Victor Lang’s Post

View profile for Victor Lang, graphic

PE & VC Due Diligence | QofE | Founder @ Verified Metrics.com

I’m seeing an increasing number of founders (and friends) exit their startups this year. Most of them have never exited a business before, and unfortunately, roughly half of them are likely to end up in dispute post-close. The most common reason is a term that almost everyone has never heard of. Working Capital Adjustments (WCA) are part of the broader Purchase Price Adjustments (PPA) in a standard M&A agreement. They intend to adjust the purchase price based on the actual working capital at closing compared to a previously agreed-upon target. This prevents the seller from emptying the bank accounts and running off with inventory before the deal closes. This mechanism is disputed so widely because Working Capital is often defined as “GAAP, consistently applied” — and this is not specific enough. A dispute arises when the buyer and seller interpret items differently, such as accounts receivable. These may seem small, but the cost can be in the millions. Many lawyers suggest that the solution is to draft a detailed dispute resolution process, which ultimately leads to higher fees for the lawyers. We believe the better solution is transparency. Referencing a pre-agreed set of financial statements and calculations that are up to date in real time during the closing process can align buyers and sellers. Combining this with a defined list of Accounting Policies and using GAAP only as a fallback mechanism safeguards against dispute and ultimately protects the sale proceeds.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics