Evolving Environmental Activism: From Stewards to Guardians for Lasting Impact

Evolving Environmental Activism: From Stewards to Guardians for Lasting Impact

The human role in solving the polycrisis. 

The anthropogenic notion of being separate from nature is highly problematic, akin to post-humanists arguing that humans are equal to all other living beings. We need to acknowledge our interdependence with nature and also recognize the power we hold, which surpasses that of other life forms on the planet. The term "stewards" is inadequate as it implies control, leading to arrogance that hinders our ability to address the crisis. Instead, we should embrace responsibility and approach the task with the required humility. By doing so, we can become the guardians of this remarkable planet. To achieve this shift, we must first understand the root cause of the problem.

The root cause

The fundamental cause of the crisis lies in the capitalist system. Capitalism is a socio-economic framework centered on private ownership of the means of production, driven by profit. It encompasses the accumulation of capital, competitive markets, a price system, private property, recognition of property rights, voluntary exchange, and wage labor.

The term "polycrisis" refers to the interconnected crises of climate change, inequality, and political instability. These crises are rooted in the inherent contradictions of capitalism.

One of the central contradictions of capitalism is the pursuit of profit. Businesses strive to maximize profits, leading to continuous growth and expansion, which results in overconsumption of resources and environmental destruction. The climate crisis is a direct consequence of this relentless pursuit of profit.

Another contradiction arises from the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, leading to inequality and social unrest. The privileged few exploit the marginalized and vulnerable, leaving the majority of the population to bear the brunt of the polycrisis.

The polycrisis demands immediate action. We must boldly break free from capitalism and forge a new, sustainable, and just system to safeguard humanity and the planet.

We don't need a new vision build on old ideals

Both socialism and capitalism can present issues when they imitate the consumer-driven "good life." Denmark serves as an illustrative example, with a welfare system built on socialist principles yet still centered around a growth-based capitalist economy. As a result, Denmark's wealth comes at the cost of emitting more per capita than any other nation, prompting us to reconsider our approach to the concept of a "good life."

We must exercise caution when constructing a new vision for society, avoiding reliance on outdated ideals. History reveals that radical ideas have the potential to transform material conditions and ignite collective desire. However, it also cautions us that improperly considered, these ideas can lead to increased oppression. It is essential to tread thoughtfully and critically when embracing change to ensure positive outcomes for all.

A new vision is needed

To inspire change, the green movement must recognize that people don't require constant management; they are capable of finding their own solutions. However, what we lack is a shared vision.

The goal of social movements is not to get everyone to think alike but to get everyone who thinks differently to fight for the same cause. 

To do this we must reimagine the green movement, uniting around a common understanding that the root cause of our problems lies in an unjust system perpetuating inequality. 

We need to go beyond simply telling people what to move away from and start showing them where we should go.

Developing and articulating a clear vision is essential for systems change. It should show people what a new system could be like and help them comprehend its benefits. Only then can we truly enable a green revolution.

Envision a world where we do not release more greenhouse gasses than can be naturally sequestered, where we do not extract resources at a rate faster than ecosystems can replenish, and where pollution remains within the capacity of the environment to cope. A society where we must work together in making collective decisions, ensuring equitable distribution of wealth, and break free from the idea that prosperity solely relies on endless economic growth.

To achieve this transformation, we must let go of outdated concepts, theories, and approaches. The polycrisis offers an opportunity to create a new and improved world, and it is our responsibility to envision and shape the path towards this better future.Only by uniting behind these a common vision of a better world can we enable real change. 








Hej Kasper and thanks for the article.  Somehow it seems that shared visions always played an integral part in the old “regime”, from tyrants, democracies to master architects, shared visions have always squeezed everyone into and out of the same tube. I believe as you write that people are capable, and too trust this on all levels is a fundamental key. I would rather not have somebody to show me where to go, as this undermines and robs individuals and communities of the responsibility of finding out. 

Like
Reply
Ana-Maria Răducanu

Carer of Everything Organic

1y

Nice to see the attention flowing towards this subject, that there is growing interest for the next wave of environmental activism. From my observation, the assumption behind the article as starting point is somehow delaying the conversation. We don't need a new vision of what is needed, this already exists in places such as ecovillages. From my experience it is not the lack of vision that keeps us where we are. Rather there are two other aspects that I am curious about when it comes to evolving the ecological activism when having this other assumption, that we already know what and how it should be. One is the aspect of collective experience of the vision, how do we experience collectively our highest future possibility? How do we collectively sense the vision? The other aspect is better described by Otto Scharmer in U Theory and is about embodiment - how do we collectively download the vision into living practice? A simple example, we know already a lot of the things that should be done different, we know we should stop consuming single use plastic and yet we are far from acting alligned with what we know. For both there is a space of not knowing yet, but what a breakthrough that would be.

Like
Reply
Basham Zain

#ECOIST, Eco-Socialist, Historian, Sanatani Shaman, Ambassador of Indus River, Nature conservationist, Regenerative agent, Visual Artist, Environmental Journalist & Ecopreneur

1y

Feel like i am only one to ignite this Blue fire in Pakistan. Please support Ecoist. https://ecoist.eco I call it the Chapter of Great #regeneration from #indus and anyone who is specialized in leading a social movement, please consider guiding and setting my directions as Paksitan means ~ 300 million humans densely living in Indus plains sizing ~ Ireland.

Like
Reply
Brita Staal

Earth empath⏐Climate- & sustainability strategist⏐Chairwoman⏐Impact investor⏐Climate reality leader⏐Founder & NGO builder⏐All about climaterisk; #adaptation #mitigation

1y

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics