Ullekh NP’s Post

View profile for Ullekh NP, graphic

Executive Editor at Open Magazine. Author of 'The Untold Vajpayee', 'War Room', 'Kannur'

Food for thought! One of the biggest incongruities in Indian journalism is the habit of describing a 'general' category person or groups as 'upper caste', in and out of context. Let's not talk about how the western media portrays our caste system. Now, there is no category called 'upper caste' in our quota system. We have SCs, STs, OBCs, etc and since 2019 (at the Centre) General EWS (economically weaker sections from the general category). In the case of SCs and STs and OBCs, most media organisations describe them more or less the way they are officially classified. They are also referred to as Dalits or backward castes, respectively. Editors should wake up to reality and refer to the so-called upper castes as the 'general' category, especially in election-related stories that talk about vote banks and in write-ups on quotas. Why do we have a knee-jerk impulse for substituting 'general' with 'upper-caste'? This journalistic preoccupation is reaching absurd proportions. It extends beyond Hinduism and to Christianity, Islam, Sikhism and so on. Some Christians call themselves 'upper-caste' Christians just because they belong to the general category! And media organisations also oblige by terming them 'upper-caste Syrian Christians'. Can't we stop this practice unless it is absolutely necessary to tell the reader about the caste / religious background of a person or a group? This dehumanises the underprivileged and endows unearned privilege on the others. It is politically correct to use terms like 'OBC voter' or 'SC candidate'. For all the others, terms like 'general candidate' or a 'general-category Christian leader' should be used (if it is a must for you to identify them by their so-called social status). Interestingly, EWSs among the upper castes are classified as EWS general. Which means ‘general’ is sort of a synonym for the formerly privileged classes while the ‘creamy layer’ (who do not get quota benefits among OBCs is called ‘OBC creamy layer’) concept applies exclusively to OBCs. They are technically in the general list but are still identified as ‘OBC creamy layer’. And let's not forget, the expression "upper caste" is just notional!

Sreejith Sreedharan

AI Evangelist I Author I Critic I Human Potential Explorer

5mo

We might get over religion, but not caste. It's certainly beyond media houses.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics