Shell Pakistan Ltd. saw improved financial performance in 2013 compared to 2012. The company earned a profit after tax of Rs. 1,061 million in 2013, compared to a loss in 2012. However, results are still not satisfactory due to high costs, taxes, and low fuel margins. Liquidity ratios show the company's current assets can only cover 90% of current liabilities, and quick assets can cover 34%, indicating liquidity issues. Leverage ratios show the company relied more on equity than debt in 2013 compared to 2012, with debt-to-equity and long-term debt-to-equity ratios improving. Inventory turnover also increased from 2012 to 2013, representing a positive sign. However, the company's liquidity
Shell Pakistan Ltd. saw improved financial performance in 2013 compared to 2012. The company earned a profit after tax of Rs. 1,061 million in 2013, compared to a loss in 2012. However, results are still not satisfactory due to high costs, taxes, and low fuel margins. Liquidity ratios show the company's current assets can only cover 90% of current liabilities, and quick assets can cover 34%, indicating liquidity issues. Leverage ratios show the company relied more on equity than debt in 2013 compared to 2012, with debt-to-equity and long-term debt-to-equity ratios improving. Inventory turnover also increased from 2012 to 2013, representing a positive sign. However, the company's liquidity
Shell Pakistan Ltd. saw improved financial performance in 2013 compared to 2012. The company earned a profit after tax of Rs. 1,061 million in 2013, compared to a loss in 2012. However, results are still not satisfactory due to high costs, taxes, and low fuel margins. Liquidity ratios show the company's current assets can only cover 90% of current liabilities, and quick assets can cover 34%, indicating liquidity issues. Leverage ratios show the company relied more on equity than debt in 2013 compared to 2012, with debt-to-equity and long-term debt-to-equity ratios improving. Inventory turnover also increased from 2012 to 2013, representing a positive sign. However, the company's liquidity
Shell Pakistan Ltd. saw improved financial performance in 2013 compared to 2012. The company earned a profit after tax of Rs. 1,061 million in 2013, compared to a loss in 2012. However, results are still not satisfactory due to high costs, taxes, and low fuel margins. Liquidity ratios show the company's current assets can only cover 90% of current liabilities, and quick assets can cover 34%, indicating liquidity issues. Leverage ratios show the company relied more on equity than debt in 2013 compared to 2012, with debt-to-equity and long-term debt-to-equity ratios improving. Inventory turnover also increased from 2012 to 2013, representing a positive sign. However, the company's liquidity
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17
Credit Analysis and Management
Analyse the latest annual Report of Shell
Pakistan Ltd.
Salman Muhammad (1102-BH-BAF-10)
Sir Muhammad Ashraf
June 16, 2014
In Pakistan, Shell has a robust downstream business, supplying, distributing and marketing a variety of fuels, and is one of the oldest and largest multinational companies in the country, enjoying a legacy since 1898. It also has a 26% share in the White Oil pipeline operated by Pak Arab Pipeline Company (PAPCO) and a 30% stake in Pakistan Refinery Limited (PRL). Shell continues to play a leading role in meeting Pakistans growing energy demand, while prioritising Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) practices in all our operations and activities with our people, assets and communities we work in.
As the world shifts towards a new, low-carbon energy future, Shell is taking steps today to help build the energy system of tomorrow: producing more cleaner-burning natural gas; working to deliver advanced fuels and lubricants and lower-carbon bio fuels; and building capabilities in carbon capture and storage. It is because of this that Shell is a preferred innovative energy company.
During 2013, the Company earned a profit after tax of Rs.1, 061 million against a loss after tax of Rs.1, 935 million (restated) in the same period last year. The Companys performance has witnessed a significant recovery and our results have started to reflect the continued focus by management to improve operating performance. This was achieved by concerted efforts to increase our market share as well as to restrict costs, notwithstanding a high inflationary environment.
Despite this significant improvement compared with last year, financial results of the Company are still not satisfactory. High cost of funding government receivables, a disproportionate and punitive income tax regime and extremely low fuel margins continued to affect the profitability of your Company. The impact of high rupee depreciation in the second half of 2013 also had a significant impact on the financial performance.
Overall market conditions remained competitive and despite the challenges, we continue to maintain our position as the second largest Oil Marketing Company in Pakistan.
Despite the challenges faced, the Companys underlying operational performance during 2013 generally improved. The Company gained market share in both Motor Gasoline and Diesel for Retail business and significantly grew profitability of its Aviation and Lubricants business segments.
Financial risk refers to the chances of collapse of a business due to wrong financing policies/decisions/strategies such as lopsided capital structure and asset-liability mismatch. Financial risk can plunge a successful business to the brink of bankruptcy, if not into it. Hence, it is very vital for a credit decision to have an in-depth financial analysis of the customer.
In order to analysis the financial risks of a company the financial statements are looked upon for comparison using percentages and ratios. Financial statements, the end product of accounting, are viewed as proxies of economic activities and business performance. Analysis of financial statements enjoys a prominent place in the assessment of the study of credit risks, lending decisions and on going monitoring of the lending portfolio.
Four main categories of ratios for credit analysis are:
1. Liquidity Ratios: Indicate the companys ability to meet short-term obligations, continue operations and remain solvent. 2. Leverage Ratios: Shows the capital structure, the mix of the owners funds and funds borrowed from others. 3. Profitability Ratios: Indicates the earnings potential and its impact on shareholder returns. 4. Operating Ratios: Demonstrates how efficiently the assets are being utilized to generate revenue.
Liquidity Ratios:
The liquidity ratios reflect the sufficiency of cash in the firm to meet its liabilities. Those liabilities maturing for payment within the next 12 months are termed current liabilities. Such liabilities will be paid through generating cash and other liquid assets through working capital operating cycle.
1. Current Ratio:
Numerator: Current Assets Denominator: Current Liabilities
Current Ratio For Shell Pakistan 2013,
The current ration of 0.904 indicates that the current assets in the form of cash, inventory and receivables are sufficient to pay 90% over the current liabilities falling due for payment in the next 12 months.
2. Quick Ratio or Acid Test Ratio:
Numerator: Current assets less inventory or cash + account receivables
Denominator: Current Liabilities (Including bank borrowings against inventory)
In a crisis it may be difficult to dispose off the inventory of a firm. Hence inventory and other less liquid assets are excluded to determine a conservative measure of liquid funds of the borrower. A ratio of 1 or more than 1 is considered satisfactory.
Acid Test Ratio for Shell Pakistan,
The Liquid assets recoverable at hand are only 36% over the current liabilities, which is not satisfactory for the lending company.
3. Net Working Capital:
The Net Working Capital is a measure of Owners stake or long-term liquid fund in the firm. It has a close relationship with the current ratio. When the current ratio equals 1, the net working capital is zero.
Net Working Capital Ratio for Shell Pakistan,
Other measure used to determine liquidity:
Ageing Receivables:
Ageing schedule of accounts receivable. The risk analyst checks the list of the account receivables and takes note of how old each receivable is and compares the same with industry profile. Comparatively ageing receivables reflect poorly on the liquidity of the subject enterprise.
4. Inventory Turnover:
Numerator: Cost of Goods Sold
Denominator: Average Inventory
This Ratio measures the number of times, on average; the inventory is sold during a year. Its purpose is to measure the liquidity of the inventory.
Inventory Turnover for Shell Pakistan
For Inventory turnover only a comparison with industry average or historical comparison can be meaningful. So, in 2012 the inventory turnover is 12.084 and in 2013 it is 14.745. Which means that the average number of times the inventory sold during the year of Shell Pakistan has increased which means that the revenue has increased from the previous year.
Looking at the liquidity ratios for Shell Pakistan the current ratio shows that the current assets can only cover 90% over the current liabilities in a period of 12 months.
