GST in India - Objectives, Concerns and Challenges
GST in India - Objectives, Concerns and Challenges
GST in India - Objectives, Concerns and Challenges
Bansal
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co, Advocates
10776, Partap Nagar, Delhi–7
Ph –98102-88440
Goods & Service Tax E-mail – [email protected]
2
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Expected Benefits
Û GST rate – Presently, the combined rate of indirect taxes on goods are close to 22% which
shall be reduced to 12-18%, benefiting trade and industry
Û GDP gains – Detailed study by Task force has estimated GST to provide gains to India’s GDP
from 0.9%-1.7%
Û Reduction in prices of goods – Estimated to decline as cascading effect of taxes may be
eliminated
Û Export-oriented industries would become
internationally more competitive as entire taxes in
supply chain would be refunded (zero-rating)
Û Import-substituting industries would also become
competitive as prices of Indian commodities would
reduce
3
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Expected Benefits
Pranab Mukerjee -
Finance Minister, India 4
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Content
5
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Indirect Taxes – a Journey of Reforms
7
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Content
8
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Pitfalls in existing regime
Û No benefit of CENVAT (Excise paid on goods and service tax
paid on services) in discharging Sales tax liability and vice-
versa, so chain broken
Û No benefit of CST (i.e. no credit on inter-state sales) –
Resulting in manufacturers to setup distribution depots in
other states or make sales through consignment agents
Û Non-inclusion of several Central taxes in the overall framework of CENVAT, such as
additional customs duty, surcharges, etc.
Û In existing State-level VAT structure, several taxes which are in the nature of indirect
taxes viz. luxury tax, entertainment tax, etc., and yet not subsumed in VAT
9
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
VAT & Central Excise – Present regime (Example #1)
X-Raw
Material
supplier
Service tax
V-Service
Excise & VAT Provider
10
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
VAT & Central Excise – Present regime (Example #1)
1. For Z, while discharge of VAT / CST liability, no
credit available for CST (only VAT paid locally is
available as credit)
VAT / CST
W-Consumer
(Professional)
11
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
VAT & Central Excise – Present regime (Example #1)
X-Raw
Material
supplier
Service tax
V-Service
Excise & VAT Provider
VAT / CST
W-Consumer
(Professional)
12
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Pitfalls in existing regime
Û As services outside the ambit of State Taxation, governments resorting to tax through
right to use, etc.
§ Advancement in digitization and Information technology blurring the distinction (like
taxation of software) and
§ increase cost of products in case of composite contracts (involving both goods and
services)
State governments unable to generate sufficient revenue from services, so exclusion
they tend to increase tax rates on goods and increase compliance
13
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
VAT & Central Excise – Double taxation of software (Example #2)
Double taxation
A-Company B-Consumer
15
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Content
16
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST key points – Concept
Û Rate structure : Three rates on the rest of the transactions – two rates for goods – a lower
rate for “necessary items and goods of basic importance” and a standard rate for the rest,
and a third rate for services
Û Uniform state GST threshold – proposed at Rs 10 lakh [Threshold for central GST for
goods could be kept at Rs 1.5 crore and for central GST on services may also be
appropriately high]
17
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Subsuming of Taxes – Centre & State GST
Stamp Duty
Value Added Entry tax not in
Vehicle Tax
Tax lieu of Octroi
State Entertainment Luxury Tax
Electricity duty
GST Tax
Lottery Tax
State Cess &
Surcharge Sales Tax
18
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST key points – Concept
Û Dual GST: a central GST (CGST) and state GST (SGST) to apply on the same base – on Inter-
state transactions, IGST proposed which covers both CGST & SGST - Exports to be zero-rated
and all imports subject to GST
Û Area based exemption - Exemptions will be modified - goods exempt so far will be
charged to tax - Benefit of exemption promised to such units could be retained as post tax
cash refunds to be effected by the Centre / State
Û Administration - Timely refund where credit accumulation
takes place - PAN-linked taxpayer identification number, to
allow for easy sharing of information across the different tax
administrations, including income tax - functions such as
assessment, enforcement, scrutiny and audit to be
undertaken by the authority which is collecting the tax, with
information sharing between the centre and the states.
Û Alcoholic products and tobacco – Status quo maintained
19
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
Content
20
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Proposed regime
X-Raw
Material
supplier
21
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Proposed regime
W-Consumer
22
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST – Proposed regime
X-Raw
Material
supplier
Erstwhile inefficiencies on
account of taxes levied by
different administrative
Y-Manufacturer GST – CGST & machineries (Centre and State) or
SGST different States (State A or B) will
get removed
W-Consumer
23
Z-Dealer
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Calculation
Stages of Supply Purchas Value Value of GST rate GST on ITC Net GST
chain e value Addition Supply output
24
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Credit utilisation
25
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Local Sale
Local Sales
A-Manufacturer B-Consumer
Delhi Delhi
Particulars Amount-Rs
Under the GST model of
Sales 150,000 taxation, both CGST and SGST
CGST @5% of Sales 7,500 would be charged – CGST to
SGST @7% of Sales 10,500 be deposited with Centre and
SGST with Delhi
Sales Price 168,000
26
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Local Sale
Local Sales
A-Manufacturer B-Consumer
Delhi Delhi
Inter-state Sales /
Branch transfer /
Consignment
A-Manufacturer B-Consumer
Delhi Haryana
Particulars Amount-Rs
Under IGST model of taxation
Sales 150,000
– Both CGST & SGST to be
CGST @5% of Sales 7,500 deposited with Centre (SGST
SGST @7% of Sales 10,500 portion to be transferred by
Centre to Haryana)
Sales Price 168,000
IGST
28
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Inter-state Sale & Stock transfer
Inter-state Sales /
Branch transfer /
Consignment
A-Manufacturer B-Consumer
Delhi Haryana
Export
A-Manufacturer B-Importer
India USA
Import
A-Manufacturer B-Exporter
Delhi, India USA
Particulars Amount-Rs
Import 150,000
Under GST model of
CGST @5% of import 7,500 taxation – even imports
SGST @7% of import 10,500 would be subjected to
Purchase Price 168,000 CGST & SGST
31
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST concept with examples – Credit Utilisation Illustration
33
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Constitutional amendments
Û Constitutional amendments for levy of GST by both the Centre and States – Centre
already in advanced stages of discussion.
