Intro To Clusters
Intro To Clusters
Intro To Clusters
Edward J. Feser Department of City & Regional Planning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Introduction to
Objectives
What are industry clusters? What is industry cluster policy? What are some techniques for conducting industry cluster analyses? What can you gain from industry cluster analysis? Resources and guides
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill 2
Productivity growth
Microeconomic foundations
Company operations & strategy Micro business environment
Internal
External
From Porter (May, 2000)
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Firm strategy, Firm strategy, structure and structure and rivalry rivalry
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
institutions:
Trading sectors
Supporting institutions
Education (univ, colleges) Training (ccs) R&D (univ, fed labs) Development agencies Regulatory agencies
Intermediate suppliers Capital good suppliers Producer services Consultants Contract R&D
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
which cluster concepts inform existing initiatives or serve as the basis for wholly new strategies.
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Policy implications
Output from analysis
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Public sector
Industry
Education Marketing Recycling services
Consumers
Resources management
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Another
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
10
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
11
Time
Geography
Linkage: Innovation, labor, inputs Geography: Localized, non-localized Time: Existing, declining, emerging or potential
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill 13
Linkage dimension
What binds the firms in the cluster together?
Value-chain clusters: Firms that are members of the
same extended value (product) chain
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
14
Geographic dimension
Are member firms co-located in specific regions?
Localized: Clusters in which firms are co-located in
specific regions of state (or regions that span state borders)
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
15
Time dimension
At what stage of development are identified clusters in?
Existing: Clusters with significant presence and exemplify
particular linkages that are the focus of study; usually presumes expansion expanding
Declining: Existing clusters that are declining rather than Emerging: Clusters that appear to gaining a significant
presence but havent achieved a critical mass yet
Advantages
Easy Inexpensive Detailed contextual info Easy, inexpensive Can supplement methods Only major source of data on interdependence in U.S. Comprehensive and detailed Key measure of interdependence Can be used to identify labor affinities Visualization aids interpretation and analysis Flexibility to collect ideal data; current
Pitfalls
Not generalizable No matter how much you believe, its still opinion Focus is on sectors, not clusters May be dated Industry definitions imperfect Neglects supporting institutions Data not available in U.S. (see OECD activities) Occupation rather than skills based; fairly aggregate Methods, software still limited Costly Difficult to implement properly
17
Specialization indicators (LQs) Input-output: Trade Input-output: Innovation Staffing patterns: Labor Graph theory/ network analysis Surveys
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Determines:
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
19
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
20
Identify value chain for a single sector by finding key first, second, third tier suppliers
If an intermediate goods industry, also find key buying sectors Regional input-output approximates local trading patterns inputNational input-output approximates potential trading patterns inputUse other methods to identify related sectors and supporting institutions
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
21
Detailed interindustry transactions data: For each sector, sales to and purchases from every other sector
Apply data reduction techniques (factor analysis, statistical cluster analysis, etc.)
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
22
Heavy manufacturing
Light manufacturing
Independent industries
Packaged foods Canning & bottling Feed products Dairy products Meat products Tobacco
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Loading indicates strength of linkage between sector and cluster Column labeled cluster ID indicates codes for other clusters in which sector is a member Secondary sectors are those only moderately tied to the cluster
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
25
Methods:
of 501 x 241 labor requirements matrix staffing patterns defined in 0/1 form
Judgement
Analysis of regional trends with labor cluster templates similar to top-down VC approach
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
26
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
27
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
28
Spatial distribution
Statewide study ! 7 regional studies ! GIS-based analysis
!
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
29
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
30
Vehicle manufacturing an NC
strength revealed by top-down cluster analysis
SIC 37, transportation equipment industry accounts for 2.5 percent of state value-added and 3 percent of employment The vehicle manufacturing cluster is the second-largest in the state Growth of the cluster is most pronounced in central and western parts of the state Pattern and nature of cluster growth is consistent with national southward shift of auto production
60%
Triangle Piedmont
40% 20% 0% -20%
Northeast
Western Carolinas
Area:
Transpark Southeast
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
31
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Metalworking
Southeast region
Triangle Region
Southeast Region
Length of line from origin indicates number of employees in given sector; Axis dimensions range from 0 (at center) to 3,000 at edge.
Axes are sectors that make up the cluster, ordered clockwise by the strength of the linkage between the sector and overall cluster.
33
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
Identify groups of industries (industry clusters) whose members a strong degree of potential interdependence and shared competitiveness Identify any emerging industries that could take advantage of existing up- and downstream industrial activity Identify supplier and purchasing sectors that might constitute viable development targets Focus on higher value, higher technology sectors
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
34
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
35
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
36
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
37
Size Breadth (sectors present in region) Specialization, current and trend Expansion (aggregate and share growth sectors) Depth (diversity, trend in diversity)
3. Identification of core regional industries 4. Reduced Set of regional industries with strong or emerging potential up- and/or downstream linkages
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
38
Strength of approach
The notion of a single set of clusters for a give region unreasonable except at the most aggregate level Provides a level of detail that can facilitate strategic planning Can serve as a framework for continuous monitoring
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
39
Summary
Summary thoughts
Think policy needs first Identify appropriate clustering dimension to focus on Are localized clusters what youre after? Existing, emerging, potential? Utilize existing studies (e.g., templates), at least as a start If you commission a study, demand the following:
Full and detailed disclosure of all methods and data An actual assessment of interdependence, not just specialization Follow-up interpretation and support
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
40
Resources
Available guides
Old and New Theories of Industry Clusters, by E. Feser. In Clusters and Regional Specialisation: On Geography, Technology, and Networks, edited by M. Steiner, Pion Ltd., 1998. Networks, (www.pion.co.uk/ep/errs/errs1st.html) Industry Clusters: a Methodology and Framework for Regional Development Policy in the U.S., by E. Development Bergman and E. Feser, Forthcoming in Cluster Analysis and Cluster Based Policy: New Perspectives and Rationale in Innovation Policymaking, edited by T. Roelandt and P. den Hertog. Paris: OECD, Policymaking, Hertog. 1999. National industry cluster templates: A framework for applied regional cluster analysis, by E. Feser and regional E. Bergman, Forthcoming Regional Studies, 1999. (Contains all data in this presentation.) Studies, Industry Clusters: An Internet Resource for Economic Developers, by J. LeVeen, 1998. Developers, (www.unc.edu/depts/dcrpweb/courses/261/leveen/index.html) Targeting North Carolina Manufacturing: Understanding the States Economy through Industrial Cluster States Analysis, by E. Bergman, E. Feser, and S. Sweeney, North Carolina Alliance for Competitive Analysis, Alliance Technologies, 1996. (Contains set of U.S. manufacturing value chains based on 1987 input-output chains inputaccounts.) Industrial Strength Strategies: Regional Business Clusters and Public Policy, by S. Rosenfeld, Aspen Public Policy, Institute, 1995. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, by M. Porter, Basic Books, 1990. Nations,
Copyright 2001 Prof. Edward Feser, Department of City & Regional Planning, UNC-Chapel Hill
41