Neutral Zone
Neutral Zone
Neutral Zone
DOI 10.1007/s13191-011-0055-z
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 11 June 2010 / Accepted: 27 February 2011 / Published online: 30 March 2011
Indian Prosthodontic Society 2011
Introduction
The management of highly resorbed ridge has always
posed a challenge to the prosthodontist for years. The fact
that alveolar bone tends to resorb under complete lower
denture is known to both, the clinician as well as the user of
complete denture [1]. It is also accepted that the rate of
resorption varies from person to person [2]. Atwood categorized ridge form into six orders ranging from preextraction state (Order I) to the atrophic depressed mandibular ridge (Order VI) [3].
Advances in health care have resulted in a number of
long term denture wearers [4, 5]. Highly resorbed residual
mandibular ridge is commonly observed in older patients,
along with thin, atrophic mucosa and lower threshold of
pain, with diminished resiliency of tissues and muscle
tonicity accompanied by poor adaptive capacity. Providing
a stable lower denture for such patients has been a more
difficult problem encountered by dentist [6]. The journey
towards successful denture fabrication for such patients
begins with an accurate impression that will help to ensure
that the complete denture is stable, that provides physiological comfort to the patient [7].
The use of ridge augmentation and implants is generally
advocated for such patients. However, treatment option of
ridge augmentation and implant procedures may not
always be possible and conventional dentures can have an
equivalent positive impact on the health related quality of
life [4]. So, an effort has been made to improve stability of
mandibular denture by combining various techniques to
obtain an accurate impression.
123
33
123
34
Discussion
Conclusion
123
References
1. McCord JF, Tyson KW (1997) A conservative prosthodontic
option for the treatment of edentulous patients with atrophic (flat)
mandibular ridges. Br Dent J 182:469472
2. Atwood DA (1996) The problem of reduction of residual ridges.
In: Winkler S (ed) Essentials of complete denture prosthodontics.
2nd edn, Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, St Louis, pp 2238
35
3. Atwood DA (1963) Post extraction changes in the adult mandible
as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and
serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 13:810824
4. Fernandes V, Singh RK, Chitre V, Aras M (2001) Functional and
esthetic rehabilitation of a patient with highly resorbed, asymmetrical residual ridge. JIPS 1:2224
5. Mirza FD, Dikshit JV (2002) Management of lower poor
foundationa simple solution. JIPS 2:1618
6. Prithviraj DR, Singh V, Kumar S, Shruti DP (2008) Conservative
prosthodontic procedure to improve mandibular denture stability in
an atrophic mandibular ridge. JIPS 8:178183
7. Jacobson TE, Krol AJ (1983) A contemporary review of the
factors in complete denture retention, stability and support.
J Prosthet Dent 49:306313
8. Tryde G, Olsson K, Jensen SAA, Cantor R, Tarsetano JJ, Brill N
(1965) Dynamic impression methods. J Prosthet Dent 15:
10231034
9. Brill N, Tryde G, Cantor R (1965) Dynamic nature of lower
denture space. J Prosthet Dent 15:401418
123