Apple Isn't Changing Music Streaming—Record Labels Are
Photo: jvk / Flickr

Apple Isn't Changing Music Streaming—Record Labels Are

Last week I started writing a post about Apple's new streaming service, which will likely debut in June. I was convinced their product would be the clear winner in the music streaming game—but now I'm not so sure.

Let's set the scene.

Apple transformed the music industry with iTunes. As financial analyst Toni Sacconaghi told the New York Times, "They’re used to being a shaper rather than a responder." Because the company dominated digital downloads, it held the trump card in negotiations with record labels and other industry stakeholders. Its impact on sales was profound (and not universally positive): in 2000, Americans bought 943 million CD albums. In 2007, they bought 819 million digital singles and only 500 million CDs. iTunes made a powerful and permanent dent in physical music sales.

Then Apple spent too long resting on its laurels.

While they were relying on an increasingly outdated music model, Spotify snagged 60 million active users. Pandora and iHeart Radio took first and second place for music streaming market penetration. Apple's iTunes Radio gets points for brand awareness, sure, but it's a virtual copy of Pandora (ads and all). The streaming landscape has been getting more and more crowded. Apple's acquisition of Beats last year muddied the waters even further.

When we finally started getting juicy details about Apple's new service, though, I was sold. The product, which will be released on iOS and Android, will blend components of Beats with Apple's features and aesthetic. The kicker was its rumored price tag: at $7.99, this offering would have been $2 below the $9.99 standard set by Spotify, Rdio, Pandora, and others. It's a small discount, but with streaming's plethora of very similar services, I think it would have sealed the deal for the Cupertino fruit company.

That all changed, though, when the record labels got involved. They put the kibosh on the new price—and, perhaps for the first time, Apple couldn't fight back. The company lost some of its power within the industry, and now Apple needs the labels as much as the labels need Apple. It needs more exclusive releases like Beyoncé's surprise album drop in 2013. According to the New York Times, Jimmy Iovine is using his sway to make headway, and it certainly helps that the subscription service won't have a free tier like Spotify's. But it remains to be seen whether Apple can shift the balance of power back in its favor.

For now, record labels have levelled the playing field. For services like iTunes and Spotify, robust catalogs are crucial—and that's where labels can exert their influence. While many are quick to call them a dying breed, their dealings with Apple prove this is anything but true. After all, they still have a seat at the table.

Gabe Chagolla CDL Semi Class A Truck Driving Jobs

CDL Truck Driver @ USPS | Commercial Driver's License

9y

Nice article

Sundeep Bhatia

Specialist employment law solicitor. Helping businesses to stop their greatest asset, their staff, turning into their greatest liability | Protecting the rights of employees

9y

I agree.Apple are no longer the trendsetter or market dictator in music distribution.

Like
Reply
David B. Grinberg

PR consultant and ghostwriter advising leaders on strategic communication solutions to optimize brand visibility | Former White House staff and political appointee at OMB | Former national spokesman at U.S. EEOC

9y

Katie Carroll - Another good read. Sounds like record labels are taking a bite out of Apple. Thanks for sharing this interesting info!

Like
Reply
Gerald Sears

Passionate Learner looking for the next stage. | Industrial Technology, Information Technology, Six Sigma

9y

Wait. You can't just put out the 2000 and 2007 numbers without looking at the total volume of sales. It doesn't matter if fewer physical copies were sold if the difference was made up with digital sales. Also there is the matter of de-bundling when digital allows you to buy some songs on the album and not others. Yes it impacts sales but it means that only the strongest, best songs are sold a rise in quality. If you're a capitalist shouldn't this be the impact and competition you're looking for?

Syed Peer

Director of Engineering | Program / IT Manager | Ex-MySpace | Ex-BofA

9y

Interesting post! Thanks for sharing.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics