CONVENTIONAL POWDERED METAL COMPONENTS

ABSTRACT Powder Metallurgy (PM) has advanced considerably during the last seventy years. This paper describes the conventional press & sinter process used for manufacturing highly sophisticated net-shape metal components. It highlights process advantages and the effects derived from material or process choices. Those choices must be understood when designing PM components since they significantly effect the physical and/or mechanical properties of the finished component.

WHAT IS PM? Powder Metallurgy or PM is a highly developed method of manufacturing precision metal parts. Over the last seventy years, the technology has matured from making selflubricating bearings for autos to complex carrier gear sets in automobile transmissions and high strength powder forged connecting rods in engines. When we use the term PM within the industry, it also refers to related technologies such as metal injection molding, isostatic pressing and powder forging. PM manufacturing technology consists of three steps; mixing elemental or alloy powders, compacting those powders in a die at room temperature and then sintering or heating the shape in a controlled atmosphere furnace to bond the particles together metallurgically. Generally, scrap rates for the process are less than 3 per cent. Because the process has so little waste and the part, is often finished when taken from the furnace, the process is very cost effective when compared to manufacturing processes that must contend with flash, machining chips, and sprues and gates. The speed of the presses is such that simple or complex parts can be made to close tolerances, often eliminating machining. Production runs range in number from a few hundred to thousands of parts per hour. Conventional PM parts are limited to parts which can be formed uniaxially. Frequently, the technology is used for material systems that are hard to machine such as tungsten or molybdenum or hard to cast due to detrimental solidification behavior of the material systems chosen. The utility of the process can also be found by combining previously separate shapes into a one-piece PM part, avoiding additional assembly or joining steps in the components design. In some cases, PM parts can be joined by bonding or other joining techniques to give greater utility to the designed component. Todays presses

enable parts to range between simple, single level shapes to complex, eight level shapes. The basic versatility of PM is demonstrated by the use of components in the automotive, aerospace, business machine, electronics and appliance markets. Thousands of different, reliable cost-saving designs now serve these industries. The average U. S. full-size passenger car contains more than 16.4 kilograms (36 pounds) of PM parts. PMs flexibility is becoming more pronounced with the advent of its use as a forming technique to manufacture components with very novel material combinations. The designer can adjust the chemistry and other PM characteristics, such as density, to provide a custom result, uniquely suited for the application. Materials can include ceramics, nanophase materials, semi-metals and functionally gradient materials.

THE ADVANTAGES OF THE PM PROCESS As we get more detailed in this discussion, it will become more apparent how the PM process delivers its many advantages. Perhaps PMs strongest benefit is its ability to eliminate or minimize machining. Tolerances, which I will compare later, are the key issue here. Like many component design processes, the earlier a competent PM parts designer is brought into the design process, the more likely a design can be optimized to meet the needs of the components function, which should be followed by form. Following on the minimization of machining, and since the component is shaped in a closed die, there is little or no trim or other process related scrap. Strict process control and the reproducibility inherent in the process result in consistent quality and little rejection due to off specification components. These days, close dimensional tolerances, are essential to the reliability and performance of an assembly. PMs ability to control tolerances is one of the secrets to its successful adoption in the conversion of many components from competing forming technologies. There is essentially no limit to the variety of alloy systems that can be used to produce a shaped component. This gives the designer considerable latitude in matching function and application requirements with a material system to meet those needs such as strength, corrosion resistance or other particular metallurgical or mechanical properties. PM parts have a surface finish of between 32 48 microinches (Ra). Produced from a die with surfaces of 20 32 microinches. PM parts can be enhanced using heat-treating, coining, burnishing or other secondary operations that can result in property improvement.

As we mentioned above, one of the first modern uses of PM components was in selflubricating bearings. By controlling the density and particle size, very specific pore characteristics can be designed into an application. If the porosity is interconnected, the component can be used in very fine, high temperature filter applications. Complex shapes can be made easily and efficiently. The ingenuity of the designer and the ability of the part to be ejected from the compaction die are the only limits to the choices. Most PM dies are made of high strength, durable alloys such as tungsten carbide or high-speed steel, which permits high volumes of parts to be produced before wear of the tooling becomes a consideration. Once a part is being produced in a steady-state fashion on a set of tools, the results are consistent from part -to -part. Since the dies and tooling are so durable, high volumes of parts can be economically produced at high speeds, subject to the limits of the press capacity. The largest market for PM components is the automotive sector. Nearly 70 % of all PM parts are used in this industry. The applications are frequently found in the drive train and transmission where the demands for performance and reliability are great. One major application is connecting rods. Millions of rods have been produced over the last twelve years, without a failure. Following on that comment, it goes without saying that the most cost conscious of buyers can be found in the auto industry. If PM werent economical, the auto industry would use a different technology. Most powder is produced from scrap metals and as such helps limit environmental impact through recycling. The net shape characteristic of the component and the limited use of energy for heating imply that a minimum amount of energy is used to meet the needs of the application. Minimizing machining lowers the likelihood of water pollution due to cutting fluids and oils.

THE BASIC PM PROCESS STEPS As mentioned above, the three basic steps for PM manufacturing are mixing, compacting and sintering. PM powders can be produced by taking elemental, partially alloyed or prealloyed metal powders and mixing them with lubricants such as graphite or waxes to produce a homogeneous mixture of ingredients. Since the density and consistency of fill of the die is important to maintain uniform part production, the importance of this step of the process can not be minimized. The additives can also be introduced to aid machinability, wear resistance or lubricity of the base alloy composition.

. A controlled amount of mixed powder is automatically gravity-fed into a precision die and is compacted. Usually this is done at room temperature at compaction pressures as low as 138 MPA (10 tons per square inch) to as high as 827 MPa (60 tons per square inch) depending on the density requirements of the part and powder being pressed. Normally the compaction pressures are 345 to 690 MPa (25 50 tons per square inch). The compacted or green part has the size and shape of the finished part when ejected and has sufficient green strength to be handled and transported to the sintering furnace. In the sintering step, the green compact is placed on a mesh belt, and slowly moves through a controlled atmosphere furnace where the parts are heated to a temperature below the melting point of the base metal, held at the sintering temperature and then cooled. The sintering step transforms compacted mechanical bonds between the powder particles into metallurgical bonds by a solid state transformation process

PM MATERIALS Metal Powders are precisely engineered materials that meet a wide range of performance requirements. These engineered materials offer wide latitude to develop materials with properties tailored to the application through metal alloying. These engineering properties are affected by several factors that include material type, powder fabrication process and the component manufacturing process. Basically four methods are used to produce powder: atomization, chemical, thermal and electrolytic. Choosing a method is determined by the economics, raw material and the desired particle shape, size and size distribution. The particle shape, size and size distribution profoundly affects the way the powder behaves during die filling, compaction and sintering. The range of shapes can be irregular, flake, dendritic and sponge (porous). Figure I displays the morphology of these shapes for various powders.

(Typical metal powder particle shapes: atomized Cu, water atomized Fe, sponge Fe, electrolytic Cu - upper left to lower right)

Figure I There are three types of powders. The first type is an admixed powder, so called because elemental powders such as copper, nickel and graphite are added to a base element powder such as iron or copper. These powders are used in circumstances where high purity is essential to material properties. Use of these elemental powders gives a manufacturer a lot of choice in tailoring the mixture to design requirements by mixing with other powders before pressing and sintering. However, elemental powders exhibit lower yield strength than prealloyed powders, allowing them to deform more readily during compaction, thereby improving density and green strength. They do not however, display the same degree of homogeneity of prealloyed powder during normal sintering. Partially alloyed powder is composed of two or more elements where the alloying additives are diffusion bonded to the base powder during the powder manufacturing process. This is done to enhance the compressibility of the base powder. These powders tend to be non-homogeneous, and therefore have diverse microstructures, but controllable phases. The chemistry can be closely controlled which enhances dimensional control. These materials also tend to have excellent fracture toughness. The last category, prealloyed powder, is typically atomized from alloyed furnace melts. Each particle has the same nominal composition as the next. Prealloyed powders yield homogeneous phase constituents throughout the microstructure. Prealloying is used to achieve alloys that are difficult to achieve by mixing elemental powders, such as stainless steel. In some cases, there are other additives in the powder mixtures, added for purposes such as lubrication, organic powders that vaporize during sintering to produce specific microporosity for filter applications and organic binders that allow the feedstock to be molded like the materials used in plastic injection molding. In addition to the metallurgical and chemical properties derived from the materials, there are a number of other properties that are important to a PM material. They include particle size distribution, particle shape, flow rate, bulk density, compressibility, green strength and the spring-back characteristics of the powder. Each of these properties has an effect on the workability, for lack of a better word, and the final characteristics and performance of a component.

THE PRESSING CYCLE The adjacent figure (FIGURE II) offers a schematic analysis of the compacting process in a traditional PM press.

Figure II The pressing cycle begins with the die receiving a charge of the mixed powder, delivered to the cavity by a feeder shoe that slides across the top of the tool set. The volume fed into the die is controlled by the relative position of the lower punch in the die. Once filled, the feed shoe withdraws and the next part of the cycle occurs as the upper and lower punches compress the powder into the die shape. When this step is completed, the upper punch withdraws and simultaneously, the lower punch rises, ejecting the pressed compact, and once clear, the feeder shoe pushes the compact away from the die cavity and another cycle of powder charging begins.

Powder characteristics have considerable impact on the final outcome of this portion of the process, particle shape effects bulk flow rate, bulk flow effects final density and the amount of powder delivered to the tooling, and compressibility effects the final density of the component. Consistent delivery of a specific amount of powder and exact repeatability of the relative motion of the punches in the die set is essential to consistent component properties. The behavior of powder during compaction significantly affects the properties. During the early stage of compaction, the particles reorient to a denser particle packing level with less microporosity, thus increasing surface contact between particles. As the compaction increases, plastic deformation of the particles occurs before the final stage of compaction when cold welding and interlocking of the particles occurs, imparting sufficient strength to the green part for ejection and further handling. The goal during the compaction cycle is to impart uniform density throughout. The mechanics of compaction are largely governed by friction between the die and the powder and between the powder particles. Hence, tooling is a critical element in the fabrication process. The suitability of a component for PM manufacture depends essentially on the issues of whether suitable, compaction tooling can be designed and built. There is no known theoretical limit to the size of a PM component. The final density and the available press size are the practical limits. As a practical guide, the projected area (area perpendicular to the pressing direction) usually is between 4 and 16,000 mm2 (.006 and 25 square inches), with length between 0.8 to 150 mm (.03 and 6 inches), although 75 mm (3 inches) is the practical maximum. There are parts weighing 11.4 kilograms (25 pounds) in production today. Figure III identifies the elements of a tool set which usually consists of a die body or mold, upper and lower punches and in some cases, one or more core rods.

Figure III

The initial cost of PM tooling depends upon the level of sophistication of the component to be produced. The tooling must be robust enough to last from several hundred thousand cycles to over a million cycles without wear and damage. The tools are subjected to high compaction pressures, often as high as 690 MPa (50 tsi) for some steel components, as well as the abrasive characteristics of the powders. The die set must be able to withstand radial pressure during compaction and hold tolerance in the horizontal direction of the component. The die set also tends to experience the most wear, especially along the walls due to the ejection motion of the green part. Its design must consider distribution of the gravity fed powder and the part size. Wider parts are possible if perpendicular dimensions are reduced so that the maximum projected area is not exceeded. Punches transmit pressure to the powder in the die cavity. Punches must be able to resist expanding under repeated compaction cycles. The punches must possess high compressive yield strength, toughness and fatigue strength. Core rods are used to shape through holes in the component. Like the dies, core rods should be made from cemented carbides. Cemented carbides impart high hardness and superior wear resistance to tool sets. During the compacting phase, core rods are subjected alternately to high compressive and high tensile stresses, especially if they are thin or have complicated profiles. PM components are typically classified into one of four classes according to their complexity. The complexity refers to the motion necessary to form a component. Class one refers to simple one level parts with a low length/diameter ratio. Class two components have a higher l/d ratio and require that the punches more from both directions to make sure that density is as uniform as possible throughout the component. Class three components are two level parts that must be pressed from two directions and Class four components are multi-level components that require pressing from two directions. Complex components formed using multiple punches and core rods can have five or more levels depending upon the complexity of the press. Todays presses enable parts to range between simple, single level shapes to complex, eight level shapes.

