Calculating Limits
Calculating Limits
Calculating Limits
f(x)
g(x)
=
lim
xa
f(x)
lim
xa
g(x)
(vi ) Power Law:
lim
xa
(f(x))
n
= (lim
xa
f(x))
n
(vii ) Root Law:
lim
xa
n
f(x) =
n
lim
xa
f(x)
provided if n is even we have
lim
xa
f(x) > 0.
In addition to these limit laws, we shall assume the following limits of
two simple functions:
1
2
Result 1.2. (Limits of Constant and Identity Functions) If c is a con-
stant, the following limits are true:
(i )
lim
xa
c = c
(ii )
lim
xa
x = a
The limit laws can be used to evaluate limits for many algebraic func-
tions. We illustrate with some examples.
Example 1.3. Evaluate the following limits stating the limit laws used
in each step.
(i )
lim
x2
x
2
2x
x 1
lim
x2
x
2
2x
x 1
Quotient
=
lim
x2
x
2
2x
lim
x2
x 1
Dierence
=
lim
x2
x
2
lim
x2
2x
lim
x2
x lim
x2
1
Power
=
(lim
x2
x)
2
lim
x2
2x
lim
x2
x lim
x2
1
Constant Multiple
=
(lim
x2
x)
2
2 lim
x2
x
lim
x2
x lim
x2
1
Constant
=
(lim
x2
x)
2
2 lim
x2
x
(lim
x2
x) 1
Identity
=
2
2
2 2
2 1
= 0
(ii )
lim
x8
e
2
+ 1
lim
x8
e
2
+ 1
Constant
= e
2
+ 1
Example 1.4. Show that the limit of a dierence of functions may
exist even though the individual limits exist.
Consider the functions f(x) =
1
x
and g(x) =
1
x
. Then we have f(x)
g(x) = 0 for x = 0, so the limit exists at x = 0 and is equal to 0.
However, the limits of the functions f(x) and g(x) do not exist. Note
that this tells us that in order to apply the limit laws, the limit of
the functions must exist - however, just because the limits do not
exist, does not mean that the limit of the corresponding combination
of functions does not exist.
Our previous results and the previous examples suggest the following
result.
3
Result 1.5. (Direct Substitution) If f is an algebraic function and a
is in the domain of f(x), then
lim
xa
f(x) = f(a).
In particular, limits of all rational functions and polynomials can be
evaluated using direct subsitution.
2. Other Limit Laws
The next example shows a similar result to direct substitution holds
in certain special circumstances even though a function may not be
dened at a particular point.
Example 2.1. Evaluate
lim
x2
x
2
+ x 6
x 2
.
Observe that
x
2
+ x 6
x 2
=
(x 2)(x + 3)
x 2
= x + 3
for all x = 2. In particular, if they agree for all dierent values except
at x = 2, then they must have the same values close to x = 2 and
consequently the same limit. Thus
lim
x2
x
2
+ x 6
x 2
= lim
x2
(x 2)(x + 3)
x 2
= lim
x2
x + 3 = 5
by direct subsitution.
Note that in order to nd the limit in the previous example, we used
the fact that the function agreed with another function at all points
except the point where we were evaluating the limit and noting that
the limit does not care about what happens at the point. This can be
formalized as follows:
Result 2.2. (Replacement Theorem) If f(x) = g(x) for all x in an
open interval containing x = a except possible when x = a, then
lim
xa
f(x) = lim
xa
g(x)
provided this limit exists.
We illustrate with a couple of other examples.
Example 2.3. (i ) Evaluate
lim
h0
(x + h)
2
x
2
h
.
We have
lim
h0
(x + h)
2
x
2
h
= lim
h0
x
2
2xh h
2
x
2
h
= lim
h0
2xh + h
2
h
= lim
h0
2x+h = 2x
4
by the replacement Theorem and direct substitution.
(ii )
lim
t0
1
t
1
t
2
+ t
We have
lim
t0
1
t
1
t
2
+ t
= lim
t0
t
2
+ t
t
3
+ t
2
t
t
3
+ t
2
= lim
t0
t
2
t
2
(t + 1)
= lim
t0
1
t + 1
= 1
by the replacement Theorem and direct substitution.
In addition to the laws we have already stated, there are a number of
other results which can be used to calculate limits. We list them below
and then nish with some examples of how they can be applied.
Result 2.4. If f(x) g(x) when x is near a (except possibly at a)
and then limits of both f and g exist at a, then
lim
xa
f(x) lim
xa
g(x).
Result 2.5. (The Squeeze Theorem) If f(x) g(x) h(x) when x is
near a (except possibly at a) and then limits of both h and f exist at
a and
lim
xa
f(x) = lim
xa
h(x) = L
then
lim
xa
g(x) = L.
Example 2.6. (i ) Show that
lim
x0
|x|
x
does not exist.
Observe that
lim
x0
+
|x|
x
= 1
and
lim
x0
|x|
x
= 1.
Since the left and right hand limits do not match, it follows
that the limit does not exist at x = 1.
(ii ) Prove that
lim
x0
x
2
cos
2
x
= 0.
Since 1 cos (1/x) 1 for all x, it follows that
x
2
x
2
cos
2
x
x
2
.
5
Next observe that since
lim
x0
x
2
= lim
x0
x
2
= 0
by the squeeze theorem, it follows that
lim
x0
x
2
cos
2
x
= 0.