed senior management team, I was no listening
post, says Krishnan Tan who joined IJM when it was formed in 1983. The pioneers gave me
room to talk, accepted me from an early stage as one of them, and treated me like a principal
even though I was not an owner-operator like them. They appointed me an alternate director
early. As the only accountant amidst engineers, I became almost omnipresent. I was kept
in the loop because of the corporate financial and tax implications of the business, and
participated in most of the negotiations especially during IJMs period of diversification
and internationalisation that occurred during the tenure of my predecessors. By the time
I took over, I had a good grasp of IJMs construction, property, industry, plantations and
infrastructure businesses.
While not hands-on in engineering projects like my predecessors, I was involved in
strategising and chasing for jobs. I had a decent macro view of the construction business.
From the finance vantage point, one tends to have a birds eye view of the entire business.
121
2000s
IJM sifu Yap Lim Sen could pick a winner from afar. He had met
the up-and-coming financial controller of Kumpulan Perangsang
at board meetings of Negara Properties, a joint venture real estate
company between IGB Corporation Berhad and Kumpulan Perangsang, a Selangor state
corporation. Upon completion of a 7-year scholarship bond to the Selangor government in 1982,
Tan was ready to take on the challenges of the real world of business in the private sector. A
chance meeting with Yap led him to the IGB Group, where Tan says he fell for Yaps charm and
the Volvo company car that Yap promised as a fringe benefit of the IGB employment package.
In 1982, Tan joined IGB as a financial controller, and in a
farewell address to staff in 2010, jestingly declared he had
bragging rights for being involved in the merger negotiations
leading to the formation of IJM, talking to founders such as Yap
The universal model for business is to deliver the bottom line.
Lim Sen, Koh Boon Chor, Lim Choong Kong, Koon Yew Yin, Goh
Accountants play an important role in this respect as they have a
Chye Keat, Ong Yeng Tian, Lim Yong Keat, and Chay Kwok Thong.
good overview of the business. An accountant who can turun padang
They left a strong impression on the 30-something Tan, who, with
(go down to the shop floor) gains invaluable insights that help
the blessings of Yap, quickly switched from IGB to join IJM. He
strengthen his understanding of the business. An accountant with
was impressed the founders practised a cordial, practical and
both the macro view as well as the ground view has the makings of a
common sense approach to important issues at hand. It was an
good chief executive.
approach he admired and chose to emulate during his leadership.
Tan became IJMs first financial controller, the only outsider
in the owner-operator management team. His first responsibility
was to draw up a new and common scheme of service for staff and
a common accounting and reporting system. He noted that the
entire exercise involved a consultative, practical, open door and no
ego approach that had come to characterise the leadership of his
predecessors. It was another lesson in leadership that he chose to
Site visits provide invaluable insights of the groups operations.
adopt during his tenure.
he Accountant as CEO
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-3
122
123
2000s
124
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-3
125
2000s
executive) share option issues and there were even two issues of
warrants to staff, which is unprecedented in corporate Malaysia.
More importantly, we gave them a good environment to put
their skills to work and take risks in an entrepreneurial way to
grow our group.
A perennial optimist, Tan saw opportunities in threats, and
like the founding fathers before him, dared to take risks to move
IJM forward. The devastating 1997 Asian Financial Crisis that
unfolded shortly after he took office instigated the Malaysian
government to adopt a regime of fiscal discipline and fiscal
consolidation. Put simply, it meant construction jobs were scarce.
Worse, in repairing the economy, the government priority was to
resuscitate the fallen heroes of the New Economic Policy, and IJM
was not one of them. With the support of the board, Tan pressed on with IJMs first mover
strategy of catching the growth potential of Asias emerging markets. To him, the 21st century
was the Asian Century of promise, not one to be approached with trepidation.
There was potential and we took the necessary risks, says Tan. The key is good risk
management, to deal with changing circumstances precipitated by political changes or
economic problems. With this mindset, IJM ventured into the newly liberalised India and the
oil rich Middle East. This time around, IJM was not starving; we had a full stomach. We had
strong balance sheets and could absorb losses. We could afford to be choosy, and run when
there was doubt. Initially, IJM positioned itself for construction and infrastructure investments
in India. Later, we diversified into property, industry and plantations, a replication of IJM in
the subcontinent.
Tan advocates looking beyond the groups construction focus for long term growth
sustainability. Previously, the risk-reward equation favoured construction because we
operated in a more regulated environment where the Malaysian government fixed the
price of key building materials. Traders gave good credit terms. So with a small capital
outlay it was possible to make big money. Things changed in the 1990s, when market forces
began to dictate the price of goods and services in the industries we operated. Contract
conditions were getting more onerous and projects became technically and financially more
demanding. And we had to move to overseas markets to grow. As a result, we had to take
bigger risks to enjoy rewards. My training said that if IJM focuses solely on construction,
the group would become vulnerable. In the world of hedge funds and volatile commodity
prices, it was vital to grow our other businesses to diversify contributions to our bottom
line. While the construction division must be recognised and acknowledged for the earnings
and platform it gave for us to grow, the new realities of the business must be accepted.
My predecessor Goh Chye Keat led IJM into the property game, says Tan. I had a
healthy attachment for the palm oil plantation business. Industry was already a part of IJM
since Day 1. Our international ventures resulted in infrastructure concessions, an asset class
that could provide order book, recurrent income and increasingly easily monetised. While
construction turnover was big, profit margins were becoming more and more compressed.
Over time, construction could no longer drive the groups bottom line significantly without
taking greater levels of risk.
History has proven time and time
again that when there is an economic
slowdown, construction takes a big hit.
It happened in the aftermath of the 1985,
1997 and 2008 recessions. The lessons of
2008 were insightful. We had the highest
construction order book ever in early 2008.
As the commodity prices ravaged through,
we were counting losses in millions by the
day. Fortunately, the collapse of Lehmann
Brothers brought a respite to this but
it also brought other challenges such
as escalating debt costs. It has taken us
more than four years to recover from its
aftermath. Thankfully, the performance of
our plantations, industry and infrastructure
divisions put the smile back on our faces.
That is why I was almost evangelical about
ramping up capacity and capability across all
divisions notwithstanding the clamour that we are a construction company and it should
get greater attention.
Tan does not believe in micro-managing. When he became chief executive, IJM was into
its 15th year of business and had its talent pool of managers, the best of whom had been
selected to lead divisions. I had highly motivated, very experienced, long serving generals
like Choo Choon Yeow and Goh Chye Koon in construction; Ooi Poay Lum, followed by Teh
Kean Ming in properties; Sim Quan Seng, later Mah Teck Oon, Harry Khor Kiem Teoh and
126
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-3
127
2000s
Yap says
128
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-3
129
2000s
130
11
Lessons in Leadership-4
Teh Kean Ming
Group Managing Director, 2011-to date
and the board because of his track record and trusted to lead, which he did
with a healthy dose of trepidation, deemed desirable since security is mortals
chiefest enemy, as immortalised by the Bard in Macbeth.
Teh is the first of the second generation of leadership of IJM, taking charge of a multibillion-ringgit group with a turnover of RM4.5 billion and more than 100 companies to its
name in 2010. Market capitalisation stood at RM8.4 billion, supported by an investment
community accustomed to Tan, an accountant. It was a great inheritance by any measure. In
an organisation known for consistent growth since inception, it was now Tehs turn to take
IJM to new heights.
He must have given it deep thought while waiting in the wings as deputy managing
director for two years because within months of assuming leadership, he unveiled his game
plan to take IJM to the next level. In September 2011 Teh announced the introduction of the
high performance culture declaring: A successful company may risk a regression if we allow
131
2010s
132
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-4
133
2010s
When Teh assumed the helm of the property division, he spared no effort in building the IJM brand name in the property market.
had listened to me, even though I was a young, inexperienced and an unknown member
of the team. It struck Teh then that listening is an important facet of leadership, and the
high performance culture stresses on this with its employee engagement initiatives such as
myVoice surveys that aim to find out what staff value most and improvements they desire in
the company.
The construction of Mid Valley eventually took off in July 1996, after years of being in
the doldrums, One problem was the site, an abandoned tin mine that had a relatively high
water table. It was also next to a river and proved to be a difficult building site. Nine months
into construction, Teh was seconded to the project team to assist in the construction of the
basement since the team was struggling to build up the basement due to extreme ground
conditions. The entire basement kept flooding and Teh came up with a solution: I suggested
that we emulate the padi field, and build bunds to divide the site, and drain the flood water
segment by segment. We applied this technique to the large Mid-Valley site, and it worked.
The project helped Teh gain recognition as an adept trouble shooter.
Teh spent nine months with the RM900 million Mid Valley Megamall project and
established the routine of meeting contractors every evening to plan the schedule for the
following day, addressing issues that cropped up. This routine saved the client a lot of
money because it enabled us to pre-empt problems and resolve issues ahead of time. Cost
savings and value engineering initiatives reduced the cost drastically because construction
problems were solved on an hourly basis literally. When I left the project nine months later,
my relationship with the IGB chief Robert Tan was good. He appreciated what we had done.
Tehs lateral thinking was noted by the top management and he was entrusted with
prime projects. Unbeknown to him, they had other plans for the young civil engineer, and
he was taken aback when asked to leave the construction division to helm the property
division in 2001, replacing Ooi Poay Lum who was leaving. The property division was
134
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-4
135
2010s
Accomplished as he was as a civil engineer, Teh fumbled in his first year in the property
division. I was inexperienced and did not know the processes and had staff who were very
clued up. I spent a lot of time listening to them and picking up tips on the property business
from them.
It was a lesson in humility for the engineering graduate who had trodden on a rosy career
path till then. It dawned upon him that technical challenges could be easily overcome, but people
are more difficult to manage. He recognised then the importance of clarity and alignment of
purpose to the main vision so that everyone thinks and acts as one. This has now become the
foundation of his high performance culture that introduced the Balanced Scorecard system,
an enhancement of the previous system,
to measure performance by setting clear
strategies, aligning to group objectives,
priorities and stretching targets for
better performance year on year.
As the property head bent on building
IJMs credentials as a serious developer,
Teh had to battle for funds from the
construction chaps who ran the group.
He echoed the views of his predecessor
Ooi Poay Lum of an IJM entrenched in a contractor developer mindset while trying to
make inroads in commercial real estate. IJM needed to make a mark in industry and prove
itself as a serious property developer. There was an urgent need to brand ourselves with
flagship projects, especially in the Klang Valley, the epicentre of well-known developers
then. Teh made a strategic move to turn Riana Green Condominium in Petaling Jaya into a
flagship project as part of brand building for IJM Properties. This positioning gained Riana
Green instant recognition for its well-designed units amidst well-manicured lawns and
landscaped gardens. It also showcased IJMs arrival as a developers developer, especially in
the Klang Valley. In the early 2000s, Riana Green was the single largest condominium under
one management title, with more than 1,300 well designed units that commanded respectable
prices and capital appreciation due to its good after sales and responsible management
services. With the runaway success of Riana Green, the property division began to expand its
horizon in different market segments.
The divisions crowning glory is still a work in progress, The Light along the Penang eastern
shoreline. For Teh it is a project close to his heart and mind, creating a brand new luxury
statement with a development rising from a mud flat, with emphasis on distinctive architecture,
innovative designs, exceptional contemporary finishes and an ambiance of indolence. The Light
is planned to bring to the fore the human relationship with the environment, something he
passionately believes should occur as a rule of thumb in property development.
Envisioned to transform Penang into a world class destination, The Light was a project
in which Teh engaged brand consultants to position and promote regionally. Much thought
went into naming the development, and eventually The Light was chosen because it rolls
off the tongue easily, and is related to an expression of joy, success and vibrancy, says Teh.
It took some convincing of senior members of the company before The Light was approved
and adopted as the name of the development.
Property development is
a fragmented business and there are
300 to 500 developers in Malaysia. The
barrier of entry is not high, and as a
result, we have a lot of players.
Teh Kean Ming,
second general manager of IJM Properties
136
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-4
137
2010s
Another feather in the cap was bringing Tesco Hypermarket to Penang on a build-andlease arrangement that leapfrogged IJM Properties to the top league of property players.
Several other successes followed, including the purpose-built Menara CIMB in Jalan Raja
Laut in Kuala Lumpur that was sold at RM375 million, the single largest transaction for IJM
Properties at that time. Another milestone was the Sentosa Cove development in Singapore,
the first awarded to a Malaysian company.
By 2006, Teh had succeeded in transforming IJM Properties into a division with projects
worth more than RM1 billion. Goh Chye Keat, who had retired as managing director, called
to congratulate Teh on a job well done. By then, Teh was at the
cross roads once again, following the IJM acquisition of Road
Builder in 2007. In the corporate exercise that followed, the
property division was injected into RB Land, the public listed real
estate arm of Road Builder. Overnight, there were two heads of
the property division; Teh was promoted to become IJMs deputy
managing director. Given his talent as a turnaround specialist, he
was entrusted to stabilise IJM operations in India while awaiting
his turn to take over the top job. He did so at the age of 55.
Teh is a case of a rolling stone that defied convention and
gathered invaluable moss, with the propensity to learn, challenge
and establish new boundaries, and the humility to defer to others
when the need arises. He had a firm grip of running a division and
2011: Managing director Teh Kean Ming (left) presenting a gift to Malaysias
how to move things forward, both in Malaysia and internationally,
deputy prime minister Muhyiddin bin Mohd Yassin, who officiated IJMs
especially in India, IJMs largest overseas venture. Best of all, he
Delhi Metro Rail Corporations Metro Express Line (Package C2) in India.
had shown his capability to embrace change without upsetting
Looking on are Krishnan Tan, IJM executive deputy chairman (centre) and
Shaziman Abu Mansor, Malaysias minister of works (right). Top: Making a
the apple cart.
presentation at the function.
Teh now considers himself a bridge, linking the past with the present and future honouring
the traditions and values of the pioneers while meeting the expectations and goals of the next
generation, typically from Generation X and Y. There was also another connection to be made
between IJM staffers and those who once belonged to Road Builder, now a part of IJM. The
latter were readily absorbed into IJM during the integration process, but Teh recognised the
need for them to internalise the IJM culture.
IJM board member, David Wilson, previously from Road Builder, welcomes this move
because it will encourage greater teamwork and enrich further the human capital of IJM.
He is of the view that the affable, people-centric Teh is the right person to bring to pass this
soft infrastructure development within the group.
In terms of leadership, IJM has come full circle. As a second generation leader, Teh
recognised that it was imperative to strengthen further the inner core of IJM its staff, its
culture, and its shared values. This may not be the stuff of dreams, but it was a fundamental
need that had to be addressed for IJM to move up to the next level.
138
LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP-4
2010s
he Scorecard, 30 years on
There are no short cuts when dealing with people, acknowledges Teh. You cannot use
the line I am the boss, and you work for me with the younger generation. It does not work.
Instead, you have to engage them with the endgame.
The High Performance Culture repackaged IJMs winning ways into todays context, and
adopted a formal framework to continuously communicate them to staff across the group.
Champions were appointed in each division to mentor staff on
how to operationalise the High Performance Culture.
The tone was set, and staff have their courses charted to
In 2012, IJM added another new revenue stream: oil & gas, when it acquired
a 10% stake and an additional 15% in convertible bonds in 2013 in the Scomi
improve the quality of human capital in the group. They attend
Group. As an engineering-based company, IJM has the capabilities, resources
workshops, budget exercises, coaching sessions to familiarise
and confidence to participate in the oil & gas sector that will move IJM up the
themselves with the refreshed vision and mission, enhanced
value chain to high value engineering. The O&G sector is a big ticket business,
clarity of strategy and priorities, core values, leadership
with immense potential not only in Malaysia but also the region. Scomi is a big
competencies and employee engagement factors. Gaps in skill
player and a technological company with capabilities in the supply of drilling
sets are identified, and training programmes mapped out so
fluids, waste management, and monorail public transportation business. With
that every staff member becomes an invaluable asset in the IJM
this acquisition, IJM also aims to become involved in oil & gas downstream
activities, and possibly turn this into an important revenue stream.
talent pool.
One lesson I learnt from the Scomi acquisition is that we must never take
The balanced scorecard became the benchmark of staff
the investment community for granted. Although the quantum of investment
performance. It spells out the goals and targets to be delivered.
was small, when we announced it, IJMs share price fell sharply. We were taken
This is particularly important for the younger generation, says
aback by the reaction, and realised that we should have handled better the
Teh. There must be no ambiguity, and their roles and functions
communication with investors and explain clearly to them the reasons for
need to be made crystal clear, and the results well-defined.
our decision. Subsequently, we met key investors several times, and our share
prices recovered.
Generation X and Y dont live to work like previous generations;
139
instead they work well to live well. It is a good philosophy that must be
harnessed for the mutual benefit of the company and staff.
IJM has emerged as a market leader in all its businesses, and the
Teh is an active participant in the staff engagement process, and
prospects ahead are bright. Thirty years on, this is our scorecard:
hosts Luncheons with the CEO, Morning Coffee with the CEO and town
IJM is reputed as a well-managed conglomerate with very
strong delivery capabilities.
hall sessions. He says, People appreciate face-to-face contact with the
IJM is one of the top construction companies in Malaysia.
CEO. I believe in participative management that was promoted by my
In 2012, the order book stood at RM4.36 billion. The West
predecessors, and spend time listening to my generals. Sometimes, a
Coast Expressway concession was awarded in January 2013,
leader can be stonewalled by issues. As a leader, you cannot be egoistic
and IJM hopes to pick up sizeable construction jobs from
and think you know all. IJM has a presence in different economic
the West Coast Expressway that stretches from Banting in
sectors, so it is important to seek out those who know better for advice.
Selangor to Taiping in Perak. It will be IJMs single largest
contract.
In IJM, some things remain non-negotiable, says Teh, Foremost
IJM Land is in the Top 10 of property development companies
among them is trust, reliability and integrity, the foundation of IJMs
in Malaysia, with a sizeable land bank in strategic locations in
motto, We Deliver. When trusted to do a job, IJM staff are expected
Malaysia. It is reputed to be a strategic developer.
to deliver it in an honest and credible way. When there is proof of
IJM is a market leader in pretensioned spun concrete (PSC)
misdemeanour or irregularity, we will not hesitate to take action, and
piles and it continues to look for opportunities to expand to
will not shy away from reporting cases to the police.
serve the buoyant construction industry, economic corridors
Remuneration remain a sticky issue, especially with the middle
of Malaysia and regional markets.
IJM Plantations is reputed to be a well-managed plantation
management desiring instant rewards and incentives. Stating IJM
company, with good sustainability initiatives. With
salaries are slightly above industry norm, Teh says, IJM has been
accelerated planting underway in Indonesia, earnings are
paying consistently good bonuses to staff. As such, total payout (fixed
expected to double in 2017.
and variable) commensurates with market practices. In terms of
IJM is the second largest infrastructure company in Malaysia
numbers, salaries account for a substantial percentage of operating
in terms of tolled kilometres. There are three tolled highways,
costs. We acknowledge that we have low performers on our payroll. I
and with the inclusion of the West Coast Expressway five
years on, the toll bank will surge by another 233 km.
believe the High Performance Culture will address this issue because
IJM is well recognised as a reputable Malaysian company
the balanced scorecard system will help to ensure that every staff pulls
in India.
his or her weight. Their enhanced performance will have a multiplier
IJM-owned Kuantan Port is being expanded to a megaport
effect it will enhance revenue, profit, shareholder value, and translate
to serve growing bilateral trade between Malaysia-China as
into better staff rewards. We believe in pay-for-performance. This has
well as Asia-Pacific markets.
been the hallmark of IJM.
Like his predecessors, Teh is a firm advocate of the shared destiny
principle. IJM is not a single industry company, and when one industry
does not perform well due to an economic downturn, the others save the day. History
has shown that each division has had its own good times and bad, but as a group,
IJM has performed relatively well. We are like a family, where members close
ranks to support the one in trouble. This simple act of faith in each other has
helped IJM remain in the black in the past 30 years. This is the legacy of our
founders, who in their wisdom chose to diversify the group without splitting
it apart as self-sufficient units, especially when they became listed. This
united front defines the character of IJM, and has helped the group grow
into a sustainable, international conglomerate. It is a priceless legacy that we
should cherish.
140
2000s
12
Chairmen
IJM has been blessed with a board that since its incorporation in 1983
As IJM pioneers retired one after another, the board departed from its original ownermanagement profile to welcome representatives of the largest shareholders as well as enlarge
the team of non executive independent directors, all experienced professionals. Thirty years
on, the IJM Board bears little resemblance to the first. The only link with the past is executive
deputy chairman Krishnan Tan, who provides continuity to an organisation that has grown
beyond the wildest dreams of its founding fathers.
When IJM celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2008, it consisted of 13 directors. Today, it is a
leaner and more streamlined board with nine members, including the chairman, who bring
to the table a breadth of knowledge and experience deemed indispensable in an intensely
globalised and competitive world.
141
142
143
2010s
Tan Sri Dato Ir (Dr) Wan Abdul Rahman bin Wan Yaacob
Wan joined the IJM board in 1996 as an independent non executive director before being
appointed as chairman when IJMs pioneer chairman Tan Sri Dato Dr (Ir) Ahmad Azizuddin
bin Haji Zainal retired in 2003.
Previously with the Public Works Department where he served the last six years before
retirement in 1996 as the director general, Wan held directorships in Lingkaran Trans Kota
Holdings (chairman), Lysaght Galvanised Steel Berhad (chairman), Bank of America Malaysia
Berhad, MDF, NCB Holdings Berhad and Northport (Malaysia) Berhad. He retired from the
IJM Board in 2011.
His observation of IJM is that it is one of few public listed companies where the board
is well represented by the senior management. At one time, the managing director, deputy
managing director and another senior executive were executive directors, unlike most
companies where only the managing director represents management. This set-up, he says,
enables the board to have a good understanding of management proposals and arrive at
sound decisions.
I also sit on several other boards, where members do not become involved in projects.
At IJM, every large project, both local and international, must be presented to the board for
approval. This system of check-and-balance entrusts the board to assume responsibility for
big ticket projects, and not allow management to shoulder the blame when they falter. Time
is also factored in to provide for quick decision making. This entire process is an integral part
of the IJM culture since it was formed, and survives till this day.
144
Managing
Directors
2010s
145
146
Deputy
Managing Directors
First Deputy Managing Director
Chay Kwok Thong
Second Deputy Managing Director
NOTE
2010s
147
148
149
2010s
150
2010s
Executive
Directors
Executive Directors
Chee Wan Yee, Executive Director, 1988-1997
Chee joined Mudajaya Construction in 1981 as a project director involved in IJMs power and
water projects. He was also involved in projects in Vietnam and China. Appointed as alternate
director in 1988, he became an executive director in 1990. He retired in 1993 and continued to
serve on the board till 1997.
Appointed as an alternate director in 1995, he resigned from the board in 1998 to pursue
his own interests.
Khoo Chew Meng, Executive Director, 1988-1998
Technical College alumni Khoo joined Jurutama in 1976 as a senior engineer after serving the
Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR). He joined the IJM Board as an alternate director in 1988, and was
made executive director in 1994. His area of specialisation was pre-fabricated housing and
projects in Sarawak. He was instrumental in leading IJM on the road towards attaining ISO
9001 certification.
The MBA graduate from Golden Gate University in USA retired as an executive director in
1998, and remained on the board as a non executive director until August 2001.
151
152
2010s
Long Serving
Non Executive
Directors
153
154
155
2010s
In a strategic move, RB Land, the listing vehicle of IJMs property division that was renamed
IJM Land, invited Krishnan Tan to become its chairman. We requested Krishnan Tan to chair
IJM Land when he was the managing director of the holding company. Our reason was simple:
we wanted someone to steer the property plc to greater success. On hindsight, it was the right
move. Today, IJM Land (previously RB Land) has grown several times since 2008. It is now
bigger than that of developer IGB, once the parent company of IJM.
Naturally, when two work cultures merge, there are bound to be differences. There were
difficulties adapting to IJM ways among some Road Builder staff but overall performance and
staff productivity results show that decisions made then were right.
156
2010s
Name of Director
Nationality
Malaysian
First Director
2
16 July 1983
18 September 1989
18 September 1989
10 April 1990
25 July 1985
16 May 2001
16 May 2001
22 January 2008
1 November 1988
10 April 1990
10 April 1990
15 May 1997
Director
1 November 1988
10 April 1990
10 April 1990
30 September 1998
1 November 1993
28 December 1995
16 April 1984
3 April 1989
Director
16 April 1984
1 November 1988
Managing Director
1 November 1988
27 March 1996
1 November 1988
10 April 1990
27 March 1996
31 December 1996
10 April 1990
1 October 1994
Non-Executive Director
31 December 1996
16 August 2006
1 October 1994
5 September 1998
5 September 1998
15 August 2001
16 April 1984
28 February 2003
1 November 1988
1 October 1994
16 April 1984
18 January 1986
1 October 1994
1 January 1997
1 January 1997
24 March 1999
16 April 1984
17 February 1995
Non-Executive Director
24 March 1999
22 May 2002
12 June 1984
1 November 1988
18 September 1989
23 June 1994
1 November 1988
10 April 1990
22
18 September 1989
23 June 1994
12 June 1984
30 September 1988
23
1 November 1988
1 October 1994
10 April 1990
13 September 1991
12 March 1992
28 November 1996
7 July 1993
5 January 2001
23 June 1994
30 September 2003
25 July 1995
16 April 1998
Tan Sri Dato (Dr) Haji Ahmad Azizuddin bin Haji Zainal Abidin
Dato Mohd Tahir bin Haji Abdul Rahim
Koon Yew Yin
Ong Yeng Tian
Malaysian
Malaysian
Non-Executive Director
20
Malaysian
Malaysian
Malaysian
21
Malaysian
Malaysian
Director
Malaysian
Malaysian
Singaporean
12 June 1984
31 October 1988
1 November 1988
1 November 1993
1 November 1988
5 May 1997
Malaysian
Malaysian
Director
24
Malaysian
Director
18
Malaysian
Director
Malaysian
Malaysian
Director
Chay Kwok Thong
17
Malaysian
14
12 June 1984
Director
18 September 1989
16
Malaysian
Director
13
16 April 1984
Retired / Resigned
17 February 1995
Malaysian
Director
11
21 December 1983
Appointed
21 December 1983
Director
10
Malaysian
30 September 1988
Nationality
Malaysian
Director
7
Name of Director
15
21 December 1983
Director
6
No
21 December 1983
Director
5
Retired / Resigned
16 July 1983
Director
4
Appointed
Malaysian
First Director
3
157
Malaysian
Director
25
Malaysian
Director
26
Lai Meng
Malaysian
12 June 1984
3 April 1989
3 April 1989
10 April 1990
27
Director
10 April 1990
1 November 1993
1 January 1997
28
1 January 1997
26 February 2004
25 July 1995
15 May 1997
26 February 2004
31 December 2010
15 May 1997
31 July 2001
1 January 2011
Non-Executive Director
Sim Quan Seng
Malaysian
Malaysian
158
No
Name of Director
Nationality
29
Malaysian
30
31
Appointed
Retired / Resigned
25 July 1995
1 January 1997
1 January 1997
26 February 2004
26 February 2004
29 June 2008
Executive Director
29 June 2008
29 June 2009
Non-Executive Director
30 June 2009
Tan Sri Dato Ir. (Dr) Wan Abdul Rahman bin Wan Yaacob
28 August 2003
28 August 2003
24 August 2011
12 June 1998
17 May 2001
17 May 2001
21 May 2003
12 June 1998
17 May 2001
17 May 2001
22 September 2003
22 September 2003
26 February 2004
26 February 2004
30 January 2010
1 October 1998
4 April 2002
35
36
31 Mar 1999
26 February 2008
26 February 2008
28 August 2012
5 January 2001
30 January 2004
12 April 2002
28 August 2012
30 October 2003
16 October 2006
25 March 2004
13 September 2005
18 August 2004
5 July 2005
1 September 2005
16 August 2006
16 August 2006
1 July 2008
1 July 2008
31 December 2010
1 January 2011
Malaysian
Malaysian
Malaysian
Non-Executive Director
38
Malaysian
Non-Executive Director
39
Malaysian
Non-Executive Director
40
41
44
45
46
47
Malaysian
Malaysian
1 September 2005
30 January 2010
30 January 2010
31 December 2010
1 January 2011
6 Jun 2013
Retired / Resigned
31 October 2005
25 August 2009
5 January 2007
21 April 2008
25 April 2007
24 August 2011
Malaysian
24 August 2011
Malaysian
9 May 2007
21 April 2008
21 April 2008
24 August 2011
Non-Executive Director
30 May 2007
9 November 2012
9 November 2012
Malaysian
British
Non-Executive Director
48
Appointed
2010s
Malaysian
30 May 2007
Malaysian
9 November 2012
Malaysian
Malaysian
Non-Executive Director
49
Malaysian
43
Malaysian
Non-Executive Director
34
Malaysian
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
Malaysian
33
42
Nationality
Malaysian
Name of Director
No
16 November 2012
Malaysian
07 Jun 2013
159
PART 2
Pillars of
Distinction and Pride
Putrajaya International
Convention Centre that
was built by IJM was
described by Jurutera
magazine (November
2006) as a masterpiece,
a marvel of engineering
and the pride and
glory of the Malaysian
engineering sector.
13
CONSTRUCTION
The Leader of the Pack
amidst much pride and exultation. It was a futuristic building like no other in
the country, perhaps in the world: it was imaginative, distinctive and involved
innovative technologies. It also represented the coming of age of Malaysian
professionals who had planned, designed and built it.
For guests from IJM in the audience the biggest surprise of the evening occurred when the
prime minister acknowledged IJM as the contractor of the state-of-the-art building in his
speech. It was a rare public recognition accorded to a contractor, usually the unsung hero of
any landmark project. But Dr Mahathir saw it fit to do so on this occasion because the iconic
structure, which even to the untrained eye represented
an architects dream and a builders nightmare, was
constructed according to design specifications, on
budget and in time for the Organisation of Islamic
Conference (OIC) that Malaysia was hosting later
that year. The head of the construction division then,
Goh Chye Koon, and his project directors, Tan Gim
Foo (current head of construction) and Soo Sik Sang,
remember this as the proudest moment in their
respective careers. It gave me the job satisfaction of
being a builder, says Goh.
IJM had finally arrived as a
The buildings project
contractor of choice in Malaysia.
director, Tan Gim Foo,
The Putrajaya International
who was in charge
Convention Centre project was
of the steel truss
roof describes it as
a turning point for IJM. The
challenging given the
company had cut its teeth as a
complicated geometry
main contractor with large scale
and long span.
164
165
IJM adhered strictly to the Putrajaya local authoritys noise pollution levels.
Picture here shows project staff measuring noise generated by construction
machinery near a residential area in Jalan Lingkaran, Putrajaya.
When IJM was formed, Mudajaya and Jurutama
brought along a whole generation of young engineers
such as Soo Sik San, Tan Gim Foo and Ooi Poay Lum. These
pioneers who led projects provided a lot of mentoring to
their young charges who have worked their way up the
corporate ladder. Today, several occupy leadership positions
in IJM. Mentoring is an integral part of the culture of IJMs
construction business.
Tan Sin Leong, project manager who became construction head, and
later deputy managing director
A selection of IJM projects in Putrajaya (left to right): Attorney Generals Office, Alam Warisan Hotel (now Pullman Putrajaya) and Saujana Bridge.
166
167
he construction supermarket
IJM built the steel-clad faade of the head office of Putrajaya Corporation.
For IJM project directors Tan Gim Foo and Soo Sik Sang, the construction of the Putrajaya
International Convention Centre was challenging in terms of time and roof structure. Delay
was not an option in the RM604 million project. Otherwise our companys head would be on
the chopping board, says Tan Gim Foo We worked day and night, and sometimes the prime
minister would arrive, riding on a horse early in the morning, to inspect work in progress.
We also heard he used a telescope to check on the progress from his office in Perdana Putra
directly opposite the convention centre, five kilometres away.
I was in charge of the steel truss roof, a unique structure with its complicated geometry
and long span. The shape of the roof resembles a pending the carved buckle on the belt worn
to secure the gold-spun sarong worn by Malay royal bridegrooms. The spine truss spanned
80 metres and had a depth that varied between 3.60 metres and 7.50 metres. This spine truss
supported the centre roof, inner roof and part of the outer roof.
The roof required 5,000 tons of steel and had about 20,000 trongs. IJMs steel fabricating
subsidiary Torsco had the technical expertise but we were racing against time, all the time. An
While IJM may pride itself as a diversified conglomerate with five core businesses, it is
essentially identified as a professional construction company led by civil and structural
engineers. It is listed under the Construction category on the Bursa Malaysia while a recent
Google search entry starts with: IJM is one of Malaysias leading construction groups There
is no question as to who is the leader of the pack in IJM: construction. The acquisition of Road
Builder Holdings Berhad (RBH) in 2007 greatly enhanced the capabilities and capacity of
the division. Until 2009, the construction division was the biggest contributor to the groups
turnover and profits. Although profit contributions have been shrinking since, IJM continues
to be judged by the performance of its construction business whose order book has grown
from tens of millions of ringgit at the time of incorporation to breach RM6 billion at its peak in
2008. Construction projects are also the most influential ambassadors of the IJM brand, raising
the companys visibility and potency not only in Malaysia but also in the landscapes of India,
Pakistan, China, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Singapore and Middle East. Three factors account for the
rise of IJM as Malaysias premier builder. One, the comprehensive set of processes and systems
that the founders introduced to breathe professionalism into every fibre of the organisations
being, from the simplest task of a fax transmission to complex tender proposals, from job hire
procedures to income & expenditure entries. The pioneers had worked alongside international
contracting firms and aid agencies and recognised the value of embedding proper systems and
processes in the organisation to monitor work flow as well as to enhance performance and cost
efficiency. The management continues to keep abreast with developments in management and
technology that have been deployed to give IJM an edge as a competitive contractor.
IJM has been to Bangladesh,
Vietnam, India, Pakistan, Hong Kong, Dubai,
Bahrain and Abu Dhabi. The success story
is that we completed all the projects and
left lasting landmarks. The failure is that
we were sometimes unable to make money
from them.
Tan Gim Foo, site manager who became
construction head and
later deputy managing director
168
A Gulf project: Lulu Reef Access Bridge that links mainland Bahrain and the reclaimed Reef Island, a mixed-use development off the coast of Manama.
The devil is in the detail, and IJM paid (and still pays) close attention to it. As a result, IJM
functions like a well-oiled machine, with the confidence and agility to manoeuvre in tight
corners and ride on rocky roads, which included three destabilising global recessions. The
recessions are tests that separated the men from the boys, says
Goh Chye Koon, head of construction (1997-2009). Our zealous
attention to processes and systems enabled us to come up with a
game plan quickly to bounce back. We were serious players, with
The success of the construction division can be
the tools to survive a beating.
attributed to construction professionals who
Professionalism also means the quality of hires, and IJM
made their mark for IJM since its formation.
prides itself for attracting well-qualified engineers, technical
Apart from the founders, we acknowledge the
specialists and professionals from other related construction
contributions of Chay Kwok Thong, Chee Wan
disciplines, who currently account for 73% of the workforce. The
Yee, Tan Sin Leong, Khoo Chew Meng, Ng Aik
company promotes itself as a construction hypermarket, with
Pang, Koay Poon Hock, Richard Fong, Teng
in-house skills sets to undertake jobs of different complexities
Chong Meng, Goh Chye Koon, Choo Choon
Yeow, Loy Boon Chen, Soo Heng Chin, Ooi Poay
and magnitude. IJM is also well-positioned to take advantage of
Lum, Tan Gim Foo, Soo Sik Sang, Mani, Liew Hau
changes occurring in the construction industry. According to the
Seng, Ong Teng Cheng and many, many others.
Master Builders Association Malaysias 50 Years in Nation Building
n praise of
Professionalism
169
publication: There is now a move for closer integration of construction activities and smart
partnering among various industry players for Design & Build contracts and Build-OperateTransfer contracts that are gaining popularity. This is attributed to the fact that the separation
of design and construction functions under the traditional approach could result in mistakes
at the design stage that needed rectification at construction stage, leading to project delays
and cost over-runs due to re-works.
There is also a trend to employ of high achieving graduates in IJM. A few first class honours
graduates, who after proving themselves on the job, have risen to helm divisions such as
construction, property and plantations.
One of them is Tan Gim Foo, appointed the head of the construction division in 2010, and
deputy managing director in 2011. He says, There is a structured career path for engineers
in IJM. I started as a site engineer, and in the field, you cannot adopt the silo approach.
A site engineer has to be attentive to the delivery schedule, and often ends up doing a
lot of things. My site training covered five years, and I moved from conducting surveys
to quality analysis & control, then site supervision and eventually preparing tenders &
contracts. After this, I was promoted to
construction manager, and then elevated to
project manager and eventually to project
I represented IJM in several government delegations overseas. It took us to
director overseeing several projects.
countries such as Kazakhstan, Ghana, Guinea, Mongolia and Libya. We did not win jobs
Once you become a project manager, it
there but we became known. This is the time to network with each other for jobs back
becomes a numbers game. It is about profit
in Malaysia. I also represented IJM in industry organisations such as the Master Builders
margins and management of cash flows,
Association Malaysia and the Construction Industry Development Board. Again, the
coupled with tight construction schedules to
results are neither quantifiable nor felt immediately. However, the contacts are useful
complete projects.
Life on the site is no bed of roses,
and their influence is felt over time.
especially with green-field highway projects
Goh Chye Koon, head of construction division, and later deputy managing director
and developments such as Putrajaya and KL
International Airport. Project engineer Tan
Sin Leong, later deputy managing director (1993-1995), recalls: When I was working in the
East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia, my family was based in Singapore. I used to see my wife
and children on some weekends and the school holidays. My children were raised singlehandedly by my wife for about 12 years. It was the same with other project engineers, who
had to be away from home for extended periods of time. We worked day and night as if we
owned the company.
Tans successor Goh Chye Koon says that the founder directors, mainly civil engineers,
encouraged senior engineers to become intrapreneurs entrepreneurs within the IJM system.
We were given a lot of freedom within the corporate body that consisted of strategic business
units. Each unit head took ownership of it, and ran it like his own business, tendering for jobs,
entering the market, networking with relevant people and organisations. When a project was
profitable, the unit enjoyed the rewards. IJMs basic salary for engineers was pretty average,
but the incentives were great.
170
ecord Breakers
171
The Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia extension that is also the head office of the
Albukhary Foundation.
The Butterworth Outer Ring Road in Penang was constructed to serve the metropolitan areas of Butterworth and Bukit Mertajam that have seen a surge in
vehicular traffic with intense industrial and urban development. The 14-kilometre expressway has six elevated interchanges and a bridge over Sungei Perai.
172
173
Road to Prosperity
IJM was awarded six major packages for the construction of the 775km North South Expressway, Malaysias
longest toll highway that was officially opened in 1994. It was also a key player in other civil engineering
works such roads, highways and bridges, deemed vital for Malaysias growth and development.
PERLIS
THAILAND
KEDAH
Interchange at
Jalan Mesjid Negeri &
Jalan Air Hitam, Penang
SELANGOR
North-South Expressway
Sg. Buloh to Rawang, Selangor
PENANG
PERAK
KELANTAN
Reconstruction of
Federal Highway Route II
TERENGGANU
North-South Expressway
Kuala Kangsar to
Perak River, Perak
Kuala Lumpur
Kuala Lumpur Inner
Road Improvement
North-South Expressway
Prak River to Jelapang, Perak
North-South Expressway
Tapah to Kampar, Perak
PAHANG
North-South Expressway
Slim River to Tajong Malim, Perak
SELANGOR
Putrajaya Primary
Distributor Road
Kuala
Lumpur
NEGERI
SEMBILAN
MELAKA
Highway Rehabilitation
Muar to Pontian, Johor
JOHORE
North-South Expressway
Sedenak to Kulai, Johor
North-South Expressway
Skudai to Johor Bahru, Johor
SINGAPORE
decisions. However, IJM founder Yap Lim Sen, disagrees. He believes that IJM is exactly where
it should be as a professional construction company: a shareholder-driven board with an
autonomous management entrusted to deliver results. IJM managing directors, past and
present, are unanimous in their praise of a board that has always respected and supported
management decisions. Krishnan Tan confirms with: Throughout my time on the board,
there was mutual respect and trust. The board was supportive and management always
delivered. Management was always mindful that it needed the trust and confidence of the
board to perform and in return it must deliver to keep that confidence intact. The case in
point was the RM1.6 billion acquisition of RBH at short notice.
This is the defining character of IJM, a privilege that few construction companies in
Malaysia seem to enjoy. And one that has been fundamental in the rise of IJM from a mid-size
contractor to a premier and diversified construction company in country.
IJMs construction division has survived three recessions that have seen rivals shrink, sold or The Pahang-Selangor Raw Water Transfer Tunnel
vanish. The only black spot in an otherwise clean slate of profits occurred in 2011, described in Hulu Langat-Karak, Malaysia.
as the saddest day for the division by Tan Gim Foo. We lost money for the first time even
though our Malaysia projects were doing well.
He attributes this sad turn of events to the legacy of our international projects. Bluntly
speaking, India let IJM down. The overheated economy melted from the impact of the ruthless
commodity price escalation of 2008 and subsequent international financial breakdown at
a time when IJMs international order book was at a historic high. Inflation reared its ugly
head, and labour, material and energy costs spiralled out
of control. The advent of the global financial crisis in late
2008 made money scarce and interest rates shot through
the roof. Worse, IJM had won projects through highly
competitive bids. In the climate of rising costs and poor
liquidity, payment and collection became problematic.
The construction division had high hopes for the rising
India, which delivered well until then, accounting for
about 50% of the construction order book until 2008. The
sudden turn of events was both a heartache and headache
for IJM, which decided to take the hit once and for all. The
construction division wrote off the losses and went into the
Upgrading of Senai Airport in Johor: IJM constructed the runway extension and built
the airport terminal.
red in 2011. Goh Chye Koon refers to it as kitchen sinking.
174
The Japanese are smart in the way they internationalise
their construction business. They start by establishing trading
companies in new markets. This
gives them the opportunity to
survey the business environment,
establish contacts and find
partners slowly. They dont rush it.
When IJM entered India, we were
opportunistic.
Tan Sin Leong, project manager who
became construction head,
and later deputy managing director
The luxury
condominium
Troika KLCC in
Kuala Lumpur.
175
176
177
178
179
14
Poolside panorama:
view from the swimming
pool of Light Point, a luxury
condominium in The Light
mixed development along
Penangs eastern foreshore.
PROPERTY
On the Ascendancy
land banks on the island of Penang 324.9 acres of real estate on the eastern
shoreline that greets motorists cruising into the island along Penang Bridge.
Once a sleepy knoll of vegetable farms fronted by mud flats inhabited by crabs
and other marine life, this coastline came under the radar of the states urban
planners when they wanted to build an alternative route to convey motorists
living in the industrial belt of Bayan Lepas and new population centres in the
southeast to the city centre of Georgetown in the eastern tip of the island. The
existing arterial road was overburdened with traffic congestion.
On 22 April 1997, the Penang State Government entered a privatisation agreement with IJMs
Jelutong Development Sdn Bhd (JDSB) for the construction of the Jelutong Expressway, from
Jalan Udini to Weld Quay near Penang Port. One thing was clear, the coastal highway that
sliced through densely populated suburbs of Georgetown must be toll-free.
According to EQ newsletter (September 1997) published by IJM Property Division,
Statistically speaking, the project is noteworthy from a social, environmental and political
point of view. It has captured the attention of millions of Malaysians because it is widely
viewed as a project that will rescue Penang island, its people and its businesses from the
kind of traffic gridlock that is choking Kuala Lumpurs progress.
Since this was not a toll concession, the agreement provided for the cost of construction
of the 4.7 km six-lane expressway, subsidised affordable housing for displaced residents
as well as land reclamation along the project corridor to be recovered with property
development. As a result, the state alienated a total of 324.9 acres of the foreshore, including
a sizeable chunk to be reclaimed, to JDSB for property development. EQ newsletter also says,
The development of such a large tract of land, within proximity of Georgetown, literally
from the ground up, is unprecedented in the islands history. As a measure of comparison,
the total development of the states iconic Komtar covers 57 acres, or 17.5% of the area
defined for JDSBs development.
An artist impression of
The Light, Penang that
is set to transform the
eastern shoreline of this
World Heritage island with
a collection of upscale
developments, from luxury
residential units to leisure/
retail/entertainment
components.
184
The toll-free Jelutong Expressway was built in exchange for rights to develop the expressway corridor and land reclaimed alongside it.
Source: The Star, 13 August 1999
185
186
187
Jurutama is also one of the first
wholly Malaysian owned companies to
venture into prefabricated housing when it
undertook a RM12 million project in Penang.
The project involved 1,005 units of low cost
flats in the present day Taman Tun Sardon.
Ooi Poay Lum, first general manager of
IJM Properties Sdn Bhd
onstruction versus
property development
In the early years, there was always the pull and push factor
between the construction and property business in the allocation
of capital within the group. Since IJM was principally a construction
company running a tight cash flow business, it did not have the
luxury to allocate large capital into its property arm, especially
since construction projects are constantly short of funds due to
large amounts of money being stuck in accounts receivables from
progress claims and retention sums. It was thus not willing to put
in higher equity or shareholders funds to reduce the amount of
interest-bearing type of finance needed to acquire land banks and
pay for development costs.
I am proud of my idea to create an in-house property
management subsidiary, Liberty Heritage Sdn Bhd to add aftersales value to IJM properties. Malaysia is a country that pays little
importance to maintenance and the service culture is weak. I can see
today that the building maintenance industry is developing much
faster than before and many buildings today have invested heavily
in expensive plants, equipment and technology because good
maintenance is essential to preserve the value of property assets.
Ooi Poay Lum, first general manager of IJM Properties Sdn Bhd
188
189
Selangor that involved affordable and medium cost housing in safe locations. We pursued
aggressively privatisation projects as well as joint ventures with land owners for projects
that involved low equity and guaranteed sales. Basically, our aim was to keep the construction
boys busy during the recession, says Ooi. The division gathered steam and had a string of
developments in Penang, the Klang Valley and Sarawak.
During the 1990s, the focus in the northern and central regions was on high rise strata
developments because of land constraints and the cosmopolitan lifestyle of Penang and Kuala
Lumpur. It built a condominium in Johor Bahru Sri Mulia but found it difficult to sell.
Thereafter, it concentrated on landed properties in Johor, Sarawak and Sabah.
During this period, the property division began to take shape and a sales team was
appointed to market properties in Penang. Sales offices were also established in Kuala
Lumpur and Sandakan. Fully staffed, and designed with tastefully furnished showrooms, they
aimed to project IJMs image as a serious nationwide developer.
Nusa Duta in Iskandar Malaysia is a freehold development of approximately 127.73 acres. It is a mixed signature development comprising of medium-high to
high end properties.
later appointed to head the property office in the north, and became the general manager of
IJM Properties Sdn Bhd, which was established in 1995. There was synergy between the two
businesses especially since property development could ride on IJMs construction divisions
history of delivering high quality projects, on time and on budget. Not many contractors turned
developers enjoyed this level of professionalism and reputation as technically competent and
trusted builders.
However, the mindset and business culture of a successful contractor versus a successful
developer are different, and it took time for IJM to develop the essential skill sets and market
sophistication to evolve into a successful developer. IGB, our parent company, had earlier
accomplished this under its managing director Yap Lim Sen, a construction man who became
the sophisticated face behind the successes of IGB in the 1980s.
It took about 20 years for IJM to arrive at this destination, but the journey provided useful
lessons and experiences. It began with humble privatised housing projects in Penang and
Initially, my northern team learnt the ropes from our parent company IGB, says Ooi.
We had a good working relationship with our IGB counterparts Ray Cheah, Tan Boon Gark,
Er Ah Huat and PK Poh. They were our mentors, and supported us as peers in a sister
organisation. Personally, my biggest role model was Yap Lim Sen, who I saw as the perfect
professional engineer turned property developer and self-made entrepreneur. This healthy
relationship is another unique feature of the IJM-IGB history.
After going through the first learning curve as a play-safe developer, the property
division was ready to try high end projects that produce higher profits but also carry higher
marketing risks.
INTERNATIONAL CREDENTIALS
IJM has good credentials as a developer overseas.
It began modestly with two residential projects in
Orlando, Florida in the late 1980s. One was called
South Fork, named after the property in the Dallas
television series that was the rage of the day, and
another was Conway Place. It consisted of 107
bungalows that taught IJM the importance of good
planning and design.
The big break came in 1993, when IJM acquired
a 50% interest in OSW Properties Pty Ltd, which had
the rights for a commercial, hotel and residential
development on one quadrant of the famous World
Square Project in Sydney, Australia. Tan Joo Kee was
engaged to lead and manage this project which
had many sceptics as it had stalled for many years
prior to IJMs acquisition.
The main challenge for this project, in addition
to getting the necessary building approvals, was
funding the project. In markets like Australia,
90% of payment for residential units is made
upon completion. The residential tower sat on
the hotel and commercial podium, which meant
191
Community Counts
192
PJ8 is an integrated
service apartment
and office
development in
Petaling Jaya.
193
The exclusive
Laman Baiduri
condominium
overlooks Subang
Jaya Lake in
Selangor.
196
Selangor. In contrast, the Penang platter was a modest RM18 billion. In all probability, the
big timers were also discouraged by Penangs outdated development guidelines that tended
to burden developers with extra obligations as a part of the approval process.
The proclamation of Georgetown as a UNESCO World Cultural Heritage Site in 2008 has
revitalised the Penang property market. Suddenly, the charm of a heritage city began tugging
the heartstrings of those who had left its shores in search of fame and fortune decades earlier.
Cashed up by foreign earnings, many headed back to their place of birth, and were not coy
about investing in multi-million ringgit luxury homes and condominiums. The big boys of real
estate did not wish to pass off on this golden opportunity, and rushed to stake their claim on
We sold assets because the timing was good, and profits were ploughed back for
future investments. Recent divestments include Menara IJM Land and Tesco in Penang, and
AEON Bandaraya Melaka.
Menara IJM Land in Penang
Tesco in Penang
197
198
An evening view of the sprawling Seremban 2 in the distance, as seen from Hill Park in S2 Heights, also an IJM development.
IJM Land has this vision of bringing
life to ordinary spaces. The essence of this
message is conveyed in our tagline, We make
good better, which cuts across all that we do,
deliver and follow-up.
Soam Heng Choon, CEO/managing director of IJM Land
The year 2008 was described as a momentous year for the property
division by group CEO/managing director Krishnan Tan in the first
annual report released by IJM Land, the outcome of the injection of
IJM Properties into RB Land, a listed company on Bursa Malaysia,
on 16 June 2008.
In the IJM universe, the construction and property divisions are
inextricably linked. This is clearly demonstrated in the property
divisions road to public listing. It occurred on the back of IJM
Corporation Berhads acquisition of Road Builder (M) Holdings
Berhad in 2007, ostensibly to ramp up construction capabilities
and vie for international projects (refer to Chapter 9). Road Builder
199
200
There was a changing of the guard at the top since the merger meant there were now two
leaders. The issue was resolved with the promotion of IJM Properties managing director Teh
Kean Ming as deputy group managing director of IJM following the retirement of incumbent
Goh Chye Koon. RB Lands head Soam Heng Choon, an industry hand, became the first
managing director of the newly enlarged IJM Land.
It was a good fit, says Soam of the merger. Both companies were focused on property
development in high-growth urban centres but in different geographies. IJM Properties has a
strong presence in the Klang Valley, Penang, Johor and Sabah while RB Land is well known in
the Klang Valley as well as Negeri Sembilan, Melaka, Johor and Sarawak. Together, we pretty
much have the entire country covered except for the East Coast of the Peninsular.
The merger boosted the bottom line, and IJM Land registered bumper revenues RM0.67
billion in 2009 that grew to RM1.10 billion in 2010. Soam says, We are not only about driving
sales but also about cash flow management and cost control. As a listed company, we keep a
close watch on costs and performance. Business magazine The Edge Weekly ranked IJM Land
as No. 3 in terms of market capitalisation in 2012.
The Ampersand in KLCC is a low rise luxury condominium tucked away on a stylishly landscaped two acre block in the heart of bustling Kuala Lumpur.
201
Two upscale condominiums by the sea, a part of IJMs development The Light
in Penang. Light Linear (top) consists of two 17-storey condominium blocks
while Light Point (above) consists of 88 units in a 28-storey tower block on a
2.87 acre site.
Moving forward: An
artist impression of
Rimbayu linear-park in
Bandar Rimbayu that is
being developed by
IJM Land.
15
INDUSTRY
Manufacturing a Stronger Base
JMs track record for competitive costing, quality and timely delivery owes
in no small measure to the fact that it has its own in-house building materials
operations. What began as an in-house operation grew with the acquisition of
control of supply and quality. In time, the initial objective of serving in-house
needs evolved into one of supplying the open market to achieve economies
of scale. The business blossomed into an attractive revenue for the group,
The prime mover of the division was wholly owned subsidiary Malaysian Rock Products
Sdn Bhd (MRP), a granite quarry operator with a lineage that dates back to 1962. It became
the launching pad for IJMs expansion into quarry products such as aggregates, pre-mix and
ready mixed concrete, the bread and butter of the housing and building industry. MRP went
on a quarry buying trail, and by 1993, it had profitable quarrying operations in strategic
locations in the Klang Valley, Johor and Negeri Sembilan. Emboldened by success, it even
ventured into contract coal mining in Sarawak, but retreated quickly to concentrate on what
it knew best. Throughout its history, MRP became the behind-the-scenes pillar of support
providing a stable supply of granite and industrial-use stones for IJMs construction and
property divisions.
Another subsidiary, Kuang Rock Products Sdn Bhd (KRP), operating in Klang Valley,
together with MRP, gave IJM market leadership in quarrying. KRP has the distinction of
being one of the first quarry operators in Malaysia to be awarded the ISO 9002 certificate
for quality management. The aggregates of both subsidiaries were consistent top sellers in
this market segment.
Another manufacturing company, Torsco Sdn Bhd, began to outshine MRP. The 90%owned steel fabricator was acquired in 1989, when steel began to emerge as the building
he Hume Connection
207
IJMs quarries produce more than seven million tons of granite and industrialuse stones annually.
material of choice for several mega projects such as the Commonwealth Games Village
and KL International Airport. It also had a strong international clientele for its fabrication
services. The remaining 10% was held by managing director, Loo Ah Hooi. Torsco delivered
one sterling performance after another prompting IJM to prepare it for public listing on the
buoyant Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) to gain access to cheaper capital market funds
for expansion. Alas, listing hopes were crushed when the Asian Financial Crisis decimated the
stock market and serious money fled. The Torsco listing was aborted in 1998. Torscos shine
also began to fade when licensing realities of the oil and gas sector, an important addressable
Source: The Star, 16 October 1998
market for the company, began to relegate it to subcontractor status with a
consequent squeeze on profit margins.
Instead, associate company Industrial Concrete Products (ICP) stole
the march when it pipped Torsco at the finishing line to become IJMs first
manufacturing-based public listed company. On 9 December 1996, ICP
became a listed entity on the KLSE; it was an associate company of IJM,
which had a 20% equity interest, with the rest of the shareholdings held by
Jurutama founders, Hume Industries and the public.
The post 1997 Asian Financial Crisis was a time for consolidation at
IJM following the collapse of the construction industry. Money was scarce,
domestic demand for building materials plunged and the manufacturing
& quarrying division was in the red in 1998, a first for an IJM division.
Reprieve came following the devaluation of the ringgit when the Malaysian
government pegged the ringgit to the US dollar to heal the economy. Export
At its peak, IJMs steel fabrication subsidiary Torsco had two
markets revived the division, which also instituted measures for better
state-of-the-art plants in Ipoh and Lumut to fabricate large
capacity utilisation and debt collection. The result was a leaner and more
container cranes and pressure vessels, heat-transfer and
hydroelectric equipment for local and international clients.
competitive division, which accelerated its overseas thrust.
206
208
209
When Malaysia was hit by a recession for the first time
in 1985, I felt like it was the end of the world. I was then a young
engineer, and my sales manager told me that there was no future
in Malaysia and migrated to Australia. I was taken aback. When the
recession blew over, and good times came I realised how wrong my
ex-boss was. When the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis occurred, it was
difficult, but I was older and wiser and knew that the turnaround
would be upon us again.
ICP traces its beginnings to the Prai Power Station Phase III project (April
1976 to May 1977), where it acquired experience in the pre-tensioned spun
concrete pile technology.
ICP piles were used in Berths 11 and 12 of Port of Tanjung Pelepas in Iskandar Malaysia.
210
By the time IJM was formed in 1983, ICP had a strong order book and making super
profits, according to the financial controller of the time, Krishnan Tan. The low valuation of
ICP during the Jurutama-IGB merger generated some unhappiness, resulting in IGB owning
only the 20% held by Jurutama being transferred to the merged entity. The remaining 80%
interest remained with Jurutama founders, who did not relinquish their individual interests.
ICP continued to make waves in the market, promoting the use of PSC piles. It obtained
ISO Quality Management System accreditation in 1992, ahead of the government call making
it conditional for suppliers. To meet Singapore market requirements, ICP ensured its concrete
batching operations met the compliance criteria of the EN206 European Standards. While it
failed to make headway in Europe, PSC piles gained market acceptance in the more lucrative
emerging markets that had bigger infrastructure budgets.
In 1996, the profitable ICP was listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange under the
Industrial counter, one of few manufacturing companies to do so.
1st ISO certificate received from
SIRIM in 1992
PSC piles account for about 60% of the precast concrete piles business, and ICP controls 80%
of this market, says Harry Khor Kiem Teoh who took over the reins of ICP from Lim in 2007.
Many competitors had faded away from the marketplace resulting in very few spun pile
players. This also goes to show that ICP is a competitive and efficient operator. This is a highly
technical business that needs one to keep up with new technologies. That is our strength. Our
sales come mainly from external customers; in-house sale to IJM is about 5% of total volume.
Hollow, lighter, faster, more durable and easier to handle than
conventional piles due to pre-stressing, PSC piles are favoured in
the construction of ports, marinas, bridges, highways, railways and
airports They are also competitively priced and the installation
process needs lighter equipment; there is also less noise and
vibration. With its long and credible history in Malaysia, PSC
piles have become the preferred choice of customers for high
rise buildings, marine structures, railway, bridge and other
infrastructure projects. ICPs biggest export market is Singapore.
It also succeeded in exporting piles to Canada and the USA, where
the piles have been used in marinas in the Gulf of Mexico, around
Pensacola, New Orleans and Mobile. Modest sales have also been
made to Brunei, Vietnam, Yemen and Myanmar.
Today, the ICP Groups best seller is pre-tensioned spun piles,
which the market refers to as ICP piles. Our brand has become
the generic name, just like Colgate is to toothpaste, says Khor.
Once a single product company, the ICP Group now has four
distinct products, each has its own market appeal. PSC piles
211
One of the industry divisions overseas ventures: a ready mixed plant in Islamabad, Pakistan.
212
Bangalore, Chennai and Mumbai. In 2011, it added a maiden quarry in Hyderabad for the open
market there as well as to support IJMs construction activities on the subcontinent.
The group made its debut in Pakistan in 2008, with a ready mixed plant in Islamabad,
described in the IJM Annual Report 2008 as the jewel among our ready mixed plants that
generated a pre-tax profit of RM4.05 million on a turnover of RM29.90 million. Buoyed by
this result, ICP invested in a second plant in Karachi the following year. Unfortunately, the
early gains were negated by political instability and the credit crunch that took the world by
surprise in 2008.
The 2008 global economic meltdown caused much hardship, and IJM profits slumped
from the downturn in overseas operations, notably in India. However, in this gloomy
environment, the industry division delivered its best ever performance. Turnover crossed
the RM1 billion mark in 2009, and recorded a profit before tax of RM170 million, a rise of
44% from the previous year, says Khor. ICP, Durabon and Malaysian Rock Products posted
record results due to better product pricing, strong demand from large scale construction
projects and improved overseas contributions. The market was down, but we were
213
214
A 1,000mm diameter
ICP pile being driven
at the Second Penang
Bridge project.
215
16
PLANTATIONS
Vive la Diffrence
60,000 hectares of plantation land. Less than half of this acreage consists of
11 estates in Sabah, Malaysia, The remaining half sprawls over eight estates
According to the 2012 IJM Plantations Annual Report, plantations in Sabah enjoy a favourable
maturity profile, with 85% or about 21,500 hectares planted with palms classified as young
or of prime age (between 4-20 years). Still, the limited planted area of its Sabah plantations
was cause for concern, and prompted IJM to seek out new land banks to sustain the growth
of its plantation division. Such land is scarce in Sabah, and IJM then turned its attention to
Indonesia, which since 2006 had overtaken Malaysia as the worlds largest producer of crude
palm oil since 2006. Almost six times the size of Malaysia, it has vast tracts of land ideal for
the crop. Another push factor to Indonesia was plantation labour. IJM had always depended
on Indonesian migrant labour as plantation workers in Sabah. With accelerated oil palm
cultivation in Indonesia, experienced labourers chose to remain behind, enticed by better
salaries and, better still the advantage of living with their families, and not a life of isolation,
cut off from loved ones when working in Malaysia.
IJM succeeded in acquiring land in Bulungan and Kutai Timur in East Kalimantan and
Lampung in Sumatra, and embarked on a programme of aggressive planting. By the end of
2012, it had planted more than 27,000 hectares overtaking Sabahs total planted area of 25,441
hectares. It took IJM five years to accomplish in Indonesia what took about 20 years in Sabah.
Using a combination of experience, expertise and R&D, IJM succeeded in fast-tracking its
plantation interests in Indonesia. In contrast, it had no experience, no expertise and no R&D
support when it entered the plantation industry in Malaysia, where it began from ground zero.
218
ist of Firsts
According to IJMPs longest serving staff Thomas Kunjumman, hired as an assistant manager in 1986 and currently plantation controller.
First bungalow: It was built in three days in
1987 for Vela, the first manager, using remnant
logged timber left behind in the estate. There
was a temporary sawmill operated by building
contractor Ng Ba Ba who was employed for
all housing. The bungalow also had rooms for
visitors and meetings. It is currently occupied
by Thomas.
First nursery: Started in 1986 by contractor
Agriculture Incorporated Development (AID)
Sdn Bhd
The move into oil palm agriculture began as an adventure in itself because it was totally
unrelated to IJMs principal activity of construction. The board was divided, but supported
the management decision given the latters history of calculated risk management for every
new experiment. In the managements estimation, IJM needed a business with a different
boom-bust cycle from the construction and building industry. IJM pioneer Ong Yeng Tian,
acknowledged as the director who alerted the first IJM board to consider entering the
plantation business, says, Palm oil has been dubbed the golden crop. The world population
was growing and so too was the standard of living. In good times or bad, food is a basic necessity.
I was keen for IJM to enter plantations because there will be a continuous growing demand
for edible oil and it would not be subjected to the same economic cycles as construction. I
think those of us who favoured entering the plantation business have been proven right time
and again in the past few recessions.
Indeed, the IJMs plantation division lifted the groups financial performance with its
stellar performance in the aftermath of the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. It did so again when
the 2008 global economic eroded group profit margins.
Sabah is the last frontier of plantation agriculture. Ong recalls, When IJM Plantations Sdn
Bhd was formed, I was appointed as the director in charge of the subsidiary, to nurture the
fledgling company. I was assisted by Thye Fook Keong,
who was my alternate director in the subsidiary. We
had no experience, and recruited plantation expert KP
Lim as a consultant and advisor and Velayuthan Tan as
the project manager. I credit them for the good work
they put in making our first plantation a success.
When IJM braved into this unchartered territory
in 1985, it was watched with amusement by some
quarters. When I arrived to start work as a manager
in our first estate, the timber guys laughed, recalls
Velayuthan Tan. The Sandakan region is the stronghold
of the timber industry and bred many timber tycoons.
A Boustead visiting agent wished him a cautionary,
Good luck to you! because the land was considered a
goner by locals and the industry.
The strapping 31-year old Velayuthan, known as
Vela, was determined to have the last laugh. In the
pioneering spirit of frontiersmen, he set out to convert
the desolate 10,000-acre abandoned cocoa plantation
and degraded forest into a successful business for IJM
that had appointed him as its first estate manager. He
started as a one-man show at the estate belonging to
Desa Talisai Sdn Bhd (DTSB), a 50:50 joint venture
The abandoned cocoa plantation in Desa Talisai that was transformed into a
profitable oil palm plantation, now into the second planting cycle.
between IJM and Koperasi Pembangunan Desa in
219
1985
2013
220
221
Superior quality oil palm DxP seeds developed by IJMs research centre.
222
Planting occurred in four phases, with the first 2,000 acres completed in 1987. Another
2,000 acres was planted by 1988 and 4,000 in 1989-90; by 1991, planting on the 10,000- acre
Desa Talisai plantation was completed. Once planting was done, we devote ourselves to
rigorous maintenance.
At the end of Phase 2, I remember a visit by Sabah chief minister Joseph Pairin Kitigan,
accompanied by officers from our joint venture partner KPD. They were shown around by DTSB
chairman, the late Felix Golingi, who challenged the visitors with: If you see a blade of lalang
in our plantation, we will give RM10 per blade. We had planted 4,000 acres then, and it reflected
the confidence the chairman had in IJM. We were known to be sticklers for thoroughness.
1990: Sabah chief minister Joseph Pairin Kitigan
Phase 2 of the planting matured in 24 months and delivered a record yield of 6.25 tons per
(far left) pays a visit to Desa Talisai estate.
acre in the first year of harvesting, something few in the industry had achieved. Says Vela,
Standard maturity then was 36 months after planting, but 24 months is do-able. It was a
source of pride for IJM since it had turned a wasteland into a profitable plantation. Detractors
were silenced.
1992 was a watershed year. The plantation division delivered its maiden profit, five
years after the first planting, considered an accomplishment in the industry. Since then,
the division has never been in the red. That year, DTSB invested in a palm oil mill in the
estate to serve in-house needs and external customers. The groups plantation land bank
was expanded with the acquisition of Sijas Plantations Sdn Bhd that owned 1,011 hectares of
land near Desa Talisai estate.
Over the next few years, IJM aggressively expanded its acreage, and its workforce grew in
tandem.
By 1996, it had more than 24,000 acres, mainly in the Sandakan region, and a workforce
During floods, this innovative cable system is used
in excess of 1,000. The performance of upstream operations hinges largely on the price of
to transfer fresh fruit bunches from the fields to a
collection point across the river.
crude palm oil over which IJM has no control since it is determined by market forces. On
its part, IJM pursued a strategy of high yields to
enjoy good margins when CPO prices were high,
and still deliver profits when CPO prices were
down. For its milling business, the focus was on
maximum extraction, which earned the division
the PORLA Certificate of Merit for achieving
excellent rates of extraction at the Desa Talisai
palm oil mill in 1995 and 1997, a benchmark of
milling efficiency in Sabah.
The rigorous attention to high yields and
productivity resulted in record profits in 1997,
the year the Asian Financial Crisis brought the
construction industry down on its knees. The
plantation division rallied to become the highest
pre-tax contributor in 1997 and again in 1998
riding on the back of high CPO prices and the
In the remote Sugut region, landing crafts ply the river, transporting plantation supplies and
devalued ringgit. If anything, this performance
palm produce.
223
The sizeable expansion into
Indonesia and replanting programme in
Sabah are part of our strategy for longer
term growth and continuity of the business.
Expansion into Indonesia has progressed
very well, and within five years we have
more than doubled our planted area. We
have the first palm oil mill operating and
constructing a second one. Significant
plantation housing and infrastructure have
also been established. There are more than
4,000 people working for us.
Yields from the Indonesia palms are expected to be higher than those in Sabah
because of the availability of labour, the hands-on approach of experienced
IJM staff who are directly supervising the establishment of new estates, and
usage of IJMs in-house R&D planting materials. In 2012, the first palm oil mill
began operations. IJM is expected to realise significant contributions from its
Indonesia operations from 2015.
226
PLANTATION OPERATIONS
PLANTATION
Malaysia
1 Minat Teguh Estate
2 Sijas Estate
3 Desa Talisai South Estate
4 Desa Talisai North Estate
5 Meliau Estate
6 Sungai Sabang Estate
7 Berakan Maju Estate
8 Excellent Challenger I Estate
9 Excellent Challenger II Estate
10 Rakanan Jaya South Estate
11 Rakanan Jaya North Estate
PROCESSING
1 IJMEO Kernel Crushing Plant
2 Minat Teguh Palm Oil Mill
3 Desa Talisai Palm Oil Mill
4 Sabang Palm Oil Mill I
5 Sabang Palm Oil Mill II
6 IPS Palm Oil Mill
Indonesia
12 Sajau Estate
13 Binai Estate
14 Pertama Estate
15 Belidan Estate
16 Manubar Estate
17 Kaliorang Estate
18 Mengenai Estate
19 Alumga Estate
11
5 10
9 8 7
4 3
6
Kota Kinabalu
Beluran
Telupid
2
4 3 3
1
1
2 1
SABAH
Sandakan
Lahad Datu
Tawau
SERVICES
1 Wisma IJM Plantations
2 Quality, Training and
Research Centre
3 Sugut Training Centre
Tarakan
Tanjung Selor
12
13
EAST
KALIMANTAN
Sangatta
Palembang
19
SUMATRA
Lampung
Samarinda
17
18
14 15
16
227
228
To date, only about 10% of the palm is being
commercially utilised, mainly for crude palm oil and crude
palm kernel oil. There is still plenty of value left in the rest
of the 90% biomass.
Joseph Tek Choon Yee,
CEO / managing director of IJM Plantations Berhad
Recycled bridge
IJM built a Bailey bridge across the Sugut River to reduce
travelling time and distances for crop delivery to the mill
between North and South regions of the six estates in the
area Excellent Challenger 1, Excellent Challenger 2, Rakan
Jaya North, Rakan Jaya South, Sabang and Berchan Maju.
The portable, pre-fabricated truss bridge is reportedly
built using metal from four dismantled Bailey bridges from
Scandinavia.
Teks mission is to establish IJM Plantations as a high yield operation. He uses the analogy of
a three-legged stool of interdependence to elaborate this. The three legs are the estates, mills
and service providers. He sought to maximise synergies between well-managed estates and
well-operated mills to achieve maximum output of fresh fruit bunches, crude palm oil and palm
kernel. The service providers, primarily research, was the third leg of the stool, that provided
essential support to all other levels to achieve high yield at every turn. In Teks mind, estates and
mills are the production houses and breadwinners, while the service providers continuously
render support. Tek started exploring and introducing mechanisation. The focus now is on
innovation. We will pursue with mechanisation wherever we can, he says.
To engender the staff and management loyalty and support, Tek
passionately promotes the 5Cs of operational excellence: Crop and oil
quality, Condition of fields and mills, Cost-effectiveness of operations,
Controls and compliance, and Corporate Social Responsibility. Like Vela,
he personally engages with staff to embed 5Cs into the IJM Plantations
It is estimated that for every RM1 earned in the oil palm estate,
work culture, making regular visits to meet employees in the 11 estates
40% is deducted for a variety of state and government tariffs:
in the Sandakan and Sugut regions, and the four mills (each region had
Corporate tax is 25%
two mills).
Sabah sales tax is 7.5%
Profitability is largely dependent on the price and volume of CPO
Windfall Tax is 7.5% for a CPO price that is above the
threshold of RM3,000 /ton
produced, and productivity is measured by oil yield derived from fresh
Palm oil cess of RM15/ton for CPO and kernel oil that is
fruit bunches (FFB) from the estates and oil extraction achieved by the
payable to the Malaysian Palm Oil Board
mills. IJM had achieved an oil yield extraction rate that exceeds the industry
Industry players view it as the heaviest taxation structure
norm. The Malaysian average is about 4 mt/hectare, while the IJM average
for any industry in Malaysia, a situation aggravated when
is 5 mt/hectare. Set against the weighted palm age profile of around 12 to 14
competing with farmers in USA and Europe who are highly
years old, in Teks first year, oil yield was 5.1 mt in 2011, and in 2012, it rose to
subsidised. It is not a level playing field for commercial
commodity cultivation in Malaysia, say sources.
5.4 mt. and in 2013, it hit 5.5 mt. Teks aspiration is to hit six tons.
IJM invests in research & development to improve yield and agronomy practices.
229
230
Desa Talisai Mill, first mill in the first estate, where palm oil is extracted from fresh fruit bunches.
He also concentrates on expanding the oil palm breeding programme and upgrading
the research facility, one of few owned by a mid-size planter in Malaysia. The oil palm seed
production unit in QTRC, established in collaboration with the Malaysian Palm Oil Board,
was accredited with the SIRIM MS157:2005 certification. The unit selects parental mother and
father palms from genetic blocks for certification by SIRIM and subsequent commercial oil
palm seed production. In the early days, IJM used to source its commercial oil palm planting
materials from other research stations. Today, it has its own seed production unit, which sent
consignments of germinated seeds for planting in its Indonesian estates.
Based in Sijas Estate, Sandakan, QTRC has a sub-station in Sugut. Apart from seed
breeding and production, it also provides agronomic and technical advisory services to
the estates, from fertiliser recommendations to pest management. QTRC technical staff
regularly conduct quality checks on crops received
in the palm oil mills, estate field audits, pest and
disease census and soil-foliar sampling for analysis.
They also train staff and executives on estate
Posters of IJM Plantations holistic
approach based on the tagline Nurturing
management and agronomy.
Saved from extinction: the ancient seraya is a part of 100 Acre Wood, a conservation area in
Sugut, Sabah.
234
hange of Focus
R
Cadet planters from Malaysia and Indonesia attend on-the-job training as
well as classroom lessons.
235
oad to Rugby
in its cultivated best as well as in its pristine state. They are seduced
by the greenery that surrounds them and regular regimen of estate
life, akin to regular sports training. Those who work in Sugut, which is
more isolated than the estates in Sandakan, have little communication
with the outside world. Here, mobile phone usage is a balancing act
on a wobbly lookout ladder, and Internet access is poor. The trappings
of modern youth are absent, but these young men have made a
conscientious decision to choose a less complicated life, away from
the pressures and impositions of corporate life. In the mould of estate
men of yore, they are weekend husbands, leaning on their wives to
raise their children single-handed.
There is also a discernible shift in the employment profile of
Indonesians on IJMPs payroll. It is no longer restricted to labourers
but now includes expatriate planters, hand-picked from Indonesian
universities to attend IJMPs cadetship programme at the QTRC and
training centre in Sugut, accommodated in a dormitory in the remote
100 Acre Wood, where they are given a foretaste of estate life before
assuming executive duties in IJMPs Indonesian estates.
Plantation manager Murugan Munusamy sums up the dilemma
estate men frequently face. I joined IJM in 1988 and worked in estates,
both in Sandakan and Sugut. My family lived with me until the children
started school, and we were together on weekends and holidays.
My children have grown up and want me to retire and join them in
Peninsular Malaysia. I am torn because I have grown to love life in
Sabah, where I own a house in the remote town of Meliau, surrounded
by greenery, just like in an estate.
Estate life is relatively free of crime, unlike city life. When I read
the newspapers, I become alarmed at the killing, robberies and
shooting occurring in the city. It is peaceful in the estate, with plenty
of fresh air, the sound of birds chirping and time for yourself. Most of
us rise with the sun for the 5.30 am muster, and there is a lot of walking
in the estate. Daily life is a routine, but it calls for attention to detail.
There are a lot of things you can learn from estate life. When
clearing the jungle for planting in Sugut, I began to find out how to
build roads, terrace the land, and identify good wood when felling logs
for housing. Along the way, I discovered things I never knew I could do.
There are sacrifices such as limited family time, and little contact
with the outside world. In emergencies, we can use the telephone in
the managers office. Cut off, estate staff become a close-knit family,
who look out for each other. It is the kind of workplace that is hard to
find nowadays.
17
Western Access
Tollway, Buenos
Aires, Argentina
main toll plaza at
Ituzaingo
INFRASTRUCTURE
Assets that can be Monetised
be monetised. The division posted its first substantial profit in 1997, and the
profit trend continued. The initial contributions could not have come at a
better time. The group was recovering from the after effects of the 1997 Asian
Financial Crisis that took its toll on the construction, property and industry
divisions. Jobs were scarce, revenues were down and debt collection was a
IJMs international thrust began very early in its history, adopted to counter the negative
impact of the 1985 global economic recession that ravaged Malaysia. The group was then
two years old, and preparing to list on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange to fund expansion
plans. There was a lack of liquidity and a lack of jobs in Malaysia. In the face of hardship
in the home market, the founding partners of IJM opted to take its construction business
overseas. They were familiar with developed economies, and the group strategy of
geographical diversification took IJM to Australia, United Kingdom, the USA, Singapore and
Hong Kong. A few jobs gave some relief to the construction division, but by and large, IJM
made headway more as an investor rather than a contractor, especially in the West they
needed money, not expertise.
A discernible shift occurred in the 1990s, when prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad
vigorously promoted South-South cooperation, encouraging Malaysian companies to enter
developing countries. IJM heeded the call, and ventured into emerging markets such as China,
Vietnam, Namibia, Chile, and Argentina. There were hits and misses, with the biggest strides
made in China, Vietnam and Argentina.
On an investment mode, IJM entered the China market when few international players did.
The first major infrastructure investment occurred in 1994, when IJM took up a 37.5% equity
interest in the Wuxi Nenda Co-Generation Company Ltd that had a 50 year concession to build,
operate and maintain a co-generation plant in the County of Wuxi in the Jiangsu Province of
China. In early 1996, IJM took up a 25.5% stake in the Zhongma Yangzhong Changjiang Bridge
Corporation Limited that had the concession for toll collection, management, operation and
maintenance of Yangzhong Changjiang Bridge for a period of 25 years. IJM Annual Report 1996
states: Toll collections on the bridge had commenced and toll income to the present day has
surpassed expectations.
Also in 1996, IJM became a shareholder of Guangdong Province Expressway Development
Co Ltd, when it took up a 20% equity interest in the company that was a prospective
candidate to be listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. The Guangdong Province Expressway
Development Company is a BuildOperate-Transfer concessionaire that
owned two tolled expressways, one
operating and the other to be built, and
a bridge.
IJM sold these assets in the aftermath
of the Asian Financial Crisis to reduce
foreign currency debt, and later to fund
expansion plans. IJMs third managing
director, Krishnan Tan, who was in
the pioneering team spearheading
international investments, explains,
Chinese concessions needed continuous
reinvestment due to strong growth
and the funding structure of these
companies was based on shareholder
contributions. There was no bank debt,
and this imposed a burden on our own
financial resources since our funding strategy to finance investments was based on a 70:30
ratio of non recourse debt to equity, with IJM relying on the debt market to also fund its
30% equity. The infrastructure debt market in China then was almost non-existent and it
was hard to raise funds externally. Due to this and the pressures of the Asian Financial Crisis,
we decided to exit China, and concentrate in the rising India, where the capital market was
mature by comparison. Proceeds from our Chinese investments were used to pre-pay foreign
borrowings as well as to plough into future investments, especially in India.
IJM cashed out its 37.5% equity in Wuxi Co-Generation Plant in 1998 and 25.5% equity in
Yangzhong Changjiang Bridge in 2006. The Guangdong Province Expressway Development
Ltd shareholding was sold in stages, and IJM continued to rake in attractive dividends from
the investment over the next few years. In 2001, it cashed out 12.5% of its equity, and the
remaining equity was eventually sold in 2008, marking IJMs departure from China. The
Guangdong Expressway Development Ltd investment disposal resulted in a profit of over
241
Western Access Tollway in Buenos Aires, another infrastructure investment that brought respite during hard times. Still in the IJM stable, it has been a steady
revenue contributor.
RM240 million, and was described by second managing director Goh Chye
Keat as the most profitable international venture in IJM history. IJM had
entered China early and exited when the field was getting crowded. It
was a calculated risk that had served the company well.
IJM entered Argentina about the same time as China and the route
was somewhat similar. In 1996, IJM took up 24.5% equity in Grupo
Concessionario del Oeste SA (GCO) that had the concession to build, own
and operate 55.45 kilometres of the Western Access Tollway in Buenos
Aires. When GCO was en-route to public listing in 1998, IJM had placed
5.96 million shares for initial public offering in July 1999. The USD11.8
million encashment became GCOs maiden profit contribution of RM14.5
million to the group.
The ability to monetise infrastructure investments represents a major catalyst for the
growth of this privatisation model. Tan says, In the early years of privatisation, companies
could get in but had difficulty cashing out of BOT concessions. Privatised infrastructure
incurred a heavy debt burden during construction, and the gestation period, especially for
tollways, was often long. The plus side of this equation is that the concession companys debt
was often non recourse, with little or no risk involved to shareholders beyond their equity
investment. The down side was that there was no flexibility the owners of the concession
240
242
243
time. Construction, financing and other related costs are recovered during operations, with
charges for usage. Since BOT involve strategic public assets built for the benefit of the public,
concessionaires seldom have the liberty to set the tariff this falls within the jurisdiction of
the government, the ultimate owner of the infrastructure. Toll and utility charges are political
hot potatoes, and given their universal usage can become electoral issues when not properly
managed. As such, governments tend to tread on eggshells when determining tariffs for these
public amenities.
One thing is clear, the privatisation of infrastructure is here to stay, especially in emerging
economies where they account for an increasing proportion of development expenditure.
IJM read the cards well, and bid for Build-Operate-Transfer concessions, both in Malaysia
and overseas. Its first award was a 16-year concession in 1994 for the design, construction,
financing and management of the Komplex Kementerian Kerja Raya Public Works Building
Complex, the first privatised government building in the country. The concession was a
success and has ended, and the building was transferred back to the government in 2012.
Regrettably, IJM failed in its bids for big ticket infrastructure concessions in Malaysia,
frequently selectively awarded to bumiputera companies to increase their participation in
the economy and others. Disappointed for not making much headway in Malaysia, it went
on an acquisitions trail for BOT investments overseas. Apart
from China and Argentina, it met with a measure of success in
Vietnam and India.
In 1996, IJM entered Vietnam, by taking up a 36.0% equity
interest in a BOT water project in Ho Chi Minh City through the
Toll roads operate on the principle of choice they are
Binh An Water Corporation Limited. In 1997, IJM made its debut
the alternative to toll-free roads. Frequently, toll-free roads are
in India, as an investor and contractor in the 60:40 joint venture
older, single lane roads that are congested. Road users have the
partnership in Gautami Power Limited that had the concession to
option of paying tolls for convenience and time savings.
operate a 360 MW power plant in the state of Andra Pradesh. It
Neoh Soon Hiong, director of Besraya and New Pantai Expressway
took some time to take off, giving IJM first hand experience of the
rocky road to privatisation in the newly liberalised India.
244
The company was not discouraged because it saw possibilities in India as it had done
earlier in China. In 2001, IJM won its first BOT highway project in India, when it invested in
31.9% in Swarna Tollway Pte Ltd, which was awarded a 30-year concession for two highways
in Andra Pradesh. This investment heralded IJMs entry as a pioneering toll road investorcontractor in India, for the construction of the NH5 and NH9, a total of 156 km. Construction
was completed by 2003, positioning IJM
as a builder of quality infrastructure,
completed on time and within budget.
Tolling of the highways began in 2004.
Infrastructure (toll) general manager
James Wong Tet Foh says, IJMs
strength was that it is a construction
supermarket that could control the
entire building chain. We also had
strong backing from banks and internal
reserves. This removed construction
risks that frequently delay the take-off
of toll highways. After construction, the
infrastructure becomes an asset for us
to manage. And we had the professional
expertise for toll operations.
The first decade of 2000 was the
turning point for the infrastructure division. It started on a high, with IJM gaining ground as
a sought-after BOT concessionaire in India, and the company quickly expanded its footprint
across the subcontinent. By 2002, it had two 100% owned toll highway projects under its
belt the Rewa-Jaisinghnagar-Shahdol-Amarkantak Road and the Satna-Maihar-Parasi
More-Umaria toll highways, both in Madya Pradesh. In his Review of Operations, Annual
Report 2002, group managing director Krishnan Tan stated: It is envisaged that the heavy
spending on infrastructural development in India, particularly on roads, would provide a
good opportunity to expand our activities and anchor our presence in this vast country.
Three other BOT concessions followed the wholly owned Jaipur Mahua Tollway, 50%
owned Trichy Tollway and 33%-owned Second Vivekananda Bridge Tollway Company. By
2007, IJM had five toll highways and one power plant in India.
As expected, revenues took time to trickle in and the division slipped into the red between
2004/5 and 2007. The groups India hand, Tan, explains: In India, we started from scratch,
using foreign borrowings to finance our equity interest while construction was funded by non
recourse local borrowings, unlike in the past when we used internal funds. It takes time to see
returns on a toll road investment. As a guide, privatised highways see the lowest revenue and
highest debt cost at the start of the concession period. Profitability generally sets in about five
to seven years after opening for tolling. Toll highways in India are relatively new and incur
higher interest rates compared to Malaysia, and public acceptance also takes longer.
In his Review of Operations in the 2007 Annual Report, Tan sums up the anticipated
poor performance of the infrastructure division, attributing it to interest cost incurred on
offshore borrowings to finance the groups equity investments in toll concessions in India,
some of which were still under construction and low initial traffic volume in the groups
operating concessions. These concessions are currently in their third year of operations and
with improving traffic volumes and mandatory toll rate increases, better performance levels
are expected from them in the coming years.
Still, India was not off the IJM radar. In 2008, the group invested in another highway, the
50%-owned Chilkaluripet-Vijayawada Tollway for 82 kilometres in Andra Pradesh. Meanwhile,
an opportunity arose to encash one of its investments following its completion. IJM sold its
stake in the Second Vivekananda Bridge in Kolkata for a profit of RM65 million. It was in the
second year of operations and anticipated to make operating losses for the next 6 years. It
was a good sale that helped lift and expose the present value potential of the infrastructure
divisions assets.
The biggest shot in the arm for the division came with the strategic acquisition of Road
Builder (M) Holdings Berhad (RBH). After years of languishing in a BOT concession drought
in Malaysia, the division struck big in 2007, when it inherited four infrastructure assets that
forever changed the complexion of the infrastructure division, until then ruled by foreign
assets. With this inheritance, the infrastructure division bounced back with a vengeance to
post an impressive pre-tax profit of RM88.60 million in 2008.
All RBH assets were injected into the IJM Group and their financial performance reflected
in the 2008 accounts. The new additions two toll highways and two ports were potential
money spinners that gave the infrastructure division the big break it sorely needed. It
consisted of one profitable wholly owned highway the 16-km Besraya Highway that had a
245
248
37-year concession and was operating for 10 years. It came with almost no debt, says Tan. The
other was the 20-km New Pantai Expressway with a 35 year concession. It had been operating
for five years and the inflexion point had yet to be reached, according to Tan. Both highways
were located in the Klang Valley, where road users were accustomed to toll highways and
the prospects of growing traffic volume were promising. The Besraya alignment is currently
being extended to connect it to the Middle Ring Road at Pandan Indah, an extra 13 km, to
improve connectivity on the Eastern side of the Klang Valley.
Besraya and New Pantai Expressway director Neoh Soon Hiong, previously from Road
Builder, says that when IJM took over these tollways, both faced stiff competition from
alternative toll free roads, and traffic was below targeted projections. IJM proposed the
removal of the Salak South toll plaza and the Kampung Medan toll plaza for Besraya and New
Pantai Expressway. The abolition of tolls for local road users and reduction of toll charges for
long haul motorists accelerated traffic growth for both highways
and placed them on better financial footing.
The view that ports dont make money is wrong. The port
Neoh says, As paid alternatives to non-toll roads, toll highways
have to ensure that they are well maintained and user friendly.
business is a 24/7 industry. Those days, capital expenditure was
We have to ensure that they are safer and remain the more costhuge and it was borne by the government. The industry was heavily
effective and convenient choice at all times.
unionised, and processes took longer. When staff performed well,
Curiously, IJMs prolonged bad spell for domestic concessions
it was difficult to reward them because salaries were tied to the
had ended the previous year, before the entry of RBHs assets. In
government remuneration structure. Privatisation addressed these
its quest for infrastructure investments, IJM spotted a couple of
issues, and we can now literally run a tight ship and be profitable.
concession companies in distress in 2007. It took over the 50%
Profitability depends of capturing traffic plying this route; it is very
equity interest of the ailing shareholder of Lebuhraya Kajangmuch a volume game.
Seremban Sdn Bhd, which had the concession for the 48km new
highway linking Kajang to Seremban for a period of 33 years. IJMs
Wong Soon Fah, first managing director of IJM infrastructure division (ports)
construction division swung into action to complete building the
highway, previously mired in financial problems. In 2008, the
eponymous LEKAS commenced tolling.
Source: The Star, 10 December 2007
Similar circumstances led to another investment, this time
the financially-strapped West Coast Expressway concessionaire.
The 240-km expressway is the alternative to the popular and
increasingly congested North-South Highway. At the time
of writing, a new concession agreement for the West Coast
Expressway had been signed and construction had yet to
commence. When it does, it will be a boon to the construction
divisions order book. Contribution to the infrastructure divisions
profit centre will take some years. The West Coast Expressway
concession is for 50 years, with a conditional extension of another
10 years. This is a new generation agreement with an equitable
mechanism for upside sharing with the government.
249
IJM became a port operator in 2007, with the multipurpose Kuantan Port and the industrial
port of Kemaman, both located in the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. With this, IJM
Group enlarged its Malaysian footprint from Penang in the North to Johor in the south,
the East Coast, Sarawak and Sabah. The group now had a strategic presence in every key
development zone of Malaysia.
IJM was lucky to have picked up Kuantan Port at this juncture. The aging Kuantan
Port had taken centre-stage in the vigorous industrialisation of the East Coast economic
corridor, branded as East Coast Economic Region (ECER), which began in 2006.
Located at the edge of the Pacific Rim and within the ECER Special Economic Zone,
Kuantan Port is being envisioned by the government as the Gateway of the East, for
international trade with the markets of ASEAN and the Far East, particularly China,
which became Malaysias largest trading partner in 2011, with cargo volumes growing
Kuantan Ports second managing
exponentially since then. Kuantan Port offers the shortest, quickest and most direct route director Ho Phea Keat.
between Peninsular Malaysia and the ports of South China, compared to any other port
in Malaysia. It is also being positioned as transshipment centre for the redistribution of
manufactured goods, particularly in ASEAN, China, Japan and West Coast USA.
IJM is expanding Kuantan Port into a megaport, and embarked on the construction of a
Source: Nanyang Siang Pau, 6 February, 2013
new deep water terminal to accommodate panamax and super
panamax vessels. Cargo volumes are forecast to surge with
the rapid industrialisation of ECER and fast-growing bilateral
trade with China. In February 2013, IJM signed a Memorandum
of Understanding with the Guangxi Beibu International Port
Group (GBIPG) of China, which operates four ports in southwest
China, that will take up a 40% equity interest in the Kuantan
Port concession.
Kuantan Port has some 500 staff, many of them seasoned
players in the port industry. It is headed by managing director Ho
2013: IJMs managing director Teh Kean Ming exchanging documents with
Phea Keat who recalls the growth of Kuantan Port since it began
Ye Shixiang, president of Guangxi Beibu International Port Group, after the
MOU signing ceremony.
operations in 1984: It was a modest start, with cargo volumes of
250
less than one million tonnes per annum, says the port
veteran. Kuantan Port started by handling five types
of cargo latex, timber, iron ore, manganese and later
palm oil. When rubber and timber became sunset
industries in Malaysia, the port began to concentrate
on liquid chemicals, especially petrochemicals
following the oil & gas boom in Malaysia in the 1990s.
In 1998, Kuantan Port was privatised to Road
Builder Holdings Berhad. By then, several oil & gas
majors had established bases in the East Coast,
attracted by the availability of oil & gas, palm oil,
minerals and other raw materials. Land was, and still
is, relatively cheap here and there is a pool of skilled
labour. Our hinterland includes customers such as BHP
Amoco, BASF Petronas, MTBE, Eastman Chemicals.
Hazmat handling became Kuantan Ports niche, and we
gained international recognition for this.
The 2000s was a relatively quiet decade, and things started picking up
in 2010, when we noticed a sharp rise in exports to China, especially iron
ore. Since privatisation 12 years ago, Kuantan Port has expanded from the
original four wharves and two berths to a total of 20 wharves and seven
berths in 2010 to meet rising demand.
Port revenue comes from cargo handling (40%), ship revenue
piloting, dockage and port dues (35%), lease of land for industries
and support facilities (20%) and ancillary facilities fire-fighting,
An oil rig berthed at Kuantan Port, which is located in the oil, gas
and petrochemical belt of Peninsular Malaysia.
251
fork-lifting and security (5%). Revenues were steady for much of the 2000s until the
launch of ECER in 2006.
Today, Kuantan Port handles about 15 million tonnes of cargo annually. The industrialisation
of ECER represents the next boom for the port. In 2012, ECER exceeded its investment target
of RM10 billion, by recording RM12 billion investments that year. Many of them are for exportoriented industries, which require port facilities.
The prospects are bright for Kuantan megaport, which will become more containerbased when the expansion is completed in 2015, says Ho. It will then have the capacity to
handle cargo volumes of between 60-80 million tonnes per annum, and the new deep water
terminal will be able to accommodate panamax and super panamax vessels.
Since 2008, the infrastructure division has made respectable gains, and its contributions to
the groups coffers have helped offset shrinking profit margins suffered by the construction
division. In 2009, it delivered a PBT of RM27 million, 5% of the groups profits, and its
contribution climbed steeply to RM128 million (18% of Group PBT) in 2011 before slipping
to RM86 million (11% of group PBT) in 2012 due to the addition of new and immature Indian
concessions that were in the loss making stage. While the bulk of profits come from mature
Malaysian concessions, foreign assets in Argentina, Vietnam and India make regular, albeit
modest, contributions.
The biggest setback for foreign assets is US-denominated borrowings and foreign
exchange fluctuations that tend to devalue their contributions to the group from time to
time. However, over time, their impact has been positive. Still, IJM had made substantial
profits from BOT concessions, especially from construction, recurrent income and the
occasional disposal of assets.
252
Conclusion
JM began as a daring dream of a group of civil engineers who were ahead of their
time. The formative years were full of hardship, sacrifices, even despair. But these determined
men never gave up hope, and remained committed to realising their dream of building a
professional group of companies that were equals to well-capitalised foreign construction
players who had made inroads into Malaysias construction industry.
IJM now celebrates 30 years of a winning game, with a footprint that has grown across the
world. It has delivered one sterling performance after another, and gained recognition as a
reputable Malaysian brand with a string of awards. There have been setbacks and mistakes,
but they pale in the brightness of achievements.
The IJM of today owes much to its founders, who bequeathed upon the company the
fundamental principles of a sustainable business: the culture of good governance, quest for
excellence and the philosophy of a shared destiny.
For them, business must be conducted in a fair and ethical manner. Only then will the
company be there for the long haul. In their relationship with staff, suppliers, subcontractors
and other third parties they emphasised transparency, integrity and accountability. These
values have become embedded into the IJM work and business culture. Faithful adherence
to these practices have propelled the rise and rise of IJM, a company with the reputation for
taking the road not taken, emerging more refreshed and energised by the decision.
The founders were hands-on managers who led by example. They pursued excellence
so that IJM could stand out and be counted in the increasingly competitive and crowded
construction business. Excellence was more than systems and procedures. It was a state of
mind, and the culture of excellence has permeated across all levels of staff, and strengthened
the core of the company.
People will always remain the lifeline of IJM, and the founders in their wisdom practised
the concept of a shared destiny. It has a simple, potent message. It urges staff to remain
steadfast and committed to the company goals because when the company prospers, so
will they. And when the going gets tough, sacrifices will have to be made by everyone. IJM is
blessed that its workforce has risen to the many challenges thrown at it, and the company
emerged stronger each time.
Now, as IJM stands on the threshold of another new decade, a new generation of leaders
have embarked on their journey to drive the company forward. They have inherited a
company with good genes. It is also well-capitalised, and has an enviable track record and
strong order books. The prospects are bright, but nothing can be taken for granted. As with
any journey, there are likely be obstacles, sometimes beyond ones control. It is now the turn
of IJMs second generation to seek solutions. The baton has been passed. And the next leg of
the race is theirs to run.
253
256
INDEX
INDEX
A
Abdul Halim 6, 137, 141, 143, 159
Abdullah Ahmad Badawi 94, 167
Abu Dhabi 3, 97, 98, 167, 179
Adam Eleod 89
AEON Bandaraya Melaka 196
affordable 55, 56, 73, 96, 151, 181, 187, 189, 193, 201
affordable housing 55, 56, 73, 96, 151, 181, 187, 201
Africa 71, 73
agri-services 221
Ahmad Azizuddin 6, 24, 28, 47, 50, 82, 141, 142, 156
Alan Khoo Choom Kwong 221
Alor Setar 20, 23
Ampersand @ Kia Peng 201
Amsearch Report 224
Anand Sharma 128
Andra Pradesh 3, 90, 91, 92, 94, 95, 97, 190, 243,
244, 245
Andra Pradesh Housing Board 95, 97
annual dinner 112, 113
Annual Quality and Safety Award 166
Anthony Horden 51
APMC cement plant 20, 22
arboretum 233
Argentina 2, 71, 73, 76, 85, 88, 89, 90, 113, 118, 153,
238, 239, 241, 242, 243, 251
Asian Development Bank 35, 73
Asian Financial Crisis 47, 72, 75, 85, 88, 91, 99, 117,
123, 124, 164, 184, 206, 209, 219, 222, 239, 240
assets 21, 35, 37, 44, 61, 88, 94, 97, 98, 99, 104, 108,
109, 123, 126, 128, 187, 196, 205, 223, 239, 240, 242,
243, 245, 248, 251
Australia 3, 25, 36, 37, 48, 49, 50, 51, 69, 70, 75, 88,
190, 209, 235, 239
authorised capital 24, 27
Avillion Hotel 51, 190
Avillion Resort Hotel 176
cadetship 237
Cambodia 186, 215
Canada 210
Central Monitoring Station 246
centre of excellence 234
Changchun 99
Chay Kwok Thong 24, 39, 41, 49, 80, 82, 121, 146,
147, 156, 157, 168
Chee Wan Yee 82, 150, 151, 157, 168
Chennai 91, 94, 212
Chennai Bypass Highway 94
Chen Yu Land 47, 56
Chile 2, 71, 73, 239
China 3, 32, 36, 71, 73, 88, 89, 90, 91, 99, 107, 118, 128,
139, 151, 167, 201, 211, 213, 215, 239, 240, 241, 242,
243, 244, 249, 250, 251
Choo Choon Yeow 82, 121, 125, 146, 147, 157, 158, 168
Choong Chin Liang 12
Christopher Richard Donough 221
Chua Hock Chin 103, 105, 107
Chye Hin Construction 12, 40
Chye Hin 13
earnings 27, 67, 78, 83, 97, 104, 114, 123, 125, 127, 139,
174, 196
East Coast Economic Region 249
ECER 249, 250, 251
Economic Transformation Plan 98, 215
Economic Transformation Programme 117
Econstates 108, 109
education 9, 15, 69, 70, 81, 117, 137, 153, 170, 187, 235
ICP 21, 27, 37, 38, 53, 54, 67, 97, 98, 99, 115, 123, 128,
129, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215.
SeeIndustrial Concrete Products Sdn Bhd
IGB 13, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 38,
41, 44, 45, 47, 56, 80, 109, 121, 131, 132, 142, 155, 171,
188, 189, 191, 210
IJM-Degremont 47
IJM Engineering & Construction 24, 27, 45, 59, 142
IJMI 91, 92, 95, 96, 97, 98
IJM India Infrastructure Limited 91
IJM Land 36, 99, 108, 109, 116, 127, 139, 154, 155, 187,
191, 196, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202
IJMP 115, 218, 221, 223, 234, 235, 237
IJM Plantations 36, 98, 115, 123, 126, 129, 139, 197,
217, 219, 220, 221, 223, 224, 225, 226, 228, 229, 232,
234, 235
IJM Plantations Berhad 115, 123, 223, 228
IJM Properties 56, 116, 134, 135, 136, 186, 187, 188,
193, 197, 198, 199, 200
incentive 40, 48, 170
India 3, 71, 84, 89, 90, 91, 92, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 107,
112, 113, 116, 118, 124, 127, 128, 136, 139, 143, 148,
149, 153, 155, 167, 173, 174, 179, 190, 211, 212, 234,
240, 242, 243, 244, 245, 251
Indian partner 91
Indonesia 3, 85, 98, 128, 139, 143, 186, 215, 216, 217,
221, 224, 225, 226, 228, 234, 235
Industrial Concrete Products Berhad 115, 123, 208
Industrial Concrete Products Sdn Bhd 21, 27, 37,
53, 67, 207
infrastructure asset 128
infrastructure division 92, 113, 239, 242, 244, 245,
248, 251
257
insectarium 233
integrated pest management 233
integration 34, 35, 44, 53, 78, 109, 112, 114, 117, 126,
131, 136, 154, 155, 169
international ventures division 88, 239, 242
investment 15, 31, 41, 56, 58, 59, 71, 75, 78, 82, 83, 86,
87, 88, 89, 92, 98, 99, 104, 105, 107, 114, 126, 127,
130, 138, 186, 197, 223, 227, 239, 240, 241, 242, 244,
248, 251
Ipoh 12, 13, 19, 21, 23, 24, 26, 31, 37, 56, 65, 179, 206
Ipoh Garden Sdn Bhd 13
Ipoh Railway Station 179
IPS 225, 226
Iskandar Malaysia 104, 188, 208, 215
Islamabad 3, 211, 212
Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia extension 171
ISO 9002 75, 81, 82, 204, 205
258
Klang 14, 20, 21, 22, 42, 54, 59, 60, 65, 67, 69, 112, 117,
135, 174, 177, 189, 191, 193, 199, 200, 205, 211, 215,
220, 248
Klang Valley 20, 21, 42, 54, 59, 60, 67, 69, 112, 117,
135, 174, 189, 191, 193, 199, 200, 205, 220, 248
KL International Airport 63, 66, 72, 169, 206
KL Mass Rapid Transit 117
KLSE 72, 85, 86, 87, 99, 125, 167, 206
KL-Seremban Toll Expressway 47, 177
KL Stock Exchange 24, 27
Koay Poon Hock 168
Koh Boon Chor 5, 6, 10, 13, 24, 28, 35, 39, 40, 44, 45,
47, 48, 49, 78, 80, 121, 144, 145, 156, 157
Kolej Antarabangsa 69, 70
Kolkata 245
Komplex Kementerian Kerja Raya 243
Komtar 181, 185
Koon Yew Yin 6, 10, 12, 13, 14, 21, 24, 28, 35, 39, 40,
80, 121, 156, 157
Koperasi Pembangunan Desa 58, 219, 220
KPD 58, 59, 218, 220, 222
KP Lim 57, 59, 219, 220
Krishnan Tan 5, 6, 24, 30, 32, 35, 36, 38, 51, 58, 70,
82, 83, 85, 87, 89, 90, 91, 92, 97, 98, 99, 103, 104,
107, 109, 113, 117, 118, 120, 121, 125, 126, 127, 128,
129, 130, 136, 137, 140, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 153,
155, 172, 184, 185, 198, 199, 208, 210, 218, 223, 240,
244, 254
KRP 205
Kuala Lumpur 9, 11, 13, 14, 20, 21, 23, 47, 52, 56, 60,
63, 64, 65, 67, 68, 69, 71, 72, 85, 91, 99, 106, 112,
115, 117, 131, 133, 136, 164, 170, 175, 176, 178, 179,
181, 187, 189, 193, 200, 206, 209, 210, 212, 221, 223,
239, 245
Kuala Lumpur City Centre 170
Kuala Lumpur Monorail 179
Kuala Terengganu Water Supply Plant 22
Kuang Rock Products 205
Kuantan 105, 108, 129, 139, 242, 249, 250, 251
Kuantan Port 105, 108, 129, 139, 242, 249, 250, 251
Kuching 20, 65, 177
Kukatpally 96, 190
Kumpulan Europlus 118
Kumpulan Perangsang 121
Kunjumman Thomas 221
Kutai Timur 217
INDEX
Legumes 221
LEKAS 118, 248
Le Morne Beach Resort Hotel 64
Leong Yew Kuen 126
Liew Chee Khong 90
Liew Hau Seng 90, 168
Light Point 180, 201
Lim Chong Hin 11
Lim Choong Kong 6, 10, 13, 14, 20, 21, 24, 27, 29, 33,
34, 35, 36, 44, 47, 49, 57, 80, 121, 146, 147, 156, 208
Lim Goh Tong 11
Lim Yong Keat 6, 10, 11, 14, 24, 27, 33, 37, 38, 80, 82,
121, 129, 156, 157, 207, 208, 209
Lincoln Lodge 52
Linear 201
Ling Ah Hong 223, 228
liquidity 27, 87, 173, 207, 239
logo 59, 199, 207
London 2, 10, 13, 186, 201
Loo Ah Hooi 206
Look East policy 18
Low Yat 11
Loy Boon Chen 99, 168
Lumut Naval Dockyard 20, 22
merger 19, 20, 24, 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
40, 44, 45, 78, 103, 104, 107, 108, 109, 112, 113, 114,
115, 117, 121, 126, 154, 199, 200, 210
merger & acquisition 19, 103
Metro East 186
Micasa Hotel Apartments 64
Middle East 97, 98, 124, 148, 153, 155, 167
Mid Valley Megamall 63, 131, 132, 164
mill waste management 233
Minat Teguh 226, 230
Ministry of Works 69, 153, 171
Mitsui 21, 27, 208, 209
Mitsui Construction Co. of Japan 21
MMC 105, 142, 171
Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak 98, 117, 128
Mohd Tahir 24, 156
MPH building 52
M Ramachandran 223
MRCB 117
MRP 205, 211
Muda Irrigation Project 13, 14, 15, 20
Mudajaya 10, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 28, 29,
31, 32, 34, 35, 38, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 70, 72,
80, 109, 142, 147, 149, 151, 165
Mudajaya Construction Sdn Bhd 10, 13, 72
Mulpha 72
Mumbai 90, 91, 94, 212
Mumbai-Pune Expressway 90, 91
Municipal Corporation of Delhi 93
Murugan Munusamy 237
Myanmar 64, 71, 186, 210, 215
Pahang 11, 19, 20, 105, 116, 151, 173, 177, 220, 249
Pahang-Selangor Raw Water Transfer Tunnel 173
paid up capital 24, 27, 38, 40
Pakistan 3, 25, 51, 112, 167, 211, 212
palm oil mill 69, 218, 222, 224, 225
Palm Oil Registration and Licensing Authority 69
Pankaj Agrawal 90, 91
Pan Pacific Resort Pulau Pangkor 176
Pantai Puteri Hospital 65
Parliament House 11
PATI 72
pay cuts 14, 47, 89, 123
Paynter Dixon 51
PBT 79, 88, 114, 213, 251
Peak magazine 127
Penang 9, 19, 21, 23, 36, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 65, 67, 69,
70, 135, 136, 170, 171, 178, 180, 181, 182, 184, 185,
186, 187, 188, 189, 191, 193, 196, 197, 198, 200, 201,
209, 214, 215, 249
Penang Bridge 19, 181, 185, 214
Penang Development Corporation 56, 69, 185, 197
Penang International Education and Technology
Centre 69, 70, 197
Penang State Government 181
Peninsular Gas Utilisation Export Terminal 22
Perak 14, 22, 54, 56, 65, 69, 139, 142, 176
Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor 14
Permata Estate 224
Permodalan Nasional Berhad 19, 171
Petaling Jaya 6, 23, 26, 27, 32, 64, 65, 127, 135, 191,
192, 193
Petaling Jaya-Bangsar Linkage 64
Philippines 71, 85
PJ8 192
259
S2 Heights 198
Sabah 19, 25, 27, 36, 41, 47, 57, 58, 69, 189, 197, 200,
216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 227,
228, 229, 232, 234, 235, 237, 249
San Bernardo 73
Sandakan 47, 58, 69, 189, 197, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223,
229, 232, 234, 237
Sanjay Agrawal 90, 91
Santiago 2, 73
Santubong Bridge 65
Sarawak 21, 23, 53, 65, 69, 151, 177, 189, 200, 205, 249
Satyam Construction 91
Scaffold Master 211
scholarships 41, 82
Schroders Report 75
second planting cycle 219, 236
Second Vivekananda Bridge 128, 244, 245
Selangor 6, 14, 21, 22, 23, 48, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 65,
116, 121, 139, 173, 177, 189, 193, 194, 196, 199, 215
Senai Aeromall Terminal 179
Senai Airport 173
Senior Management Dialogue 79, 113, 122, 129
Sentosa Cove 135, 136
seraya 232
Seremban 47, 64, 110, 113, 118, 128, 177, 198, 199, 248
Seremban 2 110, 113, 198, 199
shared destiny 89, 123, 139, 253
share price 27, 63, 81, 82, 97, 104, 114, 138, 142
Sharidal Complex 26, 27, 32, 34
Shell 21
Shenzhen 73, 99, 240
Shenzhen Stock Exchange 73, 99, 240
Siah Heng San 218, 221, 235
Sierra Vista 189
Sijas 222, 226, 227, 232
Sim Quan Seng 82, 125, 150, 151, 157, 205
Singapore 3, 13, 15, 20, 41, 50, 51, 52, 64, 71, 72, 74, 85,
135, 136, 167, 169, 177, 178, 210, 215, 239, 249
Soam Heng Choon 6, 108, 113, 154, 159, 191, 198, 199,
200
260
UEM 59, 72
Ulbon 54
United Asbestos Cement 14, 37, 208
United Engineers Malaysia Berhad 59
University of Malaya 9, 11
Upper Pierce Dam 20
USA 25, 47, 50, 151, 190, 210, 229, 234, 239, 249
Vela 59, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 227, 228, 229, 232,
233, 234, 235
Velayuthan Tan 59, 126, 129, 218, 219, 220, 223, 224,
227, 235
Veloo Karupayah 221
Vietnam 3, 71, 87, 90, 113, 143, 151, 167, 201, 210, 239,
242, 243, 251
Vision 2020 15, 61
Vocational Institute 52
ISBN 978-967-12002-0-9
9 789671 200209