Joins vs Split queries in SQL

Joins vs Split queries in SQL

Welcome to my newsletter! In “It Depends”, I’ll be discussing various trade-offs and challenges that software engineers face while working in teams and building real world applications.

Today’s article is about SQL joins - When should you use joins vs separate queries to fetch related data from a relational database?

Of course, it depends.

When you think relational databases, join queries may seem like the de-facto way to fetch data from multiple tables at once. In fact, the SQL database engines are optimized for it. However, with growing data volumes and complexity of your system, there are trade-offs to consider.

Sometimes, querying data separately and combining them in application code, although sounds like more work, can be an effective design choice.

Let’s explore the pros and cons between the two approaches:


Pros for joins:

✅ Fetching columns from multiple tables in a single query can provide lower network latency

✅ The DB engine can optimize join queries using indexed columns, yielding better performance


Cons for joins:

❌ While good for simple scenarios, complexity and volume of data can lead to higher execution times (higher latency) and more difficult maintainability

❌ Sub-optimal join queries on large datasets without proper indexing or relationship considerations can strain database resources, affecting scalability


Pros for separate queries:

✅ Code can be easier to maintain and debug since each query focuses on a specific task or requirement.

✅ Granular control over how and what data is fetched, allowing for more fine-tuned performance optimization


Cons for separate queries:

❌ Additional round trips between the application and the database server can potentially increase network latency / API slowness

❌ Can cause data inconsistency due to transactional isolations


To understand more about the value of each of these strategies, we must look at example use cases where they are applied. I will be publishing the full details of the examples on my Substack (https://siddiqus.substack.com)

Want to read about how I optimized an API to make it 100 times faster? Subscribe to my Substack!


Mohsin Ahmed Ohi

SDLC || STLC || Manual Testing || Automation Testing || Agile & Jira || Selenium || JMeter || Postman || JavaScript ES6

1y

Beautiful write up, subscribed

Sat Al Arab (Shatil)

Business Development Professional | Driving Digital Transformation

1y
Like
Reply
M. Asif Hossain

General Manager at PlugPress Co. | Technical Content Creator | Technical Support Manager

1y

I agree that joins are typically more efficient. Still, I also think separate queries can be a good choice in some cases. For example, if I need to return fewer data than needed or if I need more control over the join logic, then separate queries may be the better option. Ultimately, the best approach will vary depending on the specific requirements of our application. However, this article provides a good overview of the factors to consider when making this decision.

Rabby Hossain

Software Engineer @Transmedia Inc | Nodejs | TypeScript | Python | Micro-service | Problem Solver | Express.js | MongoDB | MySQL | AWS | Docker | k8s | Vue | React | Cypress | Artillery

1y

It would be more helpful if you use some example

Md. Meher Ullah

Software Engineer at Snappymob | Expertise in Full-Stack Development | Ex-Wipro | Delivering Scalable Solutions

1y

Subscribed <3

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics