Eployee Welfare Measures Project Report
Eployee Welfare Measures Project Report
Eployee Welfare Measures Project Report
INTRODUCTION:
The term is derived from the French word “WELFARE”. The of this
French word is “well being or happiness or prosperity of individuals’’
ARTHUR JAMES TODD {1933} point welfare is “Anything” done for the
comfort and improvement, intellectual and social of the employees over and above
the wage paid, which is not necessary for the industry.
PROUD E.S. defines the welfare work as voluntary efforts on the part of
employers to improve the existing industrial system the condition of employment
in their own factories.
Employee welfare enables workers to have richer and more satisfying life. It
raises the standard of living of workers by indirectly reducing the burden on
their pocket. Welfare measures improve the physical and physiological health
Of the employees, which in turn enhance their efficiency and productivity.
C.B.Memoria (1966) points out the following aims of Labour Welfare Work.
1. It is partly humanistic to enable the workers to enjoy a fuller and richer
life.
2. It is partly economic to improve the efficiency of the workers, to increase
its availability where it is scarce and keep him contended so as to minimize the
inducement to form or join unions and to resort to strikes.
In general, welfare measure are aimed at enabled the welfare to lead a more
satisfactory life.
The history of Labour Welfare in India started with the abolition of slavery
system in 1833. Based on the recommendation of the International Labour
Conference in 1870 held in Berlin, the Government of India modified the factories
act in 1881.
The study team study appointment by the Government of India in 1959 to examine
Labour Welfare activities then existing divided the entire of these activities in to
THREE groups viz.,
These principles also refer to taking of the steps to secure the participation
of workers in the management of industries. Article 45 also deals with provision
of free and compulsory education for children, which impliedly includes those of
workers.
Company profile:
Our Vision
Our Mission
Our Values
• Integrity
• Commitment
• Passion
• Seamlessness
• Speed
Grasim Industries Limited is the brightest feather in the cap of the Aditya Birla Group which
one of the biggest private sector companies in India.
Grasim Industries was set up with the sole purpose of textiles manufacturing in the year
1948 but the company has entered into several commercial activities at a steady rate. Grasim
Industries is numero uno in many of the sectors where it operates.
In order to enter the Indian cement industry, Grasim Industries took over a big chunk of the total
shares and also the control of the management of the UltraTech Cement Limited, which was
merged with the Larsen and Toubro Cement Company in 2004. Within a very short span of time,
the company was able to penetrate a big portion of the market in India. Grasim industries,
including its subsidiaries, operates 7 split grinding units, 11 composite plants, 4 bulk terminals,
and 10 ready mix concrete units.
• Viscose staple fiber: This division of the Aditya Birla Group is the biggest producer of
viscose staple fiber worldwide. It fulfills the demand of the domestic market for the
viscose staple fiber.
• Cement: This division is ranked 11th in the international arena and 7th in Asia. It is
further divided into two grey cement and white cement.
Rajashree Cement
Vikram Cement
Grasim Cement
Aditya Cement
• Grasim Industries Limited, a flagship company of the Aditya Birla Group, ranks among
India's largest private sector companies, with consolidated net turnover of Rs.184 billion
and a consolidated net profit of Rs.22 billion (FY2009).
• The Aditya Birla Group is the world’s largest producer of VSF, commanding a 23 per
cent global market share. Grasim, with an aggregate capacity of 333,975 tpa has a global
market share of 12 per cent. It is also the second largest producer of caustic soda (which
is used in the production of VSF) in India.
• In cement, Grasim along with its subsidiary UltraTech Cement Ltd. has a capacity of 45.7
million tpa as on 30 June 2009 and is a leading cement player in India. In July 2004,
Grasim acquired a majority stake and management control in UltraTech Cement Limited.
One of the largest of its kind in the cement sector, this acquisition catapulted the Aditya
Birla Group to the top of the league in India.
Cement
Grasim has grown to become a leading cement player in India.
chemicals
Grasim has India's second largest caustic soda unit
Textiles
Grasim has strong nation-wide retail network and also caters to international fashion
houses in USA and UK.
Textile
Aditya Birla Group operates over 40 companies in 12 countries across 4 continents. Grasim is
one of its flagship companies and It is the world’s second largest producer of Viscose Rayon
Fiber with about 21% market share. Textile and related products contributes to 15% of the group
turnover.
