Ing - Type
Ing - Type
Ing - Type
EMULSION TYPE
JOEL H. HILDEBRAXD
Department o j Chemzstry, Unaverszty of Calzfornza, Berkeley, Calzjornza
Recezved June 7, 1941
Although the factors influencing emulsion type have long been the sub-
jects of discussion, it can hardly be said even now that the apparent con-
flicts have been settled. The situation indicates, I believe, that no single
theory of emulsion type will suffice, in view of the various factors operating
and the wide differences in the emulsifying agents used. Three of these
theories assume that the type is determined hy a natural direction of
curvature of the interfacial film of emulsifying. One, the “oriented-wedge
theory” (1, 3, 4), applies to monomolecular films, another applies to solid
skins, and a third to solid particles (5). In each of these cases there is
reason to believe that curvature in one direction yields a lower energy
than curvature in the other; hence this direction is undoubtedly one factor
in determining which liquid shall be the enclosed phase.
There are two reasons, however, for seeking additional factors. One is
that the force tending to produce curvature is extremely small in view of
the thinness of the film. A second and far stronger objection is that there
is no mechanism whereby droplets of oils as insoluble in water as those
ordinarily used can assume the theoretical equilibrium size. A droplet
that is too big cannot spontaneously shrink; it can only become bigger by
coalescence, an irreversible process. I wiqh to suggest, therefore, that
attention be focused on the processes of emulsification and coalescence,
rather than upon equilibrium considerations involved in curvature of
minimum energy. The more or less violent agitation used to form an
emulsion must give a t the outset globules of both kinds, so that between
them we have both kinds of film, some of water, some of oil.
1304 JOEL H . HILDEBRAND
The various factors which contribute to the stability of one type of emul-
sion rather than the inverse type are supplemental rather than rival. The
direction of film curvature for minimum energy has probably been over-
emphasized a t the expense of the more mechanical forces operating during
the emulsification process. The rupture of a film separating two droplets
can be resisted by a larger rise in interfacial tension a t the threatened point
if the reserve emulsifying agent is dissolved in the liquid forming the film,
i.e., the external phase, owing to the lower rate of adsorption in that case.
REFERENCES
(1) FINKLE, DRAPER,
AND HILDEBR.4ND: J. Am. Chem. SOC. 46,2780 (19%).
(2) GRIFFIN:J. Am. Chem. SOC.46, 1648 (1923).
(3) HARKINB, AND CLARK:J. Am. Chem. SOC.
DAVIS, 39, 354,541 (1917).
(4) LANGMUIR: Chem. Met. Eng. 16,468 (1916);J Am. Chem. SOC.39, 1848 (1917).
(5) SCARLETT, MORGAN, AND HILDEBRAND: J. Phys. Chem. 31, 1566 (1927).