in Re Saturnino Bermudez, G.R. No. 76180

22. In re: Saturnino Bermudez, G.R. No.
76180, October 24, 1986 (Political Question)

Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
G.R. No. 76180 October 24, 1986
IN RE: SATURNINO V. BERMUDEZ, petitioner.
R E S O L U T IO N
PER CURIAM:
In a petition for declaratory relief impleading no respondents, petitioner, as a lawyer, quotes the first paragraph of Section 5
(not Section 7 as erroneously stated) of Article XVIII of the proposed 1986 Constitution, which provides in full as follows:
Sec. 5. The six-year term of the incumbent President and Vice-President elected in the February 7, 1986 election is, for
purposes of synchronization of elections, hereby extended to noon of June 30, 1992.
The first regular elections for the President and Vice-President under this Constitution shall be held on the second Monday of
May, 1992.
Claiming that the said provision "is not clear" as to whom it refers, he then asks the Court "to declare and answer the
question of the construction and definiteness as to who, among the present incumbent President Corazon Aquino and VicePresident Salvador Laurel and the elected President Ferdinand E. Marcos and Vice-President Arturo M. Tolentino being
referred to under the said Section 7 (sic) of ARTICLE XVIII of the TRANSITORY PROVISIONS of the proposed 1986
Constitution refers to, . ...
The petition is dismissed outright for lack of jurisdiction and for lack for cause of action.
Prescinding from petitioner's lack of personality to sue or to bring this action, (Tan vs. Macapagal, 43 SCRA 677), it is
elementary that this Court assumes no jurisdiction over petitions for declaratory relief. More importantly, the petition amounts
in effect to a suit against the incumbent President of the Republic, President Corazon C. Aquino, and it is equally elementary
that incumbent Presidents are immune from suit or from being brought to court during the period of their incumbency and
tenure.
The petition furthermore states no cause of action. Petitioner's allegation of ambiguity or vagueness of the aforequoted
provision is manifestly gratuitous, it being a matter of public record and common public knowledge that the Constitutional
Commission refers therein to incumbent President Corazon C. Aquino and Vice-President Salvador H. Laurel, and to no other
persons, and provides for the extension of their term to noon of June 30, 1992 for purposes of synchronization of elections.
Hence, the second paragraph of the cited section provides for the holding on the second Monday of May, 1992 of the first
regular elections for the President and Vice-President under said 1986 Constitution. In previous cases, the legitimacy of the
government of President Corazon C. Aquino was likewise sought to be questioned with the claim that it was not established
pursuant to the 1973 Constitution. The said cases were dismissed outright by this court which held that:
Petitioners have no personality to sue and their petitions state no cause of action. For the legitimacy of the Aquino
government is not a justiciable matter. It belongs to the realm of politics where only the people of the Philippines are the
judge. And the people have made the judgment; they have accepted the government of President Corazon C. Aquino which
is in effective control of the entire country so that it is not merely a de facto government but in fact and law a de jure
government. Moreover, the community of nations has recognized the legitimacy of tlie present government. All the eleven
members of this Court, as reorganized, have sworn to uphold the fundamental law of the Republic under her government.
(Joint Resolution of May 22, 1986 in G.R. No. 73748 [Lawyers League for a Better Philippines, etc. vs. President Corazon C.
Aquino, et al.]; G.R. No. 73972 [People's Crusade for Supremacy of the Constitution. etc. vs. Mrs. Cory Aquino, et al.]; and
G.R. No. 73990 [Councilor Clifton U. Ganay vs. Corazon C. Aquino, et al.])
For the above-quoted reason, which are fully applicable to the petition at bar, mutatis mutandis, there can be no question that
President Corazon C. Aquino and Vice-President Salvador H. Laurel are the incumbent and legitimate President and VicePresident of the Republic of the Philippines.or the above-quoted reasons, which are fully applicable to the petition at bar,
ACCORDINGLY, the petition is hereby dismissed.
Teehankee, C.J., Feria, Yap, Fernan, Narvasa, Alampay and Paras, JJ., concur.
MELENCIO-HERRERA, J., concurring:
GUTIERREZ, Jr., J., concurring:
FELICIANO, JJ., concurring.
The petitioner asks the Court to declare who are "the incumbent President and Vice President elected in the February 7,
1986 elections" as stated in Article XVIII, Section 5 of the Draft Constitution adopted by the Constitutional Commission of
1986.
We agree that the petition deserves outright dismissal as this Court has no original jurisdiction over petitions for declaratory
relief.
As to lack of cause of action, the petitioner's prayer for a declaration as to who were elected President and Vice President in
the February 7, 1986 elections should be addressed not to this Court but to other departments of government constitutionally
burdened with the task of making that declaration.
The 1935 Constitution, the 1913 Constitution as amended, and the 1986 Draft Constitution uniformly provide 'that boards of
canvassers in each province and city shall certified who were elected President and Vice President in their respective areas.
The certified returns are transmitted to the legislature which proclaims, through the designated Presiding Head, who were
duty elected.
Copies of the certified returns from the provincial and city boards of canvassers have not been furnished this Court nor is
there any need to do so. In the absence of a legislature, we cannot assume the function of stating, and neither do we have
any factual or legal capacity to officially declare, who were elected President and Vice President in the February 7, 1986
elections.
As to who are the incumbent President and Vice President referred to in the 1986 Draft Constitution, we agree that there is no
doubt the 1986 Constitutional Commission referred to President Corazon C. Aquino and Vice President Salvador H. Laurel.
Finally, we agree with the Resolution of the Court in G.R. Nos. 73748, 73972, and 73990.
For the foregoing reasons, we vote to DISMISS the instant petition.
CRUZ, J., concurring:
I vote to dismiss this petition on the ground that the Constitution we are asked to interpret has not yet been ratified and is
therefore not yet effective. I see here no actual conflict of legal rights susceptible of judicial determination at this time. (Aetna
Life Insurance Co. vs. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227; PACU vs. Secretary of Education, 97 Phil. 806.)

in Re Saturnino Bermudez, G.R. No. 76180

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

in Re Saturnino Bermudez, G.R. No. 76180

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

in Re Saturnino Bermudez, G.R. No. 76180

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

22. In re: Saturnino Bermudez, G.R. No.

76180, October 24, 1986 (Political Question)

You might also like