The Acid test ratio indicates that the recovery of only most liquid assets possible is at 34%, which is not a very good sign for the financial institutions.
The net working capital is negative i.e. below unity. The Current liabilities exceed the current assets by an amount of -3171604, which implies that the lending bank is running a more than normal financial risk in respect to Shell Pakistan.
Inventory turnover has increased from the previous year, which is a positive sign for the lending institutions.
The Liquidity Ratios in respect for Shell Pakistan do not seem to be so favourable for them when regarded in respect for borrowings by the lending institutions for approval of finance for the company.
Leverage Ratios:
These Ratios reflect the financial risk inherent in the borrower firm. The Banks needs to assess the leverage of the borrower from the viewpoint of debt service, the firm size, and industry practices.
1. Debt-Equity Ratio:
Numerator: Total Outside Liabilities (long + short term liabilities)
Denominator: Tangible Net Worth (Generally equity + reserves Intangible assets)
This Ratio is intended to measure the long-term solvency of the firm and the relative stakes of the capital holders of the firm, debt holders vs. equity holders.
In 2012, Shell Pakistans Debt to Equity Ratio was 6.657 whereas in 2013 it is 4.620, which is a good sign as Shell Pakistan is more relying on its equity than its debt comparatively to the year 2012.
2. Long-Term Debt to Equity Ratio:
Numerator: Long Term Debt (Existing + Proposed)
Denominator: Tangible Net Worth
This Ratio would indicate long-term solvency of the firm. It is important to consider the measure/size of this ratio when evaluating long-term project loan for a company.
The long-term Debt to Equity ratio of the firm indicates that Shell Pakistan has less long-term debts than the short-term debts. In 2012, the ratio was 0.057 and in 2013 it has improved even more to 0.0462, relying more on equity than debt.
3. Interest Coverage Ratio:
Numerator: Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT)
Denominator: Interest Expense.
The larger the ratio, the better for the bank, since it indicates the number of times the EBIT is larger than the interest due to the bank and other lenders.
As Shell Pakistan bears no interest expense the ratio equals to zero, indicating that there is no interest expense but only taxation is deducted from the EBIT.
4. Debt Service Coverage Ratio:
Numerator: EBIT+ Depreciation + Principal repayment on existing and proposed loans.
Denominator: Annual Debt service. i.e. total of interest and instalment payments on existing and proposed loans.
This and its variations are one of the most important ratios for assessing the debt service capacity of the firm or its new project over a period of time the ratio measures the number of times the firm can pay its debt commitments with current earnings.
As there is no debt, interest expense or existing and proposed loans for Shell Pakistan there is no need for this leverage Ratio.
5. Net Fixed Assets to Tangible Net Worth Ratio:
Numerator: Net Fixed Assets (gross fixed assets less depreciation)
Denominator: Tangible Net Worth
This Ratio Indicates how much of the firms least liquid assets have been financed by net worth. It also serves as a variation of the equity multiplier, and shows how much of the owners funds have gone into financing fixed assets. A higher Ratio also means that more fixed assets have been financed from debt rather than by internal generation. This ratio is, therefore, a measure of risk inherent in the borrower firm.
The net fixed assets to tangible net worth ratio Is lower than it was in 2012 which means that Shell Pakistan has used more of its internal financing than using debts to acquire fixed assets, which also indicates that the company relies more on its own equity than debt.
6. Dividend Pay-out Ratio:
Numerator: Cash Dividends Paid
Denominator: Net Profit After Tax
The more the dividends paid, the happier the equity holders are. However, more dividends also mean less cash available as retained earnings.
Shell Pakistan had a loss in profit after tax and still managed to pay cash dividends in 2012 whereas profit had been earned in 2013 and the dividends were paid a lesser amount than 2012. Typically a bank is wary of high dividend payouts by the borrower. The less the equity the more the risk for the lending bank, and the less the internal generation available for new projects, the more the demand for bank debt.
