How To Fix Employee Attrition

How To Fix Employee Attrition

Some — not a ton — more attention being paid recently to employee attrition, i.e. turnover. Written about employee turnover a couple of times, including the science of lessening it and something called “The Hawthorne Effect.” It’s interesting stuff. More people should care about these issues around employee attrition and turnover, and by “more people” in this context I mean “executives” — oh, wait, “senior decision-makers.” There are obviously a couple of major problems in this area, though:

Well, you should care about turnover and employee attrition. There is some legitimate research that less turnover can help the bottom line. (I’ve also mentioned this, in this post.)

What if preventing employee attrition had a quick fix? What if it was easier than we thought?

Prevent employee attrition: Some McKinsey research

Nice report here from McKinsey & Company on people analytics and “issues HR is getting wrong,” including this:

Too often, companies seek to win the talent war by throwing ever more money into the mix. One example was a major US insurer that had been facing high attrition rates; it first sought, with minimal success, to offer bonuses to managers and employees who opted to remain. Then the company got smarter. It gathered data to help create profiles of at-risk workers; the intelligence included a range of information such as demographic profile, professional and educational background, performance ratings, and, yes, levels of compensation. By applying sophisticated data analytics, a key finding rose to the fore: employees in smaller teams, with longer periods between promotions and with lower-performing managers, were more likely to leave.

I’d say this is a pretty crucial paragraph. First off, it addresses the biggest concern of executives — cost. “I don’t want to spend money to retain the middle ranks,” an executive snarls. “I want that money getting me and my wife to Saint Lucia, baby!” Unfortunately, the only way most organizations know how to solve any problem is toss money at it. (That’s also the only way most families know how to solve a problem in the middle class ranks, naitch.) And then — A HA! — look what this company does: they use data! DATA! IT’S THE FUTURE! (Well, mostly.)

And what did they find? Exactly what you’d expect. Employee attrition comes from terrible managers and people who aren’t getting rewarded for the work they do.

So what’s the quick fix?

It’s not per se quick, but the general idea is this. Let’s get better managers. How about we promote less assholes?

This seems like a gargantuan task. Let’s try to make heads or tails of it:

In short, we’re going to train up managers — improve the front line leadership — and make them value-add. And I bet what happens next is: lowered employee attrition.

But don’t good managers also cause turnover?

Of course. But it’s the good kind of turnover. People are advancing in their careers. Hell, they may even be taking on more responsibility for your company. (Internal recruitment!) It’s always hard to see someone leave a role they were good at, because it might mean more legit work for the manager, but …

Good managers create the kind of turnover that makes you say “Awwww, that employee is growing.” Bad managers create the kind of turnover that makes you want to put a shotgun to your genitals. Ever heard of a PIP?

So it ain’t rocket science on employee attrition

You want less of it? Train up your managers so they do something of value. Most of the paper-pushing they do all day could probably be handled within a CRM and be much more effective. They need to be much more. In the simplest terms, they need to actually manage. That, and respecting employees + providing them a few perks or opportunities, is going to lower employee attrition.

David Kovacovich

Socializing Engagement to Produce Measurable Results

1y

I agree with the concept of formulating better program structures for managers to follow and automating the process. This makes the process simpler and produces actionable data. However, tying manager bonuses to employee attrition is a dangerous game, my friend. This could very-well create more micro-management and managers silo-ing talent. When a certain financial services company tied manager bonuses to employee survey results, the process was bastardized and critical data lost to "I'm not going to rock the boat by sharing my real opinion" ethos. Unfortunately, many good ideas are subject to manipulation by those out for themselves as opposed to evolving the greater good. I also agree with the premise of making recognition of effort and growth an essential management component (as opposed to weekly one : one meetings being a focus on missteps). Hope all is great, Teddy!!

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics