Response to the Rockefeller Foundation's attack on higher education

For those of you who missed it, the Rockefeller Foundation released a study today questioning if the college degree is the best way to screen candidates for entry level jobs. I am biased, but I certainly agree (and the data shows) that academic pedigree does not predict the success of a job candidate, nor should it be used to do so. I also agree that employers continue to use outdated methods to make hiring decisions and that cultural fit between an individual and company is vital.

However, the report goes on to conclude that many companies and employees do not benefit from the skills developed by individuals during college. In reality, even if one ignores the “hard skills,” this gives not credit for the benefits tied to time management, creativity, communication, interpersonal relations, empathy, and so many other soft / non-cognitive skills that are the foundation of post-secondary education.

I am not suggesting that post-secondary institutions are perfect, and there are plenty of ways colleges and universities can do improve. Doing more to help students appreciate the tie between the educational experience and careers. Further engaging alumni to serve as authentic mentors. Deepening ties with companies. Enhancing student outcomes. However, even with opportunities for improvement, the value provided by colleges and universities is massive and should not be undervalued.

I also appreciate and agree with the other message that we need to provide more career opportunities for underserved, disadvantaged individuals; however, I worry that ignoring the value of post-secondary education is not the right solution to this serious problem. Furthermore, with post-secondary education under attack from all directions, we need to do everything we can to continue to promote the value to students, companies, and other stakeholders while increasing accessibility and success for those from underrepresented communities.