Seminar Report On Nanotechnology
Seminar Report On Nanotechnology
Seminar Report On Nanotechnology
SEMINAR ON
NANOTE CHNOLOG Y
Guided By Submitted By
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INNTRODUCTION …………………………………………………….. 1
2. HISTORY OF NANOTECHNOLOGY ……………………………….. 2
3. NANOTECHNOLOGY TOOLS ………………………….. …………...3
3.1THE ADVANTAGES OF POSITIONAL CONTROL ….. ………….3
3.2 SELF ASSEMBLY …………………………………………………. 4
3.3 POSITIONAL DEVICES AND POSITIONAL CONTROLY
CONTROLLED REACTION ……………………………………… 4
3.4 STIFFNESS …………………………………………………………. 6
3.5 SCANNING TUNNELLING MICROSCOPE…………………….. 6
3.5.1 RECENT DEVELOPMENT IN NANOTECHNOLOGY
USING STM ……………………………………………… 7
4. NANOTECHNOLOGY SIZE CONCERNS …………………………… 7
MICROINFORMATION SEEKERS ……………………………7
QUANTAM UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE …………………… 8
5. TRADITONAL APPORACH “TOP-DOWN-APPORACH” ………… 8
THE NANOTECHNOLOGY “BOTTOM-UP-APPORACH” ..9
6. ACCOMPLISHMENT OF NANOTECHNOLOGY ………………… 10
ADVANCED ENGINEERING………………………………… 10
THE ASSEMBLER……………………………………………….10
SELF REPLICATION ………………………………………… 10
7. APPLICATIONS …………………………………………………………12
7.1 IMPROVED TRANSPORTATION…………………………….. 12
INTELLEGENCE CARS………………………………13
NANOCOMPOSITES………………………………………….. 13
ATOM COMPUTERS…………………………………………. 14
HIGH LEVEL STORAGE CAPACITY……………. 14
MOLECULAR ELECTORONICS……………………………. 15
MILLITARY APPLICATIONS………………………………. 15
SMART FURNITURE…………………………………………. 15
SOLAR ENERGY……………………………………………… 16
MEDICAL USES ……………………………………………. 16
1. Introduction
Other terms, such as molecular engineering or molecular manufacturing are also often
applied when describing this emerging technology. This technology does not yet
exist. But, scientists have recently gained the ability to observe and manipulate atoms
directly. However, this is only one small aspect of a growing array of techniques in
nanoscale science and technology. The ability to make commercial products may yet
be a few decades away.
The central thesis of nanotechnology is that almost any chemically stable structure
that is not specifically disallowed by the laws of physics can in fact be built.
Theoretical and computational models indicate that molecular manufacturing systems
are possible — that they do not violate existing physical law. These models also give
us a feel for what a molecular manufacturing system might look like. Melting pot of
science combining applications of physics, chemistry, biology, electronics and
computers. Today, scientists are devising numerous tools and techniques that will be
needed to transform nanotechnology from computer models into reality.
Matter is composed of small atoms that are closely bound together, making up the
molecular structure, which, in turn determines the density of the concerned material.
Since different factors such as molecular density, malleability, ductility and surface
tension come into play, nanosystems have to be designed in a cost effective manner
that overrides these conditions and helps to create machines capable of withstanding
the vagaries of the environment.
Let us take the case of metals. Metals, solids in particular, consist of atoms held
together by strong structural forces, which enable metals to withstand high
temperatures. Depending upon the exertion of force or heat, the molecular structure
bends in a particular fashion, thereby acquiring a definite space in the form of a lattice
structure. When the bonding is strong, the metal is able to withstand pressure. Else it
becomes brittle and finally breaks up. So, only the strongest, the hardest, the highest
melting point metals are worth considering as parts of nanomachines.
The trick is to manipulate atoms individually and place them exactly where needed, to
produce the desired structure. It is a challenge for the scientists to understand the size,
shape, strength, force, motion and other properties while designing the nano
machines. The idea of nanotechnology is therefore to master over the characteristics
of matter in an intelligent manner to develop highly efficient systems.
2. HISTORY OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
Any advanced research carries inherent risks but nanotechnology bears a special
burden. The field's bid for respectability is colored by the association of the word with
a cabal of futurist who foresee nano as a pathway to a techno-utopia: unparalleled
prosperity, pollution-free industry, even something resembling eternal life.
In 1986-five years after IBM researchers Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer invented
the scanning tunneling microscope, which garnered them the Nobel Prize-the book
Engines of Creation, by K. Eric Drexler, created a sensation for its depiction of
godlike control over matter. The book describes self-replicating nanomachines that
could produce virtually any material good, while reversing global warming, curing
disease and dramatically extending life spans. Scientists with tenured faculty positions
and NSF grants ridiculed these visions, noting that their fundamental improbability
made them an absurd projection of what the future holds.
But the visionary scent that has surrounded nanotechnology ever since may provide
some unforeseen benefits. To many nonscientists, Drexler's projections for
nanotechnology straddled the border between science and fiction in a compelling way.
Talk of cell- repair machines that would eliminate aging as we know it and of home
food- growing machines that could produce victuals without killing anything helped to
create a fascination with the small that genuine scientists, consciously or not, would
later use to draw attention to their work on more mundane but eminently more real
projects. Certainly labeling a research proposal "nanotechnology" has a more alluring
ring than calling it "applied mesoscale materials science."
Less directly, Drexler's work may actually draw people into science. His imaginings
have inspired a rich vein of science- fiction literature . As a subgenre of science
fiction-rather than a literal prediction of the future-books about Drexlerian
nanotechnology may serve the same functio n as Star Trek does in stimulating a
teenager's interest in space, a passion that sometimes leads to a career in aeronautics
or astrophysics.
The danger comes when intelligent people take Drexler's predictions at face value.
Drexlerian nanotechnology drew renewed publicity last year when a morose Bill Joy,
the chief scientist of Sun Microsystems, worried in the magazine Wired about the
implications of nanorobots that could multiply uncontrollably. A spreading mass of
self-replicating robots-what Drexler has labeled "gray goo"-could pose enough of a
threat to society, he mused, that we should consider stopping development of
nanotechnology. But that suggestion diverts attention from the real nano goo:
chemical and biological weapons.
Among real chemists and materials scientists who have now become
nanotechnologists, Drexler's predictions have assumed a certain quaintness; science is
nowhere near to being able to produce nanoscopic machines that can help revive
frozen brains from suspended animation. (Essays by Drexler and his critics, including
Nobel Prize winner Richard E. Smalley, appear in this issue.) Zyvex, a company
started by a software magnate enticed by Drexlerian nanotechnology, has recognized
how difficult it will be to create robots at the nanometer scale; the company is now
dabbling with much larger micromechanical elements, which Drexler has disparaged
in his books.
3. NANOTECHNOLOGY TOOLS
What would it mean if we could inexpensively make things with every atom in the
right place? For starters, we could continue the revolution in computer hardware right
down to molecular gates and wires -- something that today's lithographic methods
(used to make computer chips) could never hope to do. We could inexpensively make
very strong and very light materials: shatterproof diamond in precisely the shapes we
want, by the ton, and over fifty times lighter than steel of the same strength. We could
make a Cadillac that weighed fifty kilograms, or a full-sized sofa you could pick up
with one hand. We could make surgical instruments of such precision and deftness
that they could operate on the cells and even molecules from which we are made --
something well beyond today's medical technology. The list goes on -- almost any
manufactured product could be improved, often by orders of magnitude.
At the molecular scale, the idea of holding and positioning molecules is new and
almost shocking. However, as long ago as 1959 Richard Feynman, the Nobel prize
winning physicist, said that nothing in the laws of physics prevented us from
arranging atoms the way we want: "...it is something, in principle, that can be done;
but in practice, it has not been done because we are too big."
Before discussing the advantages of positional control at the molecular scale, it's
helpful to look at some of the methods that have been developed by chemists --
methods that don't use positional control, but still let chemists synthesize a
remarkably wide range of molecules and molecular structures.
Many viruses use this approach to make more viruses -- if you stir the parts of the T4
bacteriophage together in a test tube, they will self assemble into fully functional
viruses.
they'd stick together when we didn't want them to stick together and form messy blobs
instead of precise molecular machines.
We can avoid this problem if we can hold and position the parts. Even though the
molecular parts that are used to make diamond are both randomly and very sticky
(more technically, the barriers to bond formation are low and the resulting covalent
bonds are quite strong), if we can position them we can prevent them from bumping
into each other in the wrong way. When two sticky parts do come into contact with
each other, they'll do so in the right orientation because we're holding them in the
right orientation. In short, positional control at the molecular scale should let us make
things which would be difficult or impossible to make without it. If we are to position
molecular parts we must develop the molecular equivalent of "arms" and "hands."
We'll need to learn what it means to "pick up" such parts and "snap them together."
We'll have to understand the precise chemical reactions that such a device would use.
One of the first questions we'll need to answer is: what does a molecular-scale
positional device look like? Current proposals are similar to macroscopic robotic
devices but on a much smaller scale. The illustrations ( Fig 1 & 2 ) show a design for
a molecular-scale robotic arm proposed by Eric Drexler, a pioneering researcher in
the field. Only 100 nanometers high and 30 nanometers in diameter, this rather squat
design has a few million atoms and roughly a hundred moving parts. It uses no
lubricants, for at this scale a lubricant molecule is more like a piece of grit. Instead,
the bearings are "run dry" as described in the following paragraph.
Running bearings dry should work both because the diamond surface is very slippery
and because we can make the surface very smooth -- so smooth that there wouldn't
even be molecular-sized asperities or imperfections that might catch or grind against
each other. Computer models support our intuition: analysis of the bearings shown
here using computational chemistry programs shows they should rotate easily.
Fig. 2 Cross section of a stiff manipulator arm showing its range of motion
3.4 STIFFNESS
The critical property we need here is stiffness. Stiffness is a measure of how far
something moves when you push on it. If it moves a lot when you push on it a little,
it's not very stiff. If it doesn't budge when you push hard, it's very stiff.
The STM is a device that can position a tip to atomic precision near a surface and can
move it around. The scanning tunneling microscope is conceptually quite simple. It
uses a sharp, electrically conductive needle to scan a surface. The position of the tip
of the needle is controlled to within 0.1 angstrom (less than the radius of a hydrogen
atom) using a voltage-controlled piezoelectric drive. When the tip is within a few
angstroms of the surface and a small voltage is applied to the needle, a tunneling
current flows from the tip to the surface. This tunneling current is then detected and
amplified, and can be used to map the shape of the surface, such as a blind man
tapping in front of him with his cane, we can tell that the tip is approaching the
surface and so can "feel" the outlines of the surface in front of us.
Many different types of physical interactions with the surface are used to detect its
presence. Some scanning tunneling microscopes literally push on the surface -- and
note how hard the surface pushes back. Others connect the surface and probe to a
voltage source, and measure the current flow when the probe gets close to the surface.
A host of other probe-surface interactions can be measured, and are used to make
different types of STMs. But in all of them, the basic idea is the same: when the sharp
tip of the probe approaches the surface a signal is generated -- a signal which lets us
map out the surface being probed.
The STM cannot only map a surface; in many cases the probe-surface interaction
changes the surface as well. This has already been used experimentally to spell out
molecular words, and the obvious opportunities to modify the surface in a controlled
way are being investigated both experimentally and theoretically.
In the new work, the surface is atomically smooth graphite with a drop of dimethyl-
phthalate (a liquid) on its surface. (The type of organic liquid does not seem critical;
many other compounds have been used.) The needle is electrochemically- etched
tungsten, and is immersed in the liquid. Not only can the graphite surface be imaged
in the normal way, but also a voltage pulse applied to the needle (3.7 volts for 100
nanoseconds) can 'pin' one of the organic molecules to the surface, where it can be
viewed in the normal fashion. A second voltage pulse applied at the same location can
remove the pinned molecule (though it often randomly pins other molecules in an as-
yet uncontrollable way). In some cases, the voltage pulse will remove only part of the
pinned molecule, leaving behind a molecularly altered fragment.
A few big STMs making a few molecular structures won't let us make much --
certainly not tons of precisely structured shatterproof diamond. We'll need vast
numbers of very small positional devices operating in parallel. Unfortunately, as we
make our positional devices smaller and smaller, they will be more and more subject
to thermal noise. To make something that's both small and stiff is more challenging. It
helps to get the stiffest material you can find. Diamond, as usual, is stiffer than almost
anything else and is an excellent material from which to make a very small, very stiff
positional device. Theoretical analysis gives firm support to the idea that positional
devices in the 100 nanometer size range able to position their tips to within a small
fraction of an atomic diameter in the face of thermal noise at room temperature should
be feasible. Trillions of such devices would occupy little more than a few cubic
millimeters (a speck slightly larger than a pinhead).
chips. These elements are embedded in the mainframe of the system for carrying out
the bigger task. As the elements are capable of carrying out var ying tasks, they are
usually reffered to as ‗smart matter‘.
Material atomically
Controlled movement
"perfect"(each atom
Science/Technology of
in a designed
atoms in 3D space?
location)?
It may be pointed out that making an organic compound using traditional synthetic
chemistry is not an example of nanotechnology. By contrast, the use of self-assembly
techniques to make small molecular components coalesce or unite into a macro-cyclic
molecule having multi- nanometer dimensions can legitimately be considered
nanotechnology.
Today, electronic devices, sensors, motors, and many other items are fabricated using
a "top down" approach. Today's computer chips are made using photolithography, a
process that uses light and chemicals to etch lines into silicon wafers. The process
requires vacuum chambers, powerful lasers and hazardous chemicals, which is why
state-of-the-art chip factories tend to be billion-dollar facilities. As device features
have become finer, the number of devices that can be crammed onto a chip has been
doubling every 18 to 24 months.
But chipmakers will be hard-pressed to extend this miniaturization trend for another
decade. As device features shrink into the low-nanometer range, the chips will not be
able to perform as reliably. Moreover, the cost of constructing new fabrication lines
for each new generation of chips will become prohibitive.
6 ACCOMPLISHMENT OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
6.1 ADVANCED ENGINEERING
The basic properties of atoms and molecules are already well understood, though
routine research will be part of the development process. The existence of molecular
machines in nature shows that machines at that scale are physically possible. No new
fundamental science is needed; nanotechnology will be an engineering advance. This
makes it foreseeable, unlike future scientific discoveries.
Positional control combined with appropriate molecular tools should let us build a
truly staggering range of molecular structures -- but a few molecular devices built at
The first serious analysis of self replicating systems was by von Neumann in the
1940's. He carried out a detailed analysis of one such system in a theoretical cellular
automata model . In von Neumann's cellular automata model he used a universal
computer for control and a "universal constructor" to build more automata. The
"universal constructor" was a robotic arm that, under computer control, could move in
two dimensions and alter the state of the cell at the tip of its arm. By sweeping
systematically back and forth, the arm could "build" any structure that the computer
instructed it to. In his three-dimensional "kinematic" model, von Neumann retained
the idea of a positional device (now able to position in three dimensions rather than
two) and a computer to control it.
A NASA study in 1980 extended the general conclusions of von Neumann and
concluded that a fully automated lunar mining and manufacturing operation, able to
extend itself using its own mining and manufacturing capabilities, would be feasible
and could be built given a multi-billion dollar budget and a few decades of work.
The complexity of a self replicating system need not be excessive. In this co ntext the
complexity is just the size, in bytes, of a "recipe" that fully describes how to make the
system. The complexity of an assembler needn't be beyond the complexity that can be
dealt with by today's engineering capabilities. As shown in the following table, there
are several self replicating systems whose complexity is well within current
What is the "complexity" of a living system? We'll take this to mean the number of
bytes in the DNA "blueprints." As each base pair in DNA can be one of four
possibilities, it encodes two bits. One byte (8 bits) can be encoded in four base pairs.
This means we count the number of base pairs in the DNA and divide by four to get
the number of bytes in the "blueprints." For Mycoplasma genitalia, which has 580,070
base pairs, this results in 145,017.5 bytes. For humans, with roughly 3.2 billion base
pairs, this results in 800 million bytes. (We're using the haploid base pair count: each
cell in your body has DNA from your mother and DNA from your father -- but much
of this is similar. We're counting only the DNA from one parent). The complexity and
sophistication of most living systems goes well beyond anything we might need just
to achieve low cost manufacturing.
The complexity of the internet worm is just an estimate of the number of bytes in its C
program. Because the environment in which it operates is highly structured and
provides relatively easy access to complex and sophisticated software, it could be
argued that its complexity might be much less than the complexity of a system that
operated in a "simple" environment. We'll leave it in our table anyway, as it's an
interesting data point. This argument is less applicable to von Neumann's universal
constructor which operates in a simple environment: just a large two-dimensional
checkerboard with a finite number of states at each square. Its complexity is an
estimate of the number of bytes needed to describe the constructor. The complexity of
the NASA Lunar Manufacturing Facility was estimated in the NASA study.
Today, most airplanes are made from metal despite the fact that diamond has a
strength-to-weight ratio over 50 times that of aerospace aluminum. Diamond
is expensive, we can't make it in the shapes we want, and it shatters.
Nanotechnology will let us inexpensively make shatterproo f diamond (with a
structure that might resemble diamond fibers) in exactly the shapes we want.
For Download Visit http://www.nectarkunj.byethost14.com/
15
NANOTECHNOLOGY
This would let us make a Boeing 747 whose unloaded weight was 50 times
lighter but just as strong.
Today, travel in space is very expensive and reserved for a n elite few.
Nanotechnology will dramatically reduce the costs and increase the
capabilities of space ships and space flight. The strength-to-weight ratio and
the cost of components are absolutely critical to the performance and economy
of space ships: with nanotechnology, both of these parameters will be
improved. Beyond inexpensively providing remarkably light and strong
materials for space ships, nanotechnology will also provide extremely
powerful computers with which to guide both those ships and a wide range of
other activities in space.
In a few decades your car will know the freeway conditions on your favorite route to
home. The GPS installed would take the easiest route possible and the computer
system would calculate the instantaneous speed and history of every vehicle between
you and your destination. The car could be set on auto mode allowing you to read
your favorite novel. On the auto mode, the car would be smart enough to avoid any
collisions with other vehicles and take safety measures if you happen to sleep off.
You won‘t have to hunt for the parking space. The car would find and reserve a
parking space for you. Many prototypes of such cars have been tested in Europe, the
US and Japan.
7.2 NANOCOMPOSITES
A plastic nanocomposite is being used for "step assists" in the GM Safari and Astro
Vans. It is scratch-resistant, lightweight, and rustproof, and generates improvements
in strength and reductions in weight, which lead to fuel savings and increased
longevity. And in 2001, Toyota started using nanocomposites in a bumper that makes
it 60% lighter and twice as resistant to denting and scratching impact: Will likely be
used on other GM and Toyota models soon, and in other areas of their vehicles, as
well as the other auto manufactures, lowering weight, increasing mileage, and
creating longer-lasting autos. Likely to impact repair shops (fewer repairs needed) and
auto insurance companies (fewer claims). Will also likely soon be seen everywhere
weight, weatherproofing, durability, and strength are important factors. Expect
NASA, the ESA, and other space- faring organizations to take a serious look, soon,
which will eventually result in lower lift costs, which will result in more material
being lifted into space.
The first application that comes to mind is a very high -density memory. The
minimum spot-size demonstrated in the new work is 10 angstroms, though a
somewhat larger size might be required in practice. If we assume that a single bit can
be read or written into a 10 angstrom square, then a one square centimeter surface can
hold 1014 bits. That's one hundred terabytes. The 100 nanosecond pulse time sets a 10-
megabit/second maximum write rate, though this might be degraded for other reasons.
At this rate, it would take several months to a year of constant writing to fill a one
square centimeter memory. Access times will probably be limited by the time needed
to move the needle--which might be a significant fraction of a second to travel one
centimeter--giving access times similar to those on current disk drives. The
manufacturing cost of such a system is unclear, but the basic components do not seem
unduly expensive. It seems safe to predict that someone in the not-too-distant future is
going to build a low-cost very large capacity secondary storage device (disk
replacement) based on this technology.
The larger implication of this work, however, is that it may put us on the threshold of
controlled molecular manipulation. The great virtue of this technique is that we need
not imagine it at all--it is real and is being pursued in Bell Laboratory and at IBM
Almaden.
Today, "smart" weapons are fairly big -- we have the "smart bomb" but not the
"smart bullet". In the future, even weapons as small as a single bullet co ld
pack more computer power than the largest supercomputer in existence toda y,
allowing them to perform real time image analysis of their surroundings and
communicate with weapons tracking systems to acquire and navigate to targets
with greater precision and control.
We'll also be able to build weapons both inexpensively and muc h more
rapidly, at the same time taking full advantage of the remarkable materials
properties of diamond. Rapid and inexpensive manufacture of great quantities
of stronger more precise weapons guided by massively increased
computational power will alter the way we fight wars. Changes of this
magnitude could destabilize existing power structures in unpredictable ways.
Military applications of nanotechnology raise a number of concerns that
prudence suggests we begin to investigate before, rather than after, we develop
this new technology.
The concepts of adaptive furniture have caught the fancy of many designers
who value the aesthetic design and the overall getup and feel of
furniture. Smart furniture of the future could be fitted with microchips that
help the furniture concerned to behave and changed accordingly depending
upon the posture of the person. Nanotechnology would be the enabler of
adaptive structures in furniture
.
Today we have furniture that adapts to the human body, but it does so in an
awkward and incomplete manner. A chair adapts because it is a hinge
contraption that grudgingly bends and extends in a few places to suit the
preferred position.
There are advertisements of the furniture giving a massage. But in fact it only
vibrates. So what we get in reality is a momentarily relief and in long run a
problem like lower back pain.
Nanotechnology will cut costs both of the solar cells and the equipment
needed to deploy them, making solar power economical. In this application we
need not make new or technically superior solar cells: making inexpensively
what we already know how to make expensively would move solar power into
the mainstream.
On the medical front, doctors claim that around the year 2020 there would be
no unanticipated illness. Chronic sensor implants would monitor almost every
major circulatory system in the human body and provide you with early
warning of any minor change in the body system, such as common cold and
even go to the extent of saving life by detecting the harmful cancerous
cells/tumors and eradicating them completely. Nanotech visionaries have
much more ambitious notion like designing a device that cruises the human
blood stream seeks out cholesterol deposit on vessel walls and dissembles
them. These nanobots could chip pluck from arteries, gang up on bacteria and
virus, scour toxins from the blood stream, repair broken blood vessels and
dozens of jobs doctors haven‘t dreamed of yet.
Rather than clear-cutting forests to make paper, we'd have assemblers synthesizing
paper. Rather than using oil for energy, we'd have molecule-sized solar cells mixed
into road pavement. With such solar nanocells, a sunny patch of pavement a few
hundred square miles could generate enough energy for the entire United States.
Famine would be obliterated, as food could be synthesized easily and cheaply with a
microwave-sized nanobox that pulls the raw materials (mostly carbon) from the air or
the soil. And by using nanobots as cleaning machines that break down pollutants, we
would be able to counteract the damage we've done to the earth since the industrial
revolution.
We have used the air safety bags in cars that open up on the impact of collision, there
by saving by occupants of the car. But for the motorcyclists it is like reading with
death, even a little accelerated slight turn on a slimy surface could be the end of the
road for them.
Motorcycle accidents cause severe damage to the head, neck, spine, torso and the
internal organs of the riders. Providing a ‗cushion effect‘ to these areas may reduce
the level of injury. This can be done using the air bags.
In order to increase safety of two wheeler riders Italian firms in collaboration with an
Israel company have developed a jacket in the form of air bag called D-air system. It
can inflate in 30 milliseconds and can maintain pressure for 20 seconds.
And it's not just building new things. Nanites can rearrange what is already around.
One quite exciting possibility is pollution control.
For example, nanites could be designed to harvest heavy metals and toxic chemicals
from polluted sites.
They could be seeded into the upper atmosphere to repair the holes in the ozone layer
And since they can make just about anything, large unsightly factories and
manufacturing plants may well be made obsolete.
The engineering community needs to redefine the role of engineering from analysis,
design and manufacturing mainly at the macro- and micro- scales towards the
‗nanoscale engineering‘; improve education and training of engineers to better
understand phenomena and processes from the atomic, molecular and macromolecular
levels; and address problem-driven and interdisciplinary nanotechnology R&D where
engineering plays an important role.
9. HOW LONG?
The single most frequently asked question about nanotechnology is: How long? How
long before it will let us make molecular computers? How long before inexpensive
solar cells let us use clean solar power instead of oil, coal, a nd nuclear fuel? How long
before we can explore space at a reasonable cost?
From relays to vacuum tubes to transistors to integrated circuits to Very Large Scale
Integrated circuits (VLSI) we have seen steady declines in the size and cost of logic
elements and steady increases in their performance. 7
Much worse, though, is that such trends imply that there is some ordained
schedule -- that nanotechnology will appear regardless of what we do or don't
do. Nothing could be further from the truth. How long it takes to develop this
technology depends very much on what we do. If we pursue it systematically,
it will happen sooner. If we ignore it, or simply hope that someone will
stumble over it, it will take much longer. And by using theoretical,
computational and experimental approaches together, we can reach the goal
more quickly and reliably than by using any single approach alone.
Like the first human landing on the moon, the Manhattan project, or the development
of the modern computer, the development of molecular manufacturing will require the
coordinated efforts of many people for many years. How long will it take? A lot
depends on when we start.
The effect of nanotechnology on the health, wealth, and lives of people could be at
least as significant as the combined influences of microelectronics, medical imaging,
computer-aided engineering, and man- made polymers developed in this century.
IndiaNano Nanotechnology Initiative establishes Grand Challenges -- potential
breakthroughs that if one day realized could provide major, broad-based economic
benefits to India, as well as improve the quality of life for its citizens dramatically.
Examples of these breakthroughs include: Containing the entire contents of the
Library of the parliament in a device the size of a sugar cube; Making materials and
products from the bottom-up, that is, by building them up from atoms and molecules.
Of course, all great advances come with associated problems. Before we get all these
advantages from nanotechnology, we have to think about how we might solve these
Nanotechnology will not solve our problems!
How can you get millions of molecules to arrange themselves into exact
arrangements?
How do you test the billion molecule electronic circuit?
Nanoscale computing is amorphous
The ―price of programmability‖
13. Conclusion
The work in nanotechnology is being carried out not just on the materials of the
future, but also the tools that will allow us to use these ingredients to create products.
Experimental work has already resulted in the production of scanning tunneling
microscope, molecular tweezers, and logic devices. Theoretical work in the
construction of nano-computers is progressing as well. Taking all of this into account,
it is clear that the technology is feasible.
14. REFERENCES
www.zyvex.com
electronics for you
www.foresight.org
www.nanoelectronicsplanet.com
www.nanotechnology.com
information technology – june 2002