GST in India - Objectives, Concerns and Challenges

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 44

Parmod K.

Bansal
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co, Advocates
10776, Partap Nagar, Delhi–7
Ph –98102-88440
Goods & Service Tax E-mail – [email protected]

An Unprecedent Reform in History of Indirect taxes


GST – Background
Û GST - Next generation of reforms in the area of Indian
Indirect taxes
Û Replacement of VAT at state level and excise and service
taxes at the national level (besides a host of local levies)
Û Central government has already released a Discussion paper
Û Constitutional amendment is a prerequisite to introduction
of GST
Û Integration of efforts required not only between the Centre and all the States, but also
between various departments of the Centre (i.e. department of Service tax, Excise and
customs) and of the respective States (i.e. department of VAT, Octroi, Entry tax, etc)
Û Mutual exclusivity of taxation of services by Centre and of sale of goods by State will no
longer remain
Û Government committed to implement the same effective April 1st, 2011

2
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Expected Benefits

Û GST rate – Presently, the combined rate of indirect taxes on goods are close to 22% which
shall be reduced to 12-18%, benefiting trade and industry
Û GDP gains – Detailed study by Task force has estimated GST to provide gains to India’s GDP
from 0.9%-1.7%
Û Reduction in prices of goods – Estimated to decline as cascading effect of taxes may be
eliminated
Û Export-oriented industries would become
internationally more competitive as entire taxes in
supply chain would be refunded (zero-rating)
Û Import-substituting industries would also become
competitive as prices of Indian commodities would
reduce

3
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Expected Benefits

In a phased manner, we will be able to achieve a single


CGST and SGST rate for both goods and services.
The gain from GST will propel India from a $1-trillion
economy to a $2-trillion economy in a short span of time.
Therefore, the successful implementation of GST would
create win-win-win situations for the Centre-State, industry
and consumers.

Pranab Mukerjee -
Finance Minister, India 4
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Content

Indirect Taxes – A Journey of Reforms

VAT & Central Excise – Present regime

How will GST work

Examples and Illustrations

GST – Key concerns, issues & Challenges

5
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Indirect Taxes – a Journey of Reforms

Û Erstwhile Sales tax and Central excise regime –


No credit available on Payment of taxes at each level
resulting in cascading effect of taxes – price of
commodity increased substantially
Û Central Excise – Concept of VAT introduced (i.e.
MODVAT wef March 1, 1986 which was later
christened as CENVAT)
Û Service tax – 1994 being first year when services also
brought within ambit of Indirect taxes – No credit
availability at time of introduction – Later concept of
CENVAT extended to Service tax also – Input credit on
Service tax and CENVAT can be utilized on payment of
Output tax (i.e. discharge of liability of Service tax and
Central excise)
Û VAT – Nationwide roll-out of VAT in April 1st, 2005 – Availability of input tax credit against
output tax liability – However, CST not yet integrated in current regime; Any CST paid not
available as credit 6
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Indirect Taxes – a Journey of Reforms
Û Goods & Service Tax – Next generation of reforms in the area of Indian Indirect taxes
§ Introduced for first time in 1954 in France – now prevalent in more then 150 countries
§ Replacement of VAT at state level and excise and service taxes at the national level
(besides a host of local levies)

§ Discussion paper on GST released in 2009


laying down the roadmap for new regime
§ Revised Target date now kept as April 1st,
2011

7
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Content

Indirect Taxes – A Journey of Reforms

VAT & Central Excise – Present regime

GST – Justification & proposed regime

Discussion Paper on GST

GST – Key concerns, issues & Challenges

8
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Pitfalls in existing regime
Û No benefit of CENVAT (Excise paid on goods and service tax
paid on services) in discharging Sales tax liability and vice-
versa, so chain broken
Û No benefit of CST (i.e. no credit on inter-state sales) –
Resulting in manufacturers to setup distribution depots in
other states or make sales through consignment agents
Û Non-inclusion of several Central taxes in the overall framework of CENVAT, such as
additional customs duty, surcharges, etc.
Û In existing State-level VAT structure, several taxes which are in the nature of indirect
taxes viz. luxury tax, entertainment tax, etc., and yet not subsumed in VAT

9
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
VAT & Central Excise – Present regime (Example #1)
X-Raw
Material
supplier

Service tax
V-Service
Excise & VAT Provider

1. For Y, Cenvat credit on account of


Excise & CST Excise and Service tax paid on
Y-Manufacturer inputs is available as credit for
utilisation against Excise on sale of
goods to Z.

2. Input credit of only VAT available


for utilisation against CST liability;
No credit if CST had been paid
while making purchases

10
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
VAT & Central Excise – Present regime (Example #1)
1. For Z, while discharge of VAT / CST liability, no
credit available for CST (only VAT paid locally is
available as credit)

2. Cenvat credit not available to Z for utilisation

3. Suppose W is a professional (service provider),


then also no credit available of VAT/ CST for
setting off against liability of Service tax

Excise & CST


Y-Manufacturer

VAT / CST

W-Consumer
(Professional)
11
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
VAT & Central Excise – Present regime (Example #1)
X-Raw
Material
supplier

Service tax
V-Service
Excise & VAT Provider

Thus, there are lot of


inefficiencies in the whole supply
chain in view of unavailability of
Excise & CST
Y-Manufacturer credit for utilisation against other
indirect levies.

VAT / CST

W-Consumer
(Professional)
12
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Pitfalls in existing regime

Û As services outside the ambit of State Taxation, governments resorting to tax through
right to use, etc.
§ Advancement in digitization and Information technology blurring the distinction (like
taxation of software) and
§ increase cost of products in case of composite contracts (involving both goods and
services)
State governments unable to generate sufficient revenue from services, so exclusion
they tend to increase tax rates on goods and increase compliance

13
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
VAT & Central Excise – Double taxation of software (Example #2)

Service tax applicable under


category of ‘Information technology
Software services’ – Supply of
customised software and
acquisition of ‘right to use’ software

Double taxation

A-Company B-Consumer

Many states are levying VAT on the


transfer of both packaged and
customised software.
14
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
VAT & Central Excise – Works contract (Example #3)
Û Levy of tax on Works contract is complex subject
Û As a principle, VAT is payable on the value of goods involved in
a works contract and service tax is payable on the value of
services provided.
Û Problem arises in Composite contract where contractors can
have certain options under both laws
§ Payment of tax at composition rates on the entire value
§ Abatement of value at prescribed percentage and
payment of tax on the abated value
Û Composite contracts may result in excess levy, then what it would have been in case of one
single levy on the entire value

15
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Content

Indirect Taxes – A Journey of Reforms

VAT & Central Excise – Present regime

How will GST work

Examples and Illustrations

GST – Key concerns, issues & Challenges

16
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST key points – Concept

Û Concept – Taxable event is ‘supply of


goods’ and ‘supply of services’ as against
‘manufacture of goods’, ‘sale of goods’ and
‘rendition of services’.
Û Multiple statutes: one for centre and one
each for each of the states.

Û Rate structure : Three rates on the rest of the transactions – two rates for goods – a lower
rate for “necessary items and goods of basic importance” and a standard rate for the rest,
and a third rate for services
Û Uniform state GST threshold – proposed at Rs 10 lakh [Threshold for central GST for
goods could be kept at Rs 1.5 crore and for central GST on services may also be
appropriately high]

17
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Subsuming of Taxes – Centre & State GST

Central Excise Countervailing


Duty Duty (CVD)

Centre Additional Special


Taxes on which
GST Excise Duty Additional decision to be
Duty (SAD) made
Surcharge &
Cess Service Tax
Purchase Tax

Stamp Duty
Value Added Entry tax not in
Vehicle Tax
Tax lieu of Octroi
State Entertainment Luxury Tax
Electricity duty

GST Tax
Lottery Tax
State Cess &
Surcharge Sales Tax
18
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST key points – Concept

Û Dual GST: a central GST (CGST) and state GST (SGST) to apply on the same base – on Inter-
state transactions, IGST proposed which covers both CGST & SGST - Exports to be zero-rated
and all imports subject to GST
Û Area based exemption - Exemptions will be modified - goods exempt so far will be
charged to tax - Benefit of exemption promised to such units could be retained as post tax
cash refunds to be effected by the Centre / State
Û Administration - Timely refund where credit accumulation
takes place - PAN-linked taxpayer identification number, to
allow for easy sharing of information across the different tax
administrations, including income tax - functions such as
assessment, enforcement, scrutiny and audit to be
undertaken by the authority which is collecting the tax, with
information sharing between the centre and the states.
Û Alcoholic products and tobacco – Status quo maintained

19
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Content

Indirect Taxes – A Journey of Reforms

VAT & Central Excise – Present regime

How will GST work

Examples and Illustrations

GST – Key concerns, issues & Challenges

20
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Proposed regime
X-Raw
Material
supplier

GST – CGST & V-Service


GST – CGST & SGST Provider
SGST

1. For Y, CGST on sale to Z discharged


from CGST paid to X & V (similarly
Y-Manufacturer GST – CGST & for SGST) – Efficiency in supply
SGST
chain as all taxes paid now
available as credit

* CGST shall be paid to Centre and


SGST to State

21
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Proposed regime

1. For Z, CGST on sale to W


discharged from CGST paid to Y
(similarly for SGST) – No
consideration that supply in inter-
state trade would not entitle for
availability of credit (as was the
case for CST)

Y-Manufacturer GST – CGST &


SGST

GST – CGST &


SGST

W-Consumer
22
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Proposed regime
X-Raw
Material
supplier

GST – CGST & V-Service


GST – CGST & SGST Provider
SGST

Erstwhile inefficiencies on
account of taxes levied by
different administrative
Y-Manufacturer GST – CGST & machineries (Centre and State) or
SGST different States (State A or B) will
get removed

GST – CGST &


SGST

W-Consumer
23
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Calculation

Sales 130 Sales 150 Sales 160


GST @10% 13 GST @10% 15 GST @10% 16
Invoice 143 Invoice 165 Invoice 176

ISS ISS Local

A-Manufacturer B-Wholesaler C-Retailer D-Consumer


Maharashtra Delhi Haryana Haryana

Stages of Supply Purchas Value Value of GST rate GST on ITC Net GST
chain e value Addition Supply output

Manufacturer 100 30 130 10% 13 10 13-10=3

Wholesaler 130 20 150 10% 15 13 15-13=2

Retailer 150 10 160 10% 16 15 16-15=1

24
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Credit utilisation

CGST CGST credit can be utilised only against CGST liability

SGST SGST credit can be utilised only against SGST liability

IGST consist of 2 components i.e. CGST & SGST – Available


IGST CGST credit can be utilised against CGST portion while SGST
credit against SGST portion

25
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Local Sale

Local Sales

A-Manufacturer B-Consumer
Delhi Delhi

Particulars Amount-Rs
Under the GST model of
Sales 150,000 taxation, both CGST and SGST
CGST @5% of Sales 7,500 would be charged – CGST to
SGST @7% of Sales 10,500 be deposited with Centre and
SGST with Delhi
Sales Price 168,000

26
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Local Sale

Local Sales

A-Manufacturer B-Consumer
Delhi Delhi

Particulars CGST SGST


Output tax 7,500 10,500
Less: Input tax credit
- CGST 4,000 -
- SGST - 5,000
Net tax payable in cash 3,500 5,500
Deposit with Deposit with
Centre Delhi
27
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Inter-state Sale & Stock transfer

Inter-state Sales /
Branch transfer /
Consignment

A-Manufacturer B-Consumer
Delhi Haryana

Particulars Amount-Rs
Under IGST model of taxation
Sales 150,000
– Both CGST & SGST to be
CGST @5% of Sales 7,500 deposited with Centre (SGST
SGST @7% of Sales 10,500 portion to be transferred by
Centre to Haryana)
Sales Price 168,000

IGST
28
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Inter-state Sale & Stock transfer

