Moving Forward With Understanding by Design

A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u p e r vision and C ur r iculum De ve lop me nt
A l exand r ia, Vir g inia USA
About the Developers

This guide was developed by John L. Brown, education consultant,
and Diane Jackson, program manager, ASCD.
The video program for Moving Forward with Understanding by
Design was produced by ASCD and Duet Communications, LLC.
We gratefully acknowledge the support and participation throughout
the development of this program from Moreland Elementary School,
A. Z. Kelsey Middle School, and Grifn High School in Grifn, Georgia, and Joel E. Ferris High School in Spokane, Washington.
We also acknowledge Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe for their continued contributions and support.
ASCD Staff
Video Production
Diane Jackson, Producer and Program Manager
John L. Brown, Consultant
Ann Cunningham-Morris, Development Team Member
Debbie Howerton, Program Specialist
Manual Production
Gary Bloom, Director, Design and Production Services
Dina Seamon, Production Specialist, Team Lead
Mary Beth Nielsen, Manager, Editorial Services
Lisa Post, Associate Editor
Keith Demmons, Desktop Publishing Specialist
Sarah Plumb, Production Specialist
ASCD is a diverse, international community of educators, forging
covenants in teaching and learning for the success of all learners.
Founded in 1943, ASCD is a nonpartisan, international education
association with headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia.
ASCD publications present a variety of viewpoints. The views
expressed or implied in the video-based program and manual should
not be interpreted as ofcial positions of the Association.
Copyright 2007 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development, 1703 North Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA 223111713. All rights reserved. Materials in the Activities and Resources
sections of this guide are designed as part of this video staff development program. For this purpose, materials in these sections of the
guide may be reproduced. Any other use of these materials is prohibited, unless written permission is granted by ASCD.
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Telephone: 1-800-933-2723 or 1-703-578-9600
Fax: 1-703-575-5400
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet: www.ascd.org
ASCD Stock Nos.: Entire Set, 607012; User Guide, 607012BD; DVD,
607012DVD
ISBNs: User Guide, 978-1-4166-0464-8; DVD, 978-1-4166-0463-1
INTRODUCTION
Background Information for Moving Forward with
Understanding by Design ...................................................................................... 1
Purpose of the Program ......................................................................................... 2
About the Program ................................................................................................. 3
Program Objectives ................................................................................................ 5
Customize the Program for Your Professional Development Needs .................. 5
ACTIVITIES
Understanding by Design: An Overview
Activity 1.1 Previewing and Postviewing ................................................... 14
Activity 1.2 Dealing with Misconceptions ................................................... 16
Activity 1.3 Key Principles of Understanding by Design............................ 26
Activity 1.4 What Have We Learned? .......................................................... 32
Activity 1.5 Traditional Versus Teaching for
Understanding Approaches ..................................................... 37
Activity 1.6 Characteristics of Understanding by Design Students ............ 42
Understanding by Design in the Classroom
Activity 2.1 Previewing and Postviewing .................................................... 46
Activity 2.2 Aspects of Backward Design.................................................... 52
Activity 2.3 Connections Among the Three Stages ................................... 105
Activity 2.4 Exploring Stage 1: Identify Desired Results ......................... 109
Activity 2.5 Exploring Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence ............. 111
Activity 2.6 Exploring Stage 3: Plan Learning Activities .......................... 113
Understanding by Design and the School Improvement Process
Activity 3.1 Previewing and Postviewing .................................................. 116
Activity 3.2 Exploring Understanding by Design
for School and District Use..................................................... 119
Activity 3.3 Schools That Promote Understanding ................................... 156
Activity 3.4 Professional Development That
Promotes Understanding ........................................................ 162
Activity 3.5 Implementation Challenges .................................................... 166
Understanding by Design: The Experts and Practitioners Speak

Activity 4.1 Large Group Questions and Strategies ................................. 172
Activity 4.2 Small Study Group Questions and Strategies ....................... 176
Activity 4.3 Independent Study Questions and Strategies ...................... 179
Activity 4.4 Assessing Teaching and Professional Development ............. 181
Classroom Examples
Activity 5.1 Observing Backward Design in Classroom Examples .......... 190
RESOURCES
Glossary of Understanding by Design Terms............................................. 195
References .................................................................................................... 202
Resources ..................................................................................................... 203
iv
LIST OF REPRODUCIBLE MATERIALS
Title

K-W-L Chart (1.1)*
You Can Teach for Meaning (1.2)
Large Group Guiding Questions (1.2)
Small Study Group Guiding Questions (1.2)
Independent Study Guiding Questions (1.2)
Key Principles of Understanding by Design (1.3)
Questions to Explore Key Principles (1.3)
Key Principles Self-Reection Questionnaire (1.3)
Lessons Learned Outline (1.4)
Large Group Lessons Learned (1.4)
Lessons Learned Discussion Topics (1.4)
Comparison Matrix (1.5)
Large Group Comparison Matrix Questions (1.5)
Independent Study Follow-Up Questions (1.5)
A List of Student Characteristics (1.6)
Student Characteristics Questions (1.6)
K-W-L Chart (2.1)
Backward Design Observation Checklist (2.1)
Independent Study Guiding Questions (2.1)
Article Summaries (2.2)
Overall Guiding Questions (2.2)
The Most Important Data and Guiding Questions (2.2)
Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding and Guiding Questions
(2.2)
Looking at Student Work and Guiding Questions (2.2)
Helping Students Understand Assessment and Guiding Questions (2.2)
My Year as a High School Student and Guiding Questions (2.2)
Seven Practices for Effecting Learning and Guiding Questions (2.2)
A Time and a Place for Authentic Learning and Guiding Questions
(2.2)
The Engaged Classroom and Guiding Questions (2.2)
Connecting Principles for the Three Stages (2.3)
Stage 1: A Self-Reection Questionnaire (2.4)
Previewing and Postviewing Chart (3.1)
Reective Questions (3.2)
School ImprovementAligned! and Guiding Questions (3.2)
How Schools Sustain Success and Guiding Questions (3.2)
What Is a Professional Learning Community? and Guiding Questions
(3.2)
Pathways to Reform: Start with Values and Guiding Questions (3.2)
Page
Large
Group
Small Study Independent

Group
Study
15
17
23
24
25
27
29
30
33
35
36
38
40
41
43
44
47
48
51
53
54
55
60
68
74
80
84
93
100
106
110
112
114
117
120
121
126
133
141
LIST OF REPRODUCIBLE MATERIALS (continued)
Title
Page
Leadership for Lasting Reform and Guiding Questions (3.2)

Self-Reection Checklist (3.3)
Organizational Review Questions (3.3)
Questions for Further Investigation (3.3)
Organizational Review Checklist Questions (3.3)
Evaluating Professional Development Questionnaire (3.4)
Large Group Guiding Questions (3.4)
Reection Questions (3.4)
Comparison Matrix (3.5)
Comparison Matrix Reection Questions (3.5)
Independent Reection Questions (3.5)
Previewing and Postviewing (4.1)
Getting Started with Understanding by Design (4.1)
Small Study Group Options (4.2)
Guiding Questions (4.3)
Examining the Teaching Life and Guiding Questions (4.4)
Classroom Examples
Backward Design Observation Checklist (5.1)
Large
Group
Small Study Independent

Group
Study
149
157
159
160
161
163
164
165
167
168
169
173
174
177
180
182
191
* The numbers in parentheses refer to the activity in which the reproducible can be found.
vi
NT RO DUC T I O N
Background Information for Moving Forward with

Understanding by Design
This program and user guide are designed for educators interested in
exploring what has been learned about the successful implementation
of Understanding by Design in classrooms and schools. By using this
program and the accompanying professional development activities
and resources, users can explore the inevitable issues and challenges
educators confront when collaborating to provide an education emphasizing student understanding, not just mechanical knowledge-recall
learning. This program also provides examples of what Understanding
by Design and its three interrelated stages might look like when implemented in elementary, middle, and high school classes.
Moving Forward with Understanding by Design emphasizes the continuum of experiences that are an importantand inevitablepart
of successful Understanding by Design implementation. In the video,
participating educators and administrators vary from those in their rst
year of using the Understanding by Design framework to those with
multiple years of experience. This important element is reinforced
through the extensive self-reection activities included in this guide.
Additionally, users of this program will be able to expand their investigation of Understanding by Design to include four signicant strands:
1. Understanding by Design: An OverviewThe learning principles
underlying this framework, including an overview of its evolution.
2. Understanding by Design in the ClassroomExamples that can
be used to discuss and analyze the ways the three stages of the
backward design process manifest in elementary, middle, and high
school classroom settings.
3. Understanding by Design and The School Improvement Process
The implications of Understanding by Design for school improvement planning, including insights into professional development.
4. Understanding by Design: The Experts and Practitioners Speak
Reections from experts and practitioners on various Understanding
by Design topics.
What Is Understanding by Design?
As described by authors Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe, Understanding by Design is not a prescriptive program, nor is it a philosophy
of education. It is a way of thinking more purposefully and carefully
about the nature of any design that has understanding as the goal
M ov i n g Fo r wa rd w i th U n d e r s t a n d i n g by De s i g n
(2005, p. 7). In todays world, students need to be able to do more than

memorize facts and processes; they need to understand what they are
learning.
For students to understand, educators must change their thought processes with respect to curriculum design. The traditional approach of
organizing learning activities and then developing assessments does
not support learning for understanding. Instead, educators need to
focus on the big ideas of each topic. What is essential for students to
learn? Once big ideas are established, the next step is to design assessments that will provide evidence of student learning of those big ideas.
After that, and only then, will educators be in a position to design and
sequence learning activities that will lead students to an understanding
of the big ideas.
This three-stage approach to planning curriculum is referred to as
backward design.
Stage 1: Identify Desired Results
What should students know, understand, and be able to do? In Stage 1,
consider the goals, examine content standards, and review curriculum
expectations.
Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence
What assessment evidence will we accept as evidence of student
understanding? In Stage 2, consider a variety of evidence, including
both formative and summative assessments. Teaching for understanding
means assessing for understanding.
Stage 3: Plan Learning Activities
What sequence of learning activities will lead students to an understanding of the big ideas? In Stage 3, consider the knowledge and skills
that students will need to know to perform effectively. Identify the
materials and resources that will best meet the goals set out in Stage 1.
Purpose of the Program

The activities in this guide are designed to stimulate exploration, discussion, and sharing in a large or small study group setting. An individual may also use the program and activities for personal reection
and growth. The large group, small group, and individual settings are
designed to enable participants to
I n tro d u c ti o n
Use the Understanding by Design tools to work smarter in curriculum and assessment design.
Incorporate the Understanding by Design theory as a way of
thinking, planning, and reviewing curriculum designs.
Understand that the Understanding by Design framework is
appropriate for any content area and learning level in which
understanding is desired.
About the Program

This program examines what Understanding by Design is, what classrooms look like when they reect key principles of Understanding by
Design, what schools look like when they successfully embody principles of Understanding by Design, and what the experts and practitioners say about the evolution of Understanding by Design.
This strand addresses the learning theory underlying the Understanding
by Design framework, particularly how Understanding by Design offers
a framework and consensus-driven language for curriculum design,
instruction, and assessment that promote understanding and transfer.
This strand provides a detailed exploration of what each of the stages
of Understanding by Design looks like in classrooms at the elementary,
middle, and high school levels.
Stage 1: Identify desired results that focus on enduring understandings, essential questions, and the six facets of understanding.
Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidence that includes a balanced,
photo-album approach to assessment.
Stage 3: Design and sequence learning activities by applying the
principles of W.H.E.R.E.T.O.
It also addresses the following questions:
1. What can I observe in classrooms that are successfully implementing Understanding by Design principles and strategies?
2. How do successful educators promote student understanding?
3. To what extent can I expect to observe different levels of use and

complexity as educators deepen their understanding of the Understanding by Design framework?
This strand explores the emerging implications of Understanding by
Design for the school improvement planning process.
How can educators promote the principles of equity and excellence using the Understanding by Design framework?
How can educators use Understanding by Design to improve
their professional development?
What are the inevitable issues, implementation gaps, and problems that must be confronted to implement Understanding by
Design successfully in school settings?
This strand provides participants with an opportunity to reect on
how the experts of Understanding by Design, Grant Wiggins and Jay
McTighe, and practitioners view the framework with respect to the
following:
Where do we start?
How long does it take to become procient with the backward
design process?
What are the challenges?
What does Understanding by Design look like in the classroom?
How does Understanding by Design work at a school or district
level?
Classroom Examples
The elementary, middle, and high school examples provide participants
with an opportunity to view key elements of units that were presented
over an extended period of time.
Program Objectives
By the end of this program, participants will be able to
Identify strategies for implementing the three stages of the
backward design process in classroom unit design, systemic curriculum development, and classroom observations.
Integrate the principles of Understanding by Design into unit
study and professional development.
Customize the Program for Your Professional

Development Needs
Whether using this guide for large groups, for small study groups, or as
independent study, keep in mind that when people view a video-based
program, each may see, hear, and learn something different. Consequently, if participants discuss their different insights, they will often
learn more than if they viewed the program without the follow-up
activities. These activities can promote further reection and support
the participants efforts to plan for the effective application of the ideas
presented in the program.
This guide is designed to help you get the best possible benets from
Moving Forward with Understanding by Design. The activities included
serve as a starting point. Participants should be encouraged to raise
their own questions based on the particular needs or concerns of the
school, district, or community. The guides structure is intended to
allow participants maximum exibility in selecting activities that best t
the nature of their professional development goals.
As such, this guide contains three sections:
Introduction
This section presents an overview of the philosophy and principles
pertaining to the use of backward design in classrooms and schools
to promote understanding. It focuses on the practices used in four
schoolsan elementary school, a middle school, and two high
schoolsand includes a description of the program.
Activities
This section provides specic activities that address each key idea
within the program. The activities are designed to offer maximum exibility and customization of use. For that reason, handouts are included
within the activities to reproduce in the manner that best suits your
needs. Feel free to duplicate and distribute handouts to participants.
They can be adapted to serve the needs of large groups, small study
groups, or individuals engaged in independent study.
Resources
This section includes a glossary of terms pertaining to Understanding
by Design as well as references that were cited in the text. A bibliography of related resources also is provided in this section.
Designing Effective Professional Development
Professional development is a collaborative endeavor that is planned
and implemented by educators and administrators working together.
Educators and administrators identify specic needs for professional
development and how they might best be met. The collaboration of
administrators and teachers in designing professional development
enhances all parties sense of ownership and professionalism.
A substantial part of professional development is school-based and jobembedded. It takes place during teacher planning and in grade-level or
department meetings where educators reect on their work and solve
problems together; in classrooms, where educators observe colleagues
lessons to see a strategy in action and support and coach each other;
and in small study or reading groups or action research activities that
teachers choose to participate in.
Professional development planning is most effective when the following organizational ideas are considered:
Arrange teacher schedules to create common planning times so
that small teams such as grade-level teams, subject teams, or small
study groups can meet on a regular basis.
Use opportunities such as faculty meetings for professional development. Remember that many announcements can be communicated outside the meeting, in e-mail messages and paper memos,
allowing time in faculty meetings for professional development
discussions.
Hold breakfast meetingsin some schools, these are held
monthly and voluntarily attendedto discuss a research study or
professional article educators have read before the meeting.
Use district staff development days more exibly. In addition
to full-day, whole-staff workshops, these days can also be used
for small-team activities such as reading groups or small study

groupsor for independent work or whole-staff sharing.
Professional development is a sustained endeavor and needs to be differentiated. The best professional development is based on an analysis of an organizations needs and the choices individuals make to
strengthen their skills and expertise in support of the organizational
goals. Effective programs acknowledge that educators, like their students, are at different levels of readiness and have varied interests and
preferred ways of learning. To meet these varied needs, professional
development should be exible and approached in several ways, such
as large groups, small study groups, and independent study.
The graphic representation in Figure 1 is one way to organize groups
and content as you plan a professional development program.
As Figure 1 shows, once the entire faculty has an introduction, several
small groups and individuals may decide to continue exploring the
content in different ways. Just as they would using any map, different people will nd different routes to get where theyre going in their
learning, and groups and individuals will be moving simultaneously
through the map in their exploration of Understanding by Design.
This user guide includes ideas and resources for each of these options.
To keep professional development as informative and interactive as
possible, we recommend setting up structures for participants to share
learning with others. For example, you may want to set up public sharing sessions at regular intervals.
Large Group
Large group activities can be an effective way to establish a common

base of knowledge and a shared vocabulary among staff members.
As a starting point for professional development on Understanding by
Design, consider the following two options:
Option 1. A Linear Investigation of the Four Strands
Large group professional development can be designed and implemented using the four strands in a linear order, beginning with the rst
strand. For this approach, four or more professional development sessions can be offered using a combination of viewing sessions, follow-up
discussions, and participant activities (implemented in the order they
are presented in the user guide and using the resources presented for
FIGURE 1
Road Map Organizer
Whole-Group Workshop
Start with a whole-group

introduction to the topic.
Reading
Group
Allow many forms of
professional development
to extend the learning.
Independent
Study
Study
Group
Independent
Study
Bring the group together

at regular intervals to
share learning.
Sharing Session
Study Group
on Related
Topic
Reading
Group on
Subtopic
Allow individuals to create

their own independent study
as a result of any group work.
Independent
Study
Independent
Study
Sharing Session
Encourage group work on

subtopics or related topics.
Independent
Study on
Subtopic
Study
Group
Reading
Group on
Related
Topic
Source: Adapted from Differentiated Instruction: An ASCD Professional Development Planner (p. 5), by S. Chapman, M.
DArcangelo, L. Kiernan, and J. ONeil, 2000, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Copyright 2000 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
each activity). This linear approach is advisable for large group sessions
involving participants who have some introductory background knowledge of Understanding by Design and wish to engage in a step-by-step
follow-up process to deepen their work with it.
Specically, this approach is ideal for participants interested in moving

forward with the Understanding by Design framework beyond the level
of initial unit development. In Option 1, large group participants will
begin with an overview of the Understanding by Design framework.
They will then observe and analyze classroom-based learning activities
reecting backward design principles. Next, large group participants
will investigate the implications of Understanding by Design for school
improvement planning, including professional development practices.
Participants will then have the opportunity to respond to experts and
practitioners observations about implementing Understanding by
Design within schools and districts. Finally, participants can use the
examples as a basis for continued discussion.
Option 2. Job-Embedded Large Group Professional
Development
Option 2 involves the process of job-embedded decision making
related to professional development design. Participants can select one
or more of the strands or classroom examples and related professional
development activities specically aligned with their classroom, school,
or district needs and priorities. For example, large group trainings can
be designed using the rst strand if participants have completed an
initial investigation of Understanding by Design and wish to synthesize
their experiences and insights.
In contrast, the second strand presents a range of opportunities for participants wishing to observe, discuss, and debate what Understanding
by Design may look like in classrooms at all age levels. It is ideal for
participants preparing walk-throughs in their own schools to examine
the level Understanding by Design is being implemented in classrooms.
The third strand can be used as a focus for large group trainings involving the application of Understanding by Design to the school improvement planning process, including professional development.
The fourth strand can serve as a catalyst for large group professional
development focused on universal implications of the Understanding
by Design framework.
The elementary, middle, and high school classroom examples

can be used as a focus for large group trainings involving the
application of Understanding by Design by new and experienced
educators.
Small Study Group
Small study groups are a popular form of school-based professional

development. Although people use them in various ways, small study
groups share the following characteristics:
Participants construct knowledge through research, interaction
with selected materials, and conversations with colleagues.
Each person brings expertise to the group and makes contributions.
Participants commit to creating new knowledge and using this
knowledge to positively affect perspectives, policies, and practice.
Small study groups are a great tool for discussing and examining new
teaching techniques or approaches before implementing them in the
classroom. They also provide a forum for educators and others to
report on ideas theyre trying, to troubleshoot implementation efforts,
and to enhance their efforts as they go.
Study groups can take either a linear or a job-embedded approach to
using this program. Groups may study each of the four strands and
the classroom examples in a sequential order, using the suggested
questions and activities presented within the user guide. Or, the jobembedded approach involves study group leaders working with other
members of the group to identify specic aspects of each of the four
strands and classroom examples they wish to investigate in depth.
These aspects should have direct relevance to the focus and direction
of the study group and complement its overall purpose and responsibilities.
For example, a study group may elect to discuss the video and readings in the rst strand in one session as a springboard for studying
the teaching implications emphasized in the second strand. They can
then progress to viewing selected video excerpts from the third strand
related to professional development and school improvement planning
priorities to study viable ways to implement the teaching strategies they
studied in the second strand.
10
Independent Study
Independent study can consist of whatever viewing and user guide

activities you think would be most productive and enjoyable for your
specic needs and goals. Because independent study is self-directed,
you have more exibility in structuring it in a way that makes sense
to you as an individual practitioner. To prime your thinking, here are
a few examples of activities that you might undertake as part of an
independent study involving Moving Forward with Understanding by
Design:
Complete the rst strands independent study activities to reect
on the authors and practitioners ideas about the learning principles and evolution of the Understanding by Design framework.
Use the second strand to enhance your understanding of what
Understanding by Design teaching and learning strategies and
principles might look like in elementary, middle, and high
school classrooms. This strand is ideal for reecting on your own
instructional practices if you are currently in the classroom or
for enhancing your expertise as an administrator responsible for
classroom observations related to teaching for understanding.
Use the third strand to increase your understanding of the links
and connections between the backward design process and
broader issues related to professional development.
Use the fourth strand to familiarize yourself with experts and
practitioners ideas and reections on Understanding by Design.
Finally, use the elementary, middle, and high school classroom
examples to see what Understanding by Design looks like in a
classroom over a period of time.
11
U N D E RSTA N D I N G BY D E S I G N :
AN OVERVIEW
AC
T I V IT I E S

This strand addresses the learning theory underlying the Understanding
by Design framework. Using a combination of video excerpts, professional development activities, and suggested readings, this strand will
aid in exploring the following question: How does Understanding by
Design offer a framework and consensus-driven language for curriculum design, instruction, and assessment that promote understanding
and transfer?
13
Activity 1.1
Previewing and Postviewing
Large Group Directions

This strand presents experts Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and practitioners as they reect on the evolution of Understanding by Design.
A focus of their discussion involves the expansion of Understanding by
Design from its initial emphasis on unit design toward its growing use
as a catalyst for school improvement. As participants review this video
excerpt, they may wish to complete the K-W-L Chart included in this
activity that asks these questions:
Prior to viewing this video excerpt, what do you think you know
about Understanding by Design and its evolution?
As you observe this video excerpt, what do you want to learn
about the goals of this framework?
As you complete the viewing and discussion of this video
excerpt, what have you learned about Understanding by Design?
Are there any misconceptions or misunderstandings you have
modied? Where might you go from here to answer questions
posed by the experts and practitioners?
Small Study Group Directions
Small study groups may wish to use this strand as a springboard for
studying and investigating the origins of Understanding by Design.
How are the goals, design principles, and resources available through
Understanding by Design potentially useful as participants study and
investigate its implications for their school or district? As participants
review this video excerpt, they may wish to complete the K-W-L Chart
included in this activity.
Independent Study Directions
Individuals using this strand for independent study may wish to complete the K-W-L Chart in this activity and consider the questions listed
under the Large Group Directions.
14
Activities
Large Group
K-W-L Chart
K = What do you think

you KNOW about
Understanding by
Design?
W = What do you
WANT to learn about
Understanding by
Design?
L = What have you

LEARNED about
Understanding by
Design?
Small Study Group

Independent Study
15
Activity 1.2
Dealing with Misconceptions

When exploring this strand in a large group, participants may benet
from reading and discussing Jay McTighe, Elliott Seif, and Grant Wiggins article from Educational Leadership entitled You Can Teach for
Meaning. A major focus of large-group discussion can be participants
debate regarding the misconceptions presented in the article (i.e., we
have to teach to the test, and we have too much content to cover).
Participants can use Large Group Guiding Questions to jot down notes
and focus discussion.
You Can Teach for Meaning makes an ideal springboard for small
study group discussion and investigation. After reading and debating
the assertions made in the article, participants may wish to respond to
the Small Study Group Guiding Questions.
Participants may wish to collect additional research articles and share
them with the small study group to further the discussion. Additionally,
participants should discuss the extent to which they perceive the ve
principles identied at the beginning of the article being operational in
classrooms in their school or district.
After reviewing the article You Can Teach for Meaning, participants
reect on their own classroom, school, or district using the Independent Study Guiding Questions.
16
Ac ti v i ti e s
Large Group
You Can Teach for Meaning

Jay McTighe, Elliott Seif, and Grant Wiggins
Teaching for meaning is an engaging idea, but

many teachers find it problematic in this age
of mandates and standardized tests.
Teachers who regularly use this approach

center their planning on three recurring questions that should be at the heart of any serious education reform: What are the big ideas
and core processes that students should come
to understand? What will teachers look for as
evidence that students truly understand the big
ideas and can apply their knowledge and skills
in meaningful and effective ways? What teaching strategies will help students make meaning
of curriculum content while avoiding the problems of aimless coverage and activity-oriented
instruction?
Such an approach to teaching and learning
is more apt to engage the learner and yield
meaningful, lasting learning than traditional
Source: From You Can Teach for Meaning, by J. McTighe, E. Seif, and G. Wiggins, 2004, Educational Leadership, 62(1),
2630. Copyright 2004 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17
Independent Study
Understanding big ideas in content is central to the work of students.

Students can only nd and make meaning
when they are asked to inquire, think at high
levels, and solve problems.
Students should be expected to apply
knowledge and skills in meaningful tasks
within authentic contexts.
Teachers should regularly use thoughtprovoking, engaging, and interactive instructional strategies.
Students need opportunities to revise their
assignments using clear examples of successful work, known criteria, and timely feedback.
Small Study Group
Teaching is more than covering content, learning is more than merely taking in, and assessment is more than accurate recall. Meaning
must be made, and understanding must be
earned. Students are more likely to make
meaning and gain understanding when they
link new information to prior knowledge, relate
facts to big ideas, explore essential questions,
and apply their learning in new contexts.
Consider the following classroom scenarios
(Tharp, Estrada, & Yamauchi, 2000). A 6th
grade teacher asks students to collect data from
home on the height and weight of various
family members. Students discuss the following
questions in groups: How could we represent
these data? What is the most effective way? Students decide on specic approaches and share
them with the class. A spirited discussion takes
place on the best approach.
A 4th grade teacher asks students to
explore the Eskimo culture through research
and discussion. Using the textbook and multiple resources, the class tackles the following
question: What makes Eskimo life similar to
and different from your life? Students dene
and describe ideas about Eskimo life, using
a graphic organizer to make connections
between concepts and facts. In small groups,
they develop a project on an aspect of Eskimo
life, conduct research, organize data, and
draw conclusions that compare Eskimo life
with their own lives. The teacher has shared a
rubric identifying the key features of successful project work. She regularly collects samples
of student work to provide feedback and offer

suggestions for improvement.
These two examples illustrate a curricular
and instructional approach that we call teaching for meaning and understanding. This
approach embodies ve key principles:
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
fact-based and procedure-based lecture,

recitation, or textbook instruction. Yet when
well-intentioned teachers and administrators are
asked to put these ideas into practice, it is not
uncommon to hear a chorus of Yes, buts. The
message? Teaching for meaning is ne in the
abstract, but such ideas are impractical in the
real world of content standards and high-stakes
testing. The current focus on state and local
content standards, related testing programs,
No Child Left Behind, and accountability have
strengthened the view that we must use more
traditional teaching approaches to produce
high levels of achievement.
Ironically, a key lever in the standards-based
reform strategythe use of high-stakes external
testshas unwittingly provided teachers with
a rationalization for avoiding or minimizing the
need to teach for meaning and in-depth understanding. Teachers are more likely to spend
time practicing for the test, covering many facts
and procedures and using traditional lecture
and recitation methods in the hope that more
students will become procient.
Two key Yes, buts interfere with the promise
of teaching for meaning: Yes, but . . . we have
to teach to the state or national test. Yes, but
. . . we have too much content to cover. Both
are misconceptions.
Misconception Number 1: We have to

teach to the test.
Many educators believe that instructing and
assessing for understanding are incompatible
with state mandates and standardized tests.
Although they rarely offer research to support
this claim, these educators imply that teachers
are stuck teaching to the test against their will.
They would teach for meaning, if they could.
The implicit assumption is that teachers can
only safeguard or raise test scores by covering tested items and practicing the test format.
By implication, there is no time for the kind of
in-depth and engaging instruction that helps
students make meaning and deepens their
understanding of big ideas.
18
We contend that teachers can best raise

test scores over the long haul by teaching
the key ideas and processes contained in content standards in rich and engaging ways; by
collecting evidence of student understanding of
that content through robust local assessments
rather than one-shot standardized testing; and
by using engaging and effective instructional
strategies that help students explore core concepts through inquiry and problem solving.
What evidence supports these contentions?
A summary of the last 30 years of research on
learning and cognition shows that learning for
meaning leads to greater retention and use of
information and ideas (Bransford, Brown, &
Cocking, 2000). One avenue of this research
explored the differences between novices and
experts in various elds. Psychologists learned
that experts have more than just a lot of facts
in their heads: They actually think differently
than novices do. According to the researchers,
expertise requires something else: a well-organized knowledge of concepts, principles, and
procedures of inquiry (p. 239). This nding
suggests that students, to become knowledgeable and competent in a eld of study, should
develop not only a solid foundation of factual
knowledge but also a conceptual framework
that facilitates meaningful learning.
Data from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) also challenge the premise that teaching to the test is the
best way to achieve higher scores. TIMSS tested
the mathematics and science achievement of
students in 42 countries at three grade levels
(4, 8, and 12). Although the outcomes of TIMSS
are well knownU.S. students do not perform
as well as students in most other industrialized
countries (Martin, Mullis, Gregory, Hoyle, &
Shen, 2000)the results of its less publicized
teaching studies offer additional insights. In an
exhaustive analysis of mathematics instruction
in Japan, Germany, and the United States, Stigler
and Hiebert (1999) present striking evidence of
the benets of teaching for meaning and understanding. In Japan, a high-achieving country,
mathematics teachers state that their primary
Activities
Teachers . . . create situations in

which students . . . ask questions,
develop strategies for solving
problems, and communicate with
one another. Students are often
expected to explain their answers
and discuss how they arrived at
their conclusions. These teachers
usually assess students mastery
of knowledge through discussions, projects, or tests that demand
explanation and extended writing.
Students work on applications or
interpretations of the material to
develop new or deeper understandings of a given topic. Such assignments may take several days to
complete. Students in interactive
classrooms are often encouraged to
choose the questions or topics they
wish to study within an instructional
unit designed by the teacher. Different students may be working on
different tasks during the same class
period. (p. 12)
Small Study Group
The study found clear and consistent correlations between interactive teaching methods
and higher levels of learning and achievement.
In a related study (Newmann, Bryk, &
Nagaoka, 2001), researchers in Chicago systematically collected and analyzed classroom
writing and mathematics assignments given in
grades 3, 6, and 8 by randomly selected schools
and control schools for a three-year period.
Researchers rated assignments according to the
degree to which the work required authentic intellectual activity, which the researchers
dened as construction of knowledge, through
the use of disciplined inquiry, to produce
discourse, products, or performances that have
value beyond school (pp. 1415). The study
concluded that students who received assignments requiring more challenging intellectual
work also achieved greater-than-average gains
on the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills in reading and
19
Independent Study
Large Group
aim is to develop conceptual understanding in

their students. Compared with teachers in the
United States, they cover less ground in terms
of discrete topics, skills, or pages in a textbook,
but they emphasize problem-based learning in
which students derive and explain rules and
theorems, thus leading to deeper understanding. A recent TIMSS analysis of data from seven
countries indicates that all high-achieving
countries use a percentage of their mathematics
problems to help students explore concepts
and make connections, whereas U.S. teachers tend to emphasize algorithmic plug-in of
procedures instead of genuine reasoning and
problem solving (Hiebert et al., 2003; Stigler &
Hiebert, 2004).
Compatible ndings emerged in an ambitious study of 24 restructured schoolseight
elementary, eight middle, and eight high
schoolsin 16 states (Newmann & Associates, 1996). The research showed that students
improved their performance in mathematics
and social studies and that inequalities among
high- and low-performing students diminished when the curriculum included sustained
examination of a few important topics rather
than supercial coverage of many topics; when
teachers framed instruction around challenging and relevant questions; and when students
were required to provide oral and written
explanations for their responses.
Two additional studies of factors inuencing
student achievement were conducted in Chicago Public Schools. Smith, Lee, and Newmann
(2001) examined test scores from more than
100,000 students in grades 28 and surveys
from more than 5,000 teachers in 384 Chicago
elementary schools. The study compared teachers who used interactive teaching methods with
those who used noninteractive teaching methods. The researchers then looked at subsequent
achievement in reading and mathematics.
The researchers described interactive instruction methods as follows:
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
mathematics and demonstrated higher performance in reading, mathematics, and writing on

the Illinois Goals Assessment Program.
Misconception Number 2: We have too much

content to cover.
Teachers from kindergarten to graduate school
wrestle with the realities of the information age
and the knowledge explosion: There is simply
too much information to cover. In theory, the
standards movement promised a solution to the
problem of information overload by identifying curricular priorities. Content standards were
intended to specify what is most important
for students to know and be able to do, thus
providing a much-needed focus and set of
priorities for curriculum, instruction, and assessment. In practice, however, content standards
committees at the national, state, and district
levels often worked in isolation to produce
overly ambitious lists of essentials for their
disciplines. Rather than streamlining the curriculum, the plethora of standards added to the
coverage problem, especially at the elementary
level, where teachers must teach standards
and benchmarks in multiple subjects (Marzano
& Kendall, 1998). The matter is further complicated by teachers propensity to focus on
overloaded textbooks as the primary resource
for addressing their obligations to the content
standards. U.S. textbook publishers try to cover
the waterfront to appease state textbook adoption committees, national subject-area organizations, and various special-interest groups.
Project 2061s study of mathematics and science
textbooks (Kesidou & Roseman, 2002; Kulm,
1999) found few commercial texts that were
not a mile wide and an inch deep.
Teachers confronted with thick textbooks
and long lists of content standards may understandably come to the erroneous conclusion
that they must cover huge amounts of content.
They feel that if it is in my book, it has to be
taught. The perceived need to cover is typically based on two implicit assumptions that
we think are unfounded. The rst assumption
is that if a teacher covers specic material
20
that is, talks about it and assigns some work

students will adequately learn it for tests. The
second is that teachers should typically address
standards one at a time in lesson planning.
We know of no research that supports
the idea that a coverage mode of instruction
increases achievement on external tests. In
fact, current research suggests that uncoveragefocusing on fewer topics and core
understandingsis more likely to increase
student achievement. The TIMSS research that
demonstrated lower achievement scores for U.S.
students found that U.S. mathematics and science curriculums were unfocused and included
too many topics (Schmidt, McKnight, & Raizen,
1997). In contrast, high-achieving countries
offered fewer topics at each level, coupled with
more coherent and focused content. This concentrated focus enabled teachers and students to
gradually build more complex understandings in
mathematics, to delve deeply into subject matter, and to attain higher levels of achievement
(Schmidt, 2004; Schmidt, Houang, & Cogan,
2002).
Recent studies on mathematics reform curriculums described by Senk and Thompson
(2003) also support using an uncoverage
approach to improve student achievement.
All the mathematics reform curriculums that
Senk and Thompson studied were designed to
help students understand fundamental mathematical concepts and ideas. Longitudinal data
from middle schools show that students using
understanding-based mathematics curriculums
demonstrated superior performance in both
nonroutine problem solving and mathematical
skills. Other studies on high school mathematics reform programs showed that students in
these programs developed additional skills and
understandings while not falling behind on
traditional content.
The second misconceptionthat content standards and benchmarks should be addressed one
at a time through targeted lessonsis often reinforced by state and national standardized tests
that typically sample the standards and benchmarks one at a time through decontextualized
Activities
Implications
Teaching for meaning and understanding leads
to more lasting and signicant student learning.
Although we have made a strong case against
two widely held objections to this approach,
we realize that educators must test, debate, and
explore these claims in their respective settings.
We therefore encourage you to conduct
ongoing action research at the school and
district levels that compares the kind of curriculum, assessment, and instruction described here
with teaching that focuses on covering content
or practicing for standardized accountability
tests. Are students more engaged when you
frame content in provocative essential questions? Do students show increased understanding when they have some choice in the manner
in which they demonstrate their knowledge? Is
performance on traditional assessments compromised when learners have the opportunity
to apply their knowledge in authentic situa-
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000).

How people learn: Brain, mind, experience,
and school. Washington, DC: National Research
Council.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B.,
Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from
the TIMSS 1999 video study (NCES 2003-013).
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do
middle school science programs measure up?
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6),
522549.
Kulm, G. (1999). Evaluating mathematics textbooks.
Basic Education, 43(9), 68.
Martin, M., Mullis, I., Gregory, K., Hoyle, C., & Shen,
C. (2000). Effective schools in science and mathematics: IEAs Third International Mathematics
and Science Study. Boston: International Study
Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendell, J. S. (1998). Awash in a sea
of standards. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research
for Education and Learning.
Newmann, F., & Associates. (1996). Authentic
achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual
quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Newmann, F., Bryk, A., & Nagaoka, J. (2001).
Authentic intellectual work and standardized
tests: Conflict or coexistence? Chicago: Consortium
on Chicago School Research.
Schmidt, W. (2004). A vision for mathematics. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 611.
Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A
coherent curriculum: The case for mathematics.
American Educator, 26(2), 1026, 4748.
Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., & Raizen, S. (1997). A
splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science
and mathematics education. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Senk, S., & Thompson, D. (2003). Standards-based
school mathematics curricula: What are they?
What do students learn? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21
Independent Study
Similarly, the use of complex performance

assessments enables students to apply facts,
concepts, and skills contained in multiple standards in a more meaningful way while enabling
educators to assess for true understanding, not
just for recall or recognition.
References
Small Study Group
Experts knowledge is not simply

a list of facts and formulas that are
relevant to the domain; instead, their
knowledge is organized around core
concepts or big ideas that guide
their thinking about the domain.
(2000, p. 24)
tions? Do inquiry-based and problem-based

instruction energize teachers?
Let the results speak for themselves. We
hope that by uncovering some of these
unfounded claims, we will encourage educators and district leaders to take a more proactive stance and focus on what they can do to
improve learning in todays standards-based
world.
Large Group
items. Thus, the presentation of both tests and

standards documents often misleadingly suggests
that teachers should teach to standards one bit at
a time. From this point of view, teachers certainly
do not have enough time to address all standards.
We suggest clustering discrete standards
under an umbrella of big ideas. This approach
renders teaching more efcient while applying
a principle of effective learning derived from
research. Bransford and colleagues suggest that
Smith, J., Lee, V., & Newmann, F. (2001). Instruction and achievement in Chicago elementary
schools. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School
Research.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap.
New York: Free Press.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(5),
1216.
Tharp, R., Estrada, S., & Yamauchi, L. (2000). Teaching transformed: Achieving excellence, fairness,
inclusion, and harmony. Boulder, CO: Westview
Press.
Jay McTighe ([email protected]) and Grant Wiggins
([email protected]) are coauthors of Understanding
by Design (ASCD, 1998) and The Understanding by Design
Handbook (ASCD, 1999). Elliott Seif ([email protected]) is
the author of the chapter titled Curriculum Renewal: A Case
Study in the ASCD Curriculum Handbook and is a member
of the ASCD Understanding by Design cadre.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
22
Activities
Large Group
Large Group Guiding Questions

After reading You Can Teach for Meaning by Jay McTighe, Elliott Seif, and
Grant Wiggins, discuss the following questions.
1. To what extent do you agree with the assertions the authors make
in the article?
2. To what extent do you disagree with its ideas?
3. Discuss with other participants how the ve principles mentioned

in the article are being used in your respective schools or districts.
23
Small Study Group Guiding Questions

After reading and debating the assertions made in You Can Teach for Meaning
by Jay McTighe, Elliott Seif, and Grant Wiggins, use the following questions to
guide further discussion.
Small Study Group
1. To what extent does your school or district reect the major misconceptions mentioned in the article?
2. How can you begin to investigate and explore the strategies and
ideas presented in this article?
24
Activities
Independent Study Guiding Questions

After reading and debating the assertions made in You Can Teach for Meaning
by Jay McTighe, Elliott Seif, and Grant Wiggins, use the following questions to
reect on your own classroom, school, or district.
1. To what extent does your classroom, school, or district reect one
or more of the misconceptions presented in the article?
Independent Study
2. To what extent does your classroom, or the classrooms in your

school or district, reect the ve key principles identied at the
beginning of the article?
25
Activity 1.3
Key Principles of Understanding by Design

Professional development groups viewing this strand may benet
from referring to the key principles underlying the Understanding by
Design framework. Questions to Explore Key Principles will help
focus discussion.
Small study groups can use each of the key principles as a catalyst
for further study, investigation, and discussion. Individuals or pairs of
participants might take one or two of the principles and investigate the
research underlying those principles. In turn, they can share their conclusions and ideas with the rest of the small study group.
Individuals participating in independent study may wish to use the Key
Principles Self-Reection Questionnaire to analyze how their school
addresses the key principles of Understanding by Design.
26
Activities
Large Group
Key Principles of Understanding by Design

1. Teaching and learning for understanding is qualitatively different
than teaching and learning that emphasizes knowledge-recall learning only.
Small Study Group
2. Understanding can be manifested in a variety of ways or facets,

including students ability to explain, interpret, and apply what they
are learning as well as demonstrate such behaviors as empathy,
perspective, and self-knowledge.
3. The best instructional designs employ a backward design process,
with Stage 1 emphasizing desired results; Stage 2, the design of
assessment evidence; and Stage 3, learning activities.
Independent Study
4. Standards need to be unpacked via a consensus-building process

that determines which standards (or aspects of standards) are just
worth being familiar with, which standards describe what all learners should know or be able to do, and which standards articulate
enduring understandings.
5. Desired results should cue students into the big ideas of what
they are studying. Teachers can employ such cueing tools as enduring understandings (statements of understanding) and essential
questions (open-ended, interpretive questions that frame students
exploration of key ideas and principles).
6. Assessment, teaching, and learning are inextricably linked. Instructors need to use a combination of diagnostic, formative, and
summative assessments to monitor student achievement and differentiate instruction to promote the learning of all students.
7. Effective assessment should be balanced, creating a photo album
rather than a photograph of student achievement results. Such balanced assessments should include tests and quizzes that contain
constructed-response test items, reective assessments (e.g., logs,
journals, peer reviews), academic prompts, and culminating performance tasks and projects.
27
Key Principles of Understanding by Design (continued)

8. Effective assessment should be anchored around authentic culminating performance tasks and projects, what Understanding by
Design calls G.R.A.S.P.S. (authentic, real-world goals, roles, audience, situation, products and performances, and standards).
Small Study Group
Large Group
9. Students should play an ongoing and active role in self-monitoring

and self-evaluation. They need to use rubrics and scoring guides to
self-regulate, revisit, and rene their own learning.
10. Key instructional design principles should focus around elements of

W.H.E.R.E.T.O.
Independent Study
Students should know where they are going and why they are
going there [W].
At the beginning of key instructional episodes, students imagination and interests should be hooked and engaged [H].
Instruction should be exploratory and equip all learners for success [E].
Students should rethink and revise their learning process [R].
Students should evaluate their level of understanding [E].
Teachers should differentiate or tailor teaching and learning based
on students readiness levels, interests, and learning style preferences [T].
Learning activities should begin with experiential learning opportunities that help students build toward transfer and independent
application [O].
28
Activities
Large Group
Questions to Explore Key Principles

Use the key principles to consider the following questions.
1. To what extent are these principles operational in your school or
district?
2. Which principles should you consider for further professional development to support your school improvement planning efforts?
29
Key Principles Self-Reection Questionnaire

Place a check mark in the left-hand column if the principle in the middle column
is already operational in your school or district. For the principles that you did
not check, list in the right column some starting-point ideas for employing this
principle in your school or district.
Key Principle
Ideas
1. Teaching and learning for understanding

is qualitatively different than teaching and
learning that emphasizes knowledge-recall
learning only.
2. Understanding can be manifested in a variety
of ways or facets, including students ability
to explain, interpret, and apply what they
are learning as well as demonstrate such
behaviors as empathy, perspective, and selfknowledge.
Independent Study
3. The best instructional designs employ

a backward design process, with Stage
1 emphasizing desired results; Stage 2,
acceptable assessment evidence; and Stage
3, learning activities.
4. Standards need to be unpacked via a
consensus-building process that determines
which standards are just worth being familiar
with, which describe what all learners should
know or be able to do, and which articulate
enduring understandings.
5. Desired results should cue students into
the big ideas of what they are studying.
Teachers can employ such cueing tools
as enduring understandings and essential
questions.
6. Assessment, teaching, and learning are
inextricably linked. Instructors need to use
a combination of diagnostic, formative, and
summative assessments to monitor student
achievement.
30
Activities
Key Principles Self-Reection Questionnaire (continued)
Key Principle
Ideas
7. Effective assessment should be balanced,

creating a photo album rather than a
photograph of student achievement results.
Such balanced assessments should include
tests and quizzes, reective assessments,
academic prompts, and culminating
performance tasks and projects.
8. Effective assessment should be anchored
around authentic culminating performance
tasks and projects, what Understanding by
Design calls G.R.A.S.P.S.
9. Students should play an ongoing and active
role in self-monitoring and self-evaluation.
They need to use rubrics and scoring guides
to self-regulate, revisit, and rene their own
learning.
Independent Study
10. Key instructional design principles should

focus around key elements of W.H.E.R.E.T.O.
Students should know where they are
going and why they are going there [W].
At the beginning of key instructional
episodes, students imagination and
interests should be hooked and engaged
[H].
Instruction should be exploratory and
equip all learners for success [E].
Students should rethink and revise their
learning process [R].
Students should evaluate their level of
understanding [E].
Teachers should tailor teaching and
learning based on students readiness
levels, interests, and learning style
preferences [T].
Learning activities begin with experiential
learning opportunities that help students
build toward transfer [O].
31
Activity 1.4
What Have We Learned?

The set of ideas and suggestions presented in the Lessons Learned Outline come from a national survey and interview process (Brown, 2004)
involving individuals who have used Understanding by Design successfully in their classrooms, schools, and districts. As participants view
the program, they may wish to review these ideas from the perspective
of how Understanding by Design has evolved since its inception. In
particular, they should consider the questions posed in Large Group
Lessons Learned.
Each of the sections of the outline make ideal trigger points for small
study groups investigating successful implementation strategies for
Understanding by Design. As a whole group or via individual cohorts,
small study group members can discuss and debate the issues provided
in the Lessons Learned Discussion Topics handout.
Individuals may wish to use the same suggestions presented for small
study group activities and use the outline and Lessons Learned Discussion Topics handout as catalysts for self-reection and self-evaluation.
32
Activities
Large Group
Lessons Learned Outline

1. Experienced Understanding by Design users tend to
Use the Understanding by Design unit design as a regular part of
their professional duties.
Participate in some form of collaborative follow-up to their initial
training, including small study groups, action research cohorts,
and peer reviews.
Small Study Group
Be responsible for helping to synthesize the relationship between

Understanding by Design and other district or school accountability initiatives.
Articulate Understanding by Design as a framework or language
to describe best practices, rather than as a discrete or stand-alone
program.
Express a clear perception of the connection between design
principles of Understanding by Design and universal best practices within their eld.
Independent Study
2. Successful and sustained Understanding by Design professional

development tends to
Avoid one-shot sessions with little, if any, follow-up.
Emphasize the alignment between Understanding by Design and
other district and school-level accountability initiatives, especially
standards and accountability testing.
Involve all appropriate system stakeholders, not single groups or
cohorts.
Ultimately involve some form of professional collaboration,
including initial small study groups, peer review sessions, and
action research projects.
Lead practitioners to express the need for value-added evaluation studies.
33
Large Group
Lessons Learned Outline (continued)

3. School and district staff emphasize the alignment of Understanding
by Design with other district initiatives by
Avoiding the presentation of Understanding by Design as another
required program.
Articulating the relationship between Understanding by Design
and district standards.
Small Study Group
Using a content analysis of high-stakes accountability testing

designs to articulate areas in which Understanding by Design supports student achievement on those tests.
Integrating enduring understandings and essential questions into
district curriculum frameworks and standards documents.
Independent Study
Describing the underlying design principles of Understanding by

Design and their connection to such districtwide initiatives as literacy development, mathematical problem-solving, and differentiated instruction to ensure the success of all student populations.
4. Understanding by Design impacts the curriculum and assessment

processes of schools and districts by
Providing controlling principles for unifying the articulation of
standards and standards implementation.
Establishing a technology (via the three-circle process, which
addresses content in three ways: the big ideas, whats important
to know and do, and whats worth being familiar with) for establishing a viable core curriculum.
Suggesting tools and methodologies for unifying curriculum
design and avoiding fragmentation.
Emphasizing the need for a photo album of assessment results,
including constructed-response test items, reective assessments,
academic prompts, culminating performances and projects, and
holistic and analytic rubrics.
Establishing a coherent set of instructional design principles via
W.H.E.R.E.T.O.
34
Activities
Large Group
Large Group Lessons Learned

From the perspective of how Understanding by Design has changed and evolved
since its inception, consider the following questions.
1. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these individuals
ideas and suggestions about successful Understanding by Design
implementation?
2. Which of the ideas and suggestions presented here should you

emphasize in your school or district as you implement Understanding by Design?
35
Lessons Learned Discussion Topics
Small Study Group
1. As an individual user of Understanding by Design, to what

extent do you practice the ideas identied in the Lessons
Learned Outline?
Independent Study
2. How successfully does your professional development reect the

principles presented here?
3. How well has your school or district adopted the ideas and suggestions presented?
36
Activity 1.5
Traditional Versus Teaching for Understanding
Approaches

Ask participants to use the Comparison Matrix to address the Large
Group Comparison Matrix Questions.
Participants in a small study group can have each group member
self-assess using the Comparison Matrix. How would they rate themselves for each? Once all group members have completed the matrix,
the Teaching for Understanding elements are assigned to one or more
members of the small study group. Members will locate at least one
research article dealing with the strategy or principle they are assigned.
At the next small study group meeting, members synthesize the key
conclusions from their articles and build consensus about the implications of this activity for individual classrooms and the school as a
whole.
Individuals using the independent study rst assess themselves for each
of the elements presented in the Comparison Matrix, then answer the
Independent Study Follow-Up Questions.
37
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Comparison Matrix
A Traditional Classroom
A Teaching for Understanding

Classroom
1. The instructor and the

Frequently
content being taught are
Occasionally
the primary focus.
Never
1. The student is the

primary focus.
2. Curriculum is organized Frequently

in a discrete fashion,
Occasionally
with topics and
segments presented in a Never
linear manner.
2. Curriculum is
conceptually
organized around
big ideas, enduring
understandings, and
essential questions.
3. Emphasis is given to
covering the content,
ensuring that all
standards are treated
equally.
3. The instructor
Frequently
emphasizes power
Occasionally
standards requiring
students to demonstrate Never
depth of understanding
for key elements of the
curriculum.
Frequently
Occasionally
Never
Frequently
Occasionally
Never
Frequently
Occasionally
Never
4. Students are told lesson Frequently

objectives but do not
Occasionally
discuss the purpose
Never
or overall direction of
lessons and units.
4. The instructor continually Frequently

assesses if students
Occasionally
understand where they
Never
are going and why they
are going there.
5. Diagnostic assessment
occurs at the beginning
of grading periods.
5. Diagnostic assessment
is ongoing, with the
instructor constantly
monitoring students
readiness levels.
Frequently
6. The instructor monitors

and continually hooks
and engages students
by appealing to their
interests and learning
style preferences.
Frequently
Frequently
Occasionally
Never
6. The instructor assumes Frequently

that all students are
Occasionally
interested and engaged.
Never
38
Occasionally
Never
Occasionally
Never
Activities
Large Group
Comparison Matrix (continued)
A Traditional Classroom
Frequently
8. Students are asked to

be self-reective.
Frequently
Occasionally
Never
Occasionally
Never
8. Students are frequently

asked to revise and
rethink their learning.
Frequently
9. Students are given

frequent opportunities
to evaluate their level of
understanding through
presentations and
peer response group
activities.
Frequently
Occasionally
Never
Occasionally
Never
10. The instructor tends to

Frequently
treat all students alike,
Occasionally
with little differentiation of
Never
the learning process.
10. The instructor

Frequently
consistently differentiates
Occasionally
instruction to address
Never
all learners readiness
levels, interests,
and learning style
preferences.
11. Lessons and units

are organized so that
students demonstrate
achievement of basic
knowledge and skills,
with little opportunity
to demonstrate
independent application
and transfer of
knowledge.
11. Lessons and units

are organized so
that students move
from initial inquiry
and experience
toward growing
levels of conceptual
understanding and
independent application
and transfer.
Frequently
Occasionally
Never
Frequently
Occasionally
Never
39
Independent Study
9. The instructor asks

Frequently
students to evaluate their
Occasionally
level of understanding
Never
at the conclusion of
instructional units and
grading periods.
7. Coaching is a consistent Frequently

part of learning activities,
Occasionally
with students constantly
Never
monitored for their
growing levels of
understanding, transfer,
and independent
application of content.
Small Study Group
7. Coaching is provided as
individuals and students
appear to need it.
A Teaching for Understanding

Classroom
Large Group
Large Group Comparison Matrix Questions

Using the Comparison Matrix, consider the following prompts.
1. After you rate yourself for each element, determine whether your
classroom style is more of a traditional approach or more aligned
with Understanding by Design principles.
2. As a group, consider the commonalities and differences in your

responses.
3. As a group, build consensus about which of the elements seem to

be operational in a majority of your classrooms and which are in
need of further discussion and attention.
40
Activities
Independent Study Follow-Up Questions

1. On which of the elements are you traditional?
Small Study Group
2. On which of the elements do you consider yourself teaching for

understanding?
Independent Study
3. How would you explain your ratings?
4. Are there key strategies and principles you might use more
extensively? Why?
41
Activity 1.6
Characteristics of Understanding by Design Students

As part of this strands discussion of student understanding and its
relationship to Understanding by Design, participants can use their
responses to A List of Student Characteristics associated with the process of understanding to consider the Student Characteristics Questions
handout.
Small study groups can use their responses to A List of Student Characteristics as catalysts for discussion and investigation. Each characteristic
can become the basis for reading, debating, and investigating, including a focus on how students as a whole can be supported in displaying
these characteristics and how disaggregated student populations (e.g.,
special education, gifted and talented, English as a second language,
socioeconomically disadvantaged) can receive coaching and support to
demonstrate these behaviors.
For independent study, individuals can use their responses to A List of
Student Characteristics to reect on students theyve worked with and
use the following questions to guide them through the activity:
To what extent do your students demonstrate these characteristics?
To what extent are there areas in which you would like to see
improvement?
This self-reection process can become the basis for investigating the
Understanding by Design in the Classroom strand in this program that
deals with the three stages of backward design within representative
elementary, middle, and high school classrooms.
42
Activities
Somewhat
Evident
Not
Evident
Evident
Highly
Evident
Student Characteristic
Large Group
A List of Student Characteristics
1. All students demonstrate a clear understanding of where they are

headed and why they are going there.
Small Study Group
2. All students can explain the purpose of a particular lesson and its
key structural elements.
3. All students can describe the connection between their learning
activities and the standards for which they are responsible.
4. All students can identify and explain the big ideas and essential
questions that are at the heart of the content they are studying.
5. All students demonstrate the ability to explain and interpret the
signicance of the key facts, concepts, generalizations, rules, and
principles they are learning.
Independent Study
6. All students demonstrate a capacity for independent application of

the skills, procedures, and processes they are acquiring.
7. All students can describe, analyze, and evaluate contrasting
perspectives associated with the controversial ideas, issues, and
events they are studying.
8. Where appropriate, all students demonstrate empathy for
individuals and groups they are studying.
9. All students demonstrate a clear understanding of the criteria being
used to evaluate their achievement.
10. All students play an active role in evaluating their own performance
and its growth relative to identied standards.
11. All students demonstrate prociency in expressing their
achievement in multiple modes of assessment (e.g., tests, quizzes,
academic prompts, reections, culminating performance-based
projects).
12. All students are active learners who rethink and revise their growing
knowledge, skills, and understandings.
43
Large Group
Student Characteristics Questions

Use A List of Student Characteristics to consider the following questions.
1. How well do a majority of your students reect the characteristics
presented in the handout?
2. Which of these characteristics need additional emphasis and work?
3. How can you collaborate to improve students demonstration of

these behaviors and attitudes?
44
U N D E RSTA N D I N G BY D E S I G N
IN THE CLASSROOM

This strand provides an exploration of what Understanding by Design
looks like in elementary, middle, and high school classrooms. Specically, participants will be able to view examples of
What should students know, understand, and be able to do? In Stage 1,
consider the goals, examine content standards, and review curriculum
expectations.
What assessment evidence will we accept as evidence of student
understanding? In Stage 2, consider a variety of evidence, including
both formative and summative assessments. Teaching for understanding
means assessing for understanding.
What sequence of learning activities will lead students to an understanding of the big ideas? In Stage 3, consider the knowledge and skills
that students will need to know to perform effectively. Identify the
materials and resources that will best meet the goals set out in Stage 1.
With a combination of video excerpts, professional development
activities, and suggested readings, this strand explores the following
questions:
What can you observe in classrooms successfully implementing
design principles and strategies of Understanding by Design?
How do successful educators promote student understanding and
transfer?
To what extent can you expect to observe different levels of use
and complexity as educators deepen their understanding of the
Understanding by Design framework?
45
Activity 2.1

In this strand, participants will have the opportunity to view examples
of the three stages of backward design in various content areas and
grade levels.
1. As part of their viewing process, have participants complete the
K and W sections of the K-W-L Chart provided. At the conclusion of their viewing process, have them complete the L section,
summarizing what they have learnedor had reinforcedabout the
three stages of backward design, including any potential differences
they may have observed at the elementary, middle, and high school
levels.
2. If this part of the program is used over time in multiple professional
development sessions, participants may wish to use the Backward
Design Observation Checklist included. This observation tool can
be used to guide and inform participants viewing for each of the
three stages of backward design.
Small study groups can use this strand as a basis for multiple discussion
sessions, each organized around one of the three stages of backward
design. They can use the Backward Design Observation Checklist as a
catalyst for guiding their discussion of Stage 1, Stage 2, and Stage 3. A
major focus of small study group discussion might center on the following question: To what extent do the classrooms you observe here
vary in their levels of use and implementation of key Understanding by
Design components and strategies?
At the conclusion of each small study group session, members can
evaluate the extent to which the behaviors observed are present in
their own classrooms, schools, or districts.
Individuals engaged in independent study of this strand can use the
Backward Design Observation Checklist to guide and inform their
viewing and self-reection.
46
Activities
K = What do you
think you KNOW
about the backward
design process?
W = What do you
WANT to learn about
the backward design
process?
L = What have you

LEARNED about the
backward design
process? What
misconceptions and
misunderstandings
did you overcome?
Large Group
K-W-L Chart
Independent Study
47
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Backward Design Observation Checklist

Use the checklist to evaluate the quality and levels of use of the three stages of
backward design in the various elementary, middle, and high school classrooms
presented in this strand. You may wish to apply the following rating scale to
each element:
3 = Highly evident with effective use in all episodes.
2 = Some evidence of effective use, but some episodes need further
development.
1 = Minimal evidence of effective use in the episodes.
0 = No evidence of effective use in any of the episodes.
Stage 1: Desired Results

Backward Design Element
Elementary
School
Middle
School
High
School
1. The teaching episodes clearly

reect emphasis on key power
standards and established
goals.
2. All learners are clear about the
big ideas of the lesson or unit.
3. The instructors communicate
and organize learning activities
around conceptual cues,
including essential questions.
4. Lesson and unit objectives
clearly articulate what all learners
are expected to know and do,
with emphasis on one or more of
the six facets of understanding
(i.e., explanation, interpretation,
application, perspective,
empathy, self-knowledge).
48
Activities
Large Group
Backward Design Observation Checklist (continued)
Stage 2: Assessment Evidence

Elementary
School
Middle
School
High
School
Small Study Group
1. The collection and analysis

of assessment evidence are
ongoing.
2. Students are actively engaged
in the assessment process and
show a clear understanding
of the desired results they are
responsible for.
3. Assessments appear to be
balanced, with the instructors
collecting a range of evidence to
monitor student achievement of
desired results.
Independent Study
4. Assessment activities appear

to help students move toward
growing levels of independent
use and transfer of key content.
5. The activities presented reinforce
students ability to engage in
culminating performance tasks
and projects.
6. Overall, the instructors appear to
use assessment for a variety of
purposes, including diagnostic,
formative, and summative
assessments.
49
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Stage 3: Learning Activities

Elementary
School
Middle
School
High
School
1. The instructors appear to

use activities to monitor and
diagnose how individual
students are progressing relative
to desired results.
2. At the beginning of instructional
episodes, the instructors hook
students interest by engaging
their imaginations and promoting
their sense of authenticity and
purpose for what they are doing.
3. Students are equipped for
success via exploration and
inquiry and teacher and peer
coaching.
4. Students are asked to revise and
rethink their learning.
5. At key points in the episodes,
students have opportunities
to evaluate their level of
understanding using a variety of
modes of presentation.
6. Where appropriate, the
instructors appear to
tailor learning activities to
accommodate individual
students readiness levels,
interests, and learning styles.
7. Overall, the episodes reect
students growth toward
conceptual understanding,
transfer, and independent use of
content in authentic, real-world
settings.
50
Activities
Independent Study Guiding Questions

1. As part of your viewing process, complete the K and W sections
of the K-W-L Chart provided in this activity. At the conclusion of
your viewing process, complete the L section, summarizing what
you have learnedor had reinforcedabout the three stages of
backward design, including any potential differences you may have
observed at the elementary, middle, and high school levels.
Independent Study
2. As you observe the various classroom scenes using the Backward

Design Observation Checklist, what can you conclude about the
process of backward design as it is implemented in classrooms at
the elementary, middle, and high school levels?
3. What recommendations could you make for your own school or

district, based on what you observed from the classroom scenes
and your related analysis?
51
Activity 2.2
Aspects of Backward Design

This activity contains a series of articles, with accompanying guiding
questions that address various aspects of the three stages of backward
design. For large groups, two approaches to using these articles may be
appropriate:
1. At the conclusion of viewing the video content, participants can
jigsaw the articles, forming expert groups for each article with a follow-up summary to the large group: What does the article suggest
about key elements of the backward design process?
2. The articles can also be used as a follow-up activity to enhance
whole-group professional development. Individuals or teams, for
example, might review each article and be prepared to offer summarizing conclusions for the large group at their next training
session.
The rich variety of articles with accompanying guiding questions
included in this strand offer an ideal set of resources for small study
groups. For example, each article could be used as a catalyst for a
small study group seminar.
Small study group participants can all read the same article or rely on
individuals to serve as group facilitators for discussion of individual
articles. Use the Article Summaries to decide who will read which
article, then use the Overall Guiding Questions to focus the discussion.
The articles with accompanying guiding questions in this section offer
a varied range of resources for independent study and self-reection on
the three stages of backward design. In addition to the guiding questions included for each reading, individuals reading these articles might
use the Overall Guiding Questions for further reection.
52
Activities
Article Summaries
The Most Important Data by Leslye S. Abrutyn
By targeting an area for improvement and gathering information directly from students, this district sets a clear direction
for teaching and learning.
Small Study Group
Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding by Lorrie A. Shepard

Learning theory supports four effective strategies common to
both formative assessment and scaffolding.
Looking at Student Work by Georgea M. Langer and Amy B. Colton
Collaborative analysis of student learning can be the lifeblood
of school improvement.
Helping Students Understand Assessment by Jan Chappuis
Formative assessments promote learning when they help students answer three questions: Where am I going? Where am I
now? and How can I close the gap?
My Year as a High School Student by Deborah Waldron
A stint in students shoes helped a science teacher examine
her own practice.
Seven Practices for Effective Learning by Jay McTighe and
Ken OConnor
Teachers in all content areas can use these seven assessment
and grading practices to enhance learning and teaching.
A Time and a Place for Authentic Learning by Joseph S. Renzulli,
Marcia Gentry, and Sally M. Reis
Challenge students to solve everyday problems in meaningful
contexts, and the learning will take care of itself.
The Engaged Classroom by Sam M. Intrator
Nothing deates a teacher more than bored students. Heres
how teachers can get teens energized about learning.
53
Overall Guiding Questions

Use the following questions to reect on the article youve read.
Small Study Group
1. What does the article suggest about the connections and relationships between and among Stages 1, 2, and 3 of the backward
design process?
Independent Study
2. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the ideas and recommendations in the article?
3. How might you make use of the suggestions and ideas presented
in the article to enhance your professional activities and work with
staff and students?
54
Ac ti v i ti e s
U n d e r s t a n d i n g by De s i g n i n th e C l a s s roo m
Large Group
The Most Important Data

Leslye S. Abrutyn
By targeting an area for improvement and

gathering information directly from students,
this district sets a clear direction for teaching
and learning.
In our district, the walk-through process begins

each August when a committee of teachers
Identifying Questions, Getting Answers

Over the years, our schools have targeted many
topics for investigation. Math problem solving, for example, is vital and lends itself well
Source: From The Most Important Data, by L. Abrutyn, 2006, Educational Leadership, 63(6), 5457. Copyright 2006 by the
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
55
Independent Study
How We Gather Data
Small Study Group
The good news for educators is that more data

than ever are available to help us improve
student achievement. The bad news is that we
are often overwhelmed with so much data that
we hardly know where to begin. Were unclear
about which data to use, who should use it,
and how to use it effectively.
In Penn-Delco School District, we have
very good news about data. We use a one-day
process to gather authentic, rich data that has
not only propelled student achievement to new
levels but also transformed our schools into
collaborative communities focused on results.
Located in a suburban area outside Philadelphia, Penn-Delco serves approximately 3,400
students in its four elementary schools, one
middle school, and one high school. In the
late 1990s, while attending a regional meeting,
a small group of our administrators viewed a
video demonstrating a walk-through process
developed by Lauren Resnick from the Institute
for Learning at the University of Pittsburgh. A
walk-through is an organized school or classroom tour focused on teaching and learning.
The walk-through process developed by Resnick focuses on looking at student work and
talking with students to determine what they
can express about their learning. We realized
that this strategy could hold the key to school
improvement.
at each school reviews the data from a variety of assessmentsthe Pennsylvania System
of School Assessment (PSSA), the TerraNova
standardized achievement test, and district
assessmentsto identify areas that need
improvement. Each school chooses one such
area to tackle and develops specic questions
to ask students.
In the fall, each school conducts the rst
walk-through of the year. Administrators, teachers, and invited community members walk
through the school, interviewing every student
about his or her learning. The process varies from school to school. In most cases, the
school sets up desks in the hallway and pulls
students out of their classrooms individually to
be interviewed. A typical interview lasts about
ve minutes. All students can be interviewed
within a few hours if the school can sign up
and train enough interviewers.
The teacher committee collects the data
sheets and meets to analyze student responses
and to target priority areas for improvement.
Usually the committee meets the same day and
tallies the data in an hour or two, either manually or by computer. At the next faculty meeting, the committee provides the teaching staff
with the results and its recommendations. The
school now has a focus for the year, and teachers begin in earnest to work on the committees
recommendations. The following spring, each
school conducts a second walk-through to
determine how much growth the school has
made in the focus area.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
to this process. The walk-through team might

ask students to name and describe as many
math problem-solving strategies as possible;
to identify the problem-solving strategies they
would use for several sample math problems;
or to actually solve a problem and explain the
strategy they used.
If a teacher committee has analyzed test
results and found that students are weak in
reading comprehension, the committee might
develop a list of walk-through questions centering on the components of this skill. The rst
question on the interview sheet might simply
ask students to list various reading strategies
they use. The responses to this question alone
can yield powerful data for our teachers: Can
students list six or seven strategies and explain
them, or do they struggle to list even a few?
Another item might ask students to explain
when and how they should use particular
strategies. If students cannot explain how to
predict, for example, then teachers have a clear
indication that they need to devote more classroom time to this strategy.
Some schools have targeted the writing process. The interviewer may have each student
share a piece of writing from his or her portfolio, asking the student to explain why this is his
or her best piece and to discuss how the piece
is organized. Because our students learn that
different kinds of writing are organized in different ways, this question is particularly revealing. At one school that focused on writing, the
results of the spring walk-through revealed the
following:
Strength: All grades have improved in
their understanding of the writing process.
Younger grades are especially strong in prewriting and initial drafts.
Need: Some students still lack an understanding of the writing process. The committee recommends having the steps of the
writing process posted in all classrooms and
continuing to model and discuss these steps.
Strength: Students are able to verbalize the
importance of details when writing and are
56
able to look at a piece they have written and

add more details.
Need: Some students still associate content
with length and are vague about how to use
details. The committee recommends using
anchor papers to serve as models of procient performance in this area.
Strength: Younger students understand the
concept of beginning, middle, and end.
Strength: Students mention graphic organizers as a strategy to help with organization.
Strength: Older students understand the
importance of topic sentences and paragraph
formation.
Need: Younger students understand organization but need more practice. The committee recommends that teachers work on
paragraph development and point out organization when students are reading passages.
This list of results suggests the level of
ownership teachers have in understanding
the strengths and needs of their students. The
recommendations are teacher-generated, and
therefore teachers have a strong investment in
following them.
At Coebourn Elementary School, Principal
Don Pullano explains that the walk-through
process helped faculty members identify areas
of needed improvement in math and gave
them the tools and the ownership to address
their ndings. At a fall math walk-through, for
example, it became evident that students did
not thoroughly understand various math problem-solving strategies (such as work backwards,
guess and check, and draw a table or chart). To
address this need, the staff decided to give all
students a packet of problem-solving strategies. Each page in the packet listed a different
strategy with an illustration. Students received
instruction on strategies and used the packet
at school and at home throughout the school
year.
The staff also addressed this nding by creating word problem sheets with a blank line at the
top of the page where students were required
to write the math problem-solving strategy
Ac ti v i ti e s
School leaders who hear about the walkthrough process often comment, Im concerned that my teachers will see walk-throughs
as a threat. How can I overcome possible resistance and get started in my district? Our experience has taught us the value of rst sending
a team of teachers and administrators to visit
a district that is using the process successfully.
In our case, the Palisades School District in
Kintnersville, Pennsylvania, graciously included
us in an actual walk-through. We now do the
same for teams of educators from other districts. Every educator, without exception, nds
the experience exhilarating and inspiring.
After you take a team to visit another district
and experience the process, we recommend that
you invite schools in your district to implement
walk-throughs on a voluntary basis, perhaps as
a pilot program. This strategy will ensure that
only the most positive and receptive teachers
Walk-throughs have, rst and foremost, transformed our districts schools by bringing into
sharper focus not only what teachers are teaching but also what students are learning. This, in
effect, is a shift toward a more results-oriented
school district. A schools rst walk-through forever changes the lens through which it views
learning. All eyes are on studentsDo they
understand the goals for the classroom? Can
they verbalize them? The interviews powerfully
increase students investment in the learning
process. When a number of adults spend an
entire day talking with them about their learning, students realize that school improvement
revolves around them. In the days following a
walk-through, the excitement among students
is palpable.
Second, teachers and administrators have
gained a new insight: It doesnt matter how
Lessons from Experience
57
Independent Study
A Focus on Student Learning
Small Study Group
well a lesson plan is written or how well the

lesson is taught if students cannot clearly
articulate the lessons content and purpose.
This epiphany has transformed administrators
informal classroom visits. Rather than watch
the teacher, the administrator will usually now
look rst at students to see whether they are
engaged and actively participating in the learning. Next, the administrator will walk up to a
student and ask, What are you working on?
followed by, Why are you doing that?
Third, walk-throughs provide the most
important data of allthe data closest to the
students. The process produces authentic,
fresh, clear information that gives teachers
immediate guidance about where they must
direct their efforts. This information does not
require advanced technology, data warehousing, or advanced statistical skills. Yet it empowers students, teachers, and administrators, and
as a result, the entire school. Schools use walkthrough data to direct their plans for improving
instruction. Professional staff development for
the year is integrally tied to the walk-through
process.
Large Group
they planned to use. This practice became so

ingrained in the culture of the school that if a
worksheet or problem came from a textbook,
students got into the habit of drawing their
own line at the top of the page and lling in
the strategy they were going to use.
A third way in which the staff worked to
improve student problem solving was to begin
each math class with a Problem of the Day,
using an overhead projector to model the various strategies.
Another nding of the Coebourn walkthrough was that students lacked necessary
knowledge of basic math facts. In response to
this nding, teachers provided ash cards for
students to take home, as well as training sessions teaching parents the proper way to drill
students on math facts using ash cards.
Coebourns math walk-through also found
that students rushed when answering multiplechoice questions and did not use elimination
strategies to narrow their choices. The staffs
solution: All teachers would provide extra
points for students who physically crossed out
incorrect answer choices or labeled incorrect
answer choices as far off or off.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
participate at the beginning. They will then be

able to tell colleagues about their experience.
You should also explain to teachers that walkthroughs are not used to evaluate them. In fact,
the process will help teachers reach the goal
they all aspire tobetter student achievement.
Involving the teacher association leadership is
important as well.
Weve also learned that no matter how the
schedule goes on walk-through day, we should
never leave out any students. Our students are
so excited to participate and eager to speak
with an adult that they are devastated if time
runs short. We have now rened our scheduling to make sure that all students participate.
We have learned to eld-test our questions by
trying them out on a few students rst. No matter how clear we think the questions are, we
sometimes nd that they are not clear to the
students or do not get at the heart of what we
want to nd out. We have also developed better processes for analyzing the data. PennDelcos principals now meet annually as a
group to share information from the walkthroughs in each school so that they can learn
from one another.
58
Transforming Professional Practice

We have discovered that the walk-through
process leads to many positive outcomes
that effective schools strive to achieve. These
include authentic use of data, a culture of collegiality among staff, reective discussions about
teacher practice, a focus on student achievement, signicant and ongoing staff development, a focus on standards, increased student
engagement in the learning process, and a
strong desire among staff to nd out what
works in the classroom.
One gauge of the success of walk-throughs
in Penn-Delco School District is our standardized test scores. The trend line in every
grade has been up. At certain grade levels,
the increase in national percentiles during
the last seven years has been as much as 20
percentile points, moving us from around the
50th percentile nationally to the 70th and 80th
percentiles. Although many initiatives have
undoubtedly contributed to that success, we
feel condent that walk-throughs have been
key.
Leslye S. Abrutyn is Superintendent of Penn-Delco School
District, 2821 Concord Rd., Aston, PA 19014; 610-497-6300,
ext. 1311; [email protected].
Activities
1. Why does the author emphasize the need for gathering information directly
from students as part of improvement efforts in a school or district? How
does she attempt to prove that by doing this, a district sets a clear direction
for teaching and learning?
4. What are the contributions to student learning the author identies? To what
extent do you agree or disagree with her assertions?
5. Abrutyn cites a series of lessons the district has learned from gathering and
analyzing student achievement data. How does your school or district practice these lessons learned? To what extent would your school or district
benet from addressing one or more of these lessons more extensively?
59
Independent Study
3. How does the Penn-Delco School District use its data-gathering process to
identify strengths and needs as part of its continuous improvement process? How does this process contribute to teacher ownership of key areas of
strength and need?
Small Study Group
2. The walk-through process has become a signicant part of many school

districts approach to data gathering and analysis. What are the key elements
of this process in the Penn-Delco School District? To what extent does your
school or district model the elements of the process the author describes?
Large Group
Guiding Questions for The Most Important Data
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding

Lorrie A. Shepard
Learning theory supports four effective strategies common to both formative assessment
and scaffolding.
Some people roll their eyes when ivory tower
academics talk theory. But a good theory can
be immensely practical. Learning theory provides coherence and big-picture understandings, especially when were trying to change
our teaching practices. Learning theory also
helps us decide what to do when we cant
rely on past experience. Moreover, it provides
a basis for tting together separate researchbased strategies into a pedagogical approach
that really works.
Take formative assessment and instructional
scaffolding, for example. When you consider
the terms in light of sociocultural learning
theory and Vygotskys (1978) zone of proximal
development, theyre essentially the same thing.
Occurring in the midst of instruction, formative
assessment is a dynamic process in which supportive adults or classmates help learners move
from what they already know to what they are
able to do next, using their zone of proximal
development.
Moving Learning Forward

Present-day learning theories and research ndings have profound implications for teaching
practice because they tell us how intelligence
develops. Contemporary learning theories
including constructivism, cognitive theory,
and sociocultural theoryshare several core
principles. Most important are two ideas: that
we construct knowledge, and that learning and
development are culturally embedded, socially
supported processes.
Children develop their abilities to think

and reason in the same way that they learn
language, gestures, interpersonal behaviors,
manners, and tastesthrough their social
interactions with family and community.
According to Vygotskys (1978) cultural theory
of development, any aspect of a childs cognitive development occurs twice: rst on the
social plane in interaction with others, and then
on the psychological or internal plane. Whatever language and logical structures children
use in their thinking, they rst learned through
social interactions.
Vygotskys zone of proximal development
model explains how this development occurs.
The zone of proximal development is the space
between
the actual developmental level as
determined by independent problem
solving and the level of potential
development as determined through
problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more
capable peers. (1978, p. 86)
Learning in the zone of proximal development is a joint activity in which the adult
simultaneously keeps an eye on the goal of
fully procient performance and on what the
learner, with assistance, is currently able to do.
In the case of language development, the process is natural and almost invisible as parents
encourage and support their childrens increasingly competent efforts. Reciprocal teaching
(Palincsar & Brown, 1984), which targets reading comprehension, is an example of a formal
strategy used to help students develop their
language skills.
Source: From Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding, by L. A. Shepard, 2005, Educational Leadership, 63(3), 6670.
60
Ac ti v i ti e s
According to Sadler, the teacher could

help the student internalize quality criteria by
translating them from latent to manifest and
back to latent again until these criteria become
so obviously taken for granted that they need
no longer be stated explicitly. Sadler wanted
to develop evaluative expertise in students so
they could become procient at monitoring
their own learning. Like scaffolding, this kind
of classroom interaction can foster intrinsic
motivation as well as cognitive and metacognitive learning.
The Link Between Assessment and Research

The following four strategies illustrate the
strong connection between formative assessment and research on learning. We must keep
in mind, however, that educators will not
achieve the benets of formative assessment
for learning simply by implementing a string
of promising techniques or by using them
mechanistically. Research-inspired strategies
are not likely to be effective until they are part
of a larger cultural shift in which teachers and
students jointly take up learning as a worthy
endeavor (Shepard, 2000).
Eliciting Prior Knowledge
Students build new understandingsabout

anything from mathematics to video games
by making sense of new experiences in light of
what they already know. In this context, Tharp
and Gallimore (1988) offered the metaphor of
weaving: We understand new information only
when it has been woven into our system of
meanings and understandings (p. 109). Using
sociocultural theory, Tharp and Gallimore
developed the concepts of responsive teaching and instructional conversations to describe
61
Independent Study
Come to hold a concept of quality roughly

similar to that of the teacher.
Be able to compare the current level of
performance with the standard.
Be able to take action to close the gap.
Small Study Group
Scaffolding and formative assessment are strategies that teachers use to move learning forward
in the zone of proximal development. Scaffolding refers to supports that teachers provide
to the learner during problem solvingin the
form of reminders, hints, and encouragement
to ensure successful completion of a task. An
important feature of scaffolding, especially in
authentic, apprenticeship contexts, is keeping
the task wholecontrolling those elements
that are beyond the learners capacity (Wood,
Bruner, & Ross, 1976, p. 90).
For example, when a child is rst learning to sew or set the table, adults may step
in and help with the trickiest or most difcult
partthreading the needle or taking the breakable glasses down from the top shelfbut
nevertheless, the child completes the real task.
In classrooms, teachers help students with their
research before sending them to the library on
their own. When a student is stuck because he
or she cant nd information on a given topic,
the teacher may suggest a new search term or
help the student narrow the topic, but in the
end, the student completes the research process on his or her own. Gradually, as competence increases, the teacher cedes more control
to the learner. To be successful, the learner
must also come to understand and take ownership of the goal.
Formative assessment uses insights about
a learners current understanding to alter the
course of instruction and thus support the
development of greater competence. From a
sociocultural perspective, formative assessmentlike scaffoldingis a collaborative
process and involves negotiation of meaning
between teacher and learner about expectations and how best to improve performance.
When D. Royce Sadler wrote his seminal
paper on formative assessment in 1989, he was
trying to show why students so often failed to
improve, even when teachers provided accurate feedback. He argued that it was insufcient
simply to point out right and wrong answers
to students. For assessment to be formative, a

student must
Large Group
Terms in Sync
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
how teachers can assist learning by eliciting

students relevant knowledge.
Teachers should not think of priorknowledge assessment as a discrete pre-test
to use from time to time. Rather, it should
be common classroom practice. We should
routinely ask ourselves what we already know
that will help us solve a problem or learn from
a new unit of study. For example, with Ogles
(1986) K-W-L technique, teachers ask students
to post on a chart what they already know (K)
and, through discussion, establish what they
want (W) to learn. At the end of the activity,
students discuss and summarize what they have
learned (L). Knowledge-activation routines
like this help develop students metacognitive
abilities while providing relevant knowledge
connections for specic units of study.
Similarly, Moll, Amanti, Neff, and Gonzalez
(1992) collaborated with teachers to identify
student funds of knowledge as another way
to draw connections between student learning
experiences in and out of school. For example,
a teacher who made a home visit observed
a child selling Mexican candy to a neighbor
and developed a unit using candy as a theme.
Students studied the ingredients used to make
candy and discovered the differences between
the articial avors and coloring used in U.S.
candies and the vegetable dyes and real fruit
used in Mexican ones.
Routinely eliciting and building on prior
knowledge can become part of the larger
cultural shift required to establish a learning
classroom. In a recent study of new formative
assessment practices, Black and Wiliam (2004)
provided an example of the power of new
norms:
One class, subsequently taught by a
teacher not emphasizing assessment
for learning, surprised the teacher
by complaining, Look, weve told
you we dont understand this. Why
are you going on to the next topic?
(p. 35)
62
Providing Effective Feedback
We think of feedback as essential for learning. Surprisingly, in a comprehensive review

of feedback, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) found
that one-third of the studies showed negative
effectsfeedback about performance actually harmed learning outcomes. According to
Kluger and DeNisi, positive learning outcomes
were more likely when feedback focused on
features of the tasksuch as how the student
could improve in relation to the standardsand
emphasized learning goals instead of lavishing
nonspecic praise or making normative comparisons. In motivational literature, learning
goals refer to learning for the sake of mastering a skill and becoming competentintrinsic
motivation. In contrast, performance goals refer
to performing a task to please someone else
or to get good gradesexternal motivation. In
classrooms, the kind of task-specic feedback
that helps learning might be, Great, you told
us about the most important thing that happened in the story, or Try to give more detail
about why the puppet looked scary.
Although sustained, one-on-one interactions are not feasible in the regular classroom,
detailed studies of one-on-one tutoring can
show us how effective feedback works. For
example, Lepper, Drake, and ODonnell-Johnson (1997) observed that expert tutors are
highly selective in how they use feedback. They
typically ignore errors that are inconsequential
to the solution process, such as spelling errors
in an early draft. They forestall errors by offering hints when they perceive that a student is
likely to repeat a previous error (for example,
when a student reads a word problem aloud
with a misplaced emphasis, revealing his or
her misunderstanding of the problem). These
decisions help maintain student motivation and
self-condence during the feedback process.
Consistent with the idea of working in the zone
of proximal development and Sadlers point
about formative assessmentthat students must
be able to take action to close the gap between
their current and expected performance
Ac ti v i ti e s
Teaching Students How to Self-Assess
Student self-assessment is not about saving teachers from the work of grading papers.
When used in a way that develops student
thinking, it can be a deeply principled practice
that serves both metacognitive and motivational
purposes. In addition to acquiring specic
knowledge and skills, becoming competent in a
eld of study means learning and internalizing
the standards by which others will judge our
performance. Posting rubrics so that students
can see the features of a good essay helps
make criteria accessible, but the real metacognitive work takes place as students begin to
learn the meaning of rubric components by
trying to interpret them and apply them to their
own work. High school students learn what
it means to support an argument in a history
paper in the same way a 3rd grader learns how
to write a good summary of a storyrst by
receiving formative feedback about essential
elements and then by being able to self-critique
and check for those elements in their own
work.
Self-critique increases students responsibility for their own learning and can make the
relationship between teacher and student more
collaborative. In case studies of self-evaluation
practices in sites in England and Australia
63
Independent Study
A goal of learning is for students to be able

to extend their knowledge and apply it in new
situations. However, both research ndings and
practical experience tell us that school learning is often compartmentalized and inert. In
contrast, making connections and constructing meaning are integral to teaching for both
transfer and robust understanding. Developing
this kind of learning requires attention to metacognition. Classroom practices should include
a broader discussion of how students can use
specic strategiesnot just within the narrow
perimeters of a given lesson or set of content
and how they can use insights from previous
lessons to generate new knowledge. Students
might discuss such questions as What do we
already know about fractions that can help
us understand decimals? or How is learning
about ratios and proportions the same asand
different fromlearning about fractions?
One of the many unfortunate inuences
of popularized behaviorism on education is
its narrow conception of learning objectives
and test fairness. For behaviorists, a fair test
must correspond exactly to what teachers have
taught. However, as the teaching-to-the-test
literature has shown, repeated practice with
familiar formats reduces the likelihood that
students will be able to use their knowledge
Small Study Group
Teaching for Transfer of Knowledge
when they encounter problems posed in even

slightly different ways (Shepard, 1997). Teachers shouldnt ask students to answer questions
on a summative exam that are fundamentally different from the kinds of questions the
students experienced during instruction, but
they should foster a classroom culture that
challenges students to make connections and
apply what they have learned to a broad range
of problems. For example, as soon as students
show me theyve got it, a new question
always follows my congratulatory smile: Now,
have you thought about it this way? When this
wider range of questioning is the rule in the
classroom, it becomes appropriate to expect
extensions, applications, reformulations, and
connections on summative examinations.
Large Group
feedback is most effective when it helps move

the student forward.
In a study that could provide a feasible
model for professional development, Elawar
and Corno (1985) worked with mathematics
teachers to help them learn how to provide
more focused feedback to students. Their
feedback training emphasized these guiding
questions: What is the key error? What is the
probable reason the student made this error?
How can I guide the student to avoid the error
in the future? As a result of this more focused
feedback, student achievement dramatically
improved compared with several control
classes. In addition, students developed more
positive attitudes about mathematics.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
(Klenowski, 1995), students reported that they

came to a clearer understanding of the assessment criteria and became more reective in
their judgments because they knew they would
have to discuss how they met the criteria. Students also became more interested in teacher
comments and feedback than in grades.
A study by White and Frederickson (2000)
illustrates the power of self-assessment. In the
context of an inquiry-based science curriculum,
students learned to evaluate their own and one
anothers research by applying specic criteria,
such as the degree to which the students work
revealed knowledge of the science and a grasp
of the processes of inquiry; was systematic; was
carefully reasoned; and used the tools of science. Their judgments had a correlation of 0.58
with teacher ratings, whereas the judgments of
control students, who saw the criteria only at
the end of the curriculum, had a correlation of
only 0.23 with teacher ratings. Compared with
students in control classrooms, students who
learned to self-assess showed greater gains on
an inquiry test, earned higher scores on their
research projects, and earned higher scores
on the conceptual model test. Impressively,
the advantages of learning to use the assessment criteria were greatest for previously lowachieving students, raising their performance
to the level of high-achieving students in the
control classrooms. White and Fredericksons
students became successful in science through
scaffolding that emphasized the process of selfassessment.
A Learning Culture
Perrenoud (1991) argued that some students
will work hard and thrive on formative assessment, whereas others are imprisoned in the
identity of a bad pupil and an opponent
(p. 92). To counteract this, Perrenoud emphasized that teachers who want to practice
formative assessment must reconstruct the
teaching contract (p. 92). Our aim should be
to establish classroom practices that encourage
peer assessment, regard errors as opportunities for learning, and promote shared thinking.
64
This implies a profound cultural transformation:

classrooms in which both students and teachers
focus on learning rather than on grades.
References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must rst promote learning.
In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between
classroom assessment and accountability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers written feedback on student
homework: Changing teacher behavior a little
rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 162173.
Klenowski, V. (1995). Student self-evaluation process in student-centered teaching and learning
contexts of Australia and England. Assessment in
Education, 2, 145163.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback intervention on performance. Psychological
Bulletin, 119(2), 254284.
Lepper, M. R., Drake, M. F., & ODonnell-Johnson, T.
(1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human
tutors. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches
and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N.
(1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching. Theory
Into Practice, 31(1), 132141.
Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that
develops active reading of expository text. Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564570.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal
teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and
Instruction, 1(2), 117175.
Perrenoud, P. (1991). Towards a pragmatic approach
to formative evaluation. In P. Weston (Ed.), Assessment of pupils achievement: Motivation and
school success (pp. 77101). Amsterdam: Swets &
Zeitlinger.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the
design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119144.
Shepard, L. A. (1997). Measuring achievement: What
does it mean to test for robust understanding?
William H. Angoff Memorial Lecture Series. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a
learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7),
414.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds
to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social
Ac ti v i ti e s
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (Edited by
M. Cole, J. Scribner, V. John-Steiner, & E. Souberman). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lorrie A. Shepard is Dean of the School of Education,

University of Colorado at Boulder, 249 UCB, Boulder, CO
80309; [email protected].
Small Study Group
White, B. Y., & Frederickson, J. R. (2000). Metacognitive facilitation: An approach to making scientic
inquiry accessible to all. In J. Minstrell & E. van
Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and
teaching in science (pp. 331370). Washington,
DC: American Association for the Advancement
of Science.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role

of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89100.
Large Group
context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University

Press.
Independent Study
65
Guiding Questions for Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding

1. What are the major arguments the author makes in this article for the importance of formative assessment and instructional scaffolding?
Small Study Group
Large Group
Independent Study
2. In your opinion, how evident are these practices in your current school or
district?
3. Shepard underscores the need for experience-based and collaborative problem solving to enhance students growing understandings and abilities to
transfer knowledge. To what extent do you agree or disagree with her assertions about moving learning forward?
66
Activities
4. In spite of its emphasis in assessment literature, the term formative assessment is interpreted differently by many educators. In the Terms in Sync section, Shepard identies three specic criteria for assessment to be formative.
What are these criteria? To what extent do you and your fellow educators
actively implement these criteria in your work with students?
Eliciting prior knowledge

Providing effective feedback
Teaching for transfer of knowledge
Teaching students how to self-assess
How do these strategies align with the principles of Understanding by Design

and the three stages of the backward design process?
6. Like all the strands in this program, this second strand reinforces the power
of Understanding by Design to promote an effective learning organization. In
this article, what does Shepard mean by a learning culture? How does her
portrait of this culture align with Understanding by Design?
67
Independent Study
Small Study Group
5. In the Link Between Assessment and Research section, Shepard identies specic strategies that illustrate a strong connection between formative
assessment and research on learning:
Large Group
Guiding Questions for Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding

(continued)
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Looking at Student Work

Georgea M. Langer and Amy B. Colton
Collaborative analysis of student learning can

be the lifeblood of school improvement.
Why do the majority of school improvement
efforts fail to develop true learning communities? Because they dont adequately engage
teachers in collaborative inquiry where it
matters most: in the daily learning-teaching
interactions between students and teachers.
Our experiences studying teachers development over the last 17 years have culminated
in what we refer to as collaborative analysis of
student learning (CASL), a particular form of
learning community in which teachers discover
the relationship between their instruction and
student performance on classroom assessments
and other samples of student work (Langer,
Colton, & Goff, 2003). We dene student work
as any data or evidence collected by teachers
that reveals information about student learning.
Such evidence can come from teacher observations, student performances, writing samples,
classroom assessments, and standardized tests.
These data provide windows into students
understanding of key ideas and skills.
The idea of analyzing student work is not
new. We suggest, however, that the approach
has little potential to transform teaching or
improve schools unless educators conceive it
more broadly as collaborative inquiry, which
places the student at the heart of the endeavor.
Collaborative inquiry is most powerful when
teachers look at an individual learners progress over time; when a theoretical framework
guides the inquiry process; when teachers learn
and follow collaborative norms; and when
leadership and structures support the inquiry.
As a result, teachers discover how specic
students understanding evolves and how they,
as teachers, can promote this understanding.

The approach also encourages school policies
and practices that support learning at all levels
(Langer et al., 2003).
What Does Collaborative Inquiry Look Like?

When they reviewed student scores on the
local district reading assessments, one group
of 1st grade teachers that we observed thought
the solution to improving students poor
performance might be to adopt a neighboring
districts guided reading program. The teachers decided to spend several months in CASL
groups analyzing their students reading to see
whether the new programs approach would
address their students specic needs.
The teachers narrowed their area of study
to oral reading uency. They designed and
administered a classroom assessment to determine the students entry-level skills. Then the
teachers recorded details about each students
performance to identify common strengths and
challenges. One teacher, Sue, found a cluster of
students in her class who were generally strong
on reading rate but who did not use problemsolving strategies when faced with unknown
words. They either skipped the unknown
words or substituted other words that didnt
make sense. Sue selected a focus student,
Elena, from this cluster. Developing Elenas
word recognition problem-solving strategies
became Sues initial area of study. Sues colleagues also each selected a focus student who
represented a common challenge found in the
data, such as phrasing or reading rate.
The group analyzed a different focus
students work sample each week to learn why
that student was (or was not) making progress
in the identied area. Teachers experimented
Source: From Looking at Student Work, by G. M. Langer and A. B. Colton, 2005, Educational Leadership, 62(5), 2227.
68
Ac ti v i ti e s
The Individual Learner Over Time
From the Specic to the General
Studying Students Over Time
Analyzing a single piece of student work

provides only a snapshot of what a student
can do at a given moment. In contrast, looking at the same students work over time
enables teachers to study how students develop
complex understandings through an intricate
tapestry of scaffolded experiences. We would
all agree that it is easier to teach isolated science denitions than it is to teach the scientic
thinking outlined in many benchmarks. Collaborative inquiry enables teachers to study
how students gradually learn these complex
processes and to understand the teachers role
in promoting that learning. Because such deep
learning rarely results from a single experience,
teachers need time to conduct longitudinal
studies in which they test and reconstruct their
current theories of what works (Putnam &
Borko, 2000).
69
Independent Study
Collaborative inquiry is most instructive when teachers narrow their study to the
complexities and uncertainties of one students learning. This capitalizes on Shulmans
(1987) idea of case knowledge, the notion
that individual students are the point around
which teachers develop their theories of what
works, with whom, and for what purpose. For
example, a teacher may not store an understanding of wait time in a separate cognitive
le for strategies. Rather, he or she may store
it with the case of the quiet student, Joe, who,
when called on, demonstrated an impressive
understanding of mathematical thinking after
the teacher gave all students adequate time to
prepare an answer to the problem.
You might reasonably ask whether studying
only one student provides an excuse to ignore
the others in the classroom. Because the focus
students represent a cluster of students who
exhibit similar learning challenges, teachers can
use what they learn from studying one student
with the larger group. Moreover, periodic classroom formative assessments provide information on the entire classs progress. Thus, the
teachers theories are tentative and modiable
when applied to larger groups of students.
Small Study Group
Learning to teach is not easy, partly because

no one practice works for every student or for
every learning outcome. The challenge is to
gure out which strategies work for whom and
in what combination and sequence. Two ideas
central to this process are that teacher learning appears to proceed from the specic to the
general and that professionals construct new
understandings over a period of time.
This focus on the particulars of individual

student learning is in direct opposition to more
traditional school improvement approaches that
use grade-level averages, subgroup averages,
and item analyses to establish goals. Unfortunately, we all too often view such data as a
mere baseline rather than as a source of information about students current understanding
that can inform instruction. When teams move
directly from data analysis to workshops to
x the problems, they make three erroneous
assumptions: that all low-performing students
are struggling in the same way; that the same
strategies will work for all students; and that all
teachers need the same professional learning
experiences.
The result is that we overgeneralize and
engage in uniform instructional and professional development practices (El-Haj, 2003).
This tendency explains why school improvement efforts often fail. In contrast, collaborative inquiry around individual student cases
can and does transform teacher and student
learning. To have maximum power, this inquiry
needs to take place over time.
Large Group
with various instructional practices and analyzed the resulting student work to determine
next steps. A later assessment of the students
reading uency showed dramatic improvement.
The teachers concluded that there was no need
for a new reading series.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Another advantage of studying one student

over time is that teachers often discover gaps in
their own knowledge base when their teaching
strategies fail. This leads them to identify their
own professional development needs. At such
moments, teachers need extra time to seek
new information through professional reading, conferences, workshops, or observation
of colleagues. For example, one high school
science teacher we observed was studying how
his students learned to write research papers.
He realized that he needed to update his own
teaching skills in that area and asked an English teacher in his CASL study group to share
and model ideas for teaching writing.
The Inquiry Cycle

To portray and study teacher learning, we created the Framework for Teachers Reective
Inquiry (Colton & Sparks-Langer, 1993). The
framework combines research and theory about
professional knowledge, learning, and dispositions within a collaborative culture. A key part
of the framework is the inquiry cycle (Kolb,
1984), which consists of four stages: observing,
analyzing/interpreting, planning, and acting.
This cycle describes how teachers build much
of their professional knowledge base.
Observing
Teachers often observe a learning challenge

and immediately try to gure out what to do
about it. At this stage, however, they need to
refrain from jumping to conclusions and take
the time to see all the relevant aspects of what
is taking place (Carini, 1979; El-Haj, 2003).
When Sue met with her CASL group to study
Elenas development of oral reading uency,
she brought Elenas initial running record,
which measured rate, word recognition, and
phrasing. Sue picked this particular student
because Elena seemed eager to learn and
would try new ideas, although her progress
was sometimes hindered by her anxiety when
she felt the work was too difcult. Further,
Elenas parents didnt model much reading at
home because they worked long shifts at an
70
auto factory. Sues colleagues noticed Elenas

limited use of problem solving when encountering new words. She would substitute words
regardless of whether or not they made sense.
Elena even missed the picture clue. The group
noted one strength, however: When Elena read
the word always as away, she corrected herself
by saying all and then always.
Analyzing/Interpreting
Once teachers have observed such a phenomenon, they take time to engage in exible thinking (Costa & Garmston, 2002) by
entertaining several possible explanations for
the events. Sues colleagues offered multiple
interpretations of Elenas performance. One
teacher wondered whether the reading level
was too difcult. Another thought Elena might
have trouble dividing her attention between
rate and accuracy. Still another proposed that
Elena might never have been explicitly taught
problem-solving strategies, such as using picture clues. Her successful self-correction was
possibly due to the fact that she could see that
the difcult word combined two words that she
already knew (always = all plus ways).
Planning
On the basis of their analyses, the teachers devise a plan of action. For example, Sue
decided to do another running record with a
lower-level reading book to determine whether
the books she selected for Elena were at the
appropriate reading level. When teachers have
a fairly good understanding of the students
learning needs, they can consider multiple
interventions and evaluate each ones potential
to yield the desired results.
Sues colleagues helped her plan how to
proceed by suggesting and discussing several
problem-solving strategies that Elena could use
to improve her word recognition. Sue selected
the strategies that she believed would best t
Elenas needs and discussed with her group
how to model and teach them. After a month
of having Elena practice the problem-solving
strategies, Sue would reassess Elenas progress
and bring the results back to the group.
Ac ti v i ti e s
Collaborative analysis of student learning

invites multiple interpretations of the same
event. In Elenas case, we saw teachers share
multiple explanations for her reading problems.
Collaborative inquiry can also prompt teachers
to reconsider limiting assumptions. For example, some teachers in Sues group assumed that
Promoting Collaborative Inquiry

Transforming school cultures for collaborative
inquiry is a slow process that requires a clear
vision and a passion for this kind of change.
We suggest that school administrators and
teacher leaders engage in their own collaborative inquiry to develop a shared vision for their
organization. Without this vision, it becomes
more difcult to explain, model, and promote
collaborative inquiry.
Administrators who hold this vision often
ask us, How can I introduce collaborative
inquiry to my staff? A group session should
begin with establishing a preliminary set of
norms, such as starting and ending on time,
71
Independent Study
Learning to Collaborate
Elenas progress would be hindered by her parents limited reading at home. As they observed
how Sues modeling helped Elena improve,
however, they realized that teachers can inuence learning regardless of the home situation.
Collaboration also enriches and transforms
the teachers knowledge base. When Sue
discovered that reading uency was closely
related to phrasing and comprehension, she
shared her insight with the other teachers. Sues
group also learned new reading strategies from
the article that the reading specialist brought
in. One result of this professional inquiry is
collective efcacy, a sense that we can do it
togetheran element identied in a pertinent
study as an important variable in school reform
(Goddard, How, & Hoy, 2000).
Collaboration does not happen automatically. Many schools have not developed a culture in which teachers and leaders can safely
take risksby sharing less successful students
work, for exampleand engage in dialogue
about assumptions, beliefs, and practices.
Schools need to develop effective norms for the
groups, and these groups need to learn how
to paraphrase, probe, and question as they
engage in professional discussions (Costa &
Garmston, 2002). These skills help teachers and
organizations move beyond a culture of polite
conversation to deep analysis of teaching and
learning (Little, Gearhart, Curry, & Kafka, 2003).
Small Study Group
Next, the teacher puts the plan into action.

Sue worked with Elena on the suggested
strategies and brought Elenas most recent running record to the group. It showed marked
improvement on Elenas use of problem-solving
strategies. Sue attributed this to the modeling
and guided practice. These strategies seemed to
ease Elenas anxiety when tackling new words.
Sue also became more intentional about picking texts at the appropriate reading level.
What happened next illustrates the power
of this process to generate powerful teacher
learning. Initially, the teachers assumed that
improving reading rate and accuracy would
also improve phrasing and comprehension.
But this was not evident in Elenas recent work
sample, nor was it true for the other 1st grade
students whom the group had been studying.
The teachers began to question the relationship
between uencyespecially phrasingand
comprehension.
They invited the district reading specialist in
for help. She had the teachers read an article
that addressed their questions and provided
ideas for teaching phrasing. One aha moment
for Sue was understanding that students need
to know how text is put together to comprehend the authors meaning during oral reading.
Sue chose strategies from the article to try with
Elena, such as using texts that lent themselves
to dramatic performance (plays and fairy tales,
for example). When Sue brought Elenas next
work sample to her CASL group, the teachers
noted better phrasing and improved comprehension, with less anxiety on Elenas part. The
group continued to use the inquiry cycle to
improve other errors in Elenas reading.
Large Group
Acting
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
building on others ideas, and withholding

judgment. Following an explanation of the
inquiry cycle, teachers use the cycle to discuss
written or videotaped cases of classroom dilemmas. When asked to reect on this experience,
teachers typically mention that in the hectic
pace of their work, they rarely slow down
enough to analyze why things happen, and
they would like to do more of this.
Another way to introduce the inquiry cycle
is by asking teachers to observe patterns in
test data. They can then analyze why these
patternslow scores on science writing, for
examplemight exist. To test their hunches,
teachers can design and administer an assessment similar to the one on the test and then
analyze their students patterns of performance.
For example, some 5th grade teachers
assessed their students writing on science
concepts. Even though many students earned
the same scorea 2on the rubric, the teachers observed that one cluster of students could
express the ideas orally but could not write
them down, whereas another cluster could
write down their thoughts but could not organize them orally. As the teachers analyzed various reasons for these patterns, they discovered
that they might need to implement different
strategies for these two clusters of students.
If a school has already established its professional learning agenda for the year, teachers
might engage in the inquiry cycle with student
work samples to determine whether the strategies or programs are having the desired effect
on student learning.
When teachers are empowered by their
experience with inquiry, they are more willing
to inuence school policies and work toward
school improvement. For example, an entire
staff met in study groups during a certain time
block for a year while substitute teachers covered their classes. On the basis of the teachers
positive reports, the principal rearranged the
following years schedule to allow grade-level
teams to meet during the day. This structural
shift reected the schools commitment to the
vision of collaborative inquiry.
72
We believe that every teachers passion is to

see his or her students succeed. Yet too many
teachers attribute student failure to external
forcesa mind-set that is due, in part, to cultures of isolation and failed professional development. Schools that engage in collaborative
inquiry develop a sense of collective efcacy
that helps educators reconnect with their original point of passion: ensuring student success.
References
Carini, P. F. (1979). The art of seeing and the visibility of the person. Grand Forks, ND: University of
North Dakota Press.
Colton, A. B., & Sparks-Langer, G. M. (1993). A conceptual framework to guide the development of
teacher reection and decision making. Journal of
Teacher Education, 44(1), 4554.
Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive
coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools
(2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
El-Haj, T. R. A. (2003). Practicing for equity from the
standpoint of the particular: Exploring the work
of one urban teacher network. Teachers College
Record, 105(5), 817845.
Goddard, R. D., How, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000).
Collective teacher efcacy: Its meaning, measure,
and impact on student achievement. American
Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479507.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience
as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Langer, G. M., Colton, A. B., & Goff, L. (2003). Collaborative analysis of student work: Improving
teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Little, J. W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M., & Kafka, J.
(2003). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teacher community, and school reform. Phi
Delta Kappan, 85(3), 185192.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000, January/February).
What do new views of knowledge and thinking
have to say about research on teacher learning?
Educational Researcher, 415.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching:
Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 122.
Georgea M. Langer is Professor of Teacher Education
at Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan, and
Codirector of Colton, Langer, and Associates, Ann Arbor,
Michigan; [email protected]. Amy B. Colton is Consultant
and Codirector of Colton, Langer, and Associates; abc40
@aol.com. They are coauthors with Loretta S. Goff of Collaborative Analysis of Student Work (ASCD, 2003).
Activities
1. Langer and Colton argue for the power and value of collaborative analysis of
student learning. What are the major arguments they make for this process
being the lifeblood of school improvement?
3. Collaborative inquiry is presented by Langer and Colton as essential to the

continuous improvement process. What is this process as they present it?
How effectively are educators in your school or district currently employing
this process and the criteria they recommend for it?
Monitoring and studying individual learners over time, including their

ability to transfer from the specic to the general.
Collaboratively using the inquiry cycle (observing, analyzing and interpreting, planning, and acting).
How successfully do the educators you know use these processes? Which
elements might be useful for further study and implementation?
5. What are the major ideas the authors present for learning to collaborate and
promoting collaborative inquiry? To what extent could your school or district
benet from further emphasis on these processes?
73
Independent Study
4. Teaching and learning for transfer and understanding, according to these

authors, requires
Small Study Group
2. What are the limitations of school improvement efforts identied by the

authors of this article? To what extent does your school or district reect any
of these limitations? How could these issues be addressed using the suggestions in this article?
Large Group
Guiding Questions for Looking at Student Work
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Helping Students Understand Assessment

Jan Chappuis
Formative assessments promote learning

when they help students answer three questions: Where am I going? Where am I now?
and How can I close the gap?
During the last decade, many schools have
begun to emphasize formative assessment. As
teachers work to develop short-cycle or common assessments and engage in data-driven
decision making, they typically remain in the
central decision-making role. This approach
reects the underlying assumption that teachers
control learning. Although teachers must create
the conditions for learning, however, students
ultimately decide whether they feel capable of
learning and whether they will do the work.
Therefore, students are equally important
users of formative assessment information. The
research tells us why.
Necessary Components of Formative

Assessment
In their 1998 synthesis of research, Black and
Wiliam reported that formative assessment
produced signicant learning gains, with effect
sizes between 0.4 and 0.7. They noted, however, that in schools achieving these gains,
students were the primary users of formative
assessment information. In such schools,
Formative assessment began with offering
students a clear picture of learning targets.
Students received feedback on their work
that helped them understand where they
were with respect to the desired learning
target.
Students engaged in self-assessment.
Formative assessment provided an understanding of specic steps that students could
take to improve.
Sadler (1989) had previously reported similar

ndings. In describing the role of formative
assessment in developing expertise, he identied three conditions required for students to
improve:
The student comes to hold a concept of quality roughly similar to
that held by the teacher, is able to
monitor continuously the quality of
what is being produced during the
act of production itself, and has a
repertoire of alternative moves or
strategies from which to draw at any
given point. (p. 121)
This research on effective formative assessment suggests that students should be able
to answer three basic questions: Where am I
going? Where am I now? and How can I close
the gap? (adapted from Atkin, Black, & Coffey,
2001). The seven strategies described in the
following sections can help ensure systematic
student involvement in the formative assessment process (Stiggins, Arter, Chappuis, &
Chappuis, 2004).
Where Am I Going?
Students need to know what learning targets
they are responsible for mastering, and at what
level. Marzano (2005) asserts that students who
can identify what they are learning signicantly
outscore those who cannot.
Strategy 1: Provide a clear and understandable vision of the learning target. Share the
learning targets before you begin instruction,
in language your students can understand. For
example, when introducing a reading comprehension unit calling for inference, you might
say, We are learning to infer. This means we
Source: From Helping Students Understand Assessment, J. Chappuis, 2005, Educational Leadership, 63(3), 3943. Copyright
2005 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
74
Ac ti v i ti e s
We are learning about fractions. We

are learning to
1. Distribute to students a student-friendly

version of the scoring guide you will use to
evaluate their nal products.
4. After students have settled on a score

independently, have them share their scores
in small groups, using the language of the
scoring guide to explain their reasoning.
5. Ask the class to vote and tally their scores
on an overhead transparency. Then ask
for volunteers to share their scores and
the rationale behind them. Listen for, and
encourage, use of the language of the
scoring guide.
6. Repeat this process with a weak anonymous
sample, focusing on the same trait. Do this
several times, alternating between strong
and weak papers, until students are able to
distinguish between strong and weak work
and independently give rationales reecting
the concepts in the scoring guide (Stiggins et
al., 2004).
Where Am I Now?
When my daughter was in 3rd grade, she once
brought home a math paper with a smiley
face, a minus 3, and an M at the top. When we
asked her what the M meant she had learned,
she looked at us as though we were trying to
trick her and replied, Math? When we asked
her what that meant she needed to work on,
she frowned and ventured, Math?
Papers marked like this one do not give
students the information they need. At best,
such marks might tell the student, Im doing
OK in math, but they will not enable the
student to assess his or her own strengths and
weaknesses. You can use the following two
strategies to help students identify how they
75
Independent Study
When working with more complex content

standards that call for performance assessment,
such as Writes clearly and effectively, introduce the language of the scoring guide that the
school will use to dene quality. To do this, ask
students what they think constitutes good writing, and then help them identify where their
concept of good writing matches the concepts
in the scoring guide. If the scoring guide is
above students reading level, you might want
to create a student-friendly version.
Strategy 2: Use examples of strong and weak
work. To know where they are going, students
must know what excellent performance looks
like. Ask students to evaluate anonymous work
samples for quality and then to discuss and
defend their judgments, using the language of
the scoring guide in the case of performance
assessments. Such an exercise will help students develop skill in accurate self-assessment.
Teachers often use strong examples, or
exemplars, but avoid using weak examples
because they worry that students will accidentally emulate them. On the contrary, when
students evaluate weak examples that mirror
common problems, they become more procient at identifying their own weaknesses and
gain a better understanding of quality. To introduce work samples to students, you might
3. Show an overhead transparency of a strong

anonymous sample, but dont let students
know its a strong example. Have students
work independently to score it for the
one trait using the student-friendly scoring
guide. You may ask students to underline
the statements in the scoring guide that they
believe describe the work theyre examining.
Small Study Group
Read and write fractions with halves,

thirds, fourths, and tenths.
Read and write mixed numbers (whole
numbers plus fractions).
Change fractions written as tenths into
decimals.
2. Choose one aspect of quality (one trait) to

focus on.
Large Group
are learning to make reasonable guesses on the

basis of clues. Or provide students with a written list of learning targets described in studentfriendly language, such as,
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
are currently performing in relation to the

learning and actions that are expected of them.
Strategy 3: Offer regular descriptive feedback.
Black and Wiliam (1998) recommend that to
improve formative assessment, teachers should
reduce evaluative feedbacksuch as B+.
Good work! or You didnt put enough effort
into thisand increase descriptive feedback,
such as You maintained eye contact with your
audience throughout your whole presentation
or Your problem-solving strategy for dividing
all the people into equal groups worked well
right up to the end, but you need to gure out
what to do with the remaining people.
The quality of the feedback, rather than its
quantity, determines its effectiveness (BangertDowns, Kulik, Kulik, & Morgan, 1991; Sadler,
1989). The most effective feedback identies
success and also offers students a recipe for
corrective action (Bloom, 1984; Brown, 1994).
Grades and other coded markssuch as +
and 92%do not tell students what areas they
need to improve. Instead, such marks signal
that the work on this piece is nished.
Here are some simple actions you can take
to provide effective feedback:
After students have practiced using a scoring guide with anonymous work and they
understand the meaning of the phrases in
the scoring guide, highlight phrases that
describe strengths and weaknesses of their
work. If you are working with a multitrait
scoring guide, limit feedback to one or two
traits at a time.
Have students trafc light their work (Atkin
et al., 2001), marking it with a green, yellow,
or red dot to indicate the level of help they
need. Allow students with green and yellow dots to provide descriptive feedback to
one another, while you provide feedback for
students with red dots.
Strategy 4: Teach students to self-assess and
set goals. In giving students descriptive feedback, you have modeled the kind of thinking
you want them to do as self-assessors. As a
next step, turn that task over to students and
76
guide them in practicing self-assessment and

goal setting. You may nd it useful to have students identify the strengths and weaknesses of
their work before you offer your own feedback.
Have them complete a form like the one in
Figure 1 and staple it to their work when they
turn it in. Respond with your feedback, either
on the form or orally.
Figure 1. Student Self-Assessment Form
My Strengths and Areas to Improve
Trait(s): ______________________________
Name: _______________________________
Name of Paper: _______________________
Date: ________________________________
My Opinion
My strengths are ______________________
_____________________________________
What I think I need to work on is _______
_____________________________________
My Teachers or Classmates Opinion
Strengths include ______________________
_____________________________________
Work on _____________________________
_____________________________________
My Plan
What I will do now is __________________
_____________________________________
Next time Ill ask for feedback from ______
_____________________________________
Source: From Classroom Assessment for Student Learning:
Doing It RightUsing It Well, by R. J. Stiggins, J. Arter, J.
Chappuis, and S. Chappuis, 2004, Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute. Reprinted with permission.
To help students align their expectations

with yours, ask them to turn in a scoring guide
with their work, highlighting in yellow the
phrases in the guide that they believe represent
the quality of their work. On the same scoring
guide, highlight in blue the phrases that you
think describe their work, and return the guide
Ac ti v i ti e s
Students at the Center

The seven strategies described here are
designed to help students better understand
their learning goals, recognize their own skill
level in relation to the goals, and take responsibility for reaching the goals. By expanding our
formative assessment practices to systematically
involve students as decision makers, teachers
acknowledge the contributions that students
77
Independent Study
The nal essential step in making formative assessment work is to keep students in
touch with what they can do to close the gap
between where they are now and where they
need to be.
Strategy 5: Design lessons to focus on one
aspect of quality at a time. This strategy breaks
learning into more manageable chunks for
students. For example, suppose that students
are learning to design and conduct scientic
investigations, and one part of the scoring
guide describes the qualities of a good hypothesis. If students are having trouble formulating
hypotheses, they can refer to that portion of
the scoring guide as they differentiate between
strong and weak examples of hypotheses,
practice drafting hypotheses, give one another
descriptive feedback on their drafts, and assess
their own drafts strengths and weaknesses.
Strategy 6: Teach students focused revision. Let students practice revising their work
before being held accountable by a nal grade.
You might begin with one of the anonymous,
weak work samples that your students have
evaluated (see Strategy 2). Focusing on just
the single aspect of quality that they evaluated,
Small Study Group
How Can I Close the Gap?
ask students to work in pairs to either revise

the sample or create a revision plan describing
what the anonymous student needs to do to
improve the work. Then ask students to apply
the same process to their own work, either
revising it to make it better or submitting a
revision plan. For example, after assessing their
draft hypotheses in science, students could use
the scoring guide to write out what they need
to do to improve their hypotheses.
Strategy 7: Engage students in self-reection
and let them document and share their learning. We know the power of self-reection to
deepen learning for adults. It also works for
students. One of the strongest motivators is the
opportunity to look back and see progress.
In a skill-based course, such as physical
education, students can ll out a daily form that
asks two questions: What are two important
things you learned from todays class? and
What is one goal you have for tomorrows
class?
Student portfolios can also promote students self-reection. In collecting their work
and insights in portfolios, students have the
opportunity to reect on their learning, develop
an internal feedback loop, and understand
themselves better as learners. To use portfolios
in this way, students must clearly understand
their learning goals, the steps that they have
taken toward reaching those goals, and how far
they have come. Involving students in parentteacher conferences can accomplish the same
purpose. Students gain insight from explaining
to their parents the learning that their work
represents, their strengths as learners, and what
they plan to work on next.
Large Group
to them. Where the highlighted phrases are

green (blue over yellow), your feedback matches
the students self-assessment. Any highlighted
phrases that remain blue or yellow, however,
indicate areas in which the student probably
needs to rene his or her vision of quality (Stiggins et al., 2004).
If you are using a selected-response test,
you can arrange the items according to the
learning targets they assess and give students
the list of learning targets correlated to the test
item numbers. When they receive their corrected test, students can identify which learning
targets they have mastered and which learning
targets they need to work on further. They can
then develop a plan for how they will improve
the targeted areas. This practice is especially
effective if students have the opportunity to
retake the test.
Large Group
make to their own success and give them the

opportunity and structure they need to become
active partners in improving their learning.
References
Atkin, J. M., Black, P., & Coffey, J. (2001). Classroom
assessment and the National Science Education
Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy
Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box:

Raising standards through classroom assessment.
Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139148.
Marzano, R. (2005). What works in schools (PowerPoint presentation). Available: www.

marzanoandassociates.com/pdf/ShortVersion.pdf
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the
design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119144.
Stiggins, R. J., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S.
(2004). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it rightusing it well. Portland, OR:
Assessment Training Institute.
Jan Chappuis is an author and consultant at the Assessment
Training Institute, 317 SW Alder St., Ste. 1200, Portland, OR
97204; 503-228-3014; [email protected].
Bloom, B. (1984). The search for methods of group

instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring.
Educational Leadership, 41(8), 417.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Bangert-Downs, R. L., Kulik, C-L. C., Kulik, J. A., &

Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of
feedback in test-like events. Review of Education
Research, 61(2), 213238.
Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning.

Educational Researcher, 23(8), 412.
78
Activities
1. Jan Chappuiss three questions for formative assessment reinforce Grant

Wiggins and Jay McTighes arguments for balanced assessment and active
student engagement in the process of self-monitoring and self-assessment.
How do Chappuiss three questions (Where am I going? Where am I now?
How can I close the gap?) reect and reinforce key elements of the backward
design process?
Large Group
Guiding Questions for Helping Students Understand Assessment
Small Study Group
3. The author presents seven strategies in this article for helping students to
understand assessment and to play an active role in it. What are these
seven strategies? To what extent do educators you work with practice
these strategies?
79
Independent Study
2. Wiggins and McTighe argue for students to be clear about the evaluation
criteria they are responsible for. They also contend that students should play
an active and ongoing role in their own assessment and evaluation processes.
How do the arguments presented in this article by Chappuis reinforce their
case?
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
My Year as a High School Student

Deborah Waldron
A stint in students shoes helped a science

teacher examine her own practice.
Like countless other teachers, I decided to take
a class last fall. Unlike most teachers, though,
I chose to take a biology class at the school
where I teach physics, Yorktown High School
in Arlington, Virginia.
I had begun pursuing National Board Certication in Adolescence and Young Adulthood/
Science, and I faced the hurdle of showing
breadth of knowledge across the four major
areas of biology, chemistry, earth and space science, and physics. My biology knowledge was
woefully inadequate. Rather than enrolling in a
class at the local community college, I decided
to sit in on Allyson McKowens 9th grade Intensied Biology class.
I attended class every day, took notes, did
my homework, read the textbook, worked in
a lab group, wrote up labs, and took the tests
and quizzes. Except for my age and the fact
that I came and went from class without a hall
pass, I was a typical student. The amount of
time I spent on after-school activities probably
paralleled the time commitments of a typical
high school student. I had family responsibilities as well as a fairly time-consuming extracurricular activityI taught an evening physics
class at the local community college. My stint in
students shoes gave me insight into the challenges that high school students face and led
me to make changes in my own teaching. The
following are my observations from the other
side of the desk about practices that I believe
help create the best conditions for learning.
What Looks Good from the Student Side

Give students more time for creative projects.
Although I have fairly well-honed time management skills, I found myself starting a lot of
creative assignments for class late at night. No
matter how hard I tried, my daily responsibilities and workload kept me from getting a head
start on a pending long-term assignment.
For example, one assignment involved creating an analogy for how a cell functions. I chose
to compare a cell to a restaurant, reasoning
that just as the various parts of a cell perform
the functions necessary to maintain cell health,
each staff member at a restaurant performs
certain jobs to ensure the restaurants continued
success. Not only did I have to write a paper
explaining the logic of my analogy, but I also
had to create a physical model of the analogy.
This was an incredible learning experience that
truly taught me the structure of a cell and the
functions of its partsbut it was one of several
assignments I nished at 1:00 a.m.
I used to give my physics students a hard
time when they complained about late-night
study sessions. Now I realize that students
extracurricular and academic commitments
often make it hard to work ahead. In teaching
future classes, I plan to break long-term assignments into smaller chunks so that students have
multiple deadlines along the way and to cut
back on homework during weeks when longer
assignments are due.
Occasionally use short, straightforward
assessments. Although I believe all assessments
should require students to demonstrate deep,
authentic understanding, at times it is preferable
Source: From My Year as a High School Student, by D. Waldron, 2006, Educational Leadership, 63(6), 6365. Copyright
80
Ac ti v i ti e s
Independent Study
81
Small Study Group
treatments are available. I was assigned clubfoot and spent a signicant amount of time
researching it over the weekend. Although I
had done the research and processed the information, I didnt get a chance to actually create
the brochure until the following Thursday evening, after I had taught my night class.
That evening, as I drove home from the
community college, I continued to plan my
brochure in my head. I was tired and wanted
to do it as quickly as possible while still doing
a good job. At home, I started lining up Web
sites from which I could cut and paste the
information. After a few minutes, it dawned
on me that I was about to plagiarize the entire
assignment. When I thought about the situation
later, I realized that as a teacher I simply expect
my students to know what plagiarism is. Teachers need to be more specic with students and
provide concrete examples throughout the year
that will help them realize what is and is not
academically acceptable.
Change student seats often. Simple as it
sounds, shaking up student seating every six
weeks or so makes a huge difference in the
dynamics of the classroom. I initially knew
none of the students in the class. At rst, my
lab partners were leery of me, but over time
they warmed up to me and treated me as normally as possible, even teasing me about getting a low quiz grade. However, had we stayed
in the same seats for the entire year, I would
have only gotten to know these 3 students in a
class of 22.
My experience as the new kid made me
realize the importance of creating an environment in which students can meet many other
students. Because Allyson switched the student
seats eight times over the course of the year, I
got to know almost the entire class. The regular
rearrangement of seats and reassignment of lab
groups created a supportive classroom environment in which students felt comfortable
asking any other student, not just a friend, for
assistance. I now periodically rearrange student
seats in my physics classes; I also assign lab
groups rather than let students choose them.
Large Group
to accomplish this with simple, straightforward

assessments. These more traditional assessments
can be structured in a way that gauges student
learning and probes for true understanding. I
remember one lab assignment in which Allyson
told us that all we needed to do was analyze
the data and complete six questions at the
end of the lab. My lab partner and I looked at
each other and almost simultaneously declared,
Thank goodness! We had recently completed
a formal lab write-up on a separate experiment,
and neither of us had the energy or time to
tackle another. The questions were enough for
Allyson to make sure we understood the material and had completed the lab without drowning us in work.
Reinforce ethics and clarify plagiarism. In
early October, our rst formal paper was due.
We had been studying water properties and
had recently completed a lab on surface tension. This assessment required us to write the
introductory section of a formal lab write-up as
well as answer several in-depth questions about
our data. My schedule that week was quite
busy, and I didnt get a chance to sit down
and start writing until 11:00 p.m. the night
before the paper was due. Around 11:15 p.m.,
I thought to myself, Hey, if I dont go to class
tomorrow, I wont have to turn the paper in
yet. The thought was extremely tempting, and
I went to bed. Somewhere around 3:00 a.m. I
woke up, thought better about my choice, and
nished my paper.
When I talked with Allyson about my
dilemma, she mentioned that she always calls
home to talk with the parents of a student who
is absent the day a big assignment is due. I
suspect that this kind of outside pressure helps
students make wiser choices. Without such
pressure, even as a teacher and a supposed
role model, I made a poor choice for about
four hours.
Later in the year, we had to create a brochure about a particular genetic disorder,
explaining when the disorder was discovered,
its symptoms, the genetic cause of the disorder, how common the condition is, and what
How I Learned to Love the Squishy Stuff

The most enjoyable thing that I discovered in
my year studying 9th grade biology was that
its the teacher, not the content, that makes
the class. As a physics teacher, I had no
expectation of enjoying biology. I called it the
squishy stuff. Allyson McKowen made me
fall in love with biology. Her way of presenting the material and interacting with students
made class enjoyable. Allysons classroom was
student-focused, and her leadership helped
every student feel comfortable and courageous.
Students asked and answered questions without fear. I looked forward to class and found
myself doing outside reading in a college text
so I could understand the material on a deeper
level. I used to think that British physicist
Ernest Rutherford was right when he said, All

science is either physics or stamp collecting.
After a year of biology with Allyson, I know
Rutherford was wrong.
My year as a 9th grade student was enjoyable and stressful, and it provided a dose of
reality that strengthened my teaching practice.
Although I learned an incredible amount of
biology, I was more impressed with what I
learned about teaching. A year from now, when
Im teaching physics to some of my former
biology classmates, Ill draw on my experiences
with them that have made me a better teacher.
Deborah Waldron teaches physics at Yorktown High
School, 5201 N. 28th St., Arlington, VA 22207; 703-228-5378;
[email protected].
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
82
Activities
1. Perspective and empathy are two of the six facets of understanding identied by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe. How does author Deborah Waldron
demonstrate these two facetsand their similarities and differencesin this
article?
4. What does Waldron mean by squishy stuff? Why does she argue for the
importance of this stuff? According to the author, why is it so often missing in
students learning experiences?
83
Independent Study
3. How do Waldrons conclusions reect the recommendations and strategies

presented in the Understanding by Design framework?
Small Study Group
2. As the author presents her portrait of a stint in students shoes, what are her
major recommendations and conclusions about the student side of the story?
Large Group
Guiding Questions for My Year as a High School Student
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Seven Practices for Effective Learning

Jay McTighe and Ken OConnor
Teachers in all content areas can use these

seven assessment and grading practices to
enhance learning and teaching.
Classroom assessment and grading practices
have the potential not only to measure and
report learning but also to promote it. Indeed,
recent research has documented the benets
of regular use of diagnostic and formative
assessments as feedback for learning (Black,
Harrison, Lee, Marshall, & Wiliam, 2004). Like
successful athletic coaches, the best teachers
recognize the importance of ongoing assessments and continual adjustments on the part
of both teacher and student as the means to
achieve maximum performance. Unlike the
external standardized tests that feature so
prominently on the school landscape these
days, well-designed classroom assessment
and grading practices can provide the kind of
specic, personalized, and timely information
needed to guide both learning and teaching.
Classroom assessments fall into three categories, each serving a different purpose. Summative assessments summarize what students
have learned at the conclusion of an instructional segment. These assessments tend to be
evaluative, and teachers typically encapsulate
and report assessment results as a score or a
grade. Familiar examples of summative assessments include tests, performance tasks, nal
exams, culminating projects, and work portfolios. Evaluative assessments command the
attention of students and parents because their
results typically count and appear on report
cards and transcripts. But by themselves, summative assessments are insufcient tools for
maximizing learning. Waiting until the end of a

teaching period to nd out how well students
have learned is simply too late.
Two other classroom assessment categories
diagnostic and formativeprovide fuel for
the teaching and learning engine by offering
descriptive feedback along the way. Diagnostic
assessmentssometimes known as preassessmentstypically precede instruction.
Teachers use them to check students prior
knowledge and skill levels, identify student
misconceptions, prole learners interests, and
reveal learning-style preferences. Diagnostic assessments provide information to assist
teacher planning and guide differentiated
instruction. Examples of diagnostic assessments
include prior knowledge and skill checks and
interest or learning preference surveys. Because
pre-assessments serve diagnostic purposes,
teachers normally dont grade the results.
Formative assessments occur concurrently
with instruction. These ongoing assessments
provide specic feedback to teachers and
students for the purpose of guiding teaching
to improve learning. Formative assessments
include both formal and informal methods,
such as ungraded quizzes, oral questioning,
teacher observations, draft work, think-alouds,
student-constructed concept maps, learning
logs, and portfolio reviews. Although teachers may record the results of formative assessments, we shouldnt factor these results into
summative evaluation and grading.
Keeping these three categories of classroom
assessment in mind, let us consider seven specic assessment and grading practices that can
enhance teaching and learning.
Source: From Seven Practices for Effective Learning, by J. McTighe and K. OConnor, 2005, Educational Leadership, 63(3),
1017. Copyright 2005 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
84
Ac ti v i ti e s
A high school language arts teacher distributes

a summary of the summative performance task
that students will complete during the unit on
research, including the rubric for judging the
performances quality. In addition, she shows
examples of student work products collected
from previous years (with student names
removed) to illustrate criteria and performance
levels. Throughout the unit, the teacher uses the
student examples and the criteria in the rubric
to help students better understand the nature of
high-quality work and to support her teaching
of research skills and report writing.
A second assessment practice that supports
learning involves presenting evaluative criteria and models of work that illustrate different levels of quality. Unlike selected-response
or short-answer tests, authentic performance
assessments are typically open-ended and do
not yield a single, correct answer or solution
process. Consequently, teachers cannot score
85
Independent Study
Practice 2: Show criteria and

models in advance.
Small Study Group
On the rst day of a three-week unit on nutrition, a middle school teacher describes to
students the two summative assessments that
she will use. One assessment is a multiple-choice
test examining student knowledge of various
nutrition facts and such basic skills as analyzing nutrition labels. The second assessment is
an authentic performance task in which each
student designs a menu plan for an upcoming
two-day trip to an outdoor education facility.
The menu plan must provide well-balanced and
nutritious meals and snacks.
The current emphasis on established content
standards has focused teaching on designated
knowledge and skills. To avoid the danger of
viewing the standards and benchmarks as inert
content to cover, educators should frame the
standards and benchmarks in terms of desired
performances and ensure that the performances
are as authentic as possible. Teachers should
then present the summative performance
assessment tasks to students at the beginning
of a new unit or course.
This practice has three virtues. First, the
summative assessments clarify the targeted
standards and benchmarks for teachers and
learners. In standards-based education, the rubber meets the road with assessments because
they dene the evidence that will determine
whether or not students have learned the
content standards and benchmarks. The nutrition vignette is illustrative: By knowing what
the culminating assessments will be, students
are better able to focus on what the teachers expect them to learn (information about
healthy eating) and on what they will be
expected to do with that knowledge (develop a
nutritious meal plan).
Second, the performance assessment tasks
yield evidence that reveals understanding.
When we call for authentic application, we do
not mean recall of basic facts or mechanical
plug-ins of a memorized formula. Rather, we
want students to transfer knowledgeto use
what they know in a new situation. Teachers
should set up realistic, authentic contexts for

assessment that enable students to apply their
learning thoughtfully and exibly, thereby demonstrating their understanding of the content
standards.
Third, presenting the authentic performance
tasks at the beginning of a new unit or course
provides a meaningful learning goal for students. Consider a sports analogy. Coaches routinely conduct practice drills that both develop
basic skills and purposefully point toward
performance in the game. Too often, classroom
instruction and assessment overemphasize
decontextualized drills and provide too few
opportunities for students to actually play the
game. How many soccer players would practice corner kicks or run exhausting wind sprints
if they werent preparing for the upcoming
game? How many competitive swimmers would
log endless laps if there were no future swim
meets? Authentic performance tasks provide a
worthy goal and help learners see a reason for
their learning.
Large Group
Practice 1: Use summative assessments to

frame meaningful performance goals.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
student responses using an answer key or a

Scantron machine. They need to evaluate products and performances on the basis of explicitly
dened performance criteria.
A rubric is a widely used evaluation tool
consisting of criteria, a measurement scale (a
4-point scale, for example), and descriptions of
the characteristics for each score point. Welldeveloped rubrics communicate the important
dimensions, or elements of quality, in a product or performance and guide educators in
evaluating student work. When a department
or grade-level teamor better yet, an entire
school or districtuses common rubrics, evaluation results are more consistent because the
performance criteria dont vary from teacher to
teacher or from school to school.
Rubrics also benet students. When students
know the criteria in advance of their performance, they have clear goals for their work.
Because well-dened criteria provide a clear
description of quality performance, students
dont need to guess what is most important or
how teachers will judge their work.
Providing a rubric to students in advance
of the assessment is a necessary, but often
insufcient, condition to support their learning. Although experienced teachers have a
clear conception of what they mean by quality work, students dont necessarily have the
same understanding. Learners are more likely
to understand feedback and evaluations when
teachers show several examples that display
both excellent and weak work. These models
help translate the rubrics abstract language into
more specic, concrete, and understandable
terms.
Some teachers express concern that students will simply copy or imitate the example.
A related worry is that showing an excellent
model (sometimes known as an exemplar)
will stultify student creativity. We have found
that providing multiple models helps avoid
these potential problems. When students see
several exemplars showing how different
students achieved high-level performance in
unique ways, they are less likely to follow a
86
cookie-cutter approach. In addition, when students study and compare examples ranging in
qualityfrom very strong to very weakthey
are better able to internalize the differences.
The models enable students to more accurately
self-assess and improve their work before turning it in to the teacher.
Practice 3: Assess before teaching.

Before beginning instruction on the ve senses,
a kindergarten teacher asks each student to
draw a picture of the body parts related to the
various senses and show what each part does.
She models the process by drawing an eye on the
chalkboard. The eye helps us see things around
us, she points out. As students draw, the teacher
circulates around the room, stopping to ask
clarifying questions (I see youve drawn a nose.
What does the nose help us do?). On the basis
of what she learns about her students from this
diagnostic pre-test, she divides the class into
two groups for differentiated instruction. At the
conclusion of the unit, the teacher asks students
to do another drawing, which she collects and
compares with their original pre-test as evidence
of their learning.
Diagnostic assessment is as important to
teaching as a physical exam is to prescribing
an appropriate medical regimen. At the outset
of any unit of study, certain students are likely
to have already mastered some of the skills that
the teacher is about to introduce, and others
may already understand key concepts. Some
students are likely to be decient in prerequisite skills or harbor misconceptions. Armed
with this diagnostic information, a teacher gains
greater insight into what to teach, by knowing
what skill gaps to address or by skipping material previously mastered; into how to teach, by
using grouping options and initiating activities
based on preferred learning styles and interests;
and into how to connect the content to students interests and talents.
Teachers can use a variety of practical
pre-assessment strategies, including pre-tests
of content knowledge, skills checks, concept
maps, drawings, and K-W-L (Know-Want to
Ac ti v i ti e s
87
Independent Study
As part of a culminating assessment for a

major unit on their states history and geography, a class of 4th graders must contribute to
a classroom museum display. The displays are
designed to provide answers to the units essential question: How do geography, climate, and
natural resources inuence lifestyle, economy,
and culture? Parents and students from other
classrooms will view the display. Students have
some choice about the specic products they
will develop, which enables them to work to
their strengths. Regardless of students chosen
products, the teacher uses a common rubric
to evaluate every project. The resulting class
museum contains a wide variety of unique and
informative products that demonstrate learning.
Responsiveness in assessment is as important as it is in teaching. Students differ not
only in how they prefer to take in and process
information but also in how they best demonstrate their learning. Some students need to
do; others thrive on oral explanations. Some
Small Study Group
Practice 4: Offer appropriate choices.
students excel at creating visual representations; others are adept at writing. To make
valid inferences about learning, teachers need
to allow students to work to their strengths. A
standardized approach to classroom assessment
may be efcient, but it is not fair because any
chosen format will favor some students and
penalize others.
Assessment becomes responsive when
students are given appropriate options for
demonstrating knowledge, skills, and understanding. Allow choicesbut always with the
intent of collecting needed and appropriate
evidence based on goals. In the example of the
4th grade museum display project, the teacher
wants students to demonstrate their understanding of the relationship between geography and
economy. This could be accomplished through
a newspaper article, a concept web, a PowerPoint presentation, a comparison chart, or a
simulated radio interview with an expert. Learners often put forth greater effort and produce
higher-quality work when given such a variety
of choices. The teacher will judge these products using a three-trait rubric that focuses on
accuracy of content, clarity and thoroughness of
explanation, and overall product quality.
We offer three cautions. First, teachers need
to collect appropriate evidence of learning on
the basis of goals rather than simply offer a
cool menu of assessment choices. If a content standard calls for prociency in written
or oral presentations, it would be inappropriate to provide performance options other than
those involving writing or speaking, except in
the case of students for whom such goals are
clearly inappropriate (a newly arrived English
language learner, for example). Second, the
options must be worth the time and energy
required. It would be inefcient to have students develop an elaborate three-dimensional
display or an animated PowerPoint presentation
for content that a multiple-choice quiz could
easily assess. In the folksy words of a teacher
friend, With performance assessments, the
juice must be worth the squeeze. Third, teachers have only so much time and energy, so
Large Group
learn-Learn) charts. Powerful pre-assessment

has the potential to address a worrisome
phenomenon reported in a growing body of
literature (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999;
Gardner, 1991): A sizeable number of students
come into school with misconceptions about
subject matter (thinking that a heavier object
will drop faster than a lighter one, for example)
and about themselves as learners (assuming that they cant and never will be able to
draw, for example). If teachers dont identify
and confront these misconceptions, they will
persist even in the face of good teaching. To
uncover existing misconceptions, teachers can
use a short, nongraded true-false diagnostic
quiz that includes several potential misconceptions related to the targeted learning. Student
responses will signal any prevailing misconceptions, which the teacher can then address
through instruction. In the future, the growing
availability of portable, electronic studentresponse systems will enable educators to
obtain this information instantaneously.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
they must be judicious in determining when it

is important to offer product and performance
options. They need to strike a healthy balance between a single assessment path and a
plethora of choices.
Practice 5: Provide feedback early and often.

Middle school students are learning watercolor
painting techniques. The art teacher models
proper technique for mixing and applying the
colors, and the students begin working. As they
paint, the teacher provides feedback both to
individual students and to the class as a whole.
She targets common mistakes, such as using too
much paint and not enough water, a practice
that reduces the desired transparency effect.
Beneting from continual feedback from the
teacher, students experiment with the medium
on small sheets of paper. The next class provides
additional opportunities to apply various watercolor techniques to achieve such effects as color
blending and soft edges. The class culminates in
an informal peer feedback session. Skill development and renement result from the combined
effects of direct instruction, modeling, and
opportunities to practice guided by ongoing
feedback.
It is often said that feedback is the breakfast
of champions. All kinds of learning, whether on
the practice eld or in the classroom, require
feedback based on formative assessments.
Ironically, the quality feedback necessary to
enhance learning is limited or nonexistent in
many classrooms.
To serve learning, feedback must meet four
criteria: It must be timely, specic, understandable to the receiver, and formed to allow for
self-adjustment on the students part (Wiggins,
1998). First, feedback on strengths and weaknesses needs to be prompt for the learner to
improve. Waiting three weeks to nd out how
you did on a test will not help your learning.
In addition, specicity is key to helping
students understand both their strengths and
the areas in which they can improve. Too
88
many educators consider grades and scores as

feedback when, in fact, they fail the specicity
test. Pinning a letter (B-) or a number (82%) on
a students work is no more helpful than such
comments as Nice job or You can do better.
Although good grades and positive remarks
may feel good, they do not advance learning.
Specic feedback sounds different, as in this
example:
Your research paper is generally
well organized and contains a great
deal of information on your topic.
You used multiple sources and documented them correctly. However,
your paper lacks a clear conclusion,
and you never really answered your
basic research question.
Sometimes the language in a rubric is lost on
a student. Exactly what does well organized
or sophisticated reasoning mean? Kid language rubrics can make feedback clearer and
more comprehensible. For instance, instead of
saying, Document your reasoning process, a
teacher might say, Show your work in a stepby-step manner so the reader can see what you
were thinking.
Heres a simple, straightforward test for a
feedback system: Can learners tell specically
from the given feedback what they have done
well and what they could do next time to
improve? If not, then the feedback is not specic or understandable enough for the learner.
Finally, the learner needs opportunities to
act on the feedbackto rene, revise, practice,
and retry. Writers rarely compose a perfect
manuscript on the rst try, which is why the
writing process stresses cycles of drafting, feedback, and revision as the route to excellence.
Not surprisingly, the best feedback often surfaces in the performance-based subjectssuch
as art, music, and physical educationand in
extracurricular activities, such as band and athletics. Indeed, the essence of coaching involves
ongoing assessment and feedback.
Ac ti v i ti e s
What aspect of your work was most

effective?
What aspect of your work was least
effective?
What specic action or actions will
improve your performance?
What will you do differently next time?
Figure 1. Analytic Rubric for Graphic Display of Data

Analytic Rubric for Graphic Display of Data
Title
Labels
Accuracy
Neatness
The graph contains a title

that clearly tells what the
data show.
All parts of the graph (units

of measurement, rows,
etc.) are correctly labeled.
All data are accurately represented on the graph.
The graph is very neat

and easy to read.
The graph contains a title

that suggests what the
data show.
Some parts of the graph

are inaccurately labeled.
Data representation contains minor errors.
The title does not reflect

what the data show OR
the title is missing.
The graph is incorrectly

labeled OR labels are
missing.
The graph is generally

neat and readable.
The data are inaccurately

represented, contain
major errors, OR are
missing.
The graph is sloppy and

difficult to read.
Comments: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Goals/Actions: __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Source: From The Understanding by Design Professional Development Workbook (p. 183), by J. McTighe and G. Wiggins, 2004, Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
89
Independent Study
Questions like these help focus student

reection and planning. Over time, students
assume greater responsibility for enacting these
processes independently.
Educators who provide regular opportunities
for learners to self-assess and set goals often
Small Study Group
Before turning in their science lab reports, students review their work against a list of explicit
criteria. On the basis of their self-assessments, a
number of students make revisions to improve
their reports before handing them in. Their
teacher observes that the overall quality of the
lab reports has improved.
The most effective learners set personal
learning goals, employ proven strategies,
and self-assess their work. Teachers help cultivate such habits of mind by modeling selfassessment and goal setting and by expecting
students to apply these habits regularly.
Rubrics can help students become more
effective at honest self-appraisal and productive self-improvement. In the rubric in Figure
1, students verify that they have met a specic
criterionfor a title, for exampleby placing a check in the lower left-hand square of
the applicable box. The teacher then uses the
square on the right side for his or her evaluation. Ideally, the two judgments should match.
If not, the discrepancy raises an opportunity to
discuss the criteria, expectations, and performance standards. Over time, teacher and
Large Group
student judgments tend to align. In fact, it is

not unusual for students to be harder on themselves than the teacher is.
The rubric also includes space for feedback comments and student goals and action
steps. Consequently, the rubric moves from
being simply an evaluation tool for pinning a
number on students to a practical and robust
vehicle for feedback, self-assessment, and goal
setting.
Initially, the teacher models how to selfassess, set goals, and plan improvements by
asking such prompting questions as,
Practice 6: Encourage self-assessment

and goal setting.
Large Group
report a change in the classroom culture. As

one teacher put it,
My students have shifted from asking, What did I get? or What are
you going to give me? to becoming
increasingly capable of knowing
how they are doing and what they
need to do to improve.
Pams ultimate success because it does not give

appropriate recognition to the realor most
currentlevel of achievement.
Figure 2. Student Learning Curves
FIGURE 2. Student Learning Curves
Bob
Independent Study
A driver education student fails his driving

test the rst time, but he immediately books an
appointment to retake the test one week later. He
passes on his second attempt because he successfully demonstrates the requisite knowledge and
skills. The driving examiner does not average
the rst performance with the second, nor does
the new license indicate that the driver passed
on the second attempt.
This vignette reveals an important principle
in classroom assessment, grading, and reporting: New evidence of achievement should
replace old evidence. Classroom assessments
and grading should focus on how wellnot on
whenthe student mastered the designated
knowledge and skill.
Consider the learning curves of four students
in terms of a specied learning goal (see g. 2).
Bob already possesses the targeted knowledge
and skill and doesnt need instruction for this
particular goal. Gwen arrives with substantial
knowledge and skill but has room to improve.
Roger and Pam are true novices who demonstrate a high level of achievement by the end of
the instructional segment as a result of effective
teaching and diligent learning. If their schools
grading system truly documented learning, all
these students would receive the same grade
because they all achieved the desired results
over time. Roger and Pam would receive lower
grades than Bob and Gwen, however, if the
teacher factored their earlier performances into
the nal evaluation. This practice, which is
typical of the grading approach used in many
classrooms, would misrepresent Roger and
90
Gwen
Amount of Learning
Small Study Group
Practice 7: Allow new evidence of achievement to replace old evidence.
Roger
Pam
Duration
Represents several (2 or 3) pieces of evidence.
Copyright Ken OConnor. Reprinted with permission.
Four students master a given learning goal by the end of an instructional

segment but have vastly different learning curves.
Two concerns may arise when teachers

provide students with multiple opportunities
to demonstrate their learning. Students may
not take the rst attempt seriously once they
realize theyll have a second chance. In addition, teachers often become overwhelmed by
the logistical challenges of providing multiple
opportunities. To make this approach effective, teachers need to require their students
to provide some evidence of the corrective
action they will takesuch as engaging in peer
coaching, revising their report, or practicing the
needed skill in a given waybefore embarking
on their second chance.
As students work to achieve clearly dened
learning goals and produce evidence of their
achievement, they need to know that teachers will not penalize them for either their lack
of knowledge at the beginning of a course of
study or their initial attempts at skill mastery.
Ac ti v i ti e s
Motivated to Learn
Task claritywhen they clearly understand

the learning goal and know how teachers
will evaluate their learning (Practices 1
and 2).
Relevancewhen they think the learning
goals and assessments are meaningful and
worth learning (Practice 1).
Potential for successwhen they believe
they can successfully learn and meet the
evaluative expectations (Practices 37).
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box:
Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi
Delta Kappan, 86(1), 821.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R.
(Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind,
experience, and school. Washington, DC: National
Research Council.
Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. New York:
BasicBooks.
Marzano, R. (1992). A different kind of classroom:
Teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria,
VA: ASCD.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing
assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jay McTighe ([email protected]) is coauthor of The Understanding by Design series (ASCD, 1998, 1999, 2000,
2004, 2005). Ken OConnor is author of How to Grade for
Learning: Linking Grades to Standards (Corwin, 2002).
91
Independent Study
References
Small Study Group
The assessment strategies that we have

described address three factors that inuence student motivation to learn (Marzano,
1992). Students are more likely to put forth the
required effort when there is
By using these seven assessment and grading practices, all teachers can enhance learning
in their classrooms.
Large Group
Allowing new evidence to replace old conveys

an important message to studentsthat teachers care about their successful learning, not
merely their grades.
Guiding Questions for Seven Practices of Effective Learning

1. In this article, Jay McTighe and Ken OConnor powerfully afrm the Understanding by Design assertion that there is a fundamental connection between
effective assessment and effective teaching and learning. To what extent do
you agree with their argument?
Small Study Group
Large Group
Independent Study
2. Like many of the authors whose articles are presented in this activity,
McTighe and OConnor revisit and reinforce the three major purposes of
assessment: diagnostic, formative, and summative. How successfully do the
educators in your school or district address these three interrelated processes?
3. Virtually all the authors presented in this activity argue for the need to have
students self-assess and set personal goals for learning. How do McTighe
and OConnor argue for these processes? In your opinion, why are these
processes underused in many school settings?
For further exploration:

For large groups and small study groups, use the seven practices presented in
the article for a jigsaw activity in which expert groups discuss and report to the
full group their conclusions about the particular practice their group is assigned.
In an independent study situation, use the seven practices as starting points for
self-reection and assessment of current assessment practices in your school or
district.
92
Ac ti v i ti e s
U n d e r s t a n d i n g by De s i g n i n th e C l a s s roo m
Large Group
A Time and a Place for Authentic Learning

Joseph S. Renzulli, Marcia Gentry, and Sally M. Reis
Challenge students to solve everyday problems in meaningful contexts, and the learning
will take care of itself.
What Is Authentic Learning?
Source: From A Time and a Place for Authentic Learning, by J. S. Renzulli, M. Gentry, and S. M. Reis, 2004, Educational
Leadership, 62(1), 7377. Copyright 2004 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
93
Independent Study
All learning exists on a continuum that ranges

from deductive and prescriptive learning on
one end to inductive, self-selected, and investigative learning on the other. The essence
of inductive or high-end learning is applying
relevant knowledge and skills to solving real
problems. Such learning involves nding and
focusing on a problem; identifying relevant
information; categorizing, critically analyzing,
and synthesizing that information; and effectively communicating the results.
Real-life problems share four criteria. First, a
real-life problem has a personal frame of reference. In other words, the problem must involve
an emotional or internal commitment on the
part of those involved in addition to a cognitive interest. Second, no agreed-on solutions
or prescribed strategies for solving the problem exist. If they do, the process would more
appropriately be classied as a training exercise
because its main purpose would be to teach
predetermined content or thinking skills.
Third, real-life problems motivate people to
nd solutions that change actions, attitudes, or
beliefs. A group of students might gather, analyze, and report on data about the communitys
television-watching habits, causing people in
that community to think critically about the
television-viewing habits of young people. Last,
real-life problems target a real audience. For
example, students working on a local oral history projecta biographical study of Connecticut
Small Study Group
Each week, all the students at the Bret Harte

Middle School in Oakland, California, leave
their classrooms to participate in interest-based
enrichment clusters. Under a teachers guidance, one group of students is identifying,
archiving, and preserving documents from the
1800s that were found in a suitcase belonging to the rst pharmacist in Deadwood, South
Dakota. Another group with strong interests in
media, technology, and graphic arts is converting the archives into digital format and making
the students research available on a Web site.
These crossgrade clusters are scheduled on
a rotating basis during the fall months. They
usually last for eight weeks, generally meeting weekly for a double-period time block,
with a new series scheduled in the spring. A
medium-sized school might typically offer 15
to 20 clusters. The number of students in each
cluster varies depending on student interest in
the topic and teacher requirements for effective student participation. Teachers develop the
clusters around their own strengths and interests, sometimes working in teams that include
parents and community members.
Numerous schools across the United States
have developed the enrichment cluster concept to deal with what many education leaders
believe is a crisis in our schools. The focus on
test preparation has squeezed more authentic
kinds of learning out of the curriculum, thereby
minimizing the one aspect of U.S. education
that contributes to the innovativeness and
creative productivity of the nations culture,
economy, and leadership role in the world.
Improved test scores are important, but its the

application of knowledge in authentic learning
situationsnot perpetual memorization and
testingthat characterizes a progressive education system.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
residents who died in Vietnaminitially presented their ndings to their classmates, mainly
to rehearse presentation skills. Their authentic
audience consisted of members of a local historical society, members of veterans groups, family members of servicemen and servicewomen,
attendees at a local commemoration of Vietnam
veterans, and community members who had
read about the research in the local newspaper.
Enrichment clusters are not minicourses.
There are no predetermined content or process
objectives. The nature of the problem guides
students toward using just-in-time knowledge,
appropriate investigative techniques or creative
production skills, and professional methods for
communicating results. In this type of learning,
students assume roles as investigators, writers,
artists, or other types of practicing professionals.
Authentic learning is the vehicle through
which everything from basic skills to advanced
content and processes come together in the
form of student-developed products and services. The students role changes from lessonlearner to rsthand inquirer, and the role of the
teacher changes from instructor and disseminator of knowledge to coach, resource procurer,
and mentor. Although products play an important role in creating authentic learning, students
learn principally from the cognitive, affective,
and motivational processes involved.
A Different Approach
Developing an authentic enrichment cluster
draws on skills that most teachers already possess, especially if they have been involved in
clubs or other extracurricular activities. As you
begin the process of developing your own cluster, keep in mind the following:
Reverse the teaching equation. Your role
in planning and facilitating an enrichment
cluster differs from the teachers traditional
role. Too much preplanning on your part
may push the cluster toward deductive rather
than inductive teaching and learning. Enrichment clusters develop just-in-time knowledge
that has immediate relevance in resolving the
94
problem. Students typically move to higher

levels of knowledge than grade-level textbooks support.
Reverse the role of students. Young people
working on an original piece of historical
research, creative writing, or play production
become young historians, authors, scenery
designers, and stage managers. Instead of
teaching lessons, you will begin to think
about how to help a young poet get work
published, how to get the shopping mall
manager to provide space for a display of
models of historically signicant town buildings, and how to engineer a presentation by
young environmentalists to the state wildlife
commission.
Create a unique enrichment cluster. As
long as you follow the guidelines for inductive teaching, there is no wrong way to
plan and facilitate an enrichment cluster.
Differences in interests, personalities, and
styles among cluster facilitators contribute
to the uniqueness of this type of learning.
Experience in an inductive learning environment will help you hone the skills that
will become a natural part of your teaching repertoire both in clusters and in your
classroom.
When in doubt, look outward. To mirror
real-world situations, examine conditions
outside the classroom for models of planning, teaching, and organizing. Athletic
coaches, advisors for the drama club or the
school newspaper, and 4-H Club leaders
make excellent enrichment cluster facilitators. Similarly, tasks and organizational patterns should resemble the activities that take
place in a small business, a social service
agency, a theater production company, or a
laboratory.
Guidelines for Developing an

Enrichment Cluster
Select a Topic
Base enrichment clusters on topics in which

you have a strong interest. Make a list of topics that fascinate you. Reect on your choices,
Ac ti v i ti e s
Focus on Key Questions
Develop enrichment clusters around the following six key questions:
Explore the Topic
The most obvious way to learn about the

work of a professional is to discuss the key
questions with someone working in the eld.
A cartoonist, landscape architect, or fashion
designer will give you the lay of the land and
offer some recommended resources. When
talking with professionals, keep in mind that
you want to learn what they routinely do
in their jobs, how they do it, and what they
produce. This background material will help
you plan the cluster, but students should also
pursue the same questions with professionals
after the cluster commences. Such interaction
95
Independent Study
These questions do not need to be answered

immediately, sequentially, or comprehensively
at this stage. As your cluster develops, have
students discuss the questions and allow them
to reach their own conclusions about the activities, resources, and products that professionals
pursue in particular areas of study. If you have
all the answers ready before the cluster begins,
the excitement of pure inquiry will be lost.
Small Study Group
What do people with an interest in this

topic or area of study do?
What products do they create, and what
services do they provide?
What methods do they use to carry out
their work?
What resources and materials are needed
to produce high-quality products and services?
How and with whom do they communicate the results of their work?
What steps do cluster participants need
to take to have an impact on an intended
audience?
dramatically increases motivation and engagement.

Almost all professionals belong to professional associations. A quick Internet search
turns up approximately 3,500 professional
organizations. To learn about the work that
genealogists do, one teacher went to the Association of Professional Genealogists Web site
(www.apgen.org) and found a treasure trove of
resources on careers in the eld, conferences,
publications, places where family records can
be found, and local chapters. She also located
a directory of members by state. Association
membership lists can suggest speakers, mentors, or enrichment cluster cofacilitators. By
clicking on Connecticut, the teacher found the
names, addresses, and phone numbers of 13
professional genealogists in the state, one of
whom lived in close proximity to the school.
Another way to explore the key questions
as you develop cluster content is to obtain
resource books on the methodology of a particular eld. A visit to the Genealogical Publishing Company Web site yielded an extensive list
of potential resources: 423 titles, to be exact.
Librarians and college bookstores can also help
locate methodological resource books.
In the real world, almost all work is intended
to have an impact on at least one targeted audience. In nding target audiences, you will be
serving as a referral agent, promoter, or marketing manager of student work. In school, fellow
students and parents are obvious audiences for
whom students can practice and perfect performances and presentations, but young people
will begin to view themselves in a much more
professional role when you help them seek
audiences outside the school. The students
themselves should make the contacts and be
prepared to answer questions.
Local newspapers, city or state magazines,
and literary reviewsespecially those that
target young authorsare excellent places to
submit written work. Public buildings and business ofces are often receptive to requests to
display student artwork. Local or state organizationssuch as historical societies, writers
Large Group
discuss your list with colleaguesthere may be

possibilities for collaborationand prioritize
the topics to help you decide on the focus of
your rst enrichment cluster.
Small Study Group
Large Group
clubs, civic groups, environmental preservation

organizations, and advocacy groupsalso provide opportunities for young entrepreneurs to
present their work. Young dramatists can take
their performances on the road to senior citizen
centers, day-care centers, religious groups, or
professional organizations. One group of students who wrote and produced a legal thriller
presented a synopsis of the plot at a county bar
association meeting.
Contests and competitions are also great
outlets. Most teachers are familiar with science
fairs, National History Day, and Math League,
but thousands of other competitions take place
in such areas as photography, fashion design,
inventions, drama, and Web design. Searching
for outlets and audiences; writing query letters
and submitting work for possible publication,
presentation, or display; and receiving replies
both positive and negativeare all part of the
creative process and motivate aspiring writers,
scientists, and artists.
Independent Study
Write Your Enrichment Cluster Description
The enrichment cluster description should

convey, in no more than 100 words, the
essence of the experience. Use verbs that
emphasize the explorative nature of the cluster
by conveying action and illustrating tasks. For
example, in a cluster that involves building and
marketing compost bins, you might use such
verbs as design, eld-test, construct, advertise,
market, contact, display, and sell.
You might also pose questions about
potential student interests and possible types
of involvement: Do you like to express your
feelings by writing poetry or short stories? Are
you concerned about nding better ways to
protect wildlife? Would you like to try your
hand at designing fashions for teens? Each of
these questions relates to a topic around which
a cluster might be developed, yet they are all
open-ended enough to encompass a broad
range of activities in specic interest areas.
Launch Your Enrichment Cluster
Although students who have signed up for

your cluster have expressed an interest in the
96
topic, it may take them some time to understand the clusters approach to learning. Displaying products or tools that professionals in
your topic area typically use is always a good
way to begin. In a cluster on archaeology, entitled The Trash Heaps of Mankind, the facilitator
showed slides of famous and local archaeological discoveries. She opened a Mystery Box in
the front of the room to reveal a trowel, a sieve,
a pair of gloves, a dust brush, pegs and string,
a marking pen, and a camera. She pointed out
that these were the main tools of the archaeologist and that an examination of material found
in garbage dumps was one of the ways in
which archaeologists analyzed past and present cultures. A short videotape of a dig in the
students own state heightened student interest
in the work of practicing archaeologists.
Escalate Content and Process
One of the problems we encountered in our

research on enrichment clusters was a failure
on the part of some facilitators to escalate the
level of content and methodology pursued
within a cluster. Indeed, critics may point out
that clusters are nothing more than fun and
games or that students carry out their work
using existing skills rather than acquiring more
advanced ones. You can guard against these
criticisms by examining each cluster with an
eye toward providing authentic and rigorous
content within the topic area.
In a cluster on research about political opinion, for example, students evaluated archived
news articles and editorials from the World War
II and Vietnam War eras to analyze and compare public support for these wars. Students
in an ecology and evolutionary biology cluster
studied the survival prospects of tropical plants
grown in the schools greenhouse and conducted experiments to explore optimal conditions for propagation. Content and process
objectives evolve as a result of the investigations that students conduct, and this is one
factor that highly differentiates the clusters from
regular instruction.
Ac ti v i ti e s
Most teachers have had a vision, at one time

or another, about what they thought teaching would entail. They pictured themselves in
Joseph S. Renzulli is Director of the National Research

Center on the Gifted and Talented at the University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; [email protected].
Marcia Gentry is Associate Professor of Education Studies at
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Sally M. Reis is
Professor and Chair of the Educational Psychology Department at the University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
97
Independent Study
Putting It All Together
Small Study Group
During many years of working with students in

authentic learning situations, we have discovered that there is a certain magic associated
with gathering original data and using that
information to create new knowledge. This
knowledge may not be new for all humankind, but it may be original to students and
their local audiences. A group of elementary
students spent an entire school year gathering
and analyzing samples of rainwater for sulfur
and nitrogen oxide emissions, the main pollutants responsible for acid rain. The students
then prepared a report concerning the extent
of acid rainfall in their region of the country.
Their teacher helped them obtain a standard
rain gauge and a kit for testing acidity.
Additional resources enabled these students
to prepare statistical and graphic summaries
of their data; compare their ndings with data
from national and regional reports that were
easily accessed on the Internet; and design
maps showing acid rain trends over time and
across geographic regions. The data provided
participants with the excitement and motivation to study environmental and health problems associated with various types of pollution.
The students found receptive audiences for
their work among state environmental protection groups, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, and the National Weather Bureau.
classrooms with interested and excited students

dramatizing dangerous midnight journeys on
the Underground Railroad, conducting science
experiments to nd out how things work, or
experiencing the exhilaration that occurs when
a student-developed board game unlocks the
relationships between a set of numbers and
everyday experiences.
Many teachers, however, experience a disconnect between their vision of a challenging
and rewarding career and the day-to-day grind
of test preparation. What is most ironic about
the separation between the ideal and the reality of todays classrooms is that most teachers
actually have the skills and motivation to do
the kinds of teaching they dream of. Unfortunately, lists, regulations, and other peoples
requirements have resulted in both a prescriptive approach to teaching and a barrier to
creating a challenging and exciting classroom.
Overprescribing the work of teachers has, in
some cases, lobotomized good teachers and
denied them the creative teaching opportunities
that attracted them to the profession in the rst
place.
Freedom to teach still exists, as does the
possibility of making learning enjoyable,
engaging, and enriching. You can nd both in
enrichment clusters, where authentic learning is
in the drivers seat.
Large Group
Gathering Original Data
Guiding Questions for A Time and a Place for Authentic Learning

1. The term authentic is a frequently used adjective in the area of performance assessment and teaching and learning for understanding. What do the
authors of this article mean by the term?
2. In your opinion, to what extent is the learning in your school or district

authentic, as described by Joseph Renzulli, Marcia Gentry, and Sally Reis?
In what areas and contexts is it most powerfully authentic? In what areas is
improvement needed? Why?
Small Study Group
Large Group
Independent Study
3. The strategies presented in this article for making learning authentic are
highly aligned with the principles of Understanding by Design. How does
the different approach described by the authors parallel the three stages of
backward design?
4. The authors of this article strongly afrm the value and power of problem
solving as the basis for authentic learning. How often do you or fellow educators in your school or district apply the following steps described by the
authors?
98
Find and focus on a specic problem.

Identify relevant information.
Categorize, critically analyze, and synthesize the information.
Effectively communicate with others.
Activities
5. What do Renzulli, Gentry, and Reis mean by enrichment clusters? How is

their recommendation to focus on key questions similar to Understanding by
Designs emphasis on essential questions?
Small Study Group
6. The work of enrichment clusters, as presented by the articles authors, richly

parallels the design elements of G.R.A.S.P.S. as described by Grant Wiggins
and Jay McTighe. How do these two models compare and contrast?
Large Group
Guiding Questions for A Time and a Place for Authentic Learning

(continued)
Independent Study
7. The authors conclude: Freedom to teach still exists, as does the possibility
of making learning enjoyable, engaging, and enriching. You can nd both
in enrichment clusters, where authentic learning is in the drivers seat. How
does the philosophy presented here align with that of Wiggins and McTighe?
99
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
The Engaged Classroom

Sam M. Intrator
Nothing deflates a teacher more than bored

students. Heres how teachers can get teens
energized about learning.
I do my research by shadowing teenagers in
school. Even though Im a veteran high school
and college teacher and the father of three, I
gure the truest and most accurate way I can
learn about the way teaching and learning happen in high schools is to experience what adolescents experience throughout a school day. I
recently spent 130 days shadowing students in
a diverse California high school. As I sat side
by side with young people in classrooms and
later debriefed them about their experiences, I
focused on two central questions:
What is happening in students heads and
hearts as they experience school?
What characterizes classroom episodes
during which students become wholly
engaged and energized, nding genuine
meaning in academic experiences?
My questions have their genesis in my
teachers heart. One of my best memories of
the dozen years I spent teaching high school is
the day my classroom sprang to life in a erce,
dazzling discussion of how themes in Billie
Holidays recording of Strange Fruit connected to The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
Even after the bell rang, the students wouldnt
stop debating.
Its been almost 20 years since that day, and
I now teach at Smith College. Moments when I
see the collective attention of my students and
feel their energy for the subject at hand still
represent the grail I pursue in teaching. When I
stand before my class, I scan the rows of faces
and wonder whether the students are with
meand if theyre not, where are they? In my

research, I seek to understand the experiential
terrain of students class time and detect links
between what teachers do and what young
people take in. Here is what I am learning.
Dream Factories or Deserts?

Classrooms are powerful places. They can
be dynamic settings that launch dreams and
delight minds, or arid places that diminish hope
and deplete energy. The students I shadowed
experienced them as both, but they generally
described their academic experience as listless
and tedious. My observations and conversations
with students afrm prior research, such as
that conducted by John Goodlad in his massive study of U.S. secondary schools. Goodlad
(1984) concluded that the typical classroom
possessed a at neutral emotional ambiance
[where] . . . boredom is a disease of epidemic
proportion (p. 9). Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and
Reed Larsons study (1984), in which teenagers
carried electronic pagers and self-report forms
to monitor moods, reected the same trend.
The beepers were randomly activated, signaling
students to ll out self-report forms on what
they were doing and their immediate state of
mind or emotion. Csikszentmihalyi and Larson
found that
Compared to other contexts in their
lives, time in class is associated with
lower-than-average states on nearly
every self-report dimension. Most
notably, students report feeling sad,
irritable, and bored; concentration
is difcult; they feel self-conscious
and strongly wish they were doing
something else. (p. 9)
Source: From The Engaging Classroom, by S. M. Intrator, 2004, Educational Leadership, 62(1), 2025. Copyright 2004 by
the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
100
Ac ti v i ti e s
Flavors of Disengagement
This charade of attention often masks students crafty and surreptitious efforts to undertake projects unrelated to the class unfolding
The nal category of student experience I

identied, engaged time, represents students
deeply immersed in learning. From my vantage point as the shadow, I witnessed students
becoming roused to life, animated with feelings
and ideas. Episodes of intense concentration
occurred. High schoolers experienced these
moments as provocative, enchanting, memorable, and enjoyable. They described feeling
immersed and involved and said things like I
cant believe how fast class went! or That was
intense!
After sitting with students through hundreds
of class sessions and engaging in postmortem
analyses of how they experienced class time,
Ive come to believe that these episodes of
engagement represent formidable triumphs
of teaching. I believe they happened because
a teacher made crucial pedagogic decisions
in the short term and cultivated a powerful
classroom ethos over the long term. Watching different teachers during these episodes
101
Independent Study
I set up my books, position my

calculator, and sit forward in my
seat not because Im interested, but
because I know my teachers like
to see me looking like Im paying
attention.
Engaged Time: The Grail of Teaching
Small Study Group
Slow time. Students often described class time

as monotonous and classroom activities as
predictable, mechanically routine, and dull. As
one student put it, Sitting in class is like being
in the car with your parents on a long road trip
without your CD player. When students experience slow time you can watch them trying to
invent ways to occupy themselves. They read
magazines, listen surreptitiously to headphones,
or drift off into daydreams.
Lost time. A more intense form of disengagement I observed possessed strange, almost
eerie properties. During lost time, time unfolds
without students being able to describe or
articulate any form of experience. They do not
describe themselves as daydreaming but as passively waiting for class to end. As one student
said, I enter a zone where time bends, but
does not move.
Fake time. Aware that teachers monitor their
engagement and attention, teenagers tactically
position themselves to appear attentive. They
devote energy to what Denise Pope (2001)
calls doing school, by which she means going
through the right motions to appear as though
they are learning and focused. One student told
me that
before them. Students do homework, pass notes,

generate to-do lists, and study for quizzesall
the while monitoring the teacher and classroom
activities.
Worry time. High schoolers spend vast
stretches of time worrying and strategizing
about nonacademic matters. Students describe
a host of distractions to their attention that
drain their capacity to emotionally and intellectually connect with what happens in class
from romantic spats to impending athletic
events or drama performances.
Play time. Ive observed students as they
watched movies, listened to wonderful musical
recordings, and sat through interesting lectures.
Students in this state of experience are generally attentive but passive. They watch with the
vigor of a popcorn-scarng sitcom viewer. Ive
also sat with students who were purportedly
engaged in collaborative group work, but who
were actually deep in off-topic social conversation that would tactically shift upon arrival of
the teacher.
Large Group
To characterize class experience as merely

boring overlooks important facets of student
experience. Boredom by denition is a feeling
of weariness brought on by tedious iteration
or dullness (Stein, 1975). Through my research
I observed students experiencing class time
several different ways, often drifting from one
state of experience to another.
Large Group
Global teens have been brought up

to experience and expect sensory
stimulation. This generation is
constantly looking for new thrills
that entertain. The preferred music
is loud. The movies enjoyed feature
fast action. The dances are rhythmic
and frenetic. . . . Global teens have a
very low threshold for boredom.
. . . Do not bore this generation or it
will abandon you. (p. 45)
Independent Study
of potent teaching, I noted one commonalitythese teachers fought ercely to hold their
students attention. They appeared to recognize
that teenagers are unabashed and savvy consumers of many things. Our youth carry credit
cards, cell phones, pagers, and car keys. Teens
intuitively grasp that the inalienable right of
a consumer is the power to choose. They are
full-edged shoppers with a ubiquitous taste
for things fast, jazzy, and loud. Global marketing executive Elissa Moses (2000) notes that
Small Study Group
The teachers who successfully held

the attention of students used a variety of
approaches and techniques. Generally, they
practiced anti-boredom pedagogy and were
relentlessly attuned to the attention-scape of
their classroom. When attention waned, they
intervened. Here is a sampling of approaches.
Manipulate Classroom Pace
One teacher veered between a frenetically

paced question-and-answer discussion and
long spans of quiet journaling time. She told
me that her model for pace was MTV:
I try and jar students into paying
attention with lots of transitions,
quick back-and-forth followed by
some slow times. I see myself as a
deejay at a party.
Teachers also broke routines to get students
attention. Taking students outside for class,
introducing a subject with dramatic footage
from a video, bringing visitors into the classroom, or dressing up in costume were all
102
strategies teachers used to be novel and garner

attention.
Feed the Need to Create
Students were most vibrant when creating or thinking about something new. I cant
emphasize enough how invigorating it was
for them to be part of a discussion or project
that allowed them to express their originality.
Students tuned in when they felt ownership
over ideas expressed in class and felt they
were in a safe place to share their own ideas.
They yearned to be listened to and have their
insights taken seriously.
Share Your Personal Presence
Energy and passion matter. We all know

that if you are in the presence of someone
who yawns, in a short time youll be yawning
yourself. When I observe students, the same
phenomenon holds sway. Energized, expressive
teaching fosters energized learning; sedentary,
monotonous teaching sabotages attention.
Personal presence does not need to be boisterous, but it must be authentic. Teachers who
connected with students told poignant personal
stories, conveyed their passions, and expressed
emotion and vulnerability. Time and again, I
heard students say about teachers who were
capable of snaring attention, Mr. X is a real
person.
Students also responded when teachers
shared their own love affair with learning
and scholarship. When teachers showed
wonder and passion for what they taught
sharing what they were learning from their
own reading or in courses they were taking
students sometimes rolled their eyes. But I
rarely thought they meant it.
Know Students as People
The young people I spent time with wanted

their teachers to know them as people. They
wanted teachers to understand their experiences, interests, aspirations, needs, fears, and
idiosyncrasies. Feeling known, understood, and
appreciated matters.
Ac ti v i ti e s
Hearts and Minds

During the past year, people in the United
States have heard a lot about winning the
hearts and minds of others. This term suggests gaining the positive attention of a group
of people for a virtuous purpose. Although
the term has been co-opted by the media and
politicians, it has a deeper meaning for teachers. We must win students hearts and minds by
engaging them in whatever subject we teach,
so they can discover genuine meaning and
value in their academic experience.
References
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years.
New York: BasicBooks.
Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects
for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Moses, E. (2000). The $100 billion allowance: Accessing the global teen market. New York: Wiley.
Pope, D. C. (2001). Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic,
and miseducated students. New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press.
Stein, J. (Ed.). (1975). The Random House College
Dictionary. New York: Random House.
Sam M. Intrator is Assistant Professor of Education and
Child Study at the Program in Urban Studies, Smith College,
Northampton, Massachusetts; 413-585-3242; sintrato@smith
.edu.
103
Independent Study
The teenagers I shadowed were on a

journey, striving to gure out who they are,
to whom they belong, what talents and potential they have, and where they might end up.
Teachers who engaged young people used
virtually any subject matter as an opening to
meaningful conversation about big ideas like
these. Questions that focused attention were
often connected to psychosocial dilemmas that
many students were already working out for
themselves.
For example, to emphasize that statistics is
a potent tool for highlighting inconsistencies
in our culture, one math teacher capitalized
on the adolescent sensitivity to paradox. This
teacher had students develop a survey and
poll the school about its civic values: Results
showed a student body that cared deeply about
community issues. The students then analyzed
survey results from the New Millennium Young
Voters Project, which showed that only one in
ve young people between the ages of 18 and
20 votes. They learned not only the process of
polling and tabulating survey results but also a
means to interpret their world and understand
their generation through statistics.
One English teacher designed an assignment
asking students to construct an experience
I like the story about Huck, but

what I found more interesting was
how the assignment made me think
about my own journey. Im not
heading down the Mississippi, but
connecting each stage of life that
Huck experienced with my own
helped me think about my own
journey as well.
Small Study Group
Connect Content to Teen Questionings
wheel that compared Huckleberry Finns

developmental journey with their own journey
to adulthood. One student reected that
Large Group
The teachers I observed in turn genuinely

enjoyed young people. They were kid-savvy
and created opportunities to get to know their
students beyond the classroomattending
after-school events, devising assignments that
gave appropriate access to the personal realm,
and working to stay connected. Effective teachers used this knowledge of the personal to create bridges between their students and course
content. For example, one teacher I observed
would frequently frame questions using snippets of personal information: John, youve told
me about your passion for weightlifting. Linda,
youve described your fascination with theater.
In The Catcher in the Rye, what are Holdens
passions?
Guiding Questions for The Engaged Classroom

1. A key element of student achievementespecially as it reects student
understanding and capacity for authentic, real-world transferis the issue of
engagement and student efcacy. How does Sam Intrator make his case for
the importance of this element in the classroom?
2. In the section entitled Dream Factories or Deserts?, Intrator cites a research

conclusion of Csikszentmihalyi and Larson (1984): Most notably, students
report feeling sad, irritable, and bored; concentration is difcult; they feel
self-conscious and strongly wish they were doing something else. How often
do you observe these behaviors in your school or classroom? What accounts
for their presence among someor allstudents?
Small Study Group
Large Group
3. Intrator recommends several key approaches to addressing waning student

attention and engagement:
Independent Study
Manipulate the classroom pace (e.g., lots of transitions, quick back and
forth activities).
Feed the need to create (i.e., use discussions and projects that allow students to express their originality).
Share your personal presence (i.e., reinforce a sense of academic trust by
expressing energy and passion when teaching).
Know your students as people (i.e., whenever possible, address students
personal interests, experiences, background knowledge, and learning
style preferences).
Connect content to teen questionings (i.e., align students learning experiences with their need to gure out who they are, whom they belong to,
what talents and potential they have, and where they might end up).
How do Intrators recommendations parallel the recommendations made
by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe for assessing teaching and learning for
understanding?
104
Activity 2.3
Connections Among the Three Stages

A critical issue for educators exploring ways to implement Understanding by Design successfully involves aligning and connecting the three
stages of the backward design process. In Understanding by Design:
The Experts and Practitioners Speak, for example, this issue is reinforced as a central priority in working with this framework. Participants in professional development groups may wish to use Connecting
Principles for the Three Stages to discuss the relationship between and
among Stages 1, 2, and 3.
Small study groups can adopt the recommendations presented for
large group exploration of aligning the three stages. In addition to the
directions above, participants can use their small study group setting
to discuss and debate potential ways to address areas of misalignment.
The set of principles and key guiding questions presented in Connecting Principles for the Three Stages can focus and inform one or more
sessions for small study groups exploring ways to implement Understanding by Design successfully.
Individuals engaged in independent study can use Connecting Principles for the Three Stages to assess their understanding of ways to
align the three stages of backward design. Those elements that appear
confusing or vague can become the basis for further reading, research,
and independent study.
105
Large Group
Connecting Principles for the Three Stages

As you read the following connecting principles, consider these two questions:
To what extent do we currently do this in our classrooms and schools?
What areas of alignment are weak or missing in our classrooms and schools?
Small Study Group
1. All desired results identied in Stage 1 (i.e., established goals,

enduring understandings, essential questions, and enabling knowledge objectives) must be aligned with one or more of the assessment tasks identied in Stage 2.
Independent Study
2. The established goals (i.e., power standards) identied in Stage 1

are the basis for determining the big ideas that should be assessed
and taught for purposes of deep and enduring understanding.
3. Students need to understand where they are going and why they
are going there (Stage 3, the W in W.H.E.R.E.T.O.). This principle
for designing learning activities aligns powerfully with Stage 2s
emphasis on students self-reection, self-assessment, and active use
of rubrics and other scoring tools to monitor their own progress.
106
Activities
Large Group
Connecting Principles for the Three Stages (continued)

4. Stage 3s emphasis on authentic learning, conceptual understanding,
and transfer aligns powerfully with Stage 1s emphasis on big idea
cueing tools (i.e., enduring understandings and essential questions)
and Stage 2s commitment to authentic, performance-based assessment, including culminating performance tasks and projects such as
G.R.A.S.P.S.
Small Study Group

Independent Study
5. The rst E of W.H.E.R.E.T.O. (exploration and equipping all

learners for success) aligns powerfully with Stage 1s emphasis on all learners acquiring the same enduring understandings,
essential questions, and objectives aligned with the six facets of
understanding and Stage 2s commitment to authentic, performancebased assessment (particularly real-world culminating projects via
G.R.A.S.P.S.).
6. The R in W.H.E.R.E.T.O. (rethink and revise) underscores the

power of student self-reection and self-regulation and aligns with
the emphasis on self-assessment in Stage 2 and the six facets of
understanding (especially self-knowledge).
107
Connecting Principles for the Three Stages (continued)

7. The second E in W.H.E.R.E.T.O. underscores the need for evaluating understanding of evaluation criteria (Stage 2) and the need for
all learners to acquire deep understandings of the content they are
studying (Stage 1), including a capacity for conceptual application
and transfer of learning to new and unanticipated settings and contexts.
Small Study Group
Large Group
Independent Study
8. The T in W.H.E.R.E.T.O. (tailoring student learning to address

readiness levels, interests, and learning styles) aligns with the equity
principle of Stage 1 (i.e., all learners should acquire deepening
understandings of what they are studying) and the self-reection
and authentic assessment principles of Stage 2.
9. The O in W.H.E.R.E.T.O. (organizing learning activities to promote

growing levels of student transfer and independent use of curriculum content) aligns powerfully with Stage 2s concept of authentic,
performance-based assessment (especially G.R.A.S.P.S.) and Stage
1s commitment to big ideas, enduring understandings, and essential
questions as the heart and soul of desired results.
108
Activity 2.4
Exploring Stage 1: Identify Desired Results

Professional development groups can use Stage 1: A SelfReection Questionnaire to discuss the extent to which Stage 1
design principles and elements are operational in their respective
classrooms and schools.
Small Study Group
Small study groups can use Stage 1: A Self-Reection Questionnaire as
a catalyst for designing and implementing reading-based activities and
investigations related to key Stage 1 design elements, including
1. Unpacking standards using the three-circle audit process.
2. Determining power standards and related big ideas.
3. Developing enduring understandings and essential questions based
on power standards.
4. Designing enabling knowledge objectives aligned with one or more
of the six facets of understanding.
Individuals engaged in independent study can use Stage 1: A SelfReection Questionnaire to examine the level of implementation of
Stage 1-related elements and strategies in their respective classrooms,
schools, or districts.
109
Stage 1: A Self-Reection Questionnaire
Small Study Group
Somewhat
Evident
Not
Evident
Instructional Priority
Evident
To what extent is each of the following Understanding by Design instructional

priorities addressed in your classroom, school, or district?
Highly
Evident
Large Group
1. We have to build consensus about our content standards and

what they suggest about what all students should know, do, and
understand.
2. We developed performance standards and indicators to identify
the types of performances that should be benchmarks to monitor
students progress relative to our content standards.
3. Our classrooms help students to understand what they are
expected to know, do, and understand at the conclusion of
lessons, units, and courses of study.
Independent Study
4. We organize our desired results around those standards that

require students to demonstrate deep understanding and transfer.
5. We cue students into the big ideas of our curriculum, reinforcing
their ability to see patterns, connections, and interrelationships
within the content they study.
6. We anchor units around enduring understandingsstatements
that describe what students are expected to understand (e.g.,
Students will understand that . . . )
7. We help students investigate understandings through essential
questions.
8. We clearly articulate enabling knowledge objectives to learners,
with objectives clearly stating what they are expected to know and
be able to do.
9. Our objectives are framed in language reective of one or more of
the six facets of understanding.
10. Our desired results are clearly aligned with our assessment
evidence and teaching activities.
110
Activity 2.5
Exploring Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence

Professional development groups can use Stage 2: A Self-Reection
Questionnaire to discuss the extent to which Stage 2 design principles and elements are operational in their respective classrooms and
schools. This activity is especially useful for large groups investigating
issues related to balanced assessment and overcoming teach-to-the-test,
worksheet-based approaches to accountability testing.
Balancing assessment, using a range of assessment tools for purposes of diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment.
Assessing the extent to which a photo albumrather than a snapshotof student achievement data is a consistent part of assessment practices.
Integrating constructed-response test items into tests and quizzes.
Encouraging students to assume an active role in the assessment
process, including reective assessment practices.
Using performance assessment tasks and projects to anchor the
assessment of student understanding.
Ensuring alignment between the desired results and the form of
assessment used to monitor student achievement.
Individuals engaged in independent study can use Stage 2: A SelfReection Questionnaire to examine the level of implementation of
Stage 2-related elements and strategies in their respective classrooms,
schools, or districts. This questionnaire and its elements are especially
useful for individuals interested in understanding research-based best
practices in the eld of assessment and evaluation.
111
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Somewhat
Evident
Not
Evident
Evident

Highly
Evident
Large Group
1. Our core curriculum contains rigorous content and performance

standards for all learners.
2. We have designed our curriculum so that teachers can monitor
all students progress and adjust instruction to accommodate
individual students strengths and needs.
3. Assessment clearly aligns with the desired results of our
curriculum.
4. All teachers in our school or district emphasize a photo album
approach to assessment, rather than a snapshot of student
achievement.
5. Tests and quizzes include constructed-response items in
which students are engaged in some form of timed or untimed
performance.
6. Self-assessment is a major part of monitoring student progress,
including the ongoing use of journals, logs, other reective
writings, and peer review and coaching.
7. Rather than merely assigning assessment activities, teachers
present them in the form of academic prompts that identify format,
audience, topic, and purpose.
8. At key points in our taught curriculum students have the
opportunity to engage in independent culminating performance
tasks and projects.
9. Students are an active part of the assessment and evaluation
process, with continuing emphasis on their self-reection and selfassessment relative to articulated standards.
10. Our testing program represents only one of multiple elements of
our approach to assessment and evaluation of student progress
and organizational effectiveness.
112
Activity 2.6
Exploring Stage 3: Plan Learning Activities

Professional development groups can use Stage 3: A SelfReection Questionnaire to discuss the extent to which Stage 3
design principles and elements are operational in their respective
classrooms and schools. This activity is especially useful for large
groups investigating issues related to designing and implementing
learning activities that promote deep levels of student understanding.
Small Study Group
Aligning Stages 1, 2, and 3.
Ensuring that students are clear about where they are heading
and why they are heading there.
Making diagnostic assessment an active part of teaching activities.
Hooking and engaging students interest and motivation.
Employing exploration to equip students for success and understanding.
Helping all students rethink and revise their understanding.
Ensuring that all students self-evaluate and self-express.
Tailoring instruction to accommodate students readiness levels,
interests, and learning styles.
Organizing learning activities so that students move from initial
experience toward growing levels of conceptual understanding
and independent application and transfer.
Evaluating students understanding of unit objectives.
Individuals engaged in independent study can use Stage 3: A SelfReection Questionnaire to examine the implementation level of
Stage 3 strategies and design principles in their respective classrooms,
schools, or districts.
113
Small Study Group
Somewhat
Evident
Not
Evident
Evident

Highly
Evident
Large Group
1. Instructors emphasize unit design, rather than discrete or isolated

lessons, and put the learner at the center of the learning process.
2. Students receive ongoing support to understand where they
are headed, why they are headed there, and ways they will be
evaluated along the way.
3. At key juncture points, students participate in activities to engage
and hook their interest and imagination.
4. Instructors emphasize experiential learning that allows students to
engage in exploration and inquiry.
Independent Study
5. Instruction encourages students to reect, revise, rethink, and

revisit their knowledge and growing understanding.
6. On a regular basis, students have opportunities to self-evaluate
and self-express.
7. Using ongoing monitoring and assessment processes, instructors
modify their teaching to accommodate students unique strengths
and needs.
8. Instructors organize learning experiences so that students
progress from (a) concrete experiences to (b) abstract
conceptualization and (c) independent understanding as
demonstrated through their ability to (d) explain, interpret, and
apply what they have learned in new and unanticipated situations
and settings.
114
U N D E RSTA N D I N G
DESIGN
AND THE SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT PROCESS
BY
Understanding by Design and the School

Improvement Process
This strand explores the emerging implications of Understanding by
Design for the school improvement planning process. Specically,
this section will introduce participants to reections and analyses by
experts as well as educators and administrators who have been successfully using Understanding by Design to improve student achievement. This part of the program reiterates the need for helping schools
to become genuine communities of inquiry and learning, emphasizing
student understanding and transfer.
Using a combination of video excerpts, professional development
activities, and suggested readings, this strand will help you to explore
the following questions:
How can educators promote the principles of equity and excellence using the Understanding by Design framework?
How can educators use Understanding by Design to improve
their professional development?
What are the inevitable issues, implementation gaps, and challenges that must be confronted to implement Understanding by
Design successfully in school settings?
115
Activity 3.1

This strand invites participants to explore the implications of Understanding by Design for the school improvement planning process. Use
the Previewing and Postviewing Chart to facilitate participant discussion, emphasizing the implications of the ideas presented in this section
for school or district improvement planning.
Small study group participants can use the Previewing and Postviewing Chart to start an ongoing investigation of specic implications of
Understanding by Design for their school or district. After the initial
viewing and discussion sessions, small study group members might
elect to take one or more of the issues and themes presented in this
strand for individual or paired study. At the conclusion of their investigations, they can present their conclusions to the small study group as
a whole.
Individuals can use the Previewing and Postviewing Chart as a catalyst
for self-reection and self-evaluation. Ideally, the independent study
process can be enhanced by pairing up with another educator to compare and contrast individual perceptions and conclusions.
116
Activities
Large Group
Previewing and Postviewing Chart

Before viewing the video excerpt, ll out the Previewing column. After viewing
the video excerpt, ll out the Postviewing column for any questions in which
your thinking has changed.
Guiding Questions
Previewing
Postviewing
Small Study Group
1. How do successful
schools reect the
elements of backward
design?
Independent Study
2. How can educators

promote the principles
of equity and
excellence using the
Understanding by
Design framework?
3. How can educators

use Understanding
by Design to improve
their professional
development?
4. What are the

inevitable issues,
implementation gaps,
and problems that
must be confronted
to implement
Understanding by
Design successfully in
school settings?
117
Previewing and Postviewing Chart (continued)

How have your responses changed after viewing and discussing the
video excerpts in this strand?
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
What can you take with you that will support your journey to provide
learning for understanding?
118
Activity 3.2
Exploring Understanding by Design for School
and District Use

The articles included for this activity emphasize what research and
long-term practice reveal about effective school improvement planning.
Guiding questions are included for each article to focus discussion.
Large group professional development can involve participants engaged
in a jigsaw cooperative learning activity involving the following steps:
1. Participants form expert groups to read and discuss one of the
articles included for this strand (using the suggested guiding questions for each article).
2. Each expert group prepares a ve-minute summary of the article
to present to the larger group, including its major conclusions and
their reactions to the ideas.
3. Ideally, this process should lead to a culminating discussion of the
implications of the ideas and strategies presented for the specic
school or district the workshop is being conducted for.
Small study groups can use the jigsaw approach described above to
process the articles, using the guiding questions for each article to
make notes. They may also elect to conduct a seminar on each of the
articles using the Culminating Questions.
Individuals can investigate these articles from the perspective of their
individual or personal role in promoting organizational change within
their school or district. They can reect on the guiding questions for
each article to focus their independent study.
119
Reective Questions
After reading one of the articles included in this activity, consider in your small
study group the following questions.
Small Study Group
1. What does the research tell you about effective school improvement
planning? What are the implications of the research for moving forward with Understanding by Design?
2. How can schools as learning organizations most effectivelyand

efcientlychange their organizational cultures and practices? In
your opinion, what changes are necessary when implementing
Understanding by Design?
3. What are the implications of these articles for your own school
improvement planning process? How do these implications apply to
Understanding by Design?
120
Activities
Large Group
School ImprovementAligned!
Kate M. Cassada, Carol J. Stevens, and Jamelle S. Wilson
By connecting district goal setting to school

initiatives and classroom application, a
Virginia school district makes accountability
work.
Source: From School ImprovementAligned, by K. M. Cassada, S. J. Stevens, and J. S. Wilson, 2005, Educational Leadership, 62(summer). Retrieved October 4, 2006, from www.ascd.org/educationalleadership. Copyright 2005 by the Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
121
Independent Study
To build commitment to excellence at all

levelsfrom the school board to the superintendent to principals to teachers to the larger
school communityour district established a
goal-alignment structure that begins with the
school board and the long-range planning
process. Representatives from every stakeholder
groupstudents, parents, teachers, support
staff, business leaders, administrators, central
ofce personnel, the superintendent, and school
board membersparticipate on the Long-Range
Planning Team. Led by a skilled facilitator, team
members collaborate to establish ve basic elements: beliefs, mission, objectives, parameters,
and strategies.
This long-range plan guides goal setting
for all district personnel. The superintendents
goals parallel the boards, while directors and
principals goals parallel the superintendents.
For example, the school board may suggest the
following goal: The board will promote the
delivery of effective instructional services as
the primary responsibility of the entire school
community. In alignment with this board goal,
one of the superintendents goals might be to
deliver the highest-quality education for each
student while meeting and exceeding state
(SOL) and national (NCLB) standards. A school
principal then analyzes demographic, achievement, and trend data for his or her school and
translates the superintendents goal into specic
school goalsfor example, to increase performance by all subgroups on SOL tests and
to meet adequate yearly progress in English
(Reading and Writing) and mathematics (Algebra I and Geometry). The principals goals
are shared with teachers and guide the School
Small Study Group
Hanover County Public Schools enjoy a reputation for excellence by almost all measures. We
have a high school dropout rate of less than 1
percent, and in 1997 we were the rst school
district in Virginia to receive the U.S. Senate
Award for Continuing Excellence. Located in
a beautiful section of the state that includes
rolling farmland, extensive tree-covered acreage, and suburban areas, Hanover County has
always served its students well.
But in spring 1998, every school system
in Virginia was faced with the challenge of
meeting new accreditation standards as the
state began implementation of the Standards of
Learning (SOL) exams, the assessment portion
of its accountability system. Hanover County
Public Schools, a school system that had met
other academic challenges with relative ease,
found itself in an unfamiliar position: We failed
to meet Virginias new accreditation standard
on the basis of our students performance on
the SOLs. In fact, only 1 of 17 schools in the
district met the requirements to receive full
state accreditation.
Concerned that the results of one measure
could harm the reputation of our school district, we developed a plan that propelled 100
percent of our schools to full state accreditation in just three years. For the last two years,
all 17 Hanover County schools have exceeded
the state accountability standards for academic
performance. The key to this improvement has
been alignment of goals, curriculum, instructional practices, and professional development.
Aligning Goals
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Improvement Planning Team as it establishes

performance targets for the school year.
Aligning Curriculum
Hanover County Public Schools also instituted
a multifaceted process to align our local curriculum with the Virginia Standards of Learning (SOLs), which identify specic knowledge,
skills, and concepts that students must master
in English, mathematics, science, and social
studies. Students are assessed for prociency
in these standards in grades 3, 5, and 8. In
addition, to receive an advanced or standard
diploma, students must pass not only specic
high school courses but also a number of
related SOL tests.
The knowledge and skills identied by the
SOLs help the district determine what is important to teach and learn. This process includes
mapping the curriculum by
Developing pacing charts (tools for planning and tracking the appropriate amount of
instructional time dedicated to each element
of the curriculum).
Identifying a scope and sequence for each
course to align the curriculum in a logical,
sequential manner.
Establishing curriculum guides that identify
the appropriate content to teach.
Aligning Instructional Practices

At the school level, principals and teachers
have taken steps to ensure that instructional
improvement efforts are aligned with those of
the Hanover County school board, the superintendent, and central ofce directors. When
the superintendent challenged district schools
to raise SOL scores, educators studied their
instructional programs to identify areas for
modication and improvement.
The activities of educators at Stonewall Jackson Middle School provide several examples of
this focus on improved scores. Since the 1990s,
the school has provided an extended learning block for 7th and 8th grade students called
CORE. During the 90-minute CORE period,
122
which is scheduled every other day, students

team teachers provide extra support in one of
the core academic subjects of language arts,
mathematics, science, and social studies. When
Virginias SOL program introduced a clear
vision of learning standards and the accompanying testing program, the teachers who
worked with CORE realized that they could use
this instructional time to supplement SOL-tested
academic instruction. These teachers created
a nine-week academic rotation of math (probability and statistics); language arts (poetry);
science (sound and oceanography); and social
studies (economics). In this way, they extended
their valuable instructional time by more than
30 hours.
The school also looked at the mathematics course choices for rising 6th grade students. Observing that 100 percent of 6th grade
students who enrolled in above-grade-level
mathematics passed the math SOL test, teachers
decided to challenge more students to handle
the advanced mathematics curriculum. We
began contacting the parents of students who
achieved high scores on the 5th grade mathematics SOL test and received As in 5th grade
mathematics to discuss the option of selecting
a higher-level 6th grade mathematics course. In
2002, we contacted the families of 47 students
who met these criteria; 46 chose to challenge
their children through a more advanced mathematics class that year. Every 6th grade student
who elected to move to a more challenging
mathematics class passed the state SOL
assessment.
Stonewall Jackson Middle Schools QUEST
tutorial program provides additional support
for SOL success for all students through three
avenuesmorning study sessions, afternoon
jam sessions, and elective tutorial classes.
Morning study sessions are designed to reteach
academic skills and concepts according to
individual student needs. Supplemental jam
sessions take place in the weeks just before
testing; any students interested in a quick and
intense review of key pieces of the curriculum
can attend these sessions to work in large and
Ac ti v i ti e s
U n d e r s t a n d i n g by De s i g n a n d th e S c h oo l I m p rove m e nt Pro c e s s
District and School Efforts Combined

It is unfair to expect individual schools or
teachers, working alone, to effect long-term
improvements in student achievement. The
improvement efforts in Hanover County Public
Schools demonstrate that student achievement
gains and school improvement depend on strategic planning and goal-setting at the district
123
Independent Study
Enhanced learning for students depends on

detailed, thoughtful professional development
for adults. In Hanover County Public Schools,
we studied and sought instructional strategies
that promote higher student achievement and
implemented staff development in those strategies. For example, we implemented Project
CRISS (CReating Independence through
Student-owned Strategies), a research-based
staff development program, in each of the
districts four middle schools. Project CRISS
provides training for teachers in such instructional strategies as Think-Pair-Share, concept
mapping, two-column notes, Power Notes, and
word mapping.1
We also began incorporating the philosophy
and principles of Total Quality Management
into classrooms to create a powerful learning environment by encouraging students to
become better problem solvers and critical
thinkers. We contracted with an education consultant to conduct professional development on
the use of Quality Tools in classrooms.2 These
tools enable students to brainstorm ideas, analyze cause-and-effect relationships, sort information by categories, and prioritize concepts
through different kinds of graphic aids, such as
shbone, lotus and force-eld diagrams. Thus,
students become better thinkers and learners.
After principals and other key school leaders
attended training on Project CRISS and Quality Tools, it was their task to introduce and
facilitate the use of these initiatives with the
instructional staff in their schools. The leadership team at Stonewall Jackson Middle School
Small Study Group
Aligning Professional Development
(including senior teachers, assistant principals,

and the principal) planned specic activities.
For example, during the teacher work week
before the beginning of the school year, several
senior teachers planned a scavenger hunt in
which teams of teachers went to interesting
historical and cultural sites around Richmond,
Virginia, to learn about the rich cultural offerings of the area. When each team arrived at
its nal location, a facilitator presented participants with a task that involved using one of
the Project CRISS or Quality Tools strategies.
The teachers used a KWL chart to brainstorm
what they Know (K) about the historical site,
generate questions about what they want (W)
to know about the site, and then record what
they learned (L) during the visit. Completing
these tasks helped teachers in various instructional teams and departments get to know one
another and introduced them to key Project
CRISS and Quality Tools concepts. Participants
enjoyed an active yet focused staff development day.
Follow-up Project CRISS and Quality Tools
staff development included a day of rotating
sessions taught by colleagues as well as faculty
meeting minisessions. All teachers at Stonewall
Jackson selected specic uses of Quality Tools
for their annual goal setting. Students quickly
caught on to these powerful, self-directed
strategies, and soon the schools classrooms
and halls boasted related student work displays. When the Hanover County school board
enjoyed its annual tour of Stonewall Jackson,
6th grade students made presentations about
their Project CRISS and Quality Tools learning
experiences, demonstrated their successes, and
taught attendees a related lesson.
Large Group
small groups on fun, fast-paced activities. Elective tutorial classes provide yearlong support
in language arts and mathematics for students
who need it; teachers of these classes purchase
appropriate materials and receive a stipend
through state SOL grant funding. The QUEST
coordinator and participating teachers track
student attendance and achievement, providing valuable data for program assessment and
planning.
Large Group
level as well as a commitment to district goals

at the school level. Through Hanover Countys
focus on student learning and alignment of
curriculum and instruction with district objectives, we are meeting accountability mandates
and moving toward the goal of leaving no child
behind.
Endnotes
1
Wicks, C., Peregoy, J., & Wheeler, J. (2001).

Plugged in! A teachers handbook for using total
quality tools to help kids conquer the curriculum. New Bern, NC: Class Action.
Kate M. Cassada is the former principal of Stonewall Jackson
Middle School, Mechanicsville, Virginia. Carol J. Stevens
([email protected]) is Director of Secondary Education and Jamelle S. Wilson ([email protected]
.k12.va.us) is Assistant Superintendent for Instructional Leadership, Hanover County Public Schools, Virginia.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
More information about Project CRISS is available at www.projectcriss.com.
124
Activities
1. According to this article, how did Hanover County (Virginia) Public Schools
connect district goal setting to school initiatives and classroom application?
3. A powerful use of Understanding by Design is in the area of curriculum

alignment. To what extent did the practices related to curriculum alignment
in Hanover County reect the backward design process?
5. Effective professional development is essential to the school improvement

planning process. How would you summarize the major professional development principles used by Hanover County? How did professional development align with overall district priorities?
6. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the authors concluding assertion: It is unfair to expect individual schools or teachers, working alone, to
effect long-term improvements in student achievement. [Improvement] efforts
demonstrate that student achievement gains and school improvement depend
on strategic planning and goal-setting at the district level as well as a commitment to district goals at the school level.
125
Independent Study
4. Instructional improvement efforts played a major role in the Hanover County

school improvement planning process. How did the district align its instructional practices? What are the implications of their process for your school or
district?
Small Study Group
2. A key element of school improvement in this district involved a goalalignment structure involving key stakeholder groups and a long-range
planning process. How did team members establish the following basic
elements: beliefs, mission, objectives, parameters, and strategies?
Large Group
Guiding Questions for School ImprovementAligned
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
How Schools Sustain Success

Valerie Chrisman
Showing improvement in student achievement

is one thing. The challenge is sustaining it
year after year.
Under the microscope of increased accountability, a growing number of U.S. schools have
been identied as underperforming on the
basis of their low test scores. No Child Left
Behind (NCLB) legislation demands that lowperforming schools improve their students
academic achievement annually. Yet sustained
increases in student achievement are problematic for underperforming schools. A case in
point: Only 83 of the 430 schools that participated in Californias Immediate Intervention
Underperforming Schools Program met their
students test score growth targets for two consecutive years ( Just & Boese, 2002).
To better understand the differences and
similarities between the 83 low-performing
schools that sustained improved student test
scores and the schools that were unable to
sustain this improvement, I conducted a study
of Californias primary and secondary reform
program schools. I compared the 83 schools
that sustained growth on Californias academic
program index for two consecutive improvement program years with the 273 schools that
showed growth for only one of the two years.
(The remaining 74 schools in the program
showed no growth in either year and were not
included in the study.)
I compared the successful and unsuccessful
schools according to three criteria: analyses of
test scores and school characteristics; interview
responses from four teachers and the principal at each of eight representative sample
schools, four from each group; and questionnaire responses from the 356 principals whose
schools experienced growth in at least one of

the two years of the reform program.
Analysis of sample school characteristics
revealed that the successful schools actually
had higher levels of student mobility and a
smaller percentage of fully credentialed teachers than the unsuccessful schools. Larger
schools were also more successful than smaller
schools at sustaining improved student test
scores.
This is not to suggest that schools should
advocate for increased student mobility, uncredentialed teachers, or larger enrollments to
improve student achievement. Neither specic characteristics of schools nor qualities of
students seemed to account for the striking differences between successful and unsuccessful
schools in this study. Rather, improved student
achievement seems to be the product of how
well a school operates and depends on the
quality of leadership and the effectiveness of
instructional programs and practices.
Teacher Leadership
Strong teacher leadership was apparent in each
of the four successful sample schools. Teacher
leadership appeared to develop when three
conditions were present. First, the teachers had
ample opportunities to make decisions about
teaching and learning. Successful schools provided teachers with time to meet as grade-level
or subject-matter teams. Moreover, teachers at
successful schools reported that they regularly
used this collaborative time to review student
work and to discuss how to strengthen their
classroom instruction.
Second, teachers engaged in various forms
of informal action research. They used the
results of their students assessments to compare
Source: From How Schools Sustain Success, by V. Chrisman, 2005, Educational Leadership, 62(5), 1620. Copyright 2005 by
126
Ac ti v i ti e s
The successful schools in the study, as opposed

to the unsuccessful ones, more often had
the same principal for the last three years.
127
Independent Study
Principal Leadership
Small Study Group
for staff members focused on learning how to

use Marzanos nine effective teaching strategies
(Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock, 2001) and on
increasing the rigor of their instruction by asking questions that required students to analyze,
synthesize, and evaluate new concepts. The
teachers believed that their focus on pedagogy
strengthened their collaborative teams.
Teachers at successful schools spent
between one and four hours weekly in collaborative lesson planning. This took place informally, during lunch or after school, as well as
in formal weekly planning meetings. Informal
conversations focused on successful lessons
or problems in teaching specic concepts. In
the formal weekly planning meetings, teachers shared student assessment data, analyzed
student work, and monitored their own progress toward teaching the standards. Most of the
successful schools hired substitutes to provide
teachers with regular collaboration time. Teachers from unsuccessful schools reported that
they collaborated when the principal scheduled it in place of a staff meeting. These meetings generally focused on planning for eld
trips, special events, and state testing.
Increased teacher leadership also created
challenges. Teacher leaders cited personality conicts with colleagues and perceived
resentment from those teachers who were
not in leadership positions. All teachers were
subsequently offered professional development to improve their leadership skills. Staff
development included video models of effective teacher-team meetings that foster collegial
and professional relationships. Professional
development included training in creating an
effective agenda and conducting productive
meetings. Teachers experienced in meeting
management and creating consensus coached
and mentored teachers who were new to leadership positions.
Large Group
different instructional strategies and different

classroom environments to see which strategies
and environments encouraged student learning.
Working together in this way enabled them to
create a continual improvement cycle for their
instruction.
Third, teachers developed their own internal
leadership structuressuch as team teaching,
mentoring new teachers, and collaborating to
share lesson designsto support one anothers
resolve to improve student achievement.
Teacher leaders at the successful schools also
made policy decisions. These decisions included
the design of student intervention programs,
the creation of student learning groups based
on the individual students skill weaknesses, the
implementation of new standards-based grading
systems, and a new focus on instructional strategies, such as reciprocal teaching. The teachers
implemented these new programs themselves.
To ensure consistency of implementation, they
met informally to monitor teacher usage of the
programs. When asked which changes contributed to sustained increases in student achievement, teachers at the successful schools cited
these kinds of teacher-initiated changes in teaching and learning.
Teacher leadership was strengthened in the
successful schools when teachers made decisions regarding professional development. To
select appropriate professional development,
teachers analyzed student data and determined
where students needed academic support. For
example, in one middle school, students tested
poorly on reading comprehension. Teachers
arranged for professional development for all
staff membersincluding mathematics, science,
and social studies teachersin how to teach
reading using informational text. After receiving the professional development and implementing specic instructional strategies in the
classroom, teachers reassessed the students to
see whether their test scores had improved.
In three of the four successful sample
schools, teachers sought professional development that focused on improved pedagogy.
Their selection of professional development
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Principals from successful schools believed that

their previous experience in high-performing
schools helped them hold higher expectations
for students in their state improvement program
schools. Principals stated that few colleagues,
however, voluntarily sought principal positions at such schools. One experienced principal recently assigned to a state improvement
program school said that when his colleagues
learned of his new assignment, they asked,
Who did you tick off?
Principals at the successful schools were
more likely to create time for teachers to collaborate and to provide them with structured
support. This included the principals frequent
attendance at grade-level or department meetings and the expectation that teachers provide
feedback on the meetings and let the principal
know what he or she could do to help them.
As a result, teachers at these schools said that
they regularly reviewed student work, created
rubrics and assessments, modeled lessons, and
monitored how they used the professional
development in the classroom.
When asked what they did to improve
student achievement at their schools, principals from successful schools produced lists
of programs, interventions, and professional
development opportunities that contributed to
this goal. These principals were comfortable
using data and making changes when the data
demonstrated that student achievement had
not risen. You cant feel sorry that something
doesnt work; you just have to try something
different, explained one principal after determining that the school would have to abandon
an unsuccessful after-school program.
The principals from the unsuccessful schools
were far less comfortable with data. One principal from an unsuccessful school described
his attempts to use data to improve his schools
effectiveness in raising student achievement as
shooting at moving targets. He claimed that
the school could not achieve its state growth
targets because the failing group just keeps
changing.
128
District Ofce Leadership

When asked to list three factors that were most
likely to improve test scores, surveyed principals from both successful and unsuccessful
schools included district leadership. All the
unsuccessful sample schools demonstrated a
lack of strong district leadership.
District leaders in successful schools provided more services than their counterparts
in unsuccessful schools did. The successful
schools beneted from focused districtwide
professional development on pedagogy. Moreover, each summer the district ofce delivered
follow-up professional development for new
hires so that all teachers would have the opportunity to learn the same teaching strategies.
At the start of each school term, successful
schools more often received assessment data
disaggregated by teacher and by individual
student than did unsuccessful schools. Teachers
and principals also received training on how
to use these data to improve instruction and
academic achievement. In successful schools,
teachers were more likely to nd value in
the district-provided benchmark assessments
designed to track a students learning. Teachers talked about how they used the assessment
results to modify their instruction, such as
creating student intervention and enrichment
groups. The teachers sometimes agreed to alter
their pacing calendars when they learned that
the students were grasping new concepts either
more quickly or more slowly than they had
anticipated.
Principals from both successful and unsuccessful schools discussed their districts practice
of assigning experienced principals to schools
with the greatest parent involvement and the
greatest potential for parent conicts. These
schools tended to be in the highest socioeconomic areas of the district. New principals were
placed in schools in which parent demands
and conicts were expected to be fewer. These
schools tended to be in the lowest socioeconomic areas of the district. This practice
contributed to a belief that ultimately became
Ac ti v i ti e s
129
Independent Study
Some districts implemented a policy for state

improvement program schools to receive additional district services. These services included
additional professional development, additional visitations and support in curriculum and
instruction from district personnel, districtprovided grant writers, more comprehensive
data analysis, and greater on-site visibility
of the district superintendent. Unsuccessful
schools did not receive these services.
Students who are learning English as a second

language and students who are academically
below grade level attending the successful
schools had quite different experiences from
those of comparable students who attended
unsuccessful schools.
At the successful schools, teachers presented
instruction that directly reinforced the students
understanding of how the English language
works instead of teaching students conversational English. For example, rather than use
curriculum that focused on teaching situational
vocabularysuch as how to order a meal in a
restaurantteachers at successful schools used
curriculum that focused on academic English
and taught students how to use root words,
sufxes, prexes, and verb endings. Teachers
believed that their focus on academic English
gave all their studentsboth native and nonnative speakers of Englishan advantage on the
state test.
Teachers from the successful schools
reported that students were grouped by their
English language levels. The students received
at least 40 minutes of instruction daily in how
to read, write, and speak English. In contrast,
teachers at the unsuccessful schools did not
always group students by language levels and
said they taught English language development
when they had time. At successful schools,
students not making adequate progress in
English language acquisition received personal
intervention and additional instruction in a
pullout program.
In the successful schools, principals and
district ofce personnel were instrumental
in supporting all newly adopted district programs. At one successful elementary school, a
new English language development program
received far greater district support than the
unsuccessful schools received. In this particular
school, the district ofce paid for teacher training in the rst year of program implementation
and repeated the training yearly for all teachers
Small Study Group
For the rst time, I went to a meeting where I felt safe to share all the
problems I was having. I say things
in our cohort meeting that I would
never say when all the district principals get together.
Programs and Practices
Large Group
part of the culturethat assignment to low

socioeconomic schools was either an entrylevel position for new principals or a way of
penalizing them for being unable to effectively
handle parent conicts. Transferring from lower
to higher socioeconomic areas naturally represented a promotion.
A few districts changed this negative perception by placing principals alternately at highachieving schools and at state improvement
program schools. Experience at both types of
schools helped principals develop high expectations for their students academic achievement and increased the number of principals
who had rsthand knowledge of both types of
schools. The practice also fostered a new belief
that both kinds of schools offer opportunities
for professional growth.
Each of the eight principals interviewed for
the study stated that the workload and pressure
was greater for principals at low-performing
schools. Principals from the successful schools
said that their districts scheduled monthly
cohort meetings with all the districts state
improvement program schools. The principals
so valued these meetings that they have continued to meet two years after leaving the state
improvement program. Said one principal,
Small Study Group
Large Group
new to the district. Administrators also made

frequent classroom visits to verify consistent
implementation and provide additional materials or training if needed.
Students who performed below grade level
in language arts and mathematics at successful
schools were far more likely to receive intervention in addition to their regular instruction
than were students attending unsuccessful
schools. This additional instruction occurred
during the school day with credentialed teachers. One teacher in a successful school stated,
We used to have para-educators running the
intervention groups until we realized that we
needed our strongest teachers with our most
at-risk students. When students showed prociency in the targeted skills, they either exited
the intervention programs or received additional instruction in other weak skill areas.
Independent Study
Encouraging News
The results of this study support the research
studies of Mintrop (2003), Darling-Hammond
(1997), and Barth (1990), which suggest that
the solutions to improving education lie inside
the schoolhouse. Schools and districts can replicate the successful strategies discussed here if
they are willing to change in crucial ways.
One of the studys sample schools did
just that. The overcrowded urban elementary
school, with a student population of 1,119, is
on a year-round multitrack and has a staggered
schedule for 1st and 2nd grade. This schedule
requires two teachers and 40 students to share
a classroom for nearly two hours daily. Each
3rd through 6th grade class has 40 students
enrolled. Eighty percent of students are English
language learners, and 95 percent receive free
or reduced-price lunch. In the last four years,
the school has had three principals and a 40
percent turnover in teaching staff. In 2003, the
school moved to a temporary school site to
allow for the construction of new classrooms.
The school is scheduled to return to the original site sometime this year.
Despite the challenges, the school made its
growth targets for four consecutive years.
130
When asked how they transformed their

school from one that had the lowest test scores
in the state to one noted for sustained improvement in student achievement, teachers credited
changes in the district ofces support of the
school and changes in the schools instructional
practices and programs. We became very
focused, said one teacher. Another teacher
cited evidence that these efforts are working.
Now the teachers want to be here, she said.
Last year we only lost two teachers. A telling
comment made by a teacher revealed the staffs
optimistic view of the schools future:
When we return to the original
school site in 2005, we wont be
overcrowded and sharing classrooms. Were going to make even
bigger jumps in student learning.
Schools and districts can bring about student
achievement and sustain that achievement if
they are willing to examine their practices and
embrace change. All schools can replicate these
strategies and make improved education available to everyone.
References
Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Just, A. E., & Boese, L. E. (2002). Immediate intervention/underperforming schools program: How
Californias low-performing schools are continuing their efforts to improve student achievement
(Research Summary). Sacramento, CA: California
Department of Education Policy and Evaluation
Unit.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E.
(2001). Classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Mintrop, H. (2003). The limits of sanctions in lowperforming schools: A study of Maryland and
Kentucky schools on probation. Education Policy
Analysis Archives, 11(3), 32.
Valerie Chrisman is Director of District and School Support
Services at the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools
Ofce, Ventura, California; [email protected].
Activities
1. This article reinforces the idea that a major challenge of school improvement
is sustaining it year after year. What are the major challenges the article presents? To what extent are these challenges confronting your current school or
district?
4. What does the article suggest about the signicance of the principal in sustaining school success? To what extent do principals in your district reect
the experiences and background expertise identied in this article?
131
Independent Study
3. According to this article, why is teacher-based decision-making an essential

part of effective professional development?
Small Study Group
2. What are the processes related to teacher leadership cited by the author as
making a major difference in sustaining school improvement efforts? How
successfully has your school or district implemented the practices identied
by Valerie Chrisman?
Large Group
Guiding Questions for How Schools Sustain Success
Guiding Questions for How Schools Sustain Success (continued)

5. District ofce leadership is essential to sustaining school success, according
to the author. What practices related to district leadership does Chrisman
identify as having particular signicance for the school improvement planning process?
Small Study Group
Large Group
Independent Study
6. What programs and practices described by Chrismanparticularly those

related to students learning English as a second language and students who
are academically below grade levelhave parallels in your school or district?
Are there additions or modications in your current practices that you might
recommend?
7. Chrisman ends her article with Encouraging News. What is this news? What
are its implications for your school and district?
8. How do Chrismans recommendations and conclusions reect aspects of

Understanding by Design, especially the elements of the backward design
process?
132
Activities
Large Group
What Is a Professional Learning Community?

Richard DuFour
To create a professional learning community,

focus on learning rather than teaching, work
collaboratively, and hold yourself accountable
for results.
Big Idea #1: Ensuring That Students Learn
What do we want each student to learn?

How will we know when each student has
learned it?
Source: From What Is a Professional Learning Community? by R. DuFour, 2004, Educational Leadership, 61(8), 611.
133
Independent Study
The professional learning community model

ows from the assumption that the core mission of formal education is not simply to
ensure that students are taught but to ensure
that they learn. This simple shiftfrom a focus
on teaching to a focus on learninghas profound implications for schools.
School mission statements that promise
learning for all have become a clich. But
when a school staff takes that statement literallywhen teachers view it as a pledge to
ensure the success of each student rather than
as politically correct hyperboleprofound
changes begin to take place. The school staff
nds itself asking, What school characteristics and practices have been most successful
in helping all students achieve at high levels?
How could we adopt those characteristics and
practices in our own school? What commitments would we have to make to one another
to create such a school? What indicators could
we monitor to assess our progress? When the
staff has built shared knowledge and found
common ground on these questions, the school
has a solid foundation for moving forward with
its improvement initiative.
As the school moves forward, every professional in the building must engage with
colleagues in the ongoing exploration of three
crucial questions that drive the work of those
within a professional learning community:
Small Study Group
The idea of improving schools by developing

professional learning communities is currently
in vogue. People use this term to describe
every imaginable combination of individuals
with an interest in educationa grade-level
teaching team, a school committee, a high
school department, an entire school district, a
state department of education, a national professional organization, and so on. In fact, the
term has been used so ubiquitously that it is in
danger of losing all meaning.
The professional learning community model
has now reached a critical juncture, one well
known to those who have witnessed the fate
of other well-intentioned school reform efforts.
In this all-too-familiar cycle, initial enthusiasm
gives way to confusion about the fundamental concepts driving the initiative, followed
by inevitable implementation problems, the
conclusion that the reform has failed to bring
about the desired results, abandonment of the
reform, and the launch of a new search for
the next promising initiative. Another reform
movement has come and gone, reinforcing the
conventional education wisdom that promises,
This too shall pass.
The movement to develop professional
learning communities can avoid this cycle,
but only if educators reect critically on the
concepts merits. What are the big ideas that
represent the core principles of professional
learning communities? How do these principles
guide schools efforts to sustain the professional
learning community model until it becomes

deeply embedded in the culture of the school?
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
How will we respond when a student

experiences difculty in learning?
The answer to the third question separates
learning communities from traditional schools.
Here is a scenario that plays out daily in
traditional schools. A teacher teaches a unit to
the best of his or her ability, but at the conclusion of the unit some students have not mastered the essential outcomes. On the one hand,
the teacher would like to take the time to help
those students. On the other hand, the teacher
feels compelled to move forward to cover the
course content. If the teacher uses instructional
time to assist students who have not learned,
the progress of students who have mastered
the content will suffer; if the teacher pushes on
with new concepts, the struggling students will
fall farther behind.
What typically happens in this situation?
Almost invariably, the school leaves the solution to the discretion of individual teachers,
who vary widely in the ways they respond.
Some teachers conclude that the struggling students should transfer to a less rigorous course
or should be considered for special education.
Some lower their expectations by adopting less
challenging standards for subgroups of students
within their classrooms. Some look for ways
to assist the students before and after school.
Some allow struggling students to fail.
When a school begins to function as a professional learning community, however, teachers become aware of the incongruity between
their commitment to ensure learning for all students and their lack of a coordinated strategy
to respond when some students do not learn.
The staff addresses this discrepancy by designing strategies to ensure that struggling students
receive additional time and support, no matter who their teacher is. In addition to being
systematic and schoolwide, the professional
learning communitys response to students who
experience difculty is
Timely. The school quickly identies
students who need additional time and
support.
134
Based on intervention rather than remediation. The plan provides students with help as
soon as they experience difculty rather than
relying on summer school, retention, and
remedial courses.
Directive. Instead of inviting students to
seek additional help, the systematic plan
requires students to devote extra time and
receive additional assistance until they have
mastered the necessary concepts.
The systematic, timely, and directive intervention program operating at Adlai Stevenson
High School in Lincolnshire, Illinois, provides
an excellent example. Every three weeks, every
student receives a progress report. Within the
rst month of school, new students discover
that if they are not doing well in a class, they
will receive a wide array of immediate interventions. First, the teacher, counselor, and faculty
advisor each talk with the student individually
to help resolve the problem. The school also
noties the students parents about the concern.
In addition, the school offers the struggling student a pass from study hall to a school tutoring
center to get additional help in the course. An
older student mentor, in conjunction with the
struggling students advisor, helps the student
with homework during the students daily advisory period.
Any student who continues to fall short of
expectations at the end of six weeks despite
these interventions is required, rather than
invited, to attend tutoring sessions during the
study hall period. Counselors begin to make
weekly checks on the struggling students progress. If tutoring fails to bring about improvement within the next six weeks, the student is
assigned to a daily guided study hall with 10 or
fewer students. The guided study hall supervisor communicates with classroom teachers to
learn exactly what homework each student
needs to complete and monitors the completion of that homework. Parents attend a meeting at the school at which the student, parents,
counselor, and classroom teacher must sign a
contract clarifying what each party will do to
Ac ti v i ti e s
At Boones Mill Elementary School, a K5

school serving 400 students in rural Franklin
County, Virginia, the powerful collaboration of
grade-level teams drives the school improvement process. The following scenario describes
what Boones Mill staff members refer to as
their teaching-learning process.
The schools ve 3rd grade teachers study
state and national standards, the district curriculum guide, and student achievement data
to identify the essential knowledge and skills
that all students should learn in an upcoming
language arts unit. They also ask the 4th grade
teachers what they hope students will have
mastered by the time they leave 3rd grade. On
the basis of the shared knowledge generated
by this joint study, the 3rd grade team agrees
on the critical outcomes that they will make
sure each student achieves during the unit.
Next, the team turns its attention to developing common formative assessments to
monitor each students mastery of the essential
outcomes. Team members discuss the most
authentic and valid ways to assess student
mastery. They set the standard for each skill or
concept that each student must achieve to be
deemed procient. They agree on the criteria
by which they will judge the quality of student
work, and they practice applying those criteria
until they can do so consistently. Finally, they
decide when they will administer the assessments.
After each teacher has examined the results
of the common formative assessment for his
or her students, the team analyzes how all 3rd
graders performed. Team members identify
strengths and weaknesses in student learning
and begin to discuss how they can build on
the strengths and address the weaknesses. The
entire team gains new insights into what is
working and what is not, and members discuss
new strategies that they can implement in their
classrooms to raise student achievement.
135
Independent Study
Educators who are building a professional

learning community recognize that they must
work together to achieve their collective purpose of learning for all. Therefore, they create
structures to promote a collaborative culture.
Despite compelling evidence indicating that
working collaboratively represents best practice, teachers in many schools continue to work
in isolation. Even in schools that endorse the
idea of collaboration, the staffs willingness to
collaborate often stops at the classroom door.
Some school staffs equate the term collaboration with congeniality and focus on building
group camaraderie. Other staffs join forces to
develop consensus on operational procedures,
such as how they will respond to tardiness or
supervise recess. Still others organize themselves into committees to oversee different facets of the schools operation, such as discipline,
technology, and social climate. Although each
of these activities can serve a useful purpose,
none represents the kind of professional dialogue that can transform a school into a professional learning community.
The powerful collaboration that characterizes professional learning communities is a
systematic process in which teachers work
together to analyze and improve their classroom practice. Teachers work in teams, engaging in an ongoing cycle of questions that
promote deep team learning. This process, in
Collaborating for School Improvement
Small Study Group
Big Idea #2: A Culture of Collaboration
turn, leads to higher levels of student achievement.
Large Group
help the student meet the standards for the

course.
Stevenson High School serves more than
4,000 students. Yet this school has found a way
to monitor each students learning on a timely
basis and to ensure that every student who
experiences academic difculty will receive
extra time and support for learning.
Like Stevenson, schools that are truly committed to the concept of learning for each
student will stop subjecting struggling students
to a haphazard education lottery. These schools
will guarantee that each student receives whatever additional support he or she needs.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
also give teachers time to analyze and discuss

state and district curriculum documents. More
important, teacher conversations must quickly
move beyond What are we expected to teach?
to How will we know when each student has
learned?
In addition, faculties must stop making
excuses for failing to collaborate. Few educators publicly assert that working in isolation is
the best strategy for improving schools. Instead,
they give reasons why it is impossible for them
to work together: We just cant nd the time.
Not everyone on the staff has endorsed the
idea. We need more training in collaboration.
But the number of schools that have created
truly collaborative cultures proves that such
barriers are not insurmountable. As Roland
Barth (1991) wrote,
At Boones Mill, collaborative conversations

happen routinely throughout the year. Teachers
use frequent formative assessments to investigate the questions Are students learning what
they need to learn? and Who needs additional
time and support to learn? rather than relying solely on summative assessments that ask
Which students learned what was intended
and which students did not?
Collaborative conversations call on team
members to make public what has traditionally been privategoals, strategies, materials,
pacing, questions, concerns, and results. These
discussions give every teacher someone to turn
to and talk to, and they are explicitly structured
to improve the classroom practice of teachersindividually and collectively.
For teachers to participate in such a powerful process, the school must ensure that
everyone belongs to a team that focuses on
student learning. Each team must have time
to meet during the workday and throughout
the school year. Teams must focus their efforts
on crucial questions related to learning and
generate products that reect that focus, such
as lists of essential outcomes, different kinds of
assessment, analyses of student achievement,
and strategies for improving results. Teams
must develop norms or protocols to clarify
expectations regarding roles, responsibilities,
and relationships among team members. Teams
must adopt student achievement goals linked
with school and district goals.
In the nal analysis, building the collaborative culture of a professional learning community is a question of will. A group of staff
members who are determined to work together
will nd a way.
Removing Barriers to Success
Big Idea #3: A Focus on Results
For meaningful collaboration to occur, a number of things must also stop happening. Schools
must stop pretending that merely presenting
teachers with state standards or district curriculum guides will guarantee that all students have
access to a common curriculum. Even school
districts that devote tremendous time and
energy to designing the intended curriculum
often pay little attention to the implemented
curriculum (what teachers actually teach) and
even less to the attained curriculum (what
students learn) (Marzano, 2003). Schools must
Professional learning communities judge their

effectiveness on the basis of results. Working together to improve student achievement
becomes the routine work of everyone in the
school. Every teacher team participates in an
ongoing process of identifying the current level
of student achievement, establishing a goal to
improve the current level, working together
to achieve that goal, and providing periodic
evidence of progress. The focus of team goals
shifts. Such goals as We will adopt the Junior
Great Books program or We will create three
136
Are teachers and administrators willing to accept the fact that they are
part of the problem? . . . God didnt
create self-contained classrooms, 50minute periods, and subjects taught
in isolation. We didbecause we
nd working alone safer than and
preferable to working together. (pp.
126127)
Ac ti v i ti e s
Even the grandest design eventually translates

into hard work. The professional learning community model is a grand designa powerful
new way of working together that profoundly
137
Independent Study
Hard Work and Commitment
Small Study Group
item. The teachers share their results from all

of these assessments with their colleagues, and
they quickly learn when a teammate has been
particularly effective in teaching a certain skill.
Team members consciously look for successful
practice and attempt to replicate it in their own
practice; they also identify areas of the curriculum that need more attention.
Freeport Intermediate has been transformed
from one of the lowest-performing schools
in the state to a national model for academic
achievement. Principal Clara Sale-Davis believes
that the crucial rst step in that transformation
came when the staff began to honestly confront data on student achievement and to work
together to improve results rather than make
excuses for them.
Of course, this focus on continual improvement and results requires educators to change
traditional practices and revise prevalent
assumptions. Educators must begin to embrace
data as a useful indicator of progress. They
must stop disregarding or excusing unfavorable
data and honestly confront the sometimesbrutal facts. They must stop using averages
to analyze student performance and begin to
focus on the success of each student.
Educators who focus on results must also
stop limiting improvement goals to factors
outside the classroom, such as student discipline and staff morale, and shift their attention
to goals that focus on student learning. They
must stop assessing their own effectiveness on
the basis of how busy they are or how many
new initiatives they have launched and begin
instead to ask, Have we made progress on the
goals that are most important to us? Educators
must stop working in isolation and hoarding
their ideas, materials, and strategies and begin
to work together to meet the needs of all
students.
Large Group
new labs for our science course give way to

We will increase the percentage of students
who meet the state standard in language arts
from 83 percent to 90 percent or We will
reduce the failure rate in our course by 50
percent.
Schools and teachers typically suffer from
the DRIP syndromeData Rich/Information
Poor. The results-oriented professional learning
community not only welcomes data but also
turns data into useful and relevant information
for staff. Teachers have never suffered from
a lack of data. Even a teacher who works in
isolation can easily establish the mean, mode,
median, standard deviation, and percentage
of students who demonstrated prociency
every time he or she administers a test. However, data will become a catalyst for improved
teacher practice only if the teacher has a basis
of comparison.
When teacher teams develop common
formative assessments throughout the school
year, each teacher can identify how his or her
students performed on each skill compared
with other students. Individual teachers can call
on their team colleagues to help them reect
on areas of concern. Each teacher has access
to the ideas, materials, strategies, and talents of
the entire team.
Freeport Intermediate School, located 50
miles south of Houston, Texas, attributes its
success to an unrelenting focus on results.
Teachers work in collaborative teams for 90
minutes daily to clarify the essential outcomes
of their grade levels and courses and to align
those outcomes with state standards. They
develop consistent instructional calendars and
administer the same brief assessment to all students at the same grade level at the conclusion
of each instructional unit, roughly once a week.
Each quarter, the teams administer a common cumulative exam. Each spring, the teams
develop and administer practice tests for the
state exam. Each year, the teams pore over the
results of the state test, which are broken down
to show every teacher how his or her students
performed on every skill and on every test
affects the practices of schooling. But initiating

and sustaining the concept requires hard work.
It requires the school staff to focus on learning rather than teaching, work collaboratively
on matters related to learning, and hold itself
accountable for the kind of results that fuel
continual improvement.
When educators do the hard work necessary
to implement these principles, their collective
ability to help all students learn will rise. If they
fail to demonstrate the discipline to initiate and
sustain this work, then their school is unlikely
to become more effective, even if those within
it claim to be a professional learning community. The rise or fall of the professional learning community concept depends not on the
merits of the concept itself, but on the most
important element in the improvement of any

schoolthe commitment and persistence of the
educators within it.
References
Barth, R. (1991). Restructuring schools: Some questions for teachers and principals. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(2), 123128.
Marzano, R. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Richard DuFour recently retired as Superintendent of Adlai
Stevenson High School in Lincolnshire, Illinois. He currently resides in Moneta, Virginia, and may be reached at
(540) 721-4662; [email protected]. His forthcoming book is Whatever It Takes: How a Professional Learning
Community Responds When Kids Dont Learn (National
Educational Service, in press).
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
138
Activities
1. What is a professional learning community, according to author Richard

DuFour? To what extent does your school or district reect the values and
practices he identies?
Small Study Group
2. DuFour begins his article by asserting: To create a professional learning

community, focus on learning rather than teaching, work collaboratively, and
hold yourself accountable for results. What does he mean by each of these
recommendations? How do these ideas align with Understanding by Design
and the backward design process?
Large Group
Guiding Questions for What Is a Professional Learning Community?
Independent Study
3. How does DuFour suggest that educators move from the promise of learning for all as a clich toward genuine and sustained organizational practice?
What are the specic recommendations he makes to help ensure the achievement of this goal?
139
Guiding Questions for What Is a Professional Learning Community?

(continued)
4. How does DuFour suggest the schools achieve a culture of collaboration?
To what extent do schools with which you are familiar reect his principles?
Small Study Group
Large Group
Independent Study
5. School improvement, according to DuFour, requires effective and sustained

collaboration. How do DuFours suggestions in this area align with current
practices in your school or district?
6. How can professional learning communities remove barriers to success,

according to DuFour?
7. A major recommendation presented by DuFour is the commitment to focus

on results. What practices and processes does DuFour emphasize? What parallels can you identify related to Understanding by Designs backward design
process?
140
Activities
Large Group
Pathways to Reform: Start with Values

David J. Ferrero
Educators deeply held philosophical beliefs

point to many diverse pathways, all leading to
school excellence.
Belief Systems and Practice
141
Independent Study
One crucial but often overlooked source of the

distinctiveness among high-performing schools
is philosophythe beliefs and values that create
our sense of what makes life worth living, and
therefore what is worth teaching and how we
should teach it. In our drive to be researchbased, we tend to forget that between the
science of learning and the practice of teaching
lie important value judgments that color our
reading of the research and the implications for
practice we derive from it. These value judgments reect deeply held philosophical worldviews.
Few of us went into education out of a
burning desire to raise students test scores. We
went into it out of a deep sense of whats good
for kids and society, whats worth knowing and
thinking about, what it means to be a good
citizen and personindeed, what it means to
lead a good life. Philosophy matters.
In fact, educations ercest and most intractable conicts have stemmed from differences
Source: From Pathways to Reform: Start with Values, by D. J. Ferrero, 2005, Educational Leadership, 62(5), 814. Copyright
Small Study Group
The Northtown Academy campus of Chicago

International Charter School (CICS) combines a
commitment to classical learning with innovative citizenship education grounded in public
debate. KIPP Academies rely on academic pressure and tough love to help students meet state
standards. At Withrow University High School
in Cincinnati, Ohio, students wear uniforms
and boys and girls attend separate classes. The
Francis Parker Charter School in Harvard, Massachusetts, boasts a democratic-communitarian
ethic in which students take an active role in
school governance and pursue learning through
thematic group projects. Students at The Met in
Providence, Rhode Island, pursue a curriculum
composed entirely of self-designed projects
and internships. At the Oakland School for
Social Justice and Community Development in
Oakland, California, students learn community
organizing and critical theory. And at High Tech
High in San Diego, California, students pursue
project-based courses of study keyed to careers
in technology industries.
These are just seven of the many great small
high schools that I have had the privilege of
getting to know through my work at the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation. These schools differ
profoundly in their curriculum, instruction, and
culture. An individual teacher or student might
feel at home in one or a few of these schools,
but certainly not in all of them. Yet these small
schools have important things in common.
They all have high percentages of minority and
low-income students. They all strive to offer
students a supportive, rigorous, and coherent
learning environment in compliance with state

standards. They all aim to prepare students for
higher education, work, and citizenship.
Common ends, diverse pathways. School
reformers have embraced this vision, but we
still face the question of how to achieve it. We
know most of the structural conditions necessary to make such a vision a reality: site-based
autonomy, family and faculty choice, performance-based accountability, data-driven decision making, and research-based practice. But
these structural features only get us so far. They
explain what these schools have in common,
but they dont account for what makes them
distinctive.
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
in philosophy. Take the 100 Years War between

progressives and traditionalists.1 To oversimplify an already oversimplied dichotomy,
progressives incline toward pedagogical
approaches that start with student interests
and emphasize hands-on engagement with the
physical and social environments, whereas traditionalists tend to start with pre-existing canons of inquiry and knowledge and emphasize
ideas and concepts mediated through words
and symbols.
The evolution of these differences is not
grounded in science, but in history, philosophy,
and ideology. So-called progressivism evolved
over the 19th and 20th centuries out of a
complex interaction of romanticism, socialism,
pragmatism, and progressive politics. So-called
traditionalism has Aristotelian origins refracted
through Renaissance humanism and later
through romanticism, as well as pre-libertarian
forms of conservatism. The former could be
described as populist, small-d democratic, and
attuned to the ux of modern life; the latter
could be characterized as aristocratic, small-r
republican, and attentive to the continuities that
underlie and inuence modern change.
Notice that romanticism appears as a source
for both philosophies. This is not the only point
of overlap. Education progressives and traditionalists from the 19th century to the present
have shared certain overarching perspectives.
For example, all espouse liberal democratic
values inherited from the Enlightenment, such
as rights, liberty, and popular government. All
subscribe to a developmental theory of childhood and learning. All strive to produce young
adults who are good citizens, caring people,
critical thinkers, and productive contributors to
the economy. All believe that learning should
be relevant to students. They simply disagree
about the exact meaning of these ideals and
their curricular and pedagogical implications.
Does a relevant education start with student
interests and backgrounds, current needs of the
job market, and current events? Or should we
teach students to recognize the relevance of
142
ancient Greek thought, the Copernican revolution, and Shakespeares soliloquies?

