Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3K views

    PNB Vs Judge Benito Se

    Uploaded by

    Shaheenah Midtimbang Abbas
    1) The case involved a dispute between PNB and Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery over sugar stocks covered by warehouse receipts. 2) While PNB was entitled to the sugar stocks as the endorsee of the receipts, Noah's Ark (as the warehouseman) refused to deliver the stocks until its storage fees and preservation expenses were paid based on its warehouseman's lien. 3) The Court ruled that under the Warehouse Receipts Law, a warehouseman has a lien on goods deposited and is not required to deliver goods until the lien is satisfied. Thus, PNB had to pay the storage fees and expenses before retrieving the sugar stocks.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    PNB Vs Judge Benito Se

    Uploaded by

    Shaheenah Midtimbang Abbas
    3K views1 page
    1) The case involved a dispute between PNB and Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery over sugar stocks covered by warehouse receipts. 2) While PNB was entitled to the sugar stocks as the endorsee of the receipts, Noah's Ark (as the warehouseman) refused to deliver the stocks until its storage fees and preservation expenses were paid based on its warehouseman's lien. 3) The Court ruled that under the Warehouse Receipts Law, a warehouseman has a lien on goods deposited and is not required to deliver goods until the lien is satisfied. Thus, PNB had to pay the storage fees and expenses before retrieving the sugar stocks.

    Original Title

    Pnb vs Judge Benito Se

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) The case involved a dispute between PNB and Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery over sugar stocks covered by warehouse receipts. 2) While PNB was entitled to the sugar stocks as the endorsee of the receipts, Noah's Ark (as the warehouseman) refused to deliver the stocks until its storage fees and preservation expenses were paid based on its warehouseman's lien. 3) The Court ruled that under the Warehouse Receipts Law, a warehouseman has a lien on goods deposited and is not required to deliver goods until the lien is satisfied. Thus, PNB had to pay the storage fees and expenses before retrieving the sugar stocks.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    3K views1 page

    PNB Vs Judge Benito Se

    Uploaded by

    Shaheenah Midtimbang Abbas
    1) The case involved a dispute between PNB and Noah's Ark Sugar Refinery over sugar stocks covered by warehouse receipts. 2) While PNB was entitled to the sugar stocks as the endorsee of the receipts, Noah's Ark (as the warehouseman) refused to deliver the stocks until its storage fees and preservation expenses were paid based on its warehouseman's lien. 3) The Court ruled that under the Warehouse Receipts Law, a warehouseman has a lien on goods deposited and is not required to deliver goods until the lien is satisfied. Thus, PNB had to pay the storage fees and expenses before retrieving the sugar stocks.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    case Digest on PNB v. Judge Benito C. Se, Jr.

    (256 SCRA 380) A prior judgment holding that a party is a warehouseman obligated to deliver sugar stocks covered by the warehouse receipts does not necessarily carry with it a denial of its lien over the same sugar stocks. Thus where the judgment creditor (in this case PNB) makes an unconditional presentment of warehouse receipts for delivery of sugar stocks against the warehouseman (Noahs Ark), it thereby admits the existence and validity of the terms, conditions and stipulations written on the face of the warehouse receipts, including the unqualified recognition of the payment of warehousemans lien for storage fees and preservation expenses. Thus, PNB may not retrieve the sugar stocks without paying the warehousemans lien. The warehouseman need not file a separate action to enforce payment of storage fees. He may enforce his lien before delivering the sugar stocks covered by the warehouse receipts. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, petitioner, vs. HON. PRES. JUDGE BENITO C. SE, JR., RTC, BR. 45, MANILA; NOAHS ARK SUGAR REFINERY; ALBERTO T. LOOYUKO, JIMMY T. GO and WILSON T. GO, respondents. G.R. No. 119231. April 18, 1996 FACTS: In accordance with Act No. 2137, the Warehouse Receipts Law, Noahs Ark Sugar Refinery issued on several dates, 5 Warehouse Receipts (Quedans). They were endorsed and negotiated to Ramos and Zoleta. They failed to pay their loans upon maturity. So, PNB wrote to Noahs Ark Sugar Refinery demanding delivery of the sugar stocks covered by the quedans endorsed to it by Zoleta and Ramos. Noahs Ark Sugar Refinery refused. So, PNB filed a complaint for Specific Performance with Damages and Application for Writ of Attachment. Respondent Judge Benito C. Se, Jr., in whose sala the case was raffled, denied the Application for Preliminary Attachment. HELD: Under the subject Warehouse Receipts provision, storage fees are chargeable. PNB is legally bound to stand by the express terms and conditions on the face of the Warehouse Receipts as to the payment of storage fees. Even in the absence of such a provision, law and equity dictate the payment of the warehousemans lien pursuant to Sections 27 and 31 of the Warehouse Receipts Law (R.A. 2137), to wit: SECTION 27. What claims are included in the warehousemans lien. Subject to the provisions of section thirty, a warehouseman shall have lien on goods deposited or on the proceeds thereof in his hands, for all lawful charges for storage and preservation of the goods; also for all lawful claims for money advanced, interest, insurance, transportation, labor, weighing coopering and other charges and expenses in relation to such goods; also for all reasonable charges and expenses for notice, and advertisement of sale, and for sale of the goods where default has been made in satisfying the warehousemans lien. SECTION 31. Warehouseman need not deliver until lien is satisfied. A warehouseman having a lien valid against the person demanding the goods may refuse to deliver the goods to him until the lien is satisfied. After being declared as the warehouseman, PRs cannot legally be deprived of their right to enforce their claim for warehousemans lien, for reasonable storage fees and preservation expenses. Pursuant to Section 31 which we quote earlier, the goods under storage may not be delivered until said lien is satisfied. Considering that PNB does not deny the existence, validity and genuineness of the Warehouse Receipts on which it anchors its claim for payment against PRs, it cannot disclaim liability for the payment of the storage fees stipulated therein. PNB is in estoppel in disclaiming liability for the payment of storage fees due the PRs as warehouseman while claiming to be entitled to the sugar stocks covered by the subject Warehouse Receipts on the basis of which it anchors its claim for payment or delivery of the sugar stocks. The unconditional presentment of the receipts by PNB for payment against PRs on the strength of the provisions of the Warehouse Receipts Law (R.A. 2137) carried with it the admission of the existence and validity of the terms, conditions and stipulations written on the face of the Warehouse Receipts, including the unqualified recognition of the payment of warehousemans lien for storage fees and preservation expenses. PNB may not now retrieve the sugar stocks without paying the lien due PRs as warehouseman. RULE: While the PNB is entitled to the stocks of sugar as the endorsee of the quedans, delivery to it shall be effected only upon payment of the storage fees. Imperative is the right of the warehouseman to demand payment of his lien at this juncture, because, in accordance with Section 29 of the Warehouse Receipts Law, the warehouseman loses his lien upon goods by surrendering possession thereof. In other words, the lien may be lost where the warehouseman surrenders the possession of the goods without requiring payment of his lien, because a warehousemans lien is possessory in nature. WHEREFORE, the petition should be, as it is, hereby dismissed for lack of merit.

    You might also like