Inter-state Sales /
Branch transfer /
Consignment

A-Manufacturer B-Consumer
Delhi Haryana

Particulars CGST SGST


Output tax 7,500 10,500
Less: Input tax credit
- CGST 4,000 -
- SGST - 5,000
Net tax payable in cash 3,500 5,500 For onward transfer
to Haryana by Centre
Deposit with Deposit with
Centre Centre
29
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Export

Export

A-Manufacturer B-Importer
India USA

Particulars CGST SGST


Under GST model of
Output tax - -
taxation – Exports are
Less: Input tax credit zero-rated i.e. no tax on
- CGST 4,000 - goods, but credit
available (can be
- SGST - 5,000 refunded or utilised
Net tax payable in (4,000) (5,000) against local sales)
cash
30
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Import

Import

A-Manufacturer B-Exporter
Delhi, India USA

Particulars Amount-Rs
Import 150,000
Under GST model of
CGST @5% of import 7,500 taxation – even imports
SGST @7% of import 10,500 would be subjected to
Purchase Price 168,000 CGST & SGST

31
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Credit Utilisation Illustration

Description Quantity Value of CGST @5% SGST @7% IGST


sold goods sold @12%

Sale within State 8,000 80,000 4,000 5,600 -


Export Sales 3,500 35,000 - - -

Inter-state sales 6,500 65,000 - - 7,800


Total 18,000 180,000 4,000 5,600- 7,800

Particulars CGST SGST IGST


Total IGST liability was
Output tax 4,000 5,600 7,800 Rs 7,800 (which
Less: Input tax credit consisted of CGST –
3,250 (5% of 65,000)
- CGST (Rs 10,000) 4,000 - 3,250 & SGST – 4,550 (7% of
- SGST (Rs 14,000) - 5,600 4,550 65,000)

Net tax payable in - - -


cash
32
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Content

Indirect Taxes – A Journey of Reforms

VAT & Central Excise – Present regime

How will GST work

Examples and Illustrations

GST – Key concerns, issues & Challenges

33
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Constitutional amendments

Û Constitutional amendments for levy of GST by both the Centre and States – Centre
already in advanced stages of discussion.
§ Presently Constitution empowers Centre to levy and collect income tax (Entry No 82 of
List I in 7th schedule to Constitution), Custom duties (83), Excise (84), Central Sales tax
(92B), Service tax (92C);
§ States list includes octroi (Entry No 52 of List II in 7th schedule to Constitution), tax on
sale or purchase of goods (54)
§ Now as both Centre and States would get power to levy tax on goods and services, a
constitutional amendment is required.
§ Law Ministry likely to finalise the Constitutional
amendment Bill which it proposes to introduce in
Parliament soon – Ratification by 8 states required
before assent by the President of India

34
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Agreement on GST rates
Û Final rate with allocation between CGST & SGST not yet finalised
Û Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee recently proposed a 3-rate structure for GST which will
simplify the indirect tax regime – under which
§ goods will attract 20% levy,
§ services 16%
§ essential items a concessional 12%.
wherein both Centre and State would have an equal share
Û After initial protest, States are filing in line as Centre
have agreed to compensate States for revenue
losses consequent to the shift.
Û However, a number of industries currently outside
the indirect tax net could come within the purview
of the GST
Û Single GST rate is desirable as multiple rates become
source of complexity and disputes adding to the cost
of tax administration and compliance.
35
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Draft GST legislation
Û Option I - One centre legislation and each State to
have its own legislation –
Û Option II - Government can also go the way CST is
being levied – legislation enacted by the Centre but
administration and enjoyment of benefits by
respective States
Û However, with deadline round the corner, no draft of
CGST & SGST laws out for discussion in public domain
Û Harmonization of Standards - Legislations to elaborately include all definition rules
defining the taxable consideration, input tax credit, timing of tax payments and
adjustments in special circumstances, tax form design and audit, enforcement and appeal
procedures, classification of goods and services, definition of export and import, etc
Û Simplification of legislation is key factor for keeping disputes as low as possible – Design of
tax forms and compliance procedures - The appeal forms, fees, pre-deposit requirement,
stay procedures, time lines, etc, will also need to be standardised for a better GST system

36
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – IT infrastructure

Û IT infrastructure is a key component for success of GST


Û States as well as the Centre agreed to setup a clearing house to resolve tax collections and
credits under the National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) as a SPV.
Û The clearing house, a key part of the GST architecture, is expected to ease the creation of
the common market, ensure that each state gets its share of revenue and also provide useful
tax information to the authorities.
Û The proposal envisages a standard electronic return, which each of the estimated 8 million
establishments will be required to file every month.
Û Centralized / integrated system integrating
payments, refunds, returns and tracking of inter-
state movement of goods and services – end to end
tracking with proper re-conciliation and exception
reports for enforcement agencies for assessment

37
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Transition Rules

Û An area of concern – various questions in stakeholders’


minds
Û How the existing input tax credit under the excise and the
VAT laws will be allowed to be transitioned into the GST
system - can SGST arising in the post-GST period be paid out
of input tax credit of state VAT (i.e. relating to pre-GST
period) & CGST out of Cenvat credit balance as on date of
transition?
Û Transition issues to shift from the litigation under the existing
tax litigation system to the litigation system under the GST
regime?
Û who would be the refund granting authority for any amount
pre-deposited pending litigation under the pre-GST period
but decision delivered in the post-GST regime?

38
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Taxation on services

Û Two Options available for taxation of services


§ Option I – Maintaining positive list (as in current Service tax legislation)
§ Option II – Maintaining negative list (as practiced internationally)

Û In inter-state trade, taxation of goods comparatively much easier then services


Û Issue will arise in treatment of financial services, insurance, banking, telecommunication,
passenger and freight transportation from one state to another, etc – which are
rendered and consumed in different states –
Û Place of supply rules for purpose of taxability (similar to the one
pertaining to export and import of services under the current
service tax legislation) need to be defined elaborately which are
not yet in place

39
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Dispute resolution mechanism
Û Challenges that will be faced for Tax litigation system
§ Unifying the tax litigation policies and processes under the GST regime
§ In a dispute over any transaction, will one have to file two appeals, i.e., one for state
GST and the other for central GST? The answer may be even more complex in the case
of inter-state transactions attracting integrated GST (IGST).
§ The other difficulty that may arise is due to destination-based tax principle. Will it mean
that the goods or services provider will have to file an appeal in the destination state
over dispute arising on goods or services supplied by him, especially in a B2C scenario

40
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Advance Ruling mechanism
Û There is a procedure in some states to obtain an
order on determination of disputed question; in
some states additionally, there exists an advance
ruling mechanism.
Û Excise and Customs advance ruling authorities are
different from the VAT advance ruling authorities.
Û Under the GST regime, whether these processes
can be clubbed into a single, simple and standard
appellate or advance ruling mechanism.

41
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Other issues
Û Subsuming of stamp duty and purchase tax in GST transactions
Û GST applicability on Supplies by public bodies and non-profit organization (health and
education services)
Û Administration of such a complex legislation which will subsume lots of taxes would be an
enormous task
Û A study by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has brought out startling
details of the manner in which several states are operating the value-added tax (VAT)
system.

Over half of the hundred thousand dealers covered


under the CAG audit in 23 states were engaged in tax
evasion. Tax evasion of Rs 873 crore was detected from
the scrutiny of only 2,600 returns in 15 states.

Û It is important that the operational flaws detected by the CAG report should be understood
and steps taken to prevent their recurrence when the state GST becomes operational from
April 2011.
42
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Training and awareness among stakeholders
Û Various stakeholders in the new regime (i.e.
Department officials, professionals, manufacturers,
service providers, trade associations, etc.) would
need to be trained on various provisions of new
legislation. The contours of new law would appear to
be complicated at the outset creating apprehensions
about the new regime.
Û Time required for shift – For companies, entire
systems have to be amended, such as purchase
orders and invoices and sales orders and invoices and
the accounting systems also which needs time.
Department officials would need training for
enforcing compliances.

43
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST would be a landmark initiative which would
kick start the next generation of reforms. All
stakeholders would need to gear themselves for the
regime.

You can send your comments


and suggestions at
[email protected]
We would be happy to hear
from you

44
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates

You might also like