Independence Institute
IB-2000-O
Cara Morlan
Published July 26, 2000
Traditional bilingual education is based on the theory that the best way for minority language students to achieve English proficiency is to first strengthen their skills in their native tongues. Under this approach it will take a student four to seven years to become proficient in English.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Structured Immersion: An Alternative To Traditional Bilingual Education
Independence Institute
IB-2000-O
Cara Morlan
Published July 26, 2000
Traditional bilingual education is based on the theory that the best way for minority language students to achieve English proficiency is to first strengthen their skills in their native tongues. Under this approach it will take a student four to seven years to become proficient in English.
Original Title
Structured Immersion: An Alternative to Traditional Bilingual Education
Independence Institute
IB-2000-O
Cara Morlan
Published July 26, 2000
Traditional bilingual education is based on the theory that the best way for minority language students to achieve English proficiency is to first strengthen their skills in their native tongues. Under this approach it will take a student four to seven years to become proficient in English.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views11 pages
Structured Immersion: An Alternative To Traditional Bilingual Education
Independence Institute
IB-2000-O
Cara Morlan
Published July 26, 2000
Traditional bilingual education is based on the theory that the best way for minority language students to achieve English proficiency is to first strengthen their skills in their native tongues. Under this approach it will take a student four to seven years to become proficient in English.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11
Issue Backgrounder
Number: 2000-O0Date: July 26, 2000
Structured
Immersion: DAn
Alternative to
Traditional Bilingual
Education
Traditional Bilingual Education is based on the theory
that the best way for minority language students to
achieve English proficiency is to first strengthen their
skills in their native tongues. Under this approach
students learn to read and write in their native
language while supposedly receiving an increasing
amount of English instruction. Under this approach,
it will take a student anywhere between four to
seven years to be redesignated as English proficient.
The promised benefits under this approach are
continual progress in academic subjects and that
parents can be involved in their child’s education.
There are three other main approaches to bilingual
education. Submersion, in which no special
assistance is provided to the limited Englishproficient (LEP) students who simply take regular
classes with the mainstream students -- the sink or
swim approach. Second is English as a Second
Language, in which children attend regular classes
with an additional class each day for English
instruction. Finally, there is the Structured
Immersion approach: after one year of intensive
English instruction, children are placed in a special
class with similar students and a specially trained
teacher who can take into account their English
proficiency and who provides English instruction in
every subject. Under this increasingly popular
approach, the teaching of English occurs
simultaneously with the teaching of all other
subjects.
The national debate regarding bilingual! education
has arisen due to the fact that despite the good
intentions of many educators across the country,
traditional bilingual education has failed to provide
the vast majority of /Janguage minority students
(those students whose primary language is not
English) with the main skill necessary for academic,
financial, and social success in today’s competitive
market: mastery of the English language. Without
such knowledge Hispanic students are not receiving
the same opportunities for success and achievement
as their peers, and are being denied the opportunity
to achieve the American dream of making a better
life for themselves. California has implemented a
solution that warrants serious consideration.
In California, children enter school speaking one of140 different languages, yet only Spanish-speaking
students are put into traditional bilingual education
programs. These students are then the immigrant
group that does the worst in school, has the highest
dropout rate (50% for Hispanic immigrants
compared to about 10% of whites and blacks), the
lowest test scores and the lowest college
admissions.[1] With only 5% of students each year
being found to gain proficiency in English, California
was achieving a 95% failure rate.[2] In early 1996,
parents and students at 9" Street Elementary in
California decided that they would no longer tolerate
the inferior education of their children. They came up
with a solution: Proposition 227.
Proposition 227 mandates that students be placed in
a Structured Immersion program for one year during
which they receive intensive instruction in English
language skills. After the first year they are
transferred to a special classroom where, with peers
of similar abilities and a teacher who understands
their special language needs, they receive all
instruction for their academic coursework in English.
After two years of hard work and despite the
opposition of the chairmen from both parties, all four
governor hopefuls, and nearly all the newspapers
and educational organizations, the people of
California declared that Spanish-speaking students
would no longer be content being second class
citizens and receiving a second class education by
being the only immigrant students subjected to
traditional bilingual education. On June 2, 1998