Global footsteps
Indo-Thai Synthetics Company Ltd was incorporated in 1969 in Thailand, started operations in
1970; this was Aditya Birla Group’s first foray into international venture. Aditya Birla Group
incorporated P.T. Elegant Textiles in 1973 in Indonesia. Thai Rayon incorporated in 1974, this
was the second company in Thailand, operating in Viscose Rayon Staple Fiber. Century Textiles
Co. Ltd. is taken over by Aditya Birla Group in 1974; this company is a weaving and dyeing
plant manufacturing and exporting variety of synthetic fabrics. PT Sunrise Bumi Textiles
incorporated in 1979, it produces yarn exported over 30 countries in 6 continents. P.T Indo
Bharat Rayon incorporated in 1980 produces Viscose Staple Fiber in Indonesia to become a
dominant player in the domestic market as well as export markets. Thai Polyphosphates and
Chemicals was started in 1984 in Thailand to produce Sodium Phosphates, presently merged
with Thai Epoxy and Allied Products Company Limited (1992), Thai Sulphites and Chemicals
Company Limited (1995) to form Aditya Birla Chemicals Ltd. This company supplies to sectors
such as food, textiles, electrical and electronics, composites, leather, plastics and automobiles.
PT Indo Liberty Textiles was incorporated in 1995 to manufacture synthetic spun yarn.
In 2004, the Staple Fibre Division of Grasim Industries Ltd was presented with the Stockholm
Industry Water Award for the company's efforts to reduce water usage and improve their overall
environmental impact.[citation needed]
Focus of Growth Post MFA
In late 1990’s and later, the focus was the textile business because of the end of Multi-Fiber
Arrangement (MFA) which opened a host of opportunities to Indian exporters. In this period,
Aditya Birla Group took a three route strategy for growth.
• Acquire and Build Garment brands for local and international markets
Jayashree textiles was acquired by Aditya Birla Nuvo (formerly Indian Rayon), is a leading
producer and exporter of yarns and fabrics to 50 countries with a turnover of $413 million. It
acquired Madura Garments in 2000 to enter the branded garments business. Has brands such as
Louis Philippe, Van Heusen, Peter England, Allen Solly, SF Jeans among others and also a
global supplier to global buyers such as Marks & Spencer’s, Polo etc.
AV Cell Inc., a joint venture between Aditya Birla Group and Tembec, Canada, established
operations in 1998 to produce softwood and hardwood pulp for the purpose of internal
consumption among different units of the Group.
Together, Aditya Birla Group and Tembec, Canada have acquired AV Nackawic Inc., which
produces dissolving pulp, as a further step to integrate. Grasim industries Ltd. is a leading player
in the Viscose Staple Fiber (VSP). The Aditya Birla Group's VSF manufacturing plants straddle
Thailand, Indonesia, India and China. At each of these locations, further capacity expansions are
under way — in Thailand by 31 ktpa; in Indonesia by 37 ktpa; in India by 64 ktpa and in China
by 30 ktpa. These brownfield expansions, slated to be completed by the second quarter of 2008,
will further notch up the Group's VSF production from 566 ktpa to 727 ktpa and entail an
investment close to US$ 260 million.
Grasim wants to follow a strategy of backward integration, right from plantation stage to the
final VSF stage. The Group's VSF business operates through its three companies — Grasim
Industries in India, Thai Rayon Corporation in Thailand and Indo Bharat Rayon in Indonesia,
which also oversees its Chinese operations at Birla Jingwei Fibres, China.
Joint ventures
Thai Rayon
Promoted in 1974 by the Aditya Birla Group, Thai Rayon is the sole manufacturer of Viscose
Rayon Staple Fibre (VSF) in Thailand. More than 50 per cent of Thai Rayon's VSF throughput is
directly exported to more than 20 countries worldwide. The VSF meets the stringent quality
expectations of customers in USA, Mexico, Europe, Turkey, Canada, Israel, Australia, South
Korea, Philippines, Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
Marketed under the brand name of 'Birla Cellulose', the company produces a wide range of VSF
in engineered specifications for textiles and non-woven applications. The company's strong focus
on environmental protection is reflected through its investments in a sophisticated state-of-the-art
waste-water treatment plant and scientific waste disposal systems
Grasim Cement
Grasim Cement was set up as a greenfield cement plant at Raipur, Chhatisgarh, in 1995. Based
on the most advanced technologies, this plant has an annual installed capacity of 2.06 million
tpa.
The plant’s unique features include:
:: Asia’s first gamma ray belt analyser from Gamma Matrix (USA) ensuring the highest
standards in online quality control.
:: India’s first polycom (blast furnace slag grinder) with a dynamic air separator from Krupp
Polysius Germany, which helps to generate the desired homogeneous particle size
distribution.
:: One of the few single kiln cement plants producing more than eight varieties of cement.
:: Its captive power generation ensures a reliable power supply. The plant is also an ISO
14001, ISO 9001, and IQRS L-5 certified unit.
Aditya Cement
Commissioned in a record time of 22 months as a Greenfield 1.0 mtpa plant in 1995 in
Shambupura, Rajasthan, its current capacity is about 1.50 million tpa.
:: Aditya Limestone Mines wins the following awards at the Mines Safety Week 2004,
Udaipur:
Grasim ventured into cement production in the mid 1980s, setting up its first cement cement
player in India.
Grasim’s cement operations today span the length and breadth of India, with 11 composite
plants, 11 split grinding units, four bulk terminals and 64 ready-mix concrete plants as on 30
June 2009.
All the plants are located close to sizeable limestone mines and are fully automated to ensure
consistent quality. All units use state-of-the-art equipment and technology and are certified with
ISO 9001 for quality systems and ISO 14001 for environment management systems.
Leveraging the strong equity and goodwill of the house mark, the company has a strong national
brand UltraTech cement under the Aditya Birla Group logo. Grasim is also nurturing some
regional brands like Vikram Cement and Rajashree Cement.
Grasim is one of the largest ready mix concrete (RMC) players in India. RMC business is in a
rapid growth phase. The company has consolidated capacity of 11.31 million cubic meters with
the network of 64 plants as on 30 June 2009.
Grasim is also the largest producer of white cement in India, with a capacity of 560,000 tpa
as on 30 June 2009. Branded as "Birla White", white cement division manufactures world-class
white cement in a variety of textures and finishes. It has applications in floorings and exterior
wall finishes, apart from other innovative uses. The division also manufactures value added
products like putty, GRC etc. which are used in wall finishing and various architectural
applications.
Grasim, Nagda
2006
: Greentech Environmental Excellence Award by Greentech
: Foundation
: Distinguished Achiever Award to Mr. Ravi Uppal from the
: Aditya Birla Group
: Young Achiever Award to Mr. Rakesh Jha from the Aditya
: Birla Group
2005
: Environmental and Ecological Gold Award by Greenland
: Society
: Golden Peacock Eco-Innovation Award by IOD
:
: Safety awards for longest accident-free period (Membrane
: Cell) and lowest average frequency rate (CSA plant) by the
Government of India
: CII National Energy Management Award for the most
: energy efficient unit
: Certificate for Strong Commitment to Excel CII-Exim
: Bank Award for business excellence
: Rajiv Ratna National Award — Best Chief Executive Gold
: Award by Greenland Society
: Greentech Environment Excellence Award by the
: Greentech Foundation
: Rajiv Ratna National Award – Best Pollution Control
: Implementation Gold Award by Greenland Society
: Greentech Safety Gold Award by the Greentech
: Foundation
: National Safety Award by the Government of India
:
: Indira Gandhi Memorial National Award by the Greenland
: Society
: Vishkarma National Award by the Government of India
:
2004
: Grasim, Nagda received the FICCI Annual Award 2003-
: 2004 in recognition of corporate initiative in rural
development
Vikram Cement
: The first Indian unit to win the coveted TPM award from
: the Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance, Tokyo, in 1995
: The Ramakrishna Bajaj National Quality award in 1998
:
: The first cement unit in the world to receive IQRS level 5
: rating from DNV, The Netherlands
: The first cement unit in India to be certified ISO 14001
: (1997) and OHSA 18001 (certifications from DNV,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands, in 2001)
: SA 8000 certification achieved
:
Aditya Cement
2004
: Aditya Limestone Mines wins the following awards at the
: Mines Safety Week 2004, Udaipur:
Rajashree Cement
2004
: Birla Super Cement received the Environment Excellence
: Award under the silver category by GreenTech Foundation
: Birla Super Cement certified with the OHSAS 18001:1999
: for their occupational health and safety management
system by Det Norske Veritas (DNV)
2001
: National award for 'Quality excellence in the Indian
: Cement Industry' from the National Council for Cement
and Building Materials
1999
: IMC Ramakrishna Bajaj National Quality award
: (certificates of merit)
1995
: Jamnalal Bajaj Uchit Vyavahar Puraskar for fair business
: practices
1993
: Rajiv Gandhi National Quality award
:
• Mr. M. L. Apte
• Mr. S. G. Subhrahmanyan
• Mr. R. C. Bhargava
• Mr. S. B. Mathur
• Mr. B. V. Bhargava
• Mr. D. D. Rathi
• Adult education
• Non-formal education
• Medical camps
• Mobile clinics
• Irrigation
• Check dam
• Land developmen
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The OXFORD dictionary defines labour welfare an effort to make life worth
living for work man.
CHANDRA and SING (1983) found that the condition under which brick kiln
workers live subhuman. There were no rest hours and workman in klin was
made to work even in the advanced stage of pregnancy.
PRASAD (1984) pointed out that in many mines in Bihar workers were
provided with facilities for drinking water, toilets and other facilities.
PETER ROGERS Chairman, The strategic forum for construction has taken
up research in industries and have concluded that unsafe, disorganized and
dirty organizations lead to poor standards and settling for a compromise in
the needs mean risking of lives.
Article 38. The state shall strive to promote the welfare of the people
by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which,
Justice, social, economic and political shall inform all the institution of
the national life.
Article 39. The state shall, in particular, direct its policy towards
security.
a). That the citizen, men and women equally, have the rights to an adequate
means of livelihood.
b). That the ownership and control of the material resource are so distributed
so as to sub serve the common good.
c). That the operation of the economic system does not result in the
concentration of wealth and means of protection to the common determine.
d). That there is equal work for both men and women, and Article 42. The
State shall make provision for securing just and human condition for work
and for maternity relief.
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY:
facilities.
INTRODUCTION:
Research is the process of systematic and in-depth study or search for any
Particular topic, subject or area of investigation, backed by collection,
Compilation, presentation and interpretation of relevant details or data.
Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research problem.
It may be understood as a science of studying how research is done
Scientifically.
Research may develop hypothesis and test it. In it we study the various
Steps that are generally adopted by the researcher in studying his research
Problem along with the logic behind them.
Research must be based on fact observable data forms a sound basis for
Research inductive investigation lead better support to research finding for
Analyzing facts a scientific methodology of analysis must be developed and
Result interpreted logically.
It is necessary for the researcher to know not only the research method
or techniques but also the methodology. Thus, when we talk of research
Methodology we not only talk of the research methods but also consider the
Logic behind the methods we use in the context of our research study and
Explain why we are using a particular method or technique and why we are
Not using others so that research results are capable of being evaluated
Either by the researcher himself or by others.
RESEARCH DESIGN:
After formulating the problem the research design has to be Prepared. Preparation of research
design involves selection of means of Obtaining information, time available for research and
selection of Method of tabulation & presentation of data.
The research of my project is descriptive study. I have obtained Information by the HODof the
HR Department and some of the Employees of the organization & also from annual reports of
company, Newspapers, magazines and websites.
The way of selecting a sample is known as the sample design. Here the researcher used
Simple Random Sampling.
SAMPLING DESIGN:
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES:
The sampling technique used for carrying out this study is RANDOM
Sampling technique.
SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING :{ meaning]:
Simple Random Sampling is the foundation of probability sampling. It’s a special case of
probability sampling in which every unit in the population has an equal chance of being included
in a sample. Simple random sampling also makes the selection of every possible combination of
the desired number of units likesly.sampling may be done with or without replacement
SAMPLE UNIT:
A smallest non-divisible part of the population is called a unit. A unit should be well defined and
should not be ambiguous.
TARGET POPULATION:
SAMPLE SIZE:
HYPOTHESIS:
SAMPLING METHOD:
The statistical tools used such percentage; diagrams, Chi-square test& one way ANOVA
‘F’ test have been used.
CHI – SQUARE TEST :
The Chi – square test amongst the several tests of significance developed by statisticians.
A very powerful testing the significance of the discrepancy between theory and experiment is
given by Prof. Karl Pearson in the year 1990 and is known as “Chi-square test of goodness
of fit ”.
It enables us to find it the deviation of the experiment from theory is just by chance (or) is it
really due to inadequacy of the theory to fit the observed data. If Oi (I = 1,2,3…n) is a set of
observed [experimental / frequencies] and E (I = 1,2,3…) is the corresponding set of expected
[theoretical or hypothetical] frequencies then Karl Pearson’s Chi – square given by
X2=i=0n[Oi-EiEi]
The Chi – square is applicable in large number of problems. The test is in fact a technique
through the use of researchers to test the goodness of fit, test the significance of association
between two attributes and test the homogeneity or the significance of popular varience.
One-Way ANOVA’F’Test:
The t test is commonly used to test the equality of two population means when the data
are composed of two random samples. We wish to extend this procedure so that the equality of
population means can be tested using r independent samples. Thus the hypothesis and the
r≥2
alternative are
H 0 : µ1 = µ2 = ... = µ r
H1 : at least two means are not equal
Where
µ j , j = 1, 2,..., r is the mean of the jth population.
