Being and Nothingness The Look Sartre

Download as docx
Download as docx
You are on page 1of 3

Being and Nothingness / The Look / Sartre

By: Gabriel Moreno


When does an individual figure out he or she is not alone in the world? It
is when a person realizes the reality of other minds. It is important for that
individual to first realize their own existence to understand that there are
others in the world. Sartre acknowledges this by writing “I am in a public
park.” This park has benches, grass, and Sartre sees a man. This man at first
for Sartre is seen as another object just like the lawn and benches. There
develops if this man is a “puppet,” then he will give him “temporal-spatial
things” qualities, that is the distance from the lawn, in this case “two yards
and twenty inches from the lawn.” There is a realization of the environment
one is living in at the moment. Sartre is in a public park with benches along
the lawn and there is this object. Orientation of all the objects is then
described. Sartre sees himself as the center of his universe. Sartre sees the
probability that the object might be a man acknowledging the same lawn he
is looking at. Sartre includes that the man could even be imagining or
thinking about something else or even being blind. We can never know what
another individual is experiencing. We constantly will ask the question of
what another is thinking but can we ever know? Probably not but it should be
accepted that we think of things differently in so far as everyone experience
of life is different.

Everyone’s experience is different because they see the world from a


different aspect. A blind man will experience the world different from another
person with the sense of sight. If the blind man is given an operation to be
able to see he will still experience the world differently from that a person
that has been able to see their whole life. Sartre believes his world is
beginning to escape him because this object-man and object-lawn are no
longer his experience but that of the man on the bench. What is known as
my universe quickly becomes his universe. The man on the bench becomes
the middle while Sartre becomes a temporal-spatial object, something not in
the middle anymore. It is my consciousness which creates the world I live in,
and the appearance of the Other’s consciousness only takes my world away.
There is a loss of my world and the loss of my freedom to structure my world
and consciousness. The Other has stolen the world from me and left me as a
mere object, the very same type Sartre saw when first acknowledging the
Other object on the bench across from him. This loss of me as for-itself is not
a total loss. As long as I am at least an object in the world, I stay away from
being nothing.

How can I recover my world and consciousness when my existence has


begun dependable upon the Other? What I am for-myself, my nature, my
essence, and everything that is in the “I” is dependent on the Other, but the
Other’s experience of me is my responsibility, my freedom. I create what the
Other sees of me, my facticity. Sartre makes eye contact with the Other as a
common stare down that occurs in everyday life. Why does someone
become startled when making direct eye contact with another? There
develops the reality there are Others in the world. In the context of a
rebellion we try to gain control of the world taken from us and not let
ourselves be held down by our own self-victimization. Sartre writes that we
are “condemned to be free.” The anguish lived drives us to gain control of
our world. It is almost like we desire to become God but are stopped by the
realization of someone else in the universe. Who is this Other sitting on the
bench? Is that Other trying to be God? Our minds are created to work the
same way. Some people are smarter than others but that is not what is
trying to be said. We all seek an ultimate perfection that is like that of God.
And there is a certain alienation that is felt when we recognize that we are
being recognized through eye contact with another person. Sartre enforces
that the Other cannot look at him as he looks at the lawn. Being-seen-by-
others creates a hell for us. The famous “hell is other people” takes place.
Something so simple as making eye contact creates all these thoughts within
our consciousness.
Shame can be seen closer in Sartre’s example of looking through a
keyhole. Sartre stares through the keyhole as to create the illusion that no
one can acknowledge him and take his world away from him. But all of a
sudden there is a sense that someone is watching him, the consciousness of
another presence, we become being-for-others. The very moment between
watching the keyhole and reflecting on his world escaping him is what is
known as shame. From this shame I fall into fear. I become aware of the
possibility of my destruction in the world by something outside of me. “I am
ashamed of myself,” and in more detail “I am ashamed of myself before the
Other.” We can drop the idea of our goal of perfection because shame is
shame before God because we do not really accept the Other as a person
but as an object. Thus it is only I and God and only I care what God thinks.
But then again we still carry the hell is other people and still continue to go
through the shame and fear. I anger at the thought that the Other takes my
world away but am comforted by anxiety, the freedom of consciousness to
do what I want in retaliation against the Other. I am responsible for my
future and fear is only my finding that I am an object transcended by
possibilities that are not my possibilities. I come to recognize the Other as a
subject beyond my reach through fear, shame, and pride. These are all
reactions to my action of “regaining my subjectivity by objectifying others—
making them into beings-for-others.”

You might also like