Out now: The T7 Italy Communiqué outlining research-based policy recommendations to support discussions at the Group of Seven (#G7) Apulia Summit on June 13-15, 2024. The Communiqué distills key reccommendations from 23 policy briefs published under T7 Italy's 4 Task Forces comprising over 100 multisectoral contributors. Privileged have been a part of the process - which I hope does not conclude with the publication. Here's hoping for intensified dialogue and advocacy to operatisonalise proposed solutions. T7 Policy Brief: Towards Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy AI: Implementing the G7 AI Hiroshima Policy Framework: https://lnkd.in/dbatJgig T7 Communique 👇 https://lnkd.in/dag4n_sr Global Solutions Initiative IAI - Istituto Affari Internazionali ISPI - Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale
Vidisha Mishra’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Strong policy discussion on AI in the EU. Audrey Herblin-Stoop from Mistral AI provided an insightful and much needed reality check. To keep up with the global AI race, EU urgently needs: 1. More financing for AI companies 2. More super computers and related infrastructure 3. To provide access to large sets of data in various EU languages to train AI models and preserve EU cultural norms. Otherwise future AI-generated content will be based mainly on data from US and China.
🔴The EU's Artificial Intelligence ambitions conference is starting now! 🔹 Opening remarks, by ECA President Tony Murphy (FCCA) 🔹 Panel discussion with: Dragos Tudorache, Member of the European Parliament Pēteris Zilgalvis, Judge at the General Court of the European Union Audrey Herblin-Stoop, Head of Global Public Affairs & Communications Mistral AI Kilian Gross, Head of Unit at the European Commission Artificial Intelligence Policy Development and Coordination Lucia Russo, Artificial Intelligence Policy Analyst at the OECD - OCDE Holger Hoos, Chair of the Board of Directors CLAIRE 🔹 Closing remarks, by ECA Member Mihails Kozlovs Join us LIVE ↓ https://lnkd.in/dS64rfez
The EU's Artificial Intelligence ambitions: What progress has the EU made in implementing AI policy?
https://www.youtube.com/
-
👉🏼 Regulatory news 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 Artificial Intelligence Act adopted as Regulation on 13-Mar-2024 (https://lnkd.in/eS58t4yM): ▶ European Parliament officially approved the AI Act ▶ is now subject to final lawyer-linguist check ▶ will enter into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal, and be fully applicable 24 months after it enters into force 👉🏼 More news on #medicaldevice #regulation from us: https://lnkd.in/eHs3khty #MDR #IVDR #EuropeanUnion #RegulatoryAffairs
-
The EU AI Act came into force recently. We unpack how it works and the impact these new laws are likely to have on Australia’s own AI regulation journey.
The European Union has enacted its Artificial Intelligence Act. We consider its applicability to Australian organisations, and subsequent potential impact on the development of artificial intelligence regulation in Australia. Find out more https://lnkd.in/g9j_DkT6 Authors: Thomas Crowe, Prasanth Kapilan
-
-
Abogado Internacional Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Chile – División Derecho Internacional, Tratados y Asuntos Legislativos - LL.M in U.S. Law
📣 📣 📣 The European Commission on behalf of the #EU announced this week the signing of the Council of Europe Framework Convention on #ArtificialIntelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. The highlights are: a. Focus on human-centered AI consistent with human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. b. Risk-based approach. c. Key principles for trusted AI (including transparency, robustness, security, governance, and data protection). d. Transparency for AI-generated content and in interactions with AI systems. e. Strengthened documentation, accountability, and avenues for recourse. f. Risk management obligations. g. Documentation obligations. h. Oversight mechanisms for IA activities. These guidelines provide an effective framework at the international level to address the risks posed by AI to human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. In this context, the Convention establishes a common approach to ensure that activities within the life cycle of AI systems are compatible with fundamental rights and democratic principles while allowing for innovation and trust. Thus, the instrument covers AI systems that may interfere with democratic stability, human rights, and a rules-based order, based on a differentiated and risk-based approach. The principles and obligations in the Convention will apply to activities within the life cycle of AI systems undertaken by public authorities or private actors acting on their behalf. As far as private sector actors are concerned, while the risks and impacts of AI systems still need to be addressed in a manner consistent with the objectives of the Convention, they have the option of directly applying the obligations of the Convention or implementing appropriate alternative measures. The Convention includes exemptions for research and development as well as for national security. It is open for accession by members of the Council of Europe, the EU, and other third countries worldwide. It should be noted that the negotiations included the European Commission negotiating on behalf of the EU, as well as other member states of the Council of Europe, the Holy See, the United States, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Israel, Australia, Argentina, Peru, Uruguay, and Costa Rica. In addition, contributions were received from 68 international representatives from civil society, academia, industry, and other international organizations to ensure a comprehensive and inclusive approach. #AI #HR #humanrights #dataprivacy #democracy #ruleoflaw
-
#JeanMonnet Prof. '#EULaw, #Ethics & #Values', #Digitalization, #AI, #EUHealthLaw, #InTodaysOJ on #EURLex, #EU4schools | 🇪🇺
#InTodaysOJ on #EURLex, Council Decision (EU) 2024/2218 of 28 August 2024 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the #CouncilofEurope #FrameworkConvention on #ArtificialIntelligence and #HumanRights, #Democracy and the #RuleofLaw, ELI: https://lnkd.in/enzeru-u 💡 "The Convention lays down general #principles and #obligations that parties to the Convention should observe to ensure the protection of human rights, democracy and the rule of law in relation to the activities within the lifecycle of artificial intelligence (AI) systems." (recital 2) 💡 "the personal and material scope of the Convention and the substantive provisions of the Convention coincide to a large extent with Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 [i.e. the #AIAct]" (recital 5; N.B. arguing why the EU enjoys exclusive external competence to sign the Convention) 🔗 Framework Convention: https://lnkd.in/e9XYjzpq Dr. Lukas Staffler, LL.M. Martin Ebers Joaquín Cayón Vera Lucia RAPOSO Santa Slokenberga Tom Goffin Sofia Palmieri Hannah van Kolfschooten Prof Sandra Wachter Barbara Prainsack
-
Our analysis of the EU AI Act, as well as recent Australian developments in AI regulation.
The European Union has enacted its Artificial Intelligence Act. We consider its applicability to Australian organisations, and subsequent potential impact on the development of artificial intelligence regulation in Australia. Find out more https://lnkd.in/g9j_DkT6 Authors: Thomas Crowe, Prasanth Kapilan
-
-
It's the rentrée in Geneva, and after #UNGA, and the adoption of the #GlobalDigitalCompact, United Nations Human Rights B-Tech would like to re-emphasize the important messages coming out of a workshop hosted together with Global Network Initiative and Humane Intelligence during #WSIS earlier this year. These insights on risk assessments, audits and #bizhumanrights are highly relevant for the implementation of the #GDC and beyond, in particular daily tech company practice. We will be following up with more related event documentation from #UNGA in the coming weeks. In the #WSIS event summary, we stress three key messages: 1. The UNGPs are an existing established framework which can enable rights-respecting risk assessments for AI products. 2. Legislators and companies alike must identify suitable methodologies to assess AI products and services with regard to human rights risks. 3. Expert stakeholders need to be involved in oversight and enforcement to ensure both are effective and rights-respecting. Jason Pielemeier Dr. Rumman Chowdhury Lene Wendland Radka Sibille Ramsha Jahangir
GNI, in collaboration with United Nations Human Rights' B-Tech Project and HumaneIntelligence, have published a high-level summary of the key takeaways from our workshop on algorithmic risk assessments and human rights, and implications for audits, hosted at the EU Delegation to the UN in Geneva on May 30, 2024. The event was held on the margins of the International Telecommunications Union’s World Summit on the Information Society Forum and AI for Good Summit and over 60 experts from civil society, corporate, and government backgrounds attended. Stephanie Linden Seale Dr. Rumman Chowdhury Lene Wendland Isabel Ebert, PhD Read the full summary: https://lnkd.in/g6dE2bRR
Event Summary: Algorithmic Risk Assessments, Audits, & Human Rights - Global Network Initiative
https://globalnetworkinitiative.org
-
🔵 Stay informed on the latest insights into Kosovo's media and information landscape! Join us as we unveil our newest findings on Information Integrity trends. 📈 #DISICON7 #NDIKosovo #USAIDKosovo #InformationIntegrity #AI National Democratic Institute (NDI)
-
-
In May 2024, the Council of Europe adopted the first-of-its-kind legally binding international AI framework, “Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law.” This is a common legal framework open for adoption at the global level and requires the signatories to adopt or maintain appropriate domestic legislative, administrative, or other measures to ensure that activities within the lifecycle of AI systems are fully consistent with human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. This Client Alert summarizes the robust multistakeholder negotiation process behind the Framework Convention along with its key principles for adoption by signatories. Read more by CMI's Clark Jennings, Kate Molony Growley (CIPP/G/US, CMMC RP), and Akanksha Sinha
Council of Europe's First Legally Binding International Treaty on AI To Be Signed in September
crowell.com
-
ENNHRI welcomes today’s adoption of the landmark Council of Europe Convention on Artificial Intelligence (#AI), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law by the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers. While we remain concerned by the Convention’s level of human rights protection (read our previous statement 👉 https://lnkd.in/eCUqUZpJ), we now urge Council of Europe member States to ratify the Convention and make ambitious declarations that fully endorse its provisions. We look forward to the wide ratification, implementation and enforcement of this Convention. See our call to Council of Europe member States on what to do below ⬇. The Convention offers a starting point for ensuring the protection of human rights in the digital age. ENNHRI and #NHRIs remain committed to working with the Council of Europe and its member States to advance #humanrights, #democracy and the #ruleoflaw in the context of AI. 🔗 Discover more about the Convention 👉 https://lnkd.in/eHfwABYD 🔗 Read more about our work on AI 👉 https://lnkd.in/dS_Yyf3h
-