SINTERING The traditional furnace found in the PM industry is a mesh belt furnace with three operating zones; a pre-heat or de-lube zone, a hot zone and a cooling zone. The furnaces usually operate between 1120 to 1150 degrees centigrade (2050 and 2100 degree F) for ferrous parts and 790 to 845 degrees centigrade (1450- 1550 degrees F.) for bronze materials. The trip through the furnace for a single part takes about 2 to 3 hours, depending upon the size of the part. Some components are

sintered at a temperature 300 degrees Fahrenheit higher, a process called high temperature sintering, an effort made to enhance mechanical properties. Another variation on the process is called sinter-hardening, accomplished by using a controlled cooling rate in the cooling section of the belt furnace, transforming the steel matrix of a ferrous part to martensite, thereby eliminating the need for a secondary hardening step.

SECONDARY OPERATIONS With the exception of repressing, impregnation and infiltration, a sintered PM component can be finished or treated, if necessary, just like any other metal component. PM components can be plated or coated for corrosion resistance and can also accept a black oxide coating to act as a paint base. Deburring can be performed to relieve sharp edges and ferrous parts can be burnished to control size and surface finish. Ferrous PM components can be successfully welded using just about any welding technique, given allowances for density, alloy composition, proper joint design and elimination of contaminants. Furnace brazing is often used to join other materials. PM components can be heat treated to improve strength and hardness and can be steam treated to make the surface hard and more wear resistant and well as contributing to improved corrosion resistance and the sealing of porosity. Repressing or coining is performed on PM components to densify or modify the surface shape and provide stricter dimensional control. This can also be achieved by sizing a component. Oil impregnation, used on PM self-lubricating bearing components since the late 1920s, involves either soaking or vacuum processing. The components can absorb between 12 and 30 % oil by volume. Resin impregnation is performed on PM components to improve machinability or to prepare the surface for plating by making the surface liquid or gas tight and the surface pore free. Infiltration is a secondary process step used to either improve strength or seal parts and make them gas or liquid tight. Optional, like resin impregnation, it can also be used to enhance machinability and improve ductility and prepare parts for plating. It is not used to prevent PM defects.

DESIGN DETAILS As mentioned above, holes are produced by core rods, which can be round, D-shaped, or include keyways or splines. They can also be used to provide lightening holes to reduce the projected pressing area.

Wall thickness is always a careful consideration. Since die fill is important to get uniform density, long thin walls are a challenge and are seldom less than 1.52 mm (.060 inches) or have a length to thickness ratio exceeding 8 to 1. Thin walls result in fragile tools. Flat components pose a distortion problem during sintering. As such, flat parts are not the best application for PM. Often, repressing is required to improve flatness. Most PM components do not require draft on the sides of parts. Generally, fillet radii are most desirable. Tooling with generous fillets tends to last longer and result in higher component manufacturing speeds and greater tool integrity. Chamfer is a feature employed to prevent burring on part edges. Countersinks are formed by a punch around a hole to accommodate a screw or a bolt head. Flanges are produced by machining a shelf or step into the die. Bosses are forming cavities often located in punch tools. There are a few rules about depth of cavity exceeding part heights, generally restricted to less than 15%. A hub feature on a part should include a generous radius between the hub and the flange section and to maximize the space between hub outside diameter and gear or sprocket root diameters. Studs with drafted sides can be made like bosses, however, always consider the fragility of the green compact prior to sintering. Grooves can be pressed into either end of a part from projections on the punch face. Deep, narrow slots require fragile tooling and should be avoided. Undercuts on the horizontal plane (perpendicular to the pressing direction) cannot be formed, except when machined as a secondary operation, as they inhibit part ejection. If there is a juncture undercut, the alternative is to press a semicircular groove at the horizontal portion of the juncture.

TOLERANCES In general, the dimensional tolerances that can be held in the PM process compare favorably with other metal forming processes. The tighter the tolerances, the greater the cost. Economically, tolerances no closer than necessary should be specified. The limits on tolerances depend on orientation of the dimension to the pressing direction,

10

size, component complexity type of material, process variations and secondary operations. Radial dimensions are controlled by the dimension of the tools, while the axial dimensions are controlled by the motions of the press and the accuracy of the fill, thus requiring more latitude. Dimensional tolerances are proportional to the size of the part in the radial direction. Complex parts require increased tool complexity and thus more relative tool movement and the press movements contribute to component tolerances. Run-out tolerances on components with a hole, such as a gear, is affected not only by die accuracy, but also by the required running clearances of the tool set and the condition of the compaction press. Flatness is a function of component thickness and surface area. Thinner parts will tend to distort during sintering and shapes with unequal thickness may have density variations which will make flatness difficult to maintain. Powder formulation can affect components with variations in density, chemistry and reaction to the furnace atmosphere during sintering. Tool wear is an obvious source of variation in tolerancing components. Coining or sizing can improve tolerances. The following table (I) offers typical tolerances for a ferrous PM component measuring up to 100 mm (4 inches) in diameter and 25 mm (1inch) thick. Table I Pressed and Sintered Tolerances Practical Possible mm (in.) mm (in.) 0.190 .0075 0.130 .005 Length (+/-) 0.100 .004 0.050 .002 Inside diameter (+/-) 0.100 .004 0.050 .002 Outside Diameter (+/-) 0.150 .006 0.100 .004 Concentricity 0.130 .005 0.100 .004 Flatness on ends 0.130 .005 0.100 .004 Parallelism of ends

Engineering Properties The first three properties of density, porosity and permeability are inter-related. Porosity is the converse of density which is often expressed as relative density, the ratio of a parts density to that of its pore-free equivalent. The most common approach is to express the density in grams per cubic centimeter. Porosity is present as a network of interconnected pores that extend to the surface like a sponge or as a number of closed holes within the part. In the first case, porosity is important to the function of the design. In the latter case, less porosity is better. The porosity is a controllable function of the

11

raw material and processing techniques. Permeability can be designed into a PM component to vary between a highly restricted to open flow. Like wrought metals, PM components and materials use ultimate tensile and yield strength to indicate the strength of an alloy. This property is heavily dependent upon density. Impact energy is also affected by density. In some PM material systems, such as stainless steels, the yield strength may exceed the strength of wrought materials. Ductility is relatively low in PM materials due to the presence of pores in the material. This property can be improved by hot or cold repressing and resintering. Hardness of PM parts cannot be directly compared using standard hardness testing equipment scales. It is measured as apparent hardness, which takes into account the combination of particle hardness and porosity. Standard testing equipment often displaces particle or sees excessive compression of the surface. Corrosion resistance is hampered by the porous nature of PM components, but stainless steel parts have relatively good corrosion resistance. Other non-ferrous alloys have corrosion resistance similar to wrought components. Excellent surface finish is inherent is PM components. The overall smoothness and surface reflectivity depends upon density, tool finish and any secondary operations. Profilometer readings on PM components are taken with a chisel stylus to account for pores of varying sizes. PM finishes compare well with wrought or cast components Like conventional wrought steels, PM components are hardenable. Table II is a comparative sample of PM properties with a wrought material (4340).
C NI CU Mn CR T.S. MPa (ksi) Y.S MPa (ksi) Elong % Hardness