How can we devise a study to adjudicate
these different views empirically? We cant.
Normative questions are not easily settled by
empirical means because our normative points
of view color how we understand empirical
evidence.
Not that empirical research is meaningless.
On the contrary, research has produced many
insights that help us distinguish between good
teaching and bad. We know, for example, that
the mind constructs knowledgethat people
learn by connecting new information to existing understandings and conceptual frameworks. We know that teaching needs to attend
to both basic and higher-order skills, and to
both cognitive and noncognitive development.
We know that students learn best in safe, challenging, personally supportive, and authoritative communities.
These ndings, however, must be interpreted and translated into practice. For some
educators, constructivist learning theory justies
discovery learning driven by student interests;
for others, it merely describes what happens
whenever a learners brain takes in information, even passively through a lecture. Which
interpretation is correct? On this question and
many others, even the most rigorous and credible research provides little guidance.
Within the bounds of shared values and
research-based principles lie a range of legitimate practices, and between science and
practice lie a number of judgments that are
irreducibly values-based. This idea was once
cause for concern, because it belied the quest
for the single code of best practices that
would certify teachers as true professionals. But
we need not view the inuence of philosophical values as an embarrassment anymore. As
reformers and education professionals have
moved away from large, tracked, one-size-tsall comprehensive schools and toward small,
focused schools of choice that offer multiple
pathways to postsecondary opportunity, we
have begun to recognize what should have
Ac ti v i ti e s
Reecting on Key Questions
143
Independent Study
Small Study Group
From time to time we remind ourselves about

the importance of values, beliefs, and culture
to education. But we are not conditioned
to take them seriously in our deliberations
about what schools should be. We need help,
because enabling educators, parents, and other
constituents to be more articulate about their
convictions and the philosophical judgments
behind them is a crucial step in forming effective learning communities. This step involves
answering key questions both individually and
collectively.
The following questions can help educators
and their constituencies organize into philosophically and pedagogically coherent learning
communities. The process of reecting on these
questions is especially useful for groups of educators who are creating new, small high school
learning communities, such as schools-withinschools, but it applies to any school community
striving to transform practice around shared
goals.
What motivated me to go into teaching? We
all know that teaching is a vocation. We dont
do it for money or glory, but for some intrinsic
reward. Was it a passion for a particular subject? A social service mission? A desire to help
young people realize individual talents? This
gut check will tease out your deep motivation
and basic orientation toward practice.
What do I think students should know and
be able to do? We need to answer this question
as concretely as possible; otherwise everyones
answers will sound the same. We all believe
in developing students literacy, mathematical facility, critical thinking, citizenship, workforce competence, and commitment to lifelong
learning. This level of collective afrmation is
important; it reminds us that whatever our differences, we are ultimately on the same side.
But these broad values need to be unpacked
with more pointed questions.
To become literate, what kinds of books

should students read, and why? What should
be the ratio of printed text to other media?
Who should choose the mediumstudent or
teacher? Which comes rst in teaching literacy
decoding skills or comprehension? What
should take priority in teaching mathematicsnumeric manipulations or mathematical reasoning? Regarding science, is it OK if
students graduate from high school without
knowing what gravity is as long as they have
mastered the scientic method? When it comes
to citizenship, does living in a North Atlantic
democracy like the United States mean that
a student should leave school with a deep
knowledge of the history and traditions that
made North Atlantic democracies possible, or
do immigration and globalization necessitate a
more multicultural curriculum?
Notice that many of the foregoing are questions of priority rather than forced choices.
Most sober educators would argue both in
many instancesat least in the abstract. But
priorities imply choices and different ways
to organize learning. Our broad afrmations
of consensus values usually degenerate into
unproductive bickering when the hard work of
constructing an instructional program begins.
Who are the inuences on my education
philosophy? Because our deep motivations
and priorities tend to form without conscious
reection, they often remain inchoate. One
good way to become articulate fast is to read.
I would start with books that survey thought
and debate about education in a schematized
way. My favorites, because of their clarity and
even-handedness, are Gerald Guteks textbookish but readable Philosophical and Ideological
Voices in Education (Allyn and Bacon, 2004)
and Herbert Kliebards The Struggle for the
American Curriculum, 18931958 (Routledge,
1995). Such books will furnish your group
members with a common vocabulary and
framework for situating themselves in the landscape of modern education thought.
Most participants will identify quickly with
certain philosophies. They can then choose
Large Group
been obvious all along: There are many ways

for a school to be good (see Cuban, 2000).
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
from a menu of books that represent and

develop those points of view. (See Readings
on Vision for a selection.) Browse around for
Readings on Vision
One way to become more articulate
about ones deep motivations is to read
the books of authors who have formally
expressed kindred beliefs and translated
them into ideal school models. Below, a
small sample of readings represents the
range of thought within the traditionalist
and progressive visions.
Traditionalist
Mortimer J. Adler, The Paideia Proposal (Macmillan, 1982).
Jacques Barzun, A Jacques Barzun
Reader (HarperCollins, 2001).
Earl Shorris, Riches for the Poor (W. W.
Norton & Company, 2000).
E. D. Hirsch Jr., Cultural Literacy (Vintage, 1988).
Lisa Delpit, Other Peoples Children
(New Press, 1996).
William J. Bennett, Curriculum for
American Students (Diane Publishing
Company, 1988).
Progressive
Deborah Meier, The Power of Their
Ideas (Beacon Press, 1996).
Theodore R. Sizer, Horaces School
(Mariner Books, 1997).
Eliot Levine, One Kid at a Time
(Teachers College Press, 2001).
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the
Oppressed (Continuum International
Publishing Group; 30th Anniversary edition, 2000).
George S. Counts, Dare the School
Build a New Social Order? (Southern
Illinois University Press, 1978).
David Stern et al., Career Academies
( Jossey-Bass, 1992).
144
the book that gets you most excited, and pay

close attention to its vision of the ideal school.
Chances are that the kind of school the book
describes or suggests is the kind of school in
which you would feel most fullled.
Which colleagues share my vision? Once people have made their initial self-identications,
they might want to do their vision readings
together with like-minded colleagues. Teachers in a school probably know some colleagues
well and have already gravitated toward those
who share certain core beliefs about their work.
Forming reading groups on the basis of these
afnities can extend and deepen those networks, help members develop a shared normative vocabulary, and form the basis of design
groups for small schools or school-within-aschool learning communities.
What do parents, students, and local citizens
want, need, and believe? Ideally, other constituents would engage in the same exploration that teachers and administrators do. If that
proves unrealistic, the school should conduct
some kind of outreach to ascertain the degree
to which parents and students share the points
of view that emerge among educators. Reaching out to the community early helps create
broad ownership and ensures that there will be
demand for the learning communities that are
likely to grow out of this exercise.
Initially these reective and deliberative
exercises will be self-initiated and self-guided
hence the heavy dose of reading. School
change consultants, coaches, and workshop
leaders are no more procient at disentangling
the empirical from the normative than the
typical faculty. In fact, like most of us, education consultants are so habituated to reading
research through the lens of their own normative value systems that they are more likely to
steer school communities in a preferred direction than to help them identify their own direction. After the nascent learning communities
have organized themselves, they can choose
consultants with more care and begin the usual
planning efforts.
Ac ti v i ti e s
145
Independent Study
Small Study Group
The shift to a true system of distinct pathways

for students will likely heighten anxiety over
certain issues. When we introduce candid talk
about values and pluralism, the following questions are likely to arise almost immediately.
Wont this lead to segregation? It certainly
can. Suppose that after deliberation, educators
and parents at a comprehensive high school
agree to create the following four small learning communities: a womens leadership school,
an International Baccalaureate (IB) school,
a high-tech school, and a school of African
American and Latin American Studies. Each
small school reects a signicant group of
constituents within the existing school, among
whom it enjoys strong support. But the womens leadership school will draw more girls, the
IB school more afuent Asian American and
white students, the high-tech school (probably) more boys, and the African American and
Latin American Studies school more black and
Hispanic students.
It is possible to mitigate this problem, but
not to eliminate it. Educators and other constituents must address up-front how much separation by race, gender, and aptitude they are
willing to tolerate. If the tolerance is low, then
schools that explicitly target gender, cultural,
or racial groups will prove too divisive; the
planners must rule out womens leadership and
African American and Latin American Studies
schools and recognize that authentically integrating IB and high-tech schools will require
aggressive outreach. If constituents are willing
to accept less-than-perfectly-integrated schools
in the interest of better serving different constituencies and drawing on teacher strengths,
it will be crucial to monitor those schools for
resource equity and academic quality and to
provide students with frequent opportunities
to interact meaningfully with students from the
other learning communities.
What about the common school? Underneath
the anxiety over segregation lies the ideal of
the common school as a crucible where children of diverse backgrounds come together to
forge a common citizenry. If we allow schools

to reect our pluralism, what institution will
bind us together as a people?
This question, although important, underestimates the degree to which both research and
consensus values can enforce certain common
goals and common learning for all students,
regardless of school type. We should prohibit
all schools from teaching anti-liberal values,
such as ethnic hatred or the rejection of secular
government; we should require all schools to
teach the principles of the U.S. Constitution and
to provide civic education that goes beyond the
minimal expectations of tolerance and cooperation. But schools need latitude with regard
to how they accomplish these goals. Some
will emphasize service learning, others critical
theory, and still others immersion in the traditions of Western political thought. All of these
approaches reect credible ways of thinking
about democratic citizenship.
Those who still recoil at the thought of
schools designed to teach different things in
different ways to different kids might ask themselves this: Do I want a national curriculum?
Not my national curriculum, but the one wed
likely get if one were developed? The United
States has rejected a national curriculum for
good reasons, and these include the pedagogical pluralism weve been exploring (see Gardner, 2000, pp. 222228).
If we base pedagogical choices on value
judgments, wont we undermine teacher professionalism? For a century now, educators have
sought recognition as a profession on par
with medicineself-governing, restrictive with
respect to who can practice, and scientically
based. This aspiration has abetted the suppression of philosophical differences in education
decision making by derogating these differences as ideology and politics. If only we
could eliminate such distractions, say the professionalizers, we could enact evidence-based
policy and practice. But as we have seen, the
research isnt enough.
Acknowledging that teaching isnt a science in no way implies that it isnt a profession
Large Group
Grappling with Dilemmas
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
that requires considerable apprenticeship and

skill to perform well. There remains a body of
empirical evidence that teachers must internalize, and centuries of accumulated craft knowledge that they must master. Between the ideal
of the teacher-as-physician and the notion that
anyone with a bachelors degree, a high SAT
verbal score, and a clean arrest record can
teach lies a craft model of professionalism that
upholds rigorous quality standards while honoring diverse approaches. A more philosophically informed self-understanding can help the
profession ourish within this zone.
Recognizing the value judgments that both
guide research and color the multiple legitimate
inferences that we draw from it could generate
several favorable outcomes for the education
profession. First, such recognition would defuse
a lot of the internecine bickeringthe Reading Wars, Math Wars, Culture Warsthat make
us look silly and faddish to outsiders. Second,
it would facilitate the formation of communities of practice capable of developing coherent courses of study in settings where parents,
students, and teachers share a common understanding of the enterpriseall qualities associated with teacher satisfaction, parent approval,
and high student achievement. Third, the
resulting system would require certain policies
that educators have long championedsuch
as site-based autonomy, streamlined performance standards, and exible approaches to
state assessmentbecause multiple pathways
depend on an accountability system supple
enough to support all of them.
If we allow educators to organize schools
around coherent philosophies, wont those educators be imposing adult values on students? We
like to tell ourselves that schooling is about the
kids, not the adults, and that the needs of the
former must trump those of the latter. Hence
we navely strive for a pose of dispassionate
diagnosis and treatment in our work and advocacy. But whether we like it or not, schooling is
an extension of child-rearing. Were not aiming
to produce high test scores; were striving to
146
create good people. This aspiration is by denition normative.

Take the goal of helping students become
autonomous, self-governing personsthe same
goal that makes us uncomfortable imposing adult values on them. The importance we
assign to personal autonomy itself reects a
philosophical point of view stemming from our
liberal democratic worldview. In many cultures,
past and present, qualities such as deference to
elders and loyalty to tribe or nation have held
higher priority. So the expectation that children
grow up to be autonomous and critical is itself
an imposition of values. Were fooling ourselves
if we think we can meet our highest aspirations
for students without seeking to shape them
according to a normative ideal.
Isnt conict educative? If we permit students
to self-segregate on the basis of education
philosophyto attend schools where everyone else shares their valueswont we deprive
students of exposure to differing points of
view? This would be a serious drawback. But it
overstates the case Ive been arguing.
First, theres a practical limit to how far we
can take this. If our goal were to form learning communities where everyone agreed on all
normative questions, we would end up with
universal homeschoolingand even that would
work only until children were old enough to
start questioning their parents worldviews.
But theres a more principled reply: The point
here is not to create homogeneous communities of value, but rather to create homogeneity
with respect to certain core beliefs concerning
curriculum, instruction, norms of comportment,
and civic virtue. This arrangement leaves plenty
of room for students to encounter diverse
points of view on substantive matters. Every
philosophy of education, every approach to
every curriculum, generates disagreements and
provides a shared framework for deliberations
about them.
Diversity as Opportunity
I recognize how strange all this talk about
philosophy and pluralism must sound. We
Ac ti v i ti e s
Cuban, L. (2000). Why is it so hard to get good

schools? In D. Shipps & L. Cuban (Eds.), Reconstructing the common good in education (pp.
148172). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gardner, H. (2000). The disciplined mind: Beyond
facts and standardized tests, the K12 education that every child deserves. New York: Penguin
Books.
Endnote
1
I dislike the terms progressive and traditionalist because they paper over a lot of diversity
and disagreement that exist within the two
philosophies. Of the seven schools mentioned
in my introduction, three are traditional and
four are progressive, but all are philosophically
and pedagogically distinctin many cases,
profoundly.
Small Study Group
David J. Ferrero, a former high school teacher, is Director

of Education Research and Evaluation at the Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation, 1551 Eastlake Ave., Seattle, WA 98115;
206-709-3454; [email protected].
Independent Study
References
Large Group
have become so accustomed to thinking of

our work as a service commodity, in which
adult professionals provide student-clients with
diagnoses and treatments, that we sometimes
forget that schooling is always and inevitably
about cultivating persons. Not that the standards movement is misguided, or that we dont
need research to guide practice. Both common
standards and research, along with certain
broadly shared societal ideals, help us dene
good schooling and provide necessary limits to
diversity. But these boundaries still admit a rich
variety of approaches.
The move to small, distinctive schools of
choice provides an opportunity to exploit that
richness. Such schools will not make a difference if their goal is merely diversity for diversitys sake. Rather, we should treat the creation
of these schools as a means to enhance the
reectiveness of educators, develop authoritative communities of practice, provide meaningful options for families, and improve academic,
civic, and personal outcomes for young people.
147
Guiding Questions for Pathways to Reform: Start with Values

1. David Ferrero suggests that one crucial but often overlooked source of the
distinctiveness among high-performing schools is philosophythe beliefs and
values that create our sense of what makes life worth living, and therefore
what is worth teaching and how we should teach it. To what extent do the
staff members in your school or district share a common philosophy of education?
2. Like Understanding by Design, Ferreros recommendations for school

improvement emphasize the power and value of reecting on key questions.
What are the essential questions the author presents to help educators and
their constituencies organize into philosophically and pedagogically coherent
learning communities?
Small Study Group
Large Group
Independent Study
3. How do Ferreros key questions align with the principles of Understanding

by Design and the backward design process?
4. What questions does the author suggest are likely to arise almost immediately when educators introduce candid talk about values and pluralism? How have the questions presented in this section of the article been
addressed by your school or district?
5. Ferrero emphasizes throughout this article the signicance, power, and challenge of values as a key element underlying educational decision-making
and school improvement planning. How is the movement toward consensusdriven values affecting your school or district?
6. Why does Ferrero place so much emphasis on vision? How does the author
justify the following statement at the conclusion of his article: Both common standards and research, along with societal ideals, help us dene good
schooling and provide necessary limits to diversity. But these boundaries still
admit a rich variety of approaches.
148
Ac ti v i ti e s
Large Group
Leadership for Lasting Reform

Linda Lambert
Principals and teachers travel through three

phases as their schools build high leadership
capacity that sustains improvement.
Some colleagues and I recently set out to discover how 15 schools made the journey toward
Source: From Leadership for Lasting Reform, by L. Lambert, 2005, Educational Leadership, 62(5), 6265. Copyright 2005 by
149
Independent Study
Study of High Leadership Capacity Schools
Small Study Group
A number of years ago, as I anticipated my

fourth and nal year as principal of San Jose
Middle School in Novato, California, vice principal Joel Montero and I discussed our concern
about the sustainability of the good work that
members of the school community had done
together. Teacher leadership in the school was
strongbut was it strong enough to survive a
major change in administration?
To ease the transition, Joel and I decided to
switch many of our roles. During that school
year, I found out how difcult the job of vice
principal was. And Joel prepared himself magnicently for the principalship that he assumed
the following September. For the next 15 years,
every principal at San Jose Middle School came
from within the school. San Jose continues
to be at the forefront of school improvement
today.
In the meantime, as I moved on to other
administrative roles, the challenge of sustainability continued to intrigue me. What had
been the pathway to sustainable school excellence at San Jose? Did other successful schools
follow the same pathway? Working with
thousands of school leaders over the years as
an instructor, coach, advisor, and presenter, I
have encountered the same question again and
again: Once you create a great school, how
do you maintain a close approximation of that
high quality for the long term?
high leadership capacity, which we dened as

broad-based, skillful participation in the work
of leadership.1 I had worked personally with
some of the schools in the study; other schools
were nominated by colleagues working with
initiatives that emphasized the characteristics
of high leadership capacity schools. We gathered information for the study by visiting the
schools and interviewing principals and teachers. Through a set of open-ended questions, we
invited participants to describe the leadership
capacity of their schools, including obstacles
and factors affecting sustainability. In two daylong conversations, our group of researchers
identied patterns, made inferences, and drew
conclusions about what promotes high leadership capacity.
The participating schools were located in
North Carolina, Ohio, Missouri, Kansas, Texas,
California, Washington, and Alberta, Canada.
They included 3 high schools, 1 junior high
school, and 11 elementary schools. All shared
key elements related to leadership capacity. At
each school, a system of shared governance
and distributed leadership supported a dynamic
leadership culture built around a vision-driven,
student-focused conceptual framework for
school improvement. Student performance data
served as the heart of each schools inquiry
approach to school improvement. Each school
had design featuresstructures, processes, and
rolesthat promoted leadership capacity.
Most of the schools in the study were urban
and high-poverty. One-third of them had
consistently been high-performing schools
and continued to show improvement; twothirds had transformed themselves from lowperforming schools to successful schools in
the last few years. Some had hit bottom and
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
had nowhere to go but up. For example, in

1999, Vantage Elementary2 earned 315one of
the lowest ratings in Californiaon the states
Academic Performance Index (API), a numeric
scale that denes a schools performance level
on the basis of statewide testing results. Even
the schools mascota troutwas uninspiring. Despite the fact that the nearby creek had
hosted an occasional trout decades ago, this
mascot evoked little school pride. By 2002,
however, Vantage Elementary boasted signicantly higher student performance, having
raised its API to 447. Teacher professionalism
had improved, and the trout mascot had been
replaced by a bold graphic that symbolized the
schools renewed hope and pride.
In each of the 15 schools we studied, the
principal played a major role in building shared
leadership and a professional culture. As one
principal commented,
Im trying to lead for whenever I
may not be here any longerby
building both the capacity of systems through school design choices
and peoples capacity for leadership.
Evolving Phases of School Improvement

Of course, the principals in the study schools
differed in their personalities and in their
management strengths and weaknesses. But all
the principals shared certain characteristics that
contributed to their schools evolving culture of
leadership, including
Understanding of self and clarity of values;
A strong belief in equity and the democratic process;
Strategic thought about the evolution of
school improvement;
A vulnerable persona;
Knowledge of the work of teaching and
learning; and
The ability to develop capacity in colleagues and in the organization.
These characteristics played out differently
during three major phases of development that
150
we dened as instructive, transitional, and

high capacity. The three phases did not end
and begin with clean borders; on the contrary, many behaviors emerged, dissolved, and
reappeared as the struggle to build leadership
capacity progressed.
The Instructive Phase
School improvement begins with a period

of organization as the school initiates new
collaborative processes that relate to norms,
teams, vision, use of data, shared expectations,
and ways of working together. In the instructive phase, the principals roles are to insist
on attention to results, start conversations,
solve difcult problems, challenge assumptions, confront incompetence, focus work,
establish structures and processes that engage
colleagues, teach about new practices, and
articulate beliefs that eventually get woven into
the fabric of the school.
The principal of Kinder Elementary School
jump-started change by gathering teachers
together on a borrowed houseboat to develop
a school vision to which they could all commit. At Johnson Junior High School, the principal helped establish a steering committee and
cadres to involve everyone in the process of
leadership.
Principals in the study reported that they
encountered some patterns of teacher resistance, disengagement, and dependence during
this stage. More than one principal struggled
with a staff message of You just tell us your
vision for the school, and well act on it.
Most of the principals displayed strength
as a purposeful strategy during this phase.
Although they believed that they needed to
demonstrate assertive leadership to jump-start
the process of moving out of low-performance
status, they also understood that this assertive
leadership was a temporary stage in building
schoolwide leadership capacity.
The Transitional Phase
During the transitional phase, the principals

role is to gradually let go, releasing some
authority and control while providing continued
Ac ti v i ti e s
Principals Role in High Leadership

Capacity Schools
Uses his or her formal authority to

Implement community decisions.
Mediate political pressures.
Work with less-than-competent staff.
Work with legal and reform challenges.
coaching, and problem-solving within an
atmosphere of trust and safety. To navigate this
phase successfully, the principal must engage
151
Independent Study
Participates with other members of the

community to
Share concerns and issues.
Share decisions.
Monitor and implement shared vision.
Engage in reective practices (reection/inquiry/dialogue/action).
Monitor norms and take self-corrective
action.
Think strategically.
Build a culture of interdependency.
Self-organize.
Diversify and blend roles.
Establish criteria for self-accountability.
Share authority and responsibility
(dependent on expertise and interest
rather than on role).
Plan for enculturation of new staff and
successor.
Small Study Group
Displays the following personal attributes

and behaviors:
Learns continually.
Thinks strategically.
Is value- and vision-driven.
Continues and expands behaviors initiated in earlier phases.
in a strategic thought process, understanding

where the school culture is going and when to
pull back as teachers emerge as leaders.
In the study schools, teachers emerged as
leaders at varying rates. Many were more than
ready to think differently about their work and
expand their identities to incorporate teacher
leadership; others moved more cautiously and
deliberately. Because of the wide range of
teachers development as leaders, principals
often found the transitional phase to be the
most challenging. Some teachers still clung
to their dependent behaviors, expecting the
principal to continue to play an instructive
role; other teachers were awakening as more
independent professionals; and still others had
advanced to the high leadership capacity stage
and displayed self-organizing behaviors.
The transitional phase was a time of epiphanies for both principals and teachers in our
study. The principal of Caravell High School
noted that her strategy of strength may have
been getting in the way of others growth.
As a result of this insight, she pulled back,
encouraging more collaboration and peer
conversations to diminish the staffs reliance
on formal authority. When the California State
Department of Education identied Caravell as
a low-performing school, a dramatic turning
point occurred. The principal laid out the harsh
reality of the schools low-performing status
at a faculty meeting and declared, I dont
know what to do. Well have to gure this out
together.
They did. Teachers and parents joined action
teams to examine student performance data
and student work, conducted action research to
discover new data, developed a cadre of peer
coaches, and expanded their staff development
program. Teachers abandoned their isolated
practice by turning to one another.
The willingness of the principal to be
vulnerable was a crucial motivator during the
transitional phase. When teachers became
aware that the principal didnt claim to have
all the answers, they actively increased their
participation.
Large Group
support and coaching as teachers take on more

responsibility. Teachers often feel tempted to
abandon the effort at this pointit seems too
hard. The principal provides support by continuing the conversations, keeping a hand in the
process (rather than accepting quick xes),
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Study principals provided encouragement to

teachers during this phase through both direct
and subtle approaches. The principal of Garson
Elementary School framed the need to address
the achievement gap more aggressively:
Just remember that a change in
practice or instruction will always
come from the outside if you dont
create it from your own action
research.
The principals declaration of the consequences of inaction claried the reality of the
situation for teachers and encouraged them to
act. Together, principal and teachers formed
Peer Enquiry Program (PEP) teams. These
teams used constructivist conversations to pose
questions about groups of students who lagged
behind, to locate and organize data, and to
design new practices. Their conversations took
place in faculty meetings as well as in separately organized team meetings.
One of the most challenging aspects of the
transitional phase is the need to break through
dependencies. In a dependent culture, teachers believe that they need to ask the principals
permission for most actionsand they come
to expect the principal to make the decisions
and take care of them. During the transitional
phase, principals need to hand decisions and
problem solving back to the teachers, coaching
and leading for teacher efcacy while refusing
to hold tight to authority and power.
The principal of Toledo Elementary School
asked teachers to decide what to do when the
vice principal position was eliminated. They
resolved the issue by voluntarily dividing the
vice principals tasks among themselves. After
Riverside Elementary staff had evolved to a
high level of self-responsibility, they suggested
to the district that they could do ne without a principaland they did. And at Verde
Elementary, the principal willingly relinquished
responsibility for convening meetings and coordinating tasks when the teachers came to her
and said, We think it is time for you to let go.
152
The High Leadership Capacity Phase
During the high leadership capacity phase,

the school encourages the teachers to play
more prominent leadership roles. The principal
takes a lower prole and focuses on facilitation and coparticipation rather than dominance.
Teachers begin to initiate actions, take responsibility, discover time for joint efforts, and identify crucial questions about student learning.
Strikingly, principals and teachers often
become more alike than different during this
phase. A leveling of relationships occurs as
reciprocity develops between the principal and
the teachers. Teachers nd their voices, grow
condent in their beliefs, and become more
open to feedback. The principal no longer
needs to convene or mediate the conversations,
frame the problems, or challenge assumptions
alone. Principal and teachers begin to share the
same concerns and work together toward their
goals.
For example, teachers and administrators at
Poe High School developed leadership rubrics
to guide their work. And Riverside Elementary
teachers developed a set of agreements that
guided their shared leadership work: (1) No
one is above the other; (2) We are teachers
rst; (3) We are a community; and (4) We must
learn together.
Teachers Take On Leadership

An intriguing criterion for deciding whether
a school has reached the high leadership
capacity phase may be its ability to exist and
thrive without a principal, whether or not it
chooses to do so. Of the 15 study schools, 2
had progressed to the point where they operated with a part-time principal, and 1 operated
without any principal.
Is it desirable to operate without a person
in a full-time, formal role as principal? It
depends. There are many reasons for having a principal. One person can more easily
take responsibility for convening and facilitating conversations, securing focus, monitoring
progress, working through personnel-related
or legal difculties, working with the district,
Ac ti v i ti e s
When principals lead for whenever they

will not be there, as most of the principals in
our study did, teachers share responsibility for
the effectiveness of the school. Broad-based,
skillful participation in the work of leadership
contributes to lasting school improvement that
is all too rare.
Large Group
Endnotes
1
For a more detailed discussion of the study, see Lasting

Leadership: A Study of High Leadership Capacity Schools
(Lambert Leadership Development, 2004).
2
The names of all schools and educators in the study are
pseudonyms. San Jose Middle School and Joel Montero are
actual names.
Linda Lambert is Professor Emeritus at California State University at Hayward; [email protected]. She is the author
of Leadership Capacity for Lasting School Improvement
(ASCD, 2003).
Small Study Group
and handling political pressures. In spite of

the problems that may arise from giving so
much responsibility to one person, principals
continue to be the key to school improvement.
Unless a school has already developed high
leadership capacity, teacher behavior is often a
function of principal behavior.
Schools that have developed high leadership
capacity take on a different character, however.
Even if the principal is reassigned while the
school is still in the transitional phasewhich
often happensstaff commitment can survive
the change and even energize the new principal. Teachers nd leadership in one another,
assigning both credibility and authority to
their peers. They tap into mutual authority by
expecting others to identify problems and bring
them to the group.
Independent Study
153
Guiding Questions for Leadership for Lasting Reform

1. What does author Linda Lambert suggest are the most signicant processes
and practices associated with leadership that promote lasting reform?
Small Study Group
Large Group
2. What does Lambert suggest are the universal elements associated with sustaining school excellence? To what extent are these elements present in your
current school or district?
Independent Study
3. Lambert and her colleagues designed and developed a research study of

how 15 schools made the journey toward high leadership capacity, which
they dened as broad-based, skillful participation in the work of leadership.
How would you summarize the major conclusions from this study?
4. Lambert describes three phases that principals and teachers travel through
as their schools build high leadership capacity that sustains improvement.
What are these phases? How do these phases differ? How are they mutually
supportiveand somewhat inevitable, according to the author?
154
Activities
5. The author describes a series of behaviors and practices exhibited by principals in high leadership capacity schools. What are the implications for your
school or district of the behaviors Lambert identies for each of the following
areas:
Small Study Group
Personal attributes and behaviors?

Participation with other members of the community?
Use of formal authority?
7. How do Lamberts conclusions align with the ideas and principles of Understanding by Design, particularly the backward design process?
155
Independent Study
6. Like all the authors represented in this activity, Lambert reinforces the need
for teachers to take on leadership roles. What does the author suggest about
this area of high leadership capacity schools?
Large Group
Guiding Questions for Leadership for Lasting Reform (continued)
Activity 3.3
Schools That Promote Understanding

Participants can use the Self-Reection Checklist to discuss Organizational Review Questions and their implications for the school improvement process in their learning organization.
Small study groups can use the elements of the Self-Reection Checklist to investigate and research the Questions for Further Investigation
related to ensuring that schools promote understanding.
Individuals can use the Self-Reection Checklist to reect on a school
they are familiar with and answer the Organizational Review Checklist
Questions to determine the extent to which their learning organization
promotes understanding.
156
Activities
Somewhat
Evident
Not
Evident
Evident
Highly
Evident
Organizational Principle
Large Group
Self-Reection Checklist
1. Our vision and mission emphasize our commitment to helping all

students achieve deep understanding of our curriculum.
Small Study Group
2. Our learning organization consistently reects the best in what we

now know about the learning process.
3. We offer a curriculum that is clearly articulated with standards that
promote understanding for all students.
4. We have designed our curriculum to ensure that it identies the
big ideas, conceptual understandings, and essential questions
critical for student understanding.
5. Our curriculum emphasizes what all students should know, be
able to do, and understand.
Independent Study
6. We structure our written curriculum to ensure that teachers and

students have the time and resources to explore it in depth, rather
than for supercial coverage.
7. Our curriculum management process reinforces alignment
between and among our written, tested, taught, supported, and
learned curricula.
8. Our assessment and evaluation process emphasizes multiple
forms of assessment to capture the full range of student
understanding and performance.
9. All instructors effectively use multiple forms of assessment as a
tool for monitoring student understanding and achievement.
10. Assessment emphasizes the need to identify and address the
strengths and needs of all students relative to their understanding
of our curriculum and its standards.
11. Teachers differentiate instruction to accommodate the strengths
and needs of students, as identied by our assessment and
evaluation processes.
12. Instruction ensures that all students understand where they are
headed, why they are heading there, and ways in which they will
be evaluated.
157
Somewhat
Evident
Not
Evident
Organizational Principle
Evident
Self-Reection Checklist (continued)
Highly
Evident
Large Group
Independent Study
Small Study Group
13. At key points in every instructional episode, students interest and

engagement is hooked through experiential activities and inquirybased learning opportunities.
14. All students are equipped for success through learning
experiences that help them explore big ideas and essential
questions.
15. Instructors design learning activities to equip all students for
success on nal culminating projects and related performance
tasks.
16. All students are self-aware and self-evaluative as a result of
organizational commitment to the values of reecting, revising,
rethinking, and rening.
17. All students exhibit their evolving understanding and mastery of
standards through nal performances and products.
18. Instruction equips all students to move from concrete experience
toward abstract conceptualization and understanding.
19. All instructional and professional development activities reect the
backward design process: Stage 1Determining Desired Results;
Stage 2Monitoring and Assessing Achievement of Desired
Results; and Stage 3Designing Learning Activities to Promote
Desired Results.
20. Our learning organization reinforces six major behavior patterns
and habits of mind: explanation, application, interpretation,
perspective, empathy, and self-knowledge.
158
Activities
Large Group
Organizational Review Questions

Use the Self-Reection Checklist to discuss the following questions.
1. How successfully does your schoolor the schools in your district
reect the elements of the vision presented here for aligning
learning organizations with Understanding by Design principles?
2. Which components have you already implemented successfully?
3. Which components need further attention and emphasis? Why?
159
Questions for Further Investigation
Small Study Group
1. What are the implications for your school or district of each of the
principles and ideas presented in this checklist for aligning learning
organizations with Understanding by Design principles?
2. How knowledgeable are you about the rationale for each item?
How could you enhance your understanding of items you are not
familiar with?
3. What are the implications of this activity for your own school
improvement planning process?
160
Activities
Large Group
Organizational Review Checklist Questions

1. To what extent does that school site embody the principles
and ideas expressed in this vision for schools that promote
understanding?
Independent Study
2. How might the members of that learning community move toward

adopting and achieving the goals implicit in each part of the
checklist?
161
Activity 3.4
Professional Development That Promotes Understanding

An essential part of successful Understanding by Design implementation involves sustained professional development. Large group professional development emphasizing this part of the program can use the
Evaluating Professional Development Questionnaire as a catalyst for
a discussing the implications of Understanding by Design on multiple
levels. The Large Group Guiding Questions will help focus discussion.
A powerful small study group focus can be staff members investigation and discussion of current research-based best practices involving professional development. For example, the group can use the
strategies and suggestions in the Evaluating Professional Development
Questionnaire to discuss and debate the quality of their current professional development activities. They can also discuss the implications
of this questionnaire for improving current training practices. Finally,
small study groups can use this questionnaire to explore its implications for professional development planning in their respective schools
or districts.
This Evaluating Professional Development Questionnaire can be used
as a catalyst for self-reection and self-evaluation by individuals interested in or involved with school-based and district professional development. The Reection Questions will help focus reection.
162
Activities
Somewhat
Evident
Not
Evident
Evident
Highly
Evident
Professional Development Descriptor
Large Group
Evaluating Professional Development Questionnaire
1. Our professional development is ongoing and job-embedded,

addressing the specic needs of all participants.
Small Study Group
2. Our staff development emphasizes participant understanding,

rather than just knowingdoing.
3. Through initial training and appropriate follow-up, participants
grow in their ability to use training knowledge and skills and exhibit
one or more of the facets of understanding in their professional
practice.
4. Professional development programs and practices emphasize the
need for a collaborative community of learning.
5. When new training content is introduced, variations of small study
groups represent the preferred mode of delivery.
Independent Study
6. Participants receive ongoing opportunities to engage in inquiry and

exploration of training content and strategies.
7. Professional development generally culminates in some form of
action research, exploring how the use of key training elements
affects student achievement.
8. We are able to determine the value added of our training
and professional development, especially its effect on student
achievement, staff performance, and organizational productivity.
9. Professional development is designed to help participants move
along predictable stages of concern, from initial knowledge to
ultimate internalization and independent application of training
elements.
10. Through collaboration and ongoing program evaluation, we modify
our professional development activities and practices to ensure
maximum impact and participant understanding.
163
Large Group
Large Group Guiding Questions

Use the Evaluating Professional Development Questionnaire to address the following questions.
1. To what extent does your professional development use the principles of Understanding by Design to address the needs of the adult
learner?
2. If your school or district is currently providing Understanding by

Design training, how closely does the professional development
related to Understanding by Design embody the ideas and strategies presented here?
3. If your school or district is planning to implement Understanding by

Design, how can you ensure that you successfully address each of
the design principles presented here?
164
Activities
Reection Questions
1. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the principles and
strategies presented here?
Independent Study
2. How can you help your school or district to adopt these

principlesor use them to enhance the success of your
professional development activities and programs?
165
Activity 3.5
Implementation Challenges

As participants use this part of the program to explore the implications
of Understanding by Design for school improvement planning, they
may benet from discussing the Comparison Matrix. It identies generic
school and district goals and unpacks the implications for using
Understanding by Design to address those goals. Participants should
consider the Comparison Matrix Reection Questions.
Small study groups can use the Comparison Matrix to investigate
research-based best practices associated with the school improvement
planning process. They can begin by discussing the implications of this
Comparison Matrix for their individual school or district. Next, they can
study how currently underutilized areas might be addressed more successfully within their respective schools or districts.
This Comparison Matrix can be used by individuals in an independent
study mode to reect on the Independent Reection Questions.
166
Activities
Large Group
Comparison Matrix
School or District Goal
Understanding by Design
Implications
2. Reinforce students understanding of the

big ideas and interconnections within the
curriculum they study.
2. Integrate enduring understandings and

essential questions as cueing devices
within all curriculum content areas.
3. Make certain that all students achieve high

levels of understanding, not just formulaic
knowledge and recall.
3. Emphasize the six facets of understanding:

application, interpretation, explanation,
perspective, empathy, and self-knowledge.
4. Ensure that assessment provides a

complete and balanced portrait of what all
students know, can do, and understand.
4. Adopt the Understanding by Design

photo album metaphor.
5. Help students to move along a continuum

from concrete to abstract, from teacherguided to independent learning.
5. Organize units so that students learning

spirals toward independent application.
6. Reinforce all students sense of efcacy,

purpose, and authenticity.
6. Integrate the W element of

W.H.E.R.E.T.O. in daily lesson
design and delivery.
7. Engage student interest and ownership.
7. Hook students in key sections of all

lessons.
8. Equip all students for success through

experiential learning opportunities.
8. Reinforce the rst E of W.H.E.R.E.T.O.

to equip students with the knowledge and
skills to explore the topic.
9. Reinforce students ability to monitor their

own comprehension (i.e., metacognition
and self-regulation).
9. Stress the four Rs: reect, revise, rethink,

rene.
10. Encourage students to self-evaluate and

self-express.
10. Use strategies such as think-pair-share,

journaling, interviews, and presentations.
11. Differentiate instruction to accommodate

the needs and strengths of all learners.
11. Tailor learning activities to address all

students strengths and needs.
12. Organize instruction to maximize

learning for all students, including special
populations.
12. Organize learning around big ideas

and essential questions, revisiting core
knowledge and skills with increasing
complexity.
167
Independent Study
1. Provide Understanding by Design training

to help educators unpack district
standards and their implications for
required testing.
Small Study Group
1. Ensure that all staff members understand

district standards and their implications for
high-stakes accountability testing.
Large Group
Comparison Matrix Reection Questions

Use the Comparison Matrix to focus a discussion on the following questions.
1. To what extent does the list of school and district goals reect priorities in your school or district?
2. How might you address the Understanding by Design implications

as part of your school improvement planning efforts?
168
Activities
Independent Reection Questions

1. To what extent is your school or district currently addressing each
of the identied school or district goals?
Small Study Group

Independent Study
2. How useful are the suggestions presented in the Understanding by

Design Implications for your particular school or district?
169
U N D E RSTA N D I N G BY D E S I G N :
THE EXPERTS AND
PRACTITIONERS SPEAK
Understanding by Design: The Experts and

Practitioners Speak
This strand provides participants with an opportunity to reect on how
the Understanding by Design experts Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe
and practitioners respond to key questions related to Understanding by
Design implementation.
These video excerpts, professional development activities, and suggested readings provide an ideal set of resources for small study groups
and inquiry teams interested in investigating and debating the principles and evolving uses of Understanding by Design and its implications
for their work with professional development.
171
Activity 4.1
Large Group Questions and Strategies
Directions
Within your large group, complete the Previewing and Postviewing handout, then determine which of the topics listed under Getting Started with Understanding by Design reect participants needs.
Consider breaking the large group into smaller groups based on participants topic choices.
172
Activities
1. Before viewing this strand of the program, what do you predict the
experts and practitioners will say regarding the following questions?
Where do we start?
How long does it take to become procient with the backward design
process?
How does Understanding by Design work at a school or district level?
2. After viewing this video for this strand, what can you take away
with you that will support your journey to promote learning for
understanding? How might you use the recommendations and suggestions to guide and inform your journey?
173
Large Group
Getting Started with Understanding by Design

1. According to Jay McTighe, there are multiple pathways for getting
started with Understanding by Design. Discuss which of his suggestions you have already used and which you might consider implementing:
Read the Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd Edition.
Design small study group activities involving the text.
Attend an introductory workshop.
Design a unit using the backward design process, working with a topic
participants are very comfortable with.
Get feedback from colleagues about the unit and its draft design.
Try out the unit to determine what students understand from it and
modify it to work out the rough spots.
Provide participants with resources to enhance their implementation of
Understanding by Design.
A. Introductory professional development should emphasize key

elements and principles, building consensus about the importance
of teaching for understanding and using the design principles of the
Understanding by Design framework.
B. Professional development related to Understanding by Design
requires work over time.
C. Effective professional development should be collaborative, including
small study groups and action research.
D. Teachers need support and coaching to ensure that they eld-test
their units and revise those units using peer feedback.
174
Disagree
Statement
Somewhat
Agree
2. In this strand, the experts and practitioners emphasize the critical

role of professional development in successful Understanding by
Design implementation. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the following statements?
Agree
Large Group
Activities
Large Group
Disagree
A. Teachers need to know their content thoroughly with understanding.

