Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 382 views

    Complaint On Stan Hazlett (Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator)

    Uploaded by

    Conflict Gate
    Stanton Hazlett, a member of the Kansas Bar Association, failed to recuse himself from investigating a complaint filed against Judge Kurt Loy. The complainant provided evidence of a financial conflict of interest between Judge Loy and a member of the local economic board, but Hazlett dismissed this as a "hunch" without investigation. Hazlett also stated he was confident Judge Loy would recuse himself from a case, but did not explain how he could be so sure without investigating or contacting Judge Loy. The complainant requests an investigation of Hazlett for failing to properly investigate matters and making claims without evidentiary basis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Complaint On Stan Hazlett (Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator)

    Uploaded by

    Conflict Gate
    382 views2 pages
    Stanton Hazlett, a member of the Kansas Bar Association, failed to recuse himself from investigating a complaint filed against Judge Kurt Loy. The complainant provided evidence of a financial conflict of interest between Judge Loy and a member of the local economic board, but Hazlett dismissed this as a "hunch" without investigation. Hazlett also stated he was confident Judge Loy would recuse himself from a case, but did not explain how he could be so sure without investigating or contacting Judge Loy. The complainant requests an investigation of Hazlett for failing to properly investigate matters and making claims without evidentiary basis.

    Original Description:

    Complaint on Stan Hazlett (Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator)

    Original Title

    Complaint on Stan Hazlett (Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Stanton Hazlett, a member of the Kansas Bar Association, failed to recuse himself from investigating a complaint filed against Judge Kurt Loy. The complainant provided evidence of a financial conflict of interest between Judge Loy and a member of the local economic board, but Hazlett dismissed this as a "hunch" without investigation. Hazlett also stated he was confident Judge Loy would recuse himself from a case, but did not explain how he could be so sure without investigating or contacting Judge Loy. The complainant requests an investigation of Hazlett for failing to properly investigate matters and making claims without evidentiary basis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    382 views2 pages

    Complaint On Stan Hazlett (Kansas Attorney Disciplinary Administrator)

    Uploaded by

    Conflict Gate
    Stanton Hazlett, a member of the Kansas Bar Association, failed to recuse himself from investigating a complaint filed against Judge Kurt Loy. The complainant provided evidence of a financial conflict of interest between Judge Loy and a member of the local economic board, but Hazlett dismissed this as a "hunch" without investigation. Hazlett also stated he was confident Judge Loy would recuse himself from a case, but did not explain how he could be so sure without investigating or contacting Judge Loy. The complainant requests an investigation of Hazlett for failing to properly investigate matters and making claims without evidentiary basis.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    01/28/2015

    This is a complaint against Stanton Hazlett for failing to recuse/disqualify

    himself from a

    complaint I made against Kurt Loy. He states that the Kansas Bar Association or Kansas
    Bar Foundation is in no way connected to "The Disciplinary Administrator's Office".
    I beg to differ, because I think one thing they all have in common is you have to be a
    member of the BAR to be a member of any of these 3 committees as well. Stanton Hazlett is
    failing to investigate matters where he has been provided evidence and instead results to
    name calling like "frivolous" and "hunch".
    He was provided plenty of evidence of a financial conflict of interest between city economic
    board member Mark Werner and Judge Kurtis Loy through Stillwell Heritiage Education
    Foundation. I think anytime a past law partner of someone who forgives $200,000 and
    then gives another $67,000 is plenty of evidence of a financial economic interest. He also
    fails to investigate Burton Harding on a "hunch" when he was provided articles of
    incorporation showing that the judge still owns 99.5% of a corporation!!!!!!!
    ARE YOU
    KIDDING ME?????? He also is failing to investigate matters because in the last statement of
    his response in his December 31, 2014 letter he states on the last line that "I am confident
    that Judge Loy will recuse himself from that case once he learns it has been assigned to
    him"!!!!! How would Stanton Hazlett have any idea at all that judge Loy would recuse
    himself once he learns of his assignment. Is this how Stanton Hazlett investigates every
    complaint that comes to him about a judge. I suppose Mr. Hazlett would have confidence
    that recently terminated 11th judicial district magistrate Bill Lyerla followed all his duties
    properly as well yet he just got fired for obviously not following his judicial duties. Does
    Mr. Hazlett simply just say "I have confidence the judge did not or will do whatever the
    opposite of what the complainer says??? Or is it just the fact he won't investigate my
    complaints because I'm from Africa and I'm black???
    How can he be so confident unless he is good friends with Kurtis Loy and knows what he
    will do??? How can he be so confident without calling Judge Loy or investigating the matter
    like he says??? How is a copy of a docket where the case was filed on 9-25-14 and
    terminated on 10-17-14 not enough time for a judge to learn a case has been assigned to
    him??? The case was terminated over sixty (60) days ago. Why hasn't the court computers
    been updated when Judge Wachter signed the order in this case like K.S.A.60-2601.abd,
    and K.S.A.60-2601a. states are the duties ofthe clerk of the court???
    Please investigate Stanton Hazlett for failing to investigate matters and calling evidence a
    "hunch" when it seems to me that he went on a "hunch" that "he's confident Judge Loy will
    recuse himself from that case once he learns it has been assigned". There is no way

    anyone could be confident unless they actually investigated the matter which he
    claims he did not do.

    Sincerely,

    ~lV
    Eric Muathe
    Cc:
    Crawford County Court Administrator
    ACLU
    NAACP
    GOVERNOR

    You might also like