Vikram Bharati’s Post

View profile for Vikram Bharati, graphic

Founder, Draper Startup House

In 1933, the Montevideo Convention established a clear framework for what defines a country. According to this convention, a state must meet four criteria: 1️⃣ Permanent Population: A country must have people who live there consistently. 2️⃣ Defined Territory: It needs clear borders and recognized land. 3️⃣ Government: There must be an organized political system in place. 4️⃣ Capacity to Enter into Relations with Other States: The ability to engage in diplomatic and international relationships is crucial. These criteria have guided our understanding of nationhood for nearly a century. However, in today's rapidly evolving digital world, we're beginning to see the emergence of new, unconventional forms of communities and countries. One such example is a digital country. A digital country aims to transcend physical borders, uniting citizens globally through shared values, interests, and digital engagement. It raises an intriguing question: Can a digital country ever be considered a "country" by the Montevideo Convention's traditional standards? ➡ Permanent Population: While a digital country's citizens are not bound by geography, they form a consistent and engaged community online. ➡ Defined Territory: Unlike traditional states, a digital country's "territory" exists in the digital realm, challenging the notion that land is a necessary component of nationhood. ➡ Government: A digital country can have an organized leadership and governance structure, albeit in a decentralized and digital format. ➡ Capacity to Enter into Relations with Other States: This digital country can and does engage with traditional states and international organizations, advocating for its citizens and promoting its mission. As we move further into the digital age, it's worth considering whether our traditional definitions of nationhood can or should evolve. Digital communities might not fit the Montevideo Convention's criteria perfectly, but they offer a compelling vision of what the future of countries might look like. What are your thoughts? Can a digital country meet the essential criteria set forth in 1933? How might our understanding of nationhood need to change to accommodate these new forms of community, such as Draper Nation? If you are interested in the concept of a digital nation, learn more at 👉 drapernation.com

  • map

Some of the nations in the continent of Africa were erroneously annexed to form artificial nations about 100 years ago. These legacy artificial nation states are facing very many social causes of unhappiness that have led to unprecedented immigrations to the Western world therefore causing too much economic burden on European and American tax payers. The concept of digital country fixes this century old errors by reorganising these nations and therefore solving most of the contemporary social causes of unhappiness in the legacy African "nation states" like poverty, corruption, unemployment, extrajudicial killings, election riggings, human rights abuse etc that are caused by poor undemocratic governances. These reorganised nations in the digital countries will meet all the essential criteria set forth in 1933. I look forward to forking Draper Nation for my community and am also a proud citizen of Draper Nation that I am hopeful will one day bootstrap many upcoming digital countries in the upcoming International Community.

Like
Reply
Simon Studer

Audit Partner, Head of Regional Market Bern-Mittelland at KPMG Switzerland

4mo

Is this the idea of a DBVN coming back? would love that

Like
Reply
Kannan parakunnil

Founder&Ceo:Grasshopper Gastronomics Pte Ltd.

4mo

Good one Vikram Bharati

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics