Update On PDPH
Update On PDPH
Update On PDPH
AnUpdateonPostdural Puncture
HeadacheAfteranEpiduralBlock
JamesBates,PhD,MD
AssociateProfessor
DirectorofthedivisionofOBanesthesia
ClinicalcoordinatorMOR
DepartmentofAnesthesia
UniversityofIowaCollegeofMedicine
Disclosure
Ihavenofinancialrelationshipswith
manufacturersofpharmaceuticalsordevices.
5/8/2013
5/8/2013
PDPH: Etiology
DuralpuncturewithcontinuedCSFleak
Decreasedintracranialpressure
Presumedvascularexpansionasintracranial
pressuredrops
5/8/2013
Largeboreneedles
Multipleattempts(multipleholesindura)
Youngadults>olderadults
Adults>children
Females>males
Cuttingtipneedles>penciltipneedles
Historyofmigraines,chronicHA,previousPDPH
?DiagnosticLP>spinalanesthesia
56.2
43.8
9
2
29
53
7
PDPH
14%
15%
9%
18%
10%
16%
18%
6%
5/8/2013
5/8/2013
Airvs salineforlossofresistancemedium
CombinedSpinalEpidural(CSE)vs epidural
Orientationofneedlebevel
Epiduralneedledesign
Ultrasoundguidedinsertion
Conversiontocontinuousspinalanesthesia
Prophylacticepiduralbloodpatches
Analgesics
Caffeine
Theophyline
Sumatriptan
Cosyntropin (ACTH)
Epiduralmorphine
5/8/2013
Effect of Interventions
Reduced incidence of ADP
None found
Reduced incidence of PDPH
Prophylactic blood patch
Lateral orientation of the needle bevel during insertion
Use non cutting point epidural needle
Epidural morphine
Administration of cosyntropin
No statistically significant reduction of either ADP or PDPH
CSE
Medium used for loss of resistance technique
Ultrasound or acoustic device to assist epidural insertion
Continuous spinal analgesia
5/8/2013
2.
3.
4.
5.
5/8/2013
19MaternityunitsinUK
Randomizedbymaternityunit;reversedinyr 2
97womenwithaccidentaldural puncture(ADP)
Randomizedto:
repeatepidural
threadingcatheterthroughdural punctureforCSA
PatientswithADP
DevelopedPDPH
ReceivedEBP
RepeatEpid
47
62%
55%
CSA
50
72%
50%
p
ns
ns
Intrathecalcatheterizationandtheincidenceof
postdural punctureheadache.
5/8/2013
Intrathecalcatheterizationandtheneedforepiduralbloodpatch.
RCTs of PEBP
Previousstudieslackedrandomization,blinding,proper
protocolstopreventbiasandpowerofsuggestion.
3RandomizedcontrolledtrialsofPEBPinOBpatients.
1.
2.
3.
10
5/8/2013
Randomized,controlled,partiallyblinded(observer
butnotsubject)trial
21OBpatientswithADP
PEBPviacatheterasitwasremovedafterlabor
After24hrs offeredtherapeuticEBP
DevelopedPDPH
ReceivedEBP
PEBP
1/ 10
1/10
Control
7/11
5/11
P
0.02
ns
Randomizedcontrolledunblinded trial
39OBpatientswithADP
15mlPEBPviacatheterasitwasremovedvs oral
hydration&bedrest.
DevelopedPDPH
ReceivedEBP
PEBP
4/ 19
3/ 19
Control
16/20
7/20
P
<0.001
ns
11
5/8/2013
Randomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedtrial
64OBpatientswithADP
15mlPEBPviacathetervs shaminjection.
StandardizedcriteriatodeterminationneedforEBP
DevelopedPDPH
ReceivedEBP
PEBP
18/ 32
11/ 32
Control
18/ 32
15/ 32
P
ns
ns
12
5/8/2013
13
5/8/2013
14
5/8/2013
EpiduralMorphineDecreasesRateofPDPH
50OBpatientswithrecognizedADP
Epiduralmorphine300mgq24hr x2before
catheterremoved.
DevelopedPDPH
ReceivedEBP
Epid MS
3/ 25
0/ 25
Control
12/ 25
4/ 25
P
0.014
?
IntravenousACTHDecreasesRateofPDPH
90OBpatientswithrecognizedADP
30minutesafterdeliveryandcatheterremoval,
patientsrandomizedto
1mgcosyntropin (syntheticACTH)[iv]vs placebo.
DevelopedPDPH
ReceivedEBP
ACTH
15/ 45
5/ 45
Control
31/ 45
13/ 45
P
0.001
0.035
15
5/8/2013
Oral Caffeine
Camann etal.1990Anes Analg 70:181
40PostpartumpatientswithPDPH
29/40=26GQuincke,11/40=17Gepidural
Oralcapsuleof300mgcaffeineorplacebo
Numberofpatientsbetterorworseat4hours
#WORSE#BETTER
18
2 Caffeine
8
-10
12
Placebo
-5
10
15
20
VAS4hr
VAS24hr EBP
36.1 5.5
41 835%
10.9 6.7
31 1055%
P=0.014
P=nsP=ns
16
5/8/2013
17
5/8/2013
P=0.01forgroup15mLversusgroups20and30mL.
ToLessentherateofPDPH:
Maybe prophylacticEBP
Maybe threadingcatheterforCSA
Maybe usingSprotte epiduralneedle
Maybe epiduralmorphineorivACTH
Caffeinegivessometemporaryrelief
TherapeuticEBPworkswell.
EBPwith20mlgivesmaximumbenefit.
18