4340 *
@1000

.4

F .6 .9

1.65 2.00 1.0 3.0 0.0 2.5

.6 - .8

.7 - .9

1240 (180) 1340 (195)

1160 (168) 1240 (180)

17

39 HRC 42 HRC

FN 0208
(180 HT) 3 7.4 g/cm

.5

FC 0205
(-90HT) 3 7.0 g/ cm

.3 .6
0-.3 10 -14

1.5 3.9
0-2 16 -18

690 (100)
280 (41)

620 (90)
140 (20)

.5
18.5

36 HRC
20 HRB

ss-316L 6.6 g/cm3

* Metals Handbook 4340 tempered @ 1,000F - ASM International, Volume 1, ninth edition, p 426.

12

ADDITIONAL PM SHAPE TECHNOLOGY In addition to conventional press and sinter PM technology, there are a number of allied metalforming techniques that offer design engineers options and choices when designing components. Some of these techniques would be characterized as nonconventional PM applications. If a designer is trying to develop an application that has three axes of design freedom and employs metal powders, the design choice for relatively small parts and large volumes is metal injection molding. The process is analogous to plastic or ceramic injection molding and can produce metal components with exceptional dimensional tolerance capabilities, unique metallurgical properties and require no machining. In general, parts are small, less than 500 grams, but this is changing with the introduction of new binder materials and the deployment of larger presses and more efficient furnaces for debinding and sintering. The part shown in Figure IV is an instrumental

Figure IV sensor control valve for chemical and oil flow control. It was made from a 50-50 nickel iron alloy that enables a magnetic flux to be applied through the body of the assembly. It replaced a four-part assembly. While we have not discussed the magnetic characteristics and capabilities of PM, this component is an axial flux stator. This example, figure V, of PMs capabilities replaced

13

Figure V a laminated electrical steel assembly and enables the magnetic flux to move in three dimensions, not just two. Another unique shape for our industry is this titanium softball bat outer shell (Figure VI).

Figure VI This application was formed using cold isostatic pressing and is an excellent example of what can be achieved with a little ingenuity. The shell is subsequently hot isostatically pressed. The only secondary operations are surface conditioning and cutting to length. The shell has an ultimate tensile strength of 150,000 psi and 12 % elongation. Hot isostatic pressing is becoming more prevalent with higher volume applications on the near horizon due to faster cycling of HIP equipment. Very large, three thousand pound near net shape compacts are possible using HIP. In addition, to their size, HIPing is

14

being used with material systems such as titanium aluminides. Again demonstrating the ability of PM to enable cost effective fabrication of unusual alloy combinations. Spray forming is a process used to produce semi-finished mill products in the form of billets, tubes and sheet or plate. This is a sequential stage process consisting of liquid metal atomization, and droplet consolidation to produce a near net shape. The products typically have a close to fully dense and fine equiaxed grain structure. The mechanical properties meet or exceed those of ingot processed alloys. Metal matrix composites, the most popular being aluminum-silicon carbide particulate reinforced materials, are frequently being used in aerospace, sporting goods products and electronic thermal management component manufacture. The process employed is usually cold isostatic pressing followed by hot extrusion or forging to full density. The last PM forming technique I would like to discuss briefly is powder forging of metal powder. Generally, the practice is to manufacture a green compact called a preform, sinter it, and then restrike/forge the preform to the required final density. This process results in a product with wrought properties. FINAL COMMENTS The real advantage of PM is to cost effectively produce large volume, highly toleranced, metal components. The ongoing debate has always centered on properties, such as strength and size. As you can see from the above comments, PM is rapidly overcoming these modest objections as material selection and material characteristics are being engineered to specific applications and requirements. Flexibility and knowledge of process variables is the key for both the end-user and the component manufacturer. Non-conventional PM applications are effectively dealing with size constraints and metal injection molding can deal with any part geometry you can imagine. We, as an industry, see challenging new horizons that only require a little inspiration, ingenuity and persistence.

15