Enlisting Big Data in the War Against Cancer
It’s almost impossible to pick up a newspaper without seeing an article describing some potential breakthrough in cancer. If all of the advancements mentioned in the articles lived up to half of their potential, cancer would already be a manageable nuisance, instead of the death sentence it far too often is. Somewhere between the stories we read and the reality we live, there is a disconnect.
The key to more personalized and precise care and eventual cures for diseases such as cancer, diabetes and Alzheimer’s lies largely in our ability to use big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning to better understand the diseases’ genetically based algorithmic patterns. In other words, before we can win the war against cancer, we must first unlock its code. Cancer, like all genomic disorders, is a computation problem.
I’ve worked in technology for the better part of two decades. Yet a few years ago, when a loved one was diagnosed with cancer, I was shocked at how little data and technology had permeated her clinical care. Asking doctors to treat cancer patients without the benefit of modern software is like asking someone to drive at night with no headlights. It’s reckless.
We have mountains of data, algorithms, cutting-edge analytics and software in the palm of our hands every day helping us navigate our world. And while highly regulated industries tend to adopt technology more slowly than nonregulated ones, we can and must bring these tools to health care and to the fight against diseases like cancer.
The time to act is now. Americans spent more than $3.2 trillion on health care in 2015 and The National Institutes of Health projects that by 2020, the total annual cost for cancer treatment in the U.S. will reach $173 billion. Nevertheless, cancer still kills roughly 600,000 people each year in the U.S.; it is the second leading cause of death behind heart disease. And, of course, the toll that cancer takes on individual patients and families is immeasurable.
As consumers of health care, we should demand more. We must empower physicians to make real-time, data-driven decisions. Integrating genomic sequencing with clinical data will allow us to learn from the millions of people diagnosed with cancer every year. Knowing how patients were treated and how they responded will improve the care for everyone that comes after them.
To achieve this, we need to tackle two data challenges. First, we need to generate far more molecular data than currently exists, which starts with driving down the costs of genomic sequencing. Second, we must integrate this data with a patient’s electronic medical record, so that physicians can understand its clinical context: Without marrying genomic data with clinical data, we are assembling only half the information necessary to make personalized medicine a reality.
When the first personal computer was built, it was just a pile of sensors and circuit boards; then someone wrote the first operating system, connecting the keyboard to the screen, running applications and allowing people to enter commands. Eventually that operating system unified many disparate functions into a cohesive problem-solving tool. It’s time to bring these same capabilities to cancer care.
There are reams of data, algorithms, analytics and software available to physicians treating patients. But these valuable information assets exist almost entirely in silos, each disconnected from the other. Without an operating system that brings these tools together, the promise of personalized medicine will remain just a promise.
Cancer has the fortitude of millions of years of evolution on its side. To better treat those who suffer from it – and one day eradicate it entirely – we need to reimagine how we battle the disease. We need the power of big data on our side. Asking doctors to treat patients with anything less is simply unacceptable.
(This piece first appeared at usnews.com)
Founder & CEO - RatedDoctor.com “a Marketing platform for Doctors & Pharma / Founder - Denton Capital U.K.
3yAbsolutely! Without marrying insights from analyzing big data with clinical data, our fight against cancer would be futile! Augmented intelligence rather than Artificial intelligence is the answer.
Digital Technology Business Development Executive-Life Sciences/Pharmaceutical Industry
4yTerrific insight! The future looks bright with innovators such as Eric Lefkofsky at the helm of leading edge technology. Kudos, my friend!
Executive IT Leader
5yWow... that is some education and quite a sound assessment. So encouraged to read this. I will add that balancing the trend between leveraging technology toward the private & government sectors etc. versus healthcare, should be a serious conversation. It really should! My personal experiences are frustrating enough to be so bold as to say that in the US, it is almost criminal that the Healthcare Industry has to manage on its own... be it funding toward the general education of the public; handholding of patients that are suffering the dire consequences of a future uncertain; or toward families having to deal with said patients in circumstances that resemble third world atrocities. With the absence of technology at doctors disposal through no fault of medical personnel, it makes no sense. As an IT person in Information Management/Analytics, I have lived through it all, mostly personal. With all of the funding so effortlessly chanelled otherwise, this has to have a voice and be adressed.... this trend of technology contribution to certain industries versus others...?? What are we as individuals doing to change our loved ones futures? What are we doing?
CEO/President @ InvivoSciences Inc. | TedX speaker, Biotech, Finance, Leadership, Technology Entrepreneur, Titan 100 CEO 2024
6yWould love to collaborate
Always Striving for Altruism in Life and Leadership
7yAbsolutely agree with your assessment, but one of the biggest challenges in Health Informatics is the diversity of platforms in electronic medical record systems. Even though it is now mandated nationally since 2014 for health organizations to transition to Electronic Health Records, they have not come up with a good central repository system or requirements for all of these health entities to share this data. I spent 18 years in the Insurance Industry where data is essential to rate making and underwriting. The big difference is organizations such as Choicepoint brought together all of the consumer level data such as claims, driving records etc., and the insurance companies could plug in their custom algorithms to generate what was needed to fit their underwriting needs. We need something similar in health care.