§ Presently Constitution empowers Centre to levy and collect income tax (Entry No 82 of
List I in 7th schedule to Constitution), Custom duties (83), Excise (84), Central Sales tax
(92B), Service tax (92C);
§ States list includes octroi (Entry No 52 of List II in 7th schedule to Constitution), tax on
sale or purchase of goods (54)
§ Now as both Centre and States would get power to levy tax on goods and services, a
constitutional amendment is required.
§ Law Ministry likely to finalise the Constitutional
amendment Bill which it proposes to introduce in
Parliament soon – Ratification by 8 states required
before assent by the President of India
34
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Agreement on GST rates
Û Final rate with allocation between CGST & SGST not yet finalised
Û Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee recently proposed a 3-rate structure for GST which will
simplify the indirect tax regime – under which
§ goods will attract 20% levy,
§ services 16%
§ essential items a concessional 12%.
wherein both Centre and State would have an equal share
Û After initial protest, States are filing in line as Centre
have agreed to compensate States for revenue
losses consequent to the shift.
Û However, a number of industries currently outside
the indirect tax net could come within the purview
of the GST
Û Single GST rate is desirable as multiple rates become
source of complexity and disputes adding to the cost
of tax administration and compliance.
35
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Draft GST legislation
Û Option I - One centre legislation and each State to
have its own legislation –
Û Option II - Government can also go the way CST is
being levied – legislation enacted by the Centre but
administration and enjoyment of benefits by
respective States
Û However, with deadline round the corner, no draft of
CGST & SGST laws out for discussion in public domain
Û Harmonization of Standards - Legislations to elaborately include all definition rules
defining the taxable consideration, input tax credit, timing of tax payments and
adjustments in special circumstances, tax form design and audit, enforcement and appeal
procedures, classification of goods and services, definition of export and import, etc
Û Simplification of legislation is key factor for keeping disputes as low as possible – Design of
tax forms and compliance procedures - The appeal forms, fees, pre-deposit requirement,
stay procedures, time lines, etc, will also need to be standardised for a better GST system
36
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – IT infrastructure
37
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Transition Rules
38
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Taxation on services
39
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Dispute resolution mechanism
Û Challenges that will be faced for Tax litigation system
§ Unifying the tax litigation policies and processes under the GST regime
§ In a dispute over any transaction, will one have to file two appeals, i.e., one for state
GST and the other for central GST? The answer may be even more complex in the case
of inter-state transactions attracting integrated GST (IGST).
§ The other difficulty that may arise is due to destination-based tax principle. Will it mean
that the goods or services provider will have to file an appeal in the destination state
over dispute arising on goods or services supplied by him, especially in a B2C scenario
40
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Advance Ruling mechanism
Û There is a procedure in some states to obtain an
order on determination of disputed question; in
some states additionally, there exists an advance
ruling mechanism.
Û Excise and Customs advance ruling authorities are
different from the VAT advance ruling authorities.
Û Under the GST regime, whether these processes
can be clubbed into a single, simple and standard
appellate or advance ruling mechanism.
41
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Other issues
Û Subsuming of stamp duty and purchase tax in GST transactions
Û GST applicability on Supplies by public bodies and non-profit organization (health and
education services)
Û Administration of such a complex legislation which will subsume lots of taxes would be an
enormous task
Û A study by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has brought out startling
details of the manner in which several states are operating the value-added tax (VAT)
system.
Û It is important that the operational flaws detected by the CAG report should be understood
and steps taken to prevent their recurrence when the state GST becomes operational from
April 2011.
42
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST Key Concerns – Training and awareness among stakeholders
Û Various stakeholders in the new regime (i.e.
Department officials, professionals, manufacturers,
service providers, trade associations, etc.) would
need to be trained on various provisions of new
legislation. The contours of new law would appear to
be complicated at the outset creating apprehensions
about the new regime.
Û Time required for shift – For companies, entire
systems have to be amended, such as purchase
orders and invoices and sales orders and invoices and
the accounting systems also which needs time.
Department officials would need training for
enforcing compliances.
43
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates
GST would be a landmark initiative which would
kick start the next generation of reforms. All
stakeholders would need to gear themselves for the
regime.
44
Balwant Rai Bansal & Co. Advocates