In designing an experiment for a one-way classification, units are assigned at random to any one
of the r treatments under investigation. For this reason, the one-way classification is sometimes
referred to as a completely randomized design.
Table No – 4.1.1
1 18 to 25yrs 33 33
2 26 to 32yrs 34 34
3 33 to 40yrs 21 21
4 41 to 50yrs 12 12
The above table shows that one third (34percent) of the respondents were in 26 to 32yrs age, 33
percent of the respondents were in 18 to 25yrs, 21 percent of the respondents were in 33 to 40yrs
and remaining 12 percent of the respondents were in 41 to 50yrs.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.2
1 UG 51 51
2 PG 49 49
The above table indicates that half (51 percent) of the respondents were in under graduates and
remaining 49percent of the respondents were in PG.
Frequency
1 Rs.10000 43 43
2 Above Rs.10000 57 57
The above table indicates that more than half (57 percent) of the respondents were in above
Rs.10000 and remaining 43 percent of the respondents were in Rs.10000.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.4
1 Below 5yrs 54 54
2 Above 5yrs 46 46
The above table indicates that more than half (54 percent) of the respondents were in below 5yrs
experience and remaining 46 percent of the respondents were in above 5yrs.
Frequency
1 Highly satisfied 47 47
2 Satisfied 32 32
3 Neutral 11 11
4 Dissatisfied 5 5
Strongly
5 5 5
dissatisfied
The above table reveals that nearly half (47 percent) of the respondents were in highly satisfy for
the job satisfaction, 32 percent of the respondents were in satisfied, 11 percent of the respondents
were in neutral and remaining equally 5 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and
highly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.6
1 Highly satisfied 17 17
2 Satisfied 50 50
3 Neutral 23 23
4 Dissatisfied 8 8
5 Strongly dissatisfied 2 2
The above table reveals that half (50 percent) of the respondents were in satisfy for the company
satisfaction, 23 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 17 percent of the respondents were in
highly satisfied, 8 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and remaining 2 percent of the
respondents were in strongly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.7
1 Highly satisfied 30 30
2 Satisfied 37 37
3 Neutral 15 15
4 Dissatisfied 13 13
5 Strongly dissatisfied 5 5
The above table reveals that one third (37 percent) of the respondents were in satisfy for the
relevant job, 30 percent of the respondents were in highly satisfied, 15 percent of the respondents
were in neutral, 13 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and remaining 5 percent of the
respondents were in strongly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.8
1 Highly satisfied 20 20
2 Satisfied 33 33
3 Neutral 25 25
4 Dissatisfied 13 13
5 Strongly dissatisfied 9 9
The above table reveals that one third (33 percent) of the respondents were in satisfy for the offer
good salary, 25 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 20 percent of the respondents were in
highly satisfied, 13 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and remaining 9 percent of the
respondents were in strongly dissatisfied.
Frequency
1 Highly satisfied 16 16
2 Satisfied 43 43
3 Neutral 27 27
4 Dissatisfied 9 9
5 Strongly dissatisfied 5 5
The above table shows that nearly half (43 percent) of the respondents were in satisfy for the
convenient duty time, 27 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 16 percent of the
respondents were in highly satisfied, 9 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and
remaining 5 percent of the respondents were in strongly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.10
1 Bonus 24 24
2 Vehicle 32 32
3 Mobile 13 13
4 Medical 14 14
5 Loans 17 17
The above table shows that one third (32 percent) of the respondents were in vehicle allowances,
24 percent of the respondents were in bonus, 17 percent of the respondents were in loan, 14
percent of the respondents were in medical and remaining 13 percent of the respondents were in.
Mobile
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.11
1 Highly satisfied 19 19
2 Satisfied 38 38
3 Neutral 19 19
4 Dissatisfied 17 17
5 Strongly dissatisfied 7 7
The above table shows that one third (38 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied
promotional policy, equally 19 percent of the respondents were in highly satisfied and neutral, 17
percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and remaining 7 percent of the respondents were
in strongly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.12
Distribution of the respondents and their welfare facility duration of prescribed time
1 1-2weeks 24 24
2 2-3weeks 31 31
3 3-4weeks 19 19
4 4-5weeks 17 17
5 5-6weeks 9 9
The above table reveals that one third (31 percent) of the respondents were in 2 to 3 weeks take
time for sanction welfare facility, 24 percent of the respondents were in 1to2 weeks, 19 percent
of the respondents were in 3 to 4 weeks, 17 percent of the respondents were in 4 to 5 weeks and
remaining 9 percent of the respondents were in 5 to 6 weeks.
Frequency
1 Highly satisfied 17 17
2 Satisfied 40 40
3 Neutral 29 29
4 Dissatisfied 4 4
5 Strongly dissatisfied 10 10
The above table shows that one third (40 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for good
environment, 29 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 17 percent of the respondents were
in highly satisfied, 10 percent of the respondents were in strongly dissatisfied and remaining 4
percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.14
1 Highly satisfied 26 26
2 Satisfied 38 38
3 Neutral 23 23
4 Dissatisfied 8 8
5 Strongly dissatisfied 5 5
The above table shows that one third (38 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for work
place cleanliness, 26 percent of the respondents were in highly satisfied, 23 percent of the
respondents were in neutral, 8 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and remaining 5
percent of the respondents were in strongly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Cleanliness facility
Table No – 4.1.15
1 Highly satisfied 18 18
2 Satisfied 42 42
3 Neutral 20 20
4 Dissatisfied 11 11
5 Strongly dissatisfied 9 9
The above table reveals that more than half (42 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for
provision for welfare facilities, 20 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 18 percent of the
respondents were in highly satisfied, 11 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and
remaining 9 percent of the respondents were in strongly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Welfare facility
Table No – 4.1.16
1 Highly satisfied 20 20
2 Satisfied 43 43
3 Neutral 25 25
4 Dissatisfied 12 12
5 Strongly dissatisfied 0 0
The above table reveals that more than half (43 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for
our job security, 25 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 20 percent of the respondents
were in highly satisfied and remaining 12 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied.
Frequency
1 Highly satisfied 20 20
2 Satisfied 40 40
3 Neutral 23 23
4 Dissatisfied 16 16
5 Strongly dissatisfied 1 1
The above table reveals that more than half (40 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for
the top level management relationship, 23 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 20 percent
of the respondents were in highly satisfied, 16 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and
remaining 1 percent of the respondents were in highly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.18
1 Highly satisfied 24 24
2 Satisfied 37 37
3 Neutral 28 28
4 Dissatisfied 7 7
5 Strongly dissatisfied 4 4
The above table reveals that one third (37 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for the
assured insurance, 28 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 24 percent of the respondents
were in highly satisfied, 7 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and remaining 4
percent of the respondents were in highly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Distribution of the respondents and their time to spend with their family
1 Highly satisfied 26 26
2 Satisfied 35 35
3 Neutral 30 30
4 Dissatisfied 8 8
5 Strongly dissatisfied 1 1
The above table reveals that one third (35 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for
company provide time to spent your family, 30 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 26
percent of the respondents were in highly satisfied, 8 percent of the respondents were in
dissatisfied and remaining 1 percent of the respondents were in highly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.20
1 Highly satisfied 19 19
2 Satisfied 44 44
3 Neutral 23 23
4 Dissatisfied 10 10
5 Strongly dissatisfied 4 4
The above table reveals that nearly half (44 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for
provident fund with drawl facility, 23 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 19 percent of
the respondents were in highly satisfied, 10 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and
remaining 4 percent of the respondents were in highly dissatisfied.
Frequency
PF withdrawal facility
Table No – 4.1.21
Distribution of the respondents and top management commitment to solve the problems.
1 Always 21 21
2 Sometimes 34 34
3 Never 31 31
4 No opinion 14 14
The above table reveals that one third (34 percent) of the respondents were in sometimes to help
their help to problem solving, 31 percent of the respondents were in never, 21 percent of the
respondents were in always and remaining 14 percent of the respondents were in no opinion.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.22
1 Highly satisfied 31 31
2 Satisfied 38 38
3 Neutral 20 20
4 Dissatisfied 7 7
5 Strongly dissatisfied 4 4
The above table reveals that one third (38 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for leave
facility for festival and family functions, 31 percent of the respondents were in highly satisfied,
20 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 7 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied
and remaining 4 percent of the respondents were in highly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Leave facility
Table No – 4.1.23
1 Highly satisfied 25 25
2 Satisfied 42 42
3 Neutral 16 16
4 Dissatisfied 13 13
5 Strongly dissatisfied 4 4
The above table reveals that nearly half (42 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for time
to spent Birla white, 25 percent of the respondents were in highly satisfied, 16 percent of the
respondents were in neutral, 13 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and remaining 4
percent of the respondents were in highly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Table No – 4.1.24
1 Highly satisfied 23 23
2 Satisfied 32 32
3 Neutral 28 28
4 Dissatisfied 15 15
5 Strongly dissatisfied 2 2
The above table reveals that on third (32 percent) of the respondents were in satisfied for present
gratuity method, 28 percent of the respondents were in neutral, 23 percent of the respondents
were in highly satisfied, 15 percent of the respondents were in dissatisfied and remaining 2
percent of the respondents were in highly dissatisfied.
Frequency
Method of calculation
Table No – 4.1.25
18 to
16 9 3
1 25yr 2 (6.1%) 3 (9.1%)
(48.5%) (27.3%) (9.1%)
s X2 =
26 to 5.346
17 11 3
2 32yr 2 (5.9%) 1 (2.9%)
(50%) (32.4%) (8.8%) Df = 12
s
P > 0.05
33 to
8 7 4
3 40yr 1 (4.8%) 1 (4.8%) Not
(38.1%) (33.3%) (19%)
s Significan
41 to t
5 1
4 50yr 6 (50%) 0 0
(41.7%) (8.3%)
s
The above table shows that there is no significant association between age of the respondents and their
job satisfaction. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. (Table value = 21.026)
Research hypothesis
There is a significant association between age of the respondents and their job satisfaction.
Null hypothesis
There is no significant association between age of the respondents and their job satisfaction.
Statistical test
Findings
The above table shows that there is no significant association between age of the respondents and their
job satisfaction. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. So the research hypothesis rejected
and the null hypothesis accepted.
Table No – 4.1.26
Association between gender of the respondents and their welfare measures help to solve the
problem
20 X2=4.521
1 Male 8 (16.3%) 15 (30.6%) 6 (12.2%)
(40.8%)
Df = 3
P > 0.05
13 11
2 Female 19 (37.3%) 8 (15.7%)
(25.5%) (21.6%) Not
Significant
The above table shows that there is no significant association between gender of the respondents and their
welfare measures help to solve the problem. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. (Table
value = 7.815)
Research hypothesis
There is a significant association between gender of the respondents and their welfare measures help to
solve the problem.
Null hypothesis
There is no significant association between gender of the respondents and their welfare measures help to
solve the problem.
Statistical test
Findings
The above table shows that there is no significant association between gender of the respondents and their
welfare measures help to solve the problem. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. So the
research hypothesis rejected and the null hypothesis accepted.
Table No – 4.1.26
Association between educational qualification of the respondents and their relevant job
Relevant job
Highly Statistic
Education Neutr
Sl.n satisfi Satisfi Dissatisfi Strongly al
qualificati al
o ed ed ed dissatisfi inferenc
on (n=15
(n=30 (n=37) (n=13) ed (n=5) e
)
)
19 7 X2=2.681
17
1 UG (37.3% (13.7 6 (11.8%) 2 (3.9%)
(33.3%) Df = 4
) %)
P > 0.05
11 8
20 Not
2 PG (22.4% (16.3 7 (14.3%) 3 (6.1%)
(40.8%) Significa
) %)
nt
The above table shows that there is no significant association between educational qualification of the
respondents and their relevant job. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. (Table value =
9.488)
Research hypothesis
There is a significant association between educational qualification of the respondents and their relevant
job.
Null hypothesis
There is no significant association between educational qualification of the respondents and their relevant
job.
Statistical test
Findings
The above table shows that there is no significant association between educational qualification of the
respondents and their relevant job. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. So the research
hypothesis rejected and the null hypothesis accepted.
Table No – 4.1.27
Association between salary of the respondents and their company offering good salary
13 X2=2.270
Rs.1000 14
1 6 (14%) (30.2% 6 (14%) 4 (9.3%)
0 (32.6%) Df = 4
)
P > 0.05
Above 12
14 19 Not
2 Rs.1000 (21.1% 7 (12.3%) 5 (8.8%)
(24.6%) (33.3%) Significa
0 )
nt
The above table shows that there is no significant association between salary of the respondents and their
company offering good salary. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. (Table value = 9.488)
Research hypothesis
There is a significant association between salary of the respondents and their company offering good
salary.
Null hypothesis
There is no significant association between salary of the respondents and their company offering good
salary.
Statistical test
Findings
The above table shows that there is no significant association between salary of the respondents and their
company offering good salary. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. So the research
hypothesis rejected and the null hypothesis accepted.
Table No – 4.1.28
Job security
Statistic
Highly Neutr
Sl. Satisfi Dissatisf Strongly al
Salary satisfi al
no ed ied dissatisfi inferenc
ed (n=25
(n=43) (n=12) ed (n=0) e
(n=20) )
7 X2=4.987
Rs.1000 7 23
1 (16.3% 6 (14%) 0
0 (16.3%) (53.5%) Df = 3
)
P > 0.05
Above 18
13 20 Not
2 Rs.1000 (31.6% 6 (10.5%) 0
(22.8%) (35.1%) Significa
0 )
nt
The above table shows that there is no significant association between salary of the respondents and their
job security. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. (Table value = 7.815)
Research hypothesis
There is a significant association between salary of the respondents and their job security.
Null hypothesis
There is no significant association between salary of the respondents and their job security.
Statistical test
Findings
The above table shows that there is no significant association between salary of the respondents and their
job security. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. So the research hypothesis rejected and
the null hypothesis accepted.
Table No – 4.1.29
Association between experience of the respondents and their time to spent BIRLA WHITE
6 X2=7.799
Below 18 24
1 (11.1% 5 (9.3%) 1 (1.9%)
5yrs (33.3%) (44.4%) Df = 4
)
P > 0.05
10
Above 7 18 Not
2 (21.7% 8 (17.4%) 3 (6.5%)
5yrs (15.2%) (39.1%) Significa
)
nt
The above table shows that there is no significant association between experience of the respondents and
their time to spent BIRLA WHITE. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. (Table value =
7.815)
Research hypothesis
There is a significant association between experience of the respondents and their time to spent BIRLA
WHITE.
Null hypothesis
There is no significant association between experience of the respondents and their time to spent BIRLA
WHITE.
Statistical test
Findings
The above table shows that there is no significant association between experience of the respondents and
their time to spent BIRLA WHITE. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. So the research
hypothesis rejected and the null hypothesis accepted.
Table No – 4.1.30
1 Between
1.258 3 .419
Groups
1.32
G1 (n=33) 2.61
1
1.12 F = .293
G2 (n=34) 2.62
9
P > 0.05
1.15
G3 (n=21) 2.33
5 Not Significant
1.08
G4 (n=12) 2.58
4
2 137.49 1.43
Within Groups 96
2 2
The above table shows that there is no significant difference between age of the respondents and their
promotional policy. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value.
Research hypothesis
There is a significant difference between age of the respondents and their promotional policy.
Null hypothesis
There is no significant difference between age of the respondents and their promotional policy.
Statistical test
One way ANOVA ‘f’ test was used the above hypothesis
Findings
The above table shows that there is no significant difference between age of the respondents and their
promotional policy. Hence, the calculated value greater than table value. So the research hypothesis
rejected and the null hypothesis accepted.
I. FINDING RELATED TO MAJOR SOCIO – DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS :
1. 32% of the respondents are in the age group of 26%32 yrs (Table 4.1)
2. 51% of the respondents are in the under graduates (Table 4.2)
3. 57% of the respondents are in the Income group of Rs. 10,000 (Table 4.3)
4. 54% of the respondents are in the 5 yrs experience (Table 4.4)
FINDINGS:
I. GENERAL FINDINGS :
The researcher has found after visiting the spots and places related with welfare
facilities the statutory conditions. According to the factories act 1948, are fulfilled in welfare
activities. Most of the employees are satisfied with the welfare facilities and most of the
employee are well aware with the measures activity. The company takes good care of its
employees.
With available information the researcher suggest that the company should
further, to reduce the bad opinion’s about the facilities provided. Welfare facilities to employees
not only to increase productivity but also increase the standard of the living of the employees.
The researcher hope that the company must considered the suggestion and pay
more attention for further improvement.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
EDITION.
EDITION.
IN
QUESTIONNAIRE
I. PERSONAL INFORMATION:
• Name [optional ] :
8. How much time it will take for sanctioning special welfare facility?
15.Are you satisfied with the time that Birla White gives, to spend with
your family at home?
16. Are you satisfied with the withdrawal facilities in the employee
provident fund Scheme?
Highly satisfied [ ] Satisfied [ ] Neutral [ ]
Dissatisfied [ ] Highly Dissatisfied [ ]
17. Do the welfare measures help in solving the problems faced by
employees?
Always [ ] Sometimes [ ] Never [ ] No opinion [ ]
18. Are you satisfied with the festival or family function to provide
leave in BIRLA WHITE?
Highly satisfied [ ] Satisfied [ ] Neutral [ ]
19. How would you rate the time spent in BIRLA WHITE
20. Are you satisfied with the present method of calculation of gratuity