B. Old planning habits need to be broken, particularly with coverageoriented and activity-based design and replaced by the three stages
of backward design.
Small Study Group
Somewhat
Agree
Challenge
Agree
3. Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe suggest that Understanding by

Design is a challenging planning framework. For this topic, share
your reactions to the following challenges, as identied by Wiggins
and McTighe.
C. Textbooks need to be used as resources, not as curriculum.
Independent Study
175
Activity 4.2
Small Study Group Questions and Strategies
Directions
Within a small study group, participants determine which of the following options best reect their indicated areas of interest. Breaking
the small study group into smaller pair groups based on participants
option choices may prove helpful.
176
Activities
Small Study Group Options
2. Small study groups can organize their initial investigation of Understanding by Design by discussing the following key concepts:
Plan backward, clarifying desired results for organizational improvement
and change.
Build consensus about what staff want to accomplish by introducing
Incorporate Understanding by Design into district curriculum planning.
Use the three stages of backward design in all aspects of action planning.
177
Small Study Group
1. As a small study group, participants discuss which of the following

processes appear to have the greatest potential for successful implementation of Understanding by Design in their school or district:
Read Understanding by Design (text and workbook).
Attend an introductory workshop.
Design a unit using the backward design process, working with a topic
participants are very comfortable with.
Get feedback from colleagues about the unit and its draft design.
Try out the unit to determine what students understand from it and
modify it to work out the rough spots.
Provide participants with resources to enhance their implementation of
Small Study Group Options (continued)
A. Teachers need to know their content thoroughly with understanding.

B. Old planning habits need to be broken, particularly with coverageoriented and activity-based design and replaced by the three stages
of backward design.
C. Textbooks need to be used as resources, not as curriculum.
4. In this strand, Wiggins and McTighe and practitioners emphasize

the critical role of professional development in successful Understanding by Design implementation. Small study groups may wish
to explore this important issue, beginning with a discussion of the
National Staff Development Councils Standards and recommendations for successful professional development.
178
Disagree
Agree
Small Study Group
Challenge
Somewhat
Agree
3. Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe suggest that Understanding by

Design is a challenging planning framework. For this topic, share
your reactions to the following challenges, as identied by Wiggins
and McTighe.
Activity 4.3
Independent Study Questions and Strategies
Directions
Individuals engaging in independent study should use the Guiding
Questions in this activity to navigate through the activity.
179
Guiding Questions
1. Before viewing the video for this strand, what do you predict the
experts and practitioners will say regarding the following questions?
Where do we start?
How long does it take to become procient with the backward design
process?
How does Understanding by Design work at a school or district level?
Independent Study
2. After viewing the video for this strand, how do you believe Understanding by Design promotes the learning of all students? How
might you use the recommendations and suggestions to guide and
inform your journey?
3. According to the experts and practitioners, schools and districts getting started with Understanding by Design need to address several
challenges. What are some of the issues identied? How would you
recommend your school or district address them?
180
Activity 4.4
Assessing Teaching and Professional Development
Large Group, Small Study Group, and Individual Study Directions

Professional development cohorts, small study groups, and individuals engaged in independent study of this fourth strand may wish to
read Wiggins and McTighes article Examining the Teaching Life. In
this article, the authors contend that educators need to assess teaching
practices and professional development activities in light of sound principles about how learning works. Use the suggested guiding questions
for reading and discussing the implications of this article.
181
Independent Study
Small Study Group
Large Group
Examining the Teaching Life

Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe
We need to assess teaching practices and

professional development activities in light of
sound principles about how learning works.
A school is in business to cause and promote
learning. It should therefore model for all institutions what it means to be a learning organization. A school is not merely a place that
expects students to learn; it must encourage
and support everyones learning.
For a school to be a model learning organization, all faculty members should be professional learners: They should engage in deep,
broad study of the learning they are charged
to cause. What works? What doesnt? Where
is student learning most successful, and why?
How can we learn from that success? Where
are students struggling to learn, and why? What
can we do about it? Effectively tackling these
questions is what the professional in professional practice means.
How Learning Works

We are advocating for something more than
the professional learning communities that
DuFour and others have so eloquently
described. School leaders need to create job
requirements that make learning about learning
mandatory. Moreover, we need the equivalent
in schools of a Learning Bill of Rightsstandards and structures that help us research and
decide, as a staff, whether a given teaching
practice is truly professional and consistent
with our mission and state standards. These
learning principles, like the Bill of Rights,
should serve as criteria for safeguarding a
learning-centered mission in which teachers
regularly engage in peer review and selfassessment as part of their jobs.
Resources for Developing a Set of

Learning Principles
Classroom Instruction That Works:
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing
Student Achievement. Robert J. Marzano,
Debra Pickering, and Jane E. Pollock.
(2001). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. John D. Bransford,
Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking.
(Eds.). (2000). Washington, DC: National
Academy Press.
Inventing Better Schools: An Action
Plan for Educational Reform. Phillip C.
Schlechty. (1997). San Francisco: JosseyBass.
Learner-Centered Psychological Principles: A Framework for School Redesign
and Reform. American Psychological
Association. (1997). Available: www.apa.
org/ed/lcp.html
Making America Smarter. Lauren B.
Resnick. (1999). Education Week (Century Series), 18(40), 3840.
Powerful Learning. Ron Brandt.
(1998). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
In a true learning organization, staff members should work together to arrive at their
own common principles. In departmental,
team, or school meetings, faculty could rst
review the list of principles that follows or consult various authoritative resources to develop
one of their own (see Resources for Developing a Set of Learning Principles). A committee composed of supervisors and teacher
leaders could then hone the list into a draft for
Source: From Examining the Teaching Life, by G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, 2006, Educational Leadership, 63(6), 2629.
182
Ac ti v i ti e s
U n d e r s t a n d i n g by De s i g n: T h e E x p e r t s a n d Pr a c ti ti o n e r s S p e a k
The Unexamined Teaching Life

Four characteristics distinguish professionals
in any eld. Professionals (1) act on the most
current knowledge that denes their eld; (2)
are client-centered and adapt to meet the needs
of the individuals whom they serve; (3) are
results-oriented; and (4) uphold the standards
of the profession in their own practice and
through peer review.
A great weakness of our craft is that we typically do not require faculty members to justify
their teaching methods, course designs, and
assessments against a set of learning principles.
Indeed, in some academic settings, even raising
183
Independent Study
Like the Bill of Rights, these principles,

although clear, are necessarily pregnant with
possibilities and implications that we can tease
out only through continual analysis of the
cases that come before us. Staff, team, departmental, and grade-level meetings should focus
in large part on considering such professional
matters as pedagogical questions, selection of
instructional materials, and persistent achievement problems through the lens of learning
principles.
The cases considered would be impersonal,
a summary of individual classroom issues that
raise an important question for staff to consider. For example, a team leader might invite
members to bring samples of their strongest
and weakest tests for a general discussion of
the validity of local assessments related to standards. Or a department head might ensure that
one meeting each semester is devoted to analyzing student feedback from a staff-developed
survey about student engagement in various
assignments and practices.
Small Study Group
habits, as well as a curriculum designed to

foster rethinking.
9. Instruction is most effective when it is
personalizedwhen we sufciently honor
learners interests, curiosity, strengths, contributions, and prior knowledge, making learners
feel that they are an important part of something larger than themselves.
Large Group
approval by the entire staff. Because teachers

will hold themselves accountable for the learning principles, they must own them at a deep
level for signicant reform to occur and for
schools to truly become learning organizations.
To help you get started, we offer the following nine principles that we have developed to
reect an understanding about how learning
works:
1. A key goal of learning is uent and exible transfersuccessfully using ones knowledge and skill on worthy tasks in important,
realistic situations.
2. Engaged and sustained learning, a prerequisite for understanding, requires that learners
see the value of their work and experience a
growing sense of efcacy when facing worthy
challenges.
3. Success at transfer depends on understanding the big ideas that connect otherwise
isolated or inert facts, skills, and experiences,
enabling learners to meet and understand new
challenges.
4. An understanding is a realization that
the learner experiences about the power of
an idea. We cannot give understandings; we
need to engineer them so that learners see for
themselves how an idea can empower them to
make sense of things.
5. Learners require clear priorities and a practical knowledge of the work products involved
to meet goals and understand standards of
excellence.
6. Learners require regular, timely, and userfriendly feedback to understand goals, produce
quality work, and meet high standards.
7. Learners attain understanding only
through regular reection, self-assessment, and
self-adjustment as they apply prior learning to
new situations and tasks through assessments
that demand reection and transfer.
8. The capacity to deeply understand
depends on the capacity to reexamine our
thinking because any insight typically requires
us to rene our earlier ideas. Being willing and
able to rethink requires a safe and supportive
environment for questioning assumptions and
Small Study Group
Large Group
this point is viewed as an assault on academic

freedom. As a result, many well-intentioned
teachers end up in the grip of unexamined
habits of teaching.
The inherent and perpetual isolation of staff
in schools only makes matters worse. Without
regular opportunities to consider, observe, and
analyze best practice and receive helpful, nonevaluative feedback, how likely are teachers to
engage in continual professional improvement?
Indeed, teachers can be remarkably thinskinned when someone questions their methods or decisions, and many of us resist seeking
or receiving feedback from students, parents,
colleagues, and supervisors. When students fail
to learn, some teachers end up blaming the students, without an honest investigation of where
student fault ends and teacher responsibility
begins.
Independent Study
Nothing Personal, But . . .

The nine learning principles can serve as a
vital touchstone and as a counterweight to bad
habits that impede a schools mission. They can
help dene best practice and depersonalize the
feedback necessary to improve teaching. In a
pedagogical disagreement, teachers and supervisors too often revert to defensive postures.
He just doesnt like my teaching style and
Ive been teaching for a long time, and I know
that. . . . are frequent laments in supervisory
or collegial talk. These discussions can never
come to a meaningful professional conclusion
unless we refer to valid standards for learning.
Depersonalized feedback is productive
because it is disinterested: Nothing personal, but lecturing 80 percent of the time is
inconsistent with the school goal of engaging
learners in making meaning for themselves.
Or, Nothing personal, but widespread use
of multiple-choice departmental exams is out
of sync with our mission to teach and assess
for understanding and transfer. Or, Nothing
personal, but only one-quarter of your students, when surveyed, report that they nd
their classwork meaningful. Without explicit
184
learning principlesand clear course goals

linked to standardsthere will be no end to
tiresome debates and disingenuous posturing
about practice. In other words, no matter how
common specic teaching practices have been
historically, they are only professional when
they are defensible in terms of the schools mission and its adopted learning principles.
The need to vigorously and continually
question what happens in the name of learning
would be obvious to all educators if we werent
so comfortable with our habits, and hence so
blind to their shortcomings. Some teachers
think nothing of failing a student for a given
project or even an entire semester because of
one zero averaged in to the students grade,
even though such a practice has no counterpart in the wider world and strikes the very
notion of fairness (not to mention the notions
of validity and reliability). Some administrators
dont bat an eye when faculty members fail to
consider students learning styles in scheduling
classes or designing lessons. We defend many
comfortable school customs by saying, Hey, it
worked for me and my kids! or Weve always
done it this way!
In a model learning organization, such
responses are the opposite of what we would
expect and demand. Rather, we educators
would continually ask the following questions:
For whom is school currently not working as a
place for learning? Why? How can we improve
learning for all?
Examining Staff Learning

If our learning principles are valid, they should
apply not only to student learning but also to
professional development of staff members.
Consider just two of these principles:
Instruction is most effective when it is
personalizedwhen we sufciently honor
learners interests, curiosity, strengths, contributions, and prior knowledge, making
learners feel they are an important part of
something larger than themselves.
Ac ti v i ti e s
U n d e r s t a n d i n g by De s i g n: T h e E x p e r t s a n d Pr a c ti ti o n e r s S p e a k
If our message is to continually learn about

learning, it would hardly do for us to recommend that you unthinkingly adopt our learning
principles. So, do not accept our principles as
gospel; do not demand that staff or colleagues
bow down before them.
Rather, think of these principles as a rough
draft for developing a set of understandings
about learning that faculty willingly sign off on
as representing their views about how people
best learn. Consider the principles as a jump
start for the challenging yet invigorating task at
the heart of learning about learning.
Grant Wiggins is President of Authentic Education, P.O. Box
148, Hopewell, NJ 08525; [email protected]. Jay
McTighe is Educational Consultant with Jay McTighe and
Associates, 6581 River Run, Columbia, MD 21044; jmctigh
@aol.com. They are coauthors of Understanding by Design
(Expanded 2nd ed.) (ASCD, 2005).
185
Independent Study
Owning the Principles
Small Study Group
Many inservice programs for teachers neither

personalize learning nor focus on the teachers need to eventually transfer the learning
to their classrooms. Much of what passes for
inservice professional development is neither
professional nor adequate for developing new
learning by staff. In the worst cases, it is merely
a day-lling smorgasbord, a tasting of interesting tidbits that teachers are free to try out or
ignore.
Time again for our mantra: Nothing personal, but many inservice experiences seem
to be contrary to the learning principles. Staff
members criticisms have reected this for
years. How can we make changes, on the basis
of our learning principles and staff feedback?
Indeed, if we were to agree to evaluate all
professional development against the learning principles, we could quickly eradicate the
most pointless aspects of so-called professional
development activitiessuch as a mandatory
one-size-ts-all sit n git inservice day whose
agenda teachers have little say inwith less
hurt to and resistance from program planners
than leaders might fear.
Unsound and unprofessional practices are
also abetted by the failure of school leaders to
provide staff with ongoing, organized opportunities to learn about learning and the effects
of their teaching as part of the job. Practically
speaking, that means providing the time and
support necessary to ensure ongoing, collaborative staff research and development. True professional practice requires a continual, in-depth
investigation into what is and isnt working
locally, with ongoing adjustments to instruction on the basis of analysis and best practice.
For example, each department or grade-level
team would be expected to routinely analyze

the assessments it uses each semester to ensure
that they assess according to state standards.
Faculty members would analyze assessment
results and devise an action plan that targets
key weaknesses in student performance.
Leadership in a learning organization means
leading by being a model learner and by
demanding learning. The leadership team in
a school or district must be seen as a group
of professional learners, whether the purview
is budgets, buses, or books. Not just because
continual learning is desirable, but because it is
essential: Each new school year brings extraordinary change to the institution as another large
group of new students (and perhaps teachers)
arrives. The job of education leaders in the
21st century is to continually demand signicant new learning, clarifying which timeworn
aspects of schooling advance learning and
which unwittingly impede it.
Large Group
A key goal of learning is uent and

exible transfersuccessfully using
ones knowledge and skill on worthy tasks in
important, realistic situations.
Guiding Questions for Examining the Teaching Life

1. Do you agree or disagree with the authors suggestion that in
effective learning communities, School leaders need to create job
requirements that make learning about learning mandatory?
Small Study Group
Large Group
Independent Study
2. In the section How Learning Works, Wiggins and McTighe present nine principles to reect their understanding of how learning
works. In your opinion, which of their principles have the greatest
truth or signicance? Are there any you disagree with or question?
To what extent are these nine learning principles generally operational in your school or district?
3. According to the authors, four characteristics distinguish professionals in any eld. Do you perceive these characteristics to be
operational in the eld of education? To what extent do you agree
with the authors that organizational barriers and problems impede
educators demonstration of these characteristics?
186
Activities
Large Group
Guiding Questions for Examining the Teaching Life (continued)

4. In the section entitled Nothing Personal, But . . . , Wiggins and
McTighe assert that, In a pedagogical disagreement, teachers and
supervisors too often revert to defensive postures. How do you
react to the arguments and assertions presented in this section? Do
you agree or disagree with the authors?
Small Study Group

Independent Study
5. In the section Examining Staff Learning, the authors suggest that

their learning principles should apply to professional development
as well as student learning. They emphasize the need for instruction
of the adult learner to be personalized as well as promote uent
and exible transfer. To what extent are your professional development experiences consistent withor at odds withthe recommendations presented in this section of the article?
6. The article concludes with the authors recommendation that readers think of these principles as a rough draft for developing a set
of understandings about learning that faculty willingly sign off on as
representing their views about how people best learn. How might
your school or district go about accepting Wiggins and McTighes
challenge?
187
CLASSROOM EXAMPLES
Classroom Examples
The elementary, middle, and high school examples provide participants
with an opportunity to view key elements of units that were presented
over an extended period of time. The examples emphasize the continuum of experiences that are an importantand inevitablepart of
successful Understanding by Design implementation. Participating educators vary from those in their rst year of using the Understanding by
Design framework to those with multiple years of experience.
These video excerpts and professional development activities provide
an ideal set of resources for small study groups and inquiry teams interested in investigating and debating the principles and evolving uses of
Understanding by Design in the classroom.
189
Activity 5.1
Observing Backward Design in Classroom Examples
Large Group, Small Study Group, and Individual Study Directions

Professional development cohorts, small study groups, and individuals engaged in independent study may wish to view the elementary,
middle, and high school classroom examples included in the program.
Use the Backward Design Observation Checklist to evaluate the quality
and levels of use of the three stages of backward design. The checklist
and users additional comments can be used as catalysts for discussing
the implications of Understanding by Design on multiple levels.
190
O b s e r v i n g B a c k wa rd De s i g n i n C l a s s roo m E xa m p l e s
Large Group
Backward Design Observation Checklist

Use the observation checklist to evaluate the quality and levels of use of the
three stages of backward design in the elementary, middle, and high school
classrooms. You may wish to apply the following rating scale to each element:
=
=
=
=
=
Extensive evidence of effective use in all classroom examples.

General evidence of effective use in all classroom examples.
General evidence of effective use in some classroom examples.
Minimal evidence of effective use in classroom examples.
No evidence of effective use in any of the classroom examples.
Small Study Group
4
3
2
1
0
Stage 1: Desired Results

Elementary
School
Middle
School
High
School
Independent Study
1. The examples clearly reect

emphasis on key power
standards and established
goals.
2. All learners are clear about the
big ideas of the lessons or
units.
3. The instructors communicate
and organize learning activities
around conceptual cues,
including essential questions.
4. Lesson and unit objectives
clearly articulate what all learners
are expected to know and do,
with emphasis on one or more of
the six facets of understanding
(i.e., explanation, interpretation,
application, perspective,
empathy, self-knowledge).
Additional comments
191
Large Group
Stage 2: Assessment Evidence

Elementary
School
Middle
School
High
School
Independent Study
Small Study Group
1. The collection and analysis

of assessment evidence are
ongoing.
2. Students are actively engaged
in the assessment process and
show a clear understanding
of the desired results they are
responsible for.
3. Assessment appears to be
balanced, with the instructors
collecting a range of evidence to
monitor students achievement
of desired results.
4. Assessment activities appear
to help students move toward
growing levels of independent
use and transfer of key content.
5. The activities presented reinforce
students ability to engage in
culminating performance tasks
and projects.
6. Overall, the instructors appear to
use assessment for a variety of
purposes, including diagnostic
and formative as well as
summative assessments.
Additional comments
192
O b s e r v i n g B a c k wa rd De s i g n i n C l a s s roo m E xa m p l e s
Large Group
Stage 3: Learning Activities

Elementary
School
Middle
School
High
School
Small Study Group
1. The instructors appear to

use activities to monitor and
diagnose how individual
students are progressing.
2. At the beginning of instructional
episodes, the instructors hook
students interest.
3. Students are equipped for
success via experiential learning,
exploration, and inquiry.
4. Students revise and rethink their
learning.
Independent Study
5. At key points in the episodes,

students have opportunities to
self-evaluate their understanding.
6. Where appropriate, the
instructors appear to
tailor learning activities to
accommodate individual student
readiness levels, interests, and
learning styles.
7. Overall, the episodes reect
students growth toward
conceptual understanding and
transfer in authentic, real-world
settings.
Additional comments
193
RE
S OURC E S
Glossary of Understanding by Design Terms

Application
One of the six facets of understanding and a time-honored indicator of
understanding. The ability to apply knowledge and skill in diverse situations provides important evidence of the students understanding.
Assessment
Techniques used to analyze student accomplishments against specic
goals and criteria. A test is one type of assessment. Others include
observations, self-assessments, and surveys. Good assessment requires
a balance of techniques. In an assessment, the teacher makes thoughtful observations and disinterested judgments and offers clear and helpful feedback. Assessment is sometimes viewed as synonymous with
evaluation. A teacher can assess a students strengths and weaknesses
without placing a value or a grade on the performance.
Authentic Assessment or Authentic Task
An assessment composed of performance tasks and activities designed
to simulate or replicate important real-world challenges. The heart of
authentic assessment is realistic performance-based testingasking the
student to use knowledge in real-world ways, with genuine purposes,
audiences, and situational variables. Authentic assessments are meant to
do more than test: they should teach students what the doing of a
subject looks like and what kinds of performance challenges are actually considered most important in a eld or profession. The tasks are
chosen because they represent essential questions or challenges facing
practitioners in the eld.
Backward Design
An approach to designing a curriculum or unit that begins with the
end in mind and designs toward that end. Although such an approach
seems logical, it is viewed as backward because many teachers begin
their unit design with the meanstextbooks, favored lessons, and
time-honored activitiesrather than deriving those from the endthe
targeted results, such as content standards or understandings.
Stage 1 emphasizes desired results, including established goals (i.e.,
the most signicant content standards students are expected to
Source: Adapted from Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd Edition (pp. 336354), by
G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, 2005, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
195
understand at the conclusion of the unit), enduring understandings,

essential questions, and enabling knowledge objectives (i.e., what
students should know and be able to do at the conclusion of the
unit).
Stage 2 emphasizes the need to use a balanced, photo album
approach to monitoring student achievement and collecting evidence of student understanding, including constructed-response test
items, reective assessments, academic prompts, culminating performance tasks and projects, and engaging students in self-evaluation
via rubrics and other scoring tools.
Stage 3 involves the design of learning activities consistent with
W.H.E.R.E.T.O. design principles.
Big Idea
In Understanding by Design, the core concepts, principles, theories,
and processes should serve as the focal point of curricula, instruction,
and assessment. By denition, big ideas are important and enduring.
Big ideas are transferable beyond the scope of a particular unit, e.g.,
adaptations, allegory, signicant gures. Big ideas are the building
material of understanding. They can be thought of as the meaningful
patterns that enable one to connect the dots of otherwise fragmented
knowledge.
Such ideas go beyond discrete facts or skills to focus on larger concepts, principles, or processes. These are applicable to new situations
within or beyond the subject. For example, students study the enactment of the Magna Carta as a specic historical event because of its
signicance to a larger ideas, the rule of law, whereby written laws
specify the limits of a governments power and the rights of individuals,
such as due process. The big idea transcends its roots in 13th century
England and is a cornerstone of modern democratic societies.
Concept
A mental construct or category represented by a word or phrase.
Concepts include both tangible objects (e.g., chair, rabbit) and abstract
ideas (e.g., democracy, bravery). Overarching understandings are
derived from concepts.
196
Glossar y
Coverage
A teaching approach that supercially teaches and tests content knowledge irrespective of student understanding or engagement. The term
generally has a negative connotation. It implies that the goal is to
march through a body of material (often a textbook) within a specied
time frame.
Design Standards
The specic standards used to evaluate the quality of unit designs.
Rather than treating design as merely a function of good intentions
and hard work, standards and a peer review process provide a way
for teachers work to be assessed in the same way that student work is
assessed against rubrics and anchors. The design standards have a dual
purpose: (1) to guide improvements and (2) to provide a mechanism
for quality control, a means of validating curricular designs.
Desired Result
A specic educational goal or achievement target. In Understanding by
Design, Stage 1 sums up all desired results. Common synonyms include
target, goal, objective, and intended outcome. Desired results in education are generally of ve kinds: (1) factual or rule-based declarative
knowledge (e.g., a noun is the name of a person, place, or thing); (2)
skills and processes (e.g., rendering a perspective drawing, researching
a topic); (3) understandings and insights derived from inferences into
ideas, people, situations, and processes (e.g., visible light represents
a very small band within the electromagnetic spectrum); (4) habits of
mind (e.g., persistence, tolerance for ambiguity); and (5) attitudes (e.g.,
appreciation of reading as a valuable leisure-time pursuit).
Empathy
One of the six facets of understanding. Empathy, the ability to walk
in anothers shoes, to escape ones own emotional reactions to grasp
anothers, is central to the most common colloquial use of the term
understanding. When we try to understand another person, people, or
culture, we strive for empathy. It is thus not simply affective response;
it is not sympathy. It is a learned ability to grasp the world from someone elses point of view.
Enduring Understanding
The specic inferences, based on big ideas that have lasting value
beyond the classroom. In Understanding by Design, designers are
encouraged to write them as full-sentence statements, describing what,
specically, students should understand about the topic. The stem
197
Students will understand that . . . provides a practical tool for identifying understandings.
Enduring understandings are central to a discipline and are transferable to new situations. For example, in learning about the rule of law,
students come to understand that written laws specify the limits of a
governments power and articulate the rights of individuals, such as due
process. This inference from facts, based on big ideas such as rights
and due process, provides a conceptual unifying lens through which
to recognize the signicance of the Magna Carta as well as to examine
emerging democracies in the developing world.
Essential Question
A question that lies at the heart of a subject or a curriculum and promotes inquiry and uncoverage of a subject. Essential questions do not
yield a single straightforward answer but produce different plausible
responses about which thoughtful and knowledgeable people may
disagree.
Explanation
One of the six facets of understanding. Understanding involves more
than just knowing information. A person with understanding is able
to explain why it is so, not just state the facts. Such understanding
emerges as a well-developed and supported theory, an account that
makes sense of data, phenomena, ideas, or feelings. Understanding is
revealed through performances and products that clearly, thoroughly,
and instructively explain why things work, what they imply, where they
connect, and why they happened.
Facets of Understanding
A way in which a persons understanding manifests itself. Understanding by Design identies six kinds of understanding: application, empathy, explanation, interpretation, perspective, and self-knowledge. True
understanding is revealed by a persons ability to
Explain: Provide thorough, supported, and justiable accounts of
phenomena, facts, and data.
Interpret: Tell meaningful stories; offer apt translations; provide
a revealing historical or personal dimension to ideas and events;
make something personal or accessible through images, anecdotes, analogies, or models.
Apply: Effectively use and adapt knowledge in diverse contexts.
Have perspective: See points of view with critical eyes and ears;
see the big picture.
198
Glossar y
Empathize: Get inside, nd value in what others might nd odd,

alien, or implausible; perceive sensitively based on prior direct
experience.
Have self-knowledge: Perceive the personal style, prejudices, projections, and habits of mind that both shape and impede understanding; be aware of what is not understood and why it is so
hard to understand.
G.R.A.S.P.S.
A design tool to assist in the creation of performance tasks. Performance tasks typically present students with a problem: a real-world
goal set within a realistic context of challenges and possibilities. Each
letter of the G.R.A.S.P.S. acronym corresponds with a task element:
goal, role, audience, situation, performance, standards.
Interpretation
One of the six facets of understanding. To interpret is to nd meaning,
signicance, sense, or value in human experience, data, and texts. It
is to tell a good story, provide a powerful metaphor, or sharpen ideas
through an editorial.
Leading Question
A question used to teach, clarify, or assess for knowledge. Unlike
essential questions, leading questions have correct and straightforward
answers. Leading questions have a useful role in teaching and checking
for understanding, but their purpose is different from the purpose of
essential questions.
Performance Task
A task that uses ones knowledge to effectively act or bring to fruition
a complex product that reveals ones knowledge and expertise. Music
recitals, oral presentations, art displays, and automechanic competitions
are performances in both senses.
Perspective
One of the six facets of understanding. The ability to see other plausible points of view. It also implies that understanding enables a distance
from what one knows, an avoidance of getting caught up in the views
and passions of the moment.
Prerequisite Knowledge and Skill
The knowledge and skill required to successfully perform a culminating performance task or achieve a target understanding. Typically,
prerequisites identify the more discrete knowledge and know-how
199
required to put everything together in a meaningful nal performance.

For example, knowledge of the USDA food pyramid guidelines would
be considered a prerequisite to the task of planning a healthy, balanced
diet for a week.
Resultant Knowledge and Skill
Knowledge and skill that are meant to result from a unit of study. In
addition to the targeted understanding, teachers identify other desired
outcomes. Resultant knowledge and skill differs from prerequisite
knowledge and skill. Resultant knowledge is the goal of the unit. Prerequisite knowledge is what is needed to accomplish the goals of the
unit.
Self-Knowledge
One of the six facets of understanding. As discussed in the context of
the facets theory, self-knowledge refers to accuracy of self-assessment
and awareness of the biases in ones understanding because of favored
styles of inquiry, habitual ways of thinking, and unexamined beliefs.
Accuracy of self-assessment in this case means that the learners understand what they do not understand with clarity and specicity.
Transfer
The ability to use knowledge appropriately and fruitfully in a new or
different context from that in which it was initially learned. For example, students who understand the concepts of balanced diet transfers
that understanding by evaluating hypothetical diets for their nutritional
values and by creating nutritional menus.
Understanding
An insight into ideas, people, situations, and processes manifested in
various appropriate performances. To understand is to make sense of
what one knows, to be able to know why its so, and to have the ability
to use it in various situations and contexts.
Unit
Short for unit of study. Units represent a coherent chunk of work in
courses or strands, across days or weeks. An example is a unit on natural habitats and adaptation that falls under the year-long strand of living
things, under 3rd grade science, and under science.
W.H.E.R.E.T.O
An acronym for Where is it going?; Hook the students; Explore and
Equip; Rethink and Revise; Exhibit and Evaluate; Tailor to student
needs, interests, and learning styles; and Organize for maximum
200
R e s o u rc e s
engagement and effectiveness. Considered in greater detail,

W.H.E.R.E.T.O. consists of the following components:
Where is the work headed? Why is it headed there? What are the
students nal performance obligations, the anchoring performance assessments? What are the criteria by which student work
will be judged for understanding?
Hook the student through engaging and provocative entry points:
thought-provoking and focusing experiences, issues, oddities,
problems, and challenges that point toward essential questions,
core ideas, and nal performance tasks.
Explore and equip. Engage students in learning experiences
that allow them to explore the big ideas and essential questions
and that cause them to pursue leads or hunches, research and
test ideas, and try things out. Equip students for the nal performances through guided instruction and coaching on needed skills
and knowledge. Have them experience the ideas to make them
real.
Rethink and revise. Dig deeper into ideas at issue. Revise,
rehearse, and rene as needed. Guide students in self-assessment
and self-adjustment based on feedback from inquiry, results, and
discussion.
Evaluate understanding. Reveal what has been understood
through nal performances and products. Involve students in a
nal self-assessment to identify remaining questions, set future
goals, and point toward new units and lessons.
Tailor the work to ensure maximum interest and achievement.
Differentiate the approaches used and provide sufcient options
and variety to make it most likely that all students will be
engaged and effective.
Organize and sequence the learning for maximal engagement and
effectiveness, given the desired results.
201
References
Abrutyn, L. (2006). The most important data. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 5457.
Brown, J. L. (2004). Making the most of Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA:
Cassada, K. M., Stevens, C. J., & Wilson, J. S. (2005). School improvementaligned!
Educational Leadership, 62(Summer). Retrieved October 4, 2005, from www.ascd.org
/educationalleadership
Chapman, S., DArcangelo, M., Kiernan, L. J., & ONeil, J. (2003). Literacy Across the Curriculum: An ASCD Planner. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
Chappuis, J. (2005). Helping students understand assessment. Educational Leadership,
63(3), 3943.
Chrisman, V. (2005). How schools sustain success. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 1620.
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership,
61(8), 611.
Ferrero, D. J. (2005). Pathways to reform: Start with values. Educational Leadership, 62(5),
814.
Intrator, S. M. (2004). The engaging classroom, Educational Leadership, 62(1), 2025.
Lambert, L. (2005). Leadership for lasting reform. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 6265.
Langer, G. M., & Colton, A. B. (2005, February). Looking at student work, Educational
Leadership, 62(5), 22-27.
McTighe, J. & OConnor, K. (2005). Seven practices for effective learning. Educational
Leadership, 63(3), 1017.
McTighe, J., Seif, E., & Wiggins, G. (2004). You can teach for meaning, Educational Leadership, 62(1), 2631.
Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. M. (2004). A time and a place for authentic learning,
Educational Leadership, 62(1), 7377.
Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership,
63(3), 6670.
Waldron, D. (2006). My year as a high school student. Educational Leadership, 63(6),
6365.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design: Expanded second edition.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2006). Examining the teaching life. Educational Leadership
63(6), 2629.
202
R e s o u rc e s
Resources
Audios
Davis, K. (Presenter). (2003). Theory into practice: Understanding by Design in early
childhood. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
This presentation delivered at the 2003 ASCD Annual Conference discusses
the rst years of school as critical in laying the foundation for learning.
Emberger, M. A., Williamson, C., & Hershberger, D. H. (2002). Understanding by

Design: Backmapping our instruction and assessment to meet the needs of every child.
This presentation delivered at the 2002 ASCD Annual Conference explains
how staff members from a Maryland public school collected evidence of
understanding and helped educators use that evidence for instructional
decision making about how to meet the needs of every student. The presenters share a staff development model and a sample unit.
Emberger, M., and Hershberger, D. (2002). Understanding by Design: Using backwards

mapping to develop depth and breadth for middle schoolers. Alexandria, VA: Association
Participants in this 2002 ASCD Annual Conference session examine an interdisciplinary unit to experience how educators are successfully organizing
using the Understanding by Design model.
Katherman, H., Hubbard, D. M., Robinson-Simpson, G., & Pugh, C. (2002). What does
Understanding by Design have to do with professional development? Alexandria, VA:
At the 2002 ASCD Annual Conference, presenters from an urban school
district demonstrate how to use Understanding by Design to design professional development for educators.
McTighe, J. (2004). Strategies for effective questioning: Essential questions as doorways to

understanding. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
In a presentation at the 2004 ASCD Annual Conference, McTighe explores
the characteristics of good essential questions, reviews examples, and
shows how to generate questions for curriculum planning.
McTighe, J., & Thomas, R. S. (2002). Applying Understanding by Design to school

improvement planning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
This 2002 ASCD Annual Conference session examines how the Understanding by Design framework can lead to a deeper understanding of assessment
data as well as the root causes of current levels of student performance. It
also examines how the three stages of backward design can help determine
effective actions to increase achievement.
203
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2002). Understanding by Design: Structures and strategies
for designing school reform. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
At the 2002 ASCD Annual Conference, presenters in this session explore
how teaching for understanding affects leadership practices, school structures, and decision making in districts.
Wiggins, G. (2001). Designing instruction around questions, not content. Alexandria,

VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
This session from the 2001 ASCD Teaching and Learning Conference
focuses on the role of questions in curriculum design, drawing on the most
recent work from the authors of Understanding by Design, and explores
participants questions through a series of thought-provoking and practical
exercises and design experiences.
Wiggins, G. (2004). Strategies for student self-evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.
In a presentation from the 2004 ASCD Annual Conference, Wiggins explores
how teaching students to self-assess and self-adjust are keys to high levels
of performance. Participants explore 13 concrete and proven strategies for
improving student self-evaluation in any subject.
Wiggins, G., McTighe, J., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Understanding by Design and Differentiated Instruction: Partners in classroom success. Alexandria, VA: Association for
In a presentation from the 2003 ASCD Annual Conference, Wiggins and
Tomlinson examine the important connections between the Understanding
by Design and Differentiated Instruction models.
Zmuda, A. (2003). Asking what matters: Essential questions. Alexandria, VA: Association
In this session from the 2003 ASCD Annual Conference, Zmuda examines
how essential questions function as a bridge between engagement and
understandingan integral component of both a differentiated classroom
and the Understanding by Design model.
Books
Aseltine, J. M., Faryniarz, J. O., Rigazio-Digilio, & A. J. (2006). Supervision for learning:
A performance-based approach to teacher development and school improvement, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Although traditional ways of supervising and evaluating educators focus on
their inputstheir lesson plans and instructionwhat really matters most
are the outputs: how students perform. This book helps you transform
your supervisory system into a performance-based model that connects to
student achievement and teacher professional development.
Brown, J. L. (2004). Making the most of Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA:

Explore how high-level users of ASCDs Understanding by Design have
applied this framework to improve both student achievement and organizational effectiveness.
204
R e s o u rc e s
DAcquisto, L. (2006). Learning on display: Student-created museums that build understanding. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Through photographs and lots of classroom examples, the authoran
experienced curriculum director, teacher, and museum educatorguides
you through every step of designing museum projects that teach students
core content, along with valuable research and communication skills.
Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating Differentiated Instruction and

Understanding by Design: Connecting content and kids. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Find out how a curriculum built on the goal of student understanding, integrated with instructional approaches that emphasize reaching every learner,
can provide educators with more specic teaching targets and more exible
ways to reach them.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2004). Understanding by Design professional development

workbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Implementing an Understanding by Design program is much easier when
you use this in-depth resource for workshops, curriculum teams, and
teacher training.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design: Expanded second edition.
In this expanded second edition, educators from kindergarten through college can get everything they needguidelines, stages, templates, and tips
to start designing lessons, units, and courses that lead to improved student
performance.
Online Products
Understanding by Design: An Introduction. Available through http://pdonline.ascd.org
This seven-lesson course introduces educators in all grades and subjects
to the Understanding by Design program for curriculum, instruction, and
assessment.
Understanding by Design: The Six Facets of Understanding. Available through

http://pdonline.ascd.org
This seven-lesson course explores the six facets of understanding. These
six interrelated behaviors provide avenues through which educators can
observe and evaluate students growing understanding of the curriculum
they are studying.
Understanding by Design: The Backward Design Process. Available through

http://pdonline.ascd.org
This six-lesson course is designed to help practitioners describe, explain,
and apply the design principles and strategies associated with the Understanding by Design framework.
205
Understanding by Design Exchange, Version 2. Available at

http://ubdexchange.ascd.org
Through the Exchange, you can create and send original units for expert
and peer reviews. While working within the Exchange, search the extensive
database for units to edit and add to your unit repository.
Video
Kiernan, L. J. (Producer). (19982000). Understanding by Design video staff development
series. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Through the three parts of this program (What Is Understanding?; Using
the Backward Design Process; Rening Unit Designs), Grant Wiggins and
Jay McTighe explain the six facets of understanding and guide you through
the steps of designing curricular units that promote deep understanding of
content. Interviews with educators describe real-world applications of the
unit-planning process.
206
Association for Supervision and

Curriculum Development

Moving Forward With Understanding by Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Moving Forward With Understanding by Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Moving Forward With Understanding by Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the main purposes of the program discussed in the document?

What are the main purposes of the program discussed in the document?

What resources are mentioned that provide additional information about Understanding by Design?

What resources are mentioned that provide additional information about Understanding by Design?

A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u p e r vision and C ur r iculum De ve lop me nt

A l exand r ia, Vir g inia USA

About the Developers

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Understanding by Design: The Experts and Practitioners Speak

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

LIST OF REPRODUCIBLE MATERIALS

Understanding by Design: An Overview

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Small Study Independent

LIST OF REPRODUCIBLE MATERIALS (continued)

Leadership for Lasting Reform and Guiding Questions (3.2)

Small Study Independent

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Background Information for Moving Forward with

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

(2005, p. 7). In todays world, students need to be able to do more than

Purpose of the Program

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

About the Program

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

3. To what extent can I expect to observe different levels of use and

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Customize the Program for Your Professional

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

for small-team activities such as reading groups or small study

Large group activities can be an effective way to establish a common

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Road Map Organizer

Start with a whole-group

Bring the group together

Allow individuals to create

Encourage group work on

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Specically, this approach is ideal for participants interested in moving

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

The elementary, middle, and high school classroom examples

Small study groups are a popular form of school-based professional

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Independent study can consist of whatever viewing and user guide

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Understanding by Design: An Overview

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Large Group Directions

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Understanding by Design: An Overview

K = What do you think

L = What have you

Small Study Group

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Large Group Directions

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Understanding by Design: An Overview

You Can Teach for Meaning

Teaching for meaning is an engaging idea, but