Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 1 of 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
to Mt. Gox computer servers and the exclusive right to certain intellectual property necessary for
LAW OFFICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

COINLAB, INC., a Delaware Corporation

NO. Plaintiff, v. MT. GOX KK, a Japanese corporation, and TIBANNE KK, a Japanese corporation. Defendants. COMES NOW, Plaintiff CoinLab, Inc. (CoinLab), by and through their undersigned attorneys, brings this action against the Defendants, Mt. Gox KK, a Japanese corporation (Mt. Gox), and Tibanne KK, a Japanese corporation (Tibanne). Plaintiff states and alleges as follows: COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

I.
1.

INTRODUCTION

CoinLab brings this suit against Mt. Gox to remedy breach of the parties

exclusive license agreement for the United States and Canada. Both parties are among the worlds largest providers of technology and services for the digital currency Bitcoin. In

November 2012, the parties entered into a contract under which Mt. Gox granted CoinLab access

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 1

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 2 of 12

1 2 3 4

CoinLab to provide digital currency exchange services to North American customers. CoinLab offered its credibility, market insights, relationships with established banks and investors, and intellectual property and agreed to manage and market the exchange services in North America. 2. Mt. Gox has willfully failed to perform its obligations under this contract. Mt.

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
County Washington. 5. On information and belief, Mt. Gox and Tibanne (collectively Defendants) are 3. claims. Gox has continued to market to customers in North America and has accepted business from customers there. Mt. Gox has also failed to provide CoinLab with account reconciliation data, server access, and other information promised in the agreement that is essential for CoinLab to market exchange services and service its customers as contemplated in the agreement. These breaches have caused CoinLab to lose customers and threaten to cause substantial damage to CoinLabs business. As a result, CoinLab brings this action for breach of contract and related

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Plaintiff CoinLab is a

resident of Delaware and Washington State. Defendants Mt. Gox and Tibanne are residents of Japan. This is an action for damages in excess of $75,000,000.00 excluding interest, attorneys fees and costs. 4. CoinLab is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in King

corporations organized under the laws of Japan with their principal places of business in Tokyo, Japan. 6. On or about November 22, 2012, Defendants and CoinLab entered into a fully

integrated Exclusive License Agreement for the USA & Canada agreement (the Agreement).
LAW OFFICES

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 2

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 3 of 12

1 2 3 4

A true and accurate copy of the Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 7. The Agreement provides that the Defendants irrevocably consent to the personal

jurisdiction of and venue in the state and federal courts located in King County, Washington with respect to any action, claim or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement.

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2009. Bitcoins are a currency that is not issued or directly overseen by any government, but that A. 9. The Bitcoin Market Bitcoin is the most successful digital currency in the world. Bitcoins were first 8. The Agreement provides that it shall be governed, construed and interpreted in

accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.

III. FACTS

described in a paper published on the Internet in 2008 and were introduced to the market in early

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
11. A company offering Bitcoin exchange services will trade fiat or sovereign is instead managed through a peer-to-peer network operating over the Internet. Bitcoins use complex cryptography to protect the security of the Bitcoin system and prevent counterfeiting. 10. When first introduced, a single Bitcoin was valued at less than one penny. The

value of a Bitcoin has increased substantially since introduction. At times a single Bitcoin has been valued as high as $266. Bitcoins may be used to purchase goods and services through a number of websites or from any merchant that accepts Bitcoins.

21 22 23 24 25 26
based currency such as U.S. dollars for Bitcoins and also trade Bitcoins for U.S. dollars or other currencies. The annualized exchange volume for Bitcoin exchanges has grown to over $12 billion/year as of April 2013. 12. While Bitcoins are not a traditional fiat based currency, they are subject to

regulation by United States Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

LAW OFFICES

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 3

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 4 of 12

1 2 3 4

13.

In March 2013, FinCEN issued regulatory guidance for exchanges dealing in

digital currency such as Bitcoins. B. CoinLab and Mt. Gox Provide Bitcoin Services. 14. The Defendants provide Bitcoin exchange services via the Internet. They operate

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
United States and has fully complied with FinCENs March 2013 guidance for digital currency services directly to customers in the United States and Canada. CoinLab has established relationships with banks in the United States that will allow CoinLab to operate an exchange in North America. Because of its relationships with these financial institutions and respected venture capitalists and because of its adherence to applicable regulatory frameworks, CoinLab has established a very positive reputation in the Bitcoin business community. 16. CoinLab is registered with FinCEN to provide Bitcoin exchange services in the an interactive website available at <https://mtgox.com/> (the the Mt. Gox website) which accepts orders for Bitcoin exchanges. Through the Mt. Gox website, users can exchange

currency for Bitcoins. Mt. Gox has been widely reported to be the largest operating Bitcoin exchange in the world. 15. CoinLab is engaged in the operation and development of Bitcoin software and

technology products, services and platforms. CoinLab is prepared to provide Bitcoin exchange

20 21 22 23 24 25 26
exchanges. C. The Agreement Provides CoinLab With Exclusive Rights. 17. On November 22, 2012 Mt. Gox and CoinLab entered into the Agreement to

service the Bitcoin exchange market in a mutually beneficial manner that provided for stability and liquidity in that market. 18. Mt. Gox has no established banking relationships in North America and is unable
LAW OFFICES

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 4

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 5 of 12

1 2 3 4

to process transactions through banks in the United States or Canada. Through the Agreement, Mt. Gox greatly increased its ability to service the North American market. 19. Through the Agreement, Mt. Gox was enriched through its relationship with

CoinLab and CoinLabs intellectual property, expertise, standing in the Bitcoin ecosystem, and

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
specified to be a material breach of the Agreement. States or Canada. 22. In consideration for this exclusive license and promise of cooperation, CoinLab relationships. 20. Pursuant to the Agreement, Defendants granted CoinLab an exclusive license in

the North American market to use the Defendants software and other intellectual property in providing digital currency exchange services (the Licensed Materials). 21. The Agreement further provides that Defendants shall not grant anyone else the

right to use the Licensed Materials to provide Bitcoin exchange services anywhere in the United

promised, among other things, to assume responsibility for managing and marketing the exchange services in the United States and Canada. CoinLab also offered Mt. Gox the ability to service North American customers in a manner that it could not otherwise achieve. 23. Failure to comply with the exclusivity provisions of the Agreement is expressly

20 21 22 23 24 25 26
D. The Defendants Have Breached The Exclusivity Provisions. 24. Defendants have breached the exclusivity provisions of the Agreement by directly

servicing customers in the United States and Canada since the Agreement took effect. 25. The Agreement provides that beach of the exclusivity provisions of the

Agreement alone provides for liquidated damages in the amount of $50,000,000.00 as a nonexclusive remedy. The liquidated damages clause was defined at the time of the Agreement
LAW OFFICES

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 5

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 6 of 12

1 2 3 4

because of the uncertain nature of the Bitcoin exchange market and likely underestimates the actual damages incurred by Bitcoin as a result of Mt. Goxs breach of the exclusivity provisions of the Agreement. 26. Defendants have, in email and other written exchanges, and in public statements

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
connections from CoinLabs computer network to Mt. Goxs computer network. required to cooperate with CoinLab to transfer North American customers, defined as CoinLab Customers in the Agreement, from Mt. Gox to CoinLab. 28. Mt. Gox has failed to cooperate in facilitating the timely and seamless transfer of to the press acknowledged that they have directly serviced customers in the United States and Canada since entering the Agreement. This conduct constitutes a breach of the Agreement, including the exclusivity provisions in the Agreement. E. The Defendants Have Breached Other Provisions Of The Agreement. 27. The Agreement further provides for a transition period whereby United States and

Canadian customers are transitioned from Mt. Gox to CoinLab by March 22, 2013. Mt. Gox is

CoinLab Customers to Coinlab since the Agreement took effect. 29. Among other things, Defendants agreed to provide necessary technology,

software, and know-how to CoinLab during the transition period and to establish promised

20 21 22 23 24 25 26
30. Defendants have breached their promises to provide necessary technology, software, and know-how to CoinLab and have refused or failed to establish promised connections from CoinLabs computer network to Mt. Goxs computer network. 31. In the Agreement, Mt. Gox promised to deliver all passwords, Yubikeys,

administrative logins and any other security information required for CoinLab to assume operation of the Bitcoin exchange services for customers in the United States and Canada if Mt.
LAW OFFICES

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 6

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 7 of 12

1 2 3 4

Gox has a service interruption or is otherwise unable to maintain its exchange. 32. Despite repeated requests to do so, Mt. Gox has failed to deliver all passwords,

Yubikeys, administrative logins and any other security information required so that CoinLab may assume operation of the Bitcoin exchange services for customers in the United States and

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
37. Pursuant to the Agreement, Mt. Gox agreed to deposit Bitcoin and other funds data pertaining to any and all accounts for customers in the United States and Canada. 35. The Agreement provides for a revenue share for customers in the United States Canada in case of a service interruption. 33. The Agreement requires that Mt. Gox shall make available to CoinLab on-

demand and read-only access to Mt. Gox's databases and other related records and data pertaining to any and all accounts for customers in the United States and Canada. 34. Despite repeated requests to do so, Mt. Gox has failed to make available to

CoinLab on-demand and read-only access to Mt. Gox's databases and other related records and

and Canada (defined as CoinLab Customers) at different levels, depending upon the date that the customer began using Defendants services to exchange Bitcoins. 36. Defendants have failed to comply with the revenue share requirements set forth in

the Agreement and timely remit funds due to Coinlab.

20 21 22 23 24 25 26
(however denominated) of CoinLab Customers in an account or accounts controlled by CoinLab (the "Liquidity Funds") in accordance with CoinLab's instructions on transaction types, timing of transactions and wire transfer or other deposit instructions. 38. CoinLab. 39. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Parties were required to reconcile revenue and
LAW OFFICES

Mt. Gox has failed to timely deposit Liquidity Funds in the manner instructed by

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 7

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 8 of 12

1 2 3 4

customer trade imbalances on a weekly or more frequent basis. 40. imbalances. 41. The Agreement provides that CoinLab shall, for a period of five (5) years Defendants have failed to timely reconcile revenue and customer trade

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 IV. COUNT I- BREACH OF CONTRACT 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

by B. directly servicing customers in the United States and Canada in violation of the
LAW OFFICES

following termination, receive trailing revenues for users in the United States or Canada that use the Mt. Gox website or otherwise are serviced by Defendants for purposes of operating a Bitcoin exchanges or other purposes. 42. CoinLab stood ready to perform its obligations under the Agreement at all times

and informed the Defendants of this fact. 43. At all times during the Agreement, CoinLab has complied with its representations

and warranties under the Agreement. 44. CoinLab has, at all times during the term of the Agreement, operated in

compliance with all applicable laws. 45. CoinLab has provided assurances of compliance with its representations and

warranties and reasonable course of action for compliance with potential future changes in regulatory requirements applicable to operation of a Bitcoin exchange.

46. 47.

Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein. Since November 22, 2012, the Agreement has been a valid contract between

CoinLab and Defendants. 48. For the reasons specified above, Defendants breached the Agreement, including

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 8

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 9 of 12

1 2 3 4
D. C.

Agreements exclusivity provisions; failing to cooperate in facilitating the timely and seamless transfer of CoinLab customers to CoinLab; failing to provide the necessary technology, software, and know-how to CoinLab and refusing to establish promised network connections; E. failing to deliver all passwords, Yubikeys, administrative logins and other required security information; F. failing to make available to CoinLab on-demand and read-only access to Mt. Goxs databases and other related records and data pertaining to accounts for customers in the United States and Canada; G. H. failing to timely comply with the Agreements revenue share requirements; failing to timely deposit Liquidity Funds in the manner instructed by CoinLab; and I. 49. failing to timely reconcile revenue and customer trade imbalances. As a result of Defendants breaches, Plaintiff has suffered actual damages in an

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
50. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1-50 as if fully set forth herein. Defendants owed Plaintiff a duty to cooperate with Plaintiff so that each party

amount equal to or exceeding $75,000,000.

V. COUNT VI- BEACH OF IMPLIED DUTY OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING

23 24 25 26
51. could obtain the full benefit of performance. 52. Defendants failed to so cooperate, including by
LAW OFFICES

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 9

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 10 of 12

1 2 3 4

A.

directly servicing customers in the United States and Canada in violation of the Agreements exclusivity provisions;

B.

failing to cooperate in facilitating the timely and seamless transfer of CoinLab customers to CoinLab;

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
damages in an amount equal to or exceeding $75,000,000. H. 53. F. G. customers in the United States and Canada; failing to timely comply with the Agreements revenue share requirements; failing to timely deposit Liquidity Funds in the manner instructed by CoinLab; and failing to timely reconcile revenue and customer trade imbalances. As a direct result of Defendants failure to cooperate, Plaintiff has suffered E. D. C. failing to provide the necessary technology, software, and know-how to CoinLab and refusing to establish promised network connections; failing to deliver all passwords, Yubikeys, administrative logins and other required security information; failing to make available to CoinLab on-demand and read-only access to Mt. Goxs databases and other related records and data pertaining to accounts for

20 21 22 23 24 25 26
asking Defendants to make available to CoinLab on-demand and read-only access to Mt. Goxs
LAW OFFICES

VI. COUNT VII - ACCOUNTING

54. 55. Defendants. 56. Plaintiff demanded an accounting from Defendants pursuant to the Agreement by Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1-54 as if fully set forth herein. The Agreement establishes a fiduciary relationship between Plaintiff and

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 10

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 11 of 12

1 2 3 4

databases and other related records and data pertaining to accounts for customers in the United States and Canada by demanding that Defendants timely comply with the Agreements revenue share requirements. 57. Defendants have refused to provide such an accounting. Defendants have also

5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A. Ordering Defendants to comply immediately with their obligations under the Agreement; failed to timely deposit Liquidity Funds in the manner instructed by CoinLab or to timely reconcile revenue and customer trade imbalances.

VII. RELIEF REQUESTED

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that this court enter judgment in their favor:

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
E. Granting such other relief as this Court deems just, necessary, and proper. Dated this 2nd day of May, 2013. BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND PLLC By: /s/ Roger M. Townsend Roger M. Townsend, WSBA No. 25525 Breskin Johnson & Townsend PLLC 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 2230 Seattle, WA 98101 [email protected] Phone: (206) 652-8660 Fax: (206) 652-8290
LAW OFFICES

B. Awarding Plaintiff damages in the amount to be established at trial; C. Ordering an accounting of all monies due Plaintiff from Defendants pursuant to the Agreement; D. Awarding Plaintiff all costs and expenses incurred by Plaintiff as a result of Defendants unlawful conduct, including reasonable attorneys fees, litigation expenses, and court costs; and

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 11

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX

Case 2:13-cv-00777 Document 1 Filed 05/02/13 Page 12 of 12

1
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

By: /s/ Edgar Sargent Edgar Sargent, WSBA No. 28283 Floyd Short, WSBA No. 21632 Lindsey Godfrey Eccles, WSBA No. 33566 Susman Godfrey LLP 1201 3rd Ave Ste 3800 Seattle, WA 98101-3087 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Phone: (206) 516-3895 Fax: (206) 516-3883 Attorneys for Plaintiff CoinLab

LAW OFFICES

BRESKIN JOHNSON & TOWNSEND

PLLC

COMPLAINT- 12

1111 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2230 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-4088 (206) 652-8660, (206) 652-8290 FAX