The uncomfortable truth about working from home
There is a difference between working remotely and working from home.
When you are a remote employee in a remote team it simply means that you and your teammates are not located in the same place. And that’s known to everyone from day one. That was a mutual agreement between you and your boss.
More and more companies become comfortable having distributed teams and remote employees. They put in place rules and practices, which support remote collaboration and minimise the drawbacks of not having everyone available at hand. People who work remotely quickly get to realise that they also need to adapt some routines in order to remain productive. We keep hearing testimonies from companies and individuals, who benefit from remote work and who share advice how to do it in a least frustrating way. Arguably, working remotely is on a trajectory to become the default in IT-related industries and I fully support this trend.
Then we have this concept of working from home as the opposite of working at the office. Like when you want to stay at home awaiting a plumber or a delivery. When you feel under the weather and call in sick. Or when your kid feels under the weather and you need to keep an eye if they don’t turn the house upside down while not at school. Or - as is the case in March 2020 - when your company mandated work from home to prevent COVID-19 from spreading.
Here working from home is not the norm - it’s the exception to the rule. Of course you ensure everyone that you’d be approachable anytime on email, messenger and phone. You promise to call in to all the meetings. And you even might tell yourself how much you’re going to get done when you won’t be distracted by the water cooler chats and coffee runs.
But in reality you end up doing some home chores while keeping your laptop open to pretend that you’re active. You call in to meetings with video off and keep scrolling the internet. You avoid reaching out to people for a meaningful discussion, because you’d rather do it face to face the other day.
And it’s not because you’re a lazy slacker (except that sometimes everyone is). In fact, you may just feel relieved that for a day or two you are away from the office realm. Your home is a safe place. Here you don’t need to look busy for 9 hours straight. You don’t need to put on a smile whenever your boss is around. And you don’t need to fake enthusiasm and engagement on the second hour of a meeting that doesn’t seem to reach any closure.
That is the problem.
Companies, who resist to set up remote teams, often claim that work from home degrades productivity and breaks social bonds. What I hear beneath these statements is fear of loosing control and power. These are the companies where managers and executives avoid the emotional labour required to build the culture of trust and mutual accountability. In turn, their employees gladly accept an opportunity to do a little bit less.
The uncomfortable truth is that good advice from all the "10 ways to make work from home awesome" articles will only work if you choose to really do the work.
Technology offers us increasingly more convenient tools and solutions that support distributed collaboration. Now it’s time for both leaders and employees to do the work and change their postures to adapt to the new circumstances. The consequences of COVID-19 outbreak signal that remote collaboration may be no longer a choice, but a default.
As a leader it is your responsibility to build the culture and practices that glue your people together into a highly functioning and responsible team. No matter if they work remotely on a daily basis or happen to be working from home.
As an employee it is on you to find or - even better - create a place where you will generously give your full self. No matter if you’re working at the office or from home.
I help growing early-stage web app products for private non-VC-backed companies that sell via 3rd party marketplaces.
4yWeird, what's wrong with "keeping your laptop open to pretend that you’re active" or "keeping scrolling the internet during meetings" (or avoiding reaching out to people) ? After all, do above behaviors constitute to a Job Being Done™ (or not done) ? I don't think so. My point is that one can have a fair impact even when doing aforementioned things. Perhaps some people are measuring the wrong impact: why measure if person is pretending active or scrolling the internet, while one should measure the real impact of the person work - i.e. customer cases resolved, new features shipped, marketing campaigns executed, etc... And that's tricky I guess. My 2c, Stay healthy. :)
Seasoned Product Manager
4yThanks for writing this article, Eve. I agree that building an effective WFH culture means you need to build a trust and motivation culture first. If you need to watch your employees to do their job (because when unwatched they stop working) then it is likely not a problem with your employees - it is a problem with your company's management style. Ideally your employees feel that they have impact, feel that they actually have ownership of the piece of product they work on, and they feel they are treated like adults and being cared for as equal members of the company. "We are on the same boat - we are working for the same goals, but with different roles" - should be the mantra. Which actually brings me to a certain observation. We are now facing an unprecedented situation with COVID-19. I am watching IT companies sending dramatic messages about business continuity, while trying to get the best out of WFH culture that they have managed (or not managed) to build in the past. But I have not yet seen a company which said: "folks, this is a difficult time, just take 2 weeks paid leave, BECAUSE WE CARE about you, about your families and your health and we trust you will use these two weeks to sort your things out, and prepare for potentially a much longer period of WFH. We'll help you set up your home offices in this period, but for now get some rest, and see you in two weeks. And then we will kick some ass with new energy." My point is: companies without a mature WFH culture, based on trust, will likely not survive the COVID-19 if they are forced to quarantine their employees for 4, 6, or more weeks. And not because of lack of technical means to support WFH for longer, but because people in such companies (not caring) will actually, unwatched and unmanaged, slow down their work to a crawl for much longer.
Staff Software Engineer at Ocado Technology
4yYes
Content & Communications Strategist | Marketing Communications | An avid Storyteller
4yI am one of those people who had a lot of trouble working remotely/ WFH, but then I made tiny changes that really helped, especially when I was a freelancer and there was no, "I can do this in person tomorrow". The Trick was to turn a little corner of my home into an office space, it could be the dining table, but it needed to have a door i could close or a curtain I could pull across. Then I would still wake up as if I was going to work, do all the task and from 9 - 5, I would close the door and "be at work" and take my assigned breaks. It took me a while to do it, but I did and of course NO Netflix.. not even, but its only one. I am still working on this!
Lead Ruby-on-Rails Developer Boards NL at ZorgDomein
4yYou raise a fair point, but to me it feels more like the saying: ill doers are ill deemers. You begin with trust, if you cannot trust your personnel, you will certainly not trust them working in another place where you don't have control. In my opinion you have to give some to get.