Climate Science Basics by Ian Beardsley

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

1 of 18

Climate Science Basics


By
Ian Beardsley
Copyright 2015 by Ian Beardsley

2 of 18

Simple Model For Climate


July 11, 2014 at 3:30am

3 of 18

As climate science is a new science, there are many models for the climate
and I learned my climate science at MIT in a free online edX course. One
can generate a basic model for climate with nothing more than high school
algebra using nothing more than the temperature of the sun, the distance of
the earth from the sun, and the earths albedo, the percent of light it reflects
back into space.
The luminosity of the sun is:
L_0=3.9E26 J/s
The separation between the earth and the sun is:
1.5E11 m
The solar luminosity at the earth is reduced by the inverse square law, so
the solar constant is:
S_0=3.9E26/4(pi)(1.5E11)^2 = 1,370 watts/square meter

That is the effective energy hitting the earth per second per square meter.
This radiation is equal to the temperature, T_e, to the fourth power by the
steffan-bolzmann constant, sigma. T_e can be called the effective
temperature, the temperature entering the earth.
S_0 intercepts the earth disc, (pi)r^2, and distributes itself over the entire
earth surface, 4(pi)r^2, while 30% is reflected back into space due to the
earths albedo, a, which is equal to 0.3, so
(sigma)(T_e)^4 = (S_0/4)(1-a)
from (1-a)(S_0)((pi)r^2)/4(pi)(r^2)
But, just as the same amount of radiation that enters the system, leaves it,
to have radiative equilibrium, the atmosphere radiates back to the surface
so that the radiation from the atmosphere, (sigma)(T_a)^4 plus the

4 of 18

radiation entering the earth, (sigma)(T_e)^4 is the radiation at the surface


of the earth, (sigma)(T_s)^4. However,
(sigma)(T_a)^4=(sigma)(T_e)^4
and we have:
(sigma)(T_s)^4=(sigma)(T_a)^4 + (sigma)(T_e)^4 = 2(sigma)(T_e)^4
T_s=(2^(1/4))(T_e)

(sigma)(T_e)^4=(S_0/4)(1-a)
sigma = 5.67E-8
S_0=1,370
(1,370/4)(1-0.3)=(1,370/4)(0.7)
S_0=239.75
(sigma)(T_e)^4=239.75
(T_e)^4 = (238.75)/(5.67E-8) = 4.228E9
T_e=255 degrees kelvin
So, for the temperature at the surface of the Earth:
(sigma)(T_s) = 2(sigma)(T_e)^4
T_s=(2^(1/4))T_e
or
T_s = 1.189(255) = 303 degrees Kelvin
Lets convert that to degrees centigrade:

5 of 18

Degrees Centigrade = 303 - 273 = 30 degrees centigrade


And, lets convert that to Fahrenheit:
Degrees Fahrenheight = 30(9/5)+32=86 Degrees Fahrenheit
In reality this is warmer than the average annual temperature at the surface
of the earth, but, in this model, we only considered radiative heat transfer
and not convective heat transfer. In other words, there is cooling due to
vaporization of water (the formation of clouds) and due to the condensation
of water vapor into rain droplets (precipitation or the formation of rain).
Summary
The incoming radiation from the sun is about 1370 watts per square meter
as determined by the energy per second emitted by the sun reduced by the
inverse square law at earth orbit. We calculate the total absorbed energy
intercepted by the Earth's disc (pi)r^2, its distribution over its surface area
4(pi)r^2 and take into account that about 30% of that is reflected back into
space, so the effective radiation hitting the Earth's surface is about 70% of
the incoming radiation reduced by four. Radiative energy is equal to
temperature to the fourth power by the Stefan-boltzmann constant.
However, the effective incoming radiation is also trapped by greenhouse
gases and emitted down towards the surface of the earth (as well as
emitted up towards space from this lower atmosphere called the
troposphere), the most powerful greenhouse gas being CO2 (Carbon
Dioxide) and most abundant and important is water vapour. This doubles
the radiation warming the surface of the planet. The atmosphere is
predominately Nitrogen gas (N2) and Oxygen gas (O2), about 95 percent.
These gases, however, are not greenhouse gases. The greenhouse gas
CO2, though only exists in trace amounts, and water vapour, bring the
temperature of the Earth up from minus 18 degrees centigrade (18 below
freezing) to an observed average of plus 15 degrees centigrade (15
degrees above freezing). Without these crucial greenhouse gases, the
Earth would be frozen. They have this enormous effect on warming the
planet even with CO2 existing only at 400 parts per million. It occurs
naturally and makes life on Earth possible. However, too much of it and the
Earth can be too warm, and we are now seeing amounts beyond the

6 of 18

natural levels through anthropogenic sources, that are making the Earth
warmer than is favorable for the conditions best for life to be maximally
sustainable. We see this increase in CO2 beginning with the industrial era.
The sectors most responsible for the increase are power, industry, and
transportation. Looking at records of CO2 amounts we see that it was 315
parts per million in 1958 and rose to 390 parts per million in 2010. It rose
above 400 in 2013. Other greenhouse gases are methane (CH4) and
Nitrous Oxide (N2O). Agricultural activities dominate emissions for nitrous
oxide and methane. A healthy earth is one that is in radiative equilibrium,
that is, it loses as much radiation as it receives. Currently we are slightly
out of radiative balance, the Earth absorbs about one watt per square
meter more than it loses. That means its temperature is not steady, but
increasing.
Ian Beardsley
July 11, 2014

7 of 18

The Global Warming Versus Ice Age


Thing
July 13, 2015 at 8:55pm

8 of 18

Recently an article was published saying we have better understood the


mini-ice age theory and forget global warming added Graham Hancock.
The ice age thing is real, but a little more complicated than put forward.
Climate scientists worried about global warming have understood there are
cycles of ice ages for maybe more than 50 years. The mini ice age
happened in Europe for about 50 years in the 1750's. It would seem they
have determined more accurately how to predict when the next one is due
and they say it is will be around 2030. However, there is a much bigger ice
age that can happen that is colder and will last longer that is part of another
cycle. It is due not to anything humans do, but to perturbations in the
earth's orbit around the sun (small changes in its average yearly distance
from the sun). This cycle is one where the earth has stable seasons for
about 20,000 years, then goes into an ice age for 100,000 years.
Civilization started after the last great ice age about 20,000 years ago
when the seasons became stable, theoretically causing humans to stop
following the herds and hunting them, and to settle down in Mesopotamia
and invent agriculture. It was with this invention that humans developed,
mathematics, science, astronomy, textiles, firing for clay brick homes,
metallurgy and organized religion. But we still need to stop burning fossil
fuels and causing global warming even if there will be a mini ice age for 50
years 15 years from now because, if we don't, we will evaporate water
supplies and kill the crops before entering it. This is my understanding
from a course I took in climate science at MIT last year.

9 of 18

Unusually Cold At Night


July 23, 2015 at 5:13am

10 of 18

It has been unusually cold at night these past few nights for summer in
California. That is good, though: The yearly average temperature has
been too high these past few years due to global warming. I am hoping we
see a trend that brings that down. However, summer and spring is when
CO2 levels drop the most on Earth because there is more foliage during
that time to absorb carbon. You may say how does that make sense, when
it is winter in the Northern Hemisphere, it is summer in the Southern
Hemisphere, so there is more foliage to down there to compensate?
Apparently not, there is more land surface in the Northern Hemisphere
than in the Southern Hemisphere, so with more foliage in the Northern
Hemisphere during its summer than in the Southern Hemisphere during its
summer more carbon is absorbed in the Northern Hemisphere summer
than in the Southern Hemisphere Summer. However, with more ocean in
the Southern Hemisphere than in the Northern Hemisphere, there is more
heat loss to the planet by the Southern Hemisphere due to more
evaporation of the ocean in that area. The water evaporated forms clouds.
When those clouds precipitate (form water droplets) then the water
evaporated is returned to the earth as rain. In this process more heat is
lost. Anytime you have a phase shift- change from liquid to gas (water to
clouds) or gas to liquid (clouds to rain) you have energy loss, or heat loss
in other words. These are all aspect of Earth's natural, yearly cooling
cycles that keep the earth from becoming too warm.

11 of 18

I wrote programs in both C and Python that calculate the temperature of a


planet given its albedo, distance from its parent star and the luminosity of
the star.

12 of 18
The Program In C
#include<stdio.h>
#include<math.h>
int main(void)
{
float s, a, l, b, r, AU, N, root, number, answer, C, F;
printf("We determine the surface temperature of a planet.\n");
printf("What is the luminosity of the star in solar luminosities? ");
scanf("%f", &s);
printf("What is the albedo of the planet (0-1)?" );
scanf("%f", &a);
printf("What is the distance from the star in AU? ");
scanf("%f", &AU);
r=1.5E11*AU;
l=3.9E26*s;
b=l/(4*3.141*r*r);
N=(1-a)*b/(4*(5.67E-8));
root=sqrt(N);
number=sqrt(root);
answer=1.189*(number);
printf("The surface temperature of the planet is: %f K\n", answer);
C=answer-273;
F=(C*1.8)+32;
printf("That is %f C, or %f F", C, F);
printf("\n");
float joules;
joules=(3.9E26*s);
printf("The luminosity of the star in joules per second is: %.2fE25\n", joules/1E25);
float HZ;
HZ=sqrt(joules/3.9E26);
printf("The habitable zone of the star in AU is: %f\n", HZ);
printf("Flux at planet is %.2f times that at earth.\n", b/1370);
printf("That is %.2f Watts per square meter\n", b);
}

13 of 18

The Program In Python


print("We determine the surface temperature of a planet.")
s=float(raw_input("Enter stellar luminosity in solar luminosities: "))
a=float(raw_input("What is planet albedo (0-1)?: "))
au=float(raw_input("What is the distance from star in AU?: "))
r=(1.5)*(10**11)*au
l=(3.9)*(10**26)*s
b=l/((4.0)*(3.141)*(r**2))
N=((1-a)*b)/(4.0*((5.67)*(10**(-8))))
root=N**(1.0/2.0)
number=root**(1.0/2.0)
answer=1.189*number
print("The surface temperature of the planet is: "+str(answer)+"K")
C=answer-273
F=(9.0/5.0)*C + 32
print("That is " +str(C)+"C")
print("Which is " +str(F)+"F")
joules=3.9*(10**26)*s/1E25
lum=(3.9E26)*s
print("luminosity of star in joules per sec: "+str(joules)+"E25")
HZ=((lum/(3.9*10**26)))**(1.0/2.0)
print("The habitable zone is: "+str(HZ))
flux=b/1370.0
print("Flux at planet is "+str(flux)+" times that at earth")
print("That

14 of 18
Albedo
Albedo is a function of surface reflectivity and atmospheric reflectivity. Atmospheric albedo
seems to play the primary role in the overall albedo of a planet. Albedo is the percent of light
incident to a surface that is reflected back into space. It has a value ranging from zero to one
inclusive. Zero is a black surface absorbing all incident light and one is a white surface
reflecting all incident light back into space. Albedo plays a dominant role in the climate of a
planet. Let us see if we can find a relationship between composition of a planet and its albedo if
not in its distance from the star it orbits and its albedo, even a relationship between its albedo and
orbital number, in that albedo could be a function of distance from the star a planet orbits
because composition seems to be a function of distance of a planet from the star it orbits. As in
the inner planets are solid, or terrestrial, and the outer planets are gas giants. There may be an
analogue to the Titius-Bode rule for planetary distribution, but for albedo with respect to
planetary number. The inner planets are dominantly CO2, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and water vapor,
the outer planets, hydrogen and helium.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

Mercury albedo of 0.06 composition 95% CO2


Venus albedo of 0.75 composition clouds of sulfuric acid
Earth albedo of 0.30 composition Nitrogen, Oxygen, H20 or water vapor
Mars albedo of 0.29 composition CO2
Asteroids
Jupiter albedo of 0.53 composition hydrogen and helium
Saturn albedo of 0.47 composition hydrogen and helium
Uranus albedo of 0.51 composition hydrogen, helium, methane
Neptune albedo of 0.41 composition of hydrogen and helium

We see the outer gas giant, which are composed chiefly of hydrogen and helium have albedos
around 50%. Earth and Mars, the two planets in the habitable zone, are about the same (30%).
Go to the next page for a graph of albedo to planetary number.

15 of 18

mercury

0.06

venus

0.75

earth

0.3

mars

0.29

asteroids
jupiter

0.52

saturn

0.47

uranus

0.51

neptune

0.41

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
mercury

earth

asteroids

saturn

neptune

The average for the albedo of the inner planets is:


(0.06+0.75+0.3+0.29)/4 = 0.35
This is close to the albedo of the habitable planets Earth and Mars.
The average for the albedo of the outer planets is:
(0.52+0.47+0.51+0.41)/4 + 0.4775 ~0.48
This says the outer planets are all close to 0.48~0.5

16 of 18

All this also says, if the planet is solid and habitable it probably has an albedo of around 0.3,
otherwise it is an outer gaseous planet and probably has an albedo of around 0.5.

17 of 18

All this also says, if the planet is solid and habitable it probably has an albedo of around 0.3,
otherwise it is an outer gaseous planet and probably has an albedo of around 0.5.

18 of 18

The Author

You might also like