Profitability Ratios:
The banks expects the borrowing firm to conduct its business prudently, mitigate risks, be cost effective and thus generate enough profits to cover long-term debt obligations; taxes and other statutory payments; pay reasonable dividends to equity holders; and thereafter leave a surplus for plough back into reserves or invest in high yielding projects.
1. Return on Equity (ROE):
Numerator: Net Income
Denominator: Average total equity
The amount of net income returned as a percentage of shareholders equity. Return on equity measures a corporations profitability by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have invested.
In 2012, Shell Pakistan had a negative return on equity whereas in 2013 it has a positive ROE, which shows a positive return on shareholders investment.
2. Return on Assets:
Numerator: Net Income
Denominator: Average Total Assets
The more the assets have been worked for higher returns, the higher the ROA, further, ROA is the product of the profit margin, a measure of expense control, and asset utilization, the gross yield on assets.
This Ratio is a measure of the effectiveness and skills of the management as to how productively have they used the assets of the enterprise to earn profits, which is totally positive in 2013 but a negative ratio in 2012 because of the net loss of Shell Pakistan.
3. Sales Growth:
Numerator: Change in sales
Denominator: Last periods Sales
A simple and efficient indicator of top line growth. Any credit analysis has to begin with assessing how realistic the projections of sales growth are.
There has been 17.8% growth in Sales of Shell Pakistan from 2012.
4. Gross Profit Ratio:
Numerator: Net Sales COGS
Denominator: Net Sales
This Ratio measures the manufacturing efficiency in the case of manufacturing firms and the direct contribution from sales in other firms. This ratio measures operational efficiency.
Sales have increased from 2012 and hence the gross profit has increased and so has the gross profit ratio, which shows operational efficiency has increased comparatively.
Operating Ratios:
Operating ratios measure the operational efficiency and the liquidity of the current assets of the borrower firm.
1. Debtors Velocity:
Numerator: Average receivables outstanding
Denominator: Average daily sales
This ratio indicates the average number of days required to convert sales into cash. The actual collection period so obtained is to be compared with the firms credit policy to establish the firm ability to collect on its receivables.
2. Creditors Velocity:
Numerator: Average outstanding of accounts payable
Denominator: Average daily purchases
This Ratio indicates the time lag between a purchase and its payment. The more credit availed from its suppliers; the less a firm requires bank credit.
The Average collection period of sales in 2012 was 2.9 days and in 2013 2.86 days which means that the collection period of sales has decreased which is good for Shell Pakistan and satisfactory for the Lending institutions but the average payment period for purchases was 166.83 in 2012 and 138.78 in 2013 which is good from the suppliers perspective and the lending institutions.
3. Sales To Fixed Assets:
This ratio shows how efficiently the fixed assets are used to generate production and hence sales. In 2012 the ratio was 19.72 whereas it has drastically increased in 2013 to 26.84.
4. Sales to Total Assets:
This ratio indicates how efficiently the company generates sales on each dollar of assets. A volume indicator, this ratio measures the ability of the companys assets to generate sales. Sales to total assets ratio has increased in 2013 respective to the one in 2012.
The operating Ratios of Shell Pakistan are considerably good which means that the operation of Shell Pakistan is quite well comparatively to the previous years. Where as the profitability ratios also show a growth in sales and a better return on equity, which may be the indicator that Shell Pakistan is progressing to a better stage in the Industry.
The Leverage ratios of Shell Pakistan are not of any concern as they are not involved in any long-term debts and are not paying any kind of interest expense, which is good to know for the lending institutions but Shell Pakistan pays out dividends even when loss occurs.
In summary, 2013 has been a year of significant improvement in the performance of the Company. Shell looks forward to continue improvement in 2014 and beyond. A critical enabler of this will be repayment of government receivables and improvements in the regulatory and tax environment. The management of Shell Pakistan continues to work on further improving its operational performance as well as engaging with relevant authorities on resolution of government related issues.