"Interim Order: WTM/SR/EFD/DRA II/ 83 /04/2015

WTM/SR/EFD/DRA II/ 83 /04/2015
BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

CORAM: S. RAMAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER
ORDER
Under Sections 11 and 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 read with Regulation 35 of SEBI (Intermediaries)
Regulations, 2008 in respect of the Unregistered Sub-broking activities of Mrs. Reena Bansal
(PAN: AHRPB9035G), wife of late Mr. Rajeev Bansal, Sub-broker affiliated to ICICI Securities
Ltd.
___________________________________________________________________________________
1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as "SEBI") vide an ad interim order
dated April 21, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the "interim order") restrained Mrs. Reena Bansal
(hereinafter referred to as the "Noticee") from buying, selling and dealing in the securities market in
any manner whatsoever and prohibited her from accessing the securities market, directly or indirectly,
either for herself or for her clients. The depositories; National Securities Depository Ltd. (NSDL) and
Central Depository Services Ltd. (CDSL) were also directed not to give effect to any debit instruction in
the demat accounts of Mrs. Reena Bansal or in the demat accounts of any beneficial owner on the
authority of power of attorney obtained by her.
2. The Noticee was the wife of late Mr. Rajeev Bansal, who was a sub-broker affiliated to ICICI Securities
Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "I-Sec") and was a member of National Stock Exchange of India (NSE)
and The Stock Exchange, Mumbai (BSE). The interim order was passed on the basis of the prima facie
findings that the Noticee had acted as an unregistered sub-broker and had dealt in the securities on
behalf of the clients without obtaining certificate of registration from SEBI and violated Regulation
11(1) of SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub-brokers) Regulations, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as "SEBI
Broker and Sub-broker Regulations") and Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act, 1992. The Noticee was
provided 21 days time to file her reply and also to avail an opportunity of personal hearing, if she so
desired.
3. The interim order sent to the Noticee vide letter dated April 21, 2011 at her last known address was
returned undelivered with a remark 'shifted'. In view of this, I-Sec, who was the broker of the Noticee,
was also advised to serve the interim order upon the Noticee. I-Sec, vide letter dated May 24, 2011,
Page 1 of 5
Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz
communicated to SEBI that it had couriered the interim order to Mrs. Reena Bansal at her address and
enclosed a copy of the consignment tracker, which showed that the consignment was received by a
person named "Reena". However no reply was received from the Noticee. In the intervening period,
SEBI sent the interim order to the Noticee vide letter dated May 18, 2011. The same was, however
returned undelivered with a remark 'left'.
3.1 As a measure of abundant caution, a newspaper advertisement was also issued on May 15, 2013 in
'The Times of India' (English Language - All editions) and Vijay Karnataka/Prajavani (Kannada
Language - Karnataka Region) advising the Noticee to collect the interim order from SEBI and
submit her reply, if any, within 14 days from the date of publication of the advertisement. Despite
the multiple attempts and various modes of serving the interim order on the Noticee, she has not filed
her reply till date.
4. An opportunity of personal hearing was also granted to the Noticee on March 26, 2014 through a notice
of hearing dated March 06, 2014 issued to the Noticee on her last known address. The same was
returned undelivered. In view of the same, a newspaper advertisement was issued on March 11, 2014 in
'The Times of India' (English Language - All editions) and 'Vijay Karnataka' (Kannada Language Karnataka Region) advising the Noticee to attend the personal hearing on the scheduled date. Despite
the same, the Noticee did not avail the opportunity for personal hearing.
5. Considering that no communication has been received from the Noticee, despite sufficient
opportunities granted to her to reply to the interim order and also considering the fact that the Noticee
failed to avail the opportunity of personal hearing, SEBI passed an Order dated June 09, 2014
confirming the directions of the interim order dated April 21, 2011. Subsequently a notice was issued to
the Noticee on December 22, 2014 advising her to show cause as to why action under Regulation 35 of
SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as "Intermediaries Regulations")
read with Section 11of the SEBI Act, 1992 including restraining her from accessing the capital market
and prohibiting from buying, selling or dealing in the securities market in any manner for a particular
period should not be initiated against her for the violation of Section 12(1) of SEBI Act, 1992 and
Regulation 11(1) of SEBI Brokers and Sub-brokers Regulations, 1992. The copies of the notice were
sent to the address of the Noticee available on records. However, the notice could not be served upon
the Noticee at any of the four addresses available with SEBI, ICICI Securities, SEBI-Southern Regional
Page 2 of 5
Office and the Bangalore Stock Exchange. In the circumstances as detailed above, it is clear that the
Noticee is deliberately avoiding any communication from SEBI.
6. In view of the failure on the part of the Noticee to co-operate with the proceedings initiated by SEBI, I
am constrained to proceed on the basis of the material available on record such as the notice to show
cause, information/documents gathered from I-Sec, NSE, BSE, NSDL and CDSL and other material
available on record. On the basis of the same, I shall now proceed to deal with the charges alleged
against the Noticee in the SCN. The issue under consideration is whether the Noticee has dealt in
securities on behalf of the clients and thus acted as a sub-broker without obtaining the necessary
registration from SEBI.
The relevant legal provisions, the contravention of which have been alleged in this case are
reproduced hereunder:Section 12 (1) of the SEBI Act, 1992
"No stock broker, sub-broker, share transfer agent, banker to an issue, trustee of trust deed, registrar to an issue, merchant
banker, underwriter, portfolio manager, investment adviser and such other intermediary who may be associated with securities
market shall buy, sell or deal in securities except under, and in accordance with, the conditions of a certificate of registration
obtained from the Board in accordance with the regulations made under this Act"
Regulation 11(1) of the SEBI Broker and Sub-broker Regulations
"Registration as sub-broker.
No sub-broker shall act as such unless he holds a certificate granted by the Board under these regulations."
7. Upon analyzing the information/documents in respect of the transactions executed by the Noticee and
her husband, Mr. Rajeev Bansali obtained from NSE, BSE, NSDL, CDSL and I Sec, the following are
observed:
i.
The shares purchased in the trading account of the Noticee maintained with I- Sec were
subsequently transferred off-market to the demat accounts of various clients of Noticee's late
husband, (Mr. Rajeev Bansal, who was a sub-broker affiliated to I-Sec). From the Annexure 2 of
the SCN, it is observed that around 38 such off-market transfers have taken place from the
demat account of the Noticee to various clients during the aforesaid period.
Page 3 of 5
ii.
The Noticee has received shares in her demat account in off-market transaction from the
accounts of various clients. It is observed from the Annexure 3 to the SCN that around 81 such
off market transactions have taken place in the demat account of the Noticee during the period
from May 2006 to November 2007. These shares were subsequently sold by the Noticee in the
market.
iii.
The bank account of the Noticee with ICICI Bank (linked with her trading account), indicates
that the Noticee received/paid money from/to various clients. It is observed from Annexure 4
of the SCN that the Noticee received funds approximately Rs. 1.56 crores from various clients
and has paid an amount of Rs. 1.64 crores to various clients during the period April 01, 2006March 31, 2011.
7.1 The aforesaid analysis in respect of the trading accounts maintained by the Noticee with I- Sec and
the instances of cash receipts/ payments to/from the ICICI Bank account of the Noticee and the
bank accounts of the clients thus clearly indicate that the Noticee was acting as an agent by
continuously dealing in the securities on behalf of clients. The aforesaid activities of the Noticee
were undertaken without obtaining registration from SEBI to act as a sub-broker. Section 12(1) of
the SEBI Act and Regulation 11(1) of the SEBI Broker and Sub-brokers Regulations specifically
mandate that no sub-brokers shall act as such unless he holds registration certificate granted by the
Board.
7.2 The Noticee has not responded to any of the communications sent by SEBI. It is observed that
even after the receipt of the interim order served to her by I-Sec at the request of SEBI, she chose not
to respond to it (as mentioned in Paragraph No. 3 above). The total non-cooperation on the part of
the Noticee to the instant proceedings, can only lead to an adverse inference against the Noticee.
8. In the light of the aforesaid observations, it is clear that the Noticee, by dealing in securities on behalf
of the clients and transferring/receiving money to/from the accounts of various clients, functioned as a
sub-broker without obtaining registration from SEBI. Such activities of the Noticee are in violation of
Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act and Regulation 11(1) of the SEBI Broker and Sub-brokers Regulations.
Page 4 of 5
9. I note that SEBI, vide interim order dated April 21, 2011 (later confirmed through the Confirmatory
Order dated June 09, 2014) restrained the Noticee from buying, selling, dealing in the securities market
in any manner or accessing the securities market, directly or indirectly either herself or for her clients till
further orders in the matter and the Noticee has already undergone the restraint for a period of
approximately 4 years.
10. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I, in exercise of the powers conferred
upon me under Section 19 read with Sections 11 and 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 35 of
SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008, do hereby restrain Mrs. Reena Bansal (PAN: AHRPB9035G)
from buying, selling or dealing in securities market whatsoever or accessing the securities market,
directly or indirectly, for a period of 5 years from the date of this order. The period of debarment
already undergone by the Noticee, vide the interim order dated April 21, 2011 mentioned in Paragraph
No. 9 above shall be set off from the period of debarment as directed above.
11. This order shall come into force with immediate effect.
12. This order shall be served on all the recognized stock exchanges and the depositories to ensure
compliance with above directions.
Place: Mumbai
Date: April 22, 2015
S. RAMAN
WHOLE TIME MEMBER
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
Page 5 of 5

"Interim Order: WTM/SR/EFD/DRA II/ 83 /04/2015

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

"Interim Order: WTM/SR/EFD/DRA II/ 83 /04/2015

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

"Interim Order: WTM/SR/EFD/DRA II/ 83 /04/2015

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

WTM/SR/EFD/DRA II/ 83 /04/2